The Oath of Hippocrates

The Oath of Hippocrates, in purple, below, was acclaimed the law of medicine and the doctor's choice to reveal or not to reveal and to do no harm. But things change with democratic Nations. The care of the public, at large, is supposed to be ameliorated, not made worse. There are Constitutions and Charters alleging equal protection and security of persons.  And those are implied to be enshrined in all criminal codes, the Statutory laws, (do no harm to another), as well as implied in all civil laws, and the unwritten laws, and by the Supremacy of God. Comments of Donna Young

Part of Section #45, on the Canadian Criminal code on harm caused to another by a medical person is the protection from criminal prosecution is only "if" the treatment was necessary and proved a "benefit" to the recipient. The doctor can come under all other sections of the criminal code if that condition was not a proven factual need for that particular care and service.  The Evidence Act can be used for proper investigation for any allegations their care and/or policies being followed were endangering to the vulnerable and trusting patient, the mother, and/or the child, or both.

There are Criminal sections for all persons to abide by:  Bodily harm, Common Nuisance, and Homicide.  These sections do not exempt the medical persons from being called before the Judge.  The right of the parents, or any informed third party, can make the allegations to the proper authorities, including the police, and naming  the doctor and naming the nurses, too, or all those involved. This may include those directing false medical teaching, through making harmful policies allowed by the hospitals, rather than rejected, as not being best practice possible, and least risk of harm to mother and child.  Or, where the alleged offense took, place.

The nurses are either witnesses with the implied duty to have recorded the care and treatment they saw the doctor do, and ought to have known to report it to the proper authorities, not excluding the police being required to be informed. Or, they, too, are involved in concealment of such facts, making them a probable accessory before or after the fact.  This is for a child in intensive care units, and for any child that died after drugging and hasty umbilical cord clamping.  This is involving in the decision when a medical persons have concealed motives to endanger any person. Motives can be known distress to the child increases the release of red cells, and stem cells.  So all in the delivery room could be called before the Judge, too, and authorities on the production of blood, of such facts and how drugs can do that to the child and distressful births, caused that way by drugs, and constrained positions of birth and restrained freedom of movement of the mother.  

THE OATH OF HIPPOCRATES

    Comments:  It was comforting to know doctors were not hostile to higher powers, hoping their God was a loving God of Fairness and Justice.

    "To recon him who taught me this art equally clear to me as my parents, to share my substance with him and relieve his necessities if required; to regard his offspring as on the same footing with my own brothers, and to teach them this art if they should wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation, and that by precept, lecture and every other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the art to my own sons and to those of my teachers, and to disciples bound by a stipulation and oath, according to the law of medicine, but to none other. "  

(Comment: "...but to none other." The facts are there are only six (6) Indian/Native doctors in Canada. Seems being associated with a shaman (medicine man) does not qualify to get into medical college. Did this Oath keep such members of our society out of the profession of medicine? Or was it due to the clamping of the Indian/Natives' umbilical cord when they trusted, like all others, No deleterious harm done to them. But, if the practice of hasty clamping was imposed on them by hand-squeezing or applying a mechanical clamp, they were rendered victims to be delayed in learning. Thus prejudiced against for advancing to higher trades and professions?) Such an Oath would attempt to be used to bar woman from the practice, as well, would it not and did for a long period of time.

    "I will follow that method of treatment which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.

    " I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; furthermore, I will NOT give to a woman an instrument to produce abortion."

(  Comment:  The Active Management now used in all hospitals and prescribed by the hierarchy of those guiding maternity matters, have encouraged drugs be taken by women during Second and Third Stages of Labor. Of course, they have said it so she births with no pain.

The drugs generally used and not with their disclosed risk, are Morphines to delay labor, and to speed it up again, these are used: Oxytocin, Pitocin, Syntocinon which some believe are forms of abortion treatment.  Oxytocin is alleged used to stop bleeding. That is false.  It is not the hormone to seal broken blood vessels.  It actually increases the risk of bleeding by harsher muscle contractions.  

The hormones involved in sealing off the torn blood vessels are the platelets working with the hormone serotonin.  The natural oxytocin, as a hormone and it is regulated by the body, when to cause the baby's termination of its home in the womb.  The oxytocin causes uterus contractions, to propel the baby through the birth canal.  And after the child's birth, and all placenta blood has been transfused into the baby's body for the expanding lungs to now do the gas exchanges, to then bring the necessary muscle contractions in the breast for milk production, for the baby to be nursed.  

The internal hormones work to the facts of nature, not by the guess of man, often, being merely a business man, manipulating the child's birth for time convenience, and the hospitals time efficiency, too. The best practice possible for the benefit of the birthing mother was not the factor, as she believed and trusted in the system to do her or her baby no harm.  That is for a Court to decide, criminal and/or civil, or both, on this issue.

The oxytocins have questionable ingredients and trace elements, in them.  They ingredients were, in most instances, not disclosed by the hospital allowing the drug to be used without informed consent, by nurses and the doctors.  The woman's contractions are so violent, the infant is at risk of suffocation by the placenta pulling away from the mother's womb, prematurely. They then do not report a homicide birth, if the child was killed by inappropriate drugging the women during child birth.  This is not a death by natural causes, but by drugs and a medical care involving the nurses giving the drugs, or the one who administered it.  

