bullet1 Unassisted Births, the babies thrive, alleged Dr. Mavis Gunther, UK, 1957.

     9-1-1 Emergency Birth Counsellors , by evidence of messages recorded, in my opinion are endangering babies on the management of the infant's lifeline, the umbilical cord.   In most "Unassisted Births" the babies thrive, alleged Dr. Mavis Gunther, UK, 1957.  This is only if the umbilical cord is not tied off or cut.  These are the views written by Donna Young, Canadian, Mother and Grandmother (See Gunther's article at www.lotusbirth.com  Table of Contents).


    It is true, whether babies are born in a tree, in a bus, in a parking lot, in an elevator, in a plane, on a train, that the babies thrive, when born unassisted.  Many medical persons pretend, they have never heard of unassisted births. It was the rule, rather then the exception, of our Pioneer grandmothers.  We have forgotten our heritage and common sense of natural birth education and practice.  


    This link gives information how babies thrive if born unassisted, free of medical rituals that threaten the well-being of mother and child, in many instances.    http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_151539.html?menu=

    This url for reference is:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-664.htm  May 29, 2004.


    These are some of the unassisted births but the parents did not know of no clamping or cutting of the cord as a primal birth care. Primal birth rights are from the beginning of time.  The duty is on the professional group to advise no harm done to undrugged mothers to have no clamping of the child's cord, ever, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa.  Mistakes of the medical person to be investigated of the last two happened and why.


    Only if the cord tore or for placenta previa (c-section accident of cutting into the cord) need the cord be tied or cut.  And the mothers must be told if they are imposed on with drugs, that the drugs cross the placenta and damage the baby's brain and the medical persons are instructed (bogusally or not) by the World Health Organization to clamp the cord quickly.  The 9-1-1 counsellors, were supposed to be ethically, and competently trained of all facts, and they are advising using anything to tie the cord, making it sound that the tying of the cord was a medical necessity, and it is not, in most instances.  


    Further, the tying off the umbilical cord, with anything handy, like a shoe string is unsanitary risking the child to blood infections, that can be caused by a fast or slow virus.


     The best that 9-1-1 would be just keep the baby warm wrapped in the cleanest towel or blanket possible, and to keep the mother warm too. That is all that is necessary in childbirth, and the same is true for c-section baby, to be removed as a sealed unit, no clamping or cutting of the cord ever, at the informed choice and right of the parents.  Here are the links of any objects being used to tie the cord, a bogus directive by most medical persons today:


9-1-1 directives of cord tying:


9-1-1 was the second call we made," Langham said. "They wanted to know if we were OK and if we had anything we could use to tie the cord." That's when

McGlaughn, 37, finally pulled over. He removed a shoelace from his shoe and tied the cord.

 http://www.thesylvaherald.com/A-hwybaby110200.htm


___________________________________________________


There was no time for the firefighters to administer drugs to Angiuli, so she gave birth naturally.


 http://www.mi-reporter.com/sited/story/html/99155

___________________________________________________


The boy dialed up a  911 operator on the family's cordless phone. He followed the operator's instructions, fetching towels for his mother, then pulling out his own shoelace so he could use it to cut the umbilical cord.


http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/GoodMorningAmerica/Gma010313Emergency_birth.html

_____________________________________________________________________________


A 911 operator up in Concord told Mr. Battle to get towels and a shoe lace for the birth, and coached him on what to do. Soon, he saw Avery being delivered.


Mr. Battle was able to cut the umbilical chord and both Battles were able to travel via ambulance to Anna Jacques Hospital in Newburyport. That's where Avery, who weighs 8 pounds, was scheduled to be born 10 days later.



http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20001221/NH_001.htm

___________________________________________________________


There was no time for the firefighters to administer drugs to Angiuli, so she gave birth naturally.


 http://www.mi-reporter.com/sited/story/html/99155

_________________________________________________


An ambulance arrived six minutes after his wife gave birth and cut the umbilical cord, The Evening Post reports.


Tracy said: "I panicked a bit, but at the time everything happened too quickly.


http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_308429.html?menu=

___________________________________________________________


NO assistance at all, child born in a tree:  NO one was there to direct bogus policies on tying off the cord or cutting it.  

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_151539.html?menu

____________________________________________________


EMERGENCY OR NORMAL CONTROLLED BIRTH -- FACTS WHAT TO DO AFTER THE BABY IS BORN:  

  •     WARMTH IS ESSENTIAL TO PREVENT HYPOTHERMIA TO MOTHER AND THE CHILD:  Do keep the mother and the baby warm. Have the mother birth in the warmest and cleanest room possible.

  •     Immediately after the baby is born, do wrap the baby in the warmest cleanest towel possible, and do nothing with the cord, unless the cord tore (dropped baby).  There is no factual or medical need to tie the cord, ever, unless the cord tore.  No need to cut the cord, ever, unless for the same reason.

  •     If the cord is around the neck put a finger between the neck and the cord to prevent neck injury. Do not cut the cord. See the severally impaired child, of the Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law of which professional doctors interrupted the child's circulation system in each case.

  •     MULTIPLE BIRTHS:  Do not clamp the cord for a twin, to cut it to put it aside for the next child to be born.  That is a violation of shared blood the twins have created and each twin will take of the blood as to his/her own needs as to their individual size.  That is how they shared the blood of one placenta in the womb, and it is no different after the birth.
  •     If a person cannot have an aid for twins to hold the child, however, long it takes for the next child to be born, wrapped in a warm cloth, and no tension on the cord, they are not adequately or skillfully trained to be dealing with any child's birth.  In 1934,  the Dionne quintuplets, were born near Callander, Ontario, in Canada.  The Dionne sisters were an assisted birth delivered in the family home, on a farm.  All lived because likely the country doctor was competently trained not to clamp the pulsating cord. Other multiple births, delivered by c-sections, have not lived, likely because most c-section doctors and staff are trained to clamp the cord, then cut the cord, then remove the baby or babies.  The babies are weakened by that fact of early cord clamping, and they do not get the transfusion of blood into the expanding lungs, as do most vaginal birthed babies, as was the case of the Dionne sisters.

  •      Normal color of the newborn neonate is blue:   Don't worry that the baby is blue because all babies are born bluish, as to their fetus' circulation system. They will turn pink when they have the placenta blood transfused into their expanding lungs, and take their breathe at their time space.  

  •     All babies are breathing through the cord, not through their mouth, or nose.  IF THE CORD IS NOT BEATING, NEITHER MAY BE THE CHILD'S HEART.  IT IS ESSENTIAL THEN TO REVIVE THE BABY WHERE IS, HOW IS, YET LEFT ON THE UMBILICAL CORD, UNCLAMPED.

  •     The babies are receiving oxygenated blood if the placenta is not pulled away from the placenta. That oxygenated blood will begin if the baby's heart begins to beat again, with massage.  

  •     That pulling away of the placenta comes after the transfusion of the placenta blood into the baby's lungs.  The cord may continue to beat, even up to 20 minutes, even after the placenta is expelled. (See reference, Mavis Gunther).  It is important to be patient and don't faint to look at the placenta. If you don't faint in the meat department, you should not faint at the sight of the placenta.  See Ode to My Placenta by Dr. Sarah Buckley, www.lotusbirth.com.

  •     Wipe the baby's face and mouth with clean washed hands or a clean small towel. Do not gag the baby with rough syringing bulbs, as they can gag the child and give it a heart attack or stroke.  

  •     Wait for the placenta to be born and put the placenta, yet attached to the baby, in a clean diaper or warm towel.

