Birth Contract

The birth contract below, is in draft form and is to be individualized.

Revised March 13, 2004 at 11:45 pm.  This Url:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-537.htm

The birth contract is provided as suggestions to be discussed with a qualified medical person, ethical and competently trained in the facts of the human creation.

The Birth Contract serves only as a suggestion and as a guide of possibly what cannot be done to the mother's person or to her body, to give birth to a child.  Yes, this means she legally can prevent herself from being cut (episiotomy or a c-section), or being offered drugs, of any kind.  Many harmful drugs, like oxytocin are alleged to stop bleeding.  That is questionable if they stop bleeding or increase the risk of it by harsher contractions.  

It is the woman's own decision to make her "own" factually informed decision.  She may want to have a primal birth contract, to birth unassisted in the hospital, with her own birth aids, and call an expert's help, only if and when the mother asks for help.  

THE WOMAN'S BODY IS HER OWN, AND NOT THE STATE'S DECISION WHAT IS DONE TO HER BODY, OR THE BABY'S:

Pregnancy is a natural state of a woman's reproduction system.  It is NOT a mental condition, just because some persons, medical doctors, politicians, and so forth, think a woman is insane, for not listening to what they want her to accept and blindly accept,  to their suggestions. Women, have for too long, have had to go along without second opinions, and many were cut and exploited simply because they had trusted, and not asked questions.  

NO FORM OF DISCRIMINATION OF ANY KIND TO THE WOMEN'S DECISIONS AND INFORMED CHOICES THAT CANNOT BE MADE BY THREAT OR PRESSURE -- AS THAT MAY BE TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, A POLITICAL CAUSE OF HIGHER PROFITS OF MEDICAL SERVICES, IMPOSED ON HER OR SOCIETY IN CHILD BIRTH:

It seems only a man need never ever have to visit or see a doctor.  But, it seems, a woman's decision of what can or cannot be done to her body, when pregnant, becomes a man's domain too. That is not fair.  He may suggest. The choice is the woman's. To be otherwise, is a form of discrimination to the woman's individual choice as a independent person, self-ruled.

It seems, this control over the woman's own body-domain may be challenged by a court of law.  Again, so be it.  Women must, if they must, have their own revolution to regain control of what is or is not done to their person in child birth.  At no other time is woman more vulnerable.  At this time, woman must be supported by all for true informed choices and risks factually told to her, and not by deceit or pressure, to submit to active management or a c-section.  It is today, a cost of a drugged birth to cause women and the children born by active management a USA dollar cost of $20,000, and that is not a c-section birth.  That is the use of drugs in labor and in induction of labor. That has produced women with later thyroid problems, and the child, too, and higher medical costs to try to fix the sick child, displaying trauma and evidence of radiation sickness, yet, the mothers not knowingly accepting exposure to radiation in childbirth by chemicals, tools, or whatever, their babies are being caused to be ill, after active management births.  Perhaps, it is the immediate vaccinations that are the cause of radiation-form-of sicknesses babies are suffering from.  Tests of such nature are not being done on drugs, vaccinations, and tools used in maternity care of the mother and the child. Why not? !!!

It is an expecting mother's right to, again, to expect no form of discrimination of any kind, involving her own informed choices on how, or where, or with whom, the woman shall give birth, and to have control over primal birth rights vs. active management. Otherwise, any imposed control on her body, and against her will, must be considered itself, an attempted murder, bodily assault, threat, and battery, as to any touching or drugging or the pressure to scan her body, when she has said, "No."  To impose is a form of rape and rape cannot be imposed on any person's body, no matter who is behind the mask, the man in the street or the medical person(s).

In Pregnancy, women, has the right, only, with God's blessing, to choose how she will birth, man's way, or primal God's Way, and to choose if God is using in some situation's,  man's knowledge and skill, in those 3 to 5 percent special situations, that true c-sections are a benefit.  (See news story, March 12, 2004 on woman charged for death of one twin for refusing a c-section, when first suggested).

The mother is the master of her own body. The Human Rights Declaration, since 1948 to the present date and the statement of no form of discrimination to women, allows the individual to be a self-determinater. This means, women, are in control, of informed choices, and not any policies of government agency. Or, their licensed medical doctors, or nurses.  

