Rh-Negative Women and Child Birth Choices

    Child Birth:  Early umbilical cord clamping . . . "In Rh-negative women it SHOULD be AVOIDED DUE TO THE INCREASED RISK OF FETO-MATERNAL TRANSFUSION." (1)  Concerns, of Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother.

    For your convenience, this Url is:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-693.htm  August 10, 2004

    If you are wanting to know what the experts like the Obstetricians and Gynecologists have planned for any birthing mother, by protocols of policies, anywhere on plant earth, know that the international agencies created with these experts a Joint-Policy-Medical Statement. Supporting the decision is the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) reference, http://www.usaid.gov/press/releases/2003/pr031107_a.html

    Involved in supporting birth policies of a standardized care of active management and early umbilical cord clamping are the International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians and the International Confederation of Midwives.  Joining, too, in active management policies that includes immediate and early umbilical cord clamping following the use of oxytocic drugs are the American College of Nurse-Midwives, Johns Hopkins affiliate JHPIEGO, IntraHeatlh International, Inc., and Management Sciences for Health.  All are using anemic conditions to drug women with oxytocin followed with early umbilical cord clamping.  The early clamping knowingly deprives the child up to 180 ml of blood.  The USAID statement was issued sometime ago, November 7, 2003 and has gone unchallenged by the major news media.  

    What the public does not know is that active management does not cure any anemic conditions and early cord clamping knowingly causes anemic conditions to any child deprived from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume. A 9-pound baby only creates, from conception to birth, a total of 10 ounces of blood or 300 ml.  The cord blood banks, report the average collection from an early clamped baby is 60 to 180 ml, according to Cells for Life, Markham, Ontario, Canada.

    These birth policies are set in each nation by the experts, being the Obstetrician and Gynecologists. They are the leaders on maternity matters and the care of the child during and after birth. These policies will impose protocols on uneducated women, around the world. Regrettably, the midwifery conferences and most medical conferences do not encourage at their conventions, Resolutions , that their members can stand back from questionable protocols and policy statements which are intended to be an organized standard of care to control and to be imposed on women, in child birth. This is a targeted group, around the world.  Have you ever heard of any medical membership's resolution having a hearty and open debate challenging medical protocols and policies of the medical big-wigs?

(1) SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines, Healthy Beginnings:  Guidelines for Care During Pregnancy and childbirth, Journal SOGC, that is the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) Policy Statement

Policy #71, December 1998, page 63.

Reprints and copies are/were available at:

Journal SOGC

Maclean Hunter Healthcare/Sante

777 Bay Street

5th Floor

Toronto, Ontario

M5W1A7

Tel:  416-596-5000

The Good of the policy Recommendations of SOGC, Policy #71, December 1998 are:

"Labor:

- Admission to a birthing room with a therapeutic bath.

- No shaving, no enema.  (Comments of Donna Young, if they are imposed they may be regarded as assault even battery).

- Freedom to walk about at all times during labor and ability to use the therapeutic bath as needed.

- Choice of positions for the delivery. (Comments of Donna Young, if flat on the back of semi-sitting birth positions are imposed, it may be regarded as assault, even battery).

- Rooming-in is available 24 hours a day.

- Primary care and observation of the baby will be done in the room with the couple and other family members.

- All interventions will be performed only if they are medically indicated and will be well explained to the couple in advance.

- Special programmes as vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) and vaginal breech births are available.  It is also possible to leave the hospital immediately after the birth, but this must be discussed with the treating physician.

- Simple Birth Plan with Patient's signature:  Doctor's signature:  "

Page 42 Journal SOGC December 1998.

