Unassisted Birth Stories and Links
Laura Shanley Bornfree! - The Unassisted Childbirth Page
http://unassistedchildbirth.com
Laura Shanley's Articles birth stories, & poetry
The Waterbirth Website
http://www.well.com/user/karil/
see Comments (1) by Donna Young below on logic of warm water births, and
no clamping or tying off the pulsating umbilical
cord, at the end.
______________________________
The Association for Pre- & Perinatal Psychology and Health
Directors of APPPAH 2003
Birth and Violence, The Societal Impact:
The Conference
http://www.birthpsychology.com/apppah/dirs.html
Until recently, neither psychology nor medicine has given adequate attention to very early development, in the false belief that prenates and neonates could not feel, remember, learn, or be influenced by these experiences. This was a tragic miscalculation that made guinea pigs of us all. For the last two decades we should have known better. A wave of studies revealed the sensitivity, awareness, and intelligence of newborn behavior. Over the same period, studies of the baby in the womb also revealed the same qualities."
___________________________________
see comments (2) on Gentle Birth and evidence biology textbooks and authors directed harmful rough care of the newborn "human" baby and directed clamping off their pulsating cord, depriving the human baby of up to 60 percent total blood volume, weakening some babies, at the discretion of the medical persons, who secretly concealed the amount of blood deprived a child, and with participation of most nurses, too.
by Donna Young
______________________________________________
The Association for Pre- & Perinatal Psychology and Health
Directors of APPPAH
2003
___________________
Donna Young's website on the dangers of Early Cord Clamping and a lot more!
NEW Link
www.lotusbirth.com
(1) Warm water births comments:
The Good of Policy #71, December 1998 of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) stated no harm done by warm water births. There were no rules why you can't birth in water. No nurse in any hospital, because they are lacking training can deny your use of warm water, even if you bring your own pool. If it looks like a fight, birth unassisted in your own home, and write a letter of unqualified services in your community, and be sure to name the uneducated nurses and doctors on this issue, for failing to know history and repeat it during current times. Their policies, again, cannot be imposed on you by any uneducated nurse not educated on warm water births. Remember, this is traditional to all women. The pioneers in Western Civilization used warm water births in the 1900's. You can too.
The pioneer methods were buried in the USA and Canadian societies behind
closed doors. This began when doctors and
their own trained nurses moved in on the baby business. The doctors sought the support by the politicians
who support this
institutionalized births beginning when the blood typing was done in 1901. In developing nations,
women did not loose the right to
birth unassisted in their own homes.
I suggest the closed door births, where they were a family affair in the homes,
were contrived to the opportunity of taking the
placenta blood by early clamping of the child's lifeline. Who would be the wiser. The women
could not see what was being done
to them, and the husbands were not present. And today, the husbands are as clueless on this issue
as the birthing women.
Even the pioneer women did not discuss such matters of birth and were directed
not too. By chance, when I was age 14, I
heard this is how my grandmother gave birth, and others like her, no tying or cutting off the cord. They had no navel infected
babies, no blood infections, and their babies were not injected with Vit K, as their babies had natural
blood clotting factors as
they had all their blood. Their babies were not anemic, or jaundice, caused by overload of iron,
caused by death of too many red
cells.
Natural birth education and practice should be taught from knee high. The important issue is to respect all mammals
placentas that they are not interrupted to take the creatures strength way, by depriving the creature,
human or animal, of their
blood volume. The strength and longevity is in the nutrients of the blood.
In Water Birth, SOGC only stated two important facts to be known:
(1) not to have the water to warm or too cold, and
(2) to bring the baby's face out of the water immediately.
Why?
Logically for the reason that babies are mammals not fishes...you do not know
for sure if the placenta is still providing the
oxygenated blood, or just giving the blood transfused into the baby's expanding lungs. Why take
chances, allow for the baby's to
breathe when the lungs have the blood there for oxygenation, and do not clamp or cut the cord until
the placenta is expelled.
