Autism Increased in Quebec, Canada
Autism has increased in Quebec Canada. concerns of Donna Young of Natural Birth Education. (Revised, February 29, 2004)
Quebec has cord stem cell blood banks. Most medical universities train only for their medical students to learn about immediate cord clamping and taking the baby's stem cell blood and other nutrients deprived the child by denying the child from 20 to 60 percent total blood volume. This results in 1 in 16 Canadian babies, knowingly having to be revived today, according to Canadian research. See link to references.
Most children, for political reasons are being immediate umbilical cord clamped. It is a financial
interest. The baby's blood
property, their nutrients and stem cells are sold to the highest bidder. Many parents are not
told the placenta-blood is necessary
to transfuse from the placenta to the child's now expanding lungs. Any oxygen debt to the brain results
in a compromised child.
Immedicate cord clamping (ICC) may be the cause of increased autism in Quebec, and likely the common
factor of all children
with any disorder, many of them latent to show up.
If this be true as the probable cause of autism in Quebec, immediate cord clamping (ICC), it will
be true in all Canadian
Provinces, and world wide. See the Petition for prevention at the end for prevention of
autism and all other internal disorders in
children today.
Research at some autism websites state a 900 percent increase in this autistic brain disorder. It
is logical that medical caused
low blood volume and pressure and lack of oxygen to the brain are contributing factors to any susceptible
child with a proven
history of genetic disorders in his/her family. Contributing but needless risk factors are over and
above natural disorders and can
be compensated in civil courts, if not also in criminal courts for medical malpractice and unnecessary
risk taking.
See the facts
of the Story below, in red,
AUTISM SKYROCKETS IN QUEBEC: A SECRET NO MORE
.
These are the preceding
comments of that article by a volunteer Birth Educator, Donna Young, of Natural Birth Education.
(www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-546.htm) Home page:
www.lotusbirth.com
In Quebec, Canada, are many private cord blood banks. The cord blood banks,
privately owned, are encouraging the
harvesting of the babies by immediate and early umbilical cord clamping. The blood banks and their
labs can get 1/2 cup of
blood to one cup of blood per child. That amounts to up to 50 percent total blood volume, as acknowledged
by the Society of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC). They are directly involved by education
policies directing early and
immediate cord clamping on all Canadian babies. Why did they allow this unless they are profiting
by selling the stem cells
deprived the newborn owner infant of legal protection and security of person? Many of these so
called experts also profit by
sitting on the boards of societies working to assist the damage children but they are not involved in
investigative prevention by
false and harmful medical policies endangering any one child.
Most Medical University are also involved in research and are educating their
nurses and doctors and midwives to harvest
babies by immediate cord clamping, following the clinical policies directed by SOGC and ACOG. Internal
injuries such as autism
will be the logical consequences of false medical policies allowed by every College of Physicians and
Surgeons that were
contracted to protect the public, and failed in that capacity. Each Provincial, State or Territorial
government can fire such
reckless care and attention of allowance of endangering practices and policies as to the privilege of
the medical societies being
self-governing. If they can't correct and discipline their senior members who make such policies
how did they expect to protect
the public? Such memberships are not being accountable to the public in addressing concerns of
policies. There is obvious
indifference and silence when any one member of society ask them questions on ethics, the law and medicine
and clinical
practice and specific policies.
The burden of costs to raise this damaged children will
be to the sleeping and unaware taxpayers. The burden will be in
higher specialized education costs and in increased medical costs. This cost will involve expensive
experimental drugs of
damaged children. Many now drug addicted and many with suicidal behavior patterns. The drugging
of these damaged children
shy of hormones that calm the brain and cell activity are from childhood to the end of their lives.
Many these victimized children
will never be independent or know marriage or raising their own child.
This harvesting of babies is a billion dollar free-enterprise
business concealed and covered up by the politicians. Why?
They, the government, make money off a billion dollar medical business, and do not make a dollar on
well persons or blue ribbon
babies. When letters go to Health Canada, on this issue, they play blind, deaf and dumb. Why? The politicians also play this
game extremely well, saying they hired the Colleges in each Province to protect the public but fail
to investigate the breach of
trust of that duty.
This harvesting of babies requires criminal investigating
and charges ought to be taken on all medical persons involved in
the false training of the current medical persons, including the ambulance medics. It may apply to those
government officials in
charge of education K-12, and in continuing education as to false information contained in most biology
textbooks.