Pain Relief:  Medicinal or Non-Medicinal, (All see Doris Haire, www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-499.htm )

To quote SOGC, page 44:

    "Each centre caring for labouring women should offer both medicinal and non-medicinal methods of pain relief.  Available services should include . . . relaxation techniques, massage, positioning and comforting touch. -

Water Therapy:  

    "Aside from labor support, there is a good evidence for water therapy as a method of pain relief in labor.  Showers, Jacuzzis and tub baths are all effective in increasing the likelihood of unmedicated birth and may promote satisfaction with the birthing experience.  The literature indicates that tub baths and Jacuzzies facilitate the first stage of labor by promoting relaxation and decreasing the woman's pain perception, due to the buoyancy that the heated water provides while supporting tense muscles. 1, 7  Water therapy can an should be used in conjunction with other labour support techniques and has been found to be most beneficial when women are in the active phase of the first stage of labor.  More information on the administration and safety of hydrotherapy can be found in Appendix 5-1.  Caregivers should encourage upright postures and ambulation during the first stage of labor at this appears to promote progress, relieve maternal discomfort, and reduce the requirement for analgesia.2

- Narcotic Analgesia:  The use of narcotic analgesia . . . these drugs are associated with a higher risk of lowering the Apgar Score. 8, 9 Physicians should familiarize themselves with the pharmacokinetics of each agent they use an always bear in mind the effects on both the fetus and the mother.

- Regional Anaesthesia:  Regional anaesthesia techniques . . . Centres should use relatively low concentrations of local anaesthetics in attempts to minimize motor blockade while maintaining good pain control.  This philosophy should allow the woman more freedom of movement in the first stage and eliminate the routine use of supine positioning.  Women requesting epidurals should be partners in a thorough discussion of the procedure, its risks and benefits and the expected outcome.

- Fetal Monitoring:  Routine use of continuous electronic monitoring has been shown to lead to higher intervention rates and to date, no improvements in outcome for the neonate has been demonstrated.

Labour Support p. 45-46:

    Professional caregivers of labouring women . . . are able to provide effective positive labour support when labour and birthing suites accept and practise a philosophy of care that emphasizes:

    1. respect for family choices and individual needs;

    2. freedom for women to define who "they" consider as family an who they would like to participate in their care (may involve nurses/midwives and physicians working in partnership with family members, close friends, or doulas/patient-paid labour support);

    3. collaboration between health care professionals and the woman/family in the planning and implementation of care;

    4. flexibility in the provision of care (freedom to question traditional routine . . . increasing alternatives and options offered to labouring women).

Maternal Position: p 53

    Upright . . . Posture

    There is clear evidence that adopting an upright . . . posture for delivery is advantageous from fetal and maternal points of view.  Most trials show a modest decrease in the length of second stage for an upright versus recumbent positions, likely related to improved uterine contractility.  Mean umbilical arterial pH has been shown to be higher in babies born to women who have used the upright posture for delivery. 4  In addition, upright postures favor descent and have been shown to result in improved efficiency of pushing.  Mothers themselves also prefer this position as being more comfortable, and facilitating bonding.

    The traditional lithotomy position. . . Strapping women's legs in restrictive stirrups in the supine position is to be avoided.

SQUATTING POSITION , p 53 - p 54

    The squatting position has also been shown radiographically to increase the pelvic outlet measurements of 0.5 to 1.5 cm. 10  . .. recent adaptations of standard birthing beds with squatting bars, as well as other practical techniques for adapting hospital obstetrics to this position, have been described. 10.11

Delivery on All fours, p 54 . . . is another choice of delivery positions. This approach is popular. .. . some birth attendants believe that the position may be particularly useful in facilitating spontaneous rotation of persistent OP position.  "When a gravid woman is placed in a hands-and-knees posture, the heaviest part of the fetus or back in in a superior position to other fetal parts. If gravitational and buoyancy forces are sufficient, the fetal body will rotate." 12   . . . this may be a useful position to try.

Birthing Chairs or Stools . p 54 . . . "Use of a birthing chair is not the recommended way of adopting an upright position in labor.

    (Note from Donna Young...they are leaning backwards, and risk closing the birth canal up to 30 percent, the same as semi-sitting birth positions, or flat on the back birth positions.  If the chair is adjustable to lean forward, any leaning forward position, even a side-ways position, and comfortable to the mother is the mothers choice.  Have a signed birth contract the medical person is not in charge, the mother is.

