Autism: CHILDSCREEN DEFENDS Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Feb 26, 2004.

Autism:  Kathy Blanco, The President of CHILDSCREEN has given permission to share her concerns on the debate on the safety of vaccinations and the investigative findings of Dr Andrew Wakefield. See, below, in red titles, what are you afraid of?   DEAR SIRS OF THE LANCET.    Shared by Donna Young of Natural Birth Education.  February 29, 2004 (www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-568.htm)

There are some persons, of a political interest, apparently trying to destroy credit, as to possible evidence that Dr. Andrew Wakefield has found common to gut damage to children  -- these are vaccinations reactions. And, as to any conflict of interest he may have had as an expert witness in a pending court case, is that really important to the cause of probable cause of sick children and stopping that source of illness?!  Doctors, today, for political interests, treat symptoms, they do not cure or prevent problems. Why Not?  If you have no political interest but want healthy children, we want the truth of probable causes and all politics set aside. The well-being of all children is what all Nations should seek and strive for and by all adults. Adults too want to be healthy and not sick.  It is not a normal part of aging for any person to have a shrinking brain, called Alzheimer. Yet, young persons as well of the old have this affliction, or its symptoms. This is as though all were being poisoned. What do all victims of an internal disease have in common, from birth, until any illness presents itself, in latent form. I say, most, if not all, if born in an institution, had immediate umbilical cord clamping.  Only those born in a taxi cab, on their way to be born in a hospital, did not have their pulsating cords tied off.  And these babies all thrived, speaking in favor of primal births, or natural births bests, after all.

What the public want to know... "Is the population, adults and babies in danger from the medical policies and procedures of today?"  We need to have all opinions offered to us and the courts, as to what possible evidence exists of common happenings, such as gut problems. What do they have in common with sick children. It is the vaccinations? Are there too many vaccinations, given at one time? Or, are vaccinations given too soon for a young child's premature immunity system?  Japan does not vaccinate children under 24 months of age. Should all Nations do that?   I think setting aside financial political interests is in the interest of finding out why we have sick children, and many now sick adults. This is in the best interest of society.

The public must know of any risk to their child by injecting them with multi-vaccinations. These injections are being imposed on them if they are to attend social institutions, like private and/or public schools, or receive care from government provided services. Vaccinations earn income to those providing the services. Politicians, like the President of the USA, can earn income by having shares in drug companies.

Most politicians, the leaders, and those serving on Drug and Food Committees, those in the Ministry of Health and in Education, can know before all others whose contracts they are accepting in government use of tax dollars in providing medical services.  The policies they have a conflict of interest then bend their decisions in the way that it is profitable to them. Even not calling back bad vaccination Lots are political as to an expense to someone, somewhere.  Let's not kid ourselves, political interests are all financial interests. And it may be the politicians attitude is "Babies be Darned...they are not a tax earner, as yet."  Well, the damaged children do grow up. Will these politicians and those responsible fear God or fear Man?!  We should do all in good conscience and in the spirit of the law -- do no harm. If we have wronged -- then compensate those who have been injured. It will cost us no more. This is if women return to Primal Birth and the present annual $20 billion baby birth business is allocated to the present living victims.  After their lifetime is over, there should be no more sick babies, hopefully.  This is if the damage is not permanent to our reproduction systems.  Let us hope God spares our Nations of that fate.  Is it not said, "if we turn from our ways, and repent, God will heal our land?" Why not ask God to do this?!

Active management is the political care of women birthing for the past three and four generations.  All these factors of active management can be found in disadvantaged children and adults living today.  

Primal births have healthy children and satisfied women, these generally are, gentle births to the mother and child. This we can see of other placenta-birthing mammals.  Most other mammals fear man at birth and seek to hide.  Women should seek to birth with only their closest friend, with an arrangement they do not touch her baby's lifeline, but merely hold the baby in a warm towel. They do this until the baby's after birth, the placentas, is expelled. That can be from 5-minutes to 20-minutes.  Then it too, is kept with the baby, close and wrapped in a warm towel. The baby (or babies)is now nursing from his/her mother's breast.  That is primal birth.  It is called Lotus Birth. It is plain, simple, and uncomplicated in 95 percent of all births.  The faster we get back to the primal birth, hand's off birth,  there will a return of our healthy blue ribbon babies. They will have full immunity system and be strong in every way.

