bullet1 Early Umbilical Cord Clamping may leave victims with disposition to flesh eating disorder

    The flesh eating disease , medically called, Necrotizing Fasciitis, can it be a risk to mothers accepting active management in hospitals rather then electing to chose primal birth, now called Lotus Birth? Can mothers, volunteering for a c-section birth because the fear natural contracting discomfort, be subjecting themselves, needlessly, to risks of the flesh eating disease? Some mothers who had an alleged "safe" operation of a c-section (increases over 26 percent, when prior to the 1920's, c-sections were for emergency births at 5 percent), did get the disease, necrotizing fasciities. They seemed to have had a predisposition towards this disease.  It happened to them.  Why risk it?  The following are some links to innocent cuts of a person skin leading to the flesh eating disease. The links, provided below, are very graphic and not for children or for the faint of heart. This article is by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education.  (Revised Feb. 29, 2004)


    It is believed that unnecessary procedures done in child birth, that puts a needle into the child's skin (needle taking a blood sample for PKU tests and for pH samples, which could be done when the baby is older or by urine tests), may leave the child vulnerable to being accidentally, inserted with virus, that is slow or fast acting.  This virus can surface when the child is vulnerable, at a later date. It could be an small fall or an minor illness and the lurking virus takes hold.


 It is best if mothers look into primal birth, now called Lotus Birth,  for safer options and gentle means for child birth, and warm water births. The latter help the mother to say no to drugs, her legal right not to be drugged at any time of the child's birth.  Many women, unknowingly are injected with oxytocin, when their baby's head is born. This leads to mandatory immediate cord clamping to prevent brain injury to the child's brain by the allegations the man-made oxytocin destroys the baby's brain. The allegations, not documented to source, were made in 1998 by the  World Health Organization,  see references this web site.  


The early clamping off the umbilical cord, suppling blood from the placenta to the child's expanding lungs, will then lead to brain injury risk to the child. This is because of the child now having low blood volume and pressure, and this is anemia.  


There is risk that any virus can be inserted by needles into the skin for whatever the reasons, given for a needle put into one's body.  We do not have to submit to such risk taking. WE ought to and should say no.  Any pregnant mother accepting any needled or drug is risking the crossing of the placenta and raising an impaired and compromised child and a legal battle for the care of the child, thereon, in education costs.  All this, of course, is financially political in nature... there will be those who benefit from sick children and women, and will, not otherwise, if they are healthy.  


   Mothers by policy can have and expect an unassisted birth in warm water. Warm water births, in place of drugs being the choice of the mothers, is known to be safe and approved by Policy #71, December 1998, by SOGC.   This is the "only" good of that policy statement of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada that I have observed in that one policy. SOGC's Policy #89 May 2000 directed all babies be immediate umbilical cord clamped.  I guess all Canadian babies were having the risk of brain damage by mothers injected with oxytocin, if the hasty clamping supported W.H.O.'s position. But SOGC gave the reason for immediate cord clamping, because they wanted a pH test.  The facts are that the pH tests and PKU tests, if wanted by the parents, can be done by safer options, by urine tests. And if a cord blood sample was of imperative need for an immediate testing, a fine needle, at risk of viruses to the child, could have been an option to clamping off the flowing circulation system of the baby.  Why were not all options told the mother, long before the birth, and her right to know about "no clamping" and primal birth as her choice, even in a hospital environment, for so-called security of person, the mother and the child.


    When babies have early clamping, to store their blood for a rainy day, (most insane to make the child vulnerable to blood-letting), they are anemic.  The mother has a risk of birthing a ruptured full blood placenta, unless the baby's deprived blood is drained from the placenta, while yet warm in her birth canal.  Injections of any kind following that deprivation of blood to give then the baby Vit. K for the low blood platelets and low white cells, and injections of Hep. B, lead to internal viruses bothering an anemic low immunity child.  The site of injections may leave some persons with a previous  predisposition to serious infections, such as the flesh eating disease , medically called, Necrotizing Fasciitis  (NF). by Donna Young


    Quote:   http://www.nnff.org/nnff_what.htm

    "Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a bacterial infection. This bacteria attacks the soft tissue and the fascia, which is a sheath of tissue covering the muscle. NF can occur in an extremity following a minor trauma, or after some other type of opportunity for the bacteria to enter the body such as surgery.

The Group A Strep infection (flesh eating bacteria) is most common with minor trauma. A mixed bacterial infection is often the cause after surgery.

We can personally tell you about people who developed NF after a C-section, after abdominal surgery, after scratching a rash, after giving birth vaginally, from a tiny scratch, after bumping a leg with a golf bag, after a friendly punch in the arm from a buddy, after a little cut on the finger, after a cut on the foot, after a rug burn, after having a routine blood draw in a physical exam, after a broken arm, and after a broken leg, and from no known trauma at all. . . ."