WATER BIRTHS , P 54:

    Water births have become a choice for a number of women in some hospitals in Europe, England and North America.  Pools for this purpose range from simple portable pools filled and emptied with those pipes to built-in Jacuzzi-style baths. They are large enough for the woman to move around and the water is about three feet deep so she can submerge herself.  There is evidence that such baths promote relaxation and result in a decreased need for analgesia. 16  Water temperature is best maintained at about 37 C. (NOT too hot or not too cold).

    "If the birth is . . . to occur in the water, it is imperative that the baby's head is lifted out of the water as soon as it is born.  Deaths of babies (in home setting) have been reported when the baby was kept submerged for many minutes because of the mistaken impression that if the umbilical cord is pulsating, fetal oxygenation was still occuring.16

    (Note from Donna Young. . . sometimes the placenta is pulled away, if oxytocic drugs were accepted, causing harsher, longer closer together contractions and early pulling away from the womb.  It is fine to stay in the water and birth the placenta too, and not clamp or cut the cord, the Lotus Birth, the pioneer traditional method, primal birth rights are for all women.  The women have a legal right bury their child's placenta rather than to donate it science).

Conclusion , p 54

    "Women should be free to choose a birth position that is comfortable for them and enhances pushing efforts and delivery.  Upright. . .squatting have many points in their favor, AND SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED.  In contrast, the traditional lithotomy position has distinct disadvantages and should therefore be reserved for cases of operative delivery.  

SECOND STAGE LABOR , P 55

    "An arbitrary time limit for the second stage is NOT necessary.  Maternal status, fetus status and rate of descent should be the basis of individualizing delivery management.. . Interventions (malposition) would depend on the clinical situation and include position change. . .If progress is being made and in the absense of evidence of fetal compromise there is no necessity for intervention."

    (Note from Donna Young. . . the mother has legal right to a signed birth contract, that only she can change or her next friend if she becomes unconscious, what interventions she will or will not allow.  Interventions are always a risk to the mother or the child.  Some less invasive methods of checking on the baby is the use of using either a stethoscope or hand-held Doppler vs. the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM).  

    Other indicators for an intervention, suggested by SOGC, may be a reduction or absense of amniotic fluid before labor and the appearance of meconium are indications for monitoring during labour.  The mother has the right to be informed to know the risks of fetal scalp blood sampling and infections, and the risks of accepting any oxytocic drug that increase labor contractions and are an abortion drug, or the use of narcotics to slow labor down, like the use of a morphine drug, like Demerol.  SOGC warn about methods of doing fetal heart rate tracings for prognostic significance of variable decelerations described "atypical variables as predictive of a high incidence of fetal acidosis and low Apgar scores.  

    SOGC state ". . .prognostically, unfavorable decelerations with features indicative of fetal hypoxia include:  slow return of FHR fetal heart rate to to baseline, loss of variability during and between the deceleration, loss of initial and/or secondary acceleration, persistence of secondary accelerations (over-shoot), continuation of the FHR at lower level and biphasic deceleration? 22."

    SOGC mentions about the risk of acidosis and fetal hypoxia if stress or distress to the fetus happens and if the pathophysiological process is allowed to continue, the risk of morbidity or mortality will result. 25

    It is important, I say, to inform all pregnant women that they have the right to say "NO" regarding any cutting of her body, such as an episiotomy, and  SOGC, also state on page 56: "There is no evidence for the advantage of routine episiotomy."4

    I say, that all women have a right to be informed that in birth, not a sickness, that they have the legal right to say "NO" to a c-section, or use of tools, forceps, or vacuum extraction, used on their baby or babies.  It is the mother's legal right to refuse any intervention outside of natural birth because this is her body. If the medical system and/or the State, Province, Territory are allowing the destroying of babies during an abortion, the State, Province, Territory, cannot demand the mother sacrifice her body being cut in order for her body to deliver her child, if this is against her informed will.

