International Medical Conspiracy of the Child

International Medical Conspiracy of the Child Controlled by The Amedamnee  by Donna Young.

This Url is: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-952.htm  Originally Posted August 28, 2004

    "Daddy, if you want to know what the real test of human rights is all about, always ask yourself at any time, in any situation, in any part of the world - is it     good for children, is what is happening good for children. Daddy, that's what justice is all about."  A Minister of Justice daughter gave this message to her father, letter below. How will he protect babies and mothers, too, is the question before him.

This article provides the news releases and studies that have brought active management to be the standard of care on all women in child birth, today, with the risk of mentally and physically impaired children, some serious, some subtle but yet internally injured. I am a Mother and Grandmother, who has been there and done that in child birth. I have done 5-years of serious research of the organization and control over the birthing women, by women and men, alike.  It is power struggle, and most are after by deceptive protocol policies to harvest the babies placenta blood.   I say natural birth  if the woman can be encouraged to see the benefits to it, for her own well being and to have a blue ribbon baby, too, is far superior to active management, and ought to be the first choice of all women and the training of all medical persons.  

This is if we want more then living mothers and living babies, but to have also a healthy mother leave the hospital as she went into the hospital, not sick. We must remember that pregnancy is not a sickness, so the birthing mother needs simply warmth and trust of persons around her, and not strangers that have concealed interesting to get the baby's placenta blood, and increase medical costs for the institution they work with to take a simple birth into a $70,000 birth process, and have both the mother and the child leave the hospital's premises, compromised, or damaged goods.

 Most will leave living, but that is all the medical organizations are promising at this time, when they use active management, drugs, and cutting of the mother's body, and harvesting the baby's deprived placenta blood.  the policies of no harm done, best practice possible, went out with an Oath to the Gods, when doctors counted on a higher power then themselves to oversee their care and treatment to any of their patients, regardless of sex, age, mental or physical disadvantages.

A child's birth should be as natural as possible, not upsetting the mother's regular routine or position of birth, natural to her choice.   Active management is all about control of the mother and the child by many strangers, or doctors who have no patience in the timing of the arrival of a child, particularly, to a woman this person  has no relationship with and could careless of the results of the child's birth, if the child is harmed or not, or the woman.  

Active Management has always evolved around drug experiences.  This has been true for my own birth experiences, and that of my mother's birthing experience, and now that of my daughter, who may have been injected with oxytocin, to then direct early cord clamping imposed,  by WHO, on all her babies.  To not be informed the oxytocin directs immediate cord clamping is a violation of true informed choices.  

There is not stopping this control over the child's outcome of birth and control over the mother's birthing body, unless we concerned mothers and grandmothers organize, too. This may have to be an International effort.  The violations are of wrongful control over the pregnant mother's body and harmful long-term effects of internal damages to her children, who are early cord clamped.

Unless we, too organize, and use the Courts of Law as we find out if any court exists to uphold the International Human Rights Declaration, or our Nation's duty implied in criminal codes to enforce protection to the newborn child and the birthing mother, to criminal assault, battery, and attempted murder, where the woman did not know she was being placed in danger or intent of the medical person to use a drug that then directed the weakening of her baby, or babies, and the motive, concealed was the intent to harvest the babies deprived blood, now trapped in the placenta. How convenient of the policies and protocol to have the blood they denied the child by a clamping weapon.

The assaults and experiments on women and the children will continue until women are better educated.  This means better education of the violations to our bodies, in child birth needs better education to lawyers too.  It means, if they are not protecting all persons, without bias, and to take this as a serious violations, even if the babies and mothers live, we the common folk must have means to use the courts, by unlicensed members of the justice system.  This is no injustice goes unopposed by those who do not regard and protect women and children and treat them all as frivolous persons to be exploited by the professionals in control of law, politics, education, science, research, religions, and ethics.  The women that entered these professions have not assisted, so far, on this issue, at this time.  And, I ask, why not?  What do these women fear?  Or, do they consider women who yet have children inferior to their career and professions, that the woman are getting the treatment they deserve if they have children.  Is that a correct attitude? Is that upholding the spirit of the Human Rights Declarations of equal enforcement of the law and equal security of person to all, no discrimination of any kind or in any form?

 and the means to gain access easier to the layman of the court system today,and International, too, to make complaints of conspiracy of this nature of active management being controlled to be imposed as the taught choice to all medical students today.  The consequences are serious if the medical person clamps the pulsating cord when they cannot revive the child with skill of whole blood, to be given back to a gasping non-breathing child.

I am seeing the increased impairments of babies who were caused to be victims of drugs and early umbilical cord clamping.  The internal injuries are often latent in discoveries, of the minor-injured children -- who look apparently okay, but are to be found later learning and behavior problematic.  The more severely birth damaged children are seen quickly to be impaired. These are the children who were caused a stroke.  My theory is that by being injected with drugs, the ingredients of that drug crossed the placenta.  The gas or metal formed or linked to the blood molecule, like mercury is attracted to the iron of the blood.  The bigger molecule caused a blockage, during the birth of the child, or soon after.  We know that injections of mercury are in the vaccinations soon after birth, like the Hep B shots, and possible the ingredients in Vitamin K, as well.

Vitamin K  is injected into most babies immediately cord clamped.  It is believed used to restore the blood clotting factors of the blood because the harvested babies have now low blood platelets, and other blood deficiencies.  The science and drug companies are getting the benefits of the whole blood deprived the child, a constitutional violation of equal security of the child violations, and world wide.  The are many other nutrients of the blood that were sold to science.  

Many babies have heart and lung problems too, caused by low blood volume and pressure to these organs.  My theory is the foremen ovale "flap" does not seal because of low blood volume and pressure, and this is true that the ductus arteriosus does not cover over, for the same reason, low nutrients and low blood volume and pressure.  

Such babies may take over a year for the hole in the hearts to seal.  In that time, they may be subjected to open heart surgery, of which they may suffer brain oxygen debt and be caused to be retarded, or they may die.  See deaths of babies in Winnipeg Manitoba, 12, and many others that have not been properly investigated as the parents are not organized to make such complaints.  Many of these low blood volume and low pressured babies remain anemic for 6 weeks to over 6 months.  Some may die in that period of time.  If the babies survive this birth assault, the children may be delayed in means to learn as well as or with the ease of other children not subjected to being harvested at birth.

Such compromised children are increasing world wide -- Autism now taking shape in China, as to the last internet report.  All this is being caused by organized active management policies and protocols that are imposed as first choice of all licensed medical persons, today. Most of the medical randomized clinical studies, now used as a medical law of enforcement of the opinion of the controlled studies, were done by women, who, I say are the Amedamnee -- the damned.

These medical women, were involved in randomized studies that withheld information to their own sex.  Could the woman being experimented come to court and say they actually choose to weaken their babies by early clamping if told it is best for the babies to be stronger if they receive all their blood and self-determine how much blood they need, and not the experimenter doctor, making that decision on another's child.

False information or no information was put in the references materials used in grades K-12, and information was false or missing in biology textbooks and misleading information is now being taught at the Advanced Education Institutions.  Few persons are sharing the dangers of active management. And the medical women, silent on this issue, or fearful of their careers, have, apparently, sold their souls to link up with the experts, the Obstetricians and Gynecologists, IFGO, for example.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists did not, indeed, cancel Policy #216 November 1995 , if immediate cord clamping is now world wide.  ACOG directed immediate cord clamping on all babies  for a bogus reason of getting a pH blood sample. Many midwives went along with this, knowing they were getting paid to collect blood samples they syringed from the placenta, many did this in secret of a conflict of interest what they were doing with the placenta and the placenta blood trapped there by a clamp.

You do not cut off an infants circulation system to get any blood sample.  The policy believed cancelled has again surfaced in Active Management of fear of bleeding  to cause early clamping on all women, feared to be anemic, world wide.  This one policy fits all needs to be questioned in International Human Rights Courts, if one exists?  Is such a Court accessible in Canada, or the United States?  If not why not?

FACTS:  One in sixteen in Canada, is being revived after active management.  These children who were endangered by early clamping need to be investigated if they are the babies adding to Canada's higher health care to children under one year of age.  Today, the cost is $6,000 per children under one year of age, compared to about $17,000 per care of every senior citizen.  Old Age we cannot prevent.  Internal injuries to our offspring is preventable by better education and paying the mothers to birth themselves, unassisted, even in hospital private rooms, with the mothers in charge, at all times.  

Until I see an organized Break Away of all medical groups and nursing groups, from Active Management, I advocate women birthing today, to have a Signed Birth Contract, ( see Table of  Contents)   . This calls for a hands off care, for a Do-It-Your-Self Child's Birth. And to make sure ambulance medics do not take control, they must sign the birth contract before they enter the home so they do not touch the mother or the child.  These  medical persons, apparently, as to one  instance of a damaged child, do not have the 9-1-1 medics competently, or ethically trained. Some of the men are involved in the taking over the control of the mother's body, and have been found doing experiments on women. One woman had the medic impose himself by putting his two very large hands up inside her body.  One hand went into her anus and one into her vaginal's birth canal.  This chief of the medics, demonstrating his control over the woman to others, may have caused greater damage to the child.  He may have pressed done on the baby's umbilical cord or hurt the baby's spinal column.

I have not found the training of medics to do this, but male doctors think this a good idea. That is an attitude of another man supporting the actions and control over a female. It is power.  It is dominance.  I say, his treatment, other then to transport the mother to the hospital was his only duty. He could not see what his big hands were doing in a very experimental and not approved by the patient he do this.

