Misoprostol (Cytotec) for Cervical Ripening

Questionable drugs used in child birth: Misoprostol (Cytotex) for Cervical Ripening! ??? Prostin gel, Prepidil, and Cervidil, Pitocin, Syntocinon, Oxytocin, Demerol (morphine) are perceived to be poisoning maternity drugs to both the mother and the child. They have short term and long-term and for life complications. No amount is safe because of allergic reactions. There are over-whelming reports from personal experience of distraught mothers, of the dangers of these drugs commonly used by doctors, midwives, doulas, surgeons. Individual and class actions have been started with some. (By Donna Young, Natural Birth Education).

This Url for reference is: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-613.htm (Posted March 20, 2004)

Links on the maternity drug dangers by personal experience of these drugs are available. It is hoped the sharing will be discovered, by those approachable, long before the due date of any pregnant woman's needs to know. Links, in red, are below .

If you know a mother planning a family, or already pregnant, and she is approachable to be educated and warned, please share this site and a medical site, www.cordclamping.com That site is to try to re-educate doctors to be competently aware they must not clamp the pulsating cord, as they are wrongfully being presently trained, for political reasons. The political reasons are the selling of the baby's highly valuable placenta blood with stem cells and other nutrients of the blood sold to the highest bidders.

ARE "ALL" PREGNANT MOTHERS AND THEIR SPOUSES APPROACHABLE? No. MANY ARE NOT, REGRETTABLY:

It has been repeatedly experienced, that many mothers do not want their bubble of joy burst. Nor their spouses. Consequently, both the expecting mother and the father-to-be go naively into the hospital. The mother is approached to have a painless fast birth, this is for her to be actively managed. Up to that time, she was having a normal pregnancy and delivery. The active management view of painless means morphine. Morphine, such as Demerol simply slows down the labor, unnaturally. he medical team, involving nurses, who do not give the warnings of the drug manufacturer's knowledge of risk of their drugs used in pregnancy, then speed the labor up fast with oxytocin. Often this man-made drug, alleged to stop bleeding, but used in inductions, is mixed with morphine. Both these drugs distress the baby. It now has things in its skull to monitor its distress. They allow the baby to be distressed just shy of death. This distressing creates more stem cells in the baby's blood, which will be deprived the baby by early clamping. The baby will be taken to revival, the mother and father will be in a panic. The placenta will be drained from the mother, often while yet in the birth canal. She is none-the-wiser, in most instances, that is going on. The child, being revived, now with what was deprived, oxygen and volume and pressure of blood, may be impaired for life. If it is revived the parents are thanking those who jeopardized both mother and child, in the first place, by active management. The child, it will not die, in most instances.See Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law, Ontario Canada, handled by Roth and Sommers. The child will not die because in the hospitals they will repair the child, the best they can that the child will live. The only goal of the community hospital is to send home a living mother and child. This is not sending home a well mother or a well child, as would have been their situation had the mother being educated on Primal birth rights and Contract, and took a door stop to assure her privacy of birth in a warm water tub, and did catch her own undrugged baby.

The uneducated mother is seen to be actively managed by the helpless spouse. Their experience is not new. Many of the mothers, then, did not birth naturally, but were taken for c-section, and are expected to have c-section births, thereafter. This gives now 26 percent of the birth to the surgeon. The fees for actively managed births, are now about the same price, $20,000 for a vaginal birth, as to all the drugs used and the reviving of both mother and child.

These new parents have now joined the club of actively managed babies and mothers. They have learned in horror and by experience. And later, they get educated by this bad experience that they could have had a Birth Contract for natural birth primal birth, and no "clamping" of the cord need never have been done to their baby, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa. Their baby, then, would not have been harvested, which is logically, the motive behind active management in the first place.

Going into the hospital without a signed Birth Contract for Primal Natural Birth endangers the mother and the child. This is because the value of the placenta blood is so high, such as $30,000 for every couple of ounces, and the average take of the deprived baby's blood is 80 to 180 ml, means thousands of dollars deprived the team who may be sharing in the rewards of collecting that particular blood type, or the hospital's income derived if they are involved with the lab in such placenta blood collecting. The threat to the mother who is not protected with her spouse by a signed Birth Contract is injury to her own body and the child.

For example, I have on file a mother, from her own investigation and information supplied by her natural mother of what was done for her grandmother's ways of child birth, no clamping of the cord or cutting it, ever, and this mother-to-be became educated in Primal birth rights. This was not to clamp the cord, and to allow the placenta to be born and all pulsation to cease. This has been previously arranged to be done in the Langley Hospital, in British Columbia. Then, there just happened to be a serious birth accident of the medical team pushing the baby back into the mother's womb.

The baby is fine, and healthy. But the mother may never ever have a baby, again. Was this an intentional will as to deprived blood to the medical team, as European blood may be worth thousands of dollars as to Europeans exposed to the Russian radiation, and the radiation sickness still requiring transfusions of blood and antibiotics. This couple was of European background. By blood type and race they were vulnerable to anger if the blood type was prime, $30,000 per ounce of stem cells. The mothers are being exploited for political polices and training of medical doctors, nurses, surgeons, and ambulance medics, and doulas, today.

I have never heard of a baby being required to be pushed back into the womb for a face-up presentation. This new mother, inexperienced, had her womb mangled and infection set it. She almost died. She could not walk for months. She is not yet out of danger.

In another situation, recent February 2004 New Zealand birth, a new mother was alleged to have died because she was refusing to accept syntocinon. This drug is alleged by the drug companies needed for all births to stop bleeding. In most situations, the oxytocin is injected, full strength, into the mother, when the baby's head is born. Syntocinon, then, because it is Oxytocin, requires immediate umbilical cord clamping as to the drug alleged toxic to the baby's brain. That is directed by the World Health Organization. See W.H.O. at this web site.

The personal description of the events leading to the mother's death, if true, it is yet to be confirmed by Gary Evans the New Zealand Coroner, the description sounds to me, that the woman, against her will, was eventually drugged. It also by the description sounds like the baby was immediately cord clamped, and was struggling to live, drugged and low of nutrients, and in shock by low blood volume, being anemic.

The anesthetist, in a personal email letter to me, was insisting the mother bled to death by refusing to accept his offering of syntocinon. It sounds to me like she had been drugged, that her stomach was pushed down on, after early clamping of the cord, and that the cord was pulled on and there was likely an inversion of the womb. This would have cause bleeding that would not stop, in a normal birth and expelling of the placenta, the afterbirth. In that type of situation of aggressive and rough management of the woman's stomach and expelling the afterbirth by using strong muscle contracting drugs, oxytocin injected full strength, would have required an immediate operation to stop the bleeding. It would likely have been so serious requiring the removing of her womb, uterus. In doing so, she could not have babies, thereafter. Politically speaking, it would be cheaper for the woman to die, then for the millions of dollars paid in a civil suit, had she lived. The baby's well-being is not known, or if the story can be confirmed by Gary Evans, Coroner of New Zealand, for the Wellington area.