These ICC babies were all oxygenated blood impaired to the brain and to the nervous system, needlessly. They, then, were all weakened at birth by the known evidence of fact of deprived blood.  This is factually visual, not opinion. This is because the blood is seen as it is measured out from the placenta that the medical persons took from the babies. The average blood sent to cord stem cell blood is  4 to 6 ounces of blood.  A 9-pound baby only creates a total 10 ounces of blood, and half likely was used in stem cell research. And, not necessarily, with informed consent of the legal guardians of the child, the parents. The cord stem cell blood banks do further harvesting of the blood. They only keep a tiny portion of the baby's blood the stem cells. That is all the parent's contracted for, not knowing to ask questions, "what happens to the rest of the babies blood."  Their answer will be it is appropriately discarded. Well, it is discarded into the bank accounts of the cord stem cell blood banks, who profit extra by selling all components of blood to other interests not revealed to the parents.  Such facts can be found by an audit of their income and expense records.  It has been a breach of trust as the parents did not contract for "others" not approved by them to have a drop of their babies blood. So where is the evidence the cord stem cell blood banks destroyed the blood by burning, then the hospitals, who alleged they, too, discarded by burning. Did they?  What records prove that it was burned, or was used by giving to others with a state holding interest in blood.

Financial political interests are in big business of gathering human organs and blood.  Most of this has been a medical conspiracy on the people, of course, they have said it was good for science and medicine and in treating disease. But they are treating only the diseases they have had a hand in creating, in the first instance.  Missing hormones and enzymes to babies are sold back.  Hormones to make us strong and not to age faster, are sold back to us.  What would our life be like, if we were not survivors of harvesting, at birth?

That is a political interests of concealing and use of blood to its fullest potential the population deceived on this issue.  Why? The governments allowed this to go on, unchecked and not investigated by the duty of our nations laws to do so. Enforcement of no harm done is properly done by the investigation by the police.  But if they are not doing their duty, they are not doing so because of a state political interest in shares of big business, and the State directs who the police will investigate and who will come to trial.  That is a conflict of interest not to provide security of person to every man, woman, and child, equally. These are our Nations laws, in criminal law, civil and Constitutional law, and unwritten laws of ethics and moral duty to one another -- do no harm.  

. The conflict of interest is obviously with the State and the doctors and those in research (Cord stem cell blood). How long has this secret harvesting of our babies, being going on. Well, I'd say, for the last 3 and 4 generations, every since women had few options but to birth in institutions.  There, the State allowed for political interests the babies to be wrongfully deprived of their own property, their placenta blood. That blood was intended to go into the child's expanding lungs. An investigation at each community hospital and their labs and their accounting records, if brought to a hearing or Discovery would indicate the placenta and the blood are being sold to the highest bidders.  

The Administration staff at every hospitals are involved as to known policies that were made by their own appointed ethics committees allowed this. On their boards were officers of the justice system, the lawyers who knew best to provide for the security of the person, the baby.  That assault means a baby does not have to have physical damage, but that the damage can be internal, the evidence is of one in sixteen babies revived after birth today.  Any revived baby of oxygen and blood expanders is a compromised child. The degree of impairment will be situational to the growing environment and means of the parent to supply the child's individual needs.

The placenta organ and the blood it had contained was income to the hospitals. Many of the administration and the nurses who witnessed this going on, and the labs receiving the blood, convinced themselves that they believed no harm was done to the child, as it was being revived.  It lived.

 Most babies did not die, even knowing they had been actually blood-let and was anemic from the day the child left their premises, even jaundiced. A condition that would be with the child for two weeks or more, unless the baby was given more blood.   Of course, the true cause of the condition was not told the parents, who were happy to leave the hospital with a merely "living" baby, not a genuinely healthy blue ribbon baby. What could they do about it, love unconditional, when dealing with your baby.  Nevertheless, weakness and vulnerability to disorders has been a serious breach of trust that must be justified in a court, some day, soon.

Harvesting babies is a billion dollar business. The baby birth business is a $20 Billion USA industry,  just for the mother's to birth in institutions.

This cost to the medical insurance companies and the Nation is unnecessary. Women need to be better educated and it is no good excuse today why they are not informed.  Most internal sickness can stop if women start going for a rented room, if they must go into an institution to give birth, but insisting on the right for a birth contract for a no hand's on, a primal birth.

The mother births unassisted and has her own birth witnesses with her, paid or not.  Primal birth is really what is now called the Lotus Birth, after Claire Lotus Day. This lady thought it wise to birth by primal customs, as did the monkeys.  She found a doctor who agreed not to touch the cord. She birthed her baby, and in an institution, but no one clamped or cut the umbilical cord, ever. This was primal birth in the remaking of how my grandmother birthed her babies that way back in 1913.  As to no removal or tying of the umbilical cord, I knew about it when I was age 14, and I thought gross.  How regretful I am that I did not have the biology facts of science to know this care to the child's placenta and cord was most wise. I did not understand the wisdom of the practice of primal birth:  No cord infections from a cut cord (500,000 babies die around the world from cut cords including in Western Societies), there are no hernias, and the blue ribbon healthy babies had all their nutrients in their blood, these were: all hormones, all enzymes and all immunities, to keep them well into their second year of life, if for not all of their lives. Healthy babies, for example, are my parents, born by the method of primal unassisted births, yet live my dad to be 90 in April 2004, my mother to be 91 in June 2004.  Japan stopped all vaccinations until the child is 24 months of age, hoping to have stopped autistic children.  If they were not early clamped babies, their babies, at birth, means they will have built up stronger immunities. Should any baby in any Nation have less provisions of good health.  I think not. It is a duty for all adults to work for educated women to be in control and birth safely, in primal fashion, with a witness. In a primal birth, the woman has full freedoms to strengthen her energies with food, beverage, to release contraction discomfort by freedom to move around, and to birth in the position of her choice or change that position by the intuition of the mother. If you watch a mare not shackled in small quarters, she may birth her foul by rolling over a few times, as necessary to position her foul for easier birth.  It is important for the female, in birth, to be in the control.  For political reasons, active management, for the past three and four generations, has been a major contributor of causing the mother and her child, internal injuries.    