  •     Keep both the baby and the placenta, warm, don't allow the baby or placenta to get cold. Hypothermia may set in, and that can happen in cold hospital rooms, too. Some hospitals have been known to keep the rooms cool for the convenience and comfort of the staff which is not in the best interest of the mother or child.  This is because the cold air stops the blood transfusing into the child's expanding lungs, too.  The motive is questionable, if the policy of the hospital is to sell the placenta and placenta blood trapped in the placenta. A cold room works the same way as the cold steel of the clamp..stopping, prematurely, the child's circulation system.  

  •     It is, again, imperative to keep baby and placenta warm.  That is primal gentle birth, and the rules should NOT change if you should get to the hospital in time. Why would you want to, eh?  This is when the fate will be active management leading to, in most instances, harvesting of the baby's placenta and placenta blood.  Unknown to the mother and father, who are not paying any attention to the after-birth, the after-birth is worth more then the child.  Because it can be ground up and extracted by centrifugal machines, extracting valuable interferon, hormones, enzymes, nutrients, deprived the baby.  The parents are only happy with a "living" baby, and show, by lack of education, concern the baby was harvested by ploys and patterns and bogus medical policies that directed opportunity to harvest the baby, by lack of education of most parents, today, as was true of the last 3 and 4 generations of trusting parents.  We do not question the doctor's training, as we ought to, or learn about the tricks of the trade of the medical arts and crafts.  They are crafty, in my opinion, and dishonest, and must be dealt with by due process of law.  

  •      What is a Conspiracy :   By law, and in any Nation, it is described (paraphrased) as when two or more medical cell-groups make their own policies, that are not a benefit to the medical consumer (patient). Or, are not necessary to be done and are risk taking not a benefit to the recipient of the care given.   And by criminal definition, if someone can get hurt by a needless medical policy, it is called a conspiracy.  

  •      Different Courts, criminal and Civil:  Discipline can be civil for compensation when a person, injured can not be restored to the condition he/she ought to be in, if the bogus medical practices was not imposed.  Criminal court is then followed up, for discipline of a reckless policy, visually seen not logical or reasonable as to the situation.  Again, only if the cord tore or for placenta previa, might a cord be clamped as a seen benefit to the child, but the duty would be to restore the placenta blood into the owner/infant as quickly as possible (see Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, by Sommers and Roth).

  •      One court process is used (civil) to get compensation to violated trusting members of the public, and the other is to discipline with jail sentences of bogus allowance of medical policies and the leaders and government officials that allowed this harvesting to go on.  An example of victims of a medical crime, alleged, is the RCMP Blood Force, Canada.  This Task force has charged criminal negligence on USA doctors and private corporations, and on Canadian doctors, and government officials.  The Blood Force followed the Krever Report on the contaminated blood used for Canadians, supplied in some instances by USA citizens.  The criminal charges extended across the borders, apparently.  You can find the current standing on the internet.  Lawyers were saying,"Gee, don't charge the doctors with criminal offenses. Just go after the insurance policies." In other words the doctors were never being made to personal pay for voluntary decisions and choices as reasoning adults, that ought to be able to think standing on their feet, eh!

  • And to go on, for so long, undetected, to the public, until internet allowed communication of such issues, to be open discussion among the common members of the public. These are the persons, like me, with titles only of, Mother and Grandmother, that experts of a certified degree, do not pay any attention to.  Politicians pay no attention because one person here and there are not a threat to their getting elected, again, year after year.

    

  •     YOU don't have to accept active management. This ritual of drugs and gadgets, in most instances, and scanning (sometimes, if the baby is not moving, scans may be good) can be very harmful to babies and mothers, in most instances. The state of the art may be questionable.  Our grannies didn't need these fancy gadgets and thing-a-ma-jigs.  And in my opinion, if we are truly emancipated, having a vote and all and careers in almost all professions, then we are made free to insist on having  truthful information.  We can birth normally, and naturally, and revive primal birth traditions, now called lotusbirth.

  •     Mothers do not have to sign appropriate care forms, in order to have natural births in hospitals.  This is when she knows nothing about what that means...she does not have to turn over her body or her baby's to any State controlled and questionably trained medical persons, of either sex, male or female. We must question why some of those of our same sex, career medical females, have not spoken up about bogus policies controlling a woman's birth, eh?

_____________________

9-1-1 MEDICS MAY NOT BE COMPETENTLY TRAINED ON THE FETUS/NEONATE CIRCULATION SYSTEM:

    The child may be endangered if the family calls and receives the endangering directions by 9-1-1, too, as to directives of tying of the umbilical cord, when it is not torn.

  

    The counsellors of 9-1-1 are, in my opinion, bogusally trained.  They are consistently endangering the child, as evident in the stories in the above link. The risk to the child are blood infections by directing to tie the cord with any kind of unsterilized string.  The 9-1-1 counsellors are making it sound like the tying of the umbilical cord is an imperative medical need to the child.  That is not true.  That is bogus training and directives to any one member of the public at large is endangering to both the mother and the child.


     The 9-1-1 medics and counsellors are misdirecting the public, at large. This may be considered criminal common nuisance, as to the heads and persons directing that teaching, if any one citizen is threatened by a bogus teaching or directive. This, again, may be regarded as mischief of serious harm of blood infections, tetanus, for example.  Such blood infections, through a filthy object used to tie the cord, or cut it, when the cord is not torn, can cause the painful death of a child, weeks, later.  The cause would be the cord tied by causing a virus entry where the tied cord allowed a possible virus to enter the child's blood stream.


    The facts are that over 500,000 babies are reported by the World Health Organization to have died by complications of infections of a cut cord . The deaths happen in Western hospitals, too, of blood infections.   Again, cutting the cord, or clamping it, is not a necessary procedure, ever, at all, again, unless the cord tore. Or, in emergency c-section, the doctor, by mistake, cut into the placenta or the cord as for a case of placenta previa.


FACTS OF HARMFUL TEACHING OF EMERGENCY BIRTHS IN CANADA, directing clamping on a pulsating cord, a trend, a dangerous trend:

    In British Columbia, Canada, the BC Justice Institute has the Province's contract for emergency birth training, of medical medics. They also contract, I'm told, for other Provinces and areas, as well. They are apparently contracting to do all that is consistently trained in the USA, and are using some of the American textbooks.


    The evidence of bogus teachings are at many of the Medical Training courses offered by private enterprise. In BC, some of the textbooks used are from the Canadian Red Cross and the BC Workman's Compensation Board. Both were silent when I sent them emailed-letters, as a concerned Canadian citizen, questioning them why they were teaching a bogus threatening policy of clamping a functioning pulsating organ.  How come? The trend of endangering to the child and the mother, was permitted and allowed by Health Canada, that has funds for the over-all-care of Canadians, and the Registrar, Dr. Van Andle, of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC (CPS-BC).


    The bogus training is something for the fact finding of a court complaint to find out the organization and motive for this bogus training. It seems to be leading to the harvesting of babies of their interferon (fights all kinds of viruses) and stem cells, and other nutrients of whole blood that are trapped in the placenta by early clamping.


    This harvesting of the baby's own properties is improper and should be dealt with as would be any organized crimes by any organized medical cell groups, in my opinion.  It is improper for the professionals groups to organize in this way, trapping uneducated mothers, and organizing bogus information in emergency manuals and in biology textbooks, and references books in most public libraries.


    The improper information should be sought to be removed by Court Order, as is necessary, if not voluntarily done, for any textbooks demonstrating harmful back and semi-sitting birth positions, and early clamping, and injections of the mother or child, with "stuff" the mother is not informed can endanger her well-being, and cross the placenta and endanger the baby's tiny liver, and spleen, and brain and central nervous system.  


    In the case of the BC Justice Institute, they were advised, with proper medical references I had provided, that tying off or cutting the umbilical cord was not necessary procedure, at all, unless the cord had torn. One medical emergency instructor was told to continue to teach early clamping of the pulsating umbilical cord as was directed in the medical textbook she was using as an instructor, that also advocated placing the mother to birth on her back.