It is wiser to do this the Pioneer Lotus Birth, that follows gentle warm water
births. The warmth and no clamping keeps the
baby a Biological Reciprocal Sealed-Unit. There is no rush to remove the placenta or cord, even
if the baby needed an
operation or tests.
Keep the baby together with the placenta, wrapped in separate warmed towels. This is true for all babies, including for c-section babies and premature babies.
All babies have this legal right of security of person that they get their placenta
blood and no other. Do not harvest your baby.
The blood is for immediate need and optimal health.
One day, your child will ask you about the birth and the timing of the clamping
of their umbilical cord. They will associate any
minor heart, stroke, lung problems to blood deprivation of 20 to 50 percent total blood deprivation. Will it have been by their own
mother's decision that the child expected to be made with informed consent, an educated position of
protection to the baby's
legal rights to be the best it could be, but deprived if shy of essential nutrients in the child's original
blood, then deprived, if so?
If that is not the case, the mother was not properly advised of deprivation
of essential nutrients to the child's immediate needs,
I advocate a Writ be filed in the child's own name. Appropriate care forms signed is not informed consent. Such methods to
deceive the mother she accepts blindly whatever is done to her body or the baby gives no real protection
to the midwife, doctor,
doula, that did not warn or counsel of the proper care and legal rights and duty to the child.
Faking reasons to interrupt the child's circulation system, must be shown factual
of need to be a benefit to the child, the owner
of the placenta and the blood inside the placenta. It is not the mother's organ or the mother's
blood, but the child's, the true legal
owner, and none other. No one can waive a duty of care to the child, not a judge, not the mother,
not the doctor, not a policy to
endanger, either.
Varieties of false reasons are given by clever midwives, and other medical
persons. This is most unethical, and many of
them have used the element of surprise. They surprised the mother to fear of bleeding and other
fears, used to con hasty
clamping. It is not only midwives doing this, but many doctors use the same ploys, they have to
test the baby, etc, etc. Nonsense.
FILING A WRIT FOR FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION TO YOUR BABY: THIS IS EVEN FOR IN
APPEARANCE, ON THE SURFACE, OF HEALTHY LIVING BABIES.
Many of these babies were caused to be jaundiced, excess iron cells in their
blood, overload by hasty clamping. These
babies surviving that jaundice and later anemia had been violated by the birth person(s), taking advantage
and likely participating
in the harvesting of the baby's healthy stem cell blood. The placenta blood, rich in suspensions
of blood, white cells, red cells,
stem cells, platelets, hormones, enzymes, amino acids, proteins were all taken in secret by one of the
persons. This was as the
mother and father are concerned about their child. The medical persons skirting away the placenta
and secretly draining it, in
many instances, or the labs.
They were knowingly, without consent, harvesting the baby's placenta blood,
and selling it. These medical persons,
sometimes the Administration staff of the hospital, and their labs, were seeking the value of the placenta
and the blood in it. They
were knowingly involved in a conspiracy of secrecy of two or more, in this intent to take the blood
and placenta, without informed
consent. Policies are no protection for them to have done that, for it was a conflict of interest
and secret to the legal guardians of
the child, the parents. They were likely splitting income paid for blood collection for samples,
and as to the quality of blood
obtained from healthy babies from known healthy parents, and their lineage and /or that particular blood
type. Don't be conned.
If you are, sue, for breach of fiduciary trust.
FILING A WRIT IS JUST THE START OF SECURITY FUTURE DAMAGES TO THE CHILD AND FOR VIOLATION OF TRUST:
It needs not great effort or statements. It is basic and costs about $200.00 dollars to state a claim. What might the Writ state. Simply state the Umbilical Cord was clamped while the child's lips and tongue were still blue and the cord was red, firm and pulsating.
That this unnecessary procedure had not facts of need that was a benefit tot
he child. That it was done without informed
consent to the volume of blood yet in the placenta that the baby had a legal right as a newborn citizen
to have security of person
of every drop of blood not stopped by a clamp.
