bullet1 Mercury and Babies Don't Mix.

    Mercury, Babies, and Active Management Don't Mix: The governments in all nations have known the dangers of mercury and the most poisonous is methyl mercury. The first evidence of use of mercury begins with active management policies. Mercury, in vaccinations is imposed in child birth, on most babies, and this is world wide.   By Donna Young, Natural Birth Education.

This Url:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-612.htm

Revised March 20, 2004


    The mercury, that can get inside our bodies, can be in vapor, solid, or liquid form. The mercury particles may be highly toxic and, over time, may be causing as equal harm as is observed in the victims who were knowingly exposed to radiation. Some mercury that is put into our food products or medical drugs and vaccinations, may, for all we know, be radioactive.  Here is a quotation on organic mercury:

    
 Methylmercury may be formed in water and soil by small organisms called bacteria.
Methylmercury builds up in the tissues of fish. Larger and older fish tend
to have the highest levels of mercury.

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts46.html#bookmark02


Mercury poisoning is treated with blood transfusions and antibiotics.


    Governments have known that radioactive stuff was put in metals that we put on our bodies, such as in watches, even very top of the line watches, and in jewelry. Some radioactive gold was put in teeth as cheap fillings.  They were no bargain.  We thought we were allergic to metals...well, maybe so, radioactive metals.  Testing is easily done for radiation.  I ask, why isn't radiation testing for contamination in soil products and any human consumption product done more.  I suggest, that it may be wiser to own a Geiger counter then a gun, for our protection, in this polluted and crooked controlled corporation world of ours.


    MERCURY IS THE GOD OF COMMERCE:

    The mythical messenger of the gods was called Mercury. Mercury carried a winged staff. The Greeks called the staff a kerykeion, from the Greek word for messenger. In Latin, the language of the Romans, the word was changed to caduceus. Mercury's caduceus had snakes curled around it to protect him on this travels.  In ancient times, most messengers and travelers wore a hat similar to Mercury's petasus. Messengers also carried a staff to identify themselves so they could travel without interference.  Mercury later became associated with magic and science, and his caduceus has come to symbolize medicine.


     Criminals regard Mercury as their protector  (governments who get legalized kick-backs in commerce with higher tax revenues).  The ancient Romans also worshiped Mercury as the god of commerce, property, and wealth. Those that manage mercury well, certainly, get that wealth, don't they. The rich get richer in shares, like in government controlled vaccinations and a cornered market of 4 million babies born, for example in the USA, alone.  The governments also control and their corporations in the use of mercury in many other medical products and food products, that may have this metal, unknowingly, targeting the public, at large

    Reference on Mercury:  Paul Pascal, World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. M., p 341, 1979.


    About the Planet, Mercury, this link says it best:   http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0215468/mercury.htm?tqskip1=1

    What is know about the planet mercury is its speed, the name for the Roman Messenger, Mercury.  It has little protect from objects hitting it, as to its thin atmosphere.  Earth's atmosphere is very thick and objects burn up entering our planet's protective shield.  Mercury's atmosphere is mostly sodium and humans could not live breathing sodium gas.  Other facts of interest the planet has little oxygen. We, mammal, humans could not live there for these reasons, to quote, Think Quest, " They require both oxygen and nitrogen to survive. Although the atmosphere on Mercury contains a small amount of oxygen, without the presence of nitrogen, human life cannot exist. Nitrogen contains amino acids, which are the building blocks of protein. Without protein, a human body cannot repair itself, grow, move, reproduce, digest, and age."


    Mercury (Hg):     This Link ( http://www.seismo.berkeley.edu/~jill/hg.html  )  tells more about the element Mercury and how it can be used as poison:

  •     "The chemical element mercury is a shiny metallic liquid. Its chemical symbol, Hg, is derived from the Greek word hydrargyrum, meaning "liquid silver," or "quick silver." Although now obsolete, the word quicksilver has long been used as a synonym for mercury. The element shares group IIB of the periodic table with zinc and cadmium. The atomic number of mercury is 80; its atomic weight is 200.59. Mercury is very heavy, weighing 13.6 times as much as an equal volume of water. Stone, iron, and even lead can float on its surface."

  •     "Mercurochrome is an organic mercury compound that is used on wounds as an antibacterial agent. There are two types of mercury poisoning, acute and chronic. Acute mercury poisoning results from the ingestion of soluble mercury salts, which violently corrode skin and mucous membranes . Although cases have occurred in which persons have ingested elemental mercury without suffering permanent damage, mercury vapor aspirated into the lungs can cause severe pneumonia and death.