In two other similar situations, one in Ontario Canada, and another in Florida, the bogus excuse for clamping the infant's pulsating cord was the fear of the mother bleeding. This general does not happen until after the placenta is expelled, and they clamped the baby's flow of blood into his/her expanding lungs on a fear not present or truth the mother's life was in any danger. It was a bogus fear imposed on the mother to get consent, or not consent, to justify clamping off the infant's umbilical cord, and the likely motive was to eventually get the placenta and drain it of its contents for selling. In both situations, the nationality and race was European. In the case of the Florida female doctor, she pushed past the patients mother, a nurse, and clamped the cord before anyone could stop her. She was, as a professional, not going to be stopped in what she intended to do and her bogus reasons for that decision, that yet have yet to be addressed before a civil court, whenever the mother or the grandmother file the Writ to have a Discovery that there was an offense against the person, a helpless child and an uneducated mother, not able to protect her baby from the active management policies in that particular Florida hospital. In the Canadian situation, this was a homebirth, attended by three care givers two registered-nurse-midwives and a midwife student, that was licensed in December 2003. In both situations, the emptying out of the placenta were not confirmed or where the placentas were properly discarded for disposal...sold to others for hormones and enzymes, or burned.

MOTIVE FOR HASTY CLAMPING BY RACE, COLOR; ETHNIC MIX OF RACE:

Again, the exposure of radiation in Europe, is wide spread and stem cell blood from the Asian or European race is likely in high demand. This will be for a very long time. But the duty is to the child. Babies are not to be politically exploited. Babies have no duty to give up their blood, enzymes, stem cells hormones, and for the political reason of private increased conflict of interest of weakening these babes. The babies are not known to be in good health when they are being early clamped and weakened; they are not 110 pounds and not of legal age to give informed consent, age 17.

That the birthing mother was rushed for a fear decision, was not informed of reasons a doctor may decide to clamp the cord when the parents cannot have true informed means to stop their actions, imposed in alleged but non-factual visual reason, which means it was bogus to conceal motive and to try to avert criminal investigation of medical malpractice in an offense of endangering to a child, under ten years of age.

In these situations, the birth mother or the spouse could not protect them from assault, battery, and attempted murder and an offense to the person. They had no signed birth plan to force out the concealed intent of a doctor who may use a surprise element in the child's birth, with no evidence of fact to support hasty clamping, for a situation that could wait to see if bleeding was a need to take the baby off the cord for the benefit of the mother. And if a benefit to the mother if a fact of evidence was there, did she consent to risk the child, for her own sake, her choice not to risk the child, at the risk of herself?

The risk was visual of the offense to the child, that fact of evidence is the amount of blood that can be drained from the placenta, while yet in the mother's womb, or later if the placenta is birthed, at a risk of it being too full, and bigger then the baby's head to birth, the volume of blood being 4 to 6 ounces that ought to have been in the child, before the placenta was expelled. Visual evidence of fact is not opinion.

LEGAL GUARDIAN OF THE CHILD'S PLACENTA CAN BE AT THE BABY'S BIRTH:

That is evidence of the blood trapped in the placenta, if the parents are aware to have a guardian there of the child's placenta, can be told the judge on the average early clamped babies are deprived of 4 to 6 ounces of blood and are risked to being vulnerable to low immunities. Their low blood volume increases sickness if they are vaccinated with metals, such as the mercury preservatives in most vaccinations of Heb B, and likely also in the Vit. K vaccine.

That is endangering to now anemic babies are more so, if the mother is NOT educated not to vaccinate children that were early clamped. They are NOT checked for low blood volumes, and anemic conditions when public health nurses and doctors vaccinate them at birth, and every two months later, with many, many diseases, at one time, some up to six shots, at one time. See the Yurko Project.

Violence to women not being passive is known by men to do that to them, the attitude of some men ( and now some career women), is they cannot be inconvenienced in time, in finances, or sexually, that the woman or child doing that to them, may actually die.

Women in child birth, if they are not protected by their spouse, who are, in most instances, not informed what is going on, that their wife, spouse, the mother of the child is in danger of the community hospital's policies of active management. The active management consists of the drugging women and doing hasty clamping. , can have the violence not checked in the appropriate courts that have a power to be fact findings and investigate bogus medical practices and policies and those who allowed them to go on for so long.

The community hospitals are political, and more so, going private for profits. In doing so, their Ethic Boards, were not properly educated on the facts of the need of the baby to have all their placenta blood. That was their duty to know and be factually educated and by visual evidence of seeing how much blood is actually drained from immediate and early clamped babies. Videos for education are permitted for such education purposes.

What might be the motives of hospitals allowing high risk taking on any one baby in the community? It may be compensation for money's saved or income earning increased, by selling the placenta and the placenta blood deprived the owner/infant. The evidence of the amount of blood deprived the child, and not recorded on the child's medical chart, amounts to an obstruction of justice. It is amounts to also a cover up with collaboration of human organ and blood by most staff members (security of job political reasons) and their failure to make facts of entry of all care and treatment given a child's organ.

What normally goes without mention, by higher authority allowance of it to the community hospital, is the amount of blood trapped in the placenta. The placenta is drained, the placenta is put in storage coolers. Someone contracts to pick the organs up and if they are not factually burned, documented, they are being taken to drug companies, cosmetic companies and research facilities for stem cell research grants paid by the Province or State and the Federal levels of government.

SILENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL NURSES: (See their Nurses Manual, they do know right from wrong or ought to)

The nurses pretend they do not know who or where or for what purpose the placentas are being store. It their destiny to be burned, or to be used in science research? They ought to know. That is the secrecy going on at each community hospital, rural, and large city birth centers.

VIDEOS OF YOUR CHILD'S BIRTH AND THE TIMING OF THE CLAMPING OF THE CORD, IF AGREED TO - IT NEED NOT BE DONE, EVER:

There are, in most instances, no videos taken of the birth. Videoing of the child's birth is permitted at the request of the mother. If I could encourage all women, I would have videos not only in births, but in all operations, as a mandatory medical need to keep the standards high in all medical assistance in hospitals, today.

If any doctor cannot do or oversee a Primal Birth delivery, using no drugs, or allowing the birth to happen in warm water, we must ask, how well is he/or she trained? Or, if they cannot perform the assistance of any birth under a camera's eye, for a c-section, for a vaginal birth, or any other operation, why Not?

Primal births the mother is in control, to nourish herself, to move around and to birth in the position of her choice no forced supine position imposed on her by any woman or man. Such freedom to women is only going to come by their knowing primal birth rights, the tradition from the beginning of time. What is this primal birth and what is it not.

