Oxytocin is known to be harmful to the mother and the fetus, by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education

Oxytocin (link below in red) is known as: Syntocinon, Toesen, Pitocin). Oxytocin is a powerful harmful drug (a man-made-hormone) used in pregnancy. It is alleged a miracle drug to quicken the child's birth and is alleged that it may prevent bleeding. Oxytocin just may cause harsher contractions causing the tearing of the placenta from the womb. This can cause the mother to have a serious operation to repair. The mother may be then at risk to have no further children, or may never carry them full term, or to be born naturally, thereafter. Active management opinions and practices are standard practices by most institutional and licensed medial persons who may be following blindly directives to "only" offer active management (AM). AM is mostly controlled in most private and government birth centers that avoid primal birth rights to a mother's informed choice for an undisturbed birth right.  This Url's Reference is:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-631.htm  April 7th, 2004

This link below shares concerns about mothers being offered Oxytocin, in any form, tablet, IV's, injection, or in powders on food.  (See also Ringer's Solution at the Merck Manual on the internet).

AIMS.org.uk

http://www.aims.org.uk/jnlsum98d.htm

Mallard, Ec, et al, Transient umbilical cord occlusion causes hippocampal damage in the fetal sheep, Am J Ob Gyn, 1992, 167(5): 1423-30.

Thornton, JG, Lilford, RJ, Active management of labour: current knowledge and research issues, BMJ, 1994; 309:

Thorp, JA et al, Effects of high dose oxytocin augmentation on umbilical cord blood gas values in primigravid women, Am J Ob Gyn, 1988; 159: 670-5.

OTHER CONCERNS:

This active management and the use of oxytocin can be very dangerous to the uneducated mother, according to the World Health Organization:   

Check out the below link of a drug company and a manufacturer of the umbilical cord clamping and cutting tool, Umbicut. Dupont's information does not warn about 20 to 50 percent total blood loss to an immediately clamped child. Dupont only tells of the benefits of protection to the cord amputator. Dupont has provided a blood-splattering shield to protect those that will be endangering the baby to be caused to be anemic. This is low blood volume by deprived blood 1/2 cup to 1 cup that may take the child over six months to recreate.

The baby is being risked to being robbed of quality of life, or life itself: Dupont, following the World Health Organization's directions to clamp a baby's lifeline, after the mother is given oxytocin, withholds information that the baby's created own placenta nutrients will not then be rightfully transfused into the baby's expanding lungs. The choice is between toxic blood or an anemic baby (blood deprived). That's a choice?? Why not a healthy baby of a primal birth and say, "No,"  to active managed birth methods.   Why not "Go a Natural Birth" if you want a healthy end to your pregnancy?  Primal Birth Traditions is your natural woman's right.    Is that not what this is all about -- to have a healthy baby, not just a living harvested baby, one that has been breached his/her trust and exploited by the system and the community's obligation of duty to the child and the trusting mothers?    http://www.umbicut.com/supporting_data.html

CURRENT TRENDS OF TRAINING OF THE MEDICAL GRADUATES TODAY:

The active management policies are what is taught, in most instances, to the currently trained medical persons and their institutions. Some past competently trained doctors have switched, for political reasons, and have become involved in the profits in the selling harvested placenta blood. The communities are unsafe, at present, because of those professionals not opposing the bogus teachings and practices that endanger any one child in the community; while yet, the violated children live, in most instances.

Those infants that do die, of shock, are not treated with respect of enforcement of the laws for an investigation of a wrongful death.  There is going on concealment of the facts having, apparently, the cooperation of the Coroner's who are not investigating if the placenta had more blood in it, then did the child. Perhaps, they are just ignorant of what is going on. This is because many of the community Coroners are not really medical doctors and may just take orders to leave things alone, as to the harvesting of the baby's organs and the placenta blood being deprived the child.

These bogus trained medical persons, male and females live in your communities. These medical persons, including ambulance medics, will not share in their communities what they have been doing. They have concealed and covered this up alleging more research must be done. This when they ignore the visual evidence of fact of the amount of blood trapped in the placenta and who did abscond with it and with no record where it went or who billed for the collection of the organ and the blood in it. This taking of the placenta and blood may include the profits paid to the community hospital and its current policies to have sold the placenta and the placenta blood for no parental true informed consent or choice to allow their own baby to have had full blood transfusion into their expanding lungs.  Those on the local hospital committees kept this a secret, in most instances. Some may call that a conspiracy of silence.

If their medical practice and policies are so good and noble and do no harm to the child, why can't each doctor and nurse in the delivery rooms speak of this intent publicly?  Why not?  They revive weaker babies, and some babies are damaged seriously for failure to give the baby needed additional blood after early cord clamping. See Chow-case-law.  The baby's deprived blood would be sold as prime value to the hospital, and cheaper and artificial blood was given the child, and/or whole blood with the risk of disease to the child, such as Hep A, B, C, etc...becoming evident 20 years later.   

VIDEOS AND FILMS LACKING ON GOOD FAITH OF IMMEDIATE CORD CLAMPING, FOLLOWED BY DRAINING OUT THE PLACENTA:

Where are their medical person's videos to show good faith to any judge revealing the amount of blood they drained from the placenta after an early umbilical cord clamped baby?  The no clamped babies and no cut cords, of the lotus birth choice, can provide good faith films and show strong healthy babies. Lets match the evidence of fact, whose babies are healthier and stronger, the early clamped and vaccinated babies, or the primal birthed (natural) cared for babies.

In the USA, they are foolishly spending $20 billion dollars on high risk active management policies. The money ought to be set aside to pay the past victims of actively managed and damaged babies, and the budget maintained, until they die.  The future must provide for healthy babies to be born for the prevention of internal sickness. Prevention is worth more then a pound of cure.  

No doctor wants to show a revived baby that was early clamped following a bogus policies, that leads to harvesting of the baby's deprived blood.  Is that good faith?  And, generally, speaking, actively managed babies have in common yellow-green, jaundiced skin and/or yellow-green whites of the eyes. It is so common they call this healthy and normal.  Primal Birth, or Lotus Birthed babies have healthy skin and are strong and are alert babies, they are blue ribbon babies. The no clamped babies and no drugged babies, pink up naturally. All babies are born bluish because of the fetal circulation system that changes into (and must not be rushed) the adult's circulation system, using the baby's lungs do now do the oxygen and carbon dioxide exchanges. The lungs need the placenta blood, that is just common sense.

There is no 1/2 cup to 1 cup of blood to be considered surplus blood to be wasted or to be taken by the State, Province, or Territory, to be used for science research. Nor, should this blood, important to the baby's well being, currently, to be then deprived for the blood to be stored for a rainy day of the baby's future needs.  He/she may go into shock with just 20 percent deprivation of their placenta blood and nutrients.  It is unnatural, even if the baby survives the endangering. This may be regarded by some as  (assault) (battery) and even (attempted murder). These are covered in the Federal criminal codes of each Nation and our duties to enforce the laws equally in all communities, regardless of the organization involving government officials and professional persons and their associations.