  •     "Chronic mercury poisoning occurs through the regular absorption of small amounts of mercury. This condition is often a disease of workers in mercury mines, laboratories, and industries that use mercury.

  •     "The most toxic mercury compounds are those that are fat soluble,  because this property assists in their distribution throughout the body.

  •     "Methyl mercury compounds, such as dimethyl mercury, are among the most dangerous.

  •     "Mercury salts released into the environment may frequently be converted by anaerobic bacteria into such compounds, which can then be carried through the food chain to humans as in the disaster at Minamata Bay, Japan

  •     "Other micro organisms can convert methyl mercury compounds into the insoluble, and therefore harmless, mercury sulfide."

    (Emphasis are Donna Young's).


AVOIDING MERCURY POISONING TO THE PEOPLE - IS THE DUTY OF THE GOVERNMENT, AT ALL LEVELS, OR OUGHT TO BE:

PROTECTION TO ALL, EQUALLY, REGARDLESS OF AGE, SEX, COLOR, RACE, RELIGION, MARITAL OR SOCIAL STATUS, OR MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISADVANTAGES:


     We must have more concern by all of us to care for our environment and in vaccinations guarding our babies to the elderly.  We have no babies to spare.  We have no person in our community to be exploited by the system. No one should be allowed to fall through the cracks of any society. We should care if the world is fair, it ought to be so. We ought to help to make the world a better place, not harm a soul. We have not one drop of blood to spare that is taken without informed consent, to whom and how it may be used.  Placenta and the placenta blood was taken and not discarded by burning. It was taken and sent to others and privacy of DNA and genetic codes given to others without the legal guardian of that organ and tissues given consent.  Those persons have had their trust breached.


  Those vaccinated with metals have had their trust breached as to the truth of the ingredients of the vaccinations and their side effects. They were not advised of any known harm and build up of toxins. Or, how  metals in any vaccination may  react once inside the body with other cells and the electromagnetic filed of all cells (atoms protons and neutron being positive and the electron, being negative), and the brain and the nervous system. How do the metals change the pH system, too? (See pH this web site).


     To quote a reliable World Book Encyclopedia on the known dangers of mercury:

     "The most dangerous mercury compounds are those containing methyl mercury.   They can damage brain cells.   In the mid-1950's, more than 100 Japanese were poisoned by fish that contained large amounts of methyl mercury.  The mercury came from industrial waste that had been dumped into the bay  where the fish were caught. In the early 1970's, some tuna and swordfish sold in U.S. stores were found to contain dangerous amounts of mercury.  The government recalled the fish from the stores and warned the public." (1) Stanley Kirschner, World Book, Vol. M, page 338, 1979.


Medical Use of Mercury:

    "Several organic mercuric compounds have important medical uses. For example, some medicines called diuretics, which physicians use to treat kidney disease, contain these compounds. The antiseptic Mercurochrome is also a mercuric compound." (2) ibid.


    Mercury in the Environment is hazardous chiefly because its poisonous compounds have been found in plants and animals that people use for food. Scientists have discovered poisonous mercury compounds in such foods as eggs, fish, grain, and meat." (3) ibid.


    Governments Working to Keep Mercury Out of The Environment. In the early 1970's, the U.S. and Canadian governments began to prohibit industries from dumping wastes containing mercury.  Much Mercury has been put into the environment in other ways.   Mercury compounds were once used to prevent fungi from growing  in lumber, paint, paper, and seeds, and to kill plant fungus diseases .  Shipbuilders used paint containing mercury to prevent marine animals and plants from growing on the hulls of ships.   In 1972, the U.S. government halted the use of mercury compounds for most of these purposes.


    Mercurochrome is the trade name for a weak antiseptic that is used in a water solution. The official name is merbromin.  Mercurochrome is one of a group of antiseptics called organic mercurials that contain mercury.  Mercurochrome is a coarse, green powder, but in a water solution it is a deep red. Mercurochrome's chemical formula is C20H8 O6Na2Br2Hg.  Mercurochrome solutions normally do not burn or irritate when applied to wounds. See also Antiseptic.  (4) Ibid, page 337

_______________________


Question:  Knowing the toxic characteristics of mercury, do you think mercury should have been allowed to be used in vaccination and used on children at the time of birth, then vaccinated in many vaccinations, every 2 months of age, until the child was 15 months of age, then onward?