If we can have criminal medical charges on key political
figures and medical doctors in the RCMP Blood Task Force, this
harming of the newborn citizen deserves no less investigation in each community. Laying of
Information of criminal
violations to any baby is best done by any individual in the city that they live in. It is
done by laying of information, siting the
criminal code and the person or persons involved at the community hospital where the child was born.
The concerned citizen with such knowledge name those
involved. Those likely to be named are the newly trained doctors,
and nurses and as well as the older doctors getting in on the selling of the placenta and placenta blood
for personal gain and
profit. It can involve doctors coming from other nations to work in Canada.
No hospital or medical person does not collect an organ
and preserve it in the cooler for no financial compensation. Either
the doctors are contributing to fund raising of the hospital, or they are profiting of some nature,
themselves.
The nurses are keeping their positions by silence, no
doubt. If true, this is in violation of their code of ethics and standards
and duty of training. They are not paid by the doctors, but by the medical plans of each Province. The nurses would be in
violation of duty if they failed to make a fault report of any endangering practices being taught them
by any nurse instructor in
maternity matters, or in any textbook, or the absence of truthful teaching on the placenta and blood
and transfusion into the child's
expanding lungs.
The failure of nurses to make a fault report on what
they observed a medical persons doing means they are no longer an
expert witness but an accomplice to a crime and the destroying of evidence. They saw and had a
duty to report the interrupting
the umbilical cord or the reviving a child off his/her own means of revival on the umbilical cord for
continuation of blood volume
and pressure to the child's expanding lungs, once the child is breathing again. The volume and
pressure of maintained steady
oxygenated blood flow is also a protection to the heart valves and assures the sealing up of the ductus
arteriosus and the
foramen ovale. The increase of holes in the heart are a matter of early umbilical cord clamping
by the logic the child is anemic by
low blood volume and pressure.
PAY OFF IN $30,000 FOR THE FINDERS OF STEM CELL MATCHES:
An ounce of stem cells may well be received in a finder's fee of the blood type match $30,000. This is the amount on the internet alleged to be the amount paid by Australia for stem cells purchased from other Nations. This was true until Australia, too, began to harvest their own babies, in such questionable training and practices of harvesting without true informed consent of the natural parent. Their midwives and nurses and doctors need to be investigated as to their training, there, as well in every Nation.
EACH NATION HAS CRIMINAL LAWS ON ENDANGERING A NEWBORN CHILD OR ANY CITIZEN:
The children, the living victims of assault, battery, do live. Victims do not need to die to have criminal investigation of endangering to them. The babies, while looking okay, are weaker and with latent internal damages, ranging from autism that is often observed at a later time period. This is not by any test but by observation the child is not progressing satisfactorily in some area of development. The birth process can be traced to the child afflicted with any internal disorder or disease to be a victim by being taken off the umbilical cord, almost instantly. The witness are the mother, and in some instances, the father or another relative or friend of the family. Any birth witness is in an ideal place to file a Writ for civil damages to the child, in the child's name. They are within their legal rights to file a criminal Laying of Information, even if the parents refused to do that -- protect their own child from violations of human rights of equal security of person, at birth.
ENDANGERING MEDICAL BULLETINS AND POLICIES:
The policies of directing mischievous medical malpractice can be found at the SOGC's Policy web site, and up to 2002, at ACOG's, the medical experts that direct and govern all other medical persons to their expert clinical practices and education bulletins.
The hasty clamping on the baby, was in most cases, a
surprise of the unsuspecting and uneducated mother and father of
the child. They could not protect their baby. They had no prior knowledge of the intent of the doctor,
who make up alibis for the
reason they interfered with a functioning organ, by clamping off the blood flow. To be able to
protect their baby, the natural
guardians of the child, the mother and the father needed a signed birth contract of no risk taking
and what cannot be done to the
baby or the mother. Suggestions of such a contract are found at this website, www.lotusbirth.com
Only the mother can change the signed contract for the
care to herself and her baby. Why was that the parents were not
told the intent of the doctor to clamp the cord and for a variety of false reasons? The truth
is only if the cord tore if for placenta
previa might a cord be interfered with by tying it off while it is pulsating, followed by correction
of oxygenated blood immediately
to the now endangered child.
