Placenta the mother should have this always examined. She has a legal right to keep it in her own freezer, this
is her choice.
EXAMINING THE PLACENTA IS A DUTY AND TO DOCUMENT ALL DETAILS ON THE CHILD'S MEDICAL CHART.
In this report, below, the most the medical institutions are going to spend on the placenta examination is one-minute. Much information is going to be left off regarding the care and treatment to the child during and after birth. This missing information is world wide. Policies are planned and part of the medical system and for good reasons the medical persons (male and female have profits to themselves) are, as a trend today, harvesting the placenta and placenta blood.
http://www.aafp.org/afp/980301ap/yetter.html
Examination of the Placenta
JOSEPH F. YETTER III, COL, MC, USA,
This harvesting of the baby's placenta blood, that belongs inside the baby's
expanding lungs is from most all babies who are born into the hands
of a licensed medical persons who earn income in the government and/or private for profit medical institutions.
Many involved in the harvesting of
the child are in it for the grant money paid to them by the various government levels that must be investigated
to whom is getting the money and
why. Grant money can involved research of the baby's deprived blood suspensions of research using hormones,
enzymes, and stem cells. The red,
white blood cells are pooled and the platelets. The placenta is ground up for hormones
and enzymes, and the membrane sold to tissue banks, as
is the same fate of the foreskin taken from circumcised babies. Concerns of Donna Young, Natural Birth
Education April 4, 2004
The Army officer and author, of the above report, does have some good pictures of the placenta.
They are very educational that parents-to-be
should investigate. Should they have a compromised child, the placenta can give the clues why. It would be naturally human instinct to cover up of
evidence associated with drugs and vaccinations that are alleged to be causing so many persons to be
internally injured. The medical system is a
drug system. Drugs cause the medical system to be time efficient, particularly, in child birth.
Those in the medical system are not going to do anything to reveal the harm
they caused a child to be compromised; nor keep the evidence but
destroy the evidence as quickly as possible. What is destroyed is the placenta. The drugs given a
mother during labor or gases, cross the
placenta and will leave some forensic evidence. The parents, are none-the-wiser what has gone
on, as this is a happy moment just to have a living
baby...which is all the expectation the can expect from the system. Yes, the parents will have
a living baby, not the blue ribbon baby God ordained
them to have. Most parents of the child did not give informed consent of the risk taking
of drugs and gases offered her or the risk of early cord
clamping on her love-child to be anemic and vulnerable to the challenges of life ahead of it.
Often uneducated fathers, regarding child birth, support this medical system.
These fathers are as falsely trained in their high school
biology classes, as are the women, and in the prenatal classes as well. But the fathers, knowingly
or not, often cause their wives to trust the medical
system rather then a nice home warm water birth, at her convenience and the child's. A loving
father would support an educated woman in this
choice of no drugged birth as a primal birth right to all women.
It is a breach of trust to the father as well, for often father's are lied to
when they too ask questions, of their doctors. One father, December
2003, with his wife, were objecting to a c-section. He said, the Doctors, were pushing and pushing this
be done. When he asked about not
clamping the cord for a c-section baby, the father was lied to. He was told, "No, the
baby cannot be removed intact from the womb. This is a lie
See T. Peltonen, at www.lotusbirth.com.
But, some of the fathers are impatient and do not want to take the time to learn
the facts of the medical system that their wives and child are in
danger of any institutional birth and the training of the current doctors. So many of the medical
trends are tied into profits. I was told early clamping
was a trend by the BC Registrar of the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Dr. Van Andel. The
trend is filling up various blood types in the stem
cell blood banks.
Profits over healthier and safer options or protection of security to the baby
to have all their own blood inside them, are then absent of ethics,
morals and competency in the training of the doctors. These doctors, as to the trend of
our times, are not trained in primal birth, natural birth, or
no hands on birth, or the comfort of birth in warm water and the birth of the placenta, too. Why
not? Nor, their nurses so trained in harmless
births. Why Not? To answer my own question. There is no money in primal births. No
profits to be made. There is no cutting, no drugs, no
money from blood sold and tissues. It may be as simple as that.
With primal birth, there is no repeat business of sickness of injured
mothers with internal blood infections, and future thyroid
problems from ingredients in the drugs given, like chlorobutanol. There is no profit of
children taken for diet control for anemia, and treatments of
cancer and brain tumors. All consequence of drugs and hasty clamping, if the facts were checked
back to active management.
Again, it may be as simple as that. Healthy babies and healthy mothers
do not bring repeat business of sickness, nor increase revenues to the
governments. Governments have a financial interest in higher incomes and higher profits from drug companies
and from the agents of drug
companies, the doctors and the hospitals.