The right of the individual is informed choice and to know they can say no, or use the courts should they feel threatened by any organization of standard clinical studies to be imposed on them, without means of a waiver to decline such care and treatment, at any time, notification is given. And, or to change one's mind in acceptance of care and treatment, the choice being the individual's.

It goes without saying that pregnancy is not a medical state, nor a mental sickness. Pregnancy is a natural condition that has been agreed to acceptance of choice of women to use her body with her natural abilities to reproduce as to her child-bearing abilities and capacities to nurture and care for her offspring and duty to protect them as best she can by being informed of factual information.  Nothing, then must be withdrawn or left out for her means to make an informed decision.  This includes a primal conclusion of the baby's birth, no clamping off the umbilical cord, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa.

    Note:  A Petition involving a challenge to Active Management vs Natural Birth Education and Practice follows the Birth Contract, at the end of this article.

A SUGGESTED BIRTH CONTRACT

from Natural Birth Education

Donna Young

BIRTH CONTRACT (Individualized) Keep to one page if possible.  The contract to be binding should be witnessed.  The primary care giver must sign the contract, that can be the head nurse and the doctor on the ward, or the family doctor, or all involved, or all involved in the birth given a copy.  

    a) Teas suggested in child birth are Red Raspberry tea, taken very strong, and taken when labor contractions are steady.

    b) Shepherd's purse is for after the birth of the baby, alleged to reduce bleeding. No inductions are advised because most babies know when to come and when they are properly turned. Inductions often cause cutting of the women's body or c-sections. Normal gestations have been up to the 10 month.

4) The mother will not have any drugs during labor. These include man-made hormones called oxytocins.

    Note:  Oxytocin also is known as Toesen, Syntocinon, Pitocin.  This is because of where it may be manufactured.  The World Health Organization warns Oxytocin is a threat to the child's developing brain cells.  They then direct the child to be endangered to be anemic, and low blood volumed because they direct all babies to have immediate umbilical cord clamping. This deprives the baby from 20 to up to 60 percent total blood volume.  The W.H.O. did not give a qualified clinical studies as their reference, but said using oxytocin required mandatory immediate cord clamping.  ??? !!!!.  The W.H.O. is not an association of accountability when you try to write them letters for an explanation.  Why not?

    a) All drugs cross the placenta and can cause allergic reactions to the mother or the child.

    b) There is no safe amount in any drug no matter the skill or knowledge  of the person(s) giving the drug.

5) The mother will have nothing applied to her cervix, creams, or gels. These applications can absorb into her blood stream, and thus the child's.  

    a) Natural birth does not need to soften the cervix. This is done naturally by natural hormones within her own body, such as relaxin.

6) The mother will have no drug stimulates during the birth of her child and this is including the man-made hormone oxytocins. This drug increases the chance of bleeding as to causing heavy contractions on the uterus. Oxytocin does not stop bleeding from torn blood vessels. Platelets and serotonin  are hormones that seal up broken blood vessels. "serotonin a substance in the blood that causes blood vessels to constrict and aids in the blood clotting; hydroxytriptamine.  It is an indole, chemically related to adrenalin and hallucinogenic drugs (LSD) that also occurs in the brain and in smooth muscles of the intestines and functions in brain chemistry.  Formula: C10 H12 N2 0. (Reference World Book Dictionary,Vol L-Z p. 1903).

    a) The baby's umbilical cord will have No Clamping for any reasons, except if the child's cord tore or for a c-section if consented to, for placenta previa.

    b) The baby must remain unclamped and uncut from the lifeline, the umbilical cord. No hand -squeezing or invasive touching of the cord may be done.

    c)  For any cosmetic removal of the umbilical cord, only the parents can do this. If this is done the parents will do this themselves, and may choose to purchase a provided clamping and cutting tool made by Dupont. Or, by boiling scissors and string and by using iodine, if they wish they will be the ones to cosmetically remove the cord and placenta by these means that were used by early Pioneers.

    b) The mother can birth forward sitting, forward side-ways position, or any gravity position, she chooses.