Most biology textbooks, on this issue, are wrongfully directing the clamping the infant's cords, immediately at birth. The information is knowingly, by visual evidence,  bogus teaching on the human baby's circulating system.  The duty is in each community to direct the corrections of the false teachings in all tax paid textbooks.  

Why should any parent allow a medical stranger to determine their baby's future health...by robbing it of up to 50 percent of placenta blood? And, by also concealing that fact they did so. Your family doctor is a business person, why would he share of his/her extra billings in collecting an organ that did not have to be detached, nor turned over to the state for disposal.  These business persons have hope that the placenta-blood may fetch them, personally, or the hospital they work in, some $30,000 per ounce of blood, for experimental transplants of stem cells.   In most instances, these medical persons, including your trusted doctor, male or female, have obstructed justice by also destroying the evidence of what they did with your baby's placenta and how much blood they obtained from the placenta.  They have used their own policies as a license to do as they please.  For example the Web site, MDConsult, uses Dr. Gabbes opinion, a doctor could himself/herself determine by their own convenience when to clamp the cord. The convenience of the doctor is not necessarily to the benefit of the child or the child's best interest. This opinion of Dr. Gabbes also stated the blood trapped in the placenta was not important "to them" to record that fact of the amount of blood deprived "your" baby. Of course, Dr. Gabbes added, "in most instances" it was not important.  Meaning what???? !!!!

In this concealing of the evidence, they were likely backed by hospital ethics committee not to have informed choice on this issue or what was done with your baby's blood and placenta organ.  The intent was to conceal that too, in each community. This is a community problem. The false teachings must be dealt with by the school district's policies to correct the false information by biology authors and their publishers.  They can direct past books have information crossed off or the publishers replace those pages and the cost to past the correct information in current textbooks, K-12 and at the colleges, and reprints of resource information, too.  

Court Orders or Writs of Mandamus for a government agencies to do something is an optional choice of any citizen in the community to have this fixed up per city, per school, per college, and per university. They may even go as far to request a hearing to see of the policy makers should be charged for making the birth centers unsafe in each community by bogus policies set by Experts. For example, Policy #89 May 2000, set by The Society of Obstetricians and Gyncologists of Canada, who directed immediate cord clamping on all Canadian babies.  One might ask a Court for the fining of all medical associations, and including the duty of the and Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons.  They had a duty to protect the public from bogus policies.  In Canada, we did not have ONE Canadian doctor or ONE nurse or midwife object to that bogus policies, another one being SOGC's Policy #71, December 1998.

The medical associations, including the nurses and the midwives, by not going public with this issue, and addressing it in each community newspaper, I believe, got along and kept jobs and careers by silence. They must have thought, "What was in it for them?"  Well, likely a bonus in collector's fees, or selling a special type and race blood to stem cell transplant experiments. Stem Cell blood collection may pay $30,000 for an adult size collection of the baby's deprived placenta stem cell blood. Some premature baby's blood is harvested every 2nd and 3rd day, to add to that blood type. They knowingly take 10 to 15 percent total blood volume.  See References this web site.  For such a price, even the natural parents may be tempted to harvest their baby's blood for such a fee.

The names of those who have collected the blood can be found registered at each stem cell blood bank around the world. Over 2000 medical persons in the States alone, midwives, included, and obstetricians are in this harvesting of the babies, at birth by early cord clamping, and all levels of government, starting in each community. Each Provincial or State elected official, each Ombudsman, each radio and TV Station, each local school as to contents in their biology textbooks. The persons know who are on these committees for selection of textbooks used, the course content and subject matter. They know who they are and the upper levels of government that allowed the picking on and harvesting of our babies, world wide.

The duty is to deal in each community to clean up the bogus teaching and policies, and to have an Official Commissioned Inquiry, such as what was done for the Canadian Krever Report. This Krever Report was on the threat of Canadian Blood supply's quality. The Krever report was used to bring the necessary discipline of criminal charges to some high officials, doctors and associations, both in Canada and the United States, who had allowed the lack of confidence of trust in the medical system to be fair to all consumers. They have been charged under Section #180, of Common Nuisance and under causing bodily harm to any one individual.

This harvesting of babies, cannot be set aside simply by age, or mental or physical disadvantage that it is a baby's rights deprived of equal security of person and equal protection or enforcement of the criminal codes and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada, and the Human Rights Declarations of all Nations. We had a duty as adults to give to the child the best we can offer.  They deserved better in the community hospitals and by our community medical persons, male and female, from the ambulance medic to the surgeon.

The facts are no need of interruption of the infant's umbilical cord, ever, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa.   They were directing a bogus policy to do merely a pH test.  The American Policy of that bogus reason for immediate clamping on all American babies was cancelled January 2002. That was their bogus Educational Bulletin, #216, November 1995, and some previous policies of the same nature.

These experts knew or ought to have known pH tests can be done by urine samples, and the same for genetic testing, only consented to by informed consent, of PKU tests.  The truth is a fine needle , with risk of inserting a virus, may be inserted into the pulsating umbilical cord vein. Testing of the umbilical cord vein blood did not factually need hasty clamping, at all, ever.    See Also Fetal Circulation and Neonates circulation, at this web site, www.lotusbirth.com

Most of these community institutions are involved, directly or indirectly, the undermining the mother's natural rights of freedom of "informed" choice. The community, directly or indirectly, are discriminating in a form to women who are pregnant.  They are directly or indirectly, not offering the right for all women to have a signed birth contracts what cannot be done to her body or to her baby. These medical organizations are seeking, directly or indirectly, collective and severely as an organized group, to control and govern over another's persons right of informed choices, based in visual truths of science, not opinions of controlled bogus clinical studies, that support a drug or procedure of higher costs in child birth care and practices.

Many of these clinical studies, published in medical journals, have gone unchallenged of what are consider appropriate care they intend to impose on uneducated pregnant mothers. If we went to the controlled randomized trials, would we find a witness to speak to what they actually consented to, in a controlled study, and what these birthing mothers were "not" told or informed about?  Many of these randomized trials are bogus, promoting one drug over another. The women did not have informed choice to be in a group of monitored choice for Primal birth, warm water births,and no clamping or cutting of the cord ever, and undrugged births.  These are what are missing in controlled randomized studies.  

SELF-REGULATING GROUPS ARE TO HAVE TRUST OF THE COMMUNITY OF NO HARM DONE.  SUCH TRUST MEANS THE COMMUNITY IS TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ALLOWING ANY  BOGUS POLICIES WHICH COULD BE CHALLENGED BY VISUAL EVIDENCE OF HARM TO THE MOTHER OR CHILD, BUT ARE BEING CONCEALED  OF SUCH  FACTS  OR THE CONVICTING EVIDENCE DESTROYED, OR NOT RECORDED BY THE DOCTOR AND/OR THE NURSE:

 A self-governing group, by their own declared policies, were making those organized policies, by a controlling group, an assumed law but in violation to the Nation's laws and duty to the individual's informed choice of what is not done to their person.   Many of the medical policies and directives in medical manuals were, directly or indirectly, attempting for a professional control group to attempt to undermine the individual's constitutional right to informed choice.  Each persons must have the right to be self-directive of what is or not done to one's own person or to their child.