No drugged women in child birth, who are re-educated to return to home births,
bring no increased revenues to governments. It is political
manipulation. And the profits are political. Therefore, we have motives for active management
for the harvesting the baby's placenta and placenta
blood. That is a billion dollar business that no politician from any level of government has
stopped endangering of any one child in any once
community, so far. Why not? Why has not the politician at any level of government stopped
this breach of fiduciary trust. It is an implied duty of
Oath, as to uphold the Nation's laws do no harm to any person, who is a citizen of the Nation.
Primal Birth, Lotus birth, or Natural birth, no matter what you
call it, is the better way to go. This is if you want no law suits and days
in court and a blue ribbon baby, and a healthy mother to raise healthy babies.
PRESENT VICTIMS IN THE USA- BUDGET OF $20 BILLION DOLLARS OUGHT TO BE FROZEN FOR ALL PAST
VICTIMS:
I would think that if you are an adult with a mother to testify you were likely harvested, and drugged, and without true informed consent, and who was also early cord clamped, may have a compensation waiting in a settlement. The target for compensation is your portion of the present baby-birth-budge in the USA. This is a $20 Billion dollar budget now used without good reason in delivery of babies in institutions today, using active management. The last report I had from a mother with a sick autistc child, was that her medical insurance plan paid $20,000 for a vaginal birth. They used drugs, and had to revive her, as well as the child. This budget could be reserved for the past victims, as the State does it duty to re-educate the woman to birth to morrow in safer primal birth choices. There is not good reason that institutions would not allow a rented room, with a Birth contract, this is a hand's off birth, of the mother's choosing.
Only 3 to 5 percent of that budget is needed for true c-section births. All
other births can be undrugged birth naturally allowed to be in warm
water. This is no harm done and following a no drugged birth is the no clamping of the umbilical cord.
So we will have blue ribbon babies, who are
strong, from now on, Therefore, the $19 to $20 billion dollars, can be requeted by Due Process
of Law that the State owes the early clamped and
drugged victimized babies this amount for past internal injuries until they die. Healthy blue
ribbon babies will be born, if the mother was re-educated and the father of the child, to conceive
in healthy bodies, and the mother remains undrugged, and with no pollution in their area (dream
on, eh).
So, if you are a victim of past active management, I do encourage you, if I
were you, to use the courts as a Fact Finder. AFter filing a Writ for
civil damages, the courts can determine if there was, indeed, a breach of trust and medical malpractice.
Only the courts allow fact finding "after" the
Writ for medical malpractice has been filed.
WRIT FILING FOR ACTIVE MANAGEMENT INTERNAL INJURIES:
Ideally, this Writ Filing, is done in yet a minor's name, and possible including the mother's name as a victim who did not give informed consent. And, father's may be considered as a third party injured for now having a sick wife, and a compromised child. Where is this action taken? Ideally, in your own local community, for a start. Name the doctor, the nurse, and the Hospital, et all. And you may check your local school's biology textbooks and library resources, as they used taxpayer's money to fool society on active management and the child's umbilical cord. Most textbooks and in the school's use for biology, directed immediate cord clampng.
You may consider entering the School District as a Third Party to the Action. The committees choosing the authors and the textbooks, used the
tax dollars and they selected the first source of false information in biology textbooks. Again,
they misled the area of women, yet to have babies
and they provided false information or no information. Also, the prenatal classes in the community that
equally did not factually warn or inform the
truth of active management and early cord clamping precautions and to have a signed Birth Contract to
protect the mother and the child from the
doctors intent, or false training intended to be imposed as to the will of the doctor...not informed
consent.
That is how I understand the rights to use the Court to allow the Judge to decide
on this issue, of breach of trust, and false information provided
in the community and put into practice in the community hospital. The hospital had a duty best practice
possible least risk of harm...and again, that
is, in most cases, primal births, natural births, no hands on births...and mothers can do this as pregnancy
is not a sickness, but natural to women,
only. Women must not be discriminated against in any way...and they are if the information regarding
reproduction and natural birth process was
obstructed by false statements. And another area of cause of concern is The Merck Manual on this
issue. This corporation, the pubnlisher, too
misdirected those in the community, the doctors and nurses who use their reference directives.
As the defendants at the local level begin to point the finger to the State
or the Federal Government, add them to the Writ as well. (see: What
are the duties of the community:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-625.htm
Can the father and mother be named as a defendant, if they file a Writ in
the Child's name? Yes. This is highly likely, if the other side
thinks they were in some way a contributing factors of a compromised child. However, if the habits
of the mother or father could have been known
by the doctor, the duty was not to compound the child's injury by doing drugs or early clamping.
The duty of the professional person(s) was to err on the side of caution of
a no fault primal birth...would have been the wiser choice.
And what of the alibi of bad genes? It is hard to prove that
bad genes of the parent or of the child would have caused the child's condition.
In such cases of bad genes, it is an over-used alibi that the doctors and their control of many non-profit
organizations involving ADDs and Autism,
have been using.