Again, his intent was not annouced of his care and treatment to a child having problems of a shoulder dystocia, just the baby's head born. This is one indication the medics are taking advantage of doing anything to the mother's birthing body, on the State of OHIO's allowance, or the municipality taking responsibility of the training of their 9-1-1 medics, and hires and pays their contract, are attempting to have the 9-1-1 medics excused of accountablity. So don't call 9-1-1 medics, if this is anything goes of care to a pregnant woman if you value your self-respect and the outcome of the child's birth.  Don't call them until you confirm their training manual and their intent of clamping off the umbilical cord too.  What does their manual state, what ediction, past and present editions.  How is their training changed to go with active management to rob the baby of their palcenta blood?  Are their women involved leading the pack in harmful training to women in child birth.  Have these women had children themselves. It is a fair question if they are putting out false information on the birth of babies in how some women will be abused in child birth. What doese the general public think of this medic's care?  I think he should not be allowed to attend any more emegency births and the persons he influeced retrained to natural birth, and keep your hands of the mother and the child, and give the clamping tool to the mother warning her that no clamping is necessary at all, but cosmetic, and she choses, if every to remove the cord and placenta, or to fall of in a day or two's time.  

I would recommend that the 9-1-1 are not allowed to touch the birthing mother other than to transport, her if she request to the nearest hospital, if she thinks she needs assistance.  The medics are not competent as to this medics treatment to this lady, to have taken over from a midwive.  He later clamped the baby's cord, rather than revive the baby on the umbilical cord, and the baby is not expected to live past two years of age.

So don't allow them to touch a birthing mother's baby as they are not accountable or responsible persons of a reasonable prudent person. They are taking dangerous liberties with he mother's body, and not be held accountable. The medical counsellors are also trained in false care of the cord, directing any dirty object used in disrespect of germs getting in the tied and cut cord.  

One ambulance medic used a dirty rubber bad to tie the umbilical cord .  The cord had not torn so it did not need tying off.  And, who knows what they used for a knife, when they did not have to tie or cut the cord to revive the baby. The duty was only put the baby in a warm towel, or leave the baby ont he mother's stomach for warmth and keep both warm.   By doing natural care, not amputations of the child's cord, they would step back from being involved of any legal accountability of a child now suffering with HIE.

The child was born alive, but was denied the legal right to catch up on the oxygen and blood flow. This circulation was likely compressed by the cord for a shoulder dystocia complicated birth.  Such babies may taken 20 minutes more time to get all the blood from the palcenta into the baby's now expanding lungs, to do the lung exchange.  The lungs take a great volume of blood and that is why the palcenta blood is used for, to be transferred into the baby's lungs.  That is why the palcenta has yet 60 percent of the total blood volume. The placenta act as the baby's lungs, in the womb.  The blood in the placenta is NOT EXTRA blood, it was created for this child's personal needs.  It is wrong for medical persons to meddle and give the baby's blood to another cause. The lawyers are not defending the baby's legal rights, as a legal citizen of equal protection of the criminal codes being enforced for no boidly harm or the threat of it being cause the newborn citizen. The police are not competently trained on the rights of the babies after birth to not be harvested by convenience of the doctors when to clamp the cord.  It is set by logic, and reason of prudent persons, you leave the cord alone, until the placenta is expelled. The cord after a time will be white/silver, limp and not pulsating, and only then with the informed consent, of the risks to remove the cord and placenta for cosmetic reasons, may the amputation of the cord be allowed.  The law firms, at this time, allege women and chilren are frivolus persons, if they are being exploited, but are not caused their death or serious internal injuries, so violations of endnagering are being ignored by those training most lawyers blocking access to the legal system on this issue. We are not being told which court protects babies and the birthing mother?  Or, how to access the courts if the law firms are not representing and taking seriously the mothers complaint their baby placenta disappeared and the amount of blood in it, and they did not give informed consent to clamp the baby's placenta.  The doctor imposed and that is battery, as far as my understanding of the criminal cord. The intent was to destroy the palcenta and all evidence of the amount of blood and to use the nurses as accessories to this crime and they failed to report the amount of blood yet in the palcenta and where the blood went, and the placenta too. All this was being done in a conspiracy of secrets of the local community hospital, involvement too.  The hospitals were acting on what was done on their premises remained a secret by all employess, not on persons as to identity, but as to policies being practiced in the care and treatment of the child's palcenta, with blocking the parents stopping the harvesting of their baby's organ, that the parents can remove if they want, and when they want, and not allow the taking of one drop of blood from the placenta, or cord.  That is not done in natural births.  Or needs to be done.  The law firms, so far, on this issue, are perceived to be protecting of professional persons of praticing harmful medical policies, that needed to be stopped, by use of the courts, if necessary.

 Had the medics involved in this mother and child's care, merely transported the mother to more professional care, they would not be criticized, just by keeping the mother warm and the baby, too, if born in their presence.  

COUNSELLORS OF 9-1-1 IMPROPERLY AND DANGEROUSLY TRAINED ON THE CARE OF THE CHILD'S UMBILICAL CORD CARE AND MANAGEMENT:

The counsellors of 9-1-1 are directing tying the cord off with dirty shoe laces.  This is being heard on their recordings of directions of emergency births. The counsellors are making the tying off the cord an medical need, and that is false information, that the source of information has to be indentified.

Even the pioneers, if they were to remove the cord (many did not never or tied it), knew if cosmetic removal was demand of any father, wanting neat and tidy over a healthy baby, or the mother, too, for the cosmetic removal, done patiently, hours after the child's birth, they boiled the string and knife or scissors, and used a tad of iodine. Then then buried the placenta with lime on it.  The pioneers had common sense. They knew not to endanger the child with a virus infection or the mother, too. To be clean in the child's birth was to spare the life of the child and the mother, too.  That was known in the 1865, of the writings of two medical books, " The Contagiousness of Puerperal Fever,  1843, Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, and the doctor that put words into practice, long before he published his article, "The Etiology, Concept and Prophylaxis of Childbirth Fever , 1860, Dr. Ignaz Phillip Semmelweis.  The latter was ridiculed into an early death, and in the year he died, 1865, Joseph Lister got rich in the selling of antiseptic to stop the death of 50 percent of all operations.  The death rate of 12 of every 100 women fell by doctors changing their dirty clothing after looking after the dead, and the midwives, too, for washing their hands and having cleaning clothing too, from going from killing a chicken to delivery a baby.  Both male and females, were killing mothers and babies, so it was wrong for the males to organize and make the baby business, their priority. Of the $600 billion in medical costs in the U.S.A. are correct, of that cost, $20 billion is taken for child birth.  I say it can be reduced 93 to 59 pecent if we pay the mothers $3,000 dollars for a hosptial Do-It-Yourself-Birth, only calling docotrs as needed, when needed, at the request, only of the mother, if conscious.

Here is our talents lost of our children:  one in 150 autisic, when one in 30,000 had true autism back in the 1970's (WB, Autism, 1979).  One in ten teenagers suffering from mental problems in Toroton, CP, May 4, 2004.  This is the fate of private enterprise contracting with our medical services and these licensed persons are either very uneducated which is a breach of trust they are not competently trained; or these medical groups are highly unethical persons, endangering others by seeking to practice policies and protocols visually unsafe to those they are imposed on.

Safer births are possible for women trained in unassisted births; allowing for the birthing mother ito be in total control, and undrugged as to her choice. This is unassisted birth is advocated for in a rented hospital room. Others have suggested and I, too, suggest taking along a door stop to be used to assure privacy with the mother's own birth witnesses, always present.  

The mother and her birth witnesses that can be family or friends, then follow the Mother's birth contract, they have all signed and posted a copy to the outside of the birth-room door).   Only mother can change her mind  what is not done to her person, to birth a child, and no one can invasiveally handle the child's lifeline. That is not an option.  That is a duty to the newborn citizen in order not to weaken the child.  NOT even the mother can direct the weakening of her baby, in order to steal her baby's placenta blood to give to even another sibling, as I see this issue.

The rights and duty as to protecting the baby's own organs, is a duty. The placenta is the baby's. The palcenta blood is the baby's, and none others.  The new born child protective care and duty to the child, must be brought before the Courts. This is because too many children are being violated as to being exploited by their age and mental and physical disadvantaged, adults are picking on babies, not protecting them.

RIGHTS OF THE MOTHER TO REFUSE CUTTING OF HER OWN BODY TO BIRTH A BABY.  

NO women can be forced into a c-section, not even by her spouse, to birth her baby or babies, if multiple births. The mother's body is her own domain, and religion and Courts are not allowed here. A court, not even a Judge can order the mother's body cut to birth any of her babies.  If they die, or the mother dies, that is fate, and the mother has informed choices of all risks known that are factual, not lies.   

However, the mother takes the responsibilities. She does anyway.  So, accepting informed choices, it is, affer all, her body. Any drugs that are being suggested, is her right to refuse.  So the mother must rule what is not injected or IV'd into her body. The visual and testable facts are that all drugs and gases cross the placenta.  

The fathers can order the mother to do anything with her child's birth.  Mostly, the fathers are ignorant, too, on position of birth, drugs, and early clamping. If they are being dominant and ignorant, still the mother pays for that control, that may become outside her own choices.  

The mothers body being cut, an episiotomy or a c-section are serious invasions being done to her person.  There is nothing ever safe when anyone puts a knife to another's body.  In fact, such invasive child birth need not be done, in 93 to 95 percent of all births.

What is behind active management in 93 to 95 percent of caes.  It is greed, money for services.  It was a money making a medical ritual that increased a doctors fees. Think of the doctor a business persons, does he want a flat fee of $500.00 for witness a mother's birth?  Is he satisfied with that.  Why not increase the fee for services?  And, the hospitals have  fees for contract services too.  

Often the father of the child, do not take the time to investigate with the mother-to-be, long before the birth of the child.  So there is panic at the last moment of the intents of doctors to use force on the woman to comply to their training of active mangement, drugs, cutting and the use of tools, forceps and vaccums.  All are generally unnecessary if the mother is relaxed and not being manipulated by time management.  Often the doctors have resorted to  use fear and controlling and in a militant manner. One female doctor pushing past the patient's own mother-nurse, and said, "fear of bleeding" I must clamp the pulsating cord and did that, no informed consent of the mother.  Did the mother contract to harvest her baby's blood on going along with a pretense, "fear of bleeding" then had her baby's palcenta harvested for storing at a private cord blood bank, where the baby's blood may be one day sold to the highest bidder?  