Blue ribbon babies, born by primal methods, are known to take the stresses easier. Babies that were not drugged during labor and birth, nor early cord clamped can learn easier and faster.  It is in societies best interest to have healthy babies, not sick babies. Women being educated and supported to go back to primal births is a good way of prevention of internal injuries to babies and from any predisposition to disorders (autism), after any vaccinations.  The Lotus birth (primal birth) is best practiced in birthing babies in warm water births.  And true primal birth (Lotus Birth) is no injections in the mother's body or into the child's, ever. Injections or removal of fluids or blood should be not done if there is no evidence of any need to do a test for speculation purposes. This includes scanning the baby.  Such fluid removal testing can be exposing the family to genetic an DNA testing, or imposing that without true informed consent what PKU testing is all about.  It is getting genetic information on two sides of the family. The results become a permanent record on the child's medical charts filed with the registration of all births, and their Apgar scores.  Who all knows what the government knows on the child, at birth, after they birth, publicly in government controlled institutions and by government controlled medical person(s)?  Primal birth, unassisted in the homes, at least keeps all births more confidential, particularly, if it is only the mother's closest trusted friend (s) or family, present as a witness of the child's care and treatment.  

Well, enough of my thoughts and concerns. Here are others as to their opinions on the cause of autism and to defense for Dr. Andrew Wakefield, as he puts out a theory of his science research and evidence of probable cause of autism, or at least, a contributing factor from live viruses from Hot lots of vaccinations.

_______________

MMR doctor: I stand by my research on autism By Michael Day

(Filed: 22/02/2004)

The British doctor who claimed to have identified a link between the MMR vaccine and autism last night angrily rejected claims that the research was "flawed" as parents of children involved in the original study accused his critics of a "witch-hunt."

Dr Andrew Wakefield  

Dr Andrew Wakefield, whose research sparked the nationwide controversy over the safety of the triple vaccine, told the Telegraph: "I stand by the findings reported in The Lancet. We have identified important illness in children and raised important questions about child health."

Dr Wakefield spoke out after allegations yesterday that his 1998 study of 12 children was flawed because he had also been working on a separate project to seek evidence to support a legal action by parents claiming that the MMR jab had harmed their children. He said: "That was a completely separate study. We took children according to clinical need. There was no selective recruitment."

Rosemary Kessick, whose child developed autism after receiving the MMR vaccine, defended Dr Wakefield. "This is a witch-hunt. By attempting to smear researchers like Dr Wakefield who are raising important questions, the establishment is impeding our right to know about illness and even how we might prevent it," she said.

Dr Wakefield, who lives in Kew, south-west London, dismissed suggestions of deliberate bias in his study. Critics claimed that Dr Wakefield, a consultant gastroenterologist, veered from accepted research practice by deliberately selecting children whose parents already suspected a link between the triple jab and their children's autism.

He also rejected criticism by Dr Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, who said that Dr Wakefield should have alerted the journal to the work relating to measles and MMR that he was doing for the Legal Aid Board.

Dr Horton said the work represented a "fatal conflict of interest" and that he now regarded Dr Wakefield's findings as "entirely flawed".

Dr Wakefield dismissed the claims. He added that criticism directed at him for failing to declare £55,000 of funding to carry out the work was "specious for the same reasons".

Last night Dr Wakefield was backed by the Royal Free and University College medical school where the research was carried out. The school said in a statement: "We are entirely satisfied that the investigations performed on the children reported in The Lancet had been subjected to appropriate and rigorous ethical scrutiny."

Mrs Kessick, a spokesman for the group Allergy-induce Autism, which represents parents of children who have developed bowel disease and autism after having the MMR jab, said that The Lancet's retraction of confidence in its own report had worrying implications for medical research.

"Such a position has major implications for the scientific investigation of injuries that might be caused by drugs or vaccines, such as autism, where possible victims may be seeking help and also gain legal redress," she said.

John Reid, the Health Secretary, yesterday backed calls for an independent inquiry. He urged the General Medical Council to mount an investigation "as a matter of urgency".