This alibi "bad genes" has motive. It is used to cause the parents
to not go back to discover bad birth practices called active management. Bad
Genes is a form of concealment of the motive of active management not taking the responsibility or the
consequences of its actions for profits by
time managements using: drugs, and tools and cutting the mother's body (c-sections and episiotomy)
to help deliver a baby unnaturally to a woman.
THINK AHEAD - SAVING THE PLACENTA, FROZEN, FOR MONTHS, OR YEARS, TO ASSURE THE BABY'S LEGAL
RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED:
Rarely is the placenta saved for litigation purposes for probable internal damage to the child by active management. But it is a legal right for the parents to take the organ home and store it themselves in a freezer, if complications of the child's future, are likely to set in. Or, to have the placenta tested for drugs by an institution of their choice, or several pieces of the organ going to different labs, and out of that state, for forensic testing of drugs given the mother during the child's birth.
The duty of the hospital's is to provide every billing code and the costs of
the total care and treatment to her and the baby, and all test's results.
A complete record of the billings can be directed by the courts, or in Discoveries. Interrogatories
of training of the medical persons are great, and
to find out the policies of the hospitals in what they do with the placenta, generally. And what
was done in this case for this child's property?
The hospital and its agents, its lab or the nurse or the doctor, should not
be destroying that organ instantly or the placenta's blood contained and
trapped there by a clamp.
And how much blood was drained from it ought to have been documented on the
child's own medical chart. Also, to be mentioned is the the
time the cord was clamped and the position of the child's body when the cord was clamped. These
are all part of care and treatment to the child,
during or after birth. The placenta, and the placenta blood, ought to be have been kept until
the child was out of danger, and then some.
Particularly, if the child suffered early clamping on top of the drugs given the mother.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE:
To destroy the evidence, is an obstruction of justice. And this is going on as to the placenta facts of the risk of drugging the fetus during labor. All gasses and drugs, however given, all cross the placenta. The placenta can give the evidence to the degree of risk to the child. Some of these drugs can cause mental retardation (Oxytocin, for example as is reported by the World Health Organization and they direct another risk to the child, anemia, by early cord clamping).
Perhaps, The W.H.O. directors, in this statement, without a medical reference or clinical study mentioned, can be named, Internationally, added as a third party. This is because W.H.O. on checking with the Food and Drug Officials, at least in Canada, did not alert the communities who were yet using oxytocin as a commonly used drugs. The excuse it is used according to one drug company, they do state oxytocin is used to stop women from bleeding, after the birth of the child. but it is injected full strength, often, when the baby's head is emerging, and W.H.O. directs immediate cord clamping if that is done. W.H.O. states that the oxytocin when it crosses the placenta destroys brain cells, or possibly the future development of them, if yet buds of cells.
Midwives are licensed to inject oxytocin, or give it by pills or powders, mixed
in foods. and are directed to carry oxygen to attempt to revive
the early clamped child. But most babies will not live on oxygen alone, and will struggle to live and
die about 14 minutes later. This is of low blood
volume and shock. (Death of such a baby in my own home town that went without respect of a wrongful
death investigation was October 8, 2000).
Oxytocin goes by the name of Pitocin, Syntocinon, and Toesen. This mental
slowness, attributed to drugs and hasty clamping, reflected in the
child's learning will be latent in discovery, maybe past 9 years of age. Early clamping, and brain
lesions are known to be caused by drugs and hasty
clamping since the 1960's. (Read Chapter, Time Bomb, The Magical Child, pages 48-50, by the educator
Joseph Chilton Pearce. When autism
was 1 in 30,000 children, in the 1970's, (World Book, Vol. A, p 913, 1979), today, Senator Dan Burton,
claimed autistic children are 1 in 110.
These brain-damaged children often grow to be 6 ft. and can become uncontrollable. Many of these behavior
problematic children have attacked
their parents who cannot manage them any more than then the educators or society can. If they
compound their problems with drugs and alcohol
you best stay out their way.
All children have a right to be born by Primal Birth Care and Treatment, natural
birth, now called Lotus Birth, or gentle births. These were the
types of births our grandmothers had the privilege of in their own homes. This was prior to about 1920's,
for rural women, and about 1901, for the
city ladies. When you review the history of the various medical organizations they were politically
astute to see higher incomes in maternity care.
They organized and took over maternity and brought them under a political system in all institutions,
and created policies that women believed they
had to have a doctors policies imposed on them, or the nurses, or the administration policy, and that
women had to obey those policies as to the
touching and care of the birth of their child. The husbands went along with this, it was control
either by them, or by the doctor the state or the
hospital to two vulnerable groups, the pregnant woman and the newborn child. They did absolute anything
they wanted to do to the mother's body.
If you think this is wrong, it is still going on, and your help is needed at a Petition, www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814.