All this was directed by the doctors, in most instances, gave instructions over the telephone, not there to see the situation at hand.  Doctors do this so a child's birth, unpredictable in time in length of labor, does not have his other business prospects put on hold.  Doctors at one time directed the nurses to stall birth by tying the woman's legs together or using a pillow.  Today, they can manipulate the child's birth, advance it or delay it by their knowledge of drugs.   

There are pills and powders to use to delay births, or advance it.  Advancing birth are Misoprostol or Cytotec.  The do the same work on the muscles, increase the contractions. These drugs may be even put in foods of the birthing mothers who are unaware a form of abortion pills have been given them to induce contractions. This was reported true of the doctors training in the Province of Ontario, that they were involved in drugging women without their informed consent. (See Are Medical Services Safe).

This in particular when the woman's position of birth is controlled by "Active Management" the use of drugs rather then the woman and her spouse being taught natural positions to control labor, or the value of warm waterbirths. Thus, unknown to the woman, told she can have a quick and painless birth, drugged her with morphines to confuse the brain of just how violent the contractions really were.  Nature, allows for the mother to use her own hormones to control the birth and length and degree of labor discomfort.  The contractions is the announcement to the mother baby is soon to be born by advancing through the birth channel, the more the increasing pain, means, in most instances, the labor is progressing, for the baby soon to be born.  And, why stop and/or set back the labor with morphines?  

There are known natural methods of relaxation of labor contraction discomfort. All the woman needs is education.  But many women are not encouraged in most hospitals, what these are, such as:  waterbirths, showers, warm baths, and gravity birth positions of standing, forward sitting, squatting, birthing on her side.  Any position is the birthing mother's legal right to have and to know about the most harmful positions are known to be flat on her back or in a semi-sitting position. These two latter positions are known to close down the opening of the pelvic bones, the birth canal, by 30 % reduction of the opening, a fact of science, known since 1913.    See the Poster this web site, "Don't Clamp the Cord, for the pelvic bone structure.  The closing down the birth canal, by up to 30 percent, then leads the medical person to either slice the woman's womb, or send her to c-section, if the baby is to live at all.

    "Into whatever houses I will go into them for the benefit of the sick and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and further from the seduction of females or males, bond or free."

(Comment: There was honour and trust the doctor was strong in ethics and morals. It also allowed the family doctor to know about natural alternatives to operations, such as herbs and nutritional care and only to use those skilled in amputations and operations for such needs).

    "Whatever, in connection with my professional practice, or not in connection with it, I may see or hear in the lives of men which ought not to be spoken abroad I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret."

(Comment: Secret from others NOT entitled to the person's private medical files???. However, the doctors are allowing privacy of the genetic codes to have been sold by selling the placenta and the placenta blood with that information being made known to others, or could be the risk of it.  

    The doctors also attempted, and the hospitals, too, from keeping the medical records and billings a secret from those they did a medical services for, or how much was charged.  The facts are, not disclosed to the public, they cannot do that, unless a Court Order freezes the medical persons records, to be kept a secret, and for what logical reason.  In Canada, in 1992, doctors were required to allow all their reports and tests made known to the patient or the legal guardian of another.  Then, again in 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in favor of the individual's rights to have access to "all" medical files and reports, and at the hospitals record's department, too.  All that is necessary is a written request from those involved.

    "While I continue to keep this oath unviolated may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the art, respected by all men at all times but should I trespass and violate this oath, may the reverse be my lot."

(Comment: Doctors do carry liability insurance for errors and omissions such as not providing for all information and informed choice, and to stand criminal trial, for doing unnecessary cosmetic removal of a functioning organ, endangering the child.  It would not be fair that the medical persons, nurses, included as accessories, before and after the child's care, have the finer things of life, while they caused any person to have a lesser life and lost enjoyment of life.  And because of an unnecessary medical procedures by the deprivation of a natural birth, that could have been natural, if there was the allowance for using warm water births, and no hands on the mother or the child, and NOT interrupting the child's circulation system.  

It would be up to both civil and criminal courts to learn of hidden intention or motives and conflict of interest to sell placentas and the placenta blood trapped in them. And the general practices, involving hospital's participation to even waste the child's so deprived blood, and concealed how much was deprived the baby, and other facts of the condition of the cord and when clamped.   

Doctors do know better.  They also have the means to determine the child's blood cells, even before birth.  They can know by state of the art technology, today, what is posted and wanted of stem cells sought, and world wide.  They have the means to capitalize on that information and manipulate a child's birth to have those deprived baby's blood in another area of the world within 36 hours.  The child can be endangered by such knowledge even before the woman enters the hospital for believed no harm done care, to her or or baby, and not either to be exploited.  The babies are not to be harvested, that is implied duty. If the government knew this was going on by their representatives to the Colleges of Midwives and Physicians and Surgeons, the officials involved, must be, too, before the Judge.