Why were the legal guardians of the child not
informed of the intent of the doctor to surprise them with immediate clamping
on their baby, whether full term, a c-section baby, or a premature baby? The facts are, "all"
babies, however born, wherever born,
need all their blood transfused from the placenta to the child's expanding lungs. This is true
and logical, if the baby is not to suffer
internal damages of any kind, or leading to a pre-disposition or susceptibility to such injury, triggered
or increased to the risk by
hasty clamping of a functioning organ, the umbilical cord, the sustainer of life. The cord is
the go-between of oxygenated blood,
volume and pressure to the child's organ, the placenta to the child's internal organs, such as the heart,
lungs, and brain, liver, and
spleen, and kidneys. Even a diabetic problem can be triggered by early clamping and interruption
of natural hormones that are in
the blood by lost by early cord clamping. Who is to say the child, after short-changed at birth
will ever recreate the same
protection taken away at birth, needlessly.
The freshest oxygen supply goes directly to the brain,
by the placenta vein into the baby's internal vein. The brain is in the
most need of oxygenated blood never stopped for any amount of time. The brain of all organs and
muscles is the most
vulnerable for any damage should oxygen and blood volume be cut off for any amount of time, seconds,
to minutes. The child
may well live, but, damaged, never then having all potential genius cells and ease of learning as intended
by natural design. That
is not a child that was allowed to be born equal with full potential ... it was handicapped and needlessly
risked to subtle to serious
impairments. That is most unfair and the Courts are best to deal with this issue of medical malpractice
that is criminal in nature --
reckless disregard to the child's rights of equal protection and security of person.
We must raise this issue of endangering by the Laying
of Information to a Judge for a hearing and trial of all medical
persons involved and Administration staff and Ethics Committees at all hospitals. Who is most
able to do this but the parents of
the endangered child. A child does not have to die to be protected from the risk of endangering. The child need not show
outward damage to have been endangered by having its own blood volume and pressure stopped by a clamp,
needlessly.
Again, only if the cord tore or for placenta previa ought the cord have been clamped at all, if ever. See Laying of Information on
the internet. It is not that hard to do. You do not need a lawyer, you simply go to a Justice
of the Peace and make a sworn
statement what you know about the risk taking to any baby or babies in your town.
This story, web site given for more information, merits
your full attention and concern and participation to protect all babies,
world wide.
AUTISM SKYROCKETS IN QUEBEC: A SECRET NO MORE
By RFD Columnist, Dr. F. Edward Yazbak
TL Autism Research
Falmouth, Massachusetts
E-mail:
tlautstudy@aol.com
According to McGill University Professor Eric Fombonne, the prevalence rate of autistic disorders has
risen to 60 per 10,000
individuals [1 in 167]. For decades, such a rate was estimated to be 2 to 5 per 10,000 [1 in 5,000 to
1 in 2,000].
In 2003, the number of individuals with Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD) under the
age of 20 was
estimated at 10,500 in the Province of Quebec and 45,000 in Canada.
For the last 5 years, I have extensively researched the recent spectacular increase in autism and PDD
and have been convinced
that the most accurate statistics on those syndromes are those obtained from school records, because
neither parents nor
school authorities are likely to accept such a diagnosis lightly. Graph I shows the increase in cases
of autism in Quebec in the
last decade.
Graph I
Children with Autism Registered in The Province of Quebec Schools
1990-1991 to 1999-2000
Source: Quebec Education Ministry.
The 150% increase in all age groups, although considerable, hardly describes the seriousness of the
situation facing the
province. When one looks at the number of cases of autism in the different educational levels in Quebec
schools [Table I], the
ominous reality becomes evident: The percentage of preschoolers with autism is almost double that of
students in primary
grades and quadruple that of students in secondary grades, a clear indication that younger children
are being diagnosed in
increasing numbers.
Table I
Children with Autism by Educational Level Through The Nineties
Province of Quebec
Source: Quebec Education Ministry.
Some may argue that this was partly due to better and earlier diagnosis. Though this may be true, the
sad and uncontestable fact
remains, that in the last decade, the number of young children with autistic disorders accessing the
system and requiring
specialized educational services has risen dramatically.
The limited resources of the Provincial Education Ministry were further strained in the last three years.
A total of 1388 students
with pervasive developmental disorders were registered in schools in the Province of Quebec in September
of 2000, compared
to 2267 in September of 2002, an increase of 63% in two years.This accelerating growth, for a group
of disabilities that was
minuscule just a few years ago, is at last attracting everyone’s attention. Autism is not a secret anymore.