The control was subtle, and it began before the women had a vote in the States
or in Canada, and now that we have a vote, we do not know
yet how to deal with this in a political fashion to deal with those yet doing harmful medical policies
on women and children. The control over the
woman's body, a form of discrimination seemed to be an extension of control over women by their parents,
then the husband. then passed on to the
doctor, who used a political club of threat to the woman to be imprisoned if she did not submit to their
care in childbirth. The intent of the law is
really for any women who intended to deliberately damaged her child, to kill, infanticide. But it was
used to force women to submit to a medical
doctor, who intent of delivery and use of drugs followed by immediate cord clamping was never revealed
and concealed as a surprise, the doctor
having the power of life and quality of life of that particular child. And this was to his power to
sex of the child, to the color, the race, to the marital
status, to the mental and physical disadvantaged. All this is in financial political realms that society
has not yet dealt with, in a Court of law, that there
was no informed consent as to this care and treatment going on.
Women today, have horror stories that best belong in a court if their doctor,
or nurse or hospital still exist. In my case, all do, to my own birth
experience, they still exist, to what I consider criminal policies imposed without informed consent. And yes, I would like my case, as well as
millions of other woman's birth stories told in the courts, for compensation by the organizations involved
in maternity care and policy they knew or
ought to know were harmful to both the mother and the child. High operating tables, flat on the
back birth positions, morphines, cutting of the
body, and early clamping of the child are not normal or natural, or necessary. Most women had experience
by bogus policies and no informed
consent what is really assault, battery, and attempted murder.
None of the medical policies imposed were done with informed consent. Nor were
the policies of true medical procedures, at all, but they were
political, for profits that aided the doctor to have the birth over and done with...or by increasing
the costs by more services offered.
Women and children just were not treated with much respect. This yet goes
on in medical institutions, world wide. The medical policies, yet,
today, and the harvesting of babies, have yet to be dealt with in our schools, our churches, our governments
at all levels, and only women can deal
with this issue. They must deal with in in the Courts, in each community.
The medical policies and manuals were business policies of convenience. They
were controlled and thought up by the doctors, themselves.
They served no good reason but time efficiency. They served a means to get placentas for blood
components, also, if the present is the key to the
past, as to harvesting baby's blood for stem cell, now in the open. Brought into the open by private
stem cell blood banks, wanting their cut in the
action of research grants, and income from separation of the blood components, of white cells, red cells,
stem cells, hormones, enzymes,
plasma...minerals...all sold back to the sick, and created sick, from birth by active management.
The hospital's administration and income from organs, tissues and blood, and
the nurses getting along with this knowing right from wrong, and
the doctor were in collaboration with each other and all medical institutions. They were combined controlling
and manipulating his/her knowledge in
the medical crafts involving secrecy. The government always appointing their own representatives in
how they would protect the people in the care
and services and they failed to have best practice possible in the best interest of the medical consumer
in this area, of child birth.
The medical policies of active management, was a breach of trust as to no true informed consent or for the choice of safer options, and the false information in the textbooks, is a form of discrimination to women. They can't protect themselves.
We can see the false information, in most biology textbooks and in most controlled
gender bias medical manuals, are self-evident in the writings
in The Merck Manual. These policies and manuals fail to uphold independence of choice to the woman
in controlling what is or is not done to her
person. They never remind the doctors informed choice, or the right of women to have a Signed Birth
Contract of what is not done. Of course, this
puts responsibility on the women to be educated on such matters of what is natural birth.
WOMEN LOST POWER OVER NATURAL BIRTH IN THE MID 1800's IN CANADA AND IN THE STATES:
The organization of medical societies began in 1847 when the USA doctors joined together to form the Amercian Medical Association AMA and the Canadian Medical Association was formed in 1867, and by 1910, the various medical schools that trained women and those in lower income levels, were being closed for lack of finances. One of the first American Indian woman to become a physician, was Susan La Flesche Picotte (1865-1915). She eared an M.D. degree in 1889 from the Women's Medical College of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. She graduated at the top of her class. In 1913, Picotte established a hospital on the reservation. Susan La Fleshe was born on the Omaha reservation and attended government and mission schools there. Her father, the chief of the Omaha tribe, believed that Indians could survive only by following white ways of life. She studied at the Elizabeth Institute of Young Ladies in Elizabeth, N. J., and graduated from Hampton Institute in Hampton, Va. In 1894, she married Henry Picotte a farmer of French and Sioux Indian ancestry. (1) World Book, vol P. p 403, 1979.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching issued a report
called Medical Education in the United States and Canada,
and certain schools were not able to get Provincial or State funding. In this report,
the U.S. educator Abraham Flexner approved only 1 of
155 medical schools as acceptable. The only school approved was the John Hopkins Medical School, founded
in Baltimore in 1893. (2) World
Book, Vol. M. p306f -306g. 1979
Midwives were not being upgraded in any of the medical schools but were being
threatened to be put in jail, if they assisted, as they once had,
in home births. Midwives were lost to Canada and the States but not in European countries. The
midwife, generally, a neighbour, did this service
for little pay. In the year of 1901, there was advances in experiments in blood transfusions,
as to the blood typing of A B O discovered by Karl
Landsteiner. The harvesting of babies for experimental blood would be to the secrecy of what went
on behind the closed doors as to
institutionalized births becoming a forced decision on most women.. By the 1940's blood transfusions
without reactions were now possible with the
understanding of Rh blood types. We can certainly assume trends of need of blood and experiments
would be associated to the First World War
1914- 1918, to the now controlled political institutional births. We can assume changes of medical
practices and policies in trends for the need of
blood again in the Second World War, 1939-1945. Trends obeyed in the medical arts and services
are to the changes of societies interest and
ethics. Today, the trend has been for the need of blood from babies by early clamping is for stem cell
research.