    The facts of legal rights of self-determination means that ONLY the mother can make that choice of sacrifice for her own best interest, or that of the child's her choice.  For example, a Judge in the UK ruled a woman that doctors alleged was mentally unfit to decide when she was in labor to refuse a c-section, had the Judge order her body cut, to deliver the child.  The woman sued, and it was ruled not even a Judge can rule a woman's body cut to deliver a child, when it is against her informed choice to decline a c-section. See case-laws at www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm  That Appeal presented, I believe, would go for all the other interventions, too, at the risk of assault or battery (criminal offense to the person's body, bodily assault) if the woman has said, "no to interventions, " her choice and her right.

SHOULDER DYSTOCIA 29 page 56

Shoulder dystocia is defined by SOGC as "impaction of the anterior shoulder above the
symphysis or inability to deliver shoulders by usual methods. Following
delivery of the head, there is an impaction of the anterior shoulder under
the symphysis pubis in the AP diameter, in such a way that the remainder of
the body cannot be delivered. There may be a sucking back of the head
against the maternal buttocks, known as the "turtle sign". There may be no
restitution.

Maternal obesity and post-term pregnancy are the most important
risk factors.

Suprapubic pressure should be applied from the posterior aspect of the anterior
shoulder to dislodge that impacted anterior shoulder into the oblique
position.

The posterior arm may be released by flexing it at the elbow by
exerting pressure in the antecubital fossa, and sweeping the hand across the
chest by grasping the wrist.

On occasion, fracturing the humerus may be
necessary, but this injury is preferable to fetal asphyxia .

Avoid the 4 Ps:

                rotate
                flex
                rotate
                 push up (This may tear the mother's womb leading to an infection).
                disengage

SOGC also stated: "IN the presence of shoulder dystocia, the following mnermonic is helpful advice:

    This was adapted from SOGC's Advances in Labour Risk Management (ALARM) course.

SOGC, Chapter 7, Baby Arrives , page 59

SOGC promotes "the general philosophy to promote the family-centered maternity care and state the disruption of the close mother-child relationship during the crucial few hours following birth is to be avoided.  Prolonged early contract is also a positive predictor for success with breastfeeding.  Separation from the mothers immediately after delivery jeopardizes successful establishment of lactation.  It appears that initial prolonged contact of mother and baby is the critical factor."

SOGC states that according to the WHO Guidelines for Baby-Friendly Hospitals, healthy breastfed newborns do NOT require supplementation and the practice of distributing free samples of formula to breastfeeding mothers should be discouraged.

MANAGEMENT AT THE TIME OF BIRTH:

    On the issue of cord clamping, SOGC, state that the proponents of delay suggest the infant receives additional oxygen in the first minutes after birth.  The basic principles of neonatal resuscitation are Dry, Stimulate, and Evaluate.  The blankets surrounding the baby need to be changed so as to be warm and dry.  Handling of the baby should be gentle, with support of the baby's head.

    Apgar scores have been a common measurement index of the first minutes following birth.  The one-minute Apgar correlates with the need for resuscitation, but SOGC allege is not predictive of long-term outcome.

    Comments of Donna Young.  SOGC is indicating the Apgar Score for one minute testing may imply instant/immediate or 30-second clamping, as they state, the five-minute test Apgar has some correlation with long-term outcome and should be repeated at ten minute if less than six at five minutes.  In other reports I have read, a five-minute test, if the cord is not clamped or cut in that time period,  meant that the delayed clamping Apgar score generally indicated the need for not having to revive the child. This was because the baby, personally, received the benefit of almost full placenta blood transfusion into the child's expanding lungs.  Lungs take a lot of blood to do the gas exchange.

    I would think the below six Apgar score would require revival tests from one-minute, then at five minutes, then again ten minutes later, and this would indicated "after revival" the final score that may be added on the child's birth registration form. It would not be true birth record, but one contrived of reviving a compromised child by interrution of the child's circualtion system by incompetent doctors following protocols set at that training hospital. The baby's deprived blood would be skirted off to the hospital's lab for use in researc and the experiments of the week.