According to the Montreal School Commission, there were 42 classrooms for children with autism and PDD
in the city in 2003,
compared to only 1 in 1989. There were 91 students with autism in Montreal schools in 1998 compared
to 307 in 2003, an
increase of 237% in 5 years or an average of over 47% a year. A clear explanation of why the yearly
increase in the number of
affected children in Montreal is 44% higher than the provincial average is not possible with the presently
available data.
The following analysis can illustrate the increase in autistic disorders in the Province of Quebec in
the last thirty years.
In 2003, the estimated population Canada was approximately 31.4 million inhabitants of whom, 25.1% were
under the age of 19,
divided as follows:
0-4 years 5.4% (5.6-5.2)
5-9 years 6.3% (6.6-6.1)
10-14 years 6.7% (7.5-6.5)
15-19 years 6.7% (6.9-6.4)
The approximate population of Quebec was slightly less than 7.5 million last year compared to slightly
over 6 million in 1971.
Presuming that parameters are the same, one can estimate that
there were between 300 and 400 individuals with autistic disorders in the province in 1971 compared
to over 10,000 now. [See
Table II.]
The most conservative evaluation should show that the increase in autistic disorders in Quebec has probably
exceeded 3000%
in the last 30 years. In other words, the number of cases of autistic disorders in the province doubled
every 6-7 years. It is unlikely
that any other childhood disease entity has increased at the same rate.
Though school data from other provinces are not available for comparison, there is every reason to suspect
that similar
spectacular increases in autistic disorders are challenging school resources everywhere.
NEXT Full report at:
http://www.redflagsweekly.com/conferences/autism/2004_jan25.html
Reply to the above article, February 11, 2004 by Donna Young:
Autism is just one of the many disorders being caused by immediate umbilical cord clamping. This
is a practice that should be
having criminal charges laid against the policy makers of clinical practice and training, such as to
the Society of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) and ACOG, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Both these expert societies and colleges directed immediate cord clamping on all babies and did so knowingly
that it deprived
the children imposed of 50 percent of total blood volume. These experts, along with hospital ethics
boards, knowingly were
allowing the placentas to be drained and the blood used and sold to the highest bidders.
In some cases, legal experts approved of taking the organ and contents without informed parental consent,
adding to breach of
trust and breaches of privacy as all organs and blood contain genetic information. This was a form of
privacy invasion of the
individual's rights and parental rights to protect their child.
The placenta were being sold to the highest bidders and the placenta, after being drained for stem cell
blood spun from the other
substances of the human blood. The drug and cosmetic and burn skin tissue blood banks were in
on the receiving end of the
placentas and contents. The facts of placentas being sold are in many biology textbooks, since the 1980's,
to the current
publications of 2003 and 2004. See references of such at
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
Criminal Endangering to Infants Harvested for placenta blood, called cord blood.
The violation to the child was robbing the baby to be born equal, with equal chance to be normal and
not have learning and
behavior problems which are caused by lack of volume and pressure of oxygenated blood to the brain and
the subsequent
nutrients contained in the blood.
Any individual can check their area's criminal code and find endangering to the child and name the doctor
and his trainer and
university and his College of Physician and Surgeon group that licensed them in that State, Territory
or Province. Look up
Criminal Codes in your area or Nation.
The charges can be taken on for any nurse or midwife that participated and failed to do a fault report
of any medical person or
persons, including surgeons at c-sections that clamped a pulsating cord and did not allow the natural
removal of the placenta with
the child and not to clamp or cut the cord, for hours later with informed choice, if the cord was detached
at all.
It is a criminal violation to destroy evidence which nurses were doing on this issue of destroying the
facts of the placenta
condition, its weight and amount of blood drained by the labs of each hospital, sometimes with the nurses
participating. See
Placenta photo at
www.lotusbirth.com
PIONEERS DID NOT HARVEST THEIR BABIES - CONSEQUENTLY, THEY HAD BLUE RIBBON BABIES:
Prior to about 1914, most home birthed babies were natural births, no drugs and the placenta was simply
put into a diaper, not
tied or cut. The placenta dried and the child was healthy with no low immunities and was healthy
of full blood volume and
pressure. They were blue ribbon babies that are alive today, and most of their marriages are 65
years and over, whereas, their
children have died and have divorced, not taking the distresses of our times as were these pioneer babies
born in natural birth in
the homes.
We must get back to learning what is natural birth education and practice. It is simple. The mother
births in warm water and
catches her own baby and does not tie off or cut the cord. The baby is kept warm and the mother
too.
The placenta is born naturally, without drugs. No cutting of the mother's body is done, nor to the child's so no infections get into the mother's
blood stream; nor the child's.