It is the parent's control of the child what is or not done....providing the parent is being governed by no harm done to the child, or unnecessary risk taking, respecting the child's right, too, to security of person.  Therefore, not even the parent, can give an opinion they are sacrificing this child's blood to be taken by early clamping, and sent to another's cause.  This is causing this child a criminal violation and an offense to the person, and causing this child to be a second-class citizen. How?  They are causing by unnecessary early clamping to intend to rob this baby's whole placenta blood to be stopped. The blood then drained from the placenta and given to another. This is either by donation or by a private concealed profits of selling the placenta or contents of the placenta.

SOURCE DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR DISCOVERY BY FILING THE APPROPRIATE START OF AN ACTION -- A WRIT:

Tracing such exchange of funds may be hard to prove without an audit of the family's income, if they are selling their baby's blood to others, for profit. The same can be audit to all income and expenses to private and public institutions, that have been, in the past years, also taking the placenta blood and using it, and selling the placenta to organ tissue banks, and cosmetic and drug companies and to research. Much of the research was privately funded and other research was paid for by government grants, involving the State, Provincial or Territorial governments to the Federal level of the public purse. They had a duty not to allow an offense against the person, even by not depriving the child of one drop of blood. Not one drop of blood deprived the child by early clamping, was a duty of all to the child.

Records must be kept of expenses and incomes received and extra billings done by doctors and their staff and private labs. This taking the baby's placenta and placenta blood has been a secret scam for many years now. Actually, the bogus policies may actually have intent to knowingly harm the child, to weaken it by sex, race, color, mental or physical disadvantages, or social class of the parent(s) were known since 1801.  See Erasmus Darwin, Table of Contents.

Those responsible for the conspiracy of silence, organized to profit to use the child's placenta blood, need to have their day in court. Generally, it is the love and duty of the parents, that directs which court, criminal or civil, to bring to the authorities attention their child was taken advantage of, and wrongfully so, as an offense against a person.

A civil action financially compensates the child for threat (assault) an offense against the person. Criminal disciplines for the disrespect as a criminal endangering to the child, not necessary.  Only if the cord tore or for placenta previa was there a true need to clamp a cord, to be followed with immediate correction of oxygen and blood volume restored.  (SEE the Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law, Ontario, Canada, Sommers and Roth).

These suits resolved were $8 and $14 million for any "one" unnecessary medical err of judgement or omission that happened to these babies, in birth, active management births, that caused them to be compromised, blind, mute, (deaf) paralyzed.  Any child even threaten to be so risked to that danger, has a right to a civil suit filed and a criminal hearing for the threat even if the child was minimally damaged, subtle...not as serous as these two children were damaged by stopping the circulation flow of blood and volume to their brain.  

It is any informed person's call, in the community, to defend those who cannot protect themselves in the community from unnecessary medical violations going on in the training of those in the community, who will some day, if not there, somewhere else, be doing active management. This drugging and hasty clamping of the child's lifeline, has all community levels involved.  Many professional persons in the community have simply not done their duty and protected any one child in that community, as they could have or ought to have, by implied duty of care and proper truthful education made available in all communities, equal for all to have, not just an inside group or selective group in the society.

SELF-GOVERNING AND RULING PROFESSIONAL GROUPS ARE GOVERNED BY THE NATION'S LAWS - DO NO HARM:

These self-governing policies, believed in collusion, consists of many levels of government who are dealing with professional training and resource materials.  Many have organized to void out, in many instances, standards of ethics and the reasons of licensing of professionals, first, to protect the public.  It is perceived they did not honour that duty and did apparently organize, to conceal potential harm in controlled policies directing teaching and practice to be imposed on the uneducated and trusting public. The duty was no one in the community would be shown disrespect and all equally protected and all given security of person.  Simply, no harm to any one person in the community should be permitted by the conspiracy of policies of any one group taking advantaged of those disadvantaged to not know the other's intent or concealment of that intent.

The medical policies and clinical studies, therefore, cannot be bogus, false, alibis to avoid accountability and responsibility.  What some of these policies were doing was offering opinion but not true visual evidence of fact finding, or evidence of facts of harm but all information told, not edited out or selectively controlled what was left out of clinical studies of randomized trials.  On the internet many of the randomized trials can be read to note what is generally missing:  the stated health of the mother and the drugs given her during labor, and the timing of the clamping of the cord, and if the placenta was out first before any clamping, and if all pulsating had ceased, and when that happened. The evidence of recordings, in hospital research is 20 minutes for drugged babies.  

The false information, in all tax paid for education resource materials, in each community, must be immediately corrected, on this issue. In particular all biology textbooks that are directing early umbilical cord clamping on the human baby and concealing the threat to the child of many of the state-of-the-art technology that can be harmful to the embryo or the fetus or the baby being born.  Those policies directing the harvesting of any one drop of blood from the newborn citizen, must be challenged and the group showing disrespect to the newborn child.  The duty is on each adult in the community, at large.  

BREACH OF TRUST TO ANY ONE PERSON IN THE COMMUNITY:

Most women, of the past 3 and 4 generations were trusting and naive to believe in the best practice possible, in medical care.  They were believing when the went into the community hospital there would be no unnecessary risk taking and no harm done. They believed that would be the rule, not the exception.  Most women, in child birth, went to a professional person to do no possible harm to the mother, or the baby or babies. Most parents believed that if they asked a question the duty of the professional person was to find the correct answer based in truth and not shielded in a lie of intent to deceive by the concealed intent to harvest their baby or increase the cost of maternity services, unnecessarily, and to raise a greater burden to the community in health care.  Or, to raise the costs in another professional group, in the rising costs in education to an impaired child, who was, if the records are sought, in all probabilities was damaged, needlessly, by active management policies of drugs and hasty umbilical cord clamping to any one child in the community.

The active management, I perceive, is the enemy of all good intentions of medical policies.  This is because active management (AM) seeks to control the birth by time efficiency and personal profits to doctors and higher profits billed, also by the institutions they work in. The AM seeks, in some instances, to create a higher expense for profits by billed services, paid by the medical insurance companies, that may be a part of paying for endangering policies, that are not safe, and have seen an increase in autistic children.  The facts are autism is alleged to be a giant increase of bad genes, that since the 1970's, autistic children were 1 in 30,000 babies, and today, the evidence of research is one in 110, is labelled autistic.  These victimized children, if the birth records are reviews, will be found to have had drugs during labor and early cord clamped babies, and injected with stuff at birth, and the baby anemic at the time of injection, that is low blood volumed. The injection of mercury in the vaccination takes 120 days (4 months) to be eliminated from any one cell. The child is continually injected with stuff, every 2 months up to 6 months of age.  This means the mercury in the vaccinations is never allowed to be eliminated before another injection is taking place.