    SOGC has stated the need of obstetrical and nursing staff working in Labour and Delivery should be trained in neonatal resuscitation programmes and updated regularly.  This is wise because a Canadian report has indicated one in sixteen babies are being revived, today. No wonder with 30-second clamping now regarded as delayed umbilical cord clamping, when it was at one time trained to mean wait for the placenta to be expelled before any tying off the cord, if done at all.  Correct process is informed choice and telling the parents, no clamping or cutting of the cord is necessary, and has risks to it, if done.  This amputation of the placenta is similar to the circumcision debate.  It, too, has been done for cosmetic removal.  The foreskin, like the membrane of the placenta, is also sent to skin banks.  The circumcised child and the umbilical cut cord, allows for the risk of blood infections.  In fact, over 500,000 babies die annually from infections of the blood by the cut cords. This is according to WHO.

     The Third Stage of Labor , Chapter 8:

    Passive Management, according to SOGC, means immediately after the delivery of the infant, as long as the uterus remains firm and there is no unusually bleeding, watchful waiting until the placenta is separated is the usual practice.  A mother has to reject touching of her body, even those some persons think it is acceptable to rub the fundus of the uterus gently.  SOGC states the tradition of cord traction goes back to Aristotle, who advocated this method as  a means of expediting delivery of the placenta.1

    Placenta Expression, according to SOGC is excessive uterine massage and it should never be used before placental separation lest uterine inversion occur.  Draining* the umbilical cord will diminish the amount of blood left in the placenta and decrease fetal/maternal transfusion, and this is especially important in Rh-negative mothers.

    Comments of Donna Young:  The draining the placenta through the umbilical cord is actually the harvesting of the placenta of the child's deprived and actually robbed placenta blood. The mother is not aware this is even going on, indicating more disrespect to the woman, manipulated in this active management policies done in most hospitals.

    ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE THIRD STAGE OF LABOUR PAGE 61:

    SOGC alleges that the spectre of postpartum haemorrhage, which continues to dominate the management of the third stage, it is widely acceptable to be involved in certain amount of active management to reduce the rates of postpartum haemorrhage and retained placenta.  

    SOGC states that the essential components of active management are the use of oxytocic drugs, early clamping and division of the umbilical cord, as well as controlled cord traction for delivery of placenta.

     EARLY CLAMPING AND DIVISION OF THE UMBILICAL CORD , page 62:

    SOGC acknowledges the internal debates with the medical societies, they state, "Precisely when the umbilical cord should be ligated and divided has been a controversial matter for many years."

    What they are leaving out is informed choice no clamping or cutting of the cord is necessary at all, not a medical need, but a cosmetic choice, the same as circumcision that endangers any child, male or female, this is imposed on. In the matter of the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord, the doctors made up their own rules, outside of civil choice informed choice of the parents, the legal guardians of the child.  

    The defense was allowed by the B.C. Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons, that if a doctor put up an opinion, it was another doctor's discretion or convenience when to clamp off the functioning and pulsating cord, the College would not investigate the endangering as child abuse by any doctor following protocol of policy, even though informed consent to endanger the child was received.  

    What was happening when this hasty clamping was occurring, is that the parents were in shock, at seeing their child not breathing. Following this situation, I have found, in one particular case of an early clamped c-section child, that the child, many years later, was so hyperactive that the parents stopped their plans for more children.  Great population control just by clamping quickly the umbilical cord. The protocol creates hyperactive children who will likely live a lifetime on drugs for manageability.  Many schools won't take children that can't sit still and are like butterflies, here and there and are not manageable.  Home schooling is the option parents often seek. It is not a bad idea and it may avoid drugs to children until their brain cells, get bigger and more discipline guidelines can be "remembered" and safety rules, too.

    SOGC supports active management of the third stage of labor.  Active management to quote them, means, "...entails clamping and dividing the umbilical cord relatively early, prior to the beginning controlled cord traction.  There appears to be general agreement that delayed cord clamping is associated with placental transfusion to the baby varying between 20 and 50 percent of neonatal blood volume, depending on when the cord is clamped and at what level the baby is held prior to the clamping."

    SOGC do KNOW right from wrong.  If the child is held high up, the baby's placenta blood will drain back into the placenta, weakening the baby even more.  If the baby is held low, they testify that the placenta blood, the placenta higher then the baby, allows for faster transfusion into the baby's expanding lungs.