If the mother is not paying for the storage fees of her baby's deprived blood, there may be anger if the doctors want that particular baby's blood, so all are after a windfall of selling the baby's deprived blood, including, possibly, parents that have an unnatural love for their child, exploiint them for a possible $30,000 an ounces for the baby's deprived blood.  So I ask, who is protecting the baby?  And if the mother is not unethical, to get in on the selling of her baby's deprived blood, who is protecting the mother of the risk of feto-maternal blood mixing?

This is the situation of the choices of the management of the mother and child during the selective care of the Third Stage of Labor.  It is the Third Stage of Labor where the violations are happening in most instances and the law suits are stemming.  This is the time of the medical power play on the child's care.  It is a power play of control, and now women, the birthing mother and the professional career ladies, many involved in the harvesting. So who then protects the babies?  Again, all drugs and gases cross the placenta, and the babies are immediately weakened by drugs and early clamping. Autism and its various degrees are the child's fate, in most instances.

For the concerns share to others, you may find this article, below, of futher interest, naming the players involved in directing active management.

_____________________________________

CHILDSCREEN  

Attention: Kathy Blanco  

August 28 2004

Copy To: The Honourable Irwin Cotler, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada   Fax: 1-613-990-7255  

Subject: Which Court deals with Protecting the Neonate as a targeted group of persons violated by unnecessary harvesting of their placenta property, blood? Can you find out what Court deals with this in your Nation and which court would deal with the Nations of violating the duty of giving the best to babies, that it can offer? Duty to the Child: To Quote The Honourable Irwin Cotler statement, a concern stated by his then 15-year old daughter, who may be a future mother, some day:

    "Daddy, if you want to know what the real test of human rights is all about, always ask yourself at any time, in any situation, in any part of the world - is it     good for children, is what is happening good for children. Daddy, that's what justice is all about."

Let us bind the Hon. Irwin Cotler, Minister of Justice for Canada, to that obligation in spirit and truth and in deed.  Let us "all" Protect Babies, and the Mothers, Too. www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Today, mothers are seeking a satisfying birth experience. But after achieving that experience, many, then are NOT protecting their babies as to the care and treatment after the birth, in the care and management of the baby's umbilical cord, yet, firm, red and pulsating, doing a performance of a benefit to the child. The cord, the pulsating in it being the child's heart, is allowing the transfer of yet oxygenated blood into the baby's now expanding lungs. The negligence of protecting the cord, the lifeline, the quality of lifeline, is mostly because the women, in birth today, are uneducated of the purpose of the placenta.

The current mothers are weakened mothers, and faint to see the placenta that nourished her child during development and its purpose is not over at birth of the child, but may continue for 20-minutes, after the child is born, so the cord must not be tied off, clamped, or hand-squeezed, or cut off. The choice of timing of the clamping of the cord, must be told the mother, no harm to leave it alone. Failing to advise, the mother cannot, do a duty and protect her baby, nor the father of the child. The parents, today, as in the past generations, to about the 1920's, are ignorant. But not so the medical persons, who had a legal obligation not to endanger the child, or ought to have that perceived duty.

_____________

Dear Kathy,  

How are you? What you and others can do: Tell others, world wide of the threat to the newborn citizen, the neonate. Can you please share what group you may be now working with to share equal concerns of the need of medical alert of those conspiring to use bogus reasons to do early umbilical cord clamping and robbing the baby of their placenta blood?  This is the current organized medical groups intention, identified below, to weaken babies world wide. As a concerned mother and Grandmother, I am speaking up and encouraged, all others so concerned to do the same.  No one should be  weakening any baby, by race, color, sex, or mental or physical disadvantages, or by marital status of the mother, or by her religion or belief.  What is happening is, I believe, a criminal offense against the person.  Two persons are being weakened, the mother for risk of feto-maternal blood mixing by a caused engorged placenta, and the child is visually weakened by up to 60 percent total blood volume deprived, see quotation of facts below.  This medical alert issue must be taken to the proper courts. But which one, and who can approach the Courts today, for unprotected babies, a vulnerable group of our society.  If the police will not investigate the revived babies, the now sick babies, internally damaged, and the babies that died, who will.  Those babies that died were may be the lucky ones who were not revived to live impaired and compromised the rest of their life.  Ask the parents of those raising impaired children, if this was their lot in life, they must accept.  Or was it their lot in life imposed on them by others?

Harvesting of the babies is no longer a threat to the wealthy nations, or just a threat to the common and uneducated (not warned) people of Canada and the United States, but an international medical conspiracy to harvest the child, and have the mother weakened by feto-maternal blood mixing. Two groups are then targeted in a blatant conspiracy of on-going medical expenses, exploiting the child for his her blood. It makes no difference if the baby's blood is wasted or used practically -- the baby's blood should remain inside the baby's person, for the baby to be the best person and healthiest it can be, by the design of nature. God is not malicious in design of nature. Man is deceptive of motives and can be malicious of intent to hurt those he seeks a revenge on, for perceived wrong doings of past historical events. We can have the Hitler's rise, again, and promote survival of the fittest and in corporation power, too. Our babies are being harvested, with intent of deception of no harm done, and payment to the persons obtaining the blood and organ. This is controlled now by private corporations taking over the health services. These corporation powers are controlling the private cord blood banks, tissue banks, and cloning of cells for profit.  

(See the John Moore case-law on the internet).  

ARE WE OUR NEIGHBORS KEEPER?:  

We, who are born in developed nations, being stronger, do have some means to provide supplements to weakened babies, who were early clamped for harvesting, at birth. Some parents arranged that, even to have a premature baby born, to be harvested as they can have more stem cells. Now, the blatant false reasons for doing harvesting is to have the controlled medical persons trained to harvest blood from babies from all races, on the fake excuse, fear of bleeding of the mother. It makes the well being to the mother an excuse to violate her child, to harvest the engorged blood in the placenta, as after care and treatment of the placenta blood, not being then wasted. It is sold by the collectors of the blood to private interest groups. The right of privacy of the family's genetic codes, go with every drop of blood or tissues collected, too.  

The developing nations are much more vulnerable even less chance to be educated then we are with access to the Internet. They have less control of the fate of their child, and have not the same access to medical recovering programs, nutrition, or can deal with long term effects of mentally retarded children caused by low blood volume and pressure to key organs, the brain, and central nervous system. They will not know how to deal with autistic children, any more then we do in Canada and the USA, no having clusters of damaged children of one in 150, and teenagers (Toronto CP) are  violent and distressed, one in ten, and having problems with the law, and are on drugs, and their education and future, uncertain.  

Those in small villages, of developing nations, who one time did not tie off or cut the cord, now are at risk of super bug infections, and low blood volume and low pressure babies, caused to be anemic. These villages now are unprotected. They are now equal to our own uneducated women, even of our own two Nations. These were and are the current mothers, yet to birth, their babies to be early cord clamped. The fate the mothers do not know or cannot stop is the known intentions of the medical persons to clamp off a functioning organ, the umbilical cord. The medical persons intent to harvest the child's deprived blood from 2 ounces to 6 ounces, sometimes more. This is breach of trust and touching of the child's blood circulation system. It is a visual endangering to any child done to, whether the child is born by a c-section or a vaginal birth, and whether the child is full term or premature.

Taking a drop of blood from a newborn child is not a benefit to the child, and must be considered battery, when intent was no informed consent to leave the child's lifeline alone, for a natural birth process. This natural process transfers the placenta blood of some 60 percent total blood volume into the now expanding lungs of the child, to do the gas exchanged, formally done by the placenta. A fact of science known and visual since the beginning of time. And documented in human writings, since 1801 by Dr. Erasmus Darwin. He knew and stated the child will not die...the child will be caused to be weaker if the cord is tied before all umbilical cord pulsation ceased. Man knows better, but the medical persons write policies and protocol to escape the duty to the child and to avoid criminal prosecution to laws they made outside of the Nation's duty to protect the child, equally, to the care of any adult, not discriminated by age or mental or physical disadvantages.  

The policies, as identified before, I believe are part of the plot to allow without stopping by the police or the government, in violation to protect the child, will have the child harvested for their nutrients of blood for research. Any baby weakened by blood denied them is an International Violation of known Medical Laws and Duty of ethics. We may be reverting to a very low standard of human care, and disrespect to the vulnerable, women in birth, and their babies.  

The law for full protection must not exclude criminal prosecution to those medical groups in a conspiracy that they are not telling the public of the weakened of the child, by exploiting the child, at birth, to supply the nations with his/her blood. This is a breach of trust that the babies must be forced to tolerate survival in weakened bodies, that they were deprived their own nutrients of blood for science research. The parents not knowing to seek aid with a currently or past trained medical persons, was to weaken their baby by deceptive intent of fear of bleeding, being the now cause to create anemic conditions in babies, and inject them, with disease, controlled by executives of corporations having all the power, who gets what Lot in vaccinations, hot, or carrying experimental stuff no one knows is in the injections, other then the drug corporation.

These medical groups are not approachable or accessible, nor have in many cases contact address, to confirm their research was with informed choices and alternative choices made known to women. For example, Judith S. Mercer recent report was on 30-second clamping a choice over immediate clamping. Her study did not allow the women to make a choice of NO clamping and the results included, and no clamping with no drugs taken, ever, compared to no clamping of drugged babies of oxytocin, for changes in the baby's blood, being then a factor, caused by drugs.  

Various medical groups are apparently organized by a few executives. I believe they do conspire to weaken any baby, for color or race meaning type of blood desired. Had this baby been born naturally, he she would not be weakened, if that medical person was absent from the mother's care.

