Babies is their best survival based on gestation period or having full delayed umbilical cord clamping, if done at all? by Donna
Young
" Objective: The objective of this study was to examine survival, morbidity, and resource use in a large cohort of extremely preterm infants." Study below.
Comments of researcher: Many medical research on infant's survival and morbidity seem to be withholding information on the timing of the clamping of the infant's umbilical cord. If baby's got their full blood supply they created for their needs, the hormones, enzymes, and amino acids and oxygenated blood into their expanding lungs, more would likely survive. And, most would likely to survive with minimal internal problems if they were not clamped from their pulsating umbilical cord, nor would they have lung damages, if the placenta blood was allowed to naturally transfuse into the baby's expanding lungs. A test of these facts of healthy babies, all with no lung problems was done back in 1981, by Dr. T. Peltonen, for c-section babies. Only the babies early clamped had lung problems.
Nature designed the babies to be a Biological Reciprocal Sealed-Unit. It
seems the medical persons are being inadequately
trained on the fetus to neonate circulation system. This may accommodate harvesting of babies
for placenta blood for research.
This is highly unethical and bad science and bad medicine. The public is none-the-wiser of this
deception going on . The motive
for misrepresentation in biology textbooks, failure to advise in prenatal classes, failure to correctly
instruct, may be to keep the
medical persons negligent and the babies thus harvested for valued placenta blood trapped in the early
clamped placenta.
Revival of babies, which involve the executives of heart, lung, and stroke foundations,
are apparently also involved in directing
questionable revival techniques on babies. They are directing and commanding the baby be removed
from his/her lifeline, the
hopeline for quality of life, while the doctor waits for others to revive the baby, he / she has just
delivered. This means the doctors
are not competently trained to deliver babies and revive them, where is how is, calling for outside
help, and delay of oxygenated
blood to the baby's brain. The brain cannot take a oxygen debt, as to other cells, nor the nervous
system. These cells are there
for the life of the child, designed to last 100 years, and not so the other cells, that replace, within
120 days, such as the red mature
blood cell.
The baby, once having a oxygen debt to the brain and nervous system, while revived,
many not show damage that is latent in
demonstration until the baby is much older. The doctors and hospitals not taking accountability
for the hasty clamping, and drugs
involved during the child's care and treatment on their premises.
The baby compromised by prematurity to early clamping and being revived by being
raced down the hall to intensive care
services, the hospital not providing immediate revival equipment in the birth delivery room. I
would think that adequate training of
all medical persons involved in a child's birth would be to teach common sense and to revive the baby
where is, how is. This
logically is on the placenta cord to allow for the 20 to 50 percent of placenta blood natural transfusion
into the baby's expanding
lungs.
How this error in teaching of all medical persons, for frivolous reasons, of
detachment from an functioning organ, the pulsating
umbilical cord, must be investigated in a court of law, civil, criminal, or by an Official Inquiry,
if babies are being harvested and
regarded as little worth, but valued only for blood and internal organs used in stem cell cultivation,
transplants, and experiments.
This involves the cooperation of the Federal and Provincial Governments allowance of using tax payers
dollars in stem cell
research, without assurance of equal protection of all human beings, the newborn citizen.
You decide what is missing in the report below, in Abstract form, the full article
requiring payment, even though the research
was tax supported with taxpayer's dollars, the full report is not free. Why not? This concern
is by Donna Young, Mother and
Grandmother.