    I question their the medical person's ethics in putting the child in either extreme held positions, both unnatural, to the womb's care of the placenta and the child.  A drugged baby's heart, cannot pump up hill the carbon dioxide blood for the continued gas exchange.  This is because the child is weakened with narcotics of morphine, which is often combined with oxytocin drugs.  

    If the baby is held excessively low the umbilical cord vein is likely dumping into the child's navel area.  It is the baby's pumping heart that has to take the baby's vein blood into the expanding lungs. This is logical it will only be as to how fast the heart is beating, or slowed down by chemical drugs. The heart cut off its blood volume will beat harder to try to get the blood up into the baby's brain and other organs.  If this cannot be done, the baby may suffer permanent brain and cental nervous disorder damage.

    Generally, the birth experience has quickened the heart of the child, so their heart is known to beat faster, in stress of the birth. But now the heart is being compounded in distress if the mother accepts drugs during labor and the during the birth of her child. If the child is cold, not being wrapped in a warm dry towel, the baby may go into hypothermia, quickly. This condition then will jeopardize the blood transfer from the placenta to the expanding lungs.

    Often the mother has given no informed consent of any of their procedures going on.  This is because the doctors think a pregnant female have mental problems and are unstable at the time of labor discomfort, when she is entering a birth institution and the mother had to give control over to the "appropriate care protocols" of those in charge of the birth process at that hospital.  This is if she is to have any help.  

    In the event the baby's blood supply is cut off to create low blood volume, the baby takes one breath and may have a heart attack or stroke. If the baby is only given oxygen for revival and without blood expanders, the child may die of shock.  It is proven that even just 20 percent total blood volume deprived by an early clamped cord can cause a sensitive child to go into shock.  See the case-law precedents used in the Chow-case-law, handled by Roth and Sommers, Ontario Canada.

LOWER HAEMOGLOBIN VALUES , p 62

    SOGC knew by facts of evidence of research that babies who had delayed umbilical cord clamping and I advocate waiting until the placenta is expelled, no tying off the cord for that period of time, if clamped at all, that babies are stronger, by delayed clamping. SOGC states, "Haematological indices confirm that early cord clamping reduces the extent of placental transfusion to the baby. Babies born after early cord clamping have lower haemoglobin values, however, the difference in haemoglobin levels virtually disappears by six weeks of age and is undetectable six months after birth."

    What does that latter statement mean?  It means that SOGC knew the baby was likely in an anemic weakened condition, then, at birth the child was injected with vaccinations of Hep B, and Vit K, and had an needle inserted in any part of the baby's body to do an genetic testing of PKU. All this was done, in most instances, whether or not the parents gave informed consent.  

    What that means is that SOGC knew the babies were likely being taken home in an anemic condition.  SOGC has directly or indirectly admitted the child would remain anemic for up to 6 months of age.  That child may remain anemic, the rest of the child's life, and even more vulnerable to every spurt of growth.  Is it any wonder we have children, under the ages of 15, sick with cancers?  The greatest cancer groups are ages 4 to 40.

    Parents believed they were being good parents by going to the hospitals to birth their babies. Parents believed they were being good parents to vaccinate their babies.  Their trust has been badly breached.  They did not have informed consent what "stuff" was in the chemicals injected into their baby's blood stream and when anemic.

    Some babies were injected six times, on one day, while yet anemic, and vulnerable at two months of age. Some of the babies so injected, had been premature babies.  The vaccination lots, on investigation, were HOT.  See the Yurko Project.  A hot vaccination means they had a heavy metal preservatives, like mercury, by the name of Thimersol.  Parents, like the Yurko Project, were charged with child abuse, and both parents were alleged to have shaken their child. But the father alleged he did no such thing.  He has been in jail, for the past 6 years. His deceased child's body, at 2 1/2 months of age, when the child died in the hospital, was harvested of heart, brain, lung, and other organs.  Is it possible the many injection of rat poison, heparin, was preserving the child's organs, on the pretense the heparin was a medical good for the baby?  