3) The mother will birth in the warmest room possible, and can birth her baby in a warm water tub.

    a) This is in addition to any oxygen the child may be receiving if now breathing on his/her own.

    b) This placenta oxygenated blood through the cord's vein will be so as long as the mother was not given oxytocin that causes premature pulling away of the placenta and depriving the child of oxygenated blood to his/her expanding lungs.

    c) Therefore, this oxytocin will not be allowed or anything of the nature of a muscle contracting drug, injected or by pill or powder form.

    d) Such drugs are abortion drugs intended to terminate the pregnancy by strong muscle contraction, which synthetic oxytocin does with extreme contractions and harmful to the mother and the child.. They are not natural muscle contractions.

8) The placenta, when born, will be placed, too, in a warm towel, and kept with the baby and not tied, clamped, or hand squeeze, nor a needle inserted in the umbilical vein.

    a)  There is no medical need to cosmetically remove the placenta and cord. It will fall off without cord infection in a day or two. (See Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration.

    b)  The mother may remove the placenta cord hours or days, later, or allow it to fall off naturally.

    c)  This is a natural pioneer birth method now given the name of Lotus Birth. (Called after Clare Lotus Day who thought going back to natural was best care of all for babies).

1) The mother only can change any of the above tenets and must be given all factual information and all risks involved for any suggested care and services.

    a)  The mother, at all times has the right to refuse any cutting of her body to birth her child, knowing the risks of her own life or the child's.

    (Revised:  March 13, 2004:  Please see the latest event of a woman charged for refusing to have her body cut, for a suggested c-section birth.  They medics are alleging one twin died, because of the woman's refusal to have a c-section. It is likely the twins were actually endangered by substance abuse.  In any case, added drugs to a women who is on drugs threatens all their lives.  The woman need not risk her life for her child's to give birth.  She may, only sacrifice her own life, by a voluntary choice.

    Some children may die in natural birth, some may die far before the due date. Doctors are causing harm to babies by early drugging them, in the womb, and during birth, and they are not before the courts. Why not? Or the drug companies.  And some of the drugs and vaccinations may be using radioactive drugs, and the public cannot test them.  Where are the Geiger counters, in each community?

    No woman, regardless of her mental condition, when pregnant, must not be threatened to submit to any cutting at all, of her body, in order to give birth.  Right or wrong, that must be the woman's own decision.  And only the mother has the finale say, and not the Court or society, on such choices of the individual woman's.  We can't use studies to make a standard of care policy.

     Society has allowed for women to abort babies on demand.  Society allows the aborted babies to be harvested, so the women's bodies were being exploited to give to society embryos and fetuses society wanted as second class citizens for stem cell transplants.  The aborted babies were not given a funeral, but mushed up into centrifugal equipment and extracted for hormones, enzymes, and all nutrients of the human tissue and blood.  Most women did not know that their babies were discarded in that fashion.  That was a breach of trust in not knowing what was appropriate discarding of fetal tissue and blood.  So the medical persons must go on trial, for when they abuse by secrets of their own-state-of-the-art-policies. Secrets are for hierarchies.  Is medicine a religion or is it democratic, or ought to be?   We women, most of all, need consumer protection in medicine and informed choices and right to say "NO" to suggested medical treatment to all women, equally, and for our children, too.  This is as according to what most "men" have always had.

To quote the below link:

".....Rowland resisted the recommendation that she deliver by C-section and insisted on going outside to smoke before eventually giving her consent for the operation. The boy was stillborn and the girl was in respiratory distress, the nurse said. A doctor reported that the girl also tested positive for cocaine and alcohol in her blood. "

http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Mar/03122004/utah/147031.asp

  Some Question Mom's Murder Charge For Refusing C-Section

http://www.wnbc.com/news/2917523/detail.html

Woman Warned Baby Would Die Without Operation

POSTED: 9:36 a.m. EST March 12, 2004

UPDATED: 2:24 p.m. EST March 12, 2004

SALT LAKE CITY -- A woman accused of murder because she allegedly avoided a Caesarean section that could have saved her unborn twin has denied the charge, saying she already had scars from earlier C-sections.