For publishers wishing to reproduce photographs on this page please phone 44 (0) 207 538 7505 or email syndicat@telegraph.co.uk

 21 February 2004: Lancet was wrong to publish MMR paper, says editor

   Related reports   

 Theodore Dalrymple: Health scare

 Families defend Dr Wakefield

 The Lancet

 Royal Free and University College Medical School

----- Original Message -----

From: JAMES BLANCO

To: pressoffice@lancet.com  

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:29 PM

Subject: what are you afraid of?

http://image.thelancet.com/extras/statement20Feb2004web.pdf  

DEAR SIRS OF THE LANCET

In response to your allegations of Dr Wakefield, I enter my plea.   A plea from a mother who has LONG AWAITED for truth to come to bare.

What are you afraid of?   I am afraid of a lot of things these days.  I have two children who have autistic enterocolitis, with VACCINE STRAIN measles in their lymph nodes, and soon to test CSF.   I have children who are victims who were vulnerable to infections and had reactions to multiple live vaccines such as MMR and DPT, and have already revealed a marked drop in T-lymphocytes and other viral processes.  If they would have been identified as children with unique biological makeups, then I think you should EXCLUDE those children with high susceptibilities, including:

    C4B anulles, HLA/MHC haplotypes, families with autoimmune disorders, families with iron disorders, zinc and copper metabolism problems, thrombaphilia influences, purine and Pku downwind amino acid disorders, adenosine deaminase problems, mothers that have CFS and FMS with activated HHV-6,  MELISA lymphocyte allergies to components in vaccines, Hyper IgE on Cord Blood, Antitrypsin and Chymotrypsin deficiencies, IgG subclass deficiencies, Secretory IgA deficiency, G alpha Protein Defects,  Hypogammaglobulenmia's, pyrlorria, wilsons type presentations, Metallothionein disorders, Glycoslyation disorders and not to mention, mothers who were exposed to AMalgam fillings and other toxic mercury exposures, toxins including heavy metals and molds, stress, cigarette smoke and whom birthed their babies improperly through ICC cord clamping, certain vitamin deficiencies,  pitocin usage,* and had C sections.  All mothers that had or have viruses in utero with concominant use of antipyretics, and while vaccine reacting should be excluded.

(* added February 29, 2004, by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education, for clarification of other names for Pitocin are Toesen, Oxytocin, Syntocinon)

     If you people would have prescribed to this, you can STOP AUTISM TODAY.  You are actually stopping treatment modalities, that for the first time in autism history, there is hope, there is a way out, there is way to reduce and improve the symptoms of autism.  However, I am aligned to think that this can all be PREVENTED.   By newborn screens designed to detect a sitting duck child, we in fact can work together.  Herd immunity will still be held up, and better vaccines, safer ones (if there is such) can be had for those who want them.   I am sick to death of the complacency while millions of children suffer.

Are you brave enough to look at these facts, that is the question, or does science get in YOUR way of stopping the epidemic?  To stop Dr Wakefield's efforts cries out to me obstructionism, malice, cowardly, and integrative manicured disintegration of common facts so that cutting edge EPIGENETIC factors of autism will NEVER BE EXPLORED, rather genetics, genetics, genetics.   Can you explain a genetic epidemic?     

The vulnerability of those who want the truth, are at stake, and more, the vulnerability of an unproven paradigm that our immune systems are ALL THE SAME and VACCINES ARE A ONE SIZE FITS ALL.  All we ask is to DUPLICATE Dr WAKEFIELD STUDY in the halls of CDC and NIH with us present through all materials and guidelines.  Let us reason together, that if you don't do this, you are an obstructionist waiting for the downfall and the truth to hit the fan.  

 Perhaps large movements should be had to disclose these facts and to ask/push for such studies to be done in common bounds of science.   What warrants this replicative study is the fact that autoimmune mechanisms and immune mechanisms are now being understood.   We know what ruins a child's brain and gut, without the autism label, let's oversee what can be overseen says you.   Let's not give these implicating studies the light of day or funding, when a product we admonish for all Americans to take with a blind eye to what facts are.     

Let us recognize what is abnormal in a gut and brain, REGARDLESS if they have autism!  In fact, could these precious children be in complete and utter pain, as to dismay their ability to be "in our world"?

In fact, my kids have at the cellular level (from the words of Dr Barbara Brewitt, world renown expert on HIV), measles causing cell cycle cessation, especially during the GO/G1 phase where major decisions regarding the cell's fate are determined.   Measles enters a cell via the CD46 receptor  (HIV uses the CD4 receptor). If the CD46 receptor is unavailable, then the measles also enters via IGF-1 and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors.  

Areas of the brain affected in autism are similar to the sites affected by the measles and measles-related complications,  including the cerebellum, the hippocampus, amygdala, cingulate gyrus, hypothalamus, and the frontal and temporal lobes of the cerebral cortex.

The cerebellum is responsible for motor skills and coordination while the hippocampus and cerebral cortex are related to memory and emotions (the limbic system).

The amygdala partly controls gastrointestinal tract functioning as well as processing sensory information -- especially input related to survival mood-responses such as fear, anger, and aggression. Autistic children have damaged amygdalas and are well known to lack normal fear and stress responses and have dysfunctional gastrointestinal systems.

