Low I.Q. Quotients may be associated with Clamping of the Umbilical Cord by Donna Young

        Low Intelligence Quotients (I.Q.) (A chart is below in green) , may be linked to oxygen debt caused by women having drugged births and related to the timing of the clamping of the child's umbilical cord, in most instances.  The babies are then injected with mercury substances contained in Vit. K, given to babies now low in platelets, and vaccination with Hep. B, an SD injection, and then injected with multiple mercury or metal contaminated vaccinations every two months, thereafter.

     An oxygen debt is described as "depletion of oxygen stored in the tissues and red blood cells. . . . Although the other tissues can accumulate an oxygen debt, it is essential for the brain to maintain its oxygen supply (New Scientist).  (Ref.  World Book Dictionary, Vol L-Z, p 1489, 1979).  Research by Donna Young  

This Url: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-523.htm

Home Page with a Table of Contents:  www.lotusbirth.com

(REVISED: March 20, 2004)

    Clamping off the pulsating umbilical cord stops 20 to 50 percent total blood volume being transfused into the baby's body. It is also believed by the low blood volume and the baby soon injected with mercury toxic vaccinations, Hep. B and possibly trace elements in the Vit. K given for a baby now low in platelets, predispositions the baby to brain damage, and put into the category of autism.  This disorder known as early infantile autism, occurred in about 1 child in 30,000 back in the 1970's. (Reference World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. A, p 913, 1979).  

    Today, researchers estimate the disorder of children under 11 years to be 1 in 110 children.  Increasing the risk of contamination in the child's body is the fat substances in the cells, low oxygen, and saturation of mercury in the child's key cells in the brain and central nervous system. These views are the theory of Donna Young.  Plus, I believe the mercury used in medicines were likely recycled and cheaper radioactive metals. Radioactive mercury  could be easily detected with Geiger counters.  Our society by firmer ethics could be protecting the babies at all levels of government. This is from our own communities to the Federal levels of those in the Food and Drug Branches.  That political financial interests is likely in the food and drug companies' shares. They would go down. Greed of money then allows the indifference of internal damages to any one member of the public. Those that govern, top down to each community are controlling the failure to investigate and prosecute. This is perceive to be from the head of every Federal government, world wide.

    Damage to the child by Immediate cord clamping. The visual damage to the child is visual.  One in sixteen babies have to be revived, and the placenta, a lung-blood-bag, can be visually drained of 80 to 180 ml of placenta blood that was deprived the child, weakening the baby of its right to security of persons.

    The motive the Federal levels of governments did this was the allowance of harvest the babies for a cheap source of experimental stem cell blood. The deception to the public that the hospitals were a safe place to birth one's baby, was by the use of political allowance of "active management" being the best practice possible.  It was only the best practice possible for profits and with the least expense to those with a political financial interest of personal gain.  Active Management was not best practice possible for the child, nor the mother, and was not done for least risk of harm.

    What happens when active management allows the deprivation of 20 to 60 percent total blood volume is that the infant's expanding lungs were in need of that blood volume, transfused from the placenta-lung-blood-bag, for the fetus circulation system to change over the neonate, where the lungs take considerable amount of blood, to oxygenized it to send it to the brain.

     In the fetus circulation system ( www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm ), the purest of oxygen goes directly to the brain and the placenta maintained fullness of pressure of the fetus circulations system.  Now in hasty clamping, we have low blood volume, and the injected mercury toxins in vaccinations are in the baby's blood stream and will go into the fat cells of the baby's brain, and key organs that absorb fat particles, sex organs, breast tissues, liver, kidney, spleen, and inside the blood vessels, themselves, and all cells.

    The full volume of blood and nutrients, enzymes and hormones, had been stopped by a clamping tool. The decision of the medical team, including the nurses who are accessories not witnesses (as they made no separate notes to be merely a witness on the child's own medical chart), was done by hospital allowance of questionable policies, set by the experts, the Gynecologists and Obstetricians in America and in Canada, and if true in these Nations, it was true in all countries.  See the retired bulletin #216, November 1995, ACOG, retired in January 2002, and the existing and intentionally indifference to the protection of the child, SOGC's Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89 May 2000.  SOGC policy continued by all levels of this organization in every Province and Territory in Canada, and allowed to continue with letters sent to all levels of government it was directing medical malpractice on the babies the doctors "choose" to clamp early at their own discretion and own moving of their elbow and hands to clamp a functioning and pulsating umbilical cord, a lifeline.

    There  was obvious and the evidence of volume of blood denied a child and that evidence was destroyed by the failure of the nurse, doctor and lab and the Administration board of the hospital to record how much blood was taken from each placenta of every baby born on their premises. The intent to conceal this visual facts were not accidental, just an oversight.  

    The amount of blood was to be used in experiments and sending to larger labs, and for a fee. All Administration hospitals must code their expenses and their incomes received, so documents of evidence of fact of collection of organs, the placenta and by whom and where they went or might have gone are a matter of records that can be investigated at each community hospital.

    To destroy evidence or records or to purger one's self when questioned are criminal offenses.  According to the Nation's laws, medical persons, and personnel of administration staff are not exempted for participation in harmful medical policies and secrets kept from the public, who could not protect themselves.  The organization of false information on a human's birth can be found in most biology textbooks, that are selected at each community level, and information that was discriminatory to the females reproduction to the birth of a healthy child, were directing a medical harm. They were directing for the human baby immediate umbilical cord clamping, this was done before the baby had established sufficient lung perfusion to be the healthiest child it could be, by the design of nature.

    The amount of blood deprived the child is about 4 to 6 ounces.  That can be 60 percent of 10 ounces of blood that a 9-pound baby makes, one ounce more then its weight (300 ml).  This nutritious blood, full of stem cells, white cells, red cells, proteins, enzymes, hormones, and more, was the trapped blood in the placenta. The amount of blood, again, both medical persons(s) and the nurses failed to report on the medical charts of the child as a record of fact, and a duty to have done so, the failure at their own peril: the condition of the cord when clamped, red, firm and pulsating, and amount of blood drained from the placenta, and the fact the placenta was sent to research or cosmetic companies, once drained, and the placenta blood taken of some 4 to 6 ounces of blood, and practically used.  All this was without true informed parental consent.  

Facts of the Volume of Blood made by an infant, from conception to birth:

    The 9-pound full term 9-month gestation baby only makes a total volume of blood of 10 ounces.  One can see how a healthy baby would be endangered to oxygen debt of 50 percent volume deprived.  The child unless given immediate revival of blood expanders, often Ringer's Lactate, would go into cardiac arrest and the blood vessels would collapse for lack of volume and pressure. Where the vessels may collapse is likely the brain, least likely to get the oxygen and volume and pressure to maintain physiological health for the child.  

    The facts revealed in the Canadian research indicates one in sixteen babies are being revived today. To quote:  

Neonatal Resuscitation:   The NRP guidelines ,  Elliott Robert D,.MD, FRCPC, Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa Hospital - General Site, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Web Site:   http://www.anesthesia.org/winterlude/w195/w195_7.htm    ( One in sixteen babies will require resuscitation*

    The facts of policies being used as alibis leading to many medical persons harvesting babies with one excuse after another, and avoiding legal criminal charges for endangering a baby, by various active criminal codes that apply to the duty of all persons, whether a medical person or not, can be found in these policies by experts:    

SOGC, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89, May 2000. http://sogc.medical.org/sogcnet/sogc_docs/common/guide/pdfs/ps89.pdf   (Tel: 416-596-5000, Fax: 416-596-5892 ; Address: Journal SOGC, Maclean Hunter Healthcare/Sante, 777 Bay Street, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5W 1A7. (search for policies on the Internet). email:  Denise Massey ;   dmassey@sogc.com

    The facts that infants are then continued to be blood-let, likely for stem cell harvesting, is in the Canadian research, as well, at

•     Canadian Medical Association Journal 1992; 147(12); 1781-1786 Reference No. FN92-03, Revision in Progress March 2002, Guidelines for transfusion of erythrocytes to neonates and premature infants . To Quote:

•     From 10% to 15% of the blood volume in seriously ill neonates is often removed for laboratory tests over 2 to 3 days.

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.

We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.