The endangering is to oxygen debt to the brain, heart, lungs, and any organ
by oxygenated blood deprivation, volume of blood
and pressure; weakening any one cell. One cell can guide and direct 10,000 other cells. The duty was
not for any medical person
to do unnecessary interventions, not provable a benefit to the child or the mother.
Fears of an condition happening is not empirical science to endanger mother
or child. Did the condition happen. If not, why do
something endangering for no good apparent reason. What there safer options? If so, why
were they first not attempted?
The endangering to the mother of hasty clamping was the fact of blood volume
and pressure of the blood going backward a
threat to the mother of two types of blood mixing was a reality of a danger to the mother; and blood
volume deprivation and a
violation to the child.
File a Writ for unnecessary threat to the child, for latent injury to even one
cell. The child can release the obligation of
settlement when they are of legal age to do so. Again, the parents spend the $208.00 for the Writ
to be taken in the child's name,
as soon as they have found out the deception of any medical person that excused hasty clamping on the
child' lifeline.
The clamping of the cord has motive for blood and another is merely done cosmetically,
not a valid reason, not a medical
need. And in hospitals or birth centers, they may do this trend to harvest the placenta by selling
it to drug companies, cosmetic
companies, and early clamping means they harvest the baby's stem cells, that the doctors sell, too,
and midwives.
These medical persons are being likely rewarded for this known interference
of the baby's placenta blood by every so much
taken, every 20 ccs collected, by codes of samples taken, may fetch $150.00 or more, and 4 ounces may
be a major payment of
$25,000.00. Why have your baby harvested and endangered to be less then nature intended the baby to
be a blue ribbon baby
with all brain cells not have any risk of an oxygen debt, or the nervous system. Your baby has
a right to his/her fair share of genius
potential, and early clamping reduces the child to average or less then average abilities, that is an
IQ of about 93. Best is 143 IQ,
they learn easier and with less distress to remember and achieve.
ADVANTAGES TO WARM WATER BIRTHS -- NO SHOCK ON THE CHILD OF COLD AIR THAT ALSO STOPS THE
PULSATING CORD:
Warm water births allow for no cold air on the cord to stop the transfusion of oxygenated blood to the baby's lungs. Warm water births that allow the mothers to catch their own babies, and not a stranger's hands on the child or risking a clamping tool endangering your baby to go into shock.
Again, protect your babies with an Signed Contract of what the medical persons
cannot do. If they do not sign the birth
contract, a waiver, birth unassisted. Just don't call them for hours after the birth of your baby. After all, babies do come suddenly
don't they? All babies need to be care for logically and simply, nothing fancy.
Birth in the warmest room possible,
wrap the baby, when born, immediate in a warm towel, or remain in the tub; do not fuss with weighting or measuring, that can be done any time, no fire-drill to be done quickly.
wrap the placenta in a warm towel, when born, and do not clamp or tie, or hand squeeze
keep mother warm. Let the mother eat, take beverages and move around as she pleases.
There need be:
no cutting of her body, no drugs........for healthy babies, and happy mothers, in most 93 to 95 percent of all births.
Other problems are created by mismanagement called "active management"
where medical interventions are caused by
meddling with nature, in most instances.
The meddling are most drugs, with questionable trace elements, ingredients and preservatives, that can allergies, even death to sensitivities to them or contaminants.
These are drugs, morphines do slow down the labor, that is not painless birth. That is labor stopped. Don't be deceived.
That is deception they have stopped the birth process, in the same manner they
attempted to use pillows, and crossing the
mothers legs together, until the doctor arrived to catch his or her fees.
That is the purpose of using drugs..it is more subtle then such past known
delaying of the birth, and harmed most mothers and
babies that was done to.
Drugs are used to restart the labor, and this is all unnatural. The speeding
the birth up is using harmful oxytocins, known too,
and by the drug companies to harm the mother and the child.
There are no safe dosage or skills to give drugs to a birthing lady. There
are always the risk to allergies...even death. This
risk of death to mother and child is for any risk of interventions including breaking of the waters...that
risk obstruction of the cord,
that can get compressed, so why risk any meddling of breaking of the waters, invasion of gels, and creams,
stripping of the
membranes.