There is higher compensation to collectors of blood types for experimental
stem cell for brain, heart and stroke victims, and for nervous cell
experiments, and in treatment of cancers. That fact of value on a few ounces of stem cells was
the fact of disclosure was valued at $30,000. This
was paid by Australia for such experimental stem cells to be used in transplants. Now, Australia
harvest their own babies. Early cord clamping for
harvesting the blood is a world wide dangerous trend to all babies being born today. All levels
of government have turned a blind eye to this, and it
is an issue that must be dealth with in each community, world wide.
Whatever the reasons doctors are doing early clamping and following drugging
of women it must be dealt with in the Court of Law. This is
because it is being done with participation of nurses and doctors involved blood collecting for compensation. The child is the victim and the parents
are not truly informed. Some parents are quite informed and think nothing to exploit their own
baby and sell their baby's deprived blood for
whatever they can cut a deal, of course, confidentially as to the money that changes hands. This can
be done after they have the medical person
send the baby's blood to a private blood bank, anywhere around the world.
DUTY - FIRST PROTECT THE PUBLIC (DO NO HARM) IS THE OATH OF ALL MEDICAL SOCIETIES:
The medical societies may think as long a child lives and they revive the child after drugging and early clamping they have not physically harmed the child...but they have cause internally damages, that are latent, often in discovery. The failure to keep accurate records of the care and treatment of the child is suspicious that they know they did harm to the child by offering the drugs to the pregnant women and following that with hasty clamping and no disclosure what they did with the placenta or the placenta blood, which can be from 1/2 cup of blood to 1 cup or 80 to 180 ml as to the average collection reported by stem cell blood banks.
While all medical associations, societies, and colleges were to have as their
first cause protection to the public, the various policies on child birth
have much to be desired. The Education bulletin #216 November 1995 was cancelled without public information
of its harm directing immediate
cord clamping on all babies, for a PH test. This was by the ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists. That policy was
upheld by the Canadian experts, SOGC, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Policy
#71, December 1998 and Policy #89
May 2000.
The Canadian SOGC was not approachable by the public when the policies are visually
seen to be bogus, nor were various Provincial Colleges
of Physicians, Surgeons and Midwives or the Association of Professional Nurses.
You can see the evidence of the placenta full of blood after early clamping
that this is not an issue of opinion, or more studies. It is a duty to
have informed the mothers and fathers clamping of the cord is not a medical need, but serves the medical
fields convenience in harvesting babies for
their placenta blood.
You can see or can suspect the reason of failing to disclose is part of not
wanting to self-incriminate by those involved in a child's birth failure to
keep accurate reports by both the nurses and the doctors. That this failure was likely linked to policies
of the administration of the hospitals that
permitted failure of full disclosure on such issues on the child's own medical charts. The hospital,
itself, may be involved as to possible profits, as
well, from the selling of the placenta and the placenta's contents. Otherwise, all facts of the
child care and treatment would have been recorded and
a documented copy would have been given to the parents, before they leave the institution with
just a "living" child. The child drugged during birth
(higher costs billed for the benefit of the hospital and staff), and early clamped, will be subtle to
seriously internally impaired. All medical groups
dealing with impaired children with learning problems were controlled in such a way to accept bad genes.
Such organizations controlled in such a
way that the parents, belonging to such non-profit groups, never went back or connected with each other
as to what are common factors cuasing
birth trauma. These will always be found to any internally damaged child, drugs and early umbilical
cord clamping. This is always follolwed, too, in
most cases, vaccinations while the child was yet anemic and not tested, in many situations a simple
test until the child was evidently sick.
WITHHELD INFORMATION ON THE TIME THE UMBILICAL CORD WAS CLAMPED AND AMOUNT OF BLOOD
TRAPPED IN THE PLACENTA:
The one-minute examination on the placenta does not direct the medical team to state to weigh the placenta, and measure it and drain the blood out of how much the baby was robbed of whole blood. Early clamping on a pulsating cord, and they can pulsate for twenty minutes, prevents the full transfusion of the nutrients of the whole blood being transfused into the child's expanding lungs.