    Herapin, yes, is naturally, produced by our liver, but what of the chemically made heparin, given daily to an impaired child, what does that do for sterilization of organs and tissues if they are intended to be harvested by our trusted medical professional organized groups?

NO ACCOUNTABLE HEADSHIP ON MEDICAL POLICIES AND PROTOCOLS:

    When medical policies and protocols have no public challenge and there is no accountability and/or no headship who is responsible,or some confusion who is responsible, we must have concern where any common duty of respect, belongs.  And, for the right of any individual self-determination and protection when Joint-statements are made by International organizations. Again, they are not accessible or accountable, to anyone, apparently.  And the elected officials, from the local community to the Federal government allege too, they don't know what to do, and you get that from law offices, when you report child abuse, in the hospitals by protocols being followed and not challenged, and duty of factual reporting is not taking place, we are seeing our society becoming powerless to investigate professional status persons.  In China, did the lay persons, organized and deal with them. Didn't the lay persons in France chopped off heads in revolutions, when the common persons were threatened by improper care by rulers becoming greedy for profits.  Power hungry is for profits...wealth, at any persons expense, that the leaders have immunity to what they are doing and how they are treating others they simply exploit.

    This medical movement for taking the baby's placenta blood has no one accountable for questionable policies/protocols.  Those in charge are deceiving the public with false statements they are not harming or endangering the children.  But whose blood was robbed? They are using medical excuses of policies followed blindly as unchallenged protocol.  And, individuals whose baby's were violated have had no help in dealing with the social professional organism being put in place, world wide.  

    I ask, who is in charge?  Anyone know?  Who is  accountable?  Well, I think all medical professional groups, are, collectively and severally.  All medical groups organized for one purpose, protect the members of the public.  I would think that any medical executive group that did not stand back from any one false policies that can be tested endangering to any one person if imposed on them as having vicarious liabilities.  The blood trapped in the placenta is visual evidence being denied. False medical policies and teaching are being allowed to continue in silence by the governing authorities. The taxpayers and even just one member of the public are being exploited. There is increased medical costs now evident highest in the children, under the age of one.  This age group is on par to another group of medically vulnerable persons, needing advocacy too, the senior citizens. These two groups in Canada, have the highest medical costs, of age groups. Both these groups have age, mental and physical disadvantages.  For the babies, they can be further selected to be vulnerable by sex, race, and color combinations for their blood types.  Any blood type can be specifically requested and posted making any one child more vulnerable for stem cell harvesting, then another.

WHO MAKES THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ACCOUNTABLE FOR BOGUS MEDICAL POLICIES AND DIRECTIVES OF CLAMPING OFF THE CHILD'S UMBILICAL CORD, IF A PARTICULAR DRUG IS USED, OXYTOCIN, FOR EXAMPLE?

     Anyone ever try to get a reply by from the World Health Organization or know your OWN Nation's WHO representative?  Who is in charge of these organisms that take our tax dollars, eh?  Who controls any checks and balances? Are there any checks and balances?

    What I yet believe in is that no organized group, even of professional medical persons, can make or enforce their own groups laws to exempt themselves from accountability of the Nation's criminal and civil codes.  It is the obligation of the parents of a violated child, to come forward, to state their child was violated by unconsented interruption of their child's circulation system.  This is harvesting the child, at birth, is perceived to be both a civil and/a criminal violation to the born child, even though, the child lived.  When is battery only an offense, if the victim dies?

    The various medical policies, now world wide, are attempting to cover-butts, by these alleged protocols to avoid accountability when or if followed.  The truth is many medical procedures, when investigated for the facts present, when imposed, prove that neither the mother or the child just born, were at risk to cause the child's placenta cord to be clamped or tied off or hand-squeeze.  

WHOSE DUTY IS IT TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE?

    The medical protocols are used to prevent criminal investigation by the police in each community.  The policies are false alibis needed to deceive the police that there was a medical need to endanger the child to deprive the child of essentials of quality of life, oxygenated blood.  