    Press releases are available on the failure of students in the Province of Ontario. The test results indicated over 65 percent of students cannot pass a standard achievement examination.  This indicates I.Q. has diminished in that Province where doctors are trained to do immediate cord clamping as as standard of practice.  They do not remain in that Province, but set up practices such as British Columbia.

    In Ontario, midwives are trained to also make up excuses of any "fear" they can think of to early clamp another's child.  It was generally thought a midwife did gentle birth, but not so today, and cannot be trusted any more the the business doctor that clamps the cord for his/her own time convenience.  The Time Convenience was a stated defense by the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons as to a failure to investigate a c-section surgeon routinely doing immediate cord clamping on all babies, following Policy #89, May 2000.  

    The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, by best practice possible least risk of harm, with evidence of letters sent, would not investigate a surgeon doing immediate cord clamping.  The reason they gave for no investigation of policies if best one were used, was the defense given in MDConsult.  This is an American web services of clinical studies and opinions of doctors. They used from that services, the quotation of Dr. Gabbes who stated the doctors could clamp the pulsating cord at their convenience, and said the blood deprived the child was not important.  Well, not important to whom?

    Even private corporation sue if they do not think they will get full expectations of profits by some unfair interference with their right to do so.  Well, then why not criminal and civil actions against harmful practices to babies who are deprived even one flow of one blood cell or nutrient that they were entitled to from the placenta to their expanding lungs?

    Why would doctors risk endangering the potential genius of any child by hasty clamping, or the health and well being of any child by oxygen debt to any one brain cell or nerve cell?  This risk taking for harvesting of the baby's stem cells and nutrients in the placenta is long over due to be justified before a Judge and Jury, if that can ever be justified in sound mind.  The only benefit to early clamping is if for some reason the cord tore or for placenta previa.  These reasons, too, along with any other excuse or reason, must be investigated for medical meddling and interference of the baby's right to equal security of person and equal protection to being protected by our law courts for civil and/or criminal violations to their persons.

BRAIN AND NERVE CELLS ARE TO LAST A LIFE TIME, IF NOT DAMAGED, ABOUT 100 YEARS:

      It is known that nerve cells can be delicate one cell guiding the activities of 10,000 other cells.  Damage to that once cell may impair the child's enjoyment for quality of life.  The human brain is composed of some 10 billion nerve cells, more or less alike, which interact in various ways.  The nerve cells conducts impulses; neutron.  The nervous system consists of the brain, the spinal cord, and the nerve cells and fibers that extend throughout the bodies of man and the higher animals.  The human nervous system has several billion neurons, all connected with one another. If cell nerve body is damage or if the damaged nerve fiber is in the central nervous system, the whole neuron will degenerate.  In such areas and depending how many cell nerves are destroyed by drugs, parasite, toxin, or oxygen debt, will depend on the child's degree of impairment.  These diseases are associated with nerve damaged cells:  Epilepsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuritis, Neuropathology, Palsy, Paralysis, Parkinson's Disease, Physiological Psychology, Plexus, Reflex Action, Sciatica, Senses, Shingles, Spine problems, and the increase of Attention Deficit Disorders, Autism, eating and sleep disorders.  

COMPROMISED PHYSICALLY SEEN DAMAGED CHILDREN --

    ONLY THE MOST PSYCHICALLY HANDICAPPED ARE BEING ASSISTED AND

         NOT THOSE WITH INTERNAL METABOLIC DISORDERS:

    Case-Law Examples of Compromised children of oxygen debt to various cells is the Chow and Ing Case Laws, Ontario, Canada, handled by Sommers and Roth.  While these two civil suits were successful (Chow award about $8 million and Ing about $14 million), these court cases did not change practice.  The motive of no change in use of tools in deliveries and hasty clamping must be the billions of dollars in research and use of stem cells in transplants.  Experimental procedures cost more then do regular and standardize care treatment and practice.

AT WHAT PRICE DOES SOCIETY ALLOW THE BABIES TO BE SACRIFICED OF THEIR BLOOD:

      At what price does society sacrifice the babies for science research in stem cells.  Stem cells are merely developing tissues, where taken, be they red blood, white blood, brain or lung tissues.  In this case the stem cells are being harvested unethically, by inadequately or unethically trained medical persons.  These include midwives trained to clamp the cord for any reason at all, to match the training of the doctors. The teaching of early cord clamping with indifference to the child's well being has come from the experts, who willfully continued in this harvesting of babies, for their policies, that were conveniently allow the child to be vulnerable to harvesting.  The experts were the executives of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, SOGC. Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89 May 2000, directed early and immediate cord clamping on all babies, and for no good medical reason or fact of good medicine.

    These "actively managed" babies, a routine of current trained medical person(s), are likely to be the victims of heart and lung, disorders and have other latent internal metabolic distresses, and brain seizures, and learning and behavior problems that are not diagnosed until the child is of school age.

     If you wish to advance to unassisted birth links by Laura Shanley,  they are in red , below.  Other comments follow the chart on I.Q. Quotients.

INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT RATINGS

     If children are not interrupted from their umbilical cords, these babies have then the best opportunity to be left with their fullest genius potential and to good health, or optimal health.  Not so, the babies who are unfairly early cord clamped, and drugged during labor and during birth. As to taking their placenta blood, by harvesting after early clamping, the babies may be specifically selected at birth by their size, premature babies targeted for the fact they have the most stem cells, so size is a factor, next is ethnic group, if the parents are of a mixed race, then  sex, color, race, and social status, are factors.

    Bias, and we are all biased to some degree, can be if the parents are from the working class status or the middle to upper ruling class.  Bias are to the human race, and deception by concealing our motives for whatever we do, to justify our actions in the treatment of others.  

    Some persons, if they belong to a group, and are self-regulating, like the medical groups, they may set a policy, not of logical merits, that is used as a ready alibi and have set clinical studies and opinions of one or two medical doctors or groups, to attempt to avoid criminal prosecution if any one person of their group follow, voluntarily that study, or policy, as alleging a standard of practice to avoid civil and criminal accountability.  Particularly, when the standard can be taken into a court of law and Discovered, harmful, not logical or practical, and was in fact, imposed on another's child, without them have opportunity to know the risk taken and to avoid that practice, totally.

    This information of I.Q. Quotient was from:  You and Your Health, Volume One,  Harold Shryock, M.A., M.d., et al, page 433, 1985, Pacific Press Publishing Association, ISBN 0-8163-0533-1

INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT RATINGS

    Classification                    I.Q. Range                            Population Incidence

    Genius:                             above 140,                                   0.25%.  

    Superior:                          110-140                                       19.75 %.

    Normal:                               90 - 110                                     60.00 %  

    Total likely above average tax payers                                80.00 percent of the population

                                        Mildly Retarded:                  70 - 90                                        19.00 %    (1/2 of these are likely to be the                                                                                                               unemployed)

                            Moron:                                  50 -70                                              00.75 %     (likely, unemployable)

                    Imbecile:                              20-50                                         00.25%  (likely, Institutionalized)

                                        Idiot:                              Below 20                                 Negligible 10%     Institutionalized

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Comments on endangering babies.

    The medical persons who are  following "active management" are using for their doing so, policies and clinical studies.  What is absent is healthy babies born to mothers who had natural birth education and practice.  Such sound care in child birth do not get put up on the controlled medical research information, such as MDConsult and the Cochrane Library Collaboration, and others like that.  The medical consumer then does not have fairness in knowing by whom the healthiest babies are being delivered and to whom.

    When the medical person(s) knew they intentionally did hasty clamping and did not inform the mothers of the drugs risk from morphines and oxytocin, they continued to avoid their responsibilities by failing to have the mother's consent for them to have monitored active management in long term studies of the child's abilities to achieve and their ease of learning.  Many children, victimized by active management, have a life time of struggles, not so of those babies born by natural birth education and practice.  Many of these already impaired children were further victimized by early vaccinations, while the baby was yet in an anemic condition.  In Japan, they stopped vaccinating their harvested babies, (yet early cord clamped) until they were at least 24 months old, and the babies had in most cases, improved their blood volume.  

