Petition: Protect Babies and Mothers, Too

Petition: "Protect Babies and Mothers, Too" by Donna Young, Volunteer Medical Researcher

(www.lotusbirth.com/FEB2003Lotusbirth-540.htm)

Petition Link : www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/120580814

This Petition (with links for more information below) seeks for protection to the Canadian Babies by those who wish to assist and help by intervention of protesting a harm done, and an injustice going unopposed by our political leaders and by the officers of the justice system, at present.

The children in Canada are not the only babies threatened to be violated by constitutional and criminal code violation by being harvested of their placenta blood. The facts are the immediate and early umbilical cord clamping is a world wide problem. The breach of trust to almost every parent, and suspected for the last 3 and 4 generations, has been a known within the medical community a political conspiracy of secrecy. This involves the hospitals that permit the selling of the placentas and the use of the placenta blood for their own labs research or being sent to larger labs. Compensation can be verified by invoices of handling organs and blood and income received. Compensation can be verified of the doctors income to, for any external billings in his or her handling of organs and blood to private enterprise transplant hospitals, those involved in medical research of stem cells, and to cosmetic companies and drug companies. The later can grind up the placenta organ for extracting enzymes, hormones and other components of cells and blood.

Private enterprise has set up what are called cord blood banks, and the baby's blood can within 36 hours be in another area of the world. Private billings and collections are being approved, and finders fees of a special type of stem cells, may even bring a reward up to $30,000. This was the amount Australia was paying to do transplants with stem cells.

The fees for services involving a stem cell transplant costs about $130,000 and the $30,000 is the fee paid to the person (s) to find the stem cell match. Such a fee for the collection of stem cells of a particular match, say Russian and /or Italian, or a mix of those ancestry bloods, have cost, for example, Australia $30,000, until they, too, began to harvest their own babies, and unknown to the mothers birthing in that Nation, or in any Nation. Wherever harvesting of babies is going on it is a breach of trust and duty of equal protection to the child and equal security of person. I dare say it is a criminal violation, as well as a Constitutional duty to the child.

The medical persons doing experiments in stem cell transplants are now seeking not just blood types, of ABO, but want to be more specific of matching mixed marriage blood. Therefore, even mixed nationalities, as mentioned, like Italian and Russian mixed marriages are of interest in stem cell matches. Russian blood matches may be prime for the continued need of those who have been exposed to radiation. Oriental blood was stated as being in need, and mixes of colored and white races.

NO INFORMED CHOICE OF THE TRAINING AND PREMEDITATED INTENT OF YOUR DOCTOR:

Most of the policies and training of the doctors, nurses and midwives, today, including ambulance medics are alibis. The directives in any textbook, including biology textbooks see (www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm) directing immediate cord clamping on all human babies are contributing to directing a harmful practice to a human child and the author, publisher and the committees selecting that content must, I believe, be held accountable for mischief and endangering to any one person.

These policies being actively used as an alibi to avoid likely criminal accountability implies your baby who may be targeted at the very first time you are told you are pregnant for the baby's stem cell worth.

MOTHERS MAY BE UNETHICAL TO BE SELLING, SECRETLY, THEIR BABY'S PLACENTA AND PLACENTA BLOOD:

This placenta blood may be be valued more then the value of the life of the child by those involved in questionable services, for fees for services. In a birth of premature child, who have more stem cells then do full term, it was the likely motive of a New York mother arranging she would birth one month early. It was known she had planned before hand, early cord clamping to bank the child's blood. She then went on a holiday, in high altitudes and had vigorous sex. Sure enough, her baby was on the way, prematurely. She likely was being compensated by a rich relative. She would have banked the placenta blood taken by agreement by her medical doctor, with a waiver to the doctor and hospital and it would be sent to the blood bank. There, once in storage, she could give it to any relative, at her will. The compensation would be under the table. This is the perfect crime of harvesting babies for profit, even of your own blood. It is unethical, of course. But the governments of today, world wide, may have a conflict of interest in the higher cost of education and medicine brings them too, higher returns in tax revenue. The Nation is losing the best potential of our children, the future of tomorrow, for profit and creed. The duty of all is not one hair on the child's head shall be harmed. If the child is harmed God's will is yet to come on judgement of those allowing this scam of blood taken from the infant child.