    Those Provincial Government agents, I spoke to, willfully intended not to check out that information, or even look at the visual facts of science and of good medicine.  Were they being willfully blind?  That is for a judge to decide eh, should the issue get to a court for criminal allegations of negligence or for civil financial compensation, or both actions taken.


    This information, offered, is not based in opinion but visual, evident in all other placenta birthing mammals. The human child, a mammal, is no exception. But an dumb animal has more concern by the public, then a damaged living child.  The facts are, the BC Justice Institute's, civil servants and those in charge, continued, in my opinion, negligently, to continue in bogus medical directives.


    The bogus policies are true in the USA and a recent birth history, the mother is raising a very serious injured child, that bled excessively, after the cord was tied off, and came untied.  The link above indicates that a 9-1-1 medics in the U.S.A., are being directed to clamp off the pulsating cord, or tying it off at any time, even if the placenta was birthed, too, the after birth.  And using highly questionable objects to tie off the cord, means to have endangered the child to the risk of viruses and blood poisoning or a virus that can be slow or fast acting in the blood system - a virus-time-bomb so to speak, not to mention brain lesions.


    The BC Justice Institute, and others in the USA, providing medical 9-1-1 counselling, were allowing any dirty shoe lace to be used.  This is so frightening, on a society that emphasized, at one time, cleanliness in child birth. They seem to be forgetting, cleanliness is imperative not to risk a virus getting into the child's blood stream.

    

    Why take unnecessary endangering chances with another's child's well-being, eh? Why they are doing this, is that it is believed that the emergency care providers are not responsible for what they do and say. However, these emergency care providers are not the average Joe on the Street, nor the 9-1-1 counsellors. They have had training, so why would they not be covered by someone's liability insurance for error of judgment of unnecessary directives and risking damage to another's child.


    It would be up to the Courts to decide if paid medical trained persons come under the Good Samaritan Act, and are not accountable for voluntary actions imposed on the care of a birthing mother or her child.  It would be up to the Courts to decide if this is malicious endangering of another person, and can be regarded an unncessary risk taking with no benefit to the child, unless the cord had torn and unncessary risks to the mother, too, all facts known to the Court.


    It appears only when the instructors and authors and publishers of bogus training that is holding the bogus policies of experts, are taken to court for Common Nuisance, that endangers any one person to the threat of bodily harm, will this false directions stop.  Or, when a injured child's Next Friend, takes issue of medical persons to court for compensation to the victims, will the following bogus policies and those have imposed them on the child endangering both mother and child, will false teachings stop.  


    The bogus teachings were first directed of early clamping by the experts, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) by Policy #216 November 1995; ((This policy was quietly cancelled as of Jan/Feb 2002)  However, it seems that ACOG's sheep, their associates in Canada, were backing them up, too, with their bogus policies based in the bogus reasons of ACOG, to do a pH test as the reasons for early clamping.


    The Society of Obstetricians and Gyncologists, told me too, they knew of my concerns of their bogus teachings, but they too, like the 9-1-1 medics and the BC Justice Institute were continuing to promote a false teaching of clamping off the pulsating and functioning umbilical cord. SOGC bogus policy, still in effect is Policy #81, May 2000, and they have knowingly endangered the child by hasty clamping of 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, stated in Policy #71, December 1998, taking 6 weeks to 6 months to recover that deprived blood. The child is anemic in that time period, and in an anemic condition are subjected to injections of "stuff" that mothers know not what is in the "stuff" injected into the tiny child's system, and many diseases injected at one time.


    This is public mischief, in my opinion, and I wonder whose side they are on, a cell groups control of endangering even one member of our citizens, by failing in prevention, or on the side of political profits, of which governments earn greater income by higher salaried professional groups that earn income off the sick.  Well, that is one motive, when no logic is known for endangering babies, and their mother too.  See the Petition below to protect babies and mothers, too.

_________________________________________


NOT GETTING TO THE HOSPITAL ON TIME:


    The word of caution is it may be best if you didn't get to the hospital on time to birth your baby on their premises. Getting there on time, may be like going into the spider's den, eh; or to call the 9-1-1 medics too soon, or let their medics into your place, without them signing a Birth Contract, to leave the umbilical cord alone.  These are my thoughts on this and from personal experience, as well others who have known first hand as to the deception of bogus reasons of midwives and female doctors clamping the child's umbilical cord, while it was still pulsating, and other medical persons, too. One such mother is presently seeking alternative care for a severely damaged child after the ambulance medics attempted to tie off the child's umbilical cord with just anything handy, then cut the cord, and the cord became untied, and they took 6-hours to clean up the blood in the ambulance.  The hospital and medics are presently denying accountability to a child, not expected to live a quality life. The little girl is now 15 months old but not able to walk, or feed without a tube.  


    The most recent bogus alibi for clamping off a functioning, pulsating umbilical cord is "fear of the mother bleeding."  Why is this?  Well, if they are not doing the endangering for the benefit of the baby, they are using a bogus reason, the decision to deprive the baby of his/her placenta blood (up to 60 percent) was a need to spare the mother's life.  However, it is a bogus alibi for no evidence was factual that the mother was actually in any danger.  It is a bogus alibi meant to prevent criminal investigation and charges of a threat (assault) to the child, even if the child lived.


    There are facts in two known cases, of negligence of expert medical training and care.  One incident happened in the Markham area of Ontario, Canada and other case happened in Florida, USA.  The mothers were not knowingly drugged with pitocin, oxytocin, syntocinon, Toesen, with consequences of hasty clamping required, (World Health Organization).  Nor, were the mothers knowingly anemic; nor were the mothers observed bleeding at the time the child's umbilical cords were clamped, early in the child's birth.


     Motive...It is possible these women medical persons were intending to harvest European babies' blood.  One of the violated children was born in May and the other in June of the year 2003. These are my thoughts on this, and both situations, yet, need to be before a judge, or so I believe. When the mothers are better educated of the violation and constitutional disrespect to their child, the courts may yet hear of these children endangered, or violated by even one drop of blood deprived before nature intended the placenta blood flow to stop. The court may hear of the violations of the child by relatives or those acting as Next Friend to the child, if the natural parents do not perceive or report their child endangered, needlessly, and with a bogus reason not discussed, to check out the fact it was an indeed, bogus training and alibi practiced by deceptive persons in the medical fields of child birth. There are many bogus reasons of clamping off the child's cord, when the completion of the child's birth has not been allowed.  All children including c-section babies can remain as to what I call, a biological, reciprocal, sealed-unit.  (See T. Peltonen's research, this web site, Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com ).

_______________________


NATURAL BIRTHS ARE AS SIMPLE AS 1-2-3 AND IN MOST INSTANCES AND THAT IS 93 TO 95 PERCENT OF MOST BIRTHS, AS WERE THE DAYS OF OUR GRANDMOTHERS WHO BIRTHED UNASSISTED, ON THE FARMS, PRIOR TO THE 1920'S:

    More mothers-to-be, must learn first thing after knowing she is expecting is how to deal with an emergency birth. Natural birth is a simple as 1-2-3.  Just let baby be, whether a premature birth, or full term. The birthing mother must let her body act naturally, and to change her position, during birth, as freely and often as possible, her choice.  If in the hospital, the mother is wise to do things normally, eat and drink beverages and move around, not subject her self-to IV hook-ups, that are said to prevent dehydration.  What they do by this bogus excuse, is switch a questionable Ringer's solution to narcotics and oxytocin, pitocin. The mother is unaware of the dangers of any drugs during labor, to herself and her child. The after affects are subtle in developing, like thyroid problems.  In some cases, there are immediate complications of the mother's heart not contracting correctly, and that may be true for the child, as well.