    Babies that are continually growing may take a long time to replace their deprived blood at birth, harvested by doctors doing hasty clamping.  Only the unethical medical persons do the harvesting of babies, by secret intent of concealed motives they provide the placenta to be taken for draining by their hospital's labs.  In this manner, doctors work as an agent of the hospital, and sometimes they do the harvesting for personal financial gain of coded billings to those they send the blood samples too, and for the collection of an organ they sell to drug companies, and cosmetic companies.  This is likely the real reason doctors are insistent they do cosmetic removal of the placenta in the hospitals, they are gaining, personally, a financial gain.  

The hospital or the medical persons also sell the foreskin they removed on the trend and ritual of doing circumcisions on most babies. This is only done by not true informed consent on the babies of most uneducated parents.  These uneducated parents, mothers and fathers, did not know that circumcision is not a medical need, but merely cosmetic, and high risk taking of infections to their babies, even their life can be lost by a needles ritual and trend.

The medical persons are merely offering fees for service to the business doctor.  They are not required to disclose nor to factually tell the truth this is not a required service, but cosmetic, and harmful and risk taking to the child imposed on within 2 or 3 days, after birth.  That is the likely reasons more boy children have autism then do girls.  

While anemic, after hasty clamping, the babies were more vulnerable to side effects of the drugs, and more risk of virus getting into their blood stream.  The babies are being put into shock, no wonder autism soon follows.  Other babies have undetected heart, lung, and brain disorders. Many are stroke victims, more or less, so they do not progress in development and muscle control as well as other babies, not so treated after birth.

 Many babies suffer with long term effects of metals in their bodies by the injections, they received at birth, Vit. K, and Hep B, then within two months of age, more vaccinations, sometimes 3 or more vaccinations in one day, or combined.  Parents are just not educated to have had their babies blood volume and pressure checked, and iron overload, my have caused the medical person to think iron was okay, when the child was actually nutrient deprived of immunities. The iron overload an indication of low blood volume of too many red cells dying after hasty clamping and oxygen depletion to the baby, if oxytocin was injected in the mother. All this is in research and in my references of facts babies are endangered by Active Management, the most commonly used method of child care used around the world.  It should be banned, only to have the patience and care of natural birth education and practice for more gentle births.

There is much to consider to avoid the use of these trained medical persons to handle your baby's birth, and go for hand's off, unassisted birth, you cannot do much more damage then the what the doctors and midwives are doing by active management, they are only trained in.  They are not trained in low cost, natural birth education or practice, nor do they want to be so, as it takes more patiences and the control is all in the mother's hands, not theirs.

    Many medical persons continue to be trained and continue to do the questionable routine episiotomy on the mothers they have placed on their backs, and have knowingly, since 1913,  closed the mother's birth canal up to 30 percent.  This supine birth positions, provided the ease in which medical persons, including midwives, mostly registered-nurse-midwives, imposing the cutting of the body, as well as following that procedure with questionable hasty umbilical cord clamping. This is most awful training and most questionable why it continues, particularly, when the women are not allowed to have this information of right of refusal in a Signed Birth Contract what cannot be done to their persons, by a medical persons.  

NO LONG TERM FOLLOW UP OF THE SIDE EFFECTS OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT: DRUGS, CUTTING, EARLY CLAMPING AND VACCINATIONS GIVEN AN ANEMIC CHILD:

      The test of the child's abilities at school age are then not followed or the parents told the probable cause one of the children has more difficulties and pain to learn then other children, in their family, that did NOT have this done to them.  The child born in a taxi cab most lucky to avoid such "active management" and likely the most abled of all babies, if merely kept warm after birth and the child's placenta not detached.

    Prevention of oxygen debt to the brain and other organs may be best done by informed and educated unassisted births. These are now deemed essential to protect the mother and the child.  Please see link to Laura Shanley, in red, below  and other links regarding water births, and much more.  by Donna Young

WHY UNASSISTED BIRTHS? Even if you have a birth persons present:

     Mothers would be wise to have unassisted births today, they just ask their midwife to stay in another room, and only come if invited or called.  I have provided some links following this article or help mothers be encouraged to attempted an unassisted and undrugged birth. Undrugged births can be best achieved in warm water births.

    It is important to know that an unassisted birth may not necessarily improve the I.Q. Quotient of the child, if early umbilical cord clamping is imposed on the child's lifeline.

    Many mothers are not educated, and while they have a pleasant home birth, a warm water birth, their baby may still be violated by hasty clamping if they have had a corrupted taught medical person, instructing them to clamp a pulsating and functioning organ, or pressured them to deprive their baby of its full blood volume to donate and give the blood to another's needs, rather then protect their own baby's needs and legal rights to be the best baby it  can be and healthiest it can be.

    The false teaching instructs and in a criminal fashion, even if the baby lives, to interfere with the child's lifeline, that is the child's circulation system to receive their own blood into their now expanding lungs.  It is a serious violation to the child to deprive it of a quality of life by stopping its essentials of life, oxygenated blood.  The child is entitled to every drop of blood it wants to receive and adults interrupting that should explain themselves, before a Judge.  Harshly, that includes the mother and father to justify why they were mislead and allowed their baby to be early cord clamped, the Judge ruling any penalty or compensation to their own child...respect no harm done to any citizen born in Canada.  The babies, by Rule of Law, are to be protected by duty of all adults.     Adults included and do not exclude the parents.

    The greatest duty to do no harm is to the educated skilled person expected to know better, or ought to, by their capacity to do research and to do logic and keep facts of records of the reason an organ was interrupted from its natural function.  So, a pulsating organ is a functioning organ with logical merits why it is still pulsating, serving the infant's needs.

    Interruption of what is natural may well have motives hidden, and that is why trials in both civil and criminal bring these possible motives why some children were violated, but not all. Whose babies were being imposed on to give blood to science, research or to another's needs. Babies do not have a duty to make allowances for others, neither should their legal guardian, the parents, be participating in depriving their baby current needs of a designed volume of blood to transfuse from the placenta's previous work, gas exchanges, to the child's now expanding lungs, to do the same work and with the same volume and pressure of blood as did the placenta do the gas exchanges.

THE GOAL MUST NOT BE TO PROVIDE JUST A LIVING BABY, BUT A HEALTHY BABY WITH ALL ITS FULLEST POTENTIAL LEFT INTACT:

    Just being a living baby is not satisfactory.  That is not meeting the required duty to the child, no harm or endangering, that was not done as benefit to the child, evident by facts, that can be revealed in a court of law, as being a fact finder if the child was endangered by any adult, including the parents, the legal guardian of the child.

    The Court will need to know how factually informed the mother was to have made an informed consent to endanger her baby by drugs crossing the placenta and or to her informed consent and for what reason she allowed, or the father, the child to be deprived 4 to 6 ounces of blood, and possibly the evidence of that fact destroyed by an obstruction of justice, the facts hidden off the infant's own medical chart, what the volume of blood was deprived the child if permission was given for any medical person to interrupt the child's circulation system.

    The endangering to the child is then unhealthy jaundice, there is no good jaundice, it is all abnormal indicating a disorder not natural to the baby.  Overload of iron is was factor caused by early cord clamping, then anemia of shortages of nutrients of the placenta blood; and if the blood had become toxic by the drugs given the mother, in absence of safer and better options to deal with labor contraction discomfort.  How well advised and informed was the mother to give informed consent of all risks involved in "active management" vs natural birth education and practice that does not endanger the mother or the child during birth.

DUTY OF THE LAW IS TO ENFORCE RULE OF LAW, NO EXCEPTIONS:

    This is not an issue, of any mother's attitude, "My baby, and I'll do as it please with its care in my jurisdiction."  The duty is no harm to the baby, and a legal obligation not a choice or option.  Crimes to the child or endangering to the child by the parent have a liability of investigation even to professional parents, that may be involved in harvesting of their baby's blood for a rainy day or to give to another's baby's needs, at the expense of their own child.

    Therefore, "My baby" my choice, may not be so, if a judge hears of the harvesting of babies by the consent of parents.  No parent can consent to endanger a child, even if a medical person is suggesting they endanger or weaken their baby.  The medical persons has a greater duty not do suggest any child be weakened by blood -letting or harvesting, at birth.  The duty is to all involved, educators and the practitioner of that teaching to be ethical and know false teaching from truth, evident in the fact of what amount of blood was left in the cord.  Obstruction of justice is if the medical persons or the parents allowed the evidence to be willfully destroyed and the facts not recorded on the child's own medical chart, so the child, at a later date can be compensated, legally, for any wrong doing to his/her person.