The proof of unassisted births producing healthy babies, those who did not have their umbilical cords clamped or cut was evident in the research of Dr. Mavis Gunther,* 1957, London, that unassisted births, the babies thrive. Any child born in a taxi-cab, whose cord was not tied off, is a healthier baby, then if the baby had been born in a hospital, where early clamping off the circulation system is now common practice, called Active Management.

Gunther M. M.A., M.D. Camb. Obstetric Hospital, University College Hospital, London, The transfer of blood between the baby and the placenta in the minutes after birth. Lancet 1957; I:1277-1280.

Link to Gunther's report, last page only. read between-the-lines.

http://www.123-baby-birth.com/doc/Nov123%20baby%20birth-341.htm

Have you referenced the two petitions for others to be alerted to, and to make some of their own, too.  

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/954816565  USA Petition

Canada's Petition Appeal, Protect Babies, and Mothers, Too.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814  

Parents of damaged children, even if they have received compensation for their child's medical caused injury, and early cord clamping must be considered a violation to the child, no true informed consent of no clamping of the cord ever, unless the cord tore, allowing nature to discharge the placenta to informed mothers of Primal Birth Traditions, now called Lotus Birth, need to find out which court and who is in charge to take this concern and the fact a handful of executives directing the harvesting of babies, world wide. These are those connected with and joined with a dangerous group of persons, in the management of the child, involving active management. These are the present trained, and past trained members in the Obstetricians, Gynecologists, Pediatricians groups, now taking in the membership of joint policy, the Nurse-Midwives. Some of the members controlling policies may be wise to investigate their youth training, as to being part of the Hitler's group, in survival of the fittest, and destroying persons or exploiting persons considered inferior, or helpless to protect themselves.

The executives of the said professional groups, are now found on the Internet to be organizing a controlled mass collection of the newborn infant's blood and this is taken into private enterprise blood system, not controlled, or being charged with a conspiracy on the child.

These executives, if you investigate their writings were paid bias writings, that left out details of long-term effects of drugs and early clamping, until the child was an adult. Often the studies were being told the child had no long-term learning disabilities, by being caused anemic conditions and their brain drugged by morphine (Demerol) and caused blood vessel restrictions by the use of oxytocic drugs, Pitocin, for example.

The executives were controlling the education of the medical persons, world wide, and in a conspiracy of the end result, the early clamping obtained the stolen placenta blood denied the child, and wrongfully deprived the child, for no good medical reason, which is visual, of the amount of blood the intent of the institution was to gain the blood, and by excusing bogus policies. The bogus policies had to be created to avoid criminal prosecution, but they are of a false alibi, when examined in a court of law. The were bogus too, as false pretense of reasons for early clamping would be found in a lie, that the mother was not informed of the dangers of any drugs, leading to early clamping and creating an anemic condition in her child. 'Thus, the child, in anemic conditions was injected with adult-sized injections of diseases, of live viruses, in some cases, with preservatives of heavy metals, mercury, or Thimersol. The chemists knew mercury, in any form, natural or man-made, gas, liquid, or solid damages the child by the child having a low immunity system. That the mercury can create a larger molecule and cause strokes and heart attacks to those injected with mercury, the seniors and the infants being the most vulnerable.

The conspiracy is found to be true of the executives, that are often concealed as to who all they are, and if they can be found at any established legal address. These medical executives, including the World Health Organization, are now found to be directing "every" woman be injected with low-costs oxytocic drugs, (Pitocin, Syntocinon, Oxytocin, Toesen) for the "fear of being anemic." The low cost drug is then mandatory followed with immediate cord clamping. Then by Federal, State, an Provincial allowance of ethics committees following directives of a handful of persons, no informed consent is allowed either of the parents that the placenta with the engorged blood in it, the baby's blood is stolen ; no required reports of how much blood was deprived the baby, generally from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, which means even 2 ounces denied any one particular child is sufficient to put a child into shock (20%). Reference, the Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, handled by Sommers and Roth. The intent is to sell the placenta membrane, and the cord. They too are used without informed consent in tissue banks. The placenta can be ground up for other nutrients.

The stem cell cord blood banks can pay the doctors and nurses for their collection of the blood, at a wholesale deprivation of the infant's blood, at a mere $150 to $250. However, the retailed blood can be sold for its components separated at likely $30,000 an ounce for stem cells ; and perhaps, even a higher value for interferon that is used to fight all virus.

The baby's condition of anemia is hoped to be better within 6 weeks to 6 months. What child must be forced to tolerate an anemic condition by having their blood stolen by professional persons failing to advise the parents, no clamping, hand-squeezing off the cord, no tying, and no cutting needs ever to be done, unless the cord tore. The latter suggests rough handling requiring an investigation of negligent care of the baby, at birth.

The harvesting of the baby is negligent teaching and ethics of the doctors and nurses, now void of ethics, morals, and the law in dealing with others trusting them in no harm.

The press release of the Joint-Policy-Statement by the handful of executives, making their directives law in medicine and teaching involved making active management of drugs and early clamping, the priority of all medical persons, was mentioned in those that are selling us out, by the American College of Nurse Midwives. The Press Release was by USAID, November 7, 2003.

Part of the conspiracy to have all infants give up their blood by Active Management directives, by handful of persons include these biased and very controlled and secret results of the outcome of the births to babies, include the following, all part of the conspiracy to control the woman's body, where she births, and with whom, and the aid of the woman is the one to determine the quality of the child's life, or life itself by the timing of the clamping or hand-squeezing off the cord.

In Canada, the Cochrane Library References are used, making this report the First Choice of Active Management:

1. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labor . Pendiville WJ, Elbourne D, and McDonald S. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000:(3): CD000007. This report does not really have expectant management which was traditionally watchful waiting of the third stage of labor, the expelling of the placenta naturally, that can take 5 to 20 minutes, or sometimes longer. In that period of time, the baby could be left on the untied umbilical cord, wrapped in a nice warm towel, resting on the mother's stomach, even nursing. The expectant management of the five reports used in these reviews all had the use of oxytocic drugs, followed with 30-second clamping. That is a far cry of natural birth traditions and rights of all women and informed choice. The change of expectant to mean any resemblance to natural was they were saying a drugged woman with only "one" drug was compared to women who were drugged with a combination of abortion-drugs, the oxytocic drugs, that varied in brand names.

2.  Judith S. Mercer's report of participation of 30-second clamping vs immediate and instant clamping  was being used in Canada, as the new improved care of the third stage of labor, using 30-second clamping as the new delayed clamping and not what expectant management use to be, hands off the cord until the placenta was expelled and all pulsation of the cord ceased. While Judith, personally, knew natural care of the cord was best, she participated in counting 10, 20, 30-seconds, clamp the cord. She knew better, yet has not retracted her study as leading to the harvesting of babies. Her study can be found at www.cordclamping.com{HYPERLINK "http://www.cordclamping.com"}

I believe those editing www.cordclamping.com, for all their excellent articles must indicate what they actually mean by delayed clamping? Because 30-second clamping means the child is vulnerable to shock, and he/she may die. This is because only 20 % of blood deprivation resulting likely for merely 30-second allowance of blood transfer, not making allowances for compromised births, can result in proven and observed shock.

This is likely to weaker babies, like premature, or those with birth dystocia, like shoulder dystocia, resulting in a compressed cord. They will need perhaps 20 minutes on the pulsating cord to catch up of blood going into their lungs, now expanding. It is reported that even 2 ounces of blood that is deprived the child, can put the child into shock, needing revival. Any revived child is impaired and compromised to the degree of deprivation of oxygenated blood and the blood nutrients.

Any delay in the compromised and impaired child may result in serious internal damages, to the brain, central nervous system, and all organs, the heart, the lungs, kidneys, liver, digestive hormones becoming dehydrated, and so forth. The serious impaired children are in Canada awarding of over $22 million dollars to two Asian boys,whose cords were interrupted from the continuance of transfer of blood flow into the infant's would-be-expanding lungs. Lung problems are not so much as immaturity, but deprivation of oxygenated blood flowing into them, stopped by the intent of the medical aid, or their false and incompetent training.

3. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Volume 49, Issue 1, January-February 2004, Pages 2-3, with other links, had this invited commentary, Active management of the third stage of labor: why is it controversial? by Donna Vivio CNM, MPH, MS and Deanne Williams CNM, MS, available online 4 January 2004, they, personally, supported the "Joint statement: management of the third stage of labor to prevent post-partum haemorrhage, Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Volume 49, Issue 1, January-February 2004, Pages 76-77.

The midwives and doctors are putting a "belief of fear of bleeding" for their own decision and cause to clamp the pulsating cord. They are not being visually and  reasonable prudent persons.  They are visually and knowingly depriving the child of 20 to 50 % total blood volume.  These nurses may be the agents of death to a child, or can be the agents of seriously impairing the child, and shortening their life span and/or quality of life.

The intent is to conceal the amount of blood deprived the child, because no nurse, doctor, or medic intends to record on the child's own medical chart the amount of blood deprived any one child, or multiple births, of the amount of blood they stole to send for personal collection fee, the blood that belonged inside the baby's own person. They intended not to tell the mothers, no clamping of the cord is necessary, and to avoid the oxytocic drugs that is directing early umbilical cord clamping by the World Health Organization.

The committee that directed early clamping for the reason of the use of oxytocic drugs was not identified, so we have organization of executives making world wide policies expected to be carried out as protocol on all women, world-wide, in every community hospital. The intent is to have the blood sent to free-enterprise corporation blood banks, now in charge of the Nation's genetic codes, and we do not know if the corporation leaders are friend or foes? What is their philosophy, and who says we have to trust them with our baby's blood containing our genetic information, and this is private property, as well as the baby's blood is private property. No parent can enter an agreement between a medical person to weaken their baby, as is the case of early umbilical cord clamping, even if the child lives, or is revived to live.

4. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Volume 46, Issue 6, November-December 2001, Pages 381-392: Management of the third stage of labor: an evidence-based approach,  Mary C. Brucker CNM, DNSc, FACNM, available online 7 December 2001. Abstract. "Active management includes routine use of cord traction and uterotonins (oxytocin), whereas expectant management can be characterized as one of watchful waiting. . . . However, on the basis of current evidence, if a decrease in postpartum bleeding or avoidance of manual removal is desired, an active approach to third stage is the one that SHOULD BE ADOPTED until and unless contradictory findings are published."

My comments are informed choice over appropriate care, not knowing what that is specifically mean means knowing how to avoid uterotonins by a Birth Contract, and have warm water natural unassisted births, or hand's off births, even when a medical aid is close by. The mothers right to no touching of her person or her baby is her right, and that can be included in the Birth Contract. I believe woman should be paid to be educated on natural birth vs. drugged births, as all drugs cross the placenta, and risk the child, as to WHO's directives, immediate cord clamping, creating an anemic condition (low blood volume and pressure) in the new born baby, whose blood was then stolen and given to another's cause, and financial profit to those in possession of the child's placenta, cord and placenta blood.

5. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Volume 46, Issue 6, November-December 2001, Pages 402-414,  Current best evidence: a review of the literature on umbilical cord clamping. Judith S. Mercer,  CNM, DNSc, FACNM, Available online 7 December 2001. Abstract, "Cord clamping studies from 1980 to 2001 were reviewed. Five hundred thirty-one term infants in the nine identified randomized and nonrandomized studies experienced late clamping, ranging from 3 minutes to cessation of pulsations, without symptoms of polycythemia or significant hyperbilirubinemia."

My comments. In this study, Judith was reporting some midwives were yet ethically trained and not doing interruption of the umbilical cord. However, times have changed and midwives cannot be trusted to do no hand's on birth and are surprising mothers with fear of bleeding as an excuse to stop the circulation between the placenta and the infant's expanding lungs. It is organized and intentional the mothers are not told the harm of early clamping to themselves and their child. That midwives are being trained to be unethical and not have true informed choice, and are misusing their Code of Standards of Ethics and Care, as I have presently known this to be true. What mother for a fear of anything will agree to endanger her child on a whim of fear and panic of a medical person. ONLY a mother told her life is danger, then she does not protect her child, for her own perceived safety.

Only a mother preparing to give her life for another, is able to say, "No" to endangering her child, for a mere fear of anything. Our medical society know that, if women abort freely their babies, they will be conned easily to saying "Okay, clamp the cord, if you think I may bleed."  This is this the expectant reply of an uneducated mother, easily deceived she is in danger, when there is no evidence of fact, she is bleeding, and you can deal with bleeding until after the placenta is expelled, in any case.  Is that not logical?  But it indicates the poor education of mothers giving birth today, that they are so easily manipulated by persons, they trust not to do deleterious tricks of the medical arts.  The women have learned well, from their masters, the Obstetrician and Gynecologists that set the early cord clamping policies for many fictitious and bogus control reports, with motive of deception of getting something more valued the the baby (a by-product of birth), the placenta and placenta blood, and cord.  

The educated and informed mothers are far and few in-between ; The birthing mothers, today, mostly by lack of education, are sacrificing nothing today, so they believe even if they are in on the selling of their babies blood, they believe the State will pay for the care of their weakened offspring. The expectation of the mother now with a damaged, impaired and compromised child, most autism, is getting even by placing the financial burden on the tax payer. That is just, the taxpayers are not organized to protest the harvesting of the babies, so it is fair they pay in higher taxes for negligence of care to the offspring.

Those mothers knowingly harvesting their babies, who are more so weakened by injuries, as they do not have the blood nutrients to heal from broken collar bones, and skull and rib injuries during an active managed births, did, in some cases, sign waivers to allow their baby's harvested for placenta blood.  But, most were deceived, too. They were not told no clamping of the cord is no harm done to the child, and that clamping off then cord is merely cosmetic, leading to the next step, the actually cutting and severance of the child from the his/her organ, the placenta, and deprived blood.

Others, who did not allow the harvesting of their babies blood, just had their babies routinely clamped by the unethical training of the doctors of today, and the older doctors, who did know better, changing their ways of a $30,000 hopeful harvesting of a few ounces of requested targeted blood, valued more then the life of the child.  This is genocide being done by mothers and fathers around the world, allowing babies harvested, of their signed choice.  In some cases, the plea bargain of dying babies, assumed shook by the parents, were to let one off the hook, not to be charged with an accessory to a crime of assaulting a child.  (See the accusations of the Yurko Project.  The mother was charged too, but did not go to court.  The father was alleged the killer of his baby, of shaking the baby, after the mother had the baby vaccinated over 6 times with some "hot" vaccinations, by the order of the State to vaccinate an impaired child, premature at birth, early clamped, and yet in recovery.  The child died 2 1/2 months of age, two weeks after the fatal injections of "stuff" with mercury in it, the adult-sized injections given to a recovering premature child.  The father yet serves life, plus ten, for alleging he killed the child, by shaking the baby.  Not so, says many medical persons reviewing the similarities of vaccinated damaged babies and birth injured babies by active management policies being followed.

MOST PARENTS INNOCENT OF THE BABIES HARVESTED AT BIRTH:

Most harvested babies were harvested by deception controlled by the medical persons in charge and the medical institution receiving then stolen blood property of the babies. They don't regard it as stolen baby's blood. No, they regard it as discarded blood the baby could not receive because of early clamping.  However, the means the hospital and the lab and doctor gets the blood justified their ends - the baby was the by-product of their delivery fee.  The intent then is higher medical costs to revive the damaged baby. Some being revived at the cost of $250,000 for their on-going care, and never to be a fully dependent adult, with all the joys of life or to meet its challenges, as normal.

NO informed consent to weaken the baby means the parents are not accessories to the crime. The doctor intended the deception to take the babies blood, but revived the weakened baby, so believed no crime was done to the child. Again, the revived baby medical charts are absent of the doctors or medical persons intervention of the circulation system and the medical system plotted to destroy the evidence, too. They did not record and intentionally did not record the amount of blood stolen from the infant that was trapped in the placenta. That was organized world wide by those training the medical persons, and particularly, of the nurses, today.  

This Judith S. Mercers study of the practices of the midwives did, at that time, did indicate healthy babies from true expectant management, or Primal Birth Traditions, following natural full delayed clamping. The study included the once practiced expectant management, that likely had no drugged births. It was the no drugged births that revealed no side-effects of jaundice or thick blood. This can only happened to educated women, knowing the side effects of drugs taken during labor.  Other delayed clamped babies did have jaundice indicating either the mother was sick or the baby had problems dealing with the drugs chosen for labor discomfort. All drugs, gases, and IV and injections cross the placenta, but the mothers birth are often told, "the stuff will not harm the child."  That is a lie, only intended to tell the mother the drug will not now cause a physical imperfection on the child.  The truth is the drugs offered can impair the child's mental abilities for life.  The drugs can dissolve the membranes of the delicate fetus brain.  Once the membranes have holes in them, they may allow access to the child's brain by the vaccinations given the child about 12 hours after birth, many with live viruses of Hep B, with mercury elements in it, too, a heavy metal that may likely create larger molecules of the blood, attaching to iron.  This may cause strokes and blockages by the larger molecules, the seniors and the infants the most vulnerable to mercury, Thimersol, side-effects of flue shots, and other injections, both are required to have by the powerful controlling nurses and doctors tied in with corporation power of drug companies. And the drug companies ruling the policies made by governments, that can have shares given to make laws not in the best interest of the common people, now being exploited world wide.  A medical for profit weakening of the common folk for greed of profits, as I see it.

Today, by false information in the biology textbooks and in the prenatal classes, all controlled at various government levels, the birthing women are NOT adequately educated, to know about the rights to refuse active management policies. They do not know how they can prevent known caused threat to themselves by refusal of the not necessary IV hook-up, as to alleged prevention of dehydration. Once the uneducated and about to be exploited birthing woman is hooked up to the IV, a morphine drug can now be easily switched from Ringer's Lactate solution. The mother if requesting a no narcotic birth, is now vulnerable to "appropriate care" signed forms going into full force.  The salty, Ringer's Lactate, is now switched without her informed consent to a mixture of morphine and oxytocin, combined.  The women given birth is considered mentally incompetent, being in labor discomfort, so all her choices are made for her by the signed "appropriate care" and she does not know what that will be.  The morphine is to keep her brain numbed not to be aware her baby is going into distress by the morphine and the oxytocin.  The oxytocin is causing 90 second birth labor pains, tremendously, painful. Even with the morphine, the mother screams in constant pain, of fast, hard, close between as the placenta is being torn from her womb and the baby is distressed.  It is now the leading cause of the increase of 26 percent increase in c-sections, active managed distressed babies.  There in the c-section, the distressed baby, fighting for his/her life, will be harvested of the multitude of hormones now in the baby's blood stream, trying to spare the baby's life.  But the baby is a by-product.  The hormones and stem cells, and interferon, is what the science persons want, controlling the politicians, the laws, and exempting them from conspiracy against to targeted groups.  During the c-section, we watch in horror as the team of doctors doing immediate cord clamping, then the cutting of the cord, and the baby past for revival.  The parents are stunned. But pleased to have a living baby.  That is all the State is promising to the parents, if they have a doctor delivery their baby, or a midwife, or an ambulance medic.  They proud parents then go home happy with a revived baby. The parents are none the wiser of the problems their baby will face in being caused autistic, and have ADDS, and many other internal problems from this active management, including lung problems, and brain lesions.