Ironically, measles both stimulates and suppresses different parts of the immune system.  Measles stimulates maturation of antigen-presenting cells in skin, gut and lungs. Measles also induces growth factor secretion such as granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and other maturation and stimulation factors that consequently regulate the immune system during future infections. (24) Aberrant expression of TGFB1 can stimulate inflammatory and fibrotic tissue formation and high intracellular TGFB1 may induce over-expression of CD46 receptors, a portal for measles virus entry.

Measles additionally suppresses CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes, and possibly prevents cells from entering the cell cycle. The stages of the cellular decision-making process (transition from GO through G1) leading up to the cell division are normally controlled by PDGF, and either epidermal growth factor (EGF) or IGF-1. TGFB1 also participates in determining what cells will live, die or specialize.

There are three types of measles-related brain inflammations (encephalitis) .  First, an acute post-infectious type can occur near initial infection, characterized by inflammation around blood vessels and loss of myelin. Second, a brain inflammation presenting 1-10 years post-infection, called subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), characterized by a persistent measles infection with many mutations (like HIV) inside the cells of the cerebellum and spinal cord in people with competent, mature, immune systems. SSPE can be fatal because it destroys brain tissue, leads to progressive dementia, seizures, and chronic neurological disorders affecting coordination.  This would handily explain those children with regressive autism, those who seemingly didn't react at first site to vaccines, yet have a growing problem about to begin!

The final measles-related brain complication is progressive and infectious to immuno-compromised people such as children. This form manifests itself 1-6 months following measles infection.

Common symptoms include seizures, motor and sensory system deficits, and lethargy (fatigue) with the acute or sub-acute progressive encephalitis. The symptoms arise from brain tissue death caused by unrestricted viral replication. Symptoms of measles infection in the brains of people without competent immune systems are too similar to autism to ignore. While measles vaccination decreased the first two types of nervous system complication, the third form remains problematic in an increasing population of people with compromised or immature immunity.

The measles infects specific brain areas such as the frontal cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, substantia nigra, locus ceruleus, raphe nuclei, hippocampus, amygdala, rhinal cortex and cingulate gyrus where neurons have specific CD46 or growth factor receptors. These are commonly damaged areas of the brain in autism.

Immunization Policies Need to Rethink Purpose and Child Development Fact s

Government immunization policies are based upon the logic that vaccines will stimulate the immune system. The difference with measles is that, similar to HIV it suppresses the very immune cells that are supposed to fight against it and it is given much too early during childhood development. While the measles normally mutates only one-third as fast as HIV,  shifts in magnesium to manganese cations in the body can significantly enhance viral mutation rates by 6-10 fold.

   Vaccines contain mercury , theoretically driving the mutation process higher and rendering immune systems less effective. Viral mutations can escape vaccine protection and or drive measles mutant strains in the body toward continued successful mutation.

The use of viruses, bacteria and animal tissue cultures in mass immunization campaigns, considering that this information has been known for 20 years, constitutes an intentionally created hazard to humans.

The global impact on the wide range of genotypes relative to human beings is difficult to assess, but the outcome is definitely negative, and permitting the seeding of latent proviruses in humans, knowingly, can have no other rationale other than future medical profiteering, and constitutes a criminal conspiracy of vast proportions which is tantamount to a genocidal policy against the population , further constituting crimes against humanity,   which is internationally punishable by death. But, of course, especially in the United States, this fact is ignored and suppressed from public knowledge, despite a 1984 plea by some U.S. physicians to the United Nations in a report. The fact that this goes on with the full knowledge of the world medical community makes this an international conspiracy where the population has no recourse, given that vaccinations are becoming mandatory and a prerequisite for many social programs. *

(*Note:  Added by Donna Young, February 29, 2004, my mother had to receive vaccinations for the flu to enter long-term senior citizen's home facilities. The vaccination contained mercury.  I believe my parents may have been vaccinated to receive home care support by some contractors.  My mother now has Alzheimer which is not part of naturally growing old).

    Persistence of long-term viruses and foreign proteins and their relationship to chronic and degenerative disease was also pointed out by Dr. Robert Simpson of Rutgers University in 1976, when he addressed science writers at an American Cancer Society seminar, saying "these proviruses could be molecules in search of a disease."

Dr. Wendell Winters, a virologist at the University of California noted, "immunizations may cause changes in slow viruses and changes in the DNA mechanism." Although host cells containing latent viral particles operate more or less normally, they begin to synthesize viral proteins under the guidance of the viral DNA, eventually creating the circumstances for various autoimmune diseases, including diseases of the central nervous system, which unfortunately add to the growing load of aberrant social behavior patterns.   In fact, we found out we have such a slow virus in our family, the SV-40 virus.  All of us are positive.