It is for the mothers to be assured they are not disturbed to be imposed on for active management births by having a signed Birth Contract. This puts the mother in control, as a woman in primal birth, not having a professional around, if she does not want that to be, but only her friends and no drugs but her freedoms of choice of movement and warm water births, to any drugs offered.

This being, then, the mother's birth experience, she dreams of and has a right to control, changing her mind at any time. Birth should not be badgering or threatening the mother to take a drug or examinations that our outside of primal birth. All state-of-the art technology, should be in written documented format given to the mother with the doctors training, particularly, any conflict of interest to clamp the cord and use the baby's placenta in the hospital or the baby's placenta blood elsewhere for another's cause and a conflict of interest of billings for collection of the baby's organ. This is an invasion of privacy of DNA and genetic codes in any one drop of blood or tissue or cell.

I believe, primal births, even in a rural hospital, or large city hospital will result in the return of the healthy blue ribbon baby, of which my living parents, ages 90, are living proof of unassisted births on the farm, no tying or cutting of the cord, for no infections getting into their blood lines.

ACTIVELY MANAGED BABIES ARE JAUNDICED BABIES:

Actively managed babies ALWAYS produce yellow-green babies with yellow-green whites of the eyes. Primal Birth babies are born, customarily bluish, true for all babies because of their fetal circulation yet to be changed to an adult circulation, after all placenta blood is in the infant's lungs. The primal birth babies (undrugged and not early cord clamped) are then become pinkish-white babies (not yellow-green) and the remain pinkish-white if Caucasian babies. For any colored babies, they have healthy skin and healthy eyes, that are not yellow-green, which is jaundice caused by drugs and early cord clamping.

The jaundice is an indication of liver damage by the drugs given the mother. The jaundice can also be evidence of iron overload, by the killing off too fast the baby's red cells, by the drugs and the early cord clamping. For that condition, hasty clamping, the baby has low white cells, and low red cells. This weakened baby, is documented in science research and medical clinical studies and policies to be known to take from 6 weeks to 6 months before new blood is recreated for the anemic condition not to be so noticeable. (See SOGC Policy #72, December 1998).

If the jaundice continues over two weeks, the doctor is likely going to recommend the baby be given more blood. This additional blood will not be the blood deprived the baby, at birth by early cord clamping. That blood was whole blood now separated in many components of blood, plasma, stem cells, enzymes, hormones, white cells, and so forth.

The blood was used by the hospital, or sold to the highest bidders for that baby's particular race or blood type. The community hospitals records of income and expense will reveal the truth of what happens to the baby's placenta and the foreskins taken by circumcision.

GETTING THE COMMUNITY RECORDS AND POLICIES BY FILING A WRIT IN THE CHILD'S NAME:

Only the Writ filed in the appropriate court, offense against the person, civil damages, and medical malpractice, (could be a conspiracy of those at the hospital, and at various levels of government including Colleges of Midwifery and Physicians and Surgeons) will bring legal rights to get information on the child's care and the mother's of course. The Writ allows for all billings records, and all lab reports, released. And information on what actually happened to the child's placenta and deprived blood, and how much was likely taken from this child, by the time the cord was clamped.

The Writ allows to Discover who, in the local community hospital was involved in the taking of the child's blood, and how much, and why was it tested for anything not given specific consent, if taken for testing. How much blood was needed for a blood type and/or any testing if given consent to test the child's blood.

The Accounting Department must reveal the codes for the Maternity and Labs expenses and incomes as to handing of the human organs, the placenta and the placenta blood. These accounting records ought to reveal the truth of the placenta and the placenta blood, and the discarding of them. And if ground up, if the blood was extracted into various components.

The Discovery can review discarding and disposal methods of the placenta and its contents. Is it legal to flush placenta down the drain, by grinding it up? Grinding up the placenta is more for centrifugal machinery to spin out the various components of blood for resale, such as plasma, and stem cells, hormones and enzymes.

And, if the baby was by ritual, circumcised, will the the truth be known, in each community, that the foreskins were not burned. But that the foreskin was billed for sending to burn skin tissue banks? This will be found true of the membranes of the placenta. This is without informed consent and revealed to others, are the DNA and Genetic codes of the families of this special child. Who knows how the privacy of genetic information may be used to target this child and /or his family at a future date?

What has been going on without informed consent at each community hospital? These are the secrets of the staff working at that hospital. The Writs are to be local for compensation for wrong-doing, by breach of trust, and an offense against the person. This can be in each community per baby. There may be class actions for two or more children violated by breach of trust, in each community.

AUTISTIC AND INTERNALLY DAMAGED BABIES LOOK NORMAL - YOU CAN'T TELL BY THEIR PHYSICAL APPEARANCE THEY HAVE BEEN IMPAIRED AND COMPROMISED -- THEIR NATURAL INCLINATION TO GENIUS ROBBED DENIED FOR FULLEST POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT:

The actively managed babies, both girls and boys, will be a physically looking normal looking baby. The damage, in most cases does not change any full term babies appearances. The babies, however, and they are all different to a roll of the dice, will be internally damaged babies. Some will be quiet and withdrawn as in shock. Others will be so active they cannot sleep.

The hospital and their medical team involved in active management will not be taking any responsibilities, until they have to. Only a court will make them have to do anything, release records, billings, and discarding of the placenta and the blood, and the policies and who directed them, in each community hospital, and who above the community hospital have a larger accountability and financial duty to the violation to the child, and breach of trust to the parents of the child.

Only by a Court of Law will breach of trust, in child birth, in each community, be corrected. Most community hospital had the mothers deceived to think that if they had to submit to sign appropriate care, in that the hospital. The hospital believed that forced signing of that form excused them to any accountability for what they then did as assumed policy of the nurse, of the doctor or the policy of the hospital in the treatment of the woman and her baby. The courts may see that differently, but the women have to take issue in a court of law. They must not remain silent any longer. The hospital, nurse, and doctor did assume, that by policy, they could do just anything with the mother's person and her child. NOT so. Appropriate care forms are only paper. They just mean a form was signed, and not that the mother gave informed consent to anything.

The babies looked normal after being drugged, but internal disorders are latent in discoveries, even the killed brain cells and damaged nervous system is hidden for weeks, and months, and learning disabilities for years, even until the child begins school. The proud parents of a living baby will not, in most instances,. ever see the pH tests, of an early clamped cord, of which they said it was policy to clamp the cord, while red, firm, and pulsating for a cord sample of the baby's blood. That means the baby, if the cord was red, firm, and pulsating was deprived of nutrients in the placenta blood. Most midwives and doulas were imposing on the mother to give consent to allow this by their lying saying it was a required policy and not telling the other of the danger to herself and/her child.