    The mother must not allow anyone to position her on her back or in a semi-sitting position. This is criminal negligence, in my opinion, and it may be a power play, for a person to control the birth results.  Both these positions cause harm to both the mother and the child, by closing the birth canal up to 30 percent. That can lead to cutting of the mother's body, an episiotomy, or breaking the mother's hip bones or the child's collar bone. Pulling on the child or twisting the child or pushing the child back into the birth canal, are dangerous and bogus care and treatment to the child and the mother during birth.  One mother, in the Langley, BC area, almost died as the result of womb injury as to the medical persons pushing her child back into her womb, for a face up birth position.  This new mother got a serious infection and she is now beginning to walk again. Her child was born in the fall of 2003. This mother yet fears for her life and has not started an action for improper care of her person, by pushing back her son into her womb, causing the infection.  Or, it may be they had pressed on her stomach and pulled on the cord, to cause likely a womb inversion.  It is not specifically clear what the improper care was but both those risk taking are known to be set in bogus birth policies.


    That unnecessary roughness is not called for, in my opinion.  This is mostly avoidable if the mother is educated to birth in a gravity birth position, or in warm water, ideally.  The warm water births were deemed approved back in 1998, in the "good" of Policy #71, December 1998 of SOGC, and the fact they approved gravity birth positions, and acknowledged faster and unimpaired blood flow from the placenta into the baby's expanding lungs.  The rest of the care of early cord clamping in Policy #71, is bogus, and endangering to the child.

    

    The expecting mothers ought to be educated to try out a various gravity birth positions.  They ought to trust themselves and to flow with nature and trust themselves, more then invasive child birth methods, as is presently taught those in Canada and the USA in active management policies. The hospitals favor the control by active managed births, using drugs, that the nurses are not allowed, in most instances, to share the known side effects. They seem to be working for a profit-picture, political concepts, in creating higher fees and billings for those working in the medical system, and at that particular hospital, private or public.


    Mothers, are only getting unbiased information, by those not tied into the politics of birth management on the internet.  Here on the internet, mothers are encouraged to practice positions that put them off their butts, to quote Dr. Tod Gastaldo, the only, so far, chiropractor, telling the facts the way it is, and by visual facts of evidence, known since 1913, stay off your butt in child birth.  Safe positions for child birth are squatting, and even sitting forward on the toilet is good, or birthing in a warm water tub, is best of all.


    A birth mother is wise to avoid the leaning back birth chairs often used by midwives, they give power and control to a midwife, who may be unethical or unqualified in leaving the placenta cord alone, and the child is at the risk of the midwife or other medical persons clamping the pulsating cord, by bogus fears, the midwives are trained to tell the mother, in acceptance of a bogus reason to clamp the pulsating cord.  That is not informed consent, so the training of medical persons are saying a fear (bogus fear), and then asking, "OK, I do this?"  


    That is not true informed consent. The trainers and licensing body of any certified or licensed medical person must be more alert to bogus fears imposed on mothers during the birth of her child.  It is unethical means to say, "consent" given.  It is not, and such means to do things to a child or the mother's care, is as bogus as appropriate care forms for treatment and discarding of the placenta, are bogus too.  Why?  Because they are unclear what is happening.  For example discarding the placenta and the placenta's contained blood, by appropriate methods can be using the placenta and blood for transplantation, research, or cosmetics. This is a violation of some person's faith, if discarding is not witnessed burning.  


    Also, Appropriate care and treatment may mean a bogus policy of early clamping and allowing the harvesting of the babies born at that hospital. The harvesting can be by private extra billings of the doctor for finding this child's blood type is prime and worth $30,000 by the ounce for interferon or stem cells extracted from the placenta blood, trapped there by a clamp.  Or the harvesting can be the salvage of the organ given to the hospitals labs for them to profit by the harvesting of the placenta membranes, cord, used in tissue blood banks for burn victims, and also the placenta and placenta blood used in extraction of the substances in cells and blood tissue.


    The 9-1-1 counsellors and emergency counsellors did not always tell the persons aiding an emergency birth to tie off or cut off the cord. They use to tell them leave the cord alone, just put a finger between the neck and the cord, if the cord is around the neck until the cord was long enough and flexible to unwind from the neck or body, without tying it off or cutting it.  Wisdom has changed to back bogus policies that trap blood in the placenta that is later harvested. The directions of the 9-1-1 medics, when they arrive, are clamp the pulsating cord, make the mother comfortable, then cut the cord, then if the placenta is born, to put it in a sterile environmental bag, sealed, and return that property to become the property of the hospital, to now do as they please, with it. They will do preliminary investigation of the placenta...but then harvest it, not necessarily destroy it by burning.


    The hospital likely has a contract with a organ transplant tissue organization that picks up the placenta with other organs, stored in the coolers of the hospital.  Most hospitals do not do incinerating of the organs any more, the good of them are deemed the right of the hospital and the state to harvest them, and do as they please without informed consent.  The checking of the ethics committee and the date of approval to use organ and tissues, is a matter of record of that particular hospital and they allowed a rule of their own-making, no informed consent.  


    The community hospitals have to be investigated on a one to one case, and the general association of hospitals adopting no informed consent, will lead to the major hospital associations following similar patterns and policies.  This will be in each Nation, and who had it first.  Likely the USA and Britain.  Just a guess. But dates of a such approval have a way of having a paper trail.  The investigative research is done under access to information of general policies in your hospital, in your community, then what the State, Province, Territories are doing that is a organized medical cell-group pattern.  Only the members of the public were not informed.  Top Secret.  What you do not know will not hurt you, eh.  But it is a violation of trust, breached by this secrecy and no informed choice.


    I repeat, informed consent as to the alleged crises, when there is no good reason to interrupt the child's circulation system, is in a signed birth contract, of what is not to be done to a child or mother.  See Birth Contract suggestions.  The birth contract, signed, should not be longer then a legal page, are the suggestions, at this web site, www.lotusbirth.com, Table of Contents.  


    If the institute will not sign the birth contract or the medical persons, that may be involved in the child's birth, think seriously, of birthing in your own home, with only family members present, they not interfering with the mother's birth contract.  Or, think about having an immediate Chamber Meeting with a Supreme Court Judge, as to possible endangering by unknown intent of the doctors, and the institute not qualifying their intentions of care to the mother or the child, during or after the birth of the child.  That can't say, we intend to do this, "okay."  NO, can be the reply by the expecting mother.  Mothers-to-be, must not be pressured into another touching her body, invasively, poking needles into her, putting her to ruthless examinations that cause an abortion, and injecting stuff into her or her baby, at any time.


    Those are my recommendations when doctors are militant to maintain control over a natural event birth of a child's care. Both male and female doctors are becoming militant to power play and maintain control and an authority over another's person. They cannot legally do that.  It was proved in the UK, that not even a Judge can order a mother's body cut, to birth her baby or her babies.  (See References at www.lotusbirth.com).


    Remember, our pioneer-grandmothers had no fancy gadgets.  And, modern mothers today, are not under any obligations to use the State of the Art practices or training of doctors today, either.  All this availability of technology are merely suggestions to use only, and not an order to do so. That would be undermining the Constitution and common and natural laws, that the person determines themselves what is or is not done to their person.  The Constitution that honour God's laws, are that the natural parents, not the State, or the medical agents, are not the power of authority over the care and treatment of the child, the parent's rule, that which can or cannot be done.  


    The facts perceived of due process of law, are that the expecting mothers do have the legal rights to decline what should be only suggested care and treatment, not an order of care.  Many medical persons say, I will induce you.  NO they can't order such a treatment. They can suggest and they ought to be saying the dangers of the care and treatment, as to side effects and threat to both the mother and child for her informed decision. If information is left out that is not a "informed" decision, and legal action may then follow for compensation of violations to true informed consent.