    Ignorance is no excuse by law.  We must remember, then, a crime is a crime no matter who does it.  Parents are not excused in participation before or after the fact.  After the fact, and they do not report the crime may make them an accessory to the fact the child was violated during or after birth, and any birth witness present.  That brings civil accountability to witnesses that did not record or report what they saw, or so I believe.

    Therefore, no parent can allow, knowingly,  a medical stranger into their home for child care assistance that they intend to stop the child's natural blood circulation by a tool, being used as a weapon, that is not necessary and not for the benefit of the child.

DUTY IS TO THE CHILD:

     All ADULTS are duty bound and none can Legally waive a duty of care to the child's needs of entitlement to no harm done.  A child can have harm done internally by oxygen debt to the brain caused by interruption of the umbilical cord and the placenta and means to oxygen from the mothers body, while the baby is yet an fetus.  

    After birth, the baby must still have legal rights to  blood from the placenta, as his/her own organ.  The placenta is not the mother's organ...and therefore she cannot, legally deprive the baby's of its own organ benefit, that blood in it.  Not without justification before a judge why she endangered her baby to I.Q. deficiency, that will show up years later, and can be traced back to drugs during labor and birth, and to the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord.

    The law deals with ignorance and false directives in child care and those who are doing it.  There are sections in the Criminal Codes for those directing others to harm another.  The sentence I believe is two to ten years, and should be upheld on medical directives of harm by all university professors involved in curriculums that are false but used by the not dissenting to those who directed it as experts.

MEDICAL EXPERTS ARE NOT EXCUSED TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR MAKING A POLICY THAT ENDANGERS, NEEDLESSLY:

    The experts to be identified are those making the policy of curriculum, those identified as the Obstetricians and Gynecologists. There whole group must be fined as to silence and not reporting unreasonable directives to harm a baby by early umbilical cord clamping, now revealed by lay persons on the internet, and those in authority to take away the license of any medical person involved in false teaching have not done so.  They cannot do so, perhaps, until the matter goes before a trial, a criminal trial for the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons to take away the license of the group of doctors that approved immediate and early clamping done to all babies.  

    The experts must be first licensed to be an expert or to continue, by the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons.   If they all corrupted and were in a conspiracy of allowing false teachings, then the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons must also be equally charged of criminal medical directives to any one baby, born in Canada, or elsewhere. Why. Because the College of Physicians and Surgeons entered into contract to protect the public, and they cannot disallow the protection to the birth mother or the newborn baby.

      That would be a violation to the rights of duty by criminal and civil law and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Status of a professional group does not excuse them from Rule of Law.  It is mandatory that the criminal codes be kept by the Officers of the Justice system, so false medical directives must be before the Courts.  Why it is not, must be questioned of the Justice Officers, the lawyers, called to the bar to see that no injustice goes unopposed.  They cannot have the ruling classes, even if doctors excuse themselves to be above the law, excused when they are directing harmful birth practices to be allowed in all hospitals, large and small, private or public, to endangering needless any one person.

    The I.Q. quotient potential of the child, by the circulation system interruption will be impaired to the degree of lost nutrients and oxygen to key organs, the brain, the nervous system, the heart, and the lungs.  If any are damaged there can be infections to the brain, as well.

    Following the birth, that was most satisfactory the mother, we must also assure that her babies is not being willfully being Constitutionally violated of equal protection to the child by security of person.  Not all mothers have normal love their baby, a mother, recently in New York, 2003, planned a premature birth by going up into the mountains and having vigorous sex, brought on a month premature child, who was immediately cord clamped and thus harvested for more quantity and quality of stem cells that she sold to a rich relative.

     Her intent was concealed by the fact the medical societies are already doing this secretly and not with informed intent of the parents participating, knowingly, of harvesting their babies.  Homebirths can target the babies by the same unethical practices that have being going on in major hospitals, that secretly, used the placentas for extra incomes when they sold them to cosmetic companies, without informed consent.  This was after the hospitals used the drained blood deprived the infant by early cord clamping.  

    Many  hospitals, in Canada and in the United States, now their unethical practices are being followed world wide, involved the deceitful practices and training of early umbilical cord clamping.  The hospitals, large and small, were not protecting the medical consumer of best practice possible, and least risk of endangering to the child born in their maternity wards.  The hospitals boards, and many of their ethics committees guided by one or two more lawyers, were allowing doctors to do early clamping on most babies.  They then allowed the baby's deprived blood to be used in their resources of their lab work, and /or to be sold to larger labs.  This was all hidden and secret, and no arrests, to this date, have been done on those involved, and allowed this, or looked the other way, and remained silent.

    The facts of early cord clamping and taking the baby's deprived blood without informed consent, has been reported, by the Hon Gary Mar of Alberta, the Minister of Health and Wellness in that Province.  He allowed the false practices to continue on endanger the baby, when so advised.  And he has training as a criminal lawyer, and may still be a member of the Law Bar.

    The offense, were known to take place, and with it continuing, no doubt, to this day, was at the Royal Alexander Hospital, in Edmonton.  This is just one example of what is happening across Canada, in large and small hospitals.  If true, in Canada, it is true in the USA, and around the world, as false trends of early clamping for harvesting of the babies continues, the policies being set by the experts, the obstetricians and gynecologists, who the leaders of this directives require by justice, the Rule of Law, they be brought before a judge, and all those who did not govern ethical and correct science and training of all medical persons, that would deliver or assist in the delivery of another's baby.

DEATH RATES OF PREMATURE BABIES AND ANY BABY:

      The death rates for premature babies in the Royal Alexander Hospital after early clamping and continued blood sampling of an already weakened premature baby, should be done by the Justices of that Province.  This is a matter of right over wrong that no injustice goes unprotested or uninvestigated of corruption in our medical services of harvesting babies, or any other person for their organ or blood tissues.

    It is not a matter that the parents bring the charges, they do not know better.  It is a duty of the Provinces of Canada to initiate the investigation by Rule of Law and existing criminal codes, that do not exempt doctors from doing unnecessary threatening services, that any one person did not receive a benefit.  Babies do not receive a benefit from early umbilical cord clamping, unless the cord had torn or for placenta previa.  These two conditions are rare, and when they happen, an investigation of medical negligence is required, also.

     In most cases, the parents were not told the best practice is to leave the pulsating umbilical cord alone, even if their baby lived after hasty clamping. The baby was likely a victim of iron overload, following hasty clamping, this creates a jaundice condition of yellow-green skin and yellow-green eye whites.  Anemia of nutrients soon follows the child as it grows and has low blood volume and pressure.  These babies have faster beating heart to try to get what little oxygen there is in the blood cells, but many are limited in their abilities as to this needless endangering imposed on them, at birth, to harvest stem cells for research.

    This threat to the babies is being taught at all colleges, and universities training ambulance medics, nurses, practical nurses, and the doctors. And, in some cases doulas and birth educators.  All are currently trained by false policies set by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC).  

    These are the false policies of no good reasons or logic to direct hasty umbilical cord clamping, when ethical doctors of the past were trained, leave the cord alone, until all pulsation ceased, if clamped or cut at all.  The pioneers did not tie or cut the cord, for healthy babies, with no blood infections, and their babies had no low blood volume or pressure, or low immunities.  Such babies live today, over 89 years of age, and it is due to unassisted births and no interference of their lifeline, the umbilical cord, in most cases.

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION PAST DUE:

    Criminal Investigation, Sections 217, and Common Nuisance and sections of Bodily Harm or the threat of it, may yet bring justice by Rule of Law to any and all medical persons, from the ambulance medic to the surgeon and including the nurses, too, that delivered babies and with secret intentions for a variety of false myths and reasons, clamped the pulsating cord.  

    The babies I.Q. quotient then was risked to below average, while the baby lived, and looked "apparently" normal.  These children then later had eye, ear, nose, heart, lung, and learning and behavior difficulties and their parents did not know the likely cause of these impairments to their children.  