The danger to the mother, is known and logical, that the clamping on the umbilical cord, with a full placenta, means the placenta, was at risk of rupture if birthed full, and with harder contractions if oxytocin was given. The risk of the placenta rupturing meant two bloods mixing. The mother's future babies, would be jeopardized to being carried full term, or to be healthy. She would be subjected to further injections and reactions to those injections. This is all part of active management, the political reasons being more financial gain to the birth institutions and those managing the woman's birth. None of this is done in Primal births, the placenta is reduced normally by the continuous transfusion of the placenta-lung-blood-bag being gently transfused into the baby's now expanding lungs. That process can take different periods of time, that no standard of time can be directed by any clinical study to be a standard of care imposed on all women, and their babies, by any policy of active management.

The active management teams in most hospitals will attempt to conceal the truth of the child's care and treatment and the mothers. But this is a criminal violation if injury was to the mother or the child, by obstruction of justice if records were not done, correctly, and factually, or went missing. What the mothers must have from all births is all the Apgar Scores. For early clamped babies there will generally be two or more Apgar Scores. The hospital will attempt to only give the last revived score to the mother. What score will be filed on the child's registration and statics of birth, may never be seen or a copy given to her from the community hospital. The mother, unless she is forced to pay to get the complete birth registration information may never see what the government sees on that child's care, and what the system thought important to know about that child. Primal birth does not make such records if the baby is born unassisted in the home by none-professional persons. Unassisted means the mother is yet protected by a birth witness for a hands off birth birth by a signed Birth Contract for primal natural birth, no unncessary interventions.

The community hospital will have imposed on the medical staff, that are approved to work on their premises to void or not mention the timing of the clamping of the child's umbilical cord. Such information missing is the position of the child's birth when born, the time of the cord clamped and the condition of the cord when clamped, such as red, firm, and pulsating. The amount of blood drained from the placenta-lung-blood-bag will never ever be recorded on the child's own medical chart, and if the baby died, what happened in birth will often not be told by the nurses, or the policies of the hospital of what they did with the placenta or the placenta blood. It will never be mentioned in a civil court by most law firms, if the parents are not aware that is important to be told the Judge.

Accurate recording of any amputation of an organ is required in most College of Physicians and Surgeons duties to report facts of care and treatment and condition of the cord when clamped or amputated, and cause to be done so. On the timing of the clamping of the cord, this is not mentioned, in most instances, and this is true around the world. The medical teams doing this have said it was not important to "them" to have done so. Why not? It was important for the child, yet to experience learning and behavior problems in the future as to the care and the treatment. For the failure to keep the records and to give them to the mothers, the medical teams and groups making policies attempted to void out records of this nature, and led the public to believe, the increase in damaged children was an increase of genetic disorders and not caused by medical malpractice as I suggest and perceive in my website.

The parents, yet trusting blindly so in their community services just are not educated, and this is a fault of the control in most medical biology textbooks directing the care of the child's umbilical cord and promoting the drugging of women in active management, saying the drugs were safe if offered to the mother. After the child's birth, parents are not paying any attention, or their birth witness of the completion of the child's birth, the placenta, the baby's organ, and the contents of the blood, and where its next destiny will be -- the lab room, for what purpose and then where, for a fact, does it go...to be burned or invoiced out for profits of the components of blood and selling of the placenta membrane and the placenta ground up for nutrients, of enzymes and hormones, yet not able to be made by man.

These concerns are shared by Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother, Natural Birth Education I age 61 and I am one of many grandmothers, in birth education, trying to spare mothers of tomorrow from becoming the 5th generation of being medically deceived and unsupported of facts of truth, for healthy births, in their own communities. This was the fate of most grandmothers concerned of what is happening to the mothers and the babies, today.

We are trying to empower the mothers of tomorrow with facts of information that are visual and logical. We hope this information helps you to have, if you wish, an unmolested Primal Birth and natural birth, even in your own community hospital.

This right of traditional primal birth (natural birth, now called Lotus Birth) is for both the mother and her children or children, in the even of multiple births. Can multiple births be natural, and be born by primal birth traditions and rights of the woman? Yes, for example, the Dionne quintuplets, born near Callander, Ont., Canada, in 1934, were the first quintuplets known to live for more than a few hours after birth. They were born naturally, in their own farm home. They were all normal little girls, and it is believe two are yet surviving.

The birth of these 5-babies became a political management of their lives by the Ontario Government, they brought in revenues higher then sight seers to the Niagara falls. Active management is a political scam. It manages the mothers and exploits her baby to give up their placenta blood the baby needs for his/her own health and well being. This is happening in home births as well as in the institutional births in their own communities. This is if the mother is using a currently trained licensed medical person, trained in active management. The active management is political for financial profits. The higher the fees the more income in tax revenue. And the more the sick babies, of internal injuries the greater the repeat business. Governments and doctors and their associated fields, do not get rich on healthy babies, or the births that are primal, just requiring a rented room, if a mother feels the need for an institutional birth.

However, the actively managed women and their babies have increased the cost of the birth care, the drugged births going as high as $20,000 dollars for an vaginal birth. The amount of money spent does not assure the mother of a positive birth experience, nor a quality baby to raise. Most of the babies are damaged, one in sixteen, having to be revived. Mothers leave the hospital sick and with a sick baby, in most instances. This follows the mothers being actively managed, the leading policy approved by the community hospital - but they gave no real support in truth of education in Primal birth rights as a choice to the women of the community, the active managed policies promoted in their community selected biology textbooks paid for by the politics of the government, in whose book, is selected, the author and the publishers and contents. (See references for comments on current biology textbooks, previous nurses manuals, at

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Others mothers sharing their concerns and research, long before me, I began personal review on child birth starting in 1998. But many began back in the 1950's. Some came later, as to the writings and speeches of Doris Haire, now 79 years young. Doris Haire is too valuable to not to be allowed to retire from helping ladies to make informed choices. Please do Visit her site at www.aimsusa.org

I am voluntarily taking her and other's research one step further. I am advocating that if I were the mothers with a impaired child, living, to take the issue into the civil courts. It is here two sides of story can be heard and the facts found. This is a legal battle field with a winner and a loser. This is where the Judge can hear all sides of story and why a mother and her babies were drugged without true informed choice of the risks of the drugs and long known to endanger the mother and the child.

Such information by Doris Haire and others, I believe, should be used in a Court for Civil Writs filed in the name of violated babies. Following the civil action for compensation, I believe that the mothers, if I were them, and I have done this, must take the same information for criminal charges against their own person, by those involved in that community, hospital, nurse, doctor, College of Physicians and Surgeons for not stopping bogus policies from being practiced and without true informed consent. The hospitals not having true informed consent an organ was cosmetically removed to be sent to organ use and the blood used, and without informed consent. This threatened the family's privacy of how such information might be used against them, by race, color, sex, or age.