MOTHER'S BODY BE IN CONTROL, SAY "NO" YOU CAN, IT IS YOUR LEGAL RIGHT TO DO SO: POLICIES CANNOT
RULE
OVER YOU BY A SELF-INTEREST GROUP CALLING THE SHOTS ON YOUR PERSON OR YOUR BABY. PUT THEM IN
THEIR PLACE, SAY NO.
It is your body, your baby, do have them sign a Birth Contract they cannot
do anything to the baby, outside of natural birth
education and practice. State clearly what they cannot do. List them on one page, and that only
you, the mother can change the
Contract, not a spouse, no one but you.
There are generally no suits for natural birth and education. There are
suits all the time for Controlled Active Management, in
the millions of dollars, every year, and class actions on the drugs. Do you want money or good
health? These interventions are
an unnatural obstruction to natural birth are generally associated with drugs.
These drugs can cause the baby to be mispositioned in the birth canal...that
is the dangers of oxytocins...fast, hard, long labor
contractions, neither the baby or the mother could control naturally.
These drugs took away the normal process of natural internal release of relaxin,
and oxytocin. These are naturally given
adequately by the mother's own system and babies too, and natural pain killers released to curb discomfort
of labor contractions.
Do Trust your own body and not the guesses of a medical society using artificially
drugs and not taking responsibilities in most
instances, as they say prove it...we "followed" policies. Their defense is they try to use
the policies to excuse them hoping you
think they not accountable for damaging your baby, if you signed an appropriate care form for treatment. Again, it was not
informed consent, the form for their protection is useless.
Don't be fooled with their attitude that they want you to think "Tough
Luck" if you trusted them and did not question their
policies.
Do Be alert. Be in Control. Learn birth delivery and what
is logical and practical before you even conceive and your partner
must be equally educated and be supportive to natural birth education and practice.
_____________________
(2) Notes: comments on gentle births:
Mothers never forget a bad birth experience. But a normal birth, taking the labor by moving around, no drugs, ideally, laboring at home, eating as necessary for energy, and not going to the hospital or birth center too soon (ideally birth at home at their own convenience) they do not remember, the birth contractions of inconvenience, at all.
I have found that many mothers were given Valium during labor. This drug is a form of the date-rape drug. The mothers went into the hospital, and most of them, being lucky, came out with a living baby but not remembering anything at all of their birth experiences. Drugging them was likely why. This was true of my mother's birth experience, she did not know what the doctor did in the clamping of any of her four babies; and this was true of a lady giving birth to fifteen babies. Not once was the issue of cord clamping ever questioned or discussed the doctors decided at the time the child was born, by the sex of the child, the color, race, size, and likely the social status of the family. They got to decide the fate of the child, to be a genius, or a worker of society. The IQ is in the oxygen debt to the brain by the deprivation of oxygenated blood and nutrients of the placenta blood. Do not let that power be in the hands of a stranger that you do not know their heart or conscience, in the truest sense.
As evidence of birth violence taught to be acceptable see list of references
and the biology textbooks, one in particular,
1980's, MacMillian, to quote:
Biology, MacMillan, Joan G. Creager, et al, 1985, p 708, This book
was used at the local High School, in Dawson Creek,
BC. It may yet be still available as a reference source. The book, which I have a copy in
my possession, misdirects the student
that breathing of the human baby is caused by immediate cord clamping on a pulsating cord, severing
the umbilical cord.
The author is directing a "sharp slap" on the backside is necessary to make the baby take its first breath. While there was reference to medical diagrams of the women placed flat on their back, the most harmful of birth positions plus semi-sitting positions for women, the quotation below, seemed to be the opinion and medical directives of the authors of this book. The book was used in some British Columbia schools.
I am an advocate of gentle birth, being a victim of Active Management, high operating tables, feet tied down in stir-ups, two episiotomies, and in one birth, the child drugged and followed by immediate cord clamping, and left sitting up in a upright position, and hardening of the breast as the milk came in, most painful. The baby circumcised as stated a medical necessity. Now we know the doctors have been banking the foreskin tissues in tissues banks, like the same with placentas being ground up and used in cosmetics, everything practical as to recycling of human parts, but without informed consent.