    The logical reasons for declining care and treatment is because the State of the Art and drugs given the birthing mother are not checked for the probable cause of one in sixteen babies being revived at birth and also having minor to major birth defects.  (Ref.  Inquiry Into Life, Sylvia S. Mader).  One in four persons have heart problems.  


    It is perceived tumors and cancers began as birth traumas linked with active management policies. Such practices are known to distress both the mother and the child, needlessly.  (See, Chapter, Time Bomb, pages 48-50, of The Magical Child, this web site, www.lotusbirth.com).


     The motive of active management, fearful in most instances, may be to cause such fear in the mother, thus her child.  The child then releases hormones and germ and virus fighters (interferon), and stem cells, and enzymes. These were intended for the benefit of the owner/infant.  But they are deprived the child by early cord clamping.  The suspensions in the blood plasma are then extracted by draining the placenta blood into collection bags.  Then, by using high-tech centrifugal machines, the child's whole blood suspensions are extracted and later sold to the highest bidder on the open market. There is always some kind of a paper trial that criminal investigation or civil litigation can trace the activities of most hospital's expenses and incomes.  


    The parents, blindly trusting the system, unless they file a Writ for Discoveries, may then never see the codes for billings and incomes of such secretive policy of earnings, believed participated in by most hospitals, in all communities, world wide. Only by using the legal system, criminal or civil, will bogus policies of active management cease, and we will see, again truly healthy babies, those that do not get fat, or have internal troubles, sleep disorders, learning and behavior problems as are epidemics of today, the medical persons are saying, they don't know the cause.  Well, they ought to know the prevention of any internal disorders, eh?


    Active management as to what I personal experienced, as is true of the past 3 and 4 generations of mothers, is really inappropriate and unethical training.  This is because most mothers-to-be are uneducated on their own reproduction system and what is healthy unassisted child birth.  Most mothers were conned as to be naive and having blind trust.  What was actually pulled on them was a surprise attack. Most mothers have been put into a caused state of fear, in which most mothers birthing had no time to get second opinions as to policies being imposed on them.


     Most  of their care during labor and the child's birth was being paid by the government's medical health plan, or by private insurance agents of medical practices.  Those assisting in the child's birth, if they wanted more acceptance to be in the birth room, do not tell the truth either, or speak up that there is no real danger, to cause the child to be risked to early umbilical cord clamping, or to be drugged, during of after birth, or injected with needles for blood samples, or injected with Vit. K, and Hep B.  These injections can have questionable and unknown "stuff" in them, not known to the mother, like Hep B has had mercury preservatives in it.  Vit K is given because they have caused the child to have fewer platelets by early umbilical cord clamping. Children not clamped of their cord do not need Vit. K.


    If you have a similar case story of collaboration of medical persons, I'd like to hear from you (dyoung@pris.ca).  These medical persons, and their policies they are following, and who set them as mandatory imposing on the birthing mothers, are deserving of an inquiry. Such inquiries can be legally done before a Court of law. The Court can wield power over unreasonable and bogus reasons to endanger even "one" drop of blood stopped flowing into the child's expanding lungs.  The Court can question even one needle inserted into the newborn's skin, shortly after birth, for a sample of blood taken, or injections of stuff into a new born baby's body. Our pioneer grandmothers did just fine with none of such stuff that is invasive and bogus and all adds up to a $4 Billion needles birth practices, when all that is needed is a rented room and the mother in charge of what is or is not done to her person, for options of primal traditions, or simple warm water tub births.  That the nurses are not educated on primal birth and warm water births is yet a mystery, since SOGC, back in 1998, encouraged them, and gravity birth positions, too.


    Any early clamping on a functioning organ, or one that will function again (heart restarted), ought to be reported as endangering to the child, and to the mother, too.

_________________


     $20 BILLION SPENT ON BIRTHS IN USA for  4 MILLION BIRTHS, ANNUALLY, SHOULD BE QUESTIONED AS TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT DAMAGING CHILDREN AND MOTHERS  ARE REPORTING VERY BAD BIRTH EXPERIENCES, TOO: (The COST of care and treatment to the under 500,000 births in Canada are not known.  

     The only endangering to the natural births, undrugged, is a lost budget for unnecessary medical interventions to the financial reward of those imposing questionable birth policies, called randomized clinical studies to support active management.  In the reported studies, a few medical persons organized and made a policy or study, and then have tried to use their controlled bias to make it a policy of rights to be imposed on uneducated mothers. (See Active Management, First Choice, at the Cochrane Library Resources).


    Other sources of medical journals have called this a conspiracy group.  That may be of other medical journals, too, where access to their information is controlled by paid memberships, and where open discussions and challenges to their medical reports are not open to comments from any member of the public, at large. If the consumer of medical policies and practices and equipment cannot be heard, what kind of democracy is that that permits such power to a private organized political group, that expect payment from the taxpayer's purse, eh? Or, by the medical insurance plans, that may have vicarious liabilities if they are paying for endangering and questionable practices in birth, when childbirth can be natural. The only precaution the mother might seek, is to birth in a rented room, in a hospital, close to help, if required and requested.


    The intentions of clinical studies are thought to be evidence base-studies. My reading of them, have found they lack important information to make an informed decision as to the accuracy of the report.  What the clinical studies seem to be is they are merely witnessed studies of a control group.  I have seen that the mothers in the controlled group, were not given all information, such as the study done by Judith S. Mercer.  For some reasons unknown, the mothers were only given a choice of 30-second clamping or immediate cord clamping; and never told of no clamping of the cord, ever, for any birth, or size of baby.  Why not?  The 30-second clamping then apparently became the new standard of care, called delayed clamping, when true delayed clamping is not 30-second clamping, but waiting for the after-birth, the placenta to be naturally expelled, and all pulsation of the cord stopped. This means the cord's condition, if the child is born in a warm room and wrapped in a warm towel, is white/silver, limp and not pulsating.  Early clamped cords, if the child is born in a warm room, is red, firm and pulsating, and I believe that to be criminal assault, and unreasonable to a skillfully trained and competent person.  The courts must reason too of the interference of the child's circulation system.


    Changes of the child's blood, or the pH of the blood plasma,  can be caused by drugs or sickness of the mother, during gestation. But it is still believed, more blood as the child created, is best left alone for the child's own means to purify the drugged blood. Allowing even the drugged blood may be preferred, rather then work in a weakened anemic condition.  The better choice is natural undrugged birth because all drugs go immediately to the child's brain and can cause brain lesions, by destroying the brain's delicate membranes.  


    An anemic baby is still subjected to low blood volume and lack of oxygen and blood to the baby's brain, brain injury is likely to be caused to drug babies and early clamped babies.  The options are natural birth, the exemption is emergency needed c-sections.  But most c-sections happened after active management offered as the only choice, in most hospitals today, and for political reasons, believed based in profits, and collecting the placenta blood.


    The early clamped babies, will, be, of visual facts, caused to be shy of whole blood nutrients.  More blood is useful to clear up contaminations of drug impurities, such drugs given when mothers given no options of other options when having a vaginal birth.  Drugs, on the other hand may not be avoidable in c-section births.


    Early clamped children may not get all their natural hormones that are ever present to continued growth and for our emotions, too.  Who is to say that the same-sex couples were not violated at birth of being robbed of the hormones and enzymes, causing them to be as they are.  Hormones help us to control our emotions and even to the attraction of the opposite sex. That this problem seems more pronounced today, can it be the chemicals and early clamping during child birth?  

___________________________________

    

    POLITICAL POLICIES IMPOSED TAKING AWAY INFORMED CHOICES AND RIGHT OF DECLINING OF MEDICAL POLICIES:

     The mothers are told this is policy, you have to submit, or forced to sign "appropriate care forms" to get any help at all in the controlled institutions. The facts of a Democratic society, as to the Nation's laws and contract to the common people is that the birthing women must be informed she does not have to submit to anything, not even a c-section, if she says, "No."  Nor can medical professionals elect to inject stuff into her body, or into her baby, or scan her child.  