Her attorney, meanwhile, said she had a long history of mental illness.

Melissa Ann Rowland, 28, was charged Thursday of showing "depraved indifference to human life," ignoring medical advice to deliver her twins by C-section because she didn't want to be scarred. One nurse told police Rowland said she would rather "lose one of the babies than be cut like that."

Also:

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/CalgarySun/News/2004/03/12/379284.html

______________________________________________________

SUCH AS ALLEGED FEARS WHICH ARE NOT BASED IN SUBSTANTIATED FACT OF EMPIRICAL SCIENCE

2)  This would be by the failure of the medical person not to have discussed any reason he/she would change or suggest a change to the above contract' tenets, and such known surprises to cause early clamping, for an example, and, most recently being used, are the fears of the mother bleeding. This is when the mother is not tested and known to be anemic.  And to rob her of placenta blood for a fear is not making any informed decision for the mother, who wants to have a healthy child, not one in low blood volume, needing addition blood from another source.

        e)  Early clamping of the umbilical cord, is a form of blood-letting without the substantiated evidence it needed to be done.

        f) There would be need to impose blood-letting on a newborn child.  The child is not properly evaluated at birth and early cord clamping  would not be known to be correct medical procedure at the quick judgement to have done that to a child.  

Natural Birth Education and Practice maintains normal Homeostasis whereas Active Management upsets this natural balance. For example the pH balance is disturbed by chemicals in the blood.  The homeostasis means that the "internal environment remains within normal limits or values, regardless of the conditions in the external environment.  In humans, for example:

    1.  The blood glucose concentration remains at about 100 mg / 100 ml.  Change this and one may be diabetic.

    2.  The pH of blood is always near 7.4.

    3.  Blood pressure in the brachial artery averages near 120 / 80 mm Hg.

    4.  Body temperatures average around 37 C (98.6 F).

    This internal environment consists of tissue fluid, which bathes all the cells of the body.  Tissue fluid is refreshed when molecules such as oxygen and nutrients exit blood and wastes enter blood.  Tissue fluid remains constant only as long as blood composition remains constant.  It is important to realize that it is the "internal environment" of tissues that is ultimately responsible for our health and well-being.  

    Why risk changing the pH of your baby's system during birth by taking the drugs.  The pH scale is used to indicate the acidity (sugar) and basicity (alkalinity) of a solution.  Distilled water has has neutral pH.  There means there is a n equal number of hydrogen ions and hydroxide ions.  If you take in some sugary substance (acidity) the pH scale may indicate the pH moves towards 6.8 pH, lower than 7, like lemons or vinegar, or coca- cola.  If you take something more salty, potato chips the scale can move to 7.5 towards the alkalinity.  The human body when healthy has a buffer that resists pH changes because the buffers are chemicals or combinations of chemicals that can take up excess hydrogens (H+) or hydroxide ions (OH-).  The main buffer in blood is a combination of carbonic acid and bicarbonate ions which are a dissociation product of carbon acid.  Carbonic acid (H2CO3) is a weak acid that minimally dissociates and then reforms.  When the buffers can combine with "both" hydrogen ions (H+) acids sugar and hydroxide ions (0H-) salty, our body resists any pH changes.

    One cannot know how the mother obtaining drugs during labor will change her tiny babies pH.  The drugs are  morphines (that delay the labor) and synthetic oxytocins that speed labor up.  There are unknown preservatives (mercury, lead, aluminum, chlorobutanol) and these all are known to cross the placenta and can endanger baby, so small, that there capacity to adjust to the drug invasion of al their cells are being endangered.

(Reference:  Inquiry Into Life, p 29).