Many women, in pregnancy, nearing their delivery dates are so uneducated the manipulation skills of most medical persons trained in active management they do not see a lie coming at them. Or, pressure, that they are to comply or threat of reporting to "whatever" authorities a doctor is going to use to pressure a woman to submit to active management and deny her a Primal birth, natural birth, no hands on doc birth. The women must know they can have a Birth Contract to protect themselves and their babies from potential harm, which is another word for active management used by all local community hospitals. It is their policy.

Many women believe their cervic is made of cast-iron and without turning their cervix to mush, cervical ripening, they will not be able to have a normal birth experience. It is a lie. You do not have a cervix made of cast-iron. Nor do you have a pelvic bone with no hinges on them. The truth is natural hormones and enzymes, will be there when you and the baby are ready for the baby to be born, not sooner, and not in the busy financial time schedule of the doctor or medical staff in your local community. The hormones and enzymes, to name a few are Oxytocin (not the man-made junk, with chlorobutanol in it), and Relaxin, and Prolactin, and Serotonin. There are others these will begin your education of searching. Hormones in Childbirth, see what the internet has to offer.

DECEIVED WOMEN ARE STARTING TO FILE WRITS IN THEIR COMMUNITIES FOR VIOLATIONS DONE TO THEIR PERSONS AND THEIR BABIES IN CHILD BIRTH:

Mothers have to be better informed and the community they live in is letting them down, today, and in the past. Past deceived mothers are now starting to file a Writ in their child's name for breach of trust of lack of truth in doctors, midwives, surgeons, obstetricians and gynecologists manipulating them to apply "stuff" onto their bodies, their cervix, their amniotic sac stripped and applied directly "stuff" that absorbs into the mother's blood stream and into her baby's. Many of those babies who had that "stuff" get into their blood stream and into their brain are suffering with autism.

One such action, now taking place is in Ohio. the mother got tired of lawyers not sure what to do, in shock, so to speak. The mother was encouraged Get off the Pot or Do Something. This mother of an autistic child, then took action. This I would do and and say if I were any mother with an autistic of any internally impaired child, I would not accept bad genes. I would file a Writ in the Child's name for the child's financial needs and protection for compensation of wrongful medical policies and practices imposed on the child during and after birth and without informed consent of the mother. What mother, informed would allow her baby to be deprived up to 60 percent total blood volume, for the doctor, nurse, lab and hospital to have a political interest in selling the blood to another? The actions are in the community, where you live, where your baby was born. This then is the message, if I were the mother of an compromised child, in every community, rural to large cities, to attempt Getting off the Pot and Doing Something. Filing the Writ in the Child's Name is the first step. This assures the child the right for consideration of financial compensation for the child.

Most nations, the Federal government have baby budgets. In the United States there is an annual baby budget, for active management, perceived to be molesting the child, at birth, in most cases. The USA budget is for 4 million babies born each year is 20 Billion dollars. That is not a necessary budget if mothers revert to Primal birth rights, even in the hospital. The budget can be expected to be reduced to at least 90 percent. That budget saved can then by logically distributed, annually, hereafter, to all violated babies, yet living, many now adults, who had live made more difficult for them. There will be no more damaged babies by wrongful birth policies and practices. The ten percent can be for true need of c-section babies, which was before the 1920's, at about 3 to 5 percent of all births. The rest of the 10 percent budget, 5 percent can be for complicated vaginal births, needing some assistance, at the request of the mother. Ideally, this is getting back to the primal births, and blue ribbon babies of educated mothers who want primal natural births in the first place, and have not been adequately educated how to have them, which should, start in the home in such instructions, from knee high, teaching all placenta-birthing mammals want freedom to birth as they please, and leave the cord alone, unless it is torn or for placenta previa. Cord around the neck simply need a finger between the cord and the neck to prevent neck injury, the pulsation continues and the oxygenated blood continues to nourish the mammal, until the cord is long enough to unwind, safely, not cutting or clamping the cord, necessary.

In Canada, the first Laying of Information for perceived criminal medical assault involving active management are still pending in British Columbia, Canada and in Ontario. One complaint is for covered-up deaths of premature baby, who died in my own home town, Dawson Creek, BC, October 8, 2000. It was perceived the baby died because of early umbilical cord clamping. This would cause the baby not to live past 14-minutes. The baby would not have been allowed to have had adequate blood volume, for him to live. The child could be perceived to go into shock and die, which it did. The baby could have been investigated by a proper coroner's investigation to be found anemic after hasty clamping.

Motive if the baby was harvested and the placenta after death:

Babies who are premature are simply being harvested for the placenta blood because they have more stem cell blood then do full term babies. They are immediate and early clamped and deprived their full transfusion of blood, if they are under 5-pounds. The baby's blood was created for the baby, as it grew, it will not have too much for his/her own needs, to be determined by the child, which a human cannot guess at.

The doctors, from what I can see by research and discussions with others, are using bogus medical policies to their own discretion, in the timing of the clamping of the cord, and put that into opinion of policies they can make it a rule they follow, and not mention their intentions to the mother of the child, or the father.

The doctors have believed the timing of the clamping of the cord was at their own convenience. The hospital believed that was confidential self-governing of the doctor whether they informed their training or intentions on the patient that would be served in their hospital, when medical reports indicate what best practice is for all babies, leave the cord alone, unless the cord tore. Indirectly, the nurses silent on this issue and the best practice possible, allowed to be violated between the doctor and the mother as to the duty of care to the child, when the mother is not by fact of evidence in danger to cause the baby to be anemic, is a matter of law, as well, as an offense done to the child. The hospital stating it has not accountability as to what is done on its premises is also for a Court to decided of negligence in allowing early clamping for no good medical reason. This is particularly, if the hospital can be found to have allowed the use of the placenta and the blood for gain, of some nature, as to expenses saved in use of the blood in the experiments of the day, when the blood belonged inside the baby/owner of the blood.

ENDANGERING TO THE CHILD, AN OFFENSE TO THE PERSON:

By the community being silent on the intentions of care to any child's umbilical cord, the threat to the community is that some doctors and nurses are predetermining whose baby will be offered for a blood sacrifice to another's cause. The premature baby, because they have more stem cells then do full term babies, will be the ones to be subtly blood let. First by early clamping for more stem cells. The medical persons, the team, will determine by any perceived mental or physical disadvantage, whose baby shall live and whose baby is unfit to live. Or, the team will determine by age, race, color, social class, the quality of life a child might have n the community. All this can be controlled by the secrets of concealed intent of the timing of the clamping of the cord. This is the intent of the community hospital to allow this secret intent to be the doctor's decision written in policies it is their discretion and however they may deceive the mother of the child and the father by bogus and false policies now in existence, and knowingly harmful and a threat to any child whose doctor clamps a pulsating cord, other then for the reason the cord tore or for placenta previa. Can a doctor agree with the natural parent to impose an offense to the child to be treated as a second class citizen and blood-deprived to store the blood where it can be later sold, secretly, to the highest bidder by the guardian of the child. Or, submitted by donation and a collection fee by the hospital or the doctor.