Factors of discrimination as to whose babies will be harvested may be to the facts of the mother's health,  color, race, belief, and marital or social/economic status in the community.  With organization and cooperation of secrecy, who would report the doctors and other medical persons involved in this, and their policies?  So far, many doctors, nurses, and midwives, and others, have made excuses to clamp the functioning cord.  Many have made every effort to keep that secret, even to the birthing mother.  They have used sheets to block the view of the care to the child and when the child was clamped.  They have not used mirrors for observation of the care of the child's care.  And the mother were not given advance warning of the training and intentions of the doctor or what he might do on the pulsating cord, that they could say no and have an Court Order prevent harm by intentions of the doctor to do as he/she wished on any particular persons child.

WITHHELD NOTES ON THE CHILD'S MEDICAL CHARTS AS TO DRUGS LIKELY PRESENT IN THE CHILD'S PLACENTA CELLS AND INTERNAL BLOOD:

Knowingly the likely internal impairments done to the infant, as alleged, all records of treatment to the infant's lifeline have been, to this date, said to be "unimportant" to the doctor to record such matters. That is unimportant to himself/herself, the medical person, but, otherwise, important to the child, some day, to know all facts of their birth.

The child must have equal protection for compensation for unnecessary birth procedures that endangered their well being.  It was very important to give a possible reason of the child's distress, disorder, disease that may be latent and become apparent days, months, or years later as to the care given the mother, thus the child, particularly, of the clamping of the chid's lifeline.  This fact will determine the child's abilities and means to learn and behavior to some degree. It can reduce a child's potential genius to just being an average or below average child.

While most average to large babies tolerate this unnecessary threat to their well-being, there was an implied duty to have known or ought to have known the practice of hasty clamping was endangering to the child. This fact of research dates to 1801. Such research on both animals and humans discloses subtle internal injuries, and statements to that fact have been made every decade.  Doctors have known hasty clamping will surely do something to lessen the life-time of the child, or cause latent learning and behavior disorders as the child's life progresses.  It is becomes apparent early clamped babies are different then those children who did NOT have any interference with their life-line --the circulation system.

We all have the rights to be born equal, with equal protection and security of person.  Therefore, might there be concealed motives, to weaken a race some may feel, is not equal to their own?  Since ignorance of such medical matters, no harm done not to clamp the cord, are not a defense to the medical professional person, might we alleged a moral problem in our society, by some medical persons?  After all, they are supposed to be competently trained, and ethical and morally. It was their duty.  

Might we allege maleficence, the act or fact of doing evil or harm, even to one person.  Who the perpetrators are of this medical maleficence, has remained a secret, accept for the policies now made public.  The Societies of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are involved.  Policies #216, November 1995 (cancelled Jan 2002) of ACOG; Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89 May 2000 of SOGC, are still unchanged.

We need medical persons who all are ethically, morally, and competently trained to practice medicine and to make proper and factually sound educational bulletins and policies.  This proper care and best practice possible, least risk of harm, is for wherever, even in emergency births, for normal vaginal births, for c-sections, and for all babies, including premature babies.  This is so all babies, world wide, are equally loved and protected.  This is not an option or an opinion but our implied duty.  We cannot remain silent on this issue, any longer because of the harvesting of the babies, now unprotected and not defended by our elected officials.  They alleged they did not know how to control the doctors and nurses on this issue.  They had a duty to use the courts, to request an Official Inquiry, to investigate the increased sickness in our children and increased learning and behavior problems and the drugging of children to attend school.

The secret debates on this issue are now open, and made public, only because of Internet. All other checks and balances remained closed by the power of secrecy within the medical associations and societies on this issue. The Colleges responsible for protecting the public blocked all forms of communication on policies, endangering even one person, past or present, or future.

This medical care and treatment has had organization by many medical doctors, and the experts. Dare we call this issue a blood seeking issue, a conspiracy?  It had many levels of governments and hospitals and medical associations involved.    If true,  this has been a concealed conspiracy, because most victims have lived, but with internal damages, it is a criminal matter.  

Medical persons, by their own policies and working with the hospital administrations did work in harmony and in secret.  They did, so in most instances, in secret to the public, at large.  This they did as they worked with lab technicians, nurses, medics, doulas, photographers, and the blood banks, world wide on these issues:  drugging of the mother during birth; harmful birth positions; hasty umbilical cord clamping; taking the baby's blood trapped in the placenta and selling both the placenta and the blood in many instances.  This is done, in most instances, without informed consent.  The medical persons failed to make the accurate and proper birth records on the child's medical charges, or give the mother copies of all birth reports and tests.  This is being done by both the doctor and the nurse, or other medical persons.  Then following hasty clamping, they did allow the child's vaccinations, many on one day, while yet the child was anemic, or could have confirmed, this weakened condition, by testing, and to delay vaccinations, many with harmful ingredients in them, and known to have such by most governments.  

Then, those involved, including professional teachers, had society blame the compromised child for failing to meet our expectations on their learning abilities and on their behavior.  The experts organized to make statements it was the child's own fault for not trying hard enough to overcome obstacles certain medical persons caused the child by making life, for them, more difficult, when life is difficult, as it is.  

This page's url:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbith-446.htm

Comments or questions to: Donna Young   dyoung@pris.ca