SECRECY OF THE GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE ENTERPRISE BIRTH CENTERS AND HOSPITALS:
The intent of the institution or the midwife (if a homebirth) is to take the placenta. The intent of the ambulance medic in an emergency birth, is also to take the placenta, trapped with blood in it by directions of early clamping. The intent is to grind the placenta up for its extracts of blood components. The intent, either by the individual medical person or by the institution they work in, is to sell the hormones and enzymes to the highest bidders and to research.
This is theft. It is done without informed consent. It is breach of trust. It is an offense against the person. It is assault. It is battery, even if the
child did not die. It is attempted murder. It is wrongful death if the child died. It may be first
degree murder as to intent to do this to a child as to a
specific blood type that is posted in wanting so much for an adult's transplant of stem cells. Blood
posted as in need have been to those races with
exposure to radiation: Asian blood, Russian, European, Dutch-German, are in demand.
Those in the medical system and silent on this issue of what is going on are
taking advantage of uneducated and uninformed parents. The parents
by the false information in each community cannot protect their babies. Their trust is being breached
in each community hospital.
The deception is continous in the biology textbooks that do a poor job of informing
the parents-to-be of the breach of ethics going on in most
institutions of the past and of the current practices, today. The textbooks support the bogus
directive of early clamping on the "human" baby. They
would not dare direct such cruelty to animals but they do that directive on someone's baby that will
be weakened because of this misleading
information and false care to the human child.
Most community doctors, as nice as they are to your face, are business persons,
and the nurses and midwives too. To stop the deception,
parents-to-be need a signed Birth Contract of what cannot be done to the mother's body, in child birth,
or to the child. Suggestions to a birth
contract are available in the Table of Contents of www.lotusbirth.com or
www.lotusbirth.com/_cont260.htm
. This stops the system from being
dishonest and deceptive of using organs, tissue and blood without informed consent and depriving the
child all their full placenta blood during and
after birth.
Many bogus medical reasons are lied about by doctors and nurses who want to
be believed because of their status, not on the evidence that can
be brought before the courts of the amount of blood deprived any one child. The evidence is the
blood that can be and ought to be drained from
the placenta. The medical status people are attempting to say ths blood was not important to "them"
that the child was deprived 1/2 to 1 cup of
blood and that it was not important to "them" to record it on the child's own medical chart,
if indeed, it was deprived in good faith, no harm done.
Or that, it was not important, in their opinion for the child's needs, and they therefore poured the
blood down the drain, or burned it. Or if not
wasted they thought once the blood was now deprived the child, they could sell the blood for profit
for the benefit of the institution they worked in,
where the deed was done; or, that the doctor could sell it to the highest bidder by billing separately
for the collection of an organ or collecting of a
special blood type, or placing the blood in pools of various blood types.
FETUS TO NEONATE CIRCULATION SYSTEM:
Much of the medical information, today, is not telling the truth about the placenta being a lung-blood-bag to be transfused into the child's now expanding lungs. The volume of blood in the placenta is important to the needs of the infant. The placenta contains 60 percent blood that will be in the baby if not early clamped. The doctors lie, and say this blood is not important, in most instances. See MD Consult, Dr. Gabbes. This defense not important, in most instances, was the alibi that the doctors called the shots at their own convenience when and whose child they will early clamp and harvest the placenta for personal profits, and all concealed. Such medical references are used to give an alibi. But properly challenged in the Courts of Fact Finding, it will be found bogus, and as bogus as active management being the best practice possible and least risk of harm. Primal birth, natural birth, Lotus birth is the best practice possible. You can't go wrong with natural.
There is no nice way of telling what the doctors and their assistance, the nurses,
have been doing, except to speak the truth from personal
experience, and from research and speaking to others with similar drugging and hasty clamping. The
victims the children and so many with harder
lives because of the violations done to them, at birth.
The early clamping and harvesting the baby's blood has been a well kept
secret from the common folk. But it has been hotly debated in the
medical circles and reports since 1801. The secret was known, or ought to have been in all levels
of government. Who was kept in the dark, the
victims of the drugs and the clamp. These are the members of the general public, the working man,
the tax payer. The doctor controlled who at
what level would have the best chance at the careers and the jobs as to who was left least able to compete
fairly.
The secrecy of the clamping tool and the drugs, and the motives, political,
greater profits, as their motives, just shows that not too many in the
government levels can be trusted. They do not honour their Oaths taken to honour the Laws of their
Nation, and their Constitution. Only if you
deal with the dishonesty in a Court of Law will this dishonest medical system stop. That means stopped
in each community. Hopefully, the
judges rule on the facts found out per victim or victims if class actions are taken in each community
as per hospital's policy on this issue and the
degree of secrecy as to the doctor and the nurse and the records kept or not kept, for concealment and
cover-ups of care and treatment to the
woman and her baby or babies.
Parents must get wise to the smooth talking doctors of the medical system because
they are acting as though they were the agents of the
government and of the hospital. They are or were involved in allowing of the taking a child's DNA and
Genetic information from every parent's child
that the parent births into their hands. If the doctors did not themselves prosper by turning over the
organ to another agency, they breached a duty
of trust of informed consent where and to whom the organ and contents were going, and for what purpose
or the right of the parent to see the
placenta and blood burned.