______________________


Understanding the immunity system and this can be weakened by blood loss, as would be the case of 20 to 60 percent total blood volume deprived infants, at birth.  They are then hastily injected with stuff..........that is not healthy for any newborn child.  No wonder they are risk, at any age to lurking viruses to flare up with the slightest case of flu, or injury.

http://www.lymphomainfo.net/lymphoma/lymphsys.html

http://web.indstate.edu/nurs/mary/N308/wbcout.html

Natural Immunity would make sense to be there at birth by natural birth education and practice:

http://edcenter.med.cornell.edu/CUMC_PathNotes/Immunopathology/Immuno_01.html

Cancers may begin, or a disposition towards cancer by a low immunity system, which can begin at birth by blood volume deprivation:

http://www.plwc.org/plwc/MainConstructor/1%2C1744%2C_04-0076-00_12-001043-00_17-001029-00_18-0025938-00_19-000-00_20-001-00_21-008%2C00.html


WHAT IS DEPRIVED THE BABY OF HIS/HER LEGAL RIGHTS OF BLOOD VOLUME And PRESSURE

    STOPPED BY AN UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING TOOL/WEAPON:

All  these cells are deprived a child, at birth, about 4 to 6 ounces from 10 ounces of blood if 60 percent of blood is denied a baby, who should have 10 ounces of total blood volume, if the baby is 9 months gestation and weighed 9 -pounds.  See references of facts at: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Types of Cells Deprived the infant/owner of the placenta blood:   http://www.oncologychannel.com/leukemias/bonemarrow.shtml

http://www.albany.net/~tjc/immucells3.html


http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/B/bodystory/t_allergy_immune.html

Some Glossary Words:

http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/B/bodystory/t_glossary.html

    The following are links and graphics to understand this flesh eating disease more.  

    Warning Pictures are very Graphic.


This is the link to the lymphatic system and the white cells that fight bacteria and viruses, if we have a healthy supply of them.

http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/sigbio/project/updated-lymphatic/lymph8.html


Some stories on the Flesh Eating Disease, many starting with just flu symptoms, and/or a minor bruise or cut on the body:

Please copy and past to the web address:


Many stories are they just thought they had the flu, or just had a cut or

bruise on their bodies...some disorders began after a c-section, or an

operation of some kind...we don't really know how bad this disease is.......


True Story in Dawson Creek, BC, Canada:

I shared this true story of two survivors, just by chance:

Also, on surgeon in Dawson Creek, and 2 or 3 ladies near death following

infections after surgery, delay in taking their situation seriously:


Jaiden Marie's Guestbook

Name Donna Young

From Canada

Time 11/18/2003 10:11:21 PM

http://www.babiesonline.com/guestbook/guestbook_view.asp?be=j/jaidenmarie

Comments:

Wow! Glad you and baby are alive and well. What an experience. There was an

undertaker here in my community who stuck himself with a needle after

injecting a corpse. His arm became painful and swollen; he went to the

doctor who was just given him a pain killer and antibiotic - when the doctor

dropped the needle and pricked himself. Soon the doctor was having fast

painful infection, so he called a friend, and he said he and the other man

had the flesh eating disease. He called the undertaker and they both began

intensive injections of strong drugs. They, like, you are both fine today.

Good luck. If you have any more babies, please visit my site. I encourage

moms to have natural birth education and practice, if they can, and not to

clamp their baby's lifeline, for c-section or natural birth.

www.lotusbirth.com Best Always.


http://www.nnff.org/survivors/ellena/ellena.htm


http://www.nnff.org/nnff_jackie.htm


http://www.nnff.org/survivors/jennifer_young/jennifer_young.htm

graphic picture of c-section infection...good reason to take c-sections as a

very serious operation with risks.


More graphic pictures:

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/sheila_toppi/sheila.htm  

cause a "routine" laparoscopy

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/sheila_toppi/sheila_page2.htm


Graphic pictures

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/cassi_moore/cassi.htm   

Story small cut on her thumb...I would think the virus is there already lurking for opportunity...and likely there since birth, where babies cords are clamped and cut, needlessly in hospitals that have air borne diseases, everywhere.  This is including on clothing of any medial care person, working there.


http://www.nnff.org/survivors/cassi_moore/cassi_page2_hands.htm

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/cassi_moore/cassi_page2_feet.htm


graphics & cause a Tummy Tuck:

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/debbie_hitchcock/debbie_hitchcock.htm

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/debbie_hitchcock/debbie_page2.htm


Tracy's story: That people survive this is a miracle.


http://www.nnff.org/survivors/tracy_n/tracy_n.htm

http://www.nnff.org/survivors/tracy_n/tracy_n_page2.htm


Related Links to Umbilical Cord Clamping and Anemia in babies:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=13679933

______________________________________________



contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home:   www.lotusbirth.com

References of research:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com  


Related Links on Umbilical Cord Clamping and Anemia in babies:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=13679933