THE MAGICAL CHILD IN US ALL:

That we are as normal as we are is written in this book, written in the early 1970's, as this is no secret sharing.  The Magical Child.  Read the Chapter, Time Bomb, as to the internal brain lesions and damages caused any child drugged during the birth process and then early umbilical cord clamped.  The person is an educator, Joseph Chilton Pearce.   It is shared in his research, much being done by B Windle, that it is estimated that over 40 percent of the declined intelligence of the human race, is due to the active management policies.  The danger was to developed nations that could look after their sick. But today, the intent is broaden the harvesting of babies, not to every other child, but to all children, to exploit them all, and in all nations, including developing nations by going into the small villages and taking away by false teachers, the Primal Birth Traditions, that did no clamping, tying off the cord, and not cutting it off, leaving it to fall of naturally in a day or two's time.  This was the method of care even to my own grandmother, who birthed unassisted on a farm in Alberta, Canada. Both my parents were unassisted births, and yet live, ages 91 and 90, to celebrate 67 years of marriage, September 5, 2004.  Their own offspring did not fair as well, as during the War years, babies are harvested more so for blood need of wars. So any one born from 1939 to 1945, were likely harvested babies, and we lived.  But our struggles were harder then those babies that had ethical doctors and did no clamping on the cord, until all pulsation ceased.  How did they determine whose baby was harvested by faster early clamping.  Only the doctor decided at the time of the birth, by sex of the child, by color by race, and even if the child was fit to live, being two small, may have brought on immediate cord clamping, the child put down by the secrets of the medical arts and crafts, the nurses saying nothing, too.  

Now, today, there is the international conspiracy to harvest the babies, world wide.  The laws, of the Nations, the Declarations of Human Rights, they are all superfluous, big money spent to put them on print, but the spirit of the law was not intended to be enforced as I see it, not by the State police. Perhaps, as to the reason of the Declaration of the Human Rights Declaration of 1948, it was intended for the Rule of Law, and Due Process of Law, to protect one and all equally. This was so no person would react by taking the law into their own hands for injustices going on unopposed.

As harvesting is concealed in many multi-levels of organized medical protocols and policies, there seems no stopping any bodily crime or offenses against the persons, the mother (feto-maternal blood mixing) and the neonate, the newborn citizen.  This is because the conspiracy involves profits to those making the laws, this can be shares in corporations receiving the baby's blood.  It can be in the wholesale collecting of blood samples, the value of the child's well being sold for a mere $150 or $250 an ounce to the collector of the organ and the blood properties trapped in it.  Those that are following the policies, as though damned souls, or being a amedamneee (blind follower), are part of the concealing of their intent to do early clamping for many a bogus reasons:  Fear of bleeding is the newest to the invalid reasons, the past which have been:  short cord ; or a fear of too thick of blood, too fast flowing of blood, too much blood, all of the last three can be tested for and if found true other means then blood-letting can be found and depriving the child of nutrients of the blood.  For a short cord, what is wrong with patience of holding the child in a nice warm cloth,until the placenta is born?  Then there is the cord around the neck. The facts are a sponge between the cord and or a finger between the cord deals with this cord, if you clamp and cut it the baby goes into distress, see the Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, handled by Sommers and Roth.  

The drugging creates the need of a now distressed child and mother, to be rescued in a major operation, with more risks of its own.  This is a c-section birth of a watched distressed baby. In the c-section, the baby is early clamped, and the more distressed hormones released in the baby's blood, like interferon and stem cells, are harvested in a larger and more valuable selling profit, to those taking the blood from the doctors for a fee, or the institution that gain the placenta blood.  

These babies, who had no drugs and were the blue ribbon babies of their times, were the more-or-less ethical results of ethically trained midwives. But they too are retiring as were the older doctors who have, in most cases, made their profits, and are silent in how their younger doctors intend to make their living by exploiting the mother and the child.   Judith Mercer's report is about the last of the ethical midwives that used natural birth traditions.  The healthy babies were undrugged and likely born to undrugged mothers, who took no drugs before or after conception, legal or illegal.

It means that delayed clamping experiments on women who did have jaundiced babies, had information left out of their reports, that the mothers accepted a drug that crossed the placenta and caused their babies to be jaundiced, the drugs were likely oxytocin or morphines.  Such distress and drugs will be the factor, or a sick mother will be a factor of a jaundiced baby, or a baby injured during birth, broken ribs, collar bone, or skull.  Generally, such injuries are caused by forcing the mother to birth in a flat on the back birth position, or in a semi-sitting birth position.  Both are imposed to give ease of control of the child's birth and the decision of the medical person to clamp the cord.  Such birth positions were known harmful since 1913 to close the birth canal up by 30 percent.  This brought on doctors higher medical costs for services of doing mini-operations, called episiotomy, with all their resulting infections to the blood, to the mother and the child.  There is not too much good things I can say about the medical persons, of the past, or of today, as I am an experienced mother, so I have been there and had that done to me.  But the mothers of today, are not better educated, then I was, nor my mother, nor of my daughter.  But they are more at risk of having a nice looking living baby, that is weakened by blood deprivation, so they stand a chance to be raising children with limited means to survive and learn, and will have a shorten life span, getting sicker in their 20's, 30's and 40's.  The babies will be under more distress of their organs and cells damaged at birth, put into distress to survive of low blood volume and pressure and added viruses to fight, so they will age faster and sooner with brain disorders and muscle disorders.  The babies with MS diagnosed at 13 months are indication of that.  Children living in institutions at age 13 for mental problems are costly, and will be the next group of persons experimented on with drugs.  

PAY THE MOTHERS TO BIRTH NATURALLY -- LETS SUPPORT A BABY BIRTH VOUCHER CREDIT OF $3,000.  It sure beats $60,000 per year for the life of an caused autistic child.

All of this internal harm  is preventable and cost to society to pay for damaged babies that cannot meet their fullest potential. So if our society is harvesting babies, the society will pay in some way back to the damaged children.  But by the proper truthful education to the public, babies could be blue ribbon babies.  But the press medias also control the health and science manuals and text books, and for a hoax or whatever reason they have deceptive teaching on the management of the child's umbilical cord, are not likely to warn the public.  Truth in natural birth education is hidden from the public.

And what birthing mother is doing research on the Internet.  What grandmother to be is protecting her grandchild from being violated by the system and the powers that be?  Where do they start?  Which Court?  Who cares?  It ought to be the first birthing mother's right, privacy in birth: a hand's of birth.  The mother, even in a rented hospital private room,  will call if necessary, if or when the mother ask for or  wants help, otherwise, her and her birth witnesses will follow her natural birth plan. This natural birth costs nothing.  So I advocate paying the mother $3,000 in a birth credit voucher, and she pays for her own choice of drugs...and everything is alimode...everything she request by a professional person becomes deducted from the birth credit voucher.

This makes the mother really take responsibility for informed choice which drug will do what to her body and her baby, and she signs full accountability to raise a damaged drugged child, the rest of his/her life, at the mother's own expense.  Anything of active management the birth mother pays for and she cannot expect the father to raise an impaired child for her choices of being actively managed, a father has legal rights too, to have a child not damaged by drugs as long as he is educated, and not a bully directing the mother to birth into the hands of doctors intending to exploit both the mother and the child, just assure they will be revived, somewhat impaired, and compromised by their state of the art medical crafts used, to day.  What the mother takes home from natural birth being her choice, is what is left is her labor of love take home pay, so to speak.  This is a Do-It-Yourself-Birth Contract. The mother takes all responsibilities when to change her birth contract. That is true informed choice.  Now what woman wants true control over her body.  So I wonder if women have been dumping on the system, too, not taking responsibility to find out about the actual birth of their child, including knowledge about the placenta the placenta blood and what makes the throbbing of the cord -- the heart beat does that. You knew that, of course.

 The controlled false randomized trials were deceptive reasoning as they intended to misguide by missing information, to give an alibi of fear used by many medical persons, fear of jaundice or fear of thick blood to cause them to not allow full completion of the child's birth, all pulsation in the cord ceased. This fear of something, for causing early clamping is now organized internationally to now be fear of bleeding of anemic women, being a common world-wide problem, even to developed nations.

It is a conspiracy as we in developed nations can easily test for anemic mothers long before she births her baby. So the conspiracy to use oxytocic drugs followed by early clamping, must be told a Judge, it is a conspiracy of the medical persons, in connection with likely shares in cord blood banks, controlled by giant corporations companies, that must be held accountable for every unit of blood they have received, wrongfully stolen from the owner/infant. Not even the parents can consent to weaken their baby, so the units of blood can be identified to consent to robbing of the baby's blood, that the parents then may have had secret intent to sell, at a future date, or donate the blood if they no longer paid to store the blood. Many stop paying the storage fee, so the duty to have protected their child with future means to stem cells, stolen at his/her birth, was never intended until the child was of legal age, to deal with being a weakened child. Many of the weakened babies had caused them to have life more problematic, their dreams of what they may have been or accomplished with less stress, were caused by being anemic at birth, not by nature, but by their parents deceived by a conspiracy on the child, by those involved in medical blood harvesting scams, or writing biased reports, concealing the dangers to the child.

One can read any medical report and now look to what is missing. In most reports the information that is frequently missing is the long-term results of the child, drugged and early clamped. There is no natural birth comparison, either, only various forms of active management. This review by Judith did indicate the midwives and nurses were then more or less, yet, moral, ethical, and competently trained in the fetus to neonate circulation system. The blood in the placenta is a benefit to the child's expanding lungs. Today, the current training of nurses is absent of visual facts of the proper care of the infant at birth leave the cord alone. The nurses and doctors are alleging they are not competently trained, to know or that they ought to know by self-research leave the cord alone, this if they are working in maternity wards or aiding in home births, to quote:  

6. The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice . In both the Third and Seventh Edition, personally read by myself, and to quote the 7th Edition, page 1161, Chapter 38, Nursing Care of the Newborn: Circulatory Changes, Anatomic Changes (see p. 1118) Blood Volume, 5 . Placental transfusion at birth--increase in blood volume of 60% IF CORD IS CLAMPED AND CUT AFTER PULSATION CEASES.  