PARENTS UNEDUCATED MAY CLAMP A PULSATING CORD BY IGNORANCE, BUT IGNORANCE IS NOT A LEGAL EXCUSE FOR CRIMINAL OR CIVIL DAMAGES, WHETHER BY A PARENT OR A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL INTERRUPTING THE CIRCULATION SYSTEM ON ANY HUMAN BEING :

    Duty requires reasonable care, even by home birthing mothers, who may be unassisted.  If the mothers are not ethical with their intent, or the father of the child of his intent, to protect the child to full placenta blood transfusion into the baby's lungs, they may harm their own babies. They may then adopt out a problematic child, or seek compensation from others for any impairments and higher cost of education to educate such a compromised child.  In some cases, civil and criminal remedies, are justified for the child to have the compensation for their care, for they are the victims of  crime or an injustice, whether it was caused by the negligence of a medical persons, or by the ignorance of the parents.  In any case, those directing an false trend of care and treatment to the child, must be identified as to their participation or false teaching directives be included in the damages.

    Those directing medical care outside of natural birth education and practice are the biology school teachers and their choosing of their biology textbooks directing hasty clamping on the human baby's umbilical cord.  That cannot be excused to biology school textbooks or the teachers instructing from them and directing false pages read by their students, who may think they are to be tested on repeating that false information on an examination.

    Good science and good medicine do not interfere with the child's circulation system.  Properly educated mothers and fathers instruct them to patently wait for the placenta to be expelled, and to wrap the placenta in a clean towel, and keep untied and uncut until all pulsation has ceased in the cord.  The cord will then be white, silver, limp and not pulsating, and the child's lips and tongue will not be blue.  The child already wrapped in a warm towel, too.  

GOOD PARENTS WANT THE BEST FOR THEIR BABY - THAT MAY BE A SIGNED BIRTH CONTRACT FOR A PRIMAL NATURAL BIRTH:

    Most partents want the healthiest baby possible and would not knowingly conceive a child while either of them are under the influence of drugs, noted to be harmful to conception of a healthy baby, and most want to have a protect birth for the child not to suffer birth damage, or injury to the mother, herself.

     If a conception was of a planned birth, parents need not worry about the child being normal; but many parents are not educated how to have a healthy birth and do not know the doctors, and nurses are unethically trained to seek to harvest their baby's blood by early cord clamping.  If the parents have read false biology textbooks, and most of those I have recently read, are false, they would not be competently, but misguided and would clamp a red, firm and pulsating umbilical cord causing their baby to be brain oxygen debt deprived, as well as the lungs, and heart and other internal organs.

    Their baby, in spite of a healthy planned conception and good health habits of the mother during the 9-month gestation period, will yet be damaged by this oxygen debt.  All because they did not know to leave the umbilical cord alone, and attempt the pioneer lotus birth method of child care.

    The Child's Apgar Scores that will indicate revival of the child are sent to the government on the information not seen by the parent, but are sent in from the hospital or by the doctor, as to the care and treatment of the child.  Children with Apgar scores of 7 or less are the most likely to have the most difficulty in memory capacity and handling the public education system.  

    Long term studies until the child is an adult as to the timing of the clamping of the cord and internal metabolism disorders are not intended to be kept by the persons who interfered with the child's umbilical cord at birth.  No where, in the world, from he past to the present, did the good faith of any medical person, or medical nurse, record the facts they clamped a child's lifeline when it was red, firm and still pulsating and that the child's lips and tongue were yet blue, when the circulation of the child was cut off.  

    This was intentional by the training of the medical persons and it was intentional instruction in most biology text books. The biology textbooks being careful to indicate this choosing of care was directed explicitly to the "human" baby.  It was not a directed policy at any other mammal.  

    This indicates they knew better that if they did not weaken any other mammal, they were selective choosing whose babies the middle to upper middle class birth educators were instruction other person to impose their decision and reasons for it on another person's infant.  This, of course, would have long term disabilities, subtle to serious, of internal problems and oxygen debt to major organs, particularly the brain and the central nervous system. The brain and nerve system do not tolerate oxygen debt, as well as other organs where tissues are replaced in days.  Not so the damaged brain cells and nerve cells, that are there for life. Once impaired they are not replaced.  

Laura Shanley Bornfree! - The Unassisted Childbirth Page   

http://unassistedchildbirth.com

Laura Shanley's Articles birth stories, & poetry

http://laurashanley.com

The Waterbirth Website

http://www.well.com/user/karil/

    see Comments (1)  by Donna Young below on logic of warm water births, and no clamping or tying off the pulsating umbilical cord, at the end.  

______________________________

The Association for Pre- & Perinatal Psychology and Health

Directors of APPPAH 2003  

Birth and Violence, The Societal Impact:
The Conference

http://www.birthpsychology.com/apppah/dirs.html

Until recently, neither psychology nor medicine has given adequate attention to very early development, in the false belief that prenates and neonates could not feel, remember, learn, or be influenced by these experiences. This was a tragic miscalculation that made guinea pigs of us all. For the last two decades we should have known better. A wave of studies revealed the sensitivity, awareness, and intelligence of newborn behavior. Over the same period, studies of the baby in the womb also revealed the same qualities."

___________________________________

see comments (2) on Gentle Birth and evidence biology textbooks and authors directed harmful rough care of the newborn "human" baby and directed clamping off their pulsating cord, depriving the human baby of up to 60 percent total blood volume, weakening some babies, at the discretion of the medical persons, who secretly concealed the amount of blood deprived a child, and with participation of most nurses, too.

by Donna Young  

    ______________________________________________

The Association for Pre- & Perinatal Psychology and Health

Directors of APPPAH

2003  

___________________

Donna Young's website on the dangers of Early Cord Clamping and a lot more!

NEW Link   www.lotusbirth.com

(1)  Warm water births comments:

    The Good of Policy #71, December 1998 of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) stated no harm done by warm water births.  There were no rules why you can't birth in water.  No nurse in any hospital, because they are lacking training can deny your use of warm water, even if you bring your own pool.  If it looks like a fight, birth unassisted in your own home, and write a letter of unqualified services in your community, and be sure to name the uneducated nurses and doctors on this issue, for failing to know history and repeat it during current times.  Their policies, again, cannot be imposed on you by any uneducated nurse not educated on warm water births.  Remember, this is traditional to all women.  The pioneers in Western Civilization used warm water births in the 1900's.  You can too.

      The pioneer methods were buried in the USA and Canadian societies behind closed doors.  This began when doctors and their own trained nurses moved in on the baby business. The doctors sought the support by the politicians who support this institutionalized births beginning when the blood typing was done in 1901.  In developing nations, women did not loose the right to birth unassisted in their own homes.

     I suggest the closed door births, where they were a family affair in the homes, were contrived to the opportunity of taking the placenta blood by early clamping of the child's lifeline.  Who would be the wiser.  The women could not see what was being done to them, and the husbands were not present.  And today, the husbands are as clueless on this issue as the birthing women.

    Even the pioneer women did not discuss such matters of birth and were directed not too. By chance, when I was age 14, I heard this is how my grandmother gave birth, and others like her, no tying or cutting off the cord.  They had no navel infected babies, no blood infections, and their babies were not injected with Vit K, as their babies had natural blood clotting factors as they had all their blood.  Their babies were not anemic, or jaundice, caused by overload of iron, caused by death of too many red cells.

    Natural  birth education and practice should be taught from knee high.  The important issue is to respect all mammals placentas that they are not interrupted to take the creatures strength way, by depriving the creature, human or animal, of their blood volume.  The strength and longevity is in the nutrients of the blood.

    In Water Birth, SOGC only stated two important facts to be known:

        (1) not to have the water to warm or too cold, and

        (2) to bring the baby's face out of the water immediately.

    Why?

    Logically for the reason that babies are mammals not fishes...you do not know for sure if the placenta is still providing the oxygenated blood, or just giving the blood transfused into the baby's expanding lungs.  Why take chances, allow for the baby's to breathe when the lungs have the blood there for oxygenation, and do not clamp or cut the cord until the placenta is expelled.

    It is wiser to do this the Pioneer Lotus Birth, that follows gentle warm water births.  The warmth and no clamping keeps the baby a Biological Reciprocal Sealed-Unit.  There is no rush to remove the placenta or cord, even if the baby needed an operation or tests.

     Keep the baby together with the placenta, wrapped in separate warmed towels.  This is true for all babies, including for c-section babies and premature babies.  

    All babies have this legal right of security of person that they get their placenta blood and no other.  Do not harvest your baby.  

    The blood is for immediate need and optimal health.