Consider pH balance if you are to receive drugs during labor and during the birth of the child, by any application, gels, creams, injections, spinals, pills, they will change the blood chemistry:

The chemoreceptors respond to chemical substances in the immediate vicinity.  These chemoreceptors are in varius organs that are sensitive to internal condition.  Chemoreceptors in certain blood vessels monitor the hydrogen ion concentration (H+) in the blood, and if the pH lowers, the breathing rate increases.  As more carbon dioxide is expired, the blood pH will rise. (P. 348, Inquiry Into Life)

Case-Laws to consider in studies of choices of Active Management vs Natural Birth Education:

1. Ruling Case-Law, forced caesarean section ruled unjust.   BMJ 1997: 314:993 (5 April) Web Site: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7086/993

1. Ruling Case-Law, Right to Refuse PKU Test.  BMJ 2001;323:1149 (17 November) web site: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abridged/323/7322/1149

1. Ruling Case-Law (Chow)  O.J. No. 279 DRS 99-03087 Court File No. 92-CQ-017535, Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) web site:   http://www.sommersandroth.com/case-law-chow.htm

1. Ruling Case-Law (ING) web site:   http://www.sommersandroth.com/case-law-ing.htm

1. Class Action, The Edmonton Sun, 100 Families launch massive lawsuit over drugs they say made kids sick.  $1 billion asked, plus $250 million in punitive damages.   Drug Thimerasol, an ethyl-mercury derivative  used to preserve the vaccines, but not necessary to make them safe and effective.   Autism Sickness after vaccinations.

1. Moore v. Regents of the University of California ( wolf/moore)  Web Site:     http://www.richmond.edu /

1. Moore v. Regents . . .Who Owns Your Genetic Information, April 3, 2001, Web Site: http://forhealthfreedom.org/Publications/Informed/WhoOwns.html

1. Moore vs Regents . . .Surpassing The Material:  The Human Rights Implications of Informed Consent in Bioprospecting Cells Derived from Indigenous People Groups Web Site: http://law.wustle.edu/wulq/78-3/wu.pdf

• Yurko, Alan, R. Articles, July 3, 2002.  Orlando, Fl.  Personal Letter(s) Alleges Vaccination, immediate cord clamping, drugging his wife during birth killed his baby, while he was accused of Shaking His Baby.  He would not Admit Guilt and is Imprisoned.  web site:   www.freeyurko.bizland.com

________________________________________________

• The facts of how long the medical persons have known that touching the umbilical cord injures the baby, to blood deprivation, was written by Dr. Erasmus Darwin, in Vol III, Page 302, Zoonomia, London, 1801.  More information can be found at these websites:  

"Another thing very injurious to the child, is the tying and cutting of the

navel string too soon; which should always be left till the child has not

only repeatedly breathed but till all pulsation in the cord ceases. As

otherwise the child is much weaker than it ought to be, a portion of the

blood being left in the placenta, which ought to have been in the child."

Erasmus Darwin, Zoonomia, 1801, Vol III, page 302.

• Dr. E. Darwin, the Grandfather of Charles, when he said, "Another thing . . . "  I wonder what more he was trying to tell us that were harmful to women and the newborn child.  
• • Perhaps, unnecessary experimentation on the human being, by raising the child excessive above the womb, or excessively lowering the child, and in a cold room, not immediately wrapping the baby in a warmed towel.
  • The vulnerable, naive and trusting female, and the helpless child, were totally dependent on high ethics and duty for his/her care and development.

HOW ONE CHRISTIAN FAITH DEALS WITH THE PLACENTA DISPOSAL:

A CHRISTIAN'S FAITH AND THE CHILD BIRTH PROCESS:

    The parent's faith and trust may have been violated as to breach of trust by the family genetic codes being in the hands of labs and not with informed consent. And, to some, if the blood was used in human medical transfusions or drugs, it was a violation to one's faith, if they were of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith and took the faith tenets seriously.  They would have to agree the blood was burned that had been deprived their baby by early clamping.  

    Most JW's did not know what the hospital policies were on this issue, and did not know to contract of no clamping off their baby's placenta cord, like most other persons, of any faith, or of no faith.

    If the JW's did not read the article published in 1997, that believed that discarding and disposal of human tissue was by likely burning.  There may have been oversights on the placenta organ on its cosmetic removal done at the hospital. The facts are it can be removed simply in the parents own home, not at the hospital.  When the placentas are removed at the hospital, or even if not removed, the blood is still being syringed out by needle from the placenta.  The hospitals do want the placenta blood the purpose of early cord clamping.