    There is a myth that only a medical doctor can make a complaint of any endangering to a child.  Most of the medical policies focused that the medical doctor only reported "outside" their own group in reporting child abuse.  We do not do immediate umbilical cord clamping on any other mammal's birth.  Is it we can do medical revival in institutions that we risk harvesting the human child for their palcenta blood? It this ethical, or lawful, or is it a crime against the person, endangering, and causing bodily harm?

    The protocol directing early and immediate cord clamping for taking a pH test, is bogus. What the public does not know is that following immediate cord clamping, the blood in the placenta is not regarded toxic blood, but is, subsequently, drained from the placenta or syringed out and not necessarily burned, but sold for economic benefits of the hospital's operation or the private profits of the medical persons in charge of that child's care.  The billings are to third parties, in some situations, and coded.  The profit of collecting an organ or the blood from it, are often not part of the child's own medical charts of care, or attributed to that child's billing code, but other services rendered in the hospitals mandate for billing fees.  

USE OF THE COURTS FOR ENDANGERING ANY ONE CHILD BY ANY ONE IN THE COMMUNITY, INCLUDING ANY MEDICAL PERSON(S);

    Courts deal with fact, not fears.  You do not interrupt any creature's lifeline for a fear not substantiated in facts of tests.  For any doctor or nurse to be participating in the clamping and/or the amputation of a functioning organ has a duty of obligation of reporting the reasons with facts on the child's own medical charts.  This is NEVER done, world wide on this issue and why not?  There are no films available, that I am aware of, to substantiate no threat or risk to the child by their umbilical cord early clamped.  Nor, showing the child's wrongfuly deprived blood drained from the engorged placenta.  Nor the film on the revived condition of the child.  That we lived revived or in a weakened condition is no good excuse for weakening any one's child.

    When the child is visually seen compromised, some of the hospital's private contractors, doctors, did not keep the proper records of the infant's care, and did not require the testing of the child's placenta blood to confirm forensic evidence of drugs that can compromise a child. They also did not require factual reporting by all who were in the birth room as witnesses of the child's birth.  

     Placenta means, in Greek, flat cake. If the cord is clamped quickly the placenta remains, an engorged placenta-lung-blood-bag in the mother's birth canal.  The wrongfully and illegally deprived blood and nutrients, was, by nature, intended to be transfused into the child's expanding lungs. The duty of the medical persons, is to be competently and ethical trained  One would think a medical person is trained to know their duty of law, civil and criminal and to report child abuse.

CORPORATION CONTROL--THE NEW ORDER?  WHO IS RESPONSIBLE OR ACCOUNTABLE?:     

    Duty to the public, at large.  Duty is to report child abuse or to any person who is vulnerable, even to any dumb animal.  However, many medical persons have apparently feared to challenge another colleagues' methods, if they have a title, as expert.  No medical person is above the law, and the duty is for police to investigate complaints of organized medical policies that risk any one to be in danger.  

    We are seeing an organized threat of the medical persons undermining the base of democracies duty of equal protection and security of person to the individual.  The medical members are assuming their medical protocol are not to be questioned in civil or criminal courts. Who taught them that?

    If I have influenced you, at all, please sign the petitions at:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814   Protect Babies and Mothers, Too  

    All nations are asked to support intervenorship for the Canadian babies who are presently endangered by Policies of SOGC, and in particular, Policy #89 May 2000.  This policy is directing, to be routinely done, immediate cord clamping, on all babies.  SOGC is aware of my concerns, however, they have done nothing to stop this hasty clamping and the questionable training and practice. The doctors, in all the Canadian Provinces, are failing to provide true medical informed consent and the right to safer alternative of care in child birth.

    Please sign this USA Petition to educate the medical persons not to interrupt the infant's circulation system by umbilical cord clamping.

     http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/954816565

home page:   www.lotusbirth.com

    To keep my web sites and research going and assist me with my monthly expenses $231.00 for a web server donations are gratefully received.  My  pension cheque is $239.00 a month. Contact me at:

Donna Young

Natural Birth Education

Box 504

Dawson Creek, BC

V1G 4H4

Canada

tel:  1-250-782-9223

email:  dyoung@pris.ca