    One day, your child will ask you about the birth and the timing of the clamping of their umbilical cord.  They will associate any minor heart, stroke, lung problems to blood deprivation of 20 to 50 percent total blood deprivation.  Will it have been by their own mother's decision that the child expected to be made with informed consent, an educated position of protection to the baby's legal rights to be the best it could be, but deprived if shy of essential nutrients in the child's original blood, then deprived, if so?

      If that is not the case, the mother was not properly advised of deprivation of essential nutrients to the child's immediate needs, I advocate a Writ be filed in the child's own name.    Appropriate care forms signed  is not informed consent. Such methods to deceive the mother she accepts blindly whatever is done to her body or the baby gives no real protection to the midwife, doctor, doula, that did not warn or counsel of the proper care and legal rights and duty to the child.

    Faking reasons to interrupt the child's circulation system, must be shown factual of need to be a benefit to the child, the owner of the placenta and the blood inside the placenta.  It is not the mother's organ or the mother's blood, but the child's, the true legal owner, and none other.  No one can waive a duty of care to the child, not a judge, not the mother, not the doctor, not a policy to endanger, either.  

     Varieties of false reasons are given by clever midwives, and other medical persons.  This is most unethical, and many of them have used the element of surprise.  They surprised the mother to fear of bleeding and other fears, used to con hasty clamping.  It is not only midwives doing this, but many doctors use the same ploys, they have to test the baby, etc, etc.  Nonsense.

     FILING A WRIT FOR FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION TO YOUR BABY:  THIS IS EVEN FOR IN APPEARANCE,  ON THE SURFACE, OF HEALTHY LIVING BABIES .

    As of March 2004, an Ohio mother has filed her own Writ in her child's name for medical malpractice in her community. This is for her communities failure in not providing informed consent and true alternatives to active management. Like most mothers she had the run-around with lawyers who didn't know how to handle bogus hospital or medical or nurses policies that were imposing clinical studies as those all women, entering their premises for assistance in child birth had to be managed by drugs, called active management. The women, in most cases, were never informed of harmful birth positions of semi-sitting, and drugs crossing the placenta, threats of a virus (slow or fast acting entering the mother's blood stream, thus, the child's if any needle for IV or injections were inserted into her body, nor of the harm to her baby by any drug given, pill, liquid or gas. Nor the oxygen debt to her child's brain and cells by early umbilical cord clamping.  This mother, after she files for compensation to her child, now showing evidence of being compromised, is considering Laying of Information for the proceeding of criminal charges.  None of active management was done with true informed consent.  Now law firms are taking an interest when they see, mothers are upset, and they have been advised, "Get off the Pot or Do Something!"  They were left alone and their spouses to manage an impaired child.  The community of every hospital have left them down, with forcing them to sign for any care at all, "appropriate care."  The hospital, the nurses, the doctors then proceeded, in an institutional birth, to take their entire freedom of choice away, like they were a prisoner in that institution without rights to reject and oppose any touching of their person at all. Pregnancy is not a sickness, and our grandmothers birthed unassisted without a professional person available, and they did just fine, and better, if their bodies were not cut, or needles inserted, or their baby's umbilical cord's tied off, when still pulsating.  In fact, they put the placenta, untied and uncut, in a diaper and it fell off in due time, in a day or two. They put it in a out-house and put lime on it, and that was that.  Or, some did a ceremony and buried it under a new shrub. Pioneers did not have disgust to look at the placenta or be inconvenienced to have a genuinely blue ribbon baby.  It was the doctors selling the placenta and using the blood that made cosmetic removal a routine, and alleged a medical need, which was a lie, as the same of the political circumcision for little boys, (some girls), when they were selling the foreskin to skin tissue banks.  They were using the placenta blood secretly, and that was a breach of trust, so well kept by the labs, the nurses, the doctors, and the administration at each community hospital.

SICKNESS INDICATORS OF EARLY CLAMPED BABIES, ACTIVELY MANAGED BABIES ARE GENERALLY YELLOW-GREEN WITH YELLOW GREEN EYES, SHORTLY AFTER BIRTH:

    Many of these babies were caused to be jaundiced.  They would be caused iron overload.  This is a condition of having excess iron cells in their blood. This iron overload is caused by the death of cells by drugs, lack of oxygen, and low blood volume caused by hasty clamping.  

    These actively managed babies surviving that jaundice and later anemia had been violated by the birth person(s), taking advantage and likely participating in the harvesting of the baby's healthy stem cell blood.  The placenta blood, rich in suspensions of blood, white cells, red cells, stem cells, platelets, hormones, enzymes, amino acids, proteins were all taken in secret by one of the persons.  This was as the mother and father are concerned about their child.  The medical persons skirting away the placenta and secretly draining it, in many instances, or the labs.

    They were knowingly, without consent, harvesting the baby's placenta blood, and selling it.  These medical persons, sometimes the Administration staff of the hospital, and their labs, were seeking the value of the placenta and the blood in it.  They were knowingly involved in a conspiracy of secrecy of two or more, in this intent to take the blood and placenta, without informed consent.

        Medical Policies that are negligent of the visual science of medical care are no protection to those making them, or those approving them by following them, in any institution. They medical persons, all of them, had a duty to report and stand back from visually observable bogus policies that hid alternative political reasons of profits to be made in selling human organs, tissue, and blood.

    Those involved in the creating of such policies must be investigated for possible shares in medical corporations, stem cell blood, vaccination and drug manufacturers.  There must be a reason to bogus policies, followed blindly.  It is generally called a conflict of interest and secret to the legal guardians of the child, the parents.

    Those involved in active management had a financial and political reason.  Perhaps, they were likely splitting income paid for blood collection for samples, and as to the quality of blood obtained from healthy babies from known healthy parents, and their lineage and /or that particular blood type.     Don't be conned.  If you are, sue, for breach of fiduciary trust. Perhaps, the nurse got a bonus if she talked a woman to have a drug during labor, saying, "Dear, I am so fearful this may happen....running to the bank, afterwards with a commission of a actively managed birth, that now went from $500.00 to $20,000 dollars and not even a c-section.  We would have to be naive to think the nurse, as an agent of the hospital and the doctor didn't get some bonus for the encouragement of the use of the drug being offered and the consequences then to the woman and child, for even more care and treatment, if they were to live, at all.  That is my theory of nurses encouraging unnatural care.  To quote the threat to the mother and child.  "Demerol reduced the infant's ability to quiet himself once aroused. This was still observed at three and six weeks (Belsey, 1981). The long-term is believed to be in years, not actually in weeks.  Demerol delays maternal gastric emptying and increases the risk of aspiration and thus the danger of general anaesthetic (Olofsson 1997). Demerol was found to have low satisfaction for pain in labor and especially pain during delivery, and was associated with poor physical and mental health in the mother after delivery and had a fairly low rating for enjoyment of labor and control.  Forty studies of neurobehavioural changes in human infants that were observed after administration of anaesthetic and pre-anaesthetic agents to their mothers during labor an delivery . . ."None has shown that drugs enhanced or improve behavioural functioning in infants."  (Yvonne Brackbrill's submission to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 1979.  

    Brackbrill's submission stated "the introduction of toxic substances during the time a baby is being born, even for a single acute administration, can either kill cells or cause aberrations in them.  When cells proliferate in the cerebellum, that's not the end of it--they have to migrate into their final position and link up with other cells.  Both the rate of cell death and the patterns of migration of cells in the cerebellum have been shown to be very sensitive to the introduction of toxic substances." (ibid).  

    The above statements have been taken from Beverley A. Lawrence Beech, Honourary Chair of the Association for Improvement in the Maternity Services (AIMS), is a freelance writer and lecturer and lives in the United Kingdom.  Her full article can be found at this link, if yet active:

     http://midwiferytoday.com/articles/drugsinlabor.htm

FILING A WRIT IS JUST THE START OF SECURITY FUTURE DAMAGES TO THE CHILD AND FOR VIOLATION OF TRUST :

     It needs not great effort or statements.  It is basic and costs about $200.00 dollars to state a claim. What might the Writ state. Simply state the Umbilical Cord was clamped while the child's lips and tongue were still blue and the cord was red, firm and pulsating.  