____________________
Note 3: Unassisted Births. I hardly recommend all mothers
birth unassisted in their own home tubs...and catch their own
babies, and here is why, the licensed midwives of today cannot be trusted to be deceptive and conceal
their intent to impose a
"fear" in their minds to harvest a baby's placenta blood by not substantiated need to endanger
the baby to be deprived one drop
of blood by hasty clamping. This is true to my experience of a family member with three midwives
(one a student) in Markham
area of Ontario services, using a fear of bleeding of the mother. They did not record on the child's
own medical chart, the child's
cord was firm, red and pulsating when they clamped the cord and failed to photograph the placenta, how
full it was, and to drain
on camera, the amount of blood they deprived this baby.
The blood deprivation, while babies do live, is causing the baby to have iron
overload. This is the death of many red cells.
They release their iron and proteins but there is so much, the liver and spleen of tiny babies cannot
deal with them, they overflow
into the blood stream. They can be toxic to cells. The baby has now insufficient volume
of red cells because of the early
clamping. This is logical to any qualified and trained doctor, who ought to know this through
standard biology courses and
training to deliver babies, or one would think so, eh?
What happened to the baby was a fake fear the mother was in danger, to then
endanger the baby to this iron overload and
deficiency of nutrients of blood, harvested for another and for a petty fee paid to the midwives for
that deception collection of
placenta blood and/or the placenta organ, filled with the deprived blood.
How did early clamping become a clinical standard of training and who started it? It
is normal for a mother to bleed during birth
and afterwards, even up to 4 cups of blood being usual. The placenta being full of placenta blood
risked heavier bleeding by
having to be birthed in fullness when naturally it would be birthed empty, a small cake, which means
placenta, flat cake. Instead it
was like a full placenta blood bag.
Many of these nutrients or proteins may never be adequate once deprived in the
original baby's placenta blood, that were
released by distressed cells. For example, I'm told once interferon comes out of the cell, it
is not replaced by that cell, once
depleted. Therefore,, Interferon, is the Big Daddy, that fights all bacteria and virus may never
come out again or be created in the
cells, once released of a distressed child, put into the fear of dying by deprived oxygenated debt to
any one cell, including brain
and nerve cells.
Other Links at www.lotusbirth.com that may be of interest are:
References of 4-year research, over 56 pages:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
Diagram of proper education for all medical persons:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm
An example of a false study limiting clamping to a mere 30-clamping on
premature babies, still then requiring revival, but deprived of 20 to 60
percent total blood volume, influencing other Nations, to do the same, with
this clinical study, that was absent of the mother's being told, no clamping
or cutting of the cord, is the right of the premature baby, or any baby,
however, or wherever born.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-449.htm
One in Sixteen Babies being revived after early cord clamping:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-193.htm
Babies blood let every 2nd and 3rd day, some will die, and not be
investigated for murder, by lower their stem cells that the baby goes into
shock and dies.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-192.htm
Babies early clamped to have their blood sacrificed to another: (see a photo
of a very large placenta, full of the a deprived baby's blood, a disgrace
for the States & Canada and other Nations involved in harvesting the living
babies.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-357.htm
Doris Haire Links, ignored, apparently of best practice possible, least risk
of harm.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-498.htm
Disease to babies by cut cords, and not cord need be clamped or cut, unless
the cord tore or for placenta previa.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-476.htm
Reduction of babies by 70 percent being revived by delayed clamping of the
cord, which should be natural delivery of the placenta before a clamp is on
the cord, full delayed OR, lotusbirth, no clamping at all:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-413.htm
Policies of drugs on the fetus/neonate:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-455.htm
Iron Overload caused by low blood volume and high death of red cells, common
to early clamped babies. Iron excess is not more blood, but likely less
blood.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-500.htm
Human Neonatal Foreskin Tissue Banks, real reason of circumcision, no doubt,
useful skin tissues, added income to tax revenue and to doctors services and
fees:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-463.htm
World Health Organization directs immediate cord clamping with use of
dangerous drug, Oxytocin:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-203.htm
ACOG cancels knowingly harmful and unreasonable hasty clamping policy #216,
November 1995 - January 2002