     Concern:  Many of the children were already with low immunity systems, and had fast paced hearts by low blood volume and pressure, caused at birth, by doctors doing immediate and 30-second umbilical cord clamping.  The baby's placenta blood was being taken, without informed consent , at most community hospitals, and sold to the highest bidders,  the placenta membrane sold to skin tissue banks. The placenta blood extracted for valuable hormones and enzymes.  


    These babies, even before early clamping, had been compromised by drugs offered the mother, promising her a painless and fast birth. The offerings were of morphine (Demerol), and then followed with mixtures of morphine and oxytocin. The mother was encouraged to birth in a semi-sitting birth position or on her back. Either of these positions distressed the child in the birth canal, now closed by up to 30 percent.  


    The known harmful birth position (since 1913) caused further distress to the child. A distressed child releases more stem cells that are then trapped in an early clamped off cord and in the placenta.  Doctors may know this.  The risks of virus invasions would follow harmful birth positions by the cutting the mother's body to pull the child from her womb. Cutting is done by either a c-section or doing an episiotomy. Forceps and vacuum injure the baby's tiny brain vessels, or skull, or ribs, if midforceps are used. Sometimes, the midforceps clamped off the umbilical cord's circulation. See the  Ing-case-law,   by Sommers and Roth, Ontario Canada.  It is available in Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com  with comments, or no comments at: www.cordclamping.com


    The drugs, such as oxytocin, cross the placenta. Heavy, hard,  long and close together contractions cause the baby to have low oxygen content. The early clamping deprived the baby of the placenta blood, even if the blood was drugged. The mother had no options given her for no drugs and no clamping.


      The baby was then subjected to an artificial means of blood clotting, by injection of Vit. K, with unknown preservatives in it. This is then followed by Heb B vaccinations, with same mercury and other ingredients unknown injected. This is routine care imposed on the child. All this has been done, in most community hospitals and without true informed consent or right to a primal birth, that nothing of these interventions are imposed on the child. Primal and natural birth would leave out active management, knowing that natural birth is more logical and upheld in unwritten birth rights for the mother and her child.

    

     Following these medical rituals of care, often found in clinical studies that have conflict of interest to the medical system, some children, usually the boys, were circumcised. Today, that is regarded as a cosmetic procedure, not a medical need.  Most parents must pay that themselves.  


    It would seem that circumcised boys, then, would lead in more boys having autism then girls, who are not generally circumcised. But some religions require that mutilation to be done to girls, too.  Circumcision is only done for medical reasons. Those parents yet doing this are not yet educated of the harm and risks, some babies have even died.  For others, their quality of life was changed, and not for the better.


    Autism, and the increase of it, is multi-factored to the active management policies imposed during and after the child's birth.  There is more then one unnecessary  invasive care imposed on the mother or the child, if not on both.  Any one imposing medical practice, not done with true informed consent and right to refuse the care as to any known risk of harm to the mother or the child, is subject to a hearing for compensation.  This would be for the rights of both mother and the child.  It is medical malpractice, in my views and a study of active management reveals that most communities are involved of imposing such rituals on the populations.


    Question:  Do you think individual parents now aware that assault and battery and attempted murder was imposed on the mother and the child, should be taking community civil actions?  


    Should the civil actions for financial compensation, then be followed with criminal actions, in each Nation that failed to uphold and allow primal birth rights to all women and their babies? (See Chow-case-law, Sommers and Roth, Ontario Canada. This child's placenta blood went missing.  Was this a cover-up his oriental blood was worth more then the other blood given the child to live?  Was this a criminal obstruction of justice where the blood went? What do you think?  Should yet a criminal investigation be done by the Police in Ontario?  


    Question:  Each community had a duty to its own.  One mother has taken my suggestion, Get off the Pot or Do Something, that, if I were her, I'd start filing my own Writ in my own child's name, in the community that did not protect the mother or the child.  This one mother, Karen, has done that in the State of Ohio. She filed her own Writ. She is getting the documents and records by means of Discovery. She is in control.  Please, wish Karen luck. Until she filed her own Writ, in do-it-your-self-style, there was no law firm to tackle the various levels of community government to the top, with the largest purse, the Federal Government. Do you think law firms are protecting professional groups at high levels and in the communities?  Do you think they are fulfilling their duties of Oath, no injustice ought to go unopposed, no matter the level or status of those harming another?  Do you think they are upholding the Nation's laws?  Do you think they are upholding the duty by Declarations signed since 1948, involving the United Nations for Human Rights Declarations?  Do you think the United Nations and the World Health Organization should be involved on maternity matters regarding the rights of all women, world wide to have the right to a Birth Contract for a Primal birth, even in the home, or in an institutional ward?