Sometimes the blood collection fee (paid for by codes by grants, by medical insurance plans) are for a specific blood type, for example Russian, European, Asian, ancestry or mixed-race blood. The fees, stated paid by Australia for example, was $30,000 for a few ounces of stem cell blood. This nation now blood-lets their own newborn babies, and the motive is political, moving across the world, making each community hospital unsafe for births of any child.

That is how important stem cells are on the open market. The governments at the Federal level did not protect the babies in each community, and in fact, allowed their own political policy makers to exploit the newborn living child to be early clamped, and allowed their own radio and tv stations NOT to warn the public how much blood was being deprived most babies, 20 to 60 percent total blood volume. This is visual evidence of the amount of blood drained from each early clamped child, from premature to full term babies, whether by a c-section birth or by a vaginal birth.

The threat of early cord clamping, political in profits, then, puts a child at risk in any community hospital. The community hospital, by their own Ethics Committees, many governed by ministers of the justice system, lawyers, were then keeping secret from the members of the community what they permitted to go on in their delivery rooms, and the secrets kept by the nursing staff, who failed to do unbiased reports on the doctors and the timing of the clamping of the cord, written as fact in the child's own medical charts. This was the policy of the Provincial, State and Territories of each country/Nation. This was the policy kept secret of what is best practice possible and least risk of harm. That is visually seen, not by opinion, but facts seen, to be full delayed umbilical cord clamping. Motives to the contrary are for the baby's blood, whether to weaken the baby by burning the blood, or weaken the baby to harvest the baby's blood for another's cause.

Again, think about it: The child can be risked at any community hospital for collaboration of secrets of the timing of the clamping of the child's umbilical cord, the quality of life-line, by race, by color, by sex, or by social status of the family, known in the community.

On determining by physical condition of the child, some babies, by the present thinking of some medical persons is that babies born under 5-pounds will not contribute to society. They are then vulnerable to be put down by the timing of the clamping of the cord, or harvest until they die. The early clamping, at birth, whether c-section or vaginal is intended to take the baby's blood and use it, thus depriving the compromised baby of essential of life, blood and oxygen. The mother would not know her baby was more weakened, assuming the doctor was covered-that the baby was premature...so not expected to be well, added compounded problems by early clamping.

Contrary that babies under 5-pounds are only valued for harvesting of placenta stem cell blood and organs, there is a baby alive and well, in the city of Fort St. John, BC. This baby, while suspected of the early clamping fate, was born at about 6-months premature birth, March 2002. The baby boy, born in the Royal Alexander Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, was merely 1 1/2 pounds. The child, by the choice of the natural mother, and at her own expense, was given supplements at birth, of a natural sugar, Ambrotose. The baby's system needs sugar. And her natural breast milk provided 5-natural sugars the brain needs. This supplement added another 3 more natural sugars. Ambrotose has eight natural sugars. It is like a battery that starts all cells communicating with each other.

This premature baby thrived. This baby was the only one to survive early clamping and blood-letting every 2nd and 3rd day, a ritual at many hospitals testing premature babies blood. The amount of blood the ritual collecting was from 10 to 15 percent blood, every other day. Some doctors alleged they do not know this is going on. Then is that the Administration of the hospital's allowance of a private lab to be doing the collecting and the extra billing, increasing costs to the tax payers? In this case, this baby was the only one to live of the premature babies, or so I am advised. The baby's holes in the heart sealed (a cause by early clamping), and he is developing without any indication he will be mentally or physically handicapped. (To see the baby at birth and months later, go to www.123-baby-birth.com Look for the first "sugar" in the Table of Contents.

Currently, community health care workers are setting aside equal protection and security of persons by their own policies and apparently are controlling the police from failing to uphold the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, of enforcement of the criminal codes, which do not exempt investigation of doctors, nurses, or midwives for wrongful deaths by failing to provide the essentials of life. Adequate blood volume, cut off by early clamping causes anemic disorders in a child. It is no difference to drain a baby of 60 percent total blood volume, by sitting the child on your lap and opening a vein and draining the blood, then it is to clamp off the placenta-lung-blood-bag, and deprive the child of the placenta blood volume and pressure. No difference at all.

The police seem to fear the medical personnel in their own areas, but they took on a duty not to fear for their own life, when they have a duty to look after those endangered by others in the community and by organization and outside of the Criminal code. The policies of the medical groups are bogus, used as alibis and are seen as outside of visual evidence of harm to the child. The evidence is in the fact of the placenta, which can be drained to show the amount of blood deprived a child, when clamped before the completion of the birth, the placenta born, and all pulsation has ceased. Active management is a bogus policy when it directs immediate cord clamping as a standard of care on all babies. Only if the cord tore or for placenta previa, might a cord be clamped. Immediate correction of giving back the child oxygenated blood in volume for it to live, and pressure, is required and a duty to the child, immediately, to prevent serious consequences. See Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law, Sommers and Roth, Ontario, Canada

The coroners in the community, generally, small rural communities are picked to be not doctors and therefore do not know to investigate the amount of blood yet trapped in the placenta. They do not investigate the baby died of a wrongful death and a trial should be heard to correct false reasons of medical allowance of early umbilical cord clamping, and the motive connected to political allowance of harvesting babies for their particular type of blood, by race, color, nationality, and even by sex.

The City Police and RCMP are just dumb-founded. They are not enforcing their duty of equal protection and security of person by their Nation's laws. The police, male and female, are, apparently, confused as to medical policies. They are not sure if the doctors and their medical societies can make a law to deny others their National Rights and due process of law, of what is or is not done to their persons or their babies. The parents being the natural guardian of the child, as to care and treatment, not the State, at least not before a hearing.

The City Policy and RCMP, are not competently trained, at least on this issue, if medical persons can or ought to be taken away informed choice of the women to be in control of her own body. Or, what is or is not done to her baby, for their best interest, is her right or if she must submit to hospital's appropriate care program of active management? Active Management is political for profits. It includes the drugs of induction, and used during and after the child's birth.

Of course, the police are not doctors, but they think criminal investigation is done by the Colleges of Physicians, Surgeons and Midwives. Not so. Police investigate allegations of no informed consent to the touching or drugging of the mother's body to give birth. They just have never heard of mother's complaining, 39 years, later, and wanting their doctor before a Judge, if alive.