Many of the medical services are charged to the medical plans, and ultimately to the tax payers. Many of the services, during the birth of the child, were not found recorded in the child's own medical charts. Either this suggests fraud, the services billed for were never done, or that the results of tests indicated endangering of the services given the child, and the evidence was being destroyed, knowingly.  Only a Writ filed in the child's name or the mother's name, will begin fact finding by the Court's allowance to find out the facts, per child or mother's birth, in the community hospital.

NATURAL BIRTH IS SAFER:

Active management, in 93 to 95 percent of healthy births in healthy women, are NOT necessary, over the right of choice for a natural primal birth of no hands on birth, the birth not even witnessed by a medical person.  The actual cost of a primal birth, even if done in an institution, should cost no more then a rented hospital room. This rented hospital room is just to add any security of protection for the 3 to 5 percent of all births that may have true need of a professional's help. It is nice to have this security blanket for true need of necessary interventions, but not before a need.

The mother birthing in any institution, birth being natural and not a sickness, has the right to have equal protection for privacy by using a door stop behind the door. She may want to put a sign, saying Keep Out.  Do not disturb.  A Traditional Primal Birth (Natural Birth) is in Progress, in a Warm Water Tub. The mother is catching her own baby. The mother has her own chosen birth witness who will call for help, if the mother directs help is requested. The Birth Contract and Waiver is posted on this door.  

The facts of active management is the policies use drugs in manipulating the birth.  The morphines to slow the labor. Then the oxytocins, or a variation of this man-made drug, that will work in the same method of terminating the pregnancy, by speeding up the labor.  These two drugs can follow an IV of a Ringer's Solution that was alleged to stop dehydration. These drugs can be added secretly and against a mother's wishes for a narcotic free birth.  (See Are Medical Services Safe).

Many questionable state-of-the-art practices can be used by the active management policies to cause what they call a safe, fast, and painless birth. Those statements, of course, are lies, and bogus.  The active management policies are guided, in many instances by drug companies and greed of higher profits. They are not geared to prevention of internal damages to the mother or the child.  See The Merck Manual, for example of one such influence on the training of doctors to use drugs and tools and command control of a woman's birth. Never, once, have I seen this Merck Manual, past and present editions, directing the rights of the women of informed choice or a signed birth contract of what cannot be done to her body or to her baby. Why Not?  

ARBITRATION CAN BE USED BY ALL -- THE COURTS:

There are courts to resolve such matters if either party, knowingly or not, can harm a child, not just physically, but internally by the management of the child's care during labor and after birth.  It is fair for the mother to get all care and treatment records from those involved in the child's birth, and all their training and manuals, and approach the Court, to tell a Judge the intent of the local community of medical care providers intend to impose a policy of Active Management and harmful injections after the birth to her baby, and that active management and other policies of a political nature, threatens her person and her baby's well being. That natural care does not threaten the child, as severally as the intended care which she fears will be imposed on her, as a prisoner without rights of protection.

She may tell the Judge, the intent of active management was also involves the intent of  withholding information the nature of the appropriate care. Or her right to refuse that care.  That this appropriate care (like in a forced signed form) intended no informed choice for her to be a self-determining mother. And, this is when medical persons do know that  having babies is not a sickness or a disease  for the mother for a medical group to take control so she cannot decide how, where, and with whom, is best to be with her until her child is born. She may tell the Judge, that she is protecting her baby to no harm risked or done by wanting a Signed Birth Plan of what cannot be done to her body or to her baby.

This is the perceived duty of all adults, and including the fathers-to-be, too. No person, not even a Judge, can order a mother's body be cut, to deliver her baby.  The consequences may be fate...and it is the mother's call, not society's. (SEE C-section cannot be forced by the Court, London, UK)

APPROPRIATE CARE IS NOT INFORMED CONSENT TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT POLICIES IMPOSED:

The mother has not made a true informed consent if she does accept active management. Regrettably, the mother by trial of error and experience, then finds herself and the baby harmed.  She finds no accountability to the system's active management that the experts alleged was offered in good faith. Good faith does not destroy evidence as is the case of destroying the evidence of the placenta and the contents of the amount of blood trapped in the placenta by early cord clamping. What they recorded failed to record all facts of care and timing of the cord, weight of the placenta, and amount of blood drained, and by whom, and where it went, and why, and how.

Active management is time efficient and the use of harmful drugs.  NO drug is safe to give a pregnant women at any time of her gestation period. If the professional person is fair to her, all information of the manufacturer's warnings or approval of purpose of the drug and warning to a pregnant women would be told her. This is because all drugs, gases, injections, creams and gels, will cross the placenta.

ACTIVE MANAGEMENT IS DISHONEST...IT DESTROYS OR FAILS TO KEEP FACTS OF RECORDS AND CARE AND TREATMENT:

I have found that active management apparently works with institutional policies to obstruct justice by destroying the placenta. The parents were not allowed to take it for opinions and tests to check for fact that the injections and drugs given the mother were present in the placenta cells, after active management.

Doctors were trying to keep the placenta, with concealed intent they were profiting by offering organs for profits. The hidden intent to get the placenta, or cosmetically remove it from the baby was their trying to influence a bogus policy by saying the organ was dirty and would spread disease.

Parents can be directed to put the placenta in an environmental bag, for storage in their freezer, or burial in their own property, if they approve when it may be clamped, if clamped and removed from the baby, at all.  Removal of the placenta is not a medical need, and doctors and other medical professionals have concealed the use of the placenta in organ use and tissue and membrane use.  This has been a violation of trust of many generations now, in Western Societies and the same with the use of the foreskin of circumcised babies. It boils down to breach of trust.

The parents can decide if they want a cosmetic removal of the placenta in the hospital or do this hours, later, in their own home, protecting no syringing out of the baby's placenta by those who would deceive and take the baby's placenta hormones. Of course, this involves the nurses and lab technicians. They are part of the problem if not part of the solution. They have professional organization that protect them to have informed consent of tissues they are removing without true informed consent, they are using the baby's blood and tissues in science projects.  This is deception and breach of trust if those involved remove the baby from a guardian's witness and observation, even for a moment. No one has to trust a medical system not to harvest any person's organ in institutional care.

The accounting billings are records of fact of the care and treatment to the mother and child. Those Billings are the legal rights of the legal guardian of the child to find out just what was billed for for $20,000 in a vaginal birthed baby, for example in the USA.  The start of an Action, the Writ allows the court to become a fact finder, all who were involved of breach of trust to the mother or the child, regarding institutional care in child birth...when primal birth requires no touching of the mother or the child, in 93 to 95 percent of all births.  

UNNECESSARY INCREASED COSTS TO THE TUNE OF $20 BILLION DOLLARS IN THE U.S.A. MARKET OF BABY CARE

The more drugs and machines used in a mechanical manipulated and controlled birth, active management, means unncessary increases in the costs to the maternity care costs. The higher costs to society did not necessarily produce healthy babies as the end product.  Nor, were the healthy mothers entering the hospital, leaving the hospital with the same good health. They were not damaged, some never ever to have good health or the hopes of longevity again.   