VICARIOUS LIABILITIES:

     Who, might all be involved as doctors, nurses, and administration of hospitals and school districts (false biology textbooks) pass the buck?  Let us see, could that be:  All the licensing medical association groups, nurses, doctors, surgeons, and of the experts?  Would they be collectively and severely accountable for, say, bogus policies and false information in science textbooks?  This would be for biology textbooks directing for the human baby immediate cord clamping and semi-sitting birth positions and any unnecessary medical procedures done without informed consent of risks of viruses to the mother and the child by any cut of the skin or by any injection?  Do you think the medical societies were political in the allowance of clinical studies and policies that they directed active management involving those with a conflict of interest, such as a drug company's and their medical manuals, such as The Merck Manual?  (See Merck Manual on the internet).


    This Ohio mother is taking the necessary legal steps after the Writ to get information, otherwise, blocked to her, at all levels of government.  The Writ is opening the doors for discussions and records that must by law be made available to her.   Only a Writ, starting a complaint, allows the matter to become to a Judge's decision, for a trial date.  


    This Writ is to Discover all about active management and vaccinations, and done without informed choice, and the policies directing it are constitutional and fair and equitable to the woman and her child, now suffering injury. The suffering began at birth and was compounded by further complications of medical services, not adequately controlled by informed risks and right to not take those risks with a member of one's own family.


     In each community, the biology textbooks, paid by the taxpayers dollars (see references in Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com) were inadequate or out-right false in the information on the woman's reproduction system and how to have a healthy birth, free of medical interventions as a choice. (See references this web site).


    The doctors, who would deliver the babies in the institutions, in their own office visits with the pregnant lady, were failing to advise of a mother's rights to have a signed Birth Contract for primal natural birth rights, and to mention, no clamping of the cord or its cosmetic removal was necessary as a medical need.  Why not, unless they had a conflict of interest in the selling of the placenta and the harvesting of the nutrients of the blood deprived her baby.


    Such primal birth rights and care to the child were traditional, from the beginning of time. All women have a right to them, to this day. Never should such information of simple birth, uncomplicated, in most cases, failed to have been told a women.  Simple birth is warmest room possible, warm towels to wrap the baby, clean cloth to wipe his/her nose and mouth; do nothing with the cord, no clamping, or tying; wait for the placenta to be born, wrap in a warm towel, give baby and placenta, close together to the mother to hold and nurse the baby.  That was simple primal birth. NO cutting, no infections, mother healthy, child a blue ribbon child. Those were the primal birth my mother and father had, 1913 and 1914.

    

     These were the ways of our grandmothers, prior to the 1920's.  My grandmother had safe home births. She later also had some safe hospital births, that did not stray from primal birth care, except...then after the 1920's, there was a new trend for the clamping off the cord. It was done for cosmetic removal, and they used drugs to combat infections, of a cut cord. Many babies died in hospitals of infections of cut cords, and to this day 500,000 die annually, from cut cords.


    Primal birth had no cord infections as the umbilical cords were not tied or cut cord. That is not gross compared to sickness of babies caused by active management.  That clamping and cutting of the cord, when the baby was not yet breathing, was promoted by Hollywood films. The politicians moved in and this is a political reason of profits to active management of higher costs when primal births have little costs at all, but a rented room, if an institutional birth is the choice of the mother's. If you wish to see the political profits being governed in child birth becoming a $20 billion dollar USA business read, Witches, Midwives, and Nurses , published in the 1970's. It is available at most universities for studies in women issues and careers in medicine.


    See the Petition site to Protect Babies and their Mothers, Too (link below): This Petition explains what active management is all about and that is harmful practice.  Some persons, like myself, think active management is actually a criminal practice because it is simply imposed and expected not to be opposed by any women, and this is world wide.  Women do not have true informed consent to active management. Most women are told no other rights of child birth or safer options, in most instances. For example, in some clinical studies the controlled choice to women were, "Do you want immediate umbilical cord clamping, or 30-second clamping." The 30-second clamping was promoted as delayed.  True delayed clamping is "after the placenta is expelled and all pulsation has ceased, the cord is white, silver, limp and not pulsating, tested by a stethoscope.  Primal birth is no tying or clamping or cutting the cord ever, and a right of all mothers to request this. If cosmetic removal is preferred, later, hours, later the mother can do this herself. It needs not surgeon's skills, and a tool that clamps and cuts can be purchased, that has never been used on another child's umbilical cord.  