If I were any mother of an autistic child, I would be filing a Writ in the Child's name, for violence done to the child and medical malpractice. Getting the action started by a Writ being filed in the child's name, and all medical reports made available by Discoveries of such documents and full billing of the child's birth, I, would if I were the mother of the child, file criminal charges as well. This is because anything done to another's body, without true informed consent of the risks is assault, battery, attempted murder, common nuisance and an offense against the person.

These are some links mothers can gain strength they were deceived in their own community hospitals and from their own prenatal courses, they paid to hear the truth to make informed decisions, and to have been told the truth in tax-paid biology textbooks, that failed to mention rights of the mother to have a primal birth experience, no hands on birth, no drugs, no cutting of her body, and that it was not a medical need to clamp or cut the baby's umbilical cord ever.

The babies now suffering with internal disorders, from autism to holes in the heart all have active management as the probable cause, involving: drugs during labor, prone (flat on the back) or supine (semi-sitting birth positions), cutting of the woman's body (allows virus to get into the mother's and the baby's blood stream). The cutting is either an episiotomy or a c-section, and sometimes, both.

The cutting is followed with instruments (they themselves can spread a virus or toxin by the cleaning solutions of mercury), to pull the baby from the womb, forceps or vacuums. Then the baby is further assaulted, battered and endangered of life or quality of life by immediate cord clamping. Being now anemic the baby is given oxygen and sometimes blood expanders, by being deprived 20 to 60 percent total blood volume. The baby is then risked of further infections by needles of injections of Vit. K and a STD injection of Hep. B, these too having mercury "stuff" in them, and it is not known if the metals were radioactive. This is now suspected, at least by the author. This is because many of the babies with autism have similar gut disorders to those with radiation sickness.

Every College of Physicians and Surgeons, every medical association, society, every Midwife College, every Medical Training Center all had a duty to uphold the Nation's laws of true informed consent, and no harm done. I have not seen this evidence for now going on the 5th generation of women birthing babies in Canada of the United States. See why: Witches, Midwives and Nurses, a small pamphlet available in most women's studies at your local university or college. It was written in the 1970's.

Damaged children by drugs followed by early clamping were suspected back in the 1950's. One of the best graphic research papers was done by Dr. Mavis Gunther, UK, 1957. The educators suspected birth injuries with the publication of The Magical Child , 1970's, and the research mentioned was from the 1960's. Educator and author is Joseph Chilton Pearce.

Violence and injustice to the weakened child, most do not die, was known and written and advocated against early clamping by Dr. Erasmus Darwin 1801

C-section babies removed intact, no clamping or cutting of their umbilical cord. The fact that all babies can be not clamped or cut of their cord, ever, even C-section, was written and published by T. Peltonen, 1981 .

Please check the Internet or this web site for more information use the Table of Contents at www.lotusbirth.com A doctor trying to educate the doctors of today, to be ethical, moral and competent, can be found at www.cordclamping.com

Protocol: Misoprostol (Cytotex) for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor by Myer S. Bornstein, M.D. and Don Shuwarger, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., OGBYN.net Editorial advisors (see http:/www.obgyn.net/english/ob/MisoporostolProtocol.htm) below for the full article.

To quote them: "Misoprostol (Cytotec)_ is a synthetic PGE1 analogue. It's FDA approved indication is for the prevention of stomach ulcers in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Because of its prostaglantin activity it is also very useful for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Misoprostol has much the same mechanism of action, benefits, complications, indications, adverse reactions and contraindications as other cervical/vaginal prostaglandin products (e.g. Prostin gel, Prepidil , and Cervidil ). Multiple studies have been done in multiple U.S., Canadian and European centers all showing the effectiveness and safety of Misoprostol for cervial ripening and induction of labor."

In comment of their position of a clinical study, comparing one drug product to another, I have found this is true in most clinical studies that are then inferring a standard of care by all those reading their report. Never is their a true study of healthy births by Primal births, of no drugs and healthy births and no unnatural bleeding of the mother if not drugged, or cut. Often if there is bleeding the reports are not indicating if the mother was testing for anemic conditions prior to birth, or was sick, such as having a diabetic condition, or other sickness.

Often there is no warning to the mother by the medical person reading this political clinical study, supporting the use of drugs of the risk of allergic reactions, or turning the mothers cervic into mush, or brain damaging the child by the drug going directly to the baby's brain, once in the placenta. Political means the medical staff and the hospital are trying for the best financial interest and time convenience. The drugs used in active management are rushing the baby's birth for the schedule of a busy hospital, doctor or staff. They have set a time limit of the mother laboring for 12-hours on their premises. To that, women should be educated not to enter the hospital, in early labor, but to labor at home, knowing how to prepare for an easy primal emergency birth.

This is simple: birth in the warmest and cleanest room possible. That room may be the bathroom and in the warm tub, filled with water. Move around as much as possible, try squatting, on your side, forward sitting. Have warmed towels to wrap the baby after it is born. Merely, gently wipe its nose and face with a clean cloth. Do not gag the baby with suction tubes, it can cause it a heart attach. Do not clamp or tie off the cord. That is not necessary, unless the cord tore. If the baby is born in a nice warm tub, take the baby's face immediately out of the water. He/she is not a fish and the placenta may not be getting oxygen any more from the mother's body, if pulled away).

After the placenta is birthed, which can for a normal birth, be 3 to 5 minutes, sometimes longer as much as 20 minutes, but that is more for an early clamped cord, keep the placenta close to the baby. If the mother is now out of the warm tub, keep mother and child warm. Wrap the baby in a warm towel, and the placenta in a warm towel, kept close to the baby. It need not be tied or clamped or cut from the cord. To do so is to risk cord infection. They baby can get that infection and die, even in the hospital, so leave the cord alone and the placenta. Nurse your baby. If mother does bleed, which is normal, after the afterbirth is expelled, and 4-cups is normal, use a clean cold compression. If concerned, then go to the hospital, if necessary. Warm teas before birth, such as Red Raspberry have been used in Primal births, taken hot and strong for when labor is steady.

Other herbal teas are alleged good to prevent excess bleeding. The mother should know of her blood condition and if she is anemic during pregnancy. It is wise to have the monthly check up visits with the doctor, but do not let him or her force you into active management political financial policies of scans, x-rays, probing, as most will damage the baby, and cause internal damage you will never know damaged your babies cells.

BABIES WITH DEFECTS OR BEING REVIVED:

There are 1 in 16 babies being damaged and it is believed modern technology is the cause of many of them. Many babies are being scanned, at least once, and this cannot be pressured on the mother to do so. Suspect higher fees to the doctor as political, they are liars as being so sweet to state they are so concerned. Tests that invade the baby's space are to be suspect. The babies who are aborted are taken for stem cell research and all their organs, are used to do speciality organ cell development. This is done without informed consent, or knowledge, when the labs abort babies. They abort them whole using oxytocin.