    That this unnecessary procedure had not facts of need that was a benefit tot he child.  That it was done without informed consent to the volume of blood yet in the placenta that the baby had a legal right as a newborn citizen to have security of person of every drop of blood not stopped by a clamp.  

    The endangering is to oxygen debt to the brain, heart, lungs, and any organ by oxygenated blood deprivation, volume of blood and pressure; weakening any one cell. One cell can guide and direct 10,000 other cells. The duty was not for any medical person to do unnecessary interventions, not provable a benefit to the child or the mother.

    Fears of an condition happening is not empirical science to endanger mother or child. Did the condition happen.  If not, why do something endangering for no good apparent reason.  What there safer options?  If so, why were they first not attempted?

    The endangering to the mother of hasty clamping was the fact of blood volume and pressure of the blood going backward a threat to the mother of two types of blood mixing was a reality of a danger to the mother; and blood volume deprivation and a violation to the child.

    File a Writ for unnecessary threat to the child, for latent injury to even one cell.  The child can release the obligation of settlement when they are of legal age to do so.  Again, the parents spend the $208.00 for the Writ to be taken in the child's name, as soon as they have found out the deception of any medical person that excused hasty clamping on the child' lifeline.

     The clamping of the cord has motive for blood and another is merely done cosmetically, not a valid reason, not a medical need.  And in hospitals or birth centers, they may do this trend to harvest the placenta by selling it to drug companies, cosmetic companies, and early clamping means they harvest the baby's stem cells, that the doctors sell, too, and midwives.

    These medical persons are being likely rewarded for this known interference of the baby's placenta blood by every so much taken, every 20 ccs collected, by codes of samples taken, may fetch $150.00 or more, and 4 ounces may be a  major payment of $25,000.00. Why have your baby harvested and endangered to be less then nature intended the baby to be a blue ribbon baby with all brain cells not have any risk of an oxygen debt, or the nervous system.  Your baby has a right to his/her fair share of genius potential, and early clamping reduces the child to average or less then average abilities, that is an IQ of about 93. Best is 143 IQ, they learn easier and with less distress to remember and achieve.

ADVANTAGES TO WARM WATER BIRTHS -- NO SHOCK ON THE CHILD OF COLD AIR THAT ALSO STOPS THE PULSATING CORD:

    Warm water births allow for no cold air on the cord to stop the transfusion of oxygenated blood to the baby's lungs.  Warm water births that allow the mothers to catch their own babies, and not a stranger's hands on the child or risking a clamping tool endangering your baby to go into shock.  

    Again, protect your babies with an Signed Contract of what the medical persons cannot do.  If they do not sign the birth contract, a waiver, birth unassisted.  Just don't call them for hours after the birth of your baby.  After all, babies do come suddenly don't they?  All babies need to be care for logically and simply, nothing fancy.

     Birth in the warmest room possible,

    wrap the baby, when born, immediate in a warm towel, or remain in the tub; do not fuss with weighting or measuring, that can be done any time, no fire-drill to be done quickly.

    wrap the placenta in a warm towel, when born, and do not clamp or tie, or hand squeeze

    keep mother warm.  Let the mother eat, take beverages and move around as she pleases.

    There need be:

    no cutting of her body, no drugs........for healthy babies, and happy mothers, in most 93 to 95 percent of all births.  

    Other problems are created by mismanagement called "active management" where medical interventions are caused by meddling with nature, in most instances.  

    The meddling are most drugs, with questionable trace elements, ingredients and preservatives, that can allergies, even death to sensitivities to them or contaminants.

    These are drugs, morphines do slow down the labor, that is not painless birth. That is labor stopped.  Don't be deceived.

    That is deception they have stopped the birth process, in the same manner they attempted to use pillows, and crossing the mothers legs together, until the doctor arrived to catch his or her fees.

     That is the purpose of using drugs..it is more subtle then such past known delaying of the birth, and harmed most mothers and babies that was done to.  

    Drugs are used to restart the labor, and this is all unnatural.  The speeding the birth up is using harmful oxytocins, known too, and by the drug companies to harm the mother and the child.

    There are no safe dosage or skills to give drugs to a birthing lady.  There are always the risk to allergies...even death.  This risk of death to mother and child is for any risk of interventions including breaking of the waters...that risk obstruction of the cord, that can get compressed, so why risk any meddling of breaking of the waters, invasion of gels, and creams, stripping of the membranes.

MOTHER'S BODY BE IN CONTROL, SAY "NO" YOU CAN, IT IS YOUR LEGAL RIGHT TO DO SO: POLICIES CANNOT RULE OVER YOU BY A SELF-INTEREST GROUP CALLING THE SHOTS ON YOUR PERSON OR YOUR BABY.  PUT THEM IN THEIR PLACE, SAY NO.

     It is your body, your baby, do have them sign a Birth Contract they cannot do anything to the baby, outside of natural birth education and practice. State clearly what they cannot do.  List them on one page, and that only you, the mother can change the Contract, not a spouse, no one but you.

    There are generally no suits for natural birth and education.  There are suits all the time for Controlled Active Management, in the millions of dollars, every year, and class actions on the drugs.  Do you want money or good health?  These interventions are an unnatural obstruction to natural birth are generally associated with drugs.  

    These drugs can cause the baby to be mispositioned in the birth canal...that is the dangers of oxytocins...fast, hard, long labor contractions, neither the baby or the mother could control naturally.  

    These drugs took away the normal process of natural internal release of relaxin, prolactin, oxytocin, and serotonin. These are naturally given adequately by the mother's own system and babies, too, and natural pain killers released to curb discomfort of contractions.  Think of the child's birth exit as contraction discomfort rather than as labor pains.  Discomfort is to the mind and soul, more manageable then the thought of pain.  Yes, it is pain, but not unmanageable if you are educated that your body releases the necessary hormones and enzymes, if you trust your body and the child's to bring about a normal primal birth experience.  Drugs that that from you and they have not found to be a benefit to the mother or the baby, short term, or long term. Any pain run from in birth, will result in a lifetime of sorrow in raising an impaired and compromised child, shy of all the genius potential he o she might otherwise have used, to their fullest potential and means of development.

    Do Trust your own body and not the guesses of a medical society using artificially drugs and not taking responsibilities in most instances, as they say prove it...we "followed" policies. Their defense is they try to use the policies to excuse them hoping you think they not accountable for damaging your baby, if you signed an appropriate care form for treatment.  Again, it was not informed consent, the form for their protection is useless.

    Don't be fooled with their attitude that they want you to think "Tough Luck"  if you trusted them and did not question their policies. Or that science is best over primal birth rights of natural birth, even if a rented room, even in an institution.  Primal rights are that, a tradition that cannot be taken away by policies of medical societies trying to enforce a clinical standard of care on all women, that enter their "dens."

    Ladies if you are planning a family or already pregnant, Do  Be alert.  Be in Control.  It is wise to learn birth delivery (an emergency birth should not change just because a woman reaches the hospital in time).  Think about what is logical and practical before you even conceive and your partner must be equally educated and be supportive to primal and natural birth education and practice.  

_____________________

(2)  Notes:  comments on gentle births:

    Mothers never forget a bad birth experience. But a normal birth, taking the labor by moving around, no drugs, ideally, laboring at home, eating as necessary for energy, and not going to the hospital or birth center too soon (ideally birth at home at their own convenience) they do not remember, the birth contractions of inconvenience, at all.

    I have found that many mothers were given Valium during labor.  This drug is a form of the date-rape drug. It is used to erase the memory of the birth. I guess I was not given Valium for I well remember the good of my second birth, no drugs, and I labored at home, and my first birth, actively managed by Demerol and followed by immediate umbilical cord clamping.  I could have died following off a high table, I was expected to crawl unto in a drugged state (Morphine).

    The mothers went into the hospital, and most of them, being lucky, came out with a living baby but, if given Valium, were not remembering anything at all of their birth experiences. One mother, birthing sixteen times, said she did not know when any of her babies umbilical cords were clamping and cut.  This was true of my mother's birth experience, in the Second World War, 1939 - 1945.  She did not know what the doctor did in the clamping of any of her four babies; as was true of a lady giving birth to 16 babies.