     The threat to the mother birthing today, if she objects to being actively managed is violence called medical mistakes, saying it was deemed necessary, or unavoidable complications.  Here is a perceived controlled accident, that is yet to be investigated as to medical malpractice, and possibly criminal negligence.  . For example, a woman gave birth in Langley, BC, Canada, in the fall of 2003.  This lady requested no clamping on her baby's umbilical cord, at all, ever. It too, was the way of her grandmother, shared to her by her own mother.  The medical persons must have been upset. They would not get a supply of the baby's European blood, if European blood is prime because of the Russians and parts of European exposed to radiation and still needing blood transfusions.  Blood for stem cell research can sell for $30,000 for a few ounces if the race and type of blood is just right.  These medical persons pushed her baby back into her womb, and injured her inside.


     Infection set in, and the woman may never ever have another baby. She is still not well.  This situation, as to my perception from what I have been told, seems, to me, a motive was no blood from our babies to our cause...we'll fix you.  


    Why I think this, is that I have never ever heard of a baby pushed back into the woman's womb for a face-up birth presentation. Baby's are generally born face down and head first.  But babies can be born safely face up, head first,  they can be safely born bum first, and folded up, and feet first, some come hands first.  The babies are soft the mother's birth canal is soft. The woman's pelvic bones are on hinges and hormones such as Relaxin  and Prolactin  are there in undrugged births to help the woman pass her baby safely through the birth canal.  All open up and expand. A drugged birth may interfere with the release of these natural and beneficial hormones, including serotonin .  Serotonin is released by the platelets to seal up torn blood vessels.  It is also alleged released by the brain and is considered the Happy Mood drug, the Woody Allen drug.


    The vaginal cervic (not made of cast iron does not need softening with chemicals that can turn it into mush of creams and insertions) is flexible to allow the baby to exist safely, and the child's birth is best in gravity or forward sitting or forward sideways birth positions that the mother controls. (see these drugs used in maternity cared:  ergometrine, syntometrine, misoprostol (misoprostol is cheap, alleged to be more stable than other oxytocic agents for use in the developing world, and does not have to be given by injection. (Ref. What does prevent postpartum haemorrhage? The Journal : Marc J. N. C Keirse, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flindes University of South Australia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park SA5042, Austrailia). Prenatal care drugs used with serious consequences long-term or short term to both the mother and the child:  Pethidine, a snythetic, addictive, narcotic drug that is similar to morphine.  In Britian, it is also known as Meperidine, and in America, as Demerol.  The midwives use this pharmacological narcotic because that is all they are licensed to prescribe.  The dosage given can be from 25 mg to 150 mg.  Demerol readily corsses the placenta. The baby may have greater sensitivity to the drug because of the immaturity of the blood-brain barrier and the circulatory bypass of the liver (Burt, 1971 higher dose, the more sleepy is the baby.  It takes 18 to 23 hours to eliminate the drug from the baby's system. (Yerby, 1996). see Url: Demerol http://midwiferytoday.com/articles/drugsinlabor.htm   Mothers accepting Demerol often have to have their babies injected with another drug, Naloxone. It is used to revese the effects, and

      The oxygenated blood with drugs and nutrients goes first to the baby's brain, in need of the greatest and purest of oxygen. The fetal circulation by-passes the lungs,through the foramen ovale.  (See fetal circulation system this web site, www.lotusbirth.com).     cytotex, cirfidil, mesopresson on the Internet).


    New mothers and all mothers are encouraged to birth in warm water births, and has a signed birth contract of what cannot be done to her body, in birth, or to her baby, during or after birth, for natural primal birth rights.


    Women are being subjected to unnecessary roughness if they are not complacent.  Another example of imposed control to drug the women, as a standard of care for all women, was just this February 2004. I have a written email from a doctor, an Anesthetists, that he alleged a women died in New Zealand because she insisted on a drugless birth, before and after the child was born.


    He alleged this woman died a painful death, and that she died of bleeding to death, for refusing syntocinon.   That drugs works on the muscles for contractions. It is oxytocin.  None of my reference books state it stops bleeding.  It may pull back torn blood vessels, but that may cause them to bleed more so. The drug companies state this drug stops bleeding.  I have not seen the clinical studies or those that oppose this drug to be imposed on all birth women as a standard of care one drug is for all women.