July 2001 • Volume 185 • Number 1
General Obstetrics and Gynecology: Fetus-Placenta-Newborn
Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks’ gestational age or less
Kevin Chan, MDa [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
Arne Ohlsson, MD, FRCPC, MScb [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
Anne Synnes, MDCM, FRCPC, MScac [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
David S.C. Lee, MBBS, FRCPCd [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
Li-Yin Chien, MPH, ScDa, e [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, FRCPC, PhDa, e [MEDLINE LOOKUP]
The Canadian Neonatal Network
Vancouver, British Columbia, Montreal, Quebec, and London and Toronto, Ontario, Canada • Previous article in Issue
• Next article in Issue
• View full-text version
• View print version (PDF)
• Drug links from Mosby's DrugConsult
• Genetic information from OMIM
• Citation of this Article
• View on PubMed
• Download in citation manager format
• Download in Medlars format
• Related articles in PubMed
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine survival, morbidity, and resource use in a large cohort of extremely preterm infants. full text with a membership, is available at:
Study Design: We examined all (n = 754) neonatal intensive care unit admissions born at 25 weeks’ gestation
and inborn
deliveries (n = 949) between 22 and 25 weeks’ gestation at 17 Canadian neonatal intensive care units.
Results: The overall survival rate was 63%, with a range from 14% at 22 weeks’ gestation to 76% at 25 weeks’ gestation. There was a high incidence of chronic lung disease (33%-51%), grade 3 intraventricular hemorrhage (0%-16%), necrotizing enterocolitis (0%-14%), stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity (27%-55%), nosocomial infection (25%-39%), and multiple gestation (18%-46%). Extremely preterm infants comprise 4% of neonatal intensive care unit admissions but account for 22% of deaths, 20%-60% of major morbidities, 11% of patient days, and 10%-35% of major procedures. Outborn infants had a higher incidence of chronic lung disease, severe retinopathy of prematurity, and intraventricular hemorrhage.
Conclusion: Extremely preterm infants have a high incidence of mortality and morbidity and consume disproportionate amounts of neonatal intensive care unit resources. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:220-6.)
From the Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia,a the Department of Pediatrics,
University of Toronto,b
the Department of Pediatrics, McGill University,c the Department of Pediatrics, University of Western
Ontario,d and the Centre
for Community Health and Health Evaluation Research.e
Supported by grant 40503 and grant 00152 from the Medical Research Council of Canada. Additional funding was provided by the B.C.’s Children’s Hospital Foundation; Calgary Regional Health Authority; Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Child Health Program, Health Care Corporation of St John’s; The Neonatology Program, Hospital for Sick Children; Lawson Research Institute; Midland Walwyn Capital Inc; Division of Neonatology, McMaster Health Sciences Centre; Mount Sinai Hospital; North York General Hospital Foundation; Saint Joseph’s Health Centre; University of Western Ontario; Women’s College Hospital.
Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Society/Society for Pediatric Research,
San Francisco,
Calif, May 1-4, 1999.
Received for publication September 28, 2000.
Revised January 17, 2001.
Accepted February 22, 2001.
Reprint requests: Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, FRCPC, PhD, Coordinator, Canadian Neonatal Network, Canadian Neonatal
Network
Coordinating Centre, 4480 Oak St, Rm E-414, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 3V4.
Copyright © 2001 by Mosby, Inc.
0002-9378/2001 $35.00 + 0 6/1/115280
doi:10.1067/mob.2001.115280
Articles with References to this Article TOP
This article is referenced by these articles:
The potential for probiotics to prevent bacterial vaginosis and preterm labor
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
October 2003 • Volume 189 • Number 4
Gregor Reid, PhDa,b,c*, Alan Bocking, MDa,d ABSTRACT
FULL TEXT
The benefit of preterm birth at tertiary care centers is related to gestational age
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
March 2003 • Volume 188 • Number 3
Shoo K. Lee, MBBS, PhDab, Douglas D McMillan, MDc, Arne Ohlsson, MD, MScd, Jill Boulton, MDe, David SC Lee, MBBSe, Sherwin Ting, BScab, Robert Liston, MBBSf ABSTRACT
FULL TEXT
_______________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for: AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus
to Neonate Circulation;
30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration
; Canadian
Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com) Search at Google this web site for
the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact: Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother
Home: www.lotusbirth.com
References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
A medical web site to visit:
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