     Now, apparently, the hospitals sold the placentas "after being drained" to cosmetic and research drug companies ; and the blood drained of the placenta and put into blood banks. (See references. www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm )

    (Reference by personal inquiry to the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania , Hospital Information Services, 25 Columbia Heights, Brooklyn, NY 11201 -2483, U.S.A., email: his@wtbts.org

    Questions from Readers" February 1, 1997 issue of The Watchtower magazine.  

    "According to news reports, after a baby is delivered, some hospitals save the placenta and umbilical cord to extract things from their blood.  Should this concern a Christian?"  

    Answer...."the products are disposed of in accordance with local law."  

    The Doubting Thomas:  

        You cannot find who upholds the local law on the disposal of human organs.  The hospitals do not burn the organs themselves anymore, and research labs and drug companies purchase organs and the blood is practically used from the placentas.  

        As to this doubt, the watch tower writers anticipated, thus, stated:

     "If a patient had valid reason to doubt that such a normal practice was going to be followed, he or she could mention it to the physician involved, stating that for religious reasons he or she wanted all such products disposed of."  

    And still, The Doubting Thomas:  

    The medical society laughs at these words, "disposed of."  This is because discarding and disposal may mean practical use, not necessarily "burning."  Therefore, what you do not know will not hurt you.  However, to keep the faith, clarification needs to be specific in instructions. If the doubting Thomas needs assurance, they may need an eye witness account what actually is done to organs, like the placenta, filled with blood by early clamping.  Most mothers do not care what happens to their baby's placenta, or if the cord was early clamped, they just want a living baby and glad they survived the "active management" birth process. See Placenta photos this web site.

    A doubting Thomas might want to find out in his/her own community:

     Who picks the placenta and other organs up?  

    Where do they go for discarding, how and where?

    If the hospital staff answers are likely evasive...then birth at home.  When you ask the Maternity Ward's head nurse what is going on with the placenta, she becomes very nervous and says they are discarded. That is the end of the conversation as far as she or the head surgeon or Chief of Staff is concerned. Things are to remain a secret in most hospitals. The Administration staff alleged they do not know either. It is more likely to get results if you as for the billing and expense department of disposing of organs, as to private contractors in the area, and what the destination of delivery is, labs, university research, stem cell research, or disposal by burning, and where?

    You are most wise, today, birth at home.  Then the placenta can be buried near your favorite shrub, or can be burned. Or, follow the birth plan, do not allow detaching of the placenta in the hospital, and no putting in needles in the vein or the placenta, so baby does not leave the parents sight, ever, without a family care witness with the child, at all times.

    Babies can be operated on with the placenta still attached. See Miracle Baby. The cord and placenta will fall off naturally, in a day or two's time.  Have faith that this natural process allows no cord infections and the baby is assured he/she gets full blood volume and pressure as was the design of the creator. The baby's blood is then not taken to be sold and used in stem cell transplants.

copyright, and for permission to use, please, contact    dyoung@pris.ca

________________________________________________

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.

We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.

Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  No Policies, AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth.  Search Lotusbirth

(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies "  It is believed had a duty to have a policy of equal protection which should uphold best practice possible least risk of harm.  This upholds a legal duty of the Criminal Codes and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for the enforcement for even a baby's security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.

NOTE:  for any hospital to have taken the blood as salvage blood, as though owned by the Province was a violation of informed consent, as the parents are the legal guardians to protect genetic information of their family, and the child.  No genetic testing can be imposed by taking samples of the child's blood.  No pricking of the heel for such a PKU test or pH can be done.  These tests can be done only with informed consent, not imposed by medical policy.  If done these tests can be done safely by urine samples. Urine tests are a little more inconvenient but safer to the child. They offer least risk of a virus accidently inserted into the child's blood stream. Cautions is best and safer then risking the child to inserted viruses, that can be late or slow in developing by any breaking of the child's skin.  That is common sense to do the least risk taking on another's child.

contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home:   www.lotusbirth.com

References of research:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

This Web Url:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-99.htm

This Site was modified:  December 14, 2003