Please please please I beg you, to give Dr Wakefield his due recourse and explanation as provided to you already which satisfies my every question, but of yours?  What is your response?   Failure to do so, will lend more enhanced searched and funding towards independent researchers to ensure TRUE SCIENCE comes to bare.   Any more motions on your part to halt such science smells too much of you protest too much for a darn good reason.   I FIND FAULT WITH THE VACCINE RESEARCHERS and those who comfort them by underhanded deals in silent secret meetings (including the government sponsors), of which your bodies attend and agree with.

We can make this much more complicated than it ever has to be.  What is your choice on this, the children, or your industry and perception?

Kathy Blanco

Pres of CHILDSCREEN

www.childscreen.com  

www.voicesofsafety.com

______________________________

Link of political profits is: http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/

Comments and thoughts of Donna Young, Natural Birth Education:

There are many conflict of interests involved in medical care, and I relate the links at the end of the article, in particular, policies are written to give a certain freedom to doctors in their care of their patients. But the doctors are failing to provide warnings and risks of the policies of clinical standards of care they intend to impose without informed choice or risk or safer options.  In my view point, any touching or injection of the body without informed right to say no or informed choice or "all" the risks know is assault, battery, attempted murder, and is murder, if the person died.  

Kathy Blanco points out some children may have a predisposition to internal damages if they are vaccinated. Her list clearly would eliminate most children from any vaccinations, at all.  She asks, how do we have an generic epidemic in the related increase of autism?  Indeed, how do we have a generic epidemic in any of the illness increased since multiple vaccinations which are often followed at birth, after immediate umbilical cord clamping.

Here is what I believe we will find to be common factors of all internal sickness of children, whether it is autism, now better defined and the link to that is funds for schooling of the children, whereas no funds were given without a label recognized of a permanent nature, such as ADDS. These illness cannot be tested for, they must be agreed to the diagnoses of teachers, doctors, and whomever, participates in the study of the child, the illness and their behavior.  

So what do all these children have in common that have brain tumors, cancers, diabetic problems, weight problems, holes in the heart, muscle disorders, blood disorders.  They all start life shy of hormones, enzymes, white blood, red blood, platelets, vitamins, minerals, plasma. Why? Because of the policy of immediate cord clamping on all American and Canadian babies.  The political policies allowed that for the then harvesting of the baby's deprived blood. That adds to the confers of government spending in research grants.  The higher the incomes and the profits to personal interest in shares of labs and drug companies, the better it is for those approving policies of what I call medical negligence, not best practice possible or least risk harm to the consumer of the medical services.  These children also had in common, all part of active management, prone or supine birth positions.

This is known to harm the mother as well as the child, it is more painful to them both.  The mothers birth canal is knowingly closed by up to 30 percent, proven back in 1913.  But the doctors found supine birth position best for their delivery, done from their convenience of height to catch a baby.  How did they convenience themselves to catching babies.  Well, they made it a policy to do a cut on the mothers body, an episiotomy. They made it a rule all first time mothers would be routinely cut, to enlarge her birth canal. They then routinely used forceps and /or vacuum to pull the baby, unnaturally form her womb, or use the strength of their hands to twist the baby out of the birth canal.  During this time the mother has be drugged with morphines, and spinals.  All these cross the placenta and go directly and full strength to the baby's brain. This is because the fetal blood circulation system bypasses the lungs, that in an adult's system deal with impurities in the blood, as well as the liver, kidneys and spleen.  Not so, for the fetus, the placenta is the organ that acts in multi-purpose, lungs, spleen, kidneys, liver....as the baby's system is not fully operational and is very tiny to deal with drugs of this nature.

The babies at birth are immediate cord clamped and their brains have had oxygen debt.  The brain and nervous system cannot deal with oxygen debt as can other reproducing cell organs, so they are more prone to be damaged by any dehydration of there cells.

Where other cells replace themselves over time, like a red cell, is newly created in 7 days, and lives to 120 days, that is not known to be true of the brain cells. They die, and that is it.  The undamaged cells only get bigger, and this is true of the nervous system cells.  

This is known and taught in most encyclopedias and high school textbooks.  What those usual reference books do not adequately share is the risk of the mother accepting drugs, false prone birth positions, and the endangering of the child by unnecessary immediate cord clamping.  So these things are factors not necessary if the mother was educated on natural birth, which is primal birth, nothing of medical state-of-the-art technology used on the mother or the baby.  Primal birth is known on the internet as Lotus Birth. LotusBirth is primal birth as far as not clamping the cord or severing it.

Following the anemic condition of the child, at birth the child is vaccinated, generally with Hep B and Vitamin K.  These have questionable preservatives in them, and there is no informed disclosure. The child is also inserted into the skin to remove a blood sample, for a genetic testing for PKU (parents can say not to this invasion of privacy or in this method of getting testing material).  Any insertion of the skin to put stuff into the baby or take blood or fluids out risks at the point of injection a virus getting into the baby's blood stream. The virus that gets into the baby's blood stream can be fast or slow acting.