HORMONES TO SEAL UP TORN BLOOD VESSELS:

    The sealing up of any torn muscles if not infected by too harsh of contractions normally caused by drugs, oxytocin/syntocinon, is by the platelets and their releasing serotonin.  It is not known if an investigation was being conducted on this woman's death. It is not known if this woman was given blood thinners that would reduce her platelets or iron content.  It is not known if this woman was known to be sick or anemic at the time of birth.  Such knowledge is simply found out by a prick of a finger and test run on blood cell count, red, white and the platelets.  This woman may have had an inverted womb by cord contraction, and pressing on her womb.  If she was had not stopped bleeding, she may have required an operation, if her womb was severely damaged.  The World Health Organization directs pushing down on a woman's stomach after given her oxytocin/syntocinon and pulling on the cord. They know it can cause inversion of the womb, and if the womb was imbedded too deep into her womb, pulling on the placenta to come out in demands of impatience of staff and time management, may have been the cause of the bleeding and infection the cause of her death.  If the death did happen, I await a Coroner's report if it will ever be released. The concern I had was that all women had to accept drugs in child birth, during or after the child's birth. This woman was being pressured so she was not being allowed a Signed Birth Contract and her right to decide if and when she would change her mind, if ever, this being her right and none others, in informed choice of all risks told.  It cannot be said this drug will stop bleeding if the drug will also cause other injuries like risk of thyroid problems if chlorobutanol is one of the ingredients in Syntocinon.


    Again, this is fearful to be telling women, she will die unless drugged. That is pressure and is political to support those who make a living drugging those in medical procedures.  Drugging all women as a standard of care is a constitutional violation of rejection of such policies and procedures.  Do you think so too?


    The woman's rights are for her to know about but to be able to refuse active management births, particularly, if the woman is requesting no touching of the child's cord and is taking the child home as a biological, reciprocal sealed unit.  That means if all women learn about this Primal Birth Right.  This means that the hospitals no longer can take as they have been and without informed consent, from  4 to 6 ounces of free blood drained off the early clamped placenta and cord. This blood harvested, for a fee (check the expenses and incomes of the hospital and their codes for each department labs and maternity), they sent to others and also have the placenta to grind up and extract more enzymes and hormones too.


INVASION OF PRIVACY AND TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES SENT TO OTHERS, WITH NO INFORMED CONSENT:

    The placenta, too, is being sold to drug companies and cosmetic companies and to research and into government sponsored grants of stem cell research. This too, at each community hospital was done without true informed consent. There was an invasion of privacy as to DNA and genetic codes going to others.  


    Most families in each community were not aware who had this information of Cells that all have genetic information.  Nor, were they informed how such information released to others might be used against their race, color, or by sex or by age to their group of people.


DEMOCRACY DEPEND ON TRUST:

     The teaching of trust in the professionals and the government levels was so strong to make us too naive and trusting, and not questioning professional groups and their organizations and control of education and policies from the Federal level to the community hospital and local schools and biology courses and prenatal classes. My research reveals in the areas of education K-12, to continuing education, to prenatal classes, to the care and services in the community hospitals, factual information on the woman's reproduction system is missing, and her right to a natural birth, and best practice possible to achieve that, such as warm water births, which our grandmothers had the freedom to have in the liberty of their own homes, and to leave the cord alone, not sever it from the placenta, ever.


    Missing information or false information meant the public at large could not make informed decisions. That is a constitutional violation. When touching of unconsented manner was imposed it may be an issue of criminal assault, battery and even attempted murder.  Policies made by one group cannot be made to take away the Nation's rights given to any other one person, unless by due process of law.  That means the person has a right to have the matter heard in a court if the medical persons can treat a woman so, and her baby, if she says, No, for better protection to herself and her baby. The duty to the child is by all adults, and at all levels of government. The World Health Organization admits no harm done by leaving the cord alone, and no harm done in Primal Birth Rights and Practices.


AN ACTIVELY MANAGED WESTERN SOCIETY IN CHILD BIRTH:

     It seems for the last 4 and 5 generations, women have been deceived from the Federal government down to each community hospital.  This is called breach of trust.  On the hospitals property, there may have been also the participation between Administration, doctor, nurse, and lab technicians the destruction of evidence, by not documenting the disposal of the organ, and the blood taken from any organ and used other then for the needs of the child, as the blood in the placenta was intended by nature for the child's benefit and non other.  


