Human Stem Cell Images & Reproduction
Human Stem Cells from whom do we collect the cells? Say no to collecting from babies. There are shared red links below for your better understanding of the importance of such cells being provided for your own baby's well being, and not another's. Today, many doctors and midwives are involved in hasty clamping, including females.
This trend for hasty umbilical cord clamping is done by deceit and without informed rights of the parents
to be able to stop the
medical person (s). The medical person (s) are pulling a last minute "crisis" that when
investigated is a smoke screen. They
intended to clamp the cord early, and used a poor excuse to get away with stem cell deprivation to "your"
baby. If you, the parent,
directed hasty clamping, check out if you had full information made to cause you to think you were doing
your baby a favor. But,
now, know, they lied and withheld information to you to manipulate a decision to get you to believe
hasty clamping was good for
the baby, you were deceived and did not give informed consent. The duty was on the medical person to
have told the full
information, all of it, and the risks to the mother and the child. That includes current and long-term
risk taking to the child's future
abilities and health.
FEAR OF MOTHER BLEEDING, CURRENT FEAR-TREND TO GET THE BABY'S PLACENTA BLOOD:
The most recent false excuses doctors and midwives, females, used to get the stem cells, was they said they feared the mother would bleed after child birth. Well, that is normal, and to even bleed up to 4 cups of blood, apparently. So how did this fear correct that normal possibility by depriving the baby of his her placenta blood? And, it still endangered the mother, too, by the possibility of two different blood types mixing, or the Rh factors being involved. This is a known concern when clamping a full placenta that it may leak or burst. And the known probability of the baby's blood in the cord being pushed "forward" too hard up into the vein and heart, too. And, then no blood volume and pressure, because the circulation system has been cut off and the baby from his stem cells, too. That is what happens by hasty clamping, and the baby was deprived of valuable blood nutrients.
This is being, by the author as an alleged criminal assault and battery. We need witness and those
with knowledge of such facts
to bring the issue before a Judge. We need that first test case if we are to stop the on-going
medical organization of
endangering mother and babies, during birth, and needlessly.
We must think, not of the embarrassment to the medical persons, who did not step back from false practices,
but of the baby.
We must look at the risk to the mother, too. Raped women had to have encouragement
to make that first complaint and to take
the assault and battery to the court. We need that first test case of assault and battery to mother
and child on the issue of hasty
umbilical cord clamping, too, to be before a Judge.
RETURN OF THE MIDWIFE:
We cannot allow midwives, and most of them are now registered-nurse-midwives, to make a come back if they are following unethical and immoral practices, and policies, on this issue to continue. As to this date, the midwife associations have not gone before or requested for a Commission Inquiry to deal with those involved in false policies on maternity matters and care and treatment to the child. This is because each organization is being controlled by an influential person, involved in stem cell research, or most likely. They are trying to make this opinion, rather then the logic of science, of the risk taking and the endangering to both the mother and the child. Hasty clamping is not best practice possible, and least risk of harm. Why is that? These midwives, even the medical medics, are persons who are intending to go into the homes, and in most cases, have not sufficient means to revive babies on life supports, or help the mothers endangered, too. This is after they risked hasty umbilical cord clamping for smoke-screen reasons, the motive, for want of a good reason, was likely...to get the baby's blood.
DOCTORS WORKING IN HOSPITALS, MALE AND FEMALE, CANNOT USE THE HOSPITAL TO DO ASSAULT AND
BATTERY, BY MEDICAL POLICIES, KNOWN TO BE FALSE FOR THE LAST 200 YEARS:
We cannot allow doctors in hospitals, male or female to endanger babies, just because they can revive
the baby. This is
because any revived baby is still a compromised and impaired child to the degree any one cell was damaged
by no oxygen or
blood flow to it. Please see
www.cordclamping.com
At this web site, there is good medical facts, written by Dr. George M.
Morley, not to clamp the cord until "All pulsation ceased. But, on the same site, there is
the science research evidence of only
providing babies with 30-second clamping. Why was that? Was the researcher, Judith S. Mercer,
having a gun held to her
head? She actually admitted to personally counting the 30-second clamping. Of course, she spared
the babies of immediate
cord clamping, but there was not much difference. And, what if the cord had been compressed in
the birth canal...the baby may
not, then, had much blood at all in their person.
Rape of the 20th Century!
In another declaration of articles, at birthlove, the mother, Leilah, author of Rape of the 20th Century, refers to the baby's placenta as the mother's. While I agree with all the other concerns shared, and how harmful they were to both the mother and the child, and done to millions of women, not making it right, but indication the lack of respect to mothers and children, this is false science and logic.
I do not know the motive, it may be merely poetic, but we need facts of science revealed to the public. This false information may
suggest the mother can assume ownership of the baby's blood. If the mother is making a declaration
the placenta and the blood
our hers, where is the protection to the baby's right of ownership of his/her own blood and by facts
of science the DNA proves the
blood the baby's, and the organ it was created in.
We do not know if Leilah is allowing, for her own babies, early clamping and depriving the baby of his
her legal right to be
protected, to full placenta transfusion. This is a perceived duty owed to the child. This
is the baby's own placenta blood and the
placenta is the baby's, so the duty is equal protection and security to the person. We have no
explanation why her article does
not support the facts of science, as to stating "My baby's placenta was perfect.
WHEN MIGHT A CORD BE CLAMPED FOR GOOD REASON AS A BENEFIT TO THE INFANT/NEONATE?