Active management, can in most instances, merely produce a living baby, and allow for a living mother to leave the hospital. Again, they leave not as intact as nature intended them to be, by natural birth.  Active management has taken away the child's natural birth right to be a blue ribbon baby, truly born equal...with all the gifts and talents God, the Grand Omni Designer, provided for that child. Of course, that is provisional that the two parents did their duty to conceive a child in a healthy body, drug free, and pollution free as the best that they could provide, in the community where the child was conceived and possibly born.

BLIND TRUSTS PAYS THE PIPER:

The trusting and uneducated mothers pay a terrible, terrible price for not being educated on the facts of the harm of active management. They did not, by error of the community, have, in most instances, the choice to have a healthy primal birth. This means, to birth in any institution by a no hands on births.

Birth in hospitals should be no different of what was true for most pioneers prior to the 1920's.  Most babies, at that time, were born 93 to 95 percent of all births, in undrugged, freedom of position and unassisted births in the homes. Natural birth cost little, and it was not political to cause births to be a thriving profitable business, now called active management.  The babies, themselves, controlled the time they came. The mother cooperated, naturally, with the baby's time schedule.  This was not a medical institution's decision.

EDUCATED WOMEN DO NOT GET IN A PANIC AT THE BIRTH TIME - THEY KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEIR BODY, AND WHY:

Wise women did not go temporarily insane to rush their baby's birth by being told a number of days or weeks is when to expect their baby. This time date, is a guess, and must be told the mother, it is not set factually.  Deliveries should not be planned for celebrations, or convenience of medical persons, the mothers should be educated in how to have an emergency birth, in their own homes, as the first lesson after discovery, they are expecting.  

The mothers-to-be must be fairly told that due dates are only a suggested date, and not a mandatory goal setting. The baby then may become a target for being actively managed  scheduled in a hospital.  This date setting can lead to "stuff" offered to be applied to the mother's cervic or membranes. This becomes an upsetting debate between the mother and the care person, taking control of what is or not done to her person.  All facts are such matters are all billed for in the care of the mother and most persons suggesting "stuff" be taken are not accepting the reasonability of an allergic reaction to the mother and the child.  They are saying they had a policy or training to offer the junk, but they did not offer all information of the dangers, associated or the right to know an allergic reactions, means no safe level.  Some mothers were being threatened if they did not subject themselves to a scan or gels and creams the doctor was going to call in the agents of the community, and pick the child up, even if born safely, because the mother refused to submit to suggestions of unnatural interventions.  Many mothers have been on the internet stating the pressure of power playing of both male and female doing professional births are demanding the mother submit to scans, and insertions of needles to take samples from the baby's amniotic fluids.  The babies aborting soon after. Where creams and gels have been applied, some mothers had their cervix turned to mush.  Civil suits are not to the doctor personally, the community pays indirectly for the suits filed for medical malpractice and unnecessary interventions that make mothers and babies sick.

 The woman did not know to file a complaint of threat of assault on her person as to the doctor failing to inform the right of rejection of the threat to her person the scans could be harmful to the child's delicate tissues and cells, and the gels and creams a toxic poison to the child's blood stream. Many were threatening the mother to induction if she was advancing past their suggested due date. Motives can be the medical persons want their fee sooner, as they may have other plans after that date.  The doctors were being negligent not to tell the mother her rights to know that it may be natural for some mothers to go two and one-half weeks, past a suggested due date. Some doctors were forcing blood pressure pills and aspirin on mothers, if their blood volume went up. They were failing to tell her that an increase of blood volume is likely nature's way to provide extra blood for oxygen for the pending delivery of her baby, and the baby, too, logically, is increasing his/her 'red' blood cells for more oxygen, in preparation of the journey of birth. The increase blood cells will decrease in two or three days, naturally.

MOTHER'S HAVE INTUITION - THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE A DECISION OF CARE AND TREATMENT, AS TO THEIR BODY, THEIR BABY:

The mother's own intuition is her right to use to be her guide, and to know if something is going wrong. Mother's will know.  In most cases, there is no harm done to wait for the baby's arrival.  In some cases, the mother, by her gut-feeling and choice, may want one scan nearing the end of the pregnancy, if she is really concerned, of any changes, she thinks may be abnormal.   But if she is healthy and the baby is fine...she need not panic to be actively managed by another's guess of what is or is not going on inside her body..or the child's needs.  And she should tell others to not have anxiety as to her due date.  Simply tell them her baby is not finished adjusting for the need to exit the cozy birth space.  This can ease their anxiety , and the mother, if in good health goes along with her baby's time schedule. This is going to be unique to all baby's own needs.  Some babies need time to fatten up and grow more.  These babies will know when they are ready or not.  All women have a right to trust more in nature and not in another's guess. Again, no standard of care can guide all babies...they are unique, individuals, not set to standards of care, one clinical study fits all as a policy imposed on all...or a law to impose in institutional births. Challenge the studies. Challenge randomized trials.  Challenge what is left out of policies of duty of informed choice. Challenge is best done in a Court of Law.  

Oxytocin is an abortion drug . Few persons are licensed to use oxytocin for a pregnant women. Oxytocin terminates the pregnancy. Oxytocin, and its various forms of it, may be used to induce women.  Oxytocin is routinely given without true informed consent as to the harmful ingredients in it, like Chlorobutanol . The drug companies promote on their brochures, that Oxytocin may prevent bleeding. It may also be truthfully said, in may increase bleeding and infection of the womb by causing harsher and unnatural pulling away of the placenta, and prematurely, suffocating the baby.  Two then are risked being injured by the risk of using oxytocin.

The full risks of Oxytocin are not shared by most medical persons that it will endanger the mother and fetus. The risks are the heart contractions may not be regular, or thyroid problems may develop later. Such information is not told the mother long before the baby's due date. Many times Oxytocin is mixed with morphine. If the mother is on a Ringer's solution, to allegedly prevent dehydration, medical persons reported that Ringer's Solution was then switched to a morphine and oxytocin, when the mother requested a no narcotic birth right. (See Are Medical Services Safe, Globe and Mail. The mother may not be aware she was being drugged. Time management may be the reason, it is time for the mother to give birth, for the convenience of the staff, in most instances, who are manipulating the birth.  I also offer that the distress managed of the child can have political reasons of harvesting the baby's hormones released in the blood for higher harvesting profits.  

For example, if Interferon, known since the 1950's to fight infections and disease, is released from the cell of a distressed baby, it can be harvested for profits in the trapped blood in the placenta.  The baby's release of interferon, means the baby will have a low immunity system and will be compounded by the fact he/she is anemic at birth. This is my opinion of the concealment of active management that does early umbilical cord clamping without the cord being torn or for placenta previa and the variety of bogus reasons almost every medical person has thought up to avoid a criminal investigation of cause an offense of a threat of internal harm to a baby, and a risk factor to the mother, as well.  A full placenta that did not drain the placenta-lung-blood into the baby has a greater risk of rupture mixing two blood types inside the mother's body.  This threatens her future babies, and her own health, as well.  Natural birth allows the placenta to be born a "flat" cake, after all blood was transfused into the baby's expanding lungs.