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-260.htm
200,000 drugged children in Canada, if we check, they will be drugged and
early clamped babies, early vaccinated in an anemic condition:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-252.htm
Each generation of doctors knew truth from as far back as 1801, not to clamp
or tie off or hand-squeeze a pulsating umbilical cord:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-202.htm
Clamped Cords give concern of internal blood infections, even in the
cleanest of hospitals, and over 400,000 to 500,000 babies die of a cut cord,
and that would not happen in naturally no clamping or cutting of the cord,
ever, not cosmetically removed but falls of naturally, as traditional
pioneer birth of child care.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-168.htm
and prolonged healings of cut cords:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-206.htm
Oxytocins known harmful, not only to WHO, but drug companies that make the
drug, used commonly for all birthing mothers, without disclosure made by
medical persons, or the hospitals allowing the drug used on their premises.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-190.htm
and by Martindale Pharmacopoeia, and like the USA and Canadian Food and Drug
Authorities, but did not go public, at large:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-186.htm
Chlorobutanol, known harmful to interrupt contractions of the heart, but
mothers not so warned, this drug may go by other names, per manufacturer.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-162.htm
Elimination by duty of ratification to United Nations:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-143.htm
Umbilical cords recorded since 1957, to pulsate up to 20 minutes, documented
in natural birth as well as in hospital births, that do not clamp the cord,
early.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-123.htm
Poster: Don't Clamp the Cord
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-98.htm
HOLES in the heart are caused by early cord clamping, the foramen ovale does
not shut and the ductus arteriosus does not seal:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-119.htm
ARE the medical services safe to be used and trusted:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-125.htm
Missing Blood to Chow-case-law, a $8 million suit to an early clamped child,
not revived with whole blood to stop internal oxygen debt to brain and
nervous system, quickly.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-174.htm
UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, DEC, 1948, and still to be upheld
and respected to all persons, regardless of age, sex, color, or race, or
mental or physical disadvantages, or marital status (rich vs poor members of
society).
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-144.htm
False use of Drugs, Oxytocin, said to stop bleeding when Platelets releasing
Serotonin do that, oxytocin only a muscle contraction hormone.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-432.htm
Causing Bodily harm, when no good truth for early clamping was a benefit to
the child or the mother by facts of empirical and substantiated facts of the
child's birth:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-359.htm
Exposing a child to be endangered:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-350.htm
Public Nuisance, any one member of society endangered by likely a false
policy, proven unnecessary as in most births, that doctors were trained and
did follow a false teaching not reasonable to be done, unless they had a
conflict of interest to harvest the babies' deprived blood, trapped in the
placenta, the allowance by the Executive Boards of most hospitals in Canada,
the USA, and other Nations, a duty to arrest those that allowed this to be
done on any one baby:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-195.htm
When a baby is protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada and
by Criminal Law to be properly investigated by the Coroner's for criminal
charges of medical malpractice for teaching and following endangering hasty
clamping and exploiting the babies for their stem cell blood:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-353.htm
Criminal Code for all persons to do their duty to the next person, no harm
done:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-349.htm
Preservation of life, a duty, and blood letting of babies every 2nd and 3rd
day for stem cells, taking 10 to 15 percent of total blood volume is
questionable, by the labs directing for the taking of samples...and doctors
alleging they did not know, but they ought to have, and the billings checked
for this code of sample taking, and where and how it was used, in Canada and
the States:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-348.htm
The American Doctor, V. Apgar stated early cord clamping to test drugs used
on babies,
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-429.htm
The Yurko Project...how this man is likely a setup medical scam as they
harvested a sick baby's cells, blood and organs:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-248.htm
Third World Countries do not tolerate Western Societies ways, and this is a
form of genocide by formula feedings, when they have no electricity or clean
water to use formulas or store them, correctly, without contamination, same