    We have one in sixteen babies with unknown subtle to serious defects. No proper inquiry of any such minor to serious defects have been allowed to be traced back to the state of the art care given.  These policies of care have not been adequately followed up when the baby was put under investigative research, scans, etc., and those doing the research, are often performed by medical students required to use this questionable equipment on the embryo, or fetus.  Most mothers are not informed of the risks associated with the high technology and have not sued for any form of defect on her child, likely caused by interrupting the cells division or multiply stage when the child was scanned.  The skill of the person scanning, the length of period of the scan, and the reason for the scan are not well known.  Most mothers, who are older, fear a deformed child, but are not told about a perfectly healthy child, made mentally deficient by the scanning and injections, and early clamping.  They have beautiful babies, but have learning and behavior problems, the rest of their life.  Is active management worth the risk. I say no, as to choices of natural birth education, primal birth traditions, that mothers can and must be told they can refuse modern state of the art now known as active management.  You will note very few medical persons promote primal birth traditions of natural birth.  Why not?  It is not political.  That means no higher profits to anyone. And politics are involved in the active management policies, for the higher the incomes and profits of corporations, they get the spin-off, too. So political profits over well-being are the objectives and true standards of the professional groups, least risk of harm and best practice possible for the benefit of the medical consumer.  It may be a matter of repeat business. And, internally damaged persons, give repeat business, not well persons, eh?

______________________


LITTLE COST TO SOCIETY FOR NATURAL BIRTH EDUCATION AND PRACTICE:

    The facts are that natural births need not cost a dime to the birthing mother or her family. All the cost might be, for the mother unsure of her body or to have a natural birth experience, is at the most, the cost of a rented room in the hospital.


    A door stop taken for the assurance the birth is hand's off, an unassisted birth.  By having a signed Birth Contract is a good assurance of privacy, even in a rented room in a hospital.


    Why some women go for active management.  Well, they are not educated is one reason.  And, the other is I think women let themselves be managed fearing taking their own responsibilities in birth and control of their decision-making powers.  This may because many women have not had decision making powers for long. So many are yet dominated and controlled women. Some have actually been on the internet, stating their husbands are ordering them to have a hospital birth, and the husbands are uneducated and do not know the risks of active managed births, of drugs, and gadgets and thing-a-ma-jigs.  There object is to have a living mother and a living child, not that their state of health will be well, thereafter, so it seems, in some cases.  And, in child birth, many women have lived to regret being controlled by men and women, and being forced into depressing care of their bodies and their babies.  

_________________________________________________________________________


WHEN NO TRUE INFORMED CONSENT IS GIVEN, CAN ACTIVE MANAGEMENT BE CALLED AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE PERSON (S):

    That harmful active management, imposed, with threats to the mother if she does not submit, is likely the real reason of postbirth trauma and depression. Some women have described their birth experience as though a rape, meaning no control to say "no" , or STOP. (See Rape of the 20th Century, by Leilah McCracken).


     I, too, describe my first child's birth, as type of rape. I had no control, no cell phone to call for help, to report abuse, and I was forced to accept hospital and medical policies imposed on my person. They said it was policy, I had to comply.  


    Well, I remember, crawling on the higher operating table, and almost falling over the other side, by being drugged.  Well, I remember the humiliating experience of being shaved, given an enema, the cutting of my body, an episiotomy.  There was no informed consent for any of this active management policies, imposed, and early clamping, without informed consent, to my child, born not crying, a drugged child. There was not forensic testing as to the drug evidence in the placenta, it was destroyed with no records of any testing of this valuable organ, and how it was discarded.


    The nurses were the agents of the doctor offering drugs, saying they would not harm me or the child. They lied because it has always been known, for a very long time, and seen, too, visually, that all drugs given during labor or the birth of the child, do cross the placenta, and can slow or speed up labor. And, because of the child's fetal circulation, the drugs go directly to the child's brain, with the most strength of the drug.


    Morphines are used to delay labor, it gives the doctor some 2 or 3 hours do be making income, elsewhere. Oxytocins (they have questionable preservatives in them, chlorobutanol, that can cause thyroid problems) are used to speed the labor up.  This is active management births. The births are manipulated to aid the doctor's business time schedule and the hospital's staff too. That is one example of manipulation of a the child's birth, that should be before the courts, I believe, as assault and an offense against the person, for none of these policies, under active management, were allowed by true informed consent.

_____________________________


VALUE OF COLLECTED STEM CELLS, MAY BE $30,000, FOR AN OUNCE OR TWO, PAID TO THE COLLECTOR OR PERSON SENDING THE CELLS TO A TRANSPLANTATION PROCEDURE:

    The early clamping of the cord allows for the child to be exploited of the placenta's trapped blood, deprived the child of interferon, and stem cells, worth, for example $30,000 per ounce, I've read. That kind of price for stem cells was paid by Australia before they began to harvest their own babies, too.


    Again, the only 'insane' motive I can see of the 9-1-1 medics and the BC Justice Institute following bogus policies is they are going along with the system to harvest babies, and for the value of the placenta blood used in research in tranplantation. The medics may be the agents or means to obtain the placenta trapped with the blood suspensions, and are doing this endangering, not known they are being manipulated into an endangering practice. They have means to take the trainers and authors of any books to a discipline committee of policies and ethics available in most medical institutions. They can resign their positions and go public, on principles violated of no harm done to any one person, or endangering to the person, the mother and/or the child, or both.


    To remain silent is going along with what many may believe is a corrupted medical system. The bogus teachings are infiltrated in almost every biology textbook, and in every course of lab technicians, and practical nurses, to doulas, to the nurses, and midwives, the family doctor and the surgeons. They too, have a duty to reject the bogus information of that author or that textbook publisher.


    The offense of directions to any one person, is observed in each community, where the issues must be dealt with, locally.   All of these medical groups and education authorities, have local means of correction, there are powers that be, not being used.  These are to the Universities and Colleges own power in their selection of materials and reference books, and to neglect this issue, may be perceived as contributing to the internal injury of the child, where the bogus practices is imposed on.

_________________________________


MALFEASANCE OF A PERCEIVED PROFESSIONAL DUTY OF TRUST OF NO HARM DONE OR NEEDLESS ENDANGERING OF RISK OF HARM:

    It is perceived that "all" involved at the professional duty of level (malfeasance of a perceived duty of trust in truthful information) must be named in any civil litigation. This is because these organized professional groups will not stop, unless an Court Order, bigger then the medical organization, makes them stop as to breach of trust to the publics' best interest to any one citizen. Only a Court can allow for this Order to be granted. When politics of profits are involved to any private institution, the honour system of self-governing, no harm done, are not often honoured until the issue is before the Civil or Criminal Courts of Justice.

________________________


EQUAL PROTECTION TO THE NEWBORN CITIZEN, THE NEONATE, AND SECURITY OF PERSON:

    Neonates are full class citizens and must be regarded with respect.  Respect is not harvesting babies. Due Process of Law is using a court, a judge, or Judge and Jury who will hear why the early umbilical cord clamping has gone on without dispute within the organized medical groups.  Is it a conspiracy for political corporation profits?  Some think so.  I think so.  And why has there been 9-1-1 counsellors advocating the endangering of the child by directing the use of things like a dirty shoe strings to do a unnecessary tying off of the umbilical cord.  And tying off a cord made to sound like a needed medical treatment. This teaching and following the bogus teaching, when the persons should be reasonably thinking persons, and are paid to be thinking persons, causes a direct threat of bodily harm (offense against a person) to the child, and even to the mother, too.