The duty perceived was that all medical persons would logically know that. We do not interfere with the placenta and cord of any other mammal's, birth. Nor should we deny the human child equal security of person for full placenta-lung-blood-bag transfusion into his /her now expanding lungs, to do the same work that the placenta did, to do the gas exchanges of carbon dioxide and bringing in fresh air. The child will be on a dual system until his own system shuts down the arteries, and the vein continues to bring in the placenta blood until the placenta is what it will be a flat cake.  It is best not to clamp the umbilical cord, until after the completion of the child's birth, the placenta has been birthed in to a nice warm towel.

It may mean that parents are held accountable if they knowingly sought to harvest their baby of the nutrients of the placenta blood. But most parents were deceived by each community not educating by facts of visual evidence of a full placenta and a weakened baby, or research of the facts...doctors concealed intent to select whose child, and why, they clamped early. Was it a pattern by blood type, or blood in low supply at their hospital. Was it a policy to leave some blood in the placenta for the lab's use in training doctors and lab workers, or in research.  If so, the intent was secret and the baby's were harvested by breach of trust.  All babies would have had all their blood if they did not have a trained medical person managing the baby's birth, in the home or in the institution.  So perhaps, an announced unplanned emergency births in one's own home, may be the protection for mothers and babies, if video and signed birth contracts do not become the right in all community birth care facilities.

HORMONES, ENZYMES, STEM CELLS ARE SOUGHT AND PAID FOR, AT HIGH PRICES FOR EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH:

Other hormones and enzymes and stem cells (premature have more stem cells to be gathered then do full term babies) can be harvested by concealment of each community hospital that did not report bogus policies set by the experts directing immediate cord clamping of all babies, world wide.  

The duty is in each community that the professionals can be trusted.  So far, there has been breach of trust in each community.  The professionals had an implied duty and are perceived to be held accountable for not reporting false information that was allowed by some experts in that particular community.  Deal with the issue where you live.  You may use my attempt, in my own local town:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-625.htm   (This is a draft sent to the Council member on Health in our community.  It is also a Regional problem).

Dehydration is not a problem to most mothers birthing naturally.  The pregnant lady who is eating normally for strength in labor and having normal beverages of their choice do not normally get dehydrated, particularly, if they are not accepting drugs, knowingly.  And hopefully what would be naturally done in the home is not changed for time convenience in a controlled and manipulated threat to mother and child in an institutional birth. Or, by having a professional present, impatient to other incomes, yet, to be earned in the day. Drugs, can manipulate a child's birth, for political and economic benefits to the medical persons, or the institution.

Hopefully, the mother will persevere with pre-arranged patience not to be tired of her condition in the end. And, she will not risk harming herself by blind trust to be managed and/or manipulated by suggestions to end a pregnancy.  This is when it may be normal for her pregnancy, to perhaps go, even 42 weeks (10.5 months) and all is well.  It may also be normal for a child to come after five months, if the mother's system has become toxic (smoking, drinking, ecoli, prescription drugs, allergic reactions to something) for the baby to live, at all. But nature ought to decide, again, when the baby shall be born, not man's guess.  Motives can be to have a baby born prematurely because they have more stem cells then do full term babies.  The mother can be manipulated into an early deduction, not knowing the concealed motives are early clamping to harvest the baby's placenta stem cells.   Her baby can be targeted because of the child's particular race, or color, or mixed ethnic backgrounds.  Suggested prime blood sought for stem cell transplant experiments are Asian, Dutch-German, Indian-European, Russian, Italian and any race or group that was exposed to radiation fallout zones, since 1945 to the present day.  

DUTY OF EACH COMMUNITY TO SUPPORT THE MOTHER, NOT TO EXPLOIT HER BABY FOR HARVESTING OF PLACENTA BLOOD:

The mother ought to be supported NOT to be rushing her baby's birth with harmful castor oils, etc, or harmful exercises in her last days of the pregnancy. It is these last days, that are essential for the mother to have modest exercise and fresh air and eating natural good things like apples and celery, to avoid problems, and herbal teas, she is use to.  It is the end days that a mother may become over anxious by suggestions of others, "You are still pregnant?"  ...Like so what.  Suggesting the mother get the baby out and be done with it can be negative feed back to the mother, now tired, of her condition.  

The mother ought to be encouraged to use her own judgement, does she need a scan?  Technology, if used wisely and all risks known vibrations can stop cell development, may be necessary in some instances. Mothers should not be encouraged to use anything to cause the baby distress, such as drugs from the doctor or those purchased in stores, such as:   caffeine products, these substances can agitate the child, to cause a cord around the neck and prevent a normal delivery:   coke, Pepsi, teas, coffees, chocolates. These can and often do agitate the baby into higher activity. The distress may be winding the baby up in the umbilical cord, around the neck, even up to 5-times. Excess coffee drinking was the consequences of one mother who was anxious to get her baby out of her body...she did. But now in an unplanned c-section. A C-section is a major operation.  It is not a walk in the park and can lead to the flesh eating disease. The community needs to inform the mothers-to-be, to make all effort to avoid a major operation by doing logical natural things that do no harm. Normal walking, normal exercise, normal access to fresh air, and a healthy diet and lots of rest, and avoiding second hand smoke.

LOCAL OR MEDICAL POLICIES CANNOT DENY THE NATION'S LAWS OR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ANY ONE PERSON. NOT UNLESS THERE HAS BEEN PROPER DUE PROCESS OF LAW TO TAKE THOSE RIGHTS AWAY.  THE MEDICAL POLICIES OF SELF-GOVERNING GROUPS CANNOT TAKE AWAY AN INDIVIDUAL'S  RIGHTS AWAY. SELF-REGULATING GROUPS, THEMSELVES, ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL OBLIGATION TO OTHERS:

The facts are no policy of any institution or medical organization can take away a person's rights to self-determination and rights to information for informed choice. Such institutions are mostly not advocating a signed Birth Contract of what cannot be done to the pregnant's mother's body, or done to her newborn child, such as not clamping the umbilical cord or cutting the cord.

RETURN TO TRADITIONAL PRIMAL BIRTH RIGHTS, NOW CALLED LOTUS BIRTH:

There is a new positive trend to assure the child is not deprived the placenta blood for harvesting purposes. This is called Primal Birth Traditions or now called the Lotus Birth, after a now deceased person, Clare Lotus Day.  She sought to return to primal birth, and did so in a San Francisco hospital.  The Lotus birth is what the pioneer's did, the fathers and the mothers of that time not being sissy in child birth by fainting to see the placenta birthed or it to remain with their baby. Many pioneers did no clamping or cutting the cord, ever. They avoided cord infection, and navel hernias, and had blue ribbon babies, strong in all their immunities.  The facts are, only if the cord tore or for placenta previa might a cord be clamped. This is the right of choice of the mother to primal birth rights. No institution can legally clamp that cord or cut it off, without the parents seeking compensation for no informed choice for primal birth rights respected.