of hasty clamping taught them, their babies die of tetanus.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-217.htm
Vaccinations on anemic babies, under 24 months, experienced by Japan, they
do not vaccinate babies under 24 months, as a protection:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-181.htm
History of manipulation of male bias in medical societies and the
destruction of midwifery in the USA, controlled by the politicians and the
universities and doctors, who were then and today, not competently trained,
but impose policies that benefit, big corporations, drug companies, the
policies needing to be fore a judge as to soundness and facts of science and
medicine, observable as to hasty clamping on a functioning organ:
MIXED Ethnic group blood desired:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-142.htm
The USA compensated decreased mental efficiency of their students by going
on a semester system, Canada and Britain went on Remedial Reading books, and
testing of IQ's and special classes for those with IQ of below 90 and lower:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-207.htm
Criminal Charges on USA doctors, drug corporations and Canadian doctors, who
endangered any one person on the Canadian Blood issue:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-344.htm
Krever Report, a Commissioned Inquiry, a similar one on the care and
treatment of the pregnant lady and the information made available in biology
and health and science textbooks, is required as to what is missing and
false information, that are lies, and put there by those who knew better, or
ought to have:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-237.htm
Lung Disorders of babies early cord clamped: Hyaline Membrane Disease or
Respiratory Distress Syndrome (IRD)
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-340.htm
Midwives and Registered Nurse Midwives not competently or ethically trained
and better then the doctors involved in hasty clamping:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-342.htm
Brain Impairments caused to children by early cord clamping and labor and
birth drugs used, known since the 1960's in the USA, and in Britain in 1957:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-470.htm
Harmful birth positions, known to close the birth canal up to 30 percent,
known since 1913. These positions cause the child to be in distress and
release premature stem cells, that the doctors harvest by early clamping.
The baby cannot breath in bad birth positions. Correct are gravity, sideways
and forward sitting, not supine.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-442.htm
USA has disgraceful mortality of babies, likely being harvested for organs
and stem cells:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-424.htm
Experienced Medical Doctor, Obstetrician in Australia, say's don't clamp the
cord, declaration, original copy in my personal files:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-314.htm
Mercury is problematic to babies:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-477.htm
The American Citizen, Doris Haire warns third world countries of lost genius
potential of American Babies:
March 1, 1997, Birth Without Boarders Conference, Sponsored by UNICEF in
Chiang Mai, Thailand.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-499.htm
Stem Cell Research Reckless, can spread disease of rodents to man. Why not
criminal charges to those scientists doing this without common sense or
reason, and wasting millions in tax payers dollars in support of this
research, a scam, where the stem cells are not taking from the person's own
body, all cells beginning with a stem cell of its own kind. The Dolly the
Sheep killed and others like it, when the scientists were asked to confirm
Dolly's nose, hoof and ear print to be a true clone of the mother's. That
is the scam scientists are involved in apparently, and the politicians not
educated to know when they are being scammed for science claim of the tax
dollars.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-497.htm
One of the midwives advocating we get back to natural birth education, which
is no clamping or cutting of the umbilical cord, ever, unless of course the
cord tore or for placenta previa, which is rare. When it may happen it
requires an investigation of medical malpractice and recklessness.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-491.htm
Who can we trust, not apparently, our doctors or nurses, or lab technicians.
We need criminal charges to restore trust to the public at large, that the
doctors will stand as to Rule of Law for scams of the taxpayer's dollars and
endangering by false practices, to their memberships fined, and their
executives put in jail, for reckless and unnecessary risk taking in child
care services to the mother and the child.
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-490.htm
Thank you for any readers in cooperation of bringing these links to the attention of the appropriate
persons.
Some may be the International Human Rights Groups or even a mother concerned to spare her baby of
false medical care and treatment by a licensed medical person.
We need all the help we can get to do an investigation of the originators of false medical policies
the writing
of them, the publication of them, the upholding of them at each States
Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons.