    Many parents have not sued, so far, for this unnecessary threat and violation to the mother and child. This is mostly, because they cannot believe what they have read.  They are in shock, what has been going on. They also think that by having a living child no harm was done, but the child was not respected or properly protected.


    Those parents with impaired children have often found law firms, equally in shock and claim they don't know what to do.  But, they ought to as officers of the justice system.  But, mostly, it may be because the parents have the care of a living baby, and this is why mothers and fathers have not sought the help of the Court.  It may be their baby will not reach his/her fullest potential in life (genius potential destroyed), or to expect a full quality life span. This is after a threat of virus entry and deprived volume of nutrients and oxygenated blood to the brain and central nervous system of the victimized child. Many think of the adults doing this offense, and have not long thought of the duty to the child, trusting in no breach of trust to his/her care by any adults, and mainly those in charge of the training of the medical persons, that they are ethical, competent and skilled on the infant's circulation system, and do nothing to hinder the blood flow or contaminate the blood.  


    It is a fact that any Next Friend of the child, knowing the situation of the violated child, ought to file a Writ. Sometimes, the Next Friend, is the State's own Social Agent of Children and Families.  They too, can intervene, if not directed this is a political financial benefit to allow bogus policies on endangering someone's child, eh.


    The filing of the Writ assures the rights of the child are shown due respect and guards the child's legal rights for equity and fairness in compensation for unnecessary risk taking of their person.


    Most cities are likely responsible for the work of their agents, that contract with them, the local fire department, and the ambulance medics that work with contracts of the hospital, and/or city, too. Hospitals have their medical malpractice insurance as do most honourable licensed medical persons.

_________________________________________


CLASS ACTIONS FOR CHILDREN KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN EARLY CORD CLAMPED OR THE CORD DIRECTED TO BE TIED OFF, WHEN IT WAS NOT TORN:

    If you know of any person with a damaged child, regardless of age,  even now being an adult, and you know they were clamped early on their lifeline, have them contact me. This is either in Canada or in the States, or any Nation.  When we have two or more persons with the same complaint, we can join forces for legal representation, even if that is our own representation before a hearing.  We will see if we can go after the authors, publishers, and heads of those teaching bogus policies that endanger any one child, too.


     Class Actions are any two individuals with a similar complaint.  


    The public and private cord blood banks are making a windfall on bogus teachings and policies set by the medical experts and their questionable policies. They have told the politicians, no harm to the babies early clamped.  They have lied those that said this.  They have concealed the truth of the amount of total blood volume created by the child by the size and gestation period of its birth, and how much blood they received, with or without parent's "informed" consent.  What parent would knowingly weaken their own offspring? But for a price, and because the child lives, some parents can be tempted to sell or donate their baby's blood to another.  But the duty is to the child and not violate duty of trust of best care to the child and to take no risks of anemic condition caused the child.


    The expert's professional societies, are accountable too, as far as I understand vicarious liabilities, even to non-profit organizations. It is not a free-for-all of any non-profit group that they can go around misguiding the public, as they are not making a profit.  They likely have incomes and assets.  

_________________________________________________


TV PROGRAMS AND FILMS PROMOTE ENDANGERING OF THE NEWBORN CHILD BY BOGUS MISREPRESENTATION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CHILD'S LIFELINE - THE UMBILICAL CORD:

    We have also to deal with the Hollywood films, that too, are promoting mischievous teachings of clamping the pulsating umbilical cord, then cutting it, then getting the baby breathing. Everyone holds their breathe, and wonders, "Will the baby breathe, and LIVE?"  That is criminal teaching as some children take one gasp of breath, and go limp.  (see the Chow-case-law , Ontario, Canada, by Roth and Sommers.


    The baby is seen surviving the assault, and living, but will be shy of enzymes, hormones, and full blood and volume capacity of blood and transfusion into the lungs. The TV programs, by private enterprise stations or government owned, such as the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC), should not be putting bogus teaching to the public at large, promoting stem cell collection from the newborn citizens.  CBC did show early clamping in the series, The Road to Avonlea.  They also showed early cord clamping in the show, Oliver Twist. These are the most current movies of showing endangering care to the newborn child. There are older films, advocating, earlier false teaching of the medical societies directing early clamping of the cord, known to be harmful to weaken the child, since Dr. Erasmus Darwin, who influenced his grandson, Charles, the champion of the Survival of the Fittest philosophy, said so in 1801.  The collaboration of a consistent bogus policy can be found in all areas of public education.  


    Neither publicly owned or private enterprise communication media should be misguiding the public.  Nor, should any public or school or university or college in their courses taught or in the purchase of textbooks on child birth, or in biology, promote bogus teachings. This is when the subject matter is not opinion but visual evidence of deprived blood from 20 to 50 percent deprived the child by early clamping, and drugs can be tested and found in the child's blood stream and in the tissues of the placenta. Status of those directing a bogus teaching should not be ruling in democratic societies today, should it or fear of a controlling cell medical group?   


     Wrong is wrong .  This is not opinion.  There is the "Visual Evidence" contained in the placenta, itself, the weight and the amount of blood drained is the visual evidence of what they deprived the owner/infant.  


    Surprisingly, this evidence of fact, by permission of most Administration of the local hospitals (check it out in your home town), destroy and/or do not record those facts of the child's placenta and the amount of blood trapped in it, or the timing of the clamping of the cord, or the condition of the cord, when clamped.  Why not?  


    To do so would bring an obvious review of each child's limitations after being weakened by unnecessary interruption of their circulation system. We do not want to compare our children, but when learning problems are apparent, the facts of the care and treatment at birth are often the strong indicators, of oxygen debt to the brain, and brain cells not developing continuously, as they ought to. What brain cells are there, merely get bigger (1)  as the child grows, but learning may be delayed by 3 and 4 years, and that is putting the child to employment disadvantages and choices of careers, in many instances.  It all depends on the means of the parents to help a compromised child, caused impaired by harmful medical policies imposed, the governments involved in knowledge of bogus medical practice they have not stopped by official inquiries, as a perceived duty from Federal, to each local community. (1) World Book, Vol. B, (Brain), p. 459, 1979).


    The medical persons don't call the following of bogus medical policies assault because most babies live, but if they have internal problems, they will say it is metabolic disorders caused by perceived bad genes. When parents assume bad genes they do not investigate the child's birth care or get to gather with other parents of children having similar problems. Such internal problems can be cancers and brain tumors of children, learning and behavior problems, (autism), MS, and CP.  MS is now found in children as young as 13 months old.


    That is the common excuse, never, investigating what the children, so violated with similar problems, autism, for one, all have in common, early cord clamping, infections caused by needles inserted into their bodies, soon at birth or during the birth, or needles inserted into the child's amniotic fluid, or being scanned, repeatedly, for not benefit to the child.  What can be done for a child scanned, but abort the child, and worry the mother to have more and more scans. The scanning must be used wisely, to not abuse the child unnecessarily. But many women are yet indoctrinated to trust the doctor and ask no questions, and some men, the fathers of the child, are so educated too, and do not study this issue to truly protect the mother of wiser options, and support her decision of home births, even unassisted, with just family near by to aid, as the mother requests help, if needed, or to birth unassisted in hospitals by a birth contract, for a hand's off birth, if all goes well.

___________________________________________


HOW MUCH BLOOD MIGHT A BABY HAVE, IN TOTAL:  IT SEEMS TO BE ONE OUNCE OVER THE BABY'S WEIGHT:

    The facts are a 9-pound baby makes 10 ounces of blood if full term. (World Book Encyclopedia, Vol, B (Blood) 1979).   That is 300 ml.  If you deprive the child of 60 ml or 180 ml, the average collection of an early clamped average sized child, you have taken 20 to 60 percent of total blood volume.  Only 20 percent deprivation of the child can put the child into shock. It may then die.  (See Chow-case-law references of medical facts).