This indicates the nurses were to have been competently, ethically, and morally educated to know the risks of early clamping and depriving the child of even 20 percent total blood volume deprived the owner/infant of his/her property, blood, and taken for experiments or wasted. It makes no difference how the blood is used.  It is a violation of Constitutional rights was to the owner/infant, being robbed of even "one" drop of blood, taken genetic tests of his/her blood.  This robbing of the baby's blood, in most instances, was imposed without true rights of the legal guardians to prevent privacy invasion on the child's rights. Such as not having to give up a blood sample for any genetic testing.  It was ruled battery if imposed on the child in Dublin Ireland.  Battery is an anywhere criminal complaint.  

It is believed the large sample of blood taken is not for the child's testing of PKU.  This is because the test is done before the child has been given milk. The PKU test I am told is to test the child's means to digest protein.  The PKU tests are being medically charged for are not valid or even the results told the parents. In some cases the parents were never told the results, and never saw all reports of the child's Apgar scores.

THE CHILD'S CARE AND TREATMENT AFTER BIRTH, INCLUDING THE CLAMPING OF THE CORD TIMING ARE NEVER RECORDED ON THE CHILD'S OWN MEDICAL CHARTS, SUGGESTING A COVER-UP FOR LATENT PROBLEMS OF LOW BLOOD VOLUME AND PRESSURE:

The amount of blood taken from the child's personal organ, the placenta and the cord, were never intended to be recorded on  the child's own medical charts.  This is as to the amount of blood and where the baby's blood went. Did the child's blood go to research, stem cell transplants, cloning of her/his cells for interferon taken (fight all viruses), white cells, platelets, and minerals and vitamins, hormones and enzymes?  The child has a right to have had all this information written on their own medical charts, for civil rights assured of complications of the child's care, and if the mother and father contacted with the doctor to allow the child endangered by early cord clamping.  The child would have civil rights for the parents own peril of being deceived and not getting second opinions of the child weakened by wrongful reasons the doctors and the institution gave for a cause to do 30-second and early clamping, and evidence after the fact to prove the child benefitted or the mother by the child caused to be low blood volume.  If the parents were deceived by the doctor having a conflict of interest in profits by collection of the organ or the blood in it, it is breach of trust.

All these were wrongfully deprived the owner/infant, and no parent can agree to enter an agreement with any medical person to weaken the baby, denying the child of equal protection and security of person. Revival of the child is not assuring the child equal enforcement of the law, no battery on his person, a threat to their enjoyment of life, as to now missing blood volume, ingredients, and nourishments that would have protect the owner/infant, if not wrongfully deprived.

7. USAID, The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), November 7, 2003, Press Release. USAID agreed with the first ever joint statement and an action plan to accelerate efforts to prevent excessive bleeding known as postpartum hemorrhage. They named: International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. This is after ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists cancelled immediate cord clamping Policy #216 November 1995, as of January 2002. So did they say 30-second clamping replaced immediate to still harvest the babies, and went international? Also named in what I say is a controlled conspiracy of harvesting all babies, without means to protect them, are the International Confederation of Midwives. Who are the executives that directed endangering of our babies? How are they made personally accountable for directing needless interruption of the baby's circulation system, and often in environments unsafe, with no immediate means to revive the child with blood expanders or whole blood, such in ambulances, homebirths, and in small villages of developing nations.

Also involved, were the Bureau for Global Health; the American College of Nurse-Midwives ; John Hopkins affiliate JHPIEGO, IntralHealth International, Inc. ; and Management Sciences for Health. What they were waiting for was every midwife, of her own choosing or doctor, or ambulance ratified the executives joint policy by deed the action of not thinking standing on their feet.  The memberships are not allowed Resolutions or votes on policies at their conventions. Or I have never seen a Resolution of best practice possible, least risk of harm to the birthing mother and her baby.  That is not active management.  Best practice possible is letting the mother do things naturally, even in a rented hospital room, if we are concerned about her safety if she does need help and requests it.

The policies of only allowing or educated on active management, the use of drugs followed by early and immediate cord clamping, are just created by elected executives or appointed members to the World Health Organizations, some of whom are not doctors or qualified nurses, but representing told views to be approved.  

Again, a handful of persons were organized now "internationally" to create a form of control over the pregnant woman's body, to control her labor with drugs and the birth of her child with oxytocic drugs, followed by creating an anemic caused condition of the child. USAID naming many others, were organized internationally to alleged prevent bleeding deaths of pregnant women by drug injection of low-cost drugs, and were making it a directive on "all" women.

I know this personally as to my own daughter's child, being immediate cord clamped because two licensed midwives, in the Markham Ontario area, Canada, did immediate cord clamping on my granddaughter for the fear of my daughter bleeding. There was no evidence my daughter was anemic, and they caused my grandchild to be weakened. This fear of bleeding was also used in May 2003, in Florida by a female doctor. In this case, the immediate clamping was witnessed, personally, by the birthing mothers, own mother, a nurse.

The female doctor in a militant manner, pushed past the mother, and clamped the yet pulsating cord, on the "fear of bleeding" alibi. This is an alibi to escape criminal prosecution and the review studies are also alibi. However, the battery is being done personally by the medical persons, as they have no true informed consent to stop the transfusion of the child's blood. So battery is to the child. In this case, battery was also done to the mother for the engorged placenta posed a threat to the mother to now take Rhogam for the prevention of serious blood disorders, if the mother intends to become pregnant, again. This was offered as to different blood (feto-maternal blood) were the risk to this particular mother, or the rH factors, were involved. It is not recommended early clamping be done in such cases, but there was the belief the risk could be taken, then make the mother responsible to take a believed cure, with the drug given have risks of its own, mercury or Thimersol in it, or other unknown ingredients or human body tissue that may lead to AIDS, or Heb C, or any of the Heb. disorders.  

8. International Confederation of Midwives, Code: "a. Midwives respect a woman's informed rights of choice and promote the woman's acceptance responsibility for the outcomes of her choices." This is fraudulent as the midwives are using surprise attacks of the "fear of bleeding" because the cause of early cord clamping. They are making the woman fear her life is in danger and the cure is to clamp the pulsating cord.

The risk factors to both the woman and the child were intentionally not told the two situations above by unethical training and purpose of the midwives. In both situations above, the care of the child, now weakened took away the attention of the care takers of the placenta, if they were draining out the placenta, in the womb, or were syringing out the placenta, and stealing the baby's blood without documentation on the child's own medical chart how much the blood the unethical medical persons were doing in the taking of the baby's blood. The design of nature is to allow the baby to take their own blood supply, as to their own needs. A baby that is 9-pounds creates one ounce more of blood to that weight.

The baby, if well in the womb, will have created 10 ounces of blood, or 300 ml. To deprive the child of 20 percent of blood drained through the cord into collection bags, 60 ml, means to weaken the child, to even go into shock (heart attacks, damaged lungs, each breath harder to take then the next breath). The organization of private stem cell blood banks, taken 60 ml to 180 ml per child. The payment is to unethical midwives. They get a wholesale payment of collecting the blood samples, and they are paid if the collection is not contaminated, to the quality of the blood and the quantity of blood taken. Check it out what your medical plans are now paying or the private businesses now receiving wholesaled blood. To the receiver of the blood, it can be worth billions of dollars, after cloning of interferon. The references to damages to the child can be found and the other conspiracy of false information in a variety of biology textbooks, also in on the false information so the public is not factually informed of the purpose of the placenta-lung-blood-bag. The placenta is only called a "flat cake", meaning placenta, after its blood that does the gas exchanged, is transferred into the child's expanding lungs.

Please see references at: ( www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm  ) See Legal case laws, London, Dublin, Canada. (See also, interferon sold from stolen blood and spleen tissues of the John Moore case-law. Appropriate care to controlled medical groups, means appropriate discarding is NOT burning but practical, pragmatic use making any person having any operation vulnerable to organs removed, for the purpose of cloning their disease and in search of interferon cells. It was Moore's interferon that would fight hairy celled leukemia that was wanted by a lab, working with the doctor to send his patient's their way. The doctor was charged civilly with breach of fiduciary trust, and settled out of court with John Moore. However, it is consumer beware of what the doctors, nurses are doing with your body and that of your baby born into their hands.

9. Negligence of politicians approving controlled form of discrimination to women, no true informed consent, was indicated in the Federal Canadian Health Critic's letter, Rob Merrifield, M.P. (Member of Parliament), Parliament Office, 502 Justice Building House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 (613) 992-1653 ; (613) 992-3459 fax ; merrir@parl.gc.ca,  to quote his letter, to my personal attention, dated December 18, 2003:

     "As Senior Health Critic for the Canadian Alliance, I have been actively engaged in the ongoing debate in Parliament over research using human embryos. (They cannot be used after 14 days, in Canada for stem cell research). . . . "I was not aware of any ethical concerns (other than costs of harvesting and storage) with respect to the use of this rich source of stem cells. Dr. Peter Hollands, Scientific Director of Cells for Life, an umbilical cord blood bank located in Markham, Ontario has stated that the collection of umbilical cord blood "does not interfere with the birthing process" and "has no effect whatsoever on the baby or the mother." The Cells for Life website (www.cellsforlife.com) describes cord blood collection as a "safe, quick and non-invasive procedure."

Why was he not aware of the dangers of harvesting the new born child? It is visual not opinion.