If the babies are scanned, and later found with a defect, minor to serious, they are not being monitored, for new mothers to know the safety of state-of-the-art technology. But if your great grandmother were alive today, intuitively she would advise against the modern state of the art that invade the baby's home. Our mothers accepted natural primal births and had blue ribbon babies, unless contamination damaged their baby. Our ancestors accepted their babies unconditionally, boy or girl, without interventions to peek at the baby, and invade its womb. Of course, it is the mother's choice to use modern technology and to abort her baby, but the tests are not assured they are accurate, so she may well abort the baby that is perfect and it goes into the stem cell development cause and those facts not shared to the mother, as to how her baby was "appropriately" discarded, or disposed as to the community's policies.

Most invasions of the baby cause the internal damages and minor to serious birth defects. The active management medical workers, who directed this test or that test, when the baby is born with slight defect or serious, do not compensate financially for the defected baby. That becomes the parents liability for following suggestions made by a any person, including this message, to you, that you are reading. As you read this, you are making up your own mind, or should be, for what you will do for your baby or babies - go state of the art, go active management, or go primal which is natural.

If you do go primal and Lotus birth, and leave the placenta and cord as a biological reciprocal sealed-unit, remember to keep the placenta well aired as much as possible. Put it in a diaper if relatives see the child, but I'd keep visitors away until the placenta and cord are off the baby. This gives the mother and father bonding rights to their baby or babies. Do Keep the cat away. Have trust for primal birth. The placenta "will fall off" in a day or two's time. There will be no cord infections. NO hernias, as it not tied or clamped. The baby will be a blue ribbon baby, as he/she got all her blood by no clamping and tying off the cord. Do read for encouragement of the Lotus birth, Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration of Lotus Birth this web site.

Do you remember that by going primal birth, even in a hospital, is your legal right. No doctor or nurse, or hospital can pressure you for them to take the baby's organ and secretly dispose of it their way. That has to be heard in a court of law, they cannot make any policy to take your right of due process in a Court of Law. They cannot, legally upset a mother's right of Primal birth, in the home or in a hospital, by a Signed Birth Contract and a waiver to the hospital. The hospitals are receiving waivers for the ill-informed mothers directing their baby's be early clamped and their baby's 20 to 60 percent total blood volume stored. The doctors and hospitals doing this without reporting the threat to the child to the police and intend to participate in that endangering are only doing that because they have been robbing babies of their placenta blood, likely, in secret since the typing of the blood, that began back in 1901. The internal debate of early clamping and not to do it ethically and for the benefit of the child has being going on since 1801.

You will be spoiling someone's financial day, the politics behind early clamping. The medical system, including your community, rural to large city hospitals, were secretly seeking your baby's placenta blood type and blood line to be sold on the open market. YOUR baby had no duty to supply blood to the sick, they did not cause to be sick and had no duty to be the innocent provider and sacrificer of their blood to another's cause. If hasty clamping was imposed on your baby you have a right to file a Writ in the community's Supreme Court for violation and breach of trust to your child and the duty of informed choice not to have done that by the legal guardian of the child the two natural parents.

When time efficiency for birth is the protocol at most hospitals, women ought to birth at home, unassisted accept for their own trusted and best friend. See Laura Shanley's unassisted birth. Laura Shanley's perception, she shared personally with me, was similar to male chair person at my own local community hospital, in Dawson Creek, BC, George Caisley. He said that "If women were being injured, during birth and their babies, it was "all" their own fault.

NOT so, I say. I say that it is the duty of having informed choice and correct and truthful information. This I perceive is a duty in the community and at all levels of the community who I perceived to be sharing equal vicarious liability to provide the facts and risks in any child's birth. The information, lacking in most communities are bogus or false or withheld or misleading information on child birth.

These books in the community were purchased by tax-payer's dollars in the public school system, and in the public libraries and at the universities. All school districts can choose and their universities or colleges in their area, the information in the textbooks and can write the publishers and the authors they patronize including encyclopedias to remove bias information on the reproduction of the women or the birth of the child, by having correct logical information that is seen in nature, and in other primal births.

PRIMAL BIRTH PROTECTION TO ALL MAMMALS : No clamping of the cord is ever necessary for any placenta-birthing-creatures birth, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa. To direct the human baby's cord clamped when it is still pulsating is deleterious and endangering information that the author and the publishers ought to be made accountable, and the community purchasing that content of wrongful information. NO information is as bad as corrupted and biased information towards the human baby and the mother's care.

Links, they may or may not be still active. Go to the root web site if they are not active which ends at net, com, org, whatever:

http:/www.obgyn.net/english/ob/MisoprostolProtocol.htm

http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/07/11/cytotex/index3.html

http://www.babyzone.com/drnathan/P/Pitocin.htm

http://gurlpages.com/midwife2b/PitocinEpidemic.html

http://demOnmac.mgh.harvard.edu/forum/AutismF/6.15.982.19AMThinktwiceaboutPi

http://demOnmac.mgh.harvard.edu/forum/AutismF/Ihadpitocintoo.html

Demerol: A morphine, causes sleepy babies and slows down labor by 3 hours. This is manipulation for a doctor to deliver another baby elsewhere or to have a full day at the office. Babies are internally damaged but look normal, as is the case of all drugged babies, regardless of the gas, pill, or injection used.

http://midwiferytoday.com/articles/drugsinlabor.htm

If you would like to be an intervener to protect the Canadian Babies, and get the message across to other Nations, please link to:

Petition: www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

_____________________________________________________

Reference to back up the opinions of the author and statements alleged: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

The Table of Contents give diagrams of the fetal birth changing into the neonate/adult circulation system. Many nurses are not educate on this that go into the delivery room, which may explain why they did not give a fault report of doctors clamping the pulsating cord for any reason other then the cord tore or for placenta previa and not with true prior consent no clamping of the cord is needed to be done for a medical reason, it is merely cosmetic with threat of cord infections if done in the hospital of life threatening super bugs, that can be on the instrument, or in the air or on the clothing of medical aids in the birth room or the nursery. It is wiser, if the cord is to be amputated for cosmetic reasons for the parents to purchase a new clamping and cutting tool and do this at home. Sick babies can be operated on with their placentas yet intact. See Miracle Baby.

Comments or questions can be forwarded to the author, Donna Young at dyoung@pris.ca

________________________________

Protect Babies and Mothers Too Petition : www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

(1) References: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm (Listed are just some of the books studied are listed. It is a start of information known for a very long time).

(2) Home Page : Table of Contents : www.lotusbirth.com

Contact DONNA, MOTHER AND GRANDMOTHER: dyoung@pris.ca