Also to be investigated are the executives and those planning courses for the licensing by the Colleges
of
Midwives and the Associations of Nurses. These career ladies, must not be
excused of criminal silence and participation of false allowances of nurses
participating and failing to record by duty, the care and treatment and
condition of a cord clamped. Or the amount of blood that could have been
observed drained from the placenta and where the placenta was going and the
blood in it. They were willfully blind, and share a duty of
responsibilities, too.
All medical persons touching another birthing body and their baby, had a
duty to do their own research and to report false practices and teachings,
by any medical persons. This includes the ambulance medics, and their
trainers. They, too, were also taught to clamp off a pulsating and
functioning organ, and were specifically instructed to take the placenta and
the blood back to the hospital, assuming the State had ownership of that
organ and what happened to it without informed consent.
At the hospital, this is where it will be harvested without informed
consent, what happens to that organ and the blood in it. Signing a form for
appropriate care is not informed consent. Signing a form for discarding is
not informed consent what disposal means, burning or use of the organ in
research, stem cells, science research of cosmetics.
Invasion of privacy by taking genetic codes without informed consent, this
is the DNA of every cell from every tissue.
DNA invasion of the genetic codes is a form of violation of privacy, and
his a constitutional violation who has that information and without informed
consent, how it is being used.
We seek the information provided to Christian Groups. The are the first
source to protect each women planning a family to return to Natural Birth
Education and Practice, using warm water birth education, no drugs,
and no clamping of the child's lifeline, if they choose to complete their
birth with the same fortitude of conceiving a healthy baby by two
healthy parents, undrugged, and not chemically polluted by living in the
cleanest environment possible during conception and afterwards, to
having a natural birth, as to God's original design and purposes:
Copy to the Watch Tower, if they are Awake on this issue, that their own women
being now violated of the harvesting of their baby's blood used in stem cells,
cosmetics and transplants, secretly done, and without informed consent, because
they too trust blindly the medical groups are not out to deceive them.
The dealt with this issue in 1997 of the placenta and placenta blood harvested
but insisted simply talking to the doctor, an atheist or even a Christian who may not be taking oaths of no harm done.
They then are allowing violations of trust to be done by any medical persons, and not reported. There is no way of knowing if the medical persons will actually burn a Christian's baby's placenta. That is all trust, and no witnesses from their own families, and that is true of any organ removed from their bodies. The principal operation here is what the Christians do not know will not hurt them.
Few Christians are asking any questions, wanting to be willfully blind. When we all should be
alerted to find out what is actually
going on in each State, per hospital. That's trust, eh, in a deceptive society in the end times, with no exception of medical persons involved in secrecy and endangering to babies. If they do this at birth, what are they doing in other situations, if organs and tissues are not regarded with respect to an individuals belief's. That is disregard and disrespect to another's values and perceptive of best practice possible, least risk of harm, and not to use other's in an exploitive manner, no matter the worthy cause doctors think transplants are the answer not healthy living and a clean environment for planet earth. It is snip and cut and transplant and of course the bundle of money to do that extension of life and at what costs and to whom?
Most Christian groups have the same naive blind trust and the husbands or spouses of the Christian groups
are imposing on their women not to ask questions doctors or midwives or have a signed birth contract
what the medical persons cannot do to the woman's body or the baby's. What is happening, is
their own students, to be parents some day, are being required to trust blindly in the medical secular control of science,
medicine, practice and the law. But the duty, again, is no harm done and informed choice which includes a right to refuse a policy by the hospital, the nurses or the doctors or birth centers or ambulance medics. That rejection of their policies can only be by being informed of the false policies and training currently directing "all" babies be harvested by early clamping the policy directed by the experts, and they must be before the Courts, Judgment some day for harming babies with false policies in science, medicine and law.
his@wtbts.org
Watch Tower B & T Society, 25 Columbia Heights, Brooklyn, NY
11201 -2483 USA Phone: 718-560-4300.
Donna Young
President,
Natural Birth Education (and Practice)