FEARS OF THE MEDICAL PERSONS CAUSING ABORTIONS:

The desire for stem cells from aborted babies, also give motives to scans, unncessary and suggested taken for curiosity not a matter of health. But a reason can always be planted in the mother's mind, of a doctor saying, he she fears this or that...created doubt that the mother is motivated to scan her baby, and risk damages to developing cells.

This fear from the "interpretation" of the scan (no right or wrong can be proven) may take advantaged of a fearful older woman, who cannot see or know the interpretation or the honesty of it, may, by suggestion, she may be carrying a damaged child. Then, in distress, aborts her unwise healthy baby. This has happened. Women out fear of a damaged child actually aborted a perfectly healthy baby. She may have been selected for a scan to work on her fears for a child desired for stem cell cultivation of particular cells, brain, heart, lung. The cells from each of those areas then cultivated in a petri-dish. The rest of the embryo or fetus ground up for enzymes and hormones and specific components of blood, white cells, red cells, plasma, and so forth. This is all very gross but not past comprehension it is being done, has been done, and concealed at all levels of government, from our own community hospitals and from our own trusted doctors and nurses. One nurse, who instructs student nurses stated to me, if she were called on a local investigation she could testify under oath, that back in 1967, she was aware of the collection of placentas for harvesting. It is not a new awareness to those involved but are forced to be in a gag order of what is actually going on in each community hospital.

How do you prove a person is unethical on such matters, so the warning of caution is, who can one trust? All the community hospital committees are appointed, not elected. So they are possibly appointed to work within a system with gag orders.

One can only trust oneself and avoid scans, in the first place. What can be done, other than abort the child, so scans lead to abortion, in many situations. Avoid scanning unless the mother trusts in her own instincts something is wrong and not to do routine scanning. The more high tech accepted on the embryo and fetus means the risk of invasion of the child's space.

We are dealing with some medical people who are different in the searing of conscience and ethics as they manipulate on the fears of a trusting mother not confident in such medical matters and trusts not her own body to birth a healthy child.

How is harvesting done? The placentas full of the baby's deprived blood are drained through the cord. (Link to a full placenta is provided below). Thus, the name, cord blood. This name, cord blood, suggests in the mind that only a tad of blood is being deprived the baby at the birth. This is false and misleading to the public, at large. The babies are being deprived between 20 to 50 percent total blood volume. The nurses manual states if full delayed clamping is allowed the baby, actually, 60 percent total blood volume is transfused into the babies expanding lungs. (See reference links below).

The babies, called neonates at birth, are being victims. It is a criminal offense, not having yet a test case. This harvesting of their placenta blood for stem cells, is the number one threat of endangering to the child's well being. This is as scientists seek to cure the internal illness that probably began with immediate cord clamping, in the first place. A child with low blood volume has a faster beating heart, and likely their brain and nervous system cells are going to ware out before they are of 100 years of age, so earlier death is to the child that is early clamped at birth. They will look normal, but the medical societies profit by the spin offs of internal illness. Millions of persons diabetic, have heart problems, learning and behavior problems are associated with damage at birth, needlessly. Best practice possible in birth and least risk of harm is keeping to the natural, not active management. Warm water births keep the baby from cold air shock. No clamping of the cord, assures the child of full blood immunities, and no cutting of the cord assures the baby of no germ or virus getting into their blood stream.

Thank you for investigating this issue. Please pass the following links to any one planning a family. All teenagers should be informed. The links are from references of research of some four years.