The placenta can be seen to be drained or syringed out up to 180 ml of blood, weakening the babies. Canada now reports one in sixteen babies being revived, and they have been harvested babies for stem cell blood research. The parents cannot enter an agreement to weaken their baby. NO one can make a legal contract to weaken another person, who needs advocacy, and so far the House of Commons are in breach of their duty of enforcement of criminal endangering to the child, and their Oath to protect all equally, being no form of discrimination to any group, by age, race, color, sex, mental or physical condition; or by religion or by marital status. Such duty of the liberties of life are universal, and were indicated in the signing of the Human Rights Declaration of December 1948. Since then, many Nations ratified no form of discrimination of any form to women, and to withhold information they are in danger by active management being imposed on them and early clamping is a violation of duty to informed choice. And early clamping is not the best care and treatment to the newborn citizen, robbing the baby of their own placenta blood and nutrients and for maintain volume and pressure to all organs, particularly to the brain and central nervous system that cannot tolerate oxygen debt.

This means that the babies in Canada and in many Nations are deliberately targeted to be harvested, revived, and the amount of blood stolen from their placenta by early clamping intends the babies to be made for the purpose of blood collection for adults, picking on the those that cannot defend themselves. The early clamping and immediate cord clamping is an organized conspiracy of the many multi-levels of government failing to protect the child, and uphold equal security of person to the newborn child, taking advantage of this targeted group, neonates. The elected officials, and this is international, are in criminal negligence for the enforcement of endangering is not being upheld as to the Nation's laws and duty to protect those vulnerable.  

10. The Tri Council Policy Statement, Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, (Medical Research Council of Canada ; Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada ; and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, August 1998. The executives of this group who were paid and controlled by the Federal Government of Canada, were allowing over $400 million in science research and including stem cell research. This executive, who had on their board, members of conflict of interest, those dealing with placenta blood taken from the living child, so deprived of property, blood and its nutrients, did allow and did encourage harvesting of the babies, directly or indirectly.

They did this by allowing the unconsented placenta, engorged with blood by early cord clamping, to be harvested of all of its contents. In most cases, the parents did not collaborate with the doctor to weaken their offspring, to then be a burden of higher medical costs and education costs to the general public. The breach of trust was just imposed by the choice of the individual doctor working in collaboration of the hospitals policies to allow the doctor to do as he pleased with the baby's placenta blood; often the hospital gets the proceeds, of the placenta blood if the work contract with the doctor is to be an agent and turn over the placenta and the contents to the hospital's lab; who may be private or on contract basis of profit sharing in stem cell research money paid for collected organs and blood and hormones they contain.

BODY FLUIDS WITH ESSENTIAL ENZYMES CAN BE STOLEN IN SYRINGE BULBS INJURING THE BABY'S VOICE BOX:

This makes most hospitals and their workers not trustable of harvesting not only babies, but any person using their services for operations where blood and fluids can be removed from the human body. It is gross but facts. Even the removal of the fluids from the baby's mouth and nose at birth can be harvested for the lysozyme , too. Babies are being harvested mostly for interferon, released if they are distressed, in actively managed births, and for their stem cells and other hormones and enzymes, too. It is a billion dollar business this harvesting of our babies, weakening, the future generations, too.  

It is known that lysozyme, an enzymelike substance found in human tears, and nasal secretions fight viruses, so they, like interferon, can be syringed out in a bulb. In the pioneers care, such mucus was wiped away by a clean hand or cloth, and not taken by science researchers. The bulb aggressively used to take out the mucus of the baby, often results in damaged voice box of the child, so they have speech problems. The aggressive bulb gagging often leads to a child gagging and having a heart attack, being now low blood volumed. So I wonder, what group are working to deal with doctors and other medical persons that have sold us out, and threaten us, with care if we disclose their intent of harm to both the mother and the child by active management, and all its down side not revealed to the public, as it ought to be. You can't protect these persons involved in blatant conspiracy, as they had all this as visual evidence, they ignored and did not tell the members of the public.  

All this goes on with a wrongful withholding of all the facts of the child's care at birth and the victim, in most cases, are the newborn children, living, now in damaged bodies. If they do not succeed in life, we further dump on them, saying it is all their own fault. If not the child's then the parents. Never do we organize and deal with the corporations taking stolen property of blood from the infant. An felony is not done with consent. The robbing of the baby's blood is not really done with true informed consent of the legal guardian of the child, the mother and the father.  

Again, the blood in any organ or any organ was allowed to be taken without informed consent, once removed from the previous owner.

Each one of you who has A VICTIMIZED CHILD, and you are aware that the child was clamped and removed from your body quickly at birth, and without a witness of the timing of the clamping of the cord, and the placenta disappearing, and not weighed and the amount of blood, are entitled to legal action of assault, battery, even attempted murder on your child, so weakened, they must be revived. The doctors and nurses reviving babies have not corrected a genetic problem, they caused the child to be weakened, that they revived the child as to duty does not mean they should not be charged with a criminal endangering of the child. The medical doctor and nurse did their own decision making. They had a duty to investigate the amount of blood deprived the child and to know if they were working as agents of the hospital as blood collectors, as a condition of employment. If so, the hospital administration must be held as an accessory for directing a weakening and endangering practice on any child born on their premises.  

If you have a weakened baby, of any internal problems, heart (holes in the heart) ; lung problems, learning or behavior problems (autism), they I would suggest you write a letter for criminal conspiracy of a handful of executives controlling the training of all doctors and medical persons, in your area, and world wide.  

I would suggest that your damaged children's stories be shared with the Government officials of the Justice Departments.  Only the victims of impaired children and those now revived and yet are expecting care of early clamping, heart problems and lung problems, be advocating of proper ethical training of the doctors and the public made aware they present medical trained midwives, nurse-midwives, and doctors doing baby deliveries are a security threat to the Nation's they serve. They should or ought to be investigated as to any concealed motive of revenge they may have to any society, for past ills of how they may have been treated, or a war lost, long ago. Surely, it is not only greed of money and profits that has targeted the birth mothers and their babies of internal damage to all organs, and mentally retarding of the offspring as to delayed mental, and in some cases physical impairments of a child caused to be mal-nourished at birth, by early clamping and low blood volume and low pressured. Some remain so, the rest of their life.  It cannot be ignorance of the medical persons, for this is all visual, not opinion.

Send a copy to your Head Justice Departments, asking, under Access to Information, which Court deals with conspiracies against the Child and the Birth Mother, two groups targeted for discriminatory exploitation. In Canada, write:  

For the Federal upholding of the Criminal Codes of Canada, no weakening or endangering of the newborn child, write:  

The Honourable Irwin Cotler  

Minister of Justice ad Attorney General of Canada  

284 Wellington Street  

Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8  

Fax: 1-613-990-7255  

Do Not Use their Web Site for sending email letters.  They don't count.  If you take the time to do a letter, please mail the letter or fax it.  It is best to send any letters of the Nation's security by Double Registered Letter and to the personal attention of the Minister you are trying to reach. And ask for a reply, at their earliest convenience.

The government civil servants are, apparently, in charge, and they have no accountability.  It is not the elected officials doing the government changes of policies, but governing officials with interests in private enterprise.  The public servants or the private agencies to take control did not even have to stage a coup de main. They simply took over our taxpayer's budgets and took over the telephones and all government correspondence.  Such coup d'e tat means a change of government does not really take place at elections, if the civil servants direct the ruling of the government and policies and who governs the police to act or not act, too.

I found that messages are likely ignored by any one 1,000 law agents, who do not necessarily bring the letters of the Public's Safety to the Minister of Justice attention, or the Ministers of Health's attention, or those that control and govern over the duties of equal enforcement of the law by the City Police or the Federal police, that being the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.  Why the babies don't count.  Babies, while identified as a citizen, at birth, on or off their umbilical cord, have no economical value to society, as yet.  They are also no threat to the leaders as they can't vote.  Babies  just don't count, and are really a by-product of their birth. Their wanted placenta blood is valued at a wholesale value of $180,000. That is realized at $30,000 retail cloning of interferon, taking from their placenta blood, and sold world wide, by their particular race or race mix.

The babies stolen placenta blood can be more valued then the child.  Unless of course, early clamping means extra dollars in the revival of the child, as a spin off. Some babies, managed under one standard of care 30-second clamping) do not remain breathing on their own.  The cost to revive such an impaired child can be up to and more then $70,000.  Then the parents are given a so-called Miracle Baby, but it is internally damaged child and very expensive to raise and educated. Unless the parents sue their Province, State, or Territory, they are stuck with the care of a disabled child.  Many look normal, but have serious learning and behavior problems.  

Facts:  In Canada, we have one in sixteen babies being revived after active management.   

I wonder what help the parents are getting raising a child impaired and compromised to the degree they had to be given someone else's blood and if the oxygen caused them to be blind; and the syringing out their voice box with bulbs, at birth, caused them to be mute?  Will the parents go back to birth injuries imposed, no informed consent. What about the baby's holes in the brain membrane that allowed viruses to get in after early vaccinated 12 hours after birth, yet anemic?  Again, the baby's don't count of equal protection when the various levels of Ministries of Health, local to the Federal levels, have allowed or directed living babies harvested for the purpose of science research.  This is believed Justice for the child, to be revived ? ? ? !!! Or killed?  That is what we fought in fathers and grandfathers fought in Two World Wars for?  For the current generation to exploit and harvest their babies for an adult's disease. Babies did not hurt us or cause our diseases. We did that to ourselves.

The Deputy Attorney General, British Columbia, Canada

Allan Seckel  

Faxed to: 1-250-387-6224  

Please send a copy of your letter, if you have a damaged child, that drugs during labor were a factor and followed with 30-second or immediate cord clamping. If the child was off the placenta before the placenta was born, your child was likely a harvested and disrespected child, and you were left to raise a damaged child, mostly on your own.  

Thanks for your feed back, at your earliest convenience.  

Donna Young  

Box 504  

Dawson Creek, BC  

V1G 4H4  

Canada  

tel: 1-250-782-9223  

Donations gratefully received at the above mailing address. Contact me if you want to right a wrong for a damaged child, no matter th