    That is a crime, in any language and in any Nation.  The bogus authors and experts, can only be stopped by taking a civil and/or both a civil and criminal action.  The duty is also to those who had the contract to protect all equally. That is the College of Physicians and Surgeons of each Province, State, and Territory.  They have the contract to train ethically, morale and competently trained medical persons, and in some cases, that includes the midwives, too.  


    The State, Province, Territory have means to deal with those that did not do their duty in ethical and competent training. They can fire these boards by ending the contract of medical services, and appoint another governing body to oversee the training and ethics, and training of all medical persons to meet visual facts of proper care of the mother and the child's needs.

_______________________________________


LIABILITIES OF THE NATION IS TO THEIR OFFICIAL POWERS THAT BE REGARDING MALFEASANCE, BREACH OF DUTY AND OATHS:

     The State, Province, or Territory, are perceived to have the liability to uphold the Nation's laws and to see that the necessary criminal investigation on bogus policies is started, and making public announcements that regardless of age (moments old) the neonate will be respected and no longer harvested by bogus directives of those who were the experts, and had a duty to know better, for both women and men, or ought to have.  (Review Malfeasance which is a duty to do something and to fail to do that duty is in the criminal codes, it refers to a breach of duty or trust of duty and/or perceived obligation).


    If you have contacts as to the organizations that are not going public, of the visual fact there is no need to tie off or clamp the pulsating cord, please send me their written reply, why they have no best practice policy, least risk of harm. This is perceived as their duty to the child and birth mother.  I will share your right to file a Writ, as a concerned citizen of your area.  The duty, as I see it, is enforcement of the Nation's laws.  


    That is perceived to include enforcement of criminal codes, involving the police, too, who ought to be trained to know their duty that no organization, even of a medical organization, can get away with bogus life-threatening policies that danger any one child, not be even one drop of blood stopped by early clamping of a pulsating umbilical cord.

__________________________


     Even if the cord has stopped pulsating there is no need to clamp it, or tie it , ever, particularly, with a dirty shoe lace. The pioneers practiced primal birth, now called Lotus birth, and they had, too, babies that thrived. There was no navel hernias (weight on the cord), there were not blood infections (no cut cord), there were not anemic babies as the babies got their full supply of blood transfused from the placenta-lung-blood bag, into the babies expanding lungs.  Babies were respected, and should be respected in all nations and protected by truthful education to those planning a family and want healthy blue-ribbon-babies, unharmed by man or woman.


    These pioneer babies, (my parents, yet living, age 90, both unassisted births on the farms) were calm contented babies, having all their nutrients of blood inside their expanding lungs.  And not the blood taken by exploiting bogus policies, profiting governments and agents involved in medical experiments, research, transplantations, and cosmetic use of the placenta and placenta blood.  The known link of bad birth practices and bogus policies was revealed by Doris Haire, in 1997, see medications in child birth, which she also reveals bad birth positions and early clamping of the cord.  (Doris Haire, www.lotusbirth.com Table of Contents).


    There is evidence that doctors, as private business persons, objected to policies that stopped them making profits on doing circumcision procedures when there was no medical need to do so. Today, the medical insurance plan do not pay for trends or rituals of procedures that are not of medical need.


    I question that the public medical insurance plans include in their fees the clamping and cutting of the cord, not stating it is not a paid for need in the care of the child, unless for placenta previa or that the cord tore. If they are paying for organ collection and blood collection, they are indirectly paying for an endangering practice and policy.  


    Perhaps, because the doctors lost a source of income of amputation of the foreskin, they have sought a replacement of that income by selling the placenta organ and the placenta blood, which the blood, if a certain kind can be worth $30,000 an ounce.


    If the medical cell groups, adopt a bogus policies that allow for unnecessary clamping of the umbilical cord, why wouldn't a business man, a doctor, or the hospital, go for the profits.


    That is just being political and scamming the public by making a bogus policy that is used to pretend to fool the politicians, who are in the scams of grant moneys paid to private enterprises. Private universities and those in experimental research get the grant money for stem cells research.  All levels of private enterprise and the Federal governments to the community care of the mother and the child, have been using the placenta stem cell blood and use of the placenta organ.


    This one thought why medical cell groups organized and made several bogus policies and it may be why the rest of the membership allow this to go on, as they too get spin-off, when more internal damaged persons are caused at birth traumas.  It may explain why the ethics and policy committees have never disciplined those that created and allowed the bogus policies on this issue of early cord clamping.


     It would seem to stop this bogus medical cell group teaching and allowance of bogus policies, it will be on test cases of those parents with presently impaired and compromised children.  There is some attempting to seek legal action and they are being met with shock of the justice officials, they don't know what to do with visually evidence of a bogus medical policy.  More seem to be in empathy of the embarrassment to the professional cell groups organized in this scam, that lends itself for its irrational existence to plots of conspiracy, which are criminal in nature, where two or more persons, or levels of organizations, allow for bogus policies to be approved by their governing bodies.


    The common association to compromised children of what they is a factor in their illnesses is that early clamping, drugs, false birth positions, and injections into an anemic baby are present.  As evidence, of now deceased child, visit on the web site, the Yurko Project.  Here was an induced birth, by drugs, a premature child, early clamped, and injections given a compromised child, and likely many blood samples taken during the child care and treatment in the hospital.  


    In that case-law, under appeal of the sentence of life, plus ten, both parents were charged as to the assault on the child, but the mother excused, it is believed that diseased organs of the Yurko's diseased son (alleged shook), were best covered up if the father went to jail, rather than the system to admit they harvested a diseased baby for parts.


    In this case, the Coroner mixed up the race of the child, called the child black when his parents are Italian/Russian.  The Coroner failed to get all medical facts of a sick 5-week-premature child, who was injected at birth, and then injected with 6 vaccinations (some with mercury) all in one day, at 2-months of age.  The child died of heart failure two weeks later. It is known that mercury in any form can add to the size of molecules of the blood, and that may have caused the child's death.  But, the father was alleged he shook the child, which Alan Yurko has denied. The medical facts were not presented at the original trial.  No new trial has been set.  Alan Yurko has been in jail, over 6 years now. Had he plea-bargained, he would be a free man, today, had he said he shook his child, which, again, he denied he did that.


     One last thought:   If we don't protect the babies during their birth, why expect them to assist us in our old age, eh?  And in most instances, they wouldn't be able to assist us, as they, themselves, will never reach independence of their own life, or what is left of it.


Sincerely,

Donna Young

Natural Birth Education

Box 504

Dawson Creek, BC

V1G 4H4

TEL:  1-250-782-9223

    For references of research, please see this link:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm   Please pay particular attention to the Nurses' Manual. Nurses do know better or ought to.  They can complain by a registered letter to their professional group they step aside of any silence of bogus teaching currently going on, or failure to adequately educate the registered nurses on the facts of the fetus to neonate/adult circulation system.

_________________________________


Please visit this web link for a Petition to Protect Baby and the Mother, Too :   www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814


A medical web site that may answer your questions is at:   www.cordclamping.com


Table of Contents is at:   www.lotusbirth.com/_cont260.htm   (See Placenta, Fetus Circulation, Fetus Development, T. Peltonen, Mavis Gunther, Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration, and Ode to My Placenta.


References of studies with comments is at:   www.lotusbirth.com/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm


Home page:   www.lotusbirth.com

Originally Posted: May 29, 2004


Donations to help keep my research and sites going, are gratefully accepted . call Donna, BC Canada:  1-250-782-9223 if you wish to make a direct deposit to my account. It costs me in management, personally, on my pension means,  $231.00 a month to share my research that began in 1999. Or you can assist by allowing me to put up your own domain name and web site, for a reasonable monthly fee.  I can assist you in developing a web page.

____________________________________________________