The Petition is addressed to The Queen, and the Attorney General of Canada, and the Attorney Generals of all the Provinces of Canada and their two Territories.

I encourage similar Petition in your own communities and the United Nations to be contacted on the breach of trust to the child, a duty of all adults to protect the baby from any risk of endangering. Some babies do die, and are not investigated if a "licensed" medical persons attended their birth and trained in the art of early umbilical cord clamping, set by policies, that have not being, as yet, taken before a Court of Law, as possible directing a harmful medical malpractice by those carrying out the instructions of false hospital board policies, and policies set by experts, such as:

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, as Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89, May 2000, directing medical persons clamping the baby's functioning organ, while it is yet, red, firm, and pulsating. The early clamping then leads to the babies being harvested for the trapped in the placenta blood, and taken without informed consent of the legal guardian of the child, the parents. Nor, of their right to know no clamping of the cord is a medical need, but merely cosmetic, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa.

SOGC followed the now retired American Policy by ACOG, Policy #216, November 1995, retired in January 2002, but retired without a statement to the public and retraining doctors falsely trained to clamp a cord for taking a mere pH test. PH tests can be done by urine samples and no clamping or cutting of a segment of the umbilical cord need be done. Not even for PKU tests, which, can, if consented to be done by urine tests which does not have to be done at the time of birth. PKU tests, I am told can be done at anything, if parents want to have known if they have a genetic disorder. Such information, if known, in advance, may interfere with medical insurance plans.

This early cord clamping, has been known since 1801 to be harmful to children, first acknowledged by the survival of the fittest doctor, Dr. Erasmus Darwin. The children can be targeted and or selected to have their blood taken for science, research, and transplants, based on color, race, sex, social status of the family, faith, and the possible type of blood sought, and the child being of that blood type. Ethics be darned...when profits are to be had. The parents would never guess their medical doctor had concealed intentions of care. Nor, that appropriate discarding of the placenta was selling the placenta to drug companies and cosmetic companies for the value of the hormones to be extracted.

The early clamping has been a conspiracy of secrecy to the members of the public. The medical persons have been doing overwhelming research. The evidence fact of the volume of blood deprived the child is in the placentas that are early clamped...the blood trapped in them denied the child. This is a failure to provide equal protection and equal security of person.

The blood taken, by draining off the placenta, is never recorded on the child's medical charts, nor the timing of the cord clamped and the position of the baby's body when born, when clamped.

The condition of the cord if the baby's head is born, and the cord clamped, is firm, red, and pulsating. Proper care and treatment is patience, that is waiting for the placenta to be expelled and all pulsation in the cord ceased before any cosmetic removal of the cord is agreed to by the parent(s).

We must ask, "Why are the nurses being blind and failing to speak out on this as assault, and battery and in some cases, murder or attempted murder on the child?" The nurses have the first power to refuse to participate and see that the facts of the care and treatment were always given to the parents, in case legal protection of the child was later needed for any latent disorders of disruption to the child's circulation system, being low blood volume, anemic, and in some cases, caused iron overload. The length of time for the child to remake their deprived blood is between 6 weeks and 6 months, it all depends on how much blood was deprived the child.

The nurses silence and failure to record the facts as they seen them, or participated in the assistance of this care and treatment to the child, removes them from being a mere witness, and they are perceived to be an accessory to a crime, before and after the fact, in most instances.

LINKS:

References of statements in the Petition can be found at:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Dr. Sarah Buckley has given me a Sworn Declaration, which I have put up on

the internet, at: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-314.htm

Her poem, demonstrates simply the importance of the placenta, called Ode to

My Placenta, link:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-449.htm

The evidence of damage of brain impairments was addressed years ago, back in

the 1960's, with an Educator writing a book, The Magical Child, pages 48-50,

by Joseph Chilton Pearce, demonstrating brain lesions by drugs during labor

and by early umbilical cord clamping. He quoted factual research of a