Again, the benefit and rights to the child are:  no navel cord infections from a cut cord and navel hernias because there is no weight on the cord. The placenta is off in a day or time's. The placenta is just put into a diaper. It is allowed to air while the child is sleeping. You keep the cat out of the room, too.  If you watch your cat birth, very rarely allowed to be seen by humans, animals seek to go away from the ignorance of man, in natural birth, but the cat will nuzzle the placenta and if it is still throbbing, the cord, she leaves it alone.  Only after the placenta and the cord are still, will she eat the placenta for her own nourishment. Otherwise, an inexperienced cat, may eat the whole kitten, not just the placenta.  The cat goes by instinct. They naturally know if something is pulsating, and in doubt, leave it alone. People should have as much instinct too, as did the pioneers, and not anxious to cosmetically remove the placenta from the baby.   

    This method, Lotus Birth, or Primal Birth traditions is much more logical and safer to the child then a cut cord. Why?  The research and experience reveals that a cut cord takes from  5 days to 15 days, to heal. And, with every day with a cut cord, there is a risk of blood infections. The facts are 500,000 babies die annually of cut cords by infections, even those babies born in the cleanest of Western Hosptials...some not so clean, any more. There are no infections of no tied or cut cords, the primal birth way, and right of all mothers, of their own choice to return to this method of care.  See Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration at the Table of Contents:   www.lotusbirth.com/_cont260.htm

RISK OF RINGER'S SOLUTION IS THE SWITCH TO NARCOTICS OF REQUESTED NO NARCOTIC DRUGGED BIRTH:

This Ringer's solution takes the place of beverages or food to keep up the mother's strength during labor, or her movement.  It is unnatural. No policy can direct this IV treatment or  unnatural monitoring of the baby's brain, or things stuck on the mother's stomach, so her movement is restricted; or the breaking of her water.  Without the birthing mothers informed consent and the risk of things inserted and dripped into her body, this Ringer's solution can be easily changed to a narcotic, such as, Demerol or morphine, or their mixture with oxytocin. The mother is not aware she or the baby are in danger of such drugging and manipulation of her child's birth.

This is because of the narcotic disguising the now fast and harsher labor contractions, that distress the child, and will produce meconium . If the child is forced to gasp because of an immediate clamped cord, the child is at risk of sucking the meconium into his/her expanding lungs. This can lead to the disease of the lungs and to the heart, as well, and to the brain.  Babies are threatened with the gagging of their small throats and throat injury by aggressive suctioning, too, and sucking out natural bacteria in their nose, as well.  See pH word Glossary, Lysozyme .

STRUGGLING FETUS, DISTRESSED BY ACTIVE MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:

The fetus fears dying from lack of oxygen, after injections into the mother's system with morphines and oxytocins . The hard and close together contractions of the man-made oxytocin and the natural oxytocin, have been known to cause the uterus to have long hard close together contractions. The baby is distressed because the contractions are depriving the child oxygen. What is also happening, that cannot be seen, is that the placenta may be pulling away prematurely from the womb. When the fetus's distress is noted, often the mother then must go to an emergency c-section birth. Or else, her child may be born stillborn.  The child, by this manipulation is likely to be compromised, such as being caused to have Cerebral Palsy, which is not an inherited disorder.  Or, the child later to be observed, while looking normal to have learning and behavior problems. Such are various forms of autism. Again 1 in 110 children, under 11 years of age, have autism...and it is an epidemic and most will be found to have had drugs during labor and during the birth of the child, followed by early clamping. Such birth trauma was then compounded with injections of the heavy weight metal, ethylmercury.  Why is atomic number 80, which is what mercury is, being injected into creatures.  There is a bacteria that thrives on mercury, and it feeds on the gases used to cause the cells to reproduce and have energy, such as on sulfur and oxygen. The size of the molecule mercury is said, alone, can cause heart attacks. This is by stopping the tiny blood systems going through the capillary and blood vessels. So what of the other gases that are being used on the mother, too.

I wonder if the chemists know this information, of the dangers of using mercury injected inside the blood stream.  I wonder if they did their duty to have advised the drug companies of the risk of using such metals in medical drugs?  We have no why of knowing without a Court Order to find out the source of ethyl or methyl mercury.  Or, to know if the mercury may have been also radioactive recycled metals.  This would make it that much worse to be injected into a tiny baby, or any person.

 We take a lot of things for granted on trust.  Our world is not trustworthy any more.  Even before 9-11, the world was deceitful. In writing this article, it is hoped that in each community we can make an effort to hold the professionals accountable for false information regarding child birth, presently, published in tax-paid for biology textbooks, and presented in tax supported prenatal classes taught in the communities.  It is hoped to see an effort to hold the professional medical groups accountable for allowing bogus policies directing any one child to be endangered by hasty clamping of the cord, or using endangering drugs.  This is when such policies are merely opinions, but the facts of harm can be visual fact that can be seen of the placenta drained out of the deprived blood of every child that was early umbilical cord clamped. This is when that need not be done at all, unless the cord had torn or for placenta previa. Both these happenings would then require an investigation if such instances was a form of medical malpractice to endanger the child, needlessly.  Mothers who have requested no clamping of their infant's umbilical cord, have been roughly managed, the militancy of the medical persons being strong, they will not be told by a birth contract what they will or will not to do a mother or her child.

To avoid that risk of militancy, one should learn how to have an emergency birth plan.  The threat to one mother requesting no clamping of her child's blood, of European blood line, was committed in Langley BC, November 2003. In that City, the medical persons caused a questionable rough handling on the mother by pushing her child back inside the womb. This damaged the mother's womb, and caused infections to the risk of her life, is to mean birth in the security of your own home. In Florida, and in Ontario Canada, the medical persons lied about a fear of the mother bleeding and imposed early clamping on the pulsating umbilical cords.  In New Zealand, an anesthetists, on February 22, 2004, alleged a bogus death of a mother because she had refused drugs in child birth.  He was saying if she had accepted syntocinon, she would not have bled to death, nor would her child be at the risk of dying, too. The police said the doctor did not write the bogus letter, but the source of the email came from the same person of other letters. It will be interesting if doctors can write letters to try to stop informed choices of mothers in child birth.

The letter was intended not to have web sites to help mothers find information to make informed choices...do the mothers want to be actively managed, if they consent, will they have legal grounds since most of the care causes internal damages to them and their babies, and often latent in discovery.  And, if not, they ought to be educated to birth unassisted in their own homes and keep themselves safe from deceptive reasons. The bogus policies have political profits in management of the mothers and the babies. The bogus policies, for early cord clamping,  are being used to alibi the control over the baby to harvest their placenta blood making the babies weaker.   