  How soon the baby gets sick will depend on the ability of the parents to provide on-going ultimate care and nourishment. Some babies will thrive better on breast milk, others may thrive on formula.  I go with natural as best, always, because so many formulas have been recalled for this cause or another. But all mothers cannot nurse, having bad health, before birth, as well as after their baby's birth.  Following an still anemic condition, following immediate and early umbilical cord clamping, the babies are vaccinated with multiple shots, at two months of age, and thereafter.  

The autism will be one of the many internal injuries. All were unnaturally risked to the child.  No parent had informed choice.  The government has permitted contamination of our environments so anemic children are exposed to contaminates in the water, air, soil and in all or most foods.  It is any wonder, we have sick children.

I am of the position that the medical societies, colleges, and associations did not give informed choice. The worked with the State, Province, Territory in political policies that are financial in nature, and not necessarily in the best interest of the medical consumer.  I believe an Official Commissioned Inquiry must be done for maternity care and treatment of the mother and the newborn child.  

Then we can see if this is due for some high officials, in the Food and Drug Divisions, the Ministries of Health and Education and Science (Biology in particular), and at the levels of Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and Colleges of Midwifery, need to have the highest officials or elected members stand trial for Criminal charges. This is happening in Canada that the confidence in the medical services must apply for all and that the enforcement of the Nation's laws, criminal, must be upheld to all, regardless, of status of the person in our society.  In Canada, we had a Krever Report to study the Contamination of the Canadian Blood Supply. Following that report that looked at over one million documents, visited over 9 countries, heard testimony of the sick and the witnesses of those who had passed on from contaminated blood given them, has brought criminal charges to American Corporations, American Doctors, and Canadian Corporations, including non profit like the Red Cross, and Canadian Doctors and Government Officials.  

This is providing due process of law.  And if we have increasing sickness in our society that should be well, it is the duty to do questionnaires in all of the societies coming together to deal with impaired and compromised children and find out if the birth practices, by policies, questionable as to political involvement not best interest of the child or mother, have brought about the pre-disposition for the child to be impaired...whether it is holes in the heart, autism, diabetic condition, MS, CP, there is a common cause, related to them all. It has been said so, for a long time, birth trauma, birth injury.  So what are the doctors doing outside of primal care, natural birth, that is involved in injury to the children, and more common today, as more and more medical persons become agents of collecting the placenta and the placenta blood and endangering the child in that intent.  It is a premeditated intent to clamp a pulsating cord, as well.  

Only if the umbilical cord tore or for placenta previa....should a cord be stopped of its circulating the child's blood, controlled by the child's heart.  The throbbing felt in the cord is the child's heart beat.  Why would any competently and ethical trained medical person interfere with the circulation system? Why would any competently trained medical person even suggest to inject an anemic baby, which can be proven by tests of blood pressure instruments and can test the low count of red and white cells in the child's blood inside the baby.

 What the doctors have tried to do, was take the cord blood, before it entered the baby, and say, see" the blood count was normal here, at this time.  WE don't know why the baby is low in white cells, red cells.  But take a blood count of the placenta blood and you will find all the missing enzymes and hormones that the medical persons and their institutions had a conflict of interest to sell that placenta and the blood contained in it to the highest bidder.  

Research is research, and yes, Medical doctors, need to be paid for their research. It is possible that every article written and published by a medical journal had a fee paid to the researcher for that particular study and that the bonus was in a publisher's right of first publication rights and selling of the article to medical societies.  Where is the protection to the public of concerns of the doctors doing research are not allowed to be made known, and in particular to Drug and Food Authorities and the Health Ministries who have a first duty to protect the public from any endangering side effect of a services or a product.  I did not see this happening on drugs used in maternity care, such on the safety of oxytocin, pitocin, syntocinon, Toesen. The warning was put out by the World Health Organization that this drug damaged babies brains. What women birthing in most nations, particularly, Canada and the United States, were not injected with this drugged that is alleged to stop bleeding.  But it does not stop the bleeding from the torn vessels.  The platelets with the release of serotonin seals the torn vessels.  

This is known in most encyclopedias and good biology textbooks.  Oxytocin is known only to work on muscle contractions.  So the motive of using oxytocin is questionable, that leads to early clamping of the infant's lifeline.  Either case, for a drug reason or causing low blood volume and pressure and low volume of nutrients, the child has been internally injured by the cord clamping.  Then avoid this risk go primal birth, natural birth, and say good bye, forever, to active management as a has-been wrongful birth process.  Only 5 percent of births really need to be by an emergency procedure- c-sections. C-sections are from a safe gentle walk in the park. They carry risk of the flesh eating disease to the other complications of rupture, at any time.  How many of these damaged children, who are immediate cord clamped when they can be removed safely with their placentas and cord not clamped, as a biological reciprocal sealed unit*  are c-section babies.  We must look at everything done to the child during labor, during the birth process, and after birth, to look at all material objectively.

* See T. Peltonen this web site.