    There may be  criminal medical malpractice, involving many within each community and the allowance of false information in most biology textbooks on the women's reproduction system, the birth of the child, and the management of the child's lifeline, the umbilical cord and the interruption of the circulation system, of the placenta-lung-blood-bag being allowed to transfuse the blood into the child's expanding lungs. This deprivation of volume, pressure and nutrients was then the beginning of all pH disruptions and organ distress, dehydrations, cell respiratory malfunctions, and the list is endless of damage to any one brain or nerve cell.

www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814


For a medical site that opposes hasty clamping and is trying to re-educate doctors to more gentle birth means, is as follows.  The site contains the concerns of a retired O & G, Dr. George M. Morley.  He began to protest bogus reasons alleged in a medical education bulletins put out by ACOG, in 1995 and prior to that year. Some of his concerns can be found at: www.cordclamping.com


For other concerns, by another grandmother, age 79, Doris Haire, who began her concerns in the 1970's, please visit:

www.aimsusa.org


An educator who wrote about the birth injuries associated with drugs during labor and immediate cord clamping was Joseph Chilton Pearce, who published The Magical Child, See chapter Time Bomb, pages 48-50. His book was published in the 1970's and it quoted research done in the 1960's.


In the 1950's, Dr. Mavis Gunther wrote on the facts that umbilical cords, if left alone, will pulsate for 20 minutes. This is visual evidence that can be seen again and again in Primal births, for c-sections and vaginal births.  See some of her comments at this web site.  


Dr. Mavis Gunther quoted her first revelation of written harm, of visual common sense, back to Dr. Erasmus Darwin in 1801.


Many medical books have been published and emergency manuals have reported the safety of Primal births and leaving the lifeline alone, from the 1920's, to the written documents of letters in my own files, from the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons, that all doctors were trained and are to leave the umbilical cord alone until all pulsation ceases.  It is the duty of every parent, whose child was violated by early cord clamping, if I were them, to file a Writ for medical malpractice and unnecessary endangering and weakening of their baby or babies, if multiple births. All babies can have no clamped cords. Only if the cord tore or for placenta previa are there any good reasons for the benefit of the child to have the cord stopped of the pulsation. The clamping must be followed up with appropriate protection to the child of lost oxygenated blood, quickly.  (See chow-case-law . My perception of the judgement of some $8 million dollars was the cutting off of the child's circulation system was not an appropriate reason, given as a cord around the neck to cut the cord. The baby was slow to be revived with more blood volume, and was anemic and lives, blind, mute (deaf) and paralyzed.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR OF LOTUSBIRTH:

    I am the author of lotusbirth.com. My only titles are mother and grandmother.  I began to wonder, separately and apart of knowledge of the others good works, in 1998. I include them in my own studies clamping the cord is harmful and cause internal damages to any child so violated. It weakens the child and takes away their potential genius potential. The clamping was done at the discretion of the medical persons, who then controlled who would have the healthiest baby, by sex, by color, by race, by social/class status or marital status, or by blood type (selling the deprived blood), or by mental or physical disadvantage.  In 1999, I began writing letters of concern that immediate cord clamping was the root of learning and behavior problems and delayed learning of children by two or three years. My perspective that this is an alleged trend, means the government at all levels, in all communities permitted it in times of war and in times of science research but this was in violation of trust to the women trusting in no harm done if they used the governments approved medical institutions and approved licensed medical workers.


    My research has confirmed multi-factors, for children internal injuries, leading to learning and behavior problems. This leads to higher medical costs and education costs, which is not in the best interest of the burdens placed on the tax payers.


     All the internal injuries at birth can be prevented by proper education of women for their rights in Primal Birth Care - natural birth.  The internal injuries can in all probabilities, be reviewed and traced back to birth injuries and births involving drugs, followed by injections and vaccinations. These are all contributing factors and not real necessary to have had at all, if primal birth rights had been respected, even on hospital turf.  


    It is any wonder that one in four adults have heart problems, or the increasing number of persons with lung, and stroke problems, brain tumors, cancers, and all increases in the children, autism said to be leading in disorders of those under the ages of 11.


    Children have learning disorders and behavior problems, and to get help must have labels such as  ADDS, Autism (increased from 1 in 30,000*  in the 1970's, and now the children with autism are 1 in 110 reported in the 2000's. (* World Book, Vol. A, p 913, 1979).