No parent need ever birth into a stranger's hands, in the home or at the hospital,
ever again, as I see this breach of trust going on. The hospitals
are not safer places for child birth. They can only revive a child they have caused to be compromised
at birth. The report in Canada is 1 in 16
babies are having to be revived in institutional births.(See Table of Contents). This is
the trend of drugs and hasty clamping. Any revived child is a
compromised child, and impaired to the degree of blood deprivation and oxygen debt to any one cell.
Active management is the policy used to excuse this endangering to the mother
and the child. Hospitals do not offer other choices but they do
know or ought to know of the woman's natural rights to have a Primal Birth, a no hands on birth, even
at their hospital. These primal choices are
natural to the mother to have and no one need severe the cord or the placenta from the child, ever.
Only, if the cord tore or for placenta previa are
the reasons that could be presented as a need and benefit to the child, followed up with replacement
of the deprived blood and oxygen to the child.
Claming, therefore, is not a medical need, merely a cosmetic choice that belongs to the parents, the
legal guardian of the child.
Removal of the cord and placenta for medical reasons has been a lie. This
lie is similar to the lies for any alleged circumcision needed for
medical reasons, when there was no evidence the organ was diseased and removal of the foreskin was a
cure.. Both were being done for profits
and for merely cosmetic reasons. Both were a great risk of viral infections into the child's blood stream.
That virus can be fast of slow acting. The
placenta amputation by a clamping tool and cut...has been the cause of anemic babies and the drugs are
the cause of jaundice causing iron-overload. Removal of the child's foreskin has often resulted
in physically impaired children.
The fact finder of a court, that it will found true that any cosmetic removal
of the placenta can be removed safely in the home. To further
protect the baby that no blood will be taken from the placenta vein, the parents should never allow
the baby to go out of their site unattended by
any medical person in a hospital. Someone has a legal right to remain constantly with the child and
to guard the placenta so it is not syringed out the
blood from the child, if they remain a unit, as they should. The family doctors are not to be
trusted as they once were. They are business persons,
too, and a profit is a profit, even if it be the baby's blood that is at stake.
Someone should be observing the placenta and its draining if it remained inside
the mother's birth canal, after the cord was severed quickly after
the child's birth. The intent is to drain the placenta blood. This can be done by opening the
vein, and within 7-minutes the placenta has drained into
a blood-bag. Often the nurses are accomplices to this ritual. They know the doctors do not have the
informed consent of the mother or her choice
not to have been treated with such disrespect or that of her baby's rights not being protected
for security of person. The nurses have allowed an
offense against the person, the child. Often, the mother is not aware this is going on....she
is distracted and sheets block the medical persons
treating her, for this reason and that. And they put up no mirrors, either.
In an educated and informed unassisted birth, a mother does not have to worry
about such deception of a political system seeking both blood
and profits. But some parents may be as unethical in harvesting their baby as the doctors intend
to be. The parents, too, may be intending to sell
their baby's blood for $30,000 to the vast number of cord blood banks springing up around the world. The airplanes contract with such agencies,
so the blood and placenta are sent and delivered within 48 hours. Both can be treated by drugs to prevent
clotting of the blood. Heparin, is
generally used.
A loving parent, not in the game of harvesting their love-child, by natural
instincts, if followed, wait for the completion of the baby's organ, the
placenta to be born and do nothing to stop the pulsating cord. Animals do nothing. Follow
the animal's natural care and love to their offspring.
Only man is deceptive for profits to exploit, even their own child's blood. This was done recently by
a mother, in the Summer 2003, in New York,
who plotted the means to cause her baby to be born one-month early, and arranged the child to be early
clamped and havested of her placenta
blood. Why? Well the likely motive is that the Premature babies have higher quantity and
quality of stem cell blood. This mother likely had a rich
relative to pay her $30,000 for experimental blood, allowed to be given to relatives. Perhaps, they
plotted to deprive the girl-child of this blood.
Had the premature child gone into shock, the hosptial would revived a premature
child, top her up with another's blood and give her oxygen.
That the mother was getting the blood to be stored. The policies of early clamping going on routinely
for the same reason, getting the baby's blood
meant that this hospital had to go along for what they do, too, routinely, harvesting the baby's blood
to give it to whom they please.
. The mother was getting the chance of selling the blood, once it was paid to
be banked in a private stem cell blood. In such a parental request,
the doctors would require a waiver for their participation in the early clamping and draining the placenta
blood to be banked, privately. This is a
record of care and treatment to the child, should the child wish, someday to see all records of their
birth care and treatment.