1.  Dr. Peltonen's research was written up as Placenta Transfusion - Advantage and Disadvantage.  Euro.  Journal of Pediatrics 1981; 137: 141-146

Note.  There is also a FILM, 1959 :     Clamping Before the First Breath :   I would appreciate receiving a copy of this film if that is possible for educational purposes or perhaps it can be aired on television.

     T. Peltonen:

    "Among early clamped infants, those clamped prior to the first breath can be distinguished as a separate group.  In the Scandinavian congress of physiologists in 1959 we showed a film of the first breath (33).  If the umbilical cord is tied prior to the first breath, the result is a decrease in the size of the heart during the first three or four cardiac cycles.  

    "Then the heart again increases in size, almost to that of the fetal heart.  This change should be interpreted as due to the filling of the opened vascular system of the lungs in connection with aeration, which requires a considerable amount of blood.  If the umbilical circulation is closed, the flow from the caudal caval vein through the via sinistra to the left heart will hardly suffice and for a moment the left heart will not have enough blood (33.34.46).  

    "Usually, however, the condition improves when adequate amounts of blood flow through the lungs to the left atrium (47).

    "On the basis of these observations, it would seem that the closing of the umbilical circulation before the aeration of the lungs has taken place is a highly unphysiological measure, which should thus be avoided .

    "Although the "normal infant" survives without harm, under certain unfavorable conditions the consequences may be fatal.  This view is supported by Landau's observation that the high incidence of IRDS in cesarean section infants was associated with deprivation of placental transfusion due to the usual technique of immediate cord clamping.

    "In order to prevent this, the authors suspended the placenta above the infant in 87 cases of cesarean section.  IRDS was NOT observed in Any Case (28).  Moss et al.  (36) also found an increased incidence of IRDS in premature infants whose cords were clamped before the onset of respiration.

    "The intact umbilical circulation also forms a reserve if the aeration of the lungs fails to begin normally.  Born et al.  (9)  found in animal studies that if the cord is ligated before respiration begins, profound asphyxia results and there is a great increase in blood pressure partly due to asphyxia and partly because the systemic circulation of the limbs is cut off from the low peripheral resistance of the placenta.

    "Working under similar experimental conditions with sheep, we found that the placenta circulation functions as an extracorporeal oxygenator of the blood, should the neonate become asphyxiated (20.47).  the same observations was made by Boda and Guinea pigs (8).  Correspondingly, with human beings we have found that in cesarean section the uterine circulation continues up to the separation of the placenta (5.21).  There is thus good reason in cases of resuscitation to keep the umbilical circulation intact (22)."

OTHER COMMENTS AND LINKS EVIDENCE OF POLITICAL (FINANCIAL INTERESTS FOR MEDICAL PROCEDURES)

Link of political profits is: http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/

______________________________________________________

Comments of Donna Young:

The policies and improvements of various medical societies, colleges and associations have identified political reason of financial self-interest to be the motivating power behind many of the undemocratic policies and vaccinations now imposed on the public.  One issue was the unnecessary circumcision of babies.  This was just done for cosmetic reasons.  The evidence of fact is that the foreskins were sent for use in skin tissue banks. The public cannot see the conflict of interest to compensation paid to the medical institution for providing the organ and blood tissue and/or samples.  However, by criminal Laying of Information of breach of trust and a conspiracy towards any group for uninformed consent and endangering of their persons can reveal by process of law, to get that information of paid compensation to doctors, nurses, and their institution where they worked.

Every increase income is an automatic increase in the governments tax revenue and it is also an increase to the conflict of interest in stocks and shares in medical institutions, cosmetic companies, research labs, and drug companies. We must assume political reasons are behind any imposed medical policy or procedure and where informed choice or right to say no is being taken away from any target group, by age, by sex, by color, by race, by mental or physical disadvantages, or by marital status (this implies the rich vs. the poor).

Links of other references are availabe at:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Prevention is better then a pound of cure:

Petition site:    www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Other links of harm to children by medications (drugging the mother) during birth:

( www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-499.htm   Address by Doris Haire on The Birth Without Boarders Conference, Sponsored by UNICEF in Chiang Mai, Thailand).  Doris Haire was warning Third World Countries not to change over from undrugged natural births (primal births) to (politically controlled) drugged active management of Western Societies. We can see the difference, naturally birthed babies are of a normal healthy color, if white that is pinky-white, but white children, after active managed births (drugged and early cord clamped) are unhealthy yellow-green skin tones and eyes - jaundiced. The active managed children are often revived babies, they often have holes in the heart (heart murmurs) and are anemic. The burden of their care and expense of their special education will fall to the families, in most instances.

Haire's speech indicates the need of caution on drugs and best practice possible is to avoid early umbilical cord clamping and that oxytocins are dangerous to the mother and child, to be avoided.  

Doris Haire's, last known email:   dh@aimsusa.org

http://www.acegraphics.com.au/articles/haire01.html

There are more topics on autism, scanning, episiotomy, circumcision which can be found by scrolling down the list of contents at:   www.lotusbirth.com