    As to day, not once was the issue of cord clamping ever questioned or discussed the doctors decided at the time the child was born, by the sex of the child, the color, race, size, and likely the social status of the family.  They got to decide the fate of the child, to be a genius, or a worker of society.  The IQ is in the oxygen debt to the brain by the deprivation of oxygenated blood and nutrients of the placenta blood.  Do not let that power be in the hands of a stranger that you do not know their heart or conscience, in the truest sense.

    As evidence of birth violence taught to be acceptable see list of references and the biology textbooks, one in particular, 1980's, MacMillian, to quote:

     Biology, MacMillan,  Joan G. Creager, et al, 1985, p 708, This book was used at the local High School, in Dawson Creek, BC.  It may yet be still available as a reference source.  The book, which I have a copy in my possession,  misdirects the student that breathing of the human baby is caused by immediate cord clamping on a pulsating cord, severing the umbilical cord.  

    The author is directing a "sharp slap" on the backside is necessary to make the baby take its first breath.  While there was reference to medical diagrams of the women placed flat on their back, the most harmful of birth positions plus semi-sitting positions for women, the quotation below, seemed to be the opinion and medical directives of the authors of this book.  The book was used in some British Columbia schools.

    I am an advocate of gentle birth, being a victim of Active Management, high operating tables, feet tied down in stir-ups, two episiotomies, and in one birth, the child drugged and followed by immediate cord clamping, and left sitting up in a upright position, and hardening of the breast as the milk came in, most painful.  The baby circumcised as stated a medical necessity. Now we know the doctors have been banking the foreskin tissues in tissues banks, like the same with placentas being ground up and used in cosmetics, everything practical as to recycling of human parts, but without informed consent.

    See reference to other biology textbooks from 2003 and back and medical nurses manuals and the Merck Manual, at   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm .

____________________

    Note 3:  Unassisted Births.  I hardly recommend all mothers birth unassisted in their own home tubs...and catch their own babies, and here is why, the licensed midwives of today cannot be trusted to be deceptive and conceal their intent to impose a "fear" in their minds to harvest a baby's placenta blood by not substantiated need to endanger the baby to be deprived one drop of blood by hasty clamping.

     This is true to my experience of a family member with three midwives (one a student) in Markham area of Ontario services, using a fear of bleeding of the mother.   They did not record on the child's own medical chart, the child's cord was firm, red and pulsating when they clamped the cord and failed to photograph the placenta, how full it was, and to drain on camera, the amount of blood they deprived this baby.  This was during of a birth in May 2003, in Florida, a female medical doctor used the same bogus excuse to clamp the pulsating cord. The whereabouts of the placenta or the amount of blood drained from it, too, was kept secret from the community's knowledge what they do to the tissues, and organ and blood.  This is a violation to those with a religious conviction, to destroy by burning, confirmed, of those with a Christian belief, it is a sin to donate blood for human use and the tissues, as it is a sin to receive the blood.

    The blood deprivation, while babies do live, I repeat, is causing the baby to have iron overload.  This is the death of many red cells.  They release their iron and proteins but there is so much, the liver and spleen of tiny babies cannot deal with them, they overflow into the blood stream.  They can be toxic to cells.  The baby has now insufficient volume of red cells because of the early clamping.  This is logical to any qualified and trained doctor, who ought to know this through standard biology courses and training to deliver babies, or one would think so, eh?

    What happened to the baby was a fake fear the mother was in danger, to then endanger the baby to this iron overload and deficiency of nutrients of blood, harvested for another and for a petty fee paid to the midwives for that deception collection of placenta blood and/or the placenta organ, filled with the deprived blood.

      How did early clamping become a clinical standard of training and who started it?  It is normal for a mother to bleed during birth and afterwards, even up to 4 cups of blood being usual.  The placenta being full of placenta blood risked heavier bleeding by having to be birthed in fullness when naturally it would be birthed empty, a small cake, which means placenta, flat cake.  Instead it was like a full placenta blood bag.

    Many of these nutrients or proteins may never be adequate once deprived in the original baby's placenta blood, that were released by distressed cells.  For example, I'm told once interferon comes out of the cell, it is not replaced by that cell, once depleted.  Therefore,, Interferon, is the Big Daddy, that fights all bacteria and virus may never come out again or be created in the cells, once released of a distressed child, put into the fear of dying by deprived oxygenated debt to any one cell, including brain and nerve cells.

    Other Links at www.lotusbirth.com that may be of interest are:

References of 4-year research, over 56 pages:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

Diagram of proper education for all medical persons:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm

An example of a false study limiting clamping to a mere 30-clamping on

premature babies, still then requiring revival, but deprived of 20 to 60

percent total blood volume, influencing other Nations, to do the same, with

this clinical study, that was absent of the mother's being told, no clamping

or cutting of the cord, is the right of the premature baby, or any baby,

however, or wherever born.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-449.htm

One in Sixteen Babies being revived after early cord clamping:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-193.htm

Babies blood let every 2nd and 3rd day , some will die, and not be

investigated for murder, by lower their stem cells that the baby goes into

shock and dies.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-192.htm

Babies early clamped to have their blood sacrificed to another: (see a photo

of a very large placenta, full of the a deprived baby's blood, a disgrace

for the States & Canada and other Nations involved in harvesting the living

babies.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-357.htm

Doris Haire Links, ignored, apparently of best practice possible, least risk

of harm.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-498.htm

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-499.htm

Disease to babies by cut cords , and not cord need be clamped or cut, unless

the cord tore or for placenta previa.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-476.htm

Reduction of babies by 70 percent being revived by delayed clamping of the

cord, which should be natural delivery of the placenta before a clamp is on

the cord, full delayed OR, lotusbirth, no clamping at all:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-413.htm

Policies of drugs on the fetus/neonate:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-455.htm

Iron Overload caused by low blood volume and high death of red cells, common

to early clamped babies.  Iron excess is not more blood, but likely less blood.  My theory and conclusions from research.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-500.htm

Human Neonatal Foreskin Tissue Banks, real reason of circumcision, no doubt,

useful skin tissues, added income to tax revenue and to doctors services and

fees:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-463.htm

World Health Organization directs immediate cord clamping with use of

dangerous drug, Oxytocin:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-203.htm

ACOG cancels knowingly harmful and unreasonable hasty clamping policy #216,

November 1995 - January 2002

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-260.htm

200,000 drugged children in Canada, if we check, they will be drugged and

early clamped babies, early vaccinated in an anemic condition:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-252.htm

No good excuse for willful blindness of facts of visual evidence the placenta:

Each generation of doctors knew truth from as far back as 1801 , not to clamp

or tie off or hand-squeeze a pulsating umbilical cord:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-202.htm

Clamped Cords give concern of internal blood infections, even in the

cleanest of hospitals, and over 400,000 to 500,000 babies die of a cut cord,

and that would not happen in naturally no clamping or cutting of the cord,

ever, not cosmetically removed but falls of naturally, as traditional

pioneer birth of child care.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-168.htm

and prolonged healings of cut cords:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-206.htm

Oxytocins known harmful, not only to the World Health Organization, W.H.O.but to drug companies that make the

drug, used commonly for all birthing mothers, without disclosure made by

medical persons, or the hospitals allowing the drug used on their premises

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-190.htm

and by Martindale Pharmacopoeia, and like the USA and Canadian Food and Drug

Authorities, but did not go public, at large:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-186.htm

Chlorobutanol, known harmful to interrupt contractions of the heart, but

mothers not so warned, this drug may go by other names, per manufacturer.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-162.htm

Elimination by duty of ratification to United Nations:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-143.htm

Umbilical cords recorded since 1957, to pulsate up to 20 minutes, documented

in natural birth as well as in hospital births, that do not clamp the cord,

early.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-123.htm

Poster:  Don't Clamp the Cord

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-98.htm

HOLES in the heart are caused by early cord clamping, the foramen ovale does not shut (is alleged to have a flap on it to close with proper volume and pressure), and the ductus arteriosus does not seal:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-119.htm

ARE the medical services safe to be used and trusted:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-125.htm

Missing Blood to Chow-case-law, a $8 million suit  to an early clamped child,

not revived with whole blood to stop internal oxygen debt to brain and

nervous system, quickly.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-174.htm

UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, DEC, 1948, and still to be upheld

and respected to all persons, regardless of age, sex, color, or race, or

mental or physical disadvantages, or marital status (rich vs poor members of

society).

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-144.htm

False use of Drugs, Oxytocin, said to stop bleeding