The ethical parents, not seeking to store their baby's blood can only protect
themselves from the hospital and staff desire to rob their child's
blood by a signed birth contract...but there is no assurance it will be honoured. Or, that the mother
will not be aggresively revenged by then rough
handling. For example, a mother's baby was violentely pushed back up into her womb for the baby
being born face up. This was in the Langley
Hospital in BC. Fall of 2003.
This rough handling came after the mother had requested no clamping of her
baby's boy umbilical cord, ever. But she had no signed birth
contract. It is posssible and perceived that this team may have taken revenge for loosing the
profits of sale of special European blood. The baby
did fine, but it is unlikely after the infection in the mother's womb she'll ever have another child,
and this was her first. So if you to trust the medical
institutions to have a baby, you are certainly taking a chance that the mother will be roughly handled
if the mother does try to protect her baby from
being harvested by bogus policies.
Those that were involved in this, are, no doubt, hoping their rough handling
will not face a day in the criminal court. They are hoping appropriate
care and their bogus reasons will fool the judge they had a clinical study or policy that allowed them
to push the baby back for a face up
presentation. Would the judge tolerate the lie? In the Ing-case-law, Ontario Canada
by Roth and Sommers, the court granted an Award of 14
million dollars. The judge heard the bogus reasons of why a doctor used mid-forceps and clamped off
the child's circulation system. The Judge
thought the defense reasons unbelieveable. Will the Langley case, of the internally damaged woman,
ever get before a criminal court? Or will there
be a settlment and the medical malpractice never brought to the public's attention.
Doctors are lying to say they must remove the placenta.That is
only true if the cord tore or for placenta previa. The intent was always to
harvest the placenta for blood nutrients, that they separated and sold back to the sick. Your
baby owes nothing to society to give up their blood or
their hormones and enzymes, that God designed was to for the baby's and for no other.
A person does more harm then good to the child by this cosmetic removal of the
placenta and also of the foreskin of the children, forced to be
circumcised by traditions, habits and religion that threaten the child's well-being. The religious
institution is not caring for the child that is made sick
by infections of this ceremony any more caring then the medical insituttion carrying on the political
policies for profits of unnecessary medical
treatments that gave profits by the banking the tissues. This done by no informed consent.
Whare are these noble institutions, religion and the medical members when the
child was injured offering good in good will their financial
compensation to the child for directing these barbaric acts of unnecessary treatment for placenta removal
of foreskin removal. Look at the
deception, it took internet to disclose hidden profits in the selling of the hormones taken from such
tissues and used in tissue banks and without
informed consent. That is breach of trust. Those tissue banks and stem cell blood banks
ought to have their payments to the collectors made
public in a court of law.
There is no nice way to say, "Parents get wise." I do say, Please,
don't go with the medical system that has been dishonest for the last 3 and 4
generations by forcing women to birth in institutions and by using a political policy for time
management and convenience called active
management. This is when home births are more pleasant and unrushed to the mother and the
child.
I do say, as to past records of primal births, for natural births for
no drugs, no cutting and in warm water to just trust in yourself. The pioneers
had 97 percent of their births without complications. Do know that it is fear in the institutions
and for not knowing your body's own hormones that
one has difficulty. But that the use of drugs and the false birth positions, and infections by
cutting the mother's body, were in the past, and are still
today, at the root of causing birth trauma to the child and the mother. Primal birth, Natural
Birth, Lotus Birth does no harm in healthy woman.
http://www.aafp.org/afp/980301ap/yetter.html
Examination of the Placenta
JOSEPH F. YETTER III, COL, MC, USA,
Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, Washington To Quote them:
"A one-minute examination of the placenta performed in the delivery room
provides information that may be important to the care of both mother and
infant. The findings of this assessment should be documented in the delivery
records.
During the examination, the size, shape, consistency and
completeness of the placenta should be determined, and the presence of
accessory lobes, placental infarcts, hemorrhage, tumors and nodules should
be noted.
"The umbilical cord should be assessed for length, insertion,
number of vessels, thromboses, knots and the presence of Wharton's jelly.
The color, luster and odor of the fetal membranes should be evaluated, and
the membranes should be examined for the presence of large (velamentous)
vessels.
"Tissue may be retained because of abnormal lobation of the placenta
or because of placenta accreta, placenta increta or placenta percreta.
"Numerous common and uncommon findings of the placenta, umbilical cord
and
membranes are associated with abnormal fetal development and perinatal
morbidity. The placenta should be submitted for pathologic evaluation if an
abnormality is detected or certain indications are present."
__________________________________
Please visit this web link for a Petition to Protect Baby and the Mother, Too
:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
A medical web site that may answer your questions is at:
www.cordclamping.com
Table of Contents is at:
www.lotusbirth.com/_cont260.htm
(See Placenta, Fetus Circulation, Fetus Development, T. Peltonen, Mavis Gunther,
Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration, and Ode to My Placenta.
References of studies with comments is at:
www.lotusbirth.com/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
Home page:
www.lotusbirth.com
Originally Posted: April 4, 2004