    

    The children have increased weight problems, (thyroid malfunctions, either too thin or too fat). The children have increased diabetic conditions in the youth and anemic problems, the most common of all.  Anemia is blood loss. We have blood loss by 4 to 6 ounces caused by the placenta blood deprivation at birth by early clamping...the number one probable common cause linked to internal disorders, world wide.

POLITICAL PROSPERITY IN PROFITS BUT SICKNESS INCREASED IN THE NATION:

    The groups that prospered were, of course, the government at the top, any increase of costs to the public brings them higher tax revenues.  Those paying the higher revenues in higher profits were the professional groups in education, medical, and law, and in science, in stem cell research, in particular, controlled by private blood banks and in off-campus university research stations.


    Those that lost in health and in wealth were mostly the common folk, you and me, our babies and our grandchildren. They were exploited for profits. They had no choice. They had no informed means the system was against them in false information.


     We, the present and past families, were the least prepared and informed. We were the ones to told to trust others, the professionals, that they'd do us no harm.  Well,  trust has responsibilities and accountabilities, particularly, when the trust has been breached.


    In the care of mothers and babies, it has been breached, secretly, for a long time.  When two or more groups organize against one group or another, to their disadvantage, it is called a conspiracy. It can bring both civil and criminal charges to be addressed, according to law, in the Court.  Let us hope the courts have and will maintain integrity to be fact finders, and was their any good cause for active management as a standard of care for all women and all children. I think not.


Home Page:   www.lotusbirth.com   There is a Table of Contents.


    Thank you for visiting a Canadian Mother and Grandmother's site.  Please share my concerns with others. I do hope you share that going back to natural is best after all, and that the only protection or assurance for a normal birth expectation is for a primal birth right. This can be achieved by a Birth Contract/Waiver in a rented room in a hospital (if you need that security) is best assured if you take a door stop. And the same in a home birth, if you have invited any professional person to be on hand. That information of recommendation for assured birth right privacy, to take along a door stop, I give credit to Dr. M. Wagner.  I add, put up a sign, Contracted Primal Birth In Progress.  Do not disturb the mother. She and/or her Birth Witnesses will call the expert if needed. Mother is progressing fine.


    Another doctor who advocates primal birth privacy and few, if any interventions, is Dr. M. Odent.


    A mother Doctor, Dr. Sarah Buckley has lead the way in primal birth rights, what the pioneers did before the 1920's, now called the Lotus Birth. She shares her concerns and experience at my web site, www.lotusbirth.com   See Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration .


    Many many organizations of concerned mothers, fathers, and grandparents are up and running on the internet, that focus on mercury poisoning, and harmed babies during an active managed birth in an institution or in a home birth by present trained medical midwives.  They must be contracted of what the mother will not allow on their bodies in touching or in management of the child's lifeline.


    I do believe the radiation sickness in children known to have been exposed to radiation is very similar to the children sick with mercury poisoning. To confirm the type of mercury that was used in the vaccinations, and to this day, may be simply a matter of just doing tests for radiation in their blood and urine to know if the vaccinations didn't have possibly recycled radioactive mercury used. This would have been likely recycled mercury as a cheap source to use up this contamination  That would be by spreading it around some, eh?  Anything is possible.  


    Our world is not round.  It is crooked.  It is very political for profits. Politicians and high government officials can take bribes to look the other way. They can have shares offered in a going-concern that they know the governments are patronizing who gets to exploit the people, and created mandatory service imposed on them, and take away their Constitutional Rights to the individual to be self-governing for self-protection vs the rights to corporation rights of profits by exploiting the people, not informed or educated on such goings-on. That is the way I see politics and sick kids going together. Some may even call this organized crime.  It is time for an investigation starting at the community levels. That begins with any individual's filing of a Writ.  The Discoveries then follow.  You can put in Court orders for Interrogatories (Questions that must be answered), you find out Who, When,Where, Why and you get to add third parties to the actions, each time someone says, "Who, Not Me, over there, it that department or that college, or that society, or that association, not us. Let the Judge decide.  The Judge allows a hearing to set a trial for a settlement.


Contact Donna Young, a Canadian Mother and Grandmother:   dyoung@pris.ca


Table of Contents , that is easiest to read, and just click on the title when on
the internet, and they should open. www.lotusbirth.com/_cont0.htm

 Originally posted: March 18, 2004


Please give reference by the 'Website www.lotusbirth.com  or the specific Page Url when giving credit of resource information in your research.  Thank you