Natural Birth is simple, but "active management" manipulates the child's delivery time by
drugs, first Demerol, that is a form of
morphine that slows the labor down, unnaturally; and then the mother is told she is failing to progress,
and is given man-made
oxytocin, that endangers the child to extreme and harsh and close together contractions. The child
gets little oxygen and red cells
die, causing iron overload and jaundice. The cord is clamped, causing less volume and pressure,
so little oxygen gets to the
child's brain. We then have internal injuries, while the child appears normal in all external
appearances. The internal damages to
the brain and organs are slow in detection, taking in some cases until the child is of school age, or
from ages 2 to 12, sometimes
older, before the birth damage is fully considered.
Mothers can get the birth records at any time. It is wise to file a Writ in the
child's name. This can be done as soon as the logic of birth damage is a probability by the needless
endangering of the child, at
birth.
Other dangers during active management are a closed birth canal caused by the birth canal kept closed
by flat on the back and
semi-sitting birth positions. Upright, standing, squatting birth positions are most normal and
allow for faster transfusion of the
blood. Warmest room possible, and ideally, a warm water birth do not cause shock of cold air,
that stops the blood transfusion
as effectively as the cold steel of a clamp.
Other dangers are injections and cutting of the mother's body. Any breaking of the skin allows
for a tiny germ to cause a blood
infection or virus that can settle in the brain tissues and remain in the blood. It may surface with
any endangering to the body, or
minor injury. Therefore, taking blood samples by needle insertions to the mother or injections
into the child are a threat to them.
HEART DAMAGE CAN BE CAUSED BY EARLY UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING:
Holes in the heart by low blood volume and pressure (caused by ICC and ECC) may not even be detected until a death of a child occurs, or even to an appearance of a heart attack to adults at age 30...then the hole of the heart is revealed, there since birth. There from birth because of lack of volume and pressure by deprivation of 1/2 cup of blood to 1 cup of blood; or 50 percent or more of total blood volume of blood. The windows of the heart (the foramen ovale and the ductus arteriosus) did not seal or close by low blood volume and pressure, that is logical.
The baby was endangered and this was criminal assault not yet dealt with in our courts of law for endangering
to any one person,
a member of the public. Early clamping and placenta blood robbing is the best concealed medical secret
for the last 200 years.
This is when Dr. Erasmus Darwin warned doctors, the ethical ones, who would follow the rule,
no harm done, "Do not tie off a
pulsating cord, or otherwise, the child will be made weaker and more blood will be in the placenta that
otherwise ought to have
been in the child." 1801, E. Darwin. His report was stated by another concerned medical person,
Dr. Mavis Gunther, England, in
1957. Reports from 1967 are of nursing knowing that the placentas were being drained and the blood
used in transplants. This
was the statement of the nursing chair person of the Kamloop's University College of the Cariboo (UCC),
Penny Heaslip,
B.Sc.N., M.Ed, School of Nursing. I requested that students have instruction of ethics, the law
(criminal and civil) and competency
in training of the placenta's purpose and the transfusion of the placenta blood into the child's expanding
lungs, to maintain proper
volume and pressure by not clamping off the supply of blood or pressure.
Do you remember who E. Darwin was? E. Darwin was the first of that family to encourage survival
of the fittest, the book written
by his
grandson, Charles. So what mixed messages might we have in his warning how to stop a risk or how to gather blood for research and from whose baby? This has been going on and undetected by the police who are failing since that time to the present day to make arrests for endangering any one baby, regardless, of the child's sex, race, religion of the family, or social status or marriage status of the mother of the child.
Thank you for a reply of my concerns and to visit these suggested web sites:
www.cordclamping.com ; (here at this site, see the history of cord clamping - when done on a pulsating cord it is most endangering to the child.
Sincerely,
Donna Young, President of Natural Birth Education
Box 504
Dawson Creek, BC V1G 4H4 Canada
tel/fax: 1-250-782-9223
dyoung@pris.ca
________________________
Please sign the Petition to Protect the Canadian Babies. The USA have protected the USA babies by cancelling Policy #216, ACOG, November 1995 as of January 2002. They did not make this public nor warn other Nations of wrongfully drained medical persons, including nurses and midwives now collecting blood by following immediate cord clamping procedures.
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
contact: Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother
Home: www.lotusbirth.com
References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
A medical web site to visit:
Prevention of internal disorders and learning disabilities:
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
Contact:
dyoung@pris.ca