If you are not up to fight the politics of the medical system, who place fear in the hearts of all communities as to their power, and you do not want to be vulnerable to raising a damaged and compromised child, it is wise to stay out of the system of controlled and manipulated births.  This control is by both men and women who are business persons in the medical services.  This includes midwives, who are using, too, the training in Active Management that plays the system for time efficiency and higher fees.  The increase of internal damages, particular in children, show Active Management works.  It is increasing repeat internal business that even many lawyers not educated on what is going on, fear to tackle, unless immediate physical damage was evident, blind, deaf, mute, paralyzed, the extreme of internal injuries.  (See the Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law, Ontario, Canada, handled by Sommers and Roth).  

The child then becomes the burden of the parents, mostly, or the increase of medical services and education costs being a burden to the community. Those in the medical system and created the bogus policies and the questionable randomized trials, have walked away being accountable.  The internal damages to likely over 50 percent of our population.  Think about it 1 in 4 adults with a bad heart?  1 in 16 babies with some kind of defect.  1 in 110 children now with various forms of behavior and learning problems, subtle to serious, called autism.  Cerebral Palsy is increasing and it can be subtle to serious.  CP is not inherited. And the mysterious Crib Deaths, the list can go on and on.  

The parents of tomorrow must allow themselves the benefit of the doubt that the mother can have a healthy baby, at her own convenience born safely in the home. This can only be achieved by returning to Traditional Primal Birth Rights, all women can have, no matter where they live. This means an undrugged birth right in you own a nice warm bath tub. There is not need to cut a woman's body for a gravity birth or a sideways birth, or forward sitting, because in these positions her birth canal is NOT closed by up to 30 percent, as is the flat on the back or semi-sitting birth positions. Warm water births in gravity positions can minimize the risk of even minor tears, that heal without stitches, in most instances.  

This right of the mother's choices and for  self-control and determination is a return to the pioneer's freedom.  To birth unassisted is a must until the good, morale, ethical and competently trained medical persons break away from bogus policies and misleading randomized trials, so they can attend a birth, even as a birth witness.  

Those current medical persons, who do know better, must begin to report the false medical policies now controlling by special groups in the medical system, including the false training of c-section surgeons, who clamp the cord, then cut it then remove the baby.  This is wrong, for they can removed the baby as a biological reciprocal sealed unit, keeping the child and the placenta warm for the completion of the child's transfusion of blood from the placenta to the child's expanding lungs. They know this as was done by T. Peltonen, 1981.  See T. Peltonen at www.lotusbirth.com.

The professionals who know truth and logic and with visual observed facts, can best do their duty to protect the public by speaking up in each community. This must begin in their own city.  And/or by turning some kind of a State Witness, using the Court system to insist there be a Commissioned Public Inquiry to deal with the false policies that can be visually seen bogus and the increase of internal injuries to children, whose parents can testify drugs and early clamping were the major contributing factors, and while the child was yet anemic, the community vaccinated the weakened child.

The child care birth practices, at present, in the community services are not trustworthy other then to provide a "living" child, but not a blue ribbon baby. The medical associations, like the Colleges of Physicians, Surgeons, and Midwives and the Professional Association of Nurses, and the Ambulance Medics and First Aids, are allowing a trend of the harvesting of most babies. All babies, even sick babies are being deprived their full share of the placenta blood.

The hospitals, by way of their ethics committees were first involved in allowing no informed consent, and concealed that they were in their forms of appropriate discarding, were not burning the placentas. But, in many instances, were selling the placenta tissues and membranes and the extractions of the various substances of the blood.  Or, they permitted their doctors to do this.  The doctors or the midwives were involved, too, in the selling of the placenta blood drained by agents within the hospital. The hospitals allowed the extra billings, and their own billings for that kind of organ and tissue services. The billings were either private or done by the hospital's accounting department.

Parents and parents-to-be are not being helped or educated to prevent this violation of trust.  It is a Constitutional issue.  It is civil and it may be criminal violations to both the mother and child. This is because active management is not a necessary service, in most instances.  It can be traced back to internal bodily harm, assault, battery, and attempted murder.  To the child it is an offense against the person.  The communities, as to their elected officials are, vicariously, at fault for failing to provide truthful information seen in visual evidence and prevented from being made known and seen equally to all citizens, in their tax supported resource centers.

The medical system simply cannot be controlled or trusted, at this time.  I for one, have lost confidence in homebirths attended by midwives, they concealed their intent and did spring surprises on the use of oxytocin and early clamping for bogus reasons, not shared in opportune time for the mother to make an informed decision, to protect herself or the child from unnecessary risk taking.  To know what it means a stitch in time saves nine, suggests avoidance is the best practice of risk, and home births unassisted may be the better way to go.  This means the mother is not left alone, but has her own family present, to protect her baby and not professional persons who are not willing to sign a birth contract, for a no hands on birth. Otherwise, it will take much energy and finances to fight the system.

The fighting of an medical system, deemed without conscience, if not unethical, must be done, and in each community. The big bad wolf or blood vampire is not in the next town...he/she is in your own community. They have moved from the control and power over the babies, who cannot fight back, to even organized cooperation of families putting other family members down against their will.  The community are closing an eye to the abuse of the medical system and that is coming from the Coroners and the Police officials in each community.

Only the members of the community can stop the unprofessional medical services that are using bogus policies, that are set to undermine the Constitution of most Nations and Due Process of Law by obstructing justice by destroying evidence and failing to keep proper records of fact of care.

Only the members of the community can investigate the unnecessary practices intended to be imposed on the uneducated birthing mother and thus, they injure her child, internally. Their intent is to destroy all records of failure in their duties. The intent is not to record the condition of the umbilical cord, that it was red, firm, and pulsating when clamped. That fact of the condition of the cord, functioning, was not shown to the birth witness of the mother and/or her spouse.

Those in the birth room, the medical professionals, intended to conceal the fact of the weight of the placenta, and the placenta contents. This was the blood that was drained from the placenta, and they concealed where it went, and who benefited from the baby's deprived blood. It likely was the hospital who had its agents work for the benefit of the hospital in extra income. This was by providing the cosmetically removed organ to be practically used by the medical system.  But in doing that, no matter how worthy of a cause they believed in, it was a belief violated to some persons, and a constitutional right violation to have had informed consent.  The medical system and its bogus policies were failing to advise the amputation of the placenta is not for any medical need or purpose, as is the same situation of the circumcised children, also violated by breach of trust of true informed consent.  In the same manner the placenta was harvested and sold, so were the foreskins removed without medical cause, and they were sent for profits to the burn tissue banks. Again, without informed consent.

___________________________________________

Please visit this web link for a Petition to Protect Baby and the Mother, Too :   www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

A medical web site  that may answer your questions is at:   www.cordclamping.com

Table of Contents is at:   www.lotusbirth.com/_cont260.htm   (See Placenta, Fetus Circulation, Fetus Development, T. Peltonen, Mavis Gunther, Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration and her Ode to My Placenta.

References of studies with comments is at:   www.lotusbirth.com/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Home page:   www.lotusbirth.com

Originally Posted: April 6, 2004