The only reasons for a medical person to stop the child's circulation system, are in an emergency situation where the cord tore or for placenta previa. These are the directives of Dr. George M. Morley. They are logical and visual. All other reasons are opinion, and where do the persons substantiate the opinions on care in facts of science and medicine as to that particular situation.
Correction to restore the child to oxygenated blood is immediate, if one of these two emergencies did
exist. All other reasons
must before a judge.
LOYALTY IS TO DO NO HARM TO MOTHER OR CHILD DURING CARE AND TREATMENT:
Do not let your trust in the doctor overrule your duty to the child, so endangered. Most children survive the assault and battery, but it is still that....assault and battery, and in some cases, homicide, where the child later died.
The facts are, the cord should have been left alone until all pulsation stopped. Ideally, no clamping
was done until the third stage
of labor was complete, the completion of the child's birth, the afterbirth, the placenta born.
Medical persons are business persons, and they have been, most likely been rushing nature along, and
using drugs to do that, in
many of the cases. Don't accept they did not know better as an excuse. Ignorance is not
an defense for professionally trained
persons. They had the best chance to know better and ought to have. And midwives and nurses
and medical medics, and
doulas, too.
If they think they have ignorance as an excuse, this web site has references of past history, that they
did know, and could have
known, and was a duty to know what is best practice possible, least risk of harm on the care to the
mother and the child, the fetus
and to the born child, now called, the neonate:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
CRIMINAL CHARGES CAN BE LAID BY THOSE WITH INFORMATION:
Please consider criminal charges against the medical person (s) involved in hasty cord clamping. Criminal charges will change the system, and they are for discipline. Common Nuisance, Section #180 carries with it a two year sentence, and bodily harm, assault and battery are more severe, as are charges of homicide.
Please consider, filing, also a civil Writ to protect your child's interest, as to possible delayed
internal injuries. The Writ allows for
settlement for latent internal disorders that may not be evident for many years, until the child is
of school age. Civil damages are
to financial compensation to the expense of raising now an impaired child, subtle to serious. See
Chow and Ing case-law,
Ontario, Canada.
Hasty clamping is associated with a child's later learning and behavioral problems. It predispositions
the child to such
disadvantages in life. Even to compound the risk of vaccinations, while the child is still anemic. Many
of these vaccinations were
given at birth, or days after birth.
This information is shared so future mothers and fathers can protect their babies, and the mothers themselves.
The parent(s) are
in need of having actually a signed Birth Contract the medical person cannot touch their baby's
umbilical cord. They cannot
hand-squeeze it, often done behind the sheets that mother's cannot see, nor the fathers, holding the
mother's hands. They cannot
clamp it. To do outside of the cord tore or for placenta previa, will be at their own peril, for
the seeking of criminal charges taken
and a civil Writ filed in the child's name.
THIRD PARTIES TO THE ACTIONS:
Involved in this false trend are those who had a duty to protect the children, too. These are the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and Colleges of Midwives, the Association of Registered Nurses, and the Ambulance Medics. They did not allow true access to the public to make complaints on endangering policies and allowed them to continue, the public, at large, none the wiser.
They are all self-governing but they all organized and were allowed to be self-governing as to duty
to protect the public. All are
involved in not reporting false medical directives, in policies, and the policies may have been smoke
screes to conceal real
motives of taking the baby's placenta blood. The leaders may be accessories before or after
the fact of a crime of unnecessary
and criminal medical malpractice.
The curriculum to the registered nurses was inadequate, not showing or demonstrating the fetus to the
neonate circulation
system, so the nurses could not report endangering to the child, when they saw one doctor doing full
delayed, a protection to the
child and the mother, and did not report hasty umbilical cord clamping, particularly, for those babies
needing then revival. One in
sixteen babies are not being revived in Canada. And the nurses are not saying anything? Why
not? And did not make an
independent factual report on the child's own medical chart, the cord was red, firm and pulsating when
clamped, and the part of
the baby's body born, when clamped, and the time at birth, when clamped. Why not?
The baby and mother will have life harder, why Conceal and Protect those who endangered? They
did not better.
Don't sacrifice your baby, in protecting professional persons that knew better, or ought to have. See a lawyer, if hasty umbilical cord clamping was done to your child. File a writ, as the first step, for civil damages. There is overwhelming evidence the medical person ought to have informed herself, himself, they were endangering the child. Let them explain their position and any facts of evidence how it was a benefit to the child or the mother, as to their fears or trends to endanger, or beliefs hasty clamping was a cure for anything. Let them tell it before a judge and the policy forcing that decision they personally made, and controlled the clamp.
DUTY TO ALLOW FULL INFORMED CONSENT, BY THE ABLE:
Blood stem cells should come from only those who are able to give informed consent. Babies are not finished growing, not 110 pounds, not known to be in good health when clamped, and not age 17. The newborn babies should not be imposed on by early umbilical cord clamping, to donate blood to any science cause, or to another person. Why has every politicians, Federal and Provincial stepped aside and not protected babies and are allowing this to happen in any Nation? They are allowing harvesting of babies, but would not allow that to happen to a none-person, under 14 days old, as a embryo. Where is the logic?
INJUSTICES NOT BEING OPPOSED BY THE LAW FIRMS OR THE POLICE?
What has happened to our justice officers, the lawyers and the police? Is this a fear of their own well being, like they are living in a non-democratic society, in Canada or the States? Is this a Nazi Germany enforcement kind of policy, where they picked on the weak? Is this Canada? Is this the States, that we embrace picking on the least able to defend themselves? Do they not care what is going on?
This practice is a harmful trend and it is weakening the babies and increasing the cost of medical care
services and education
cost. Many of the children will never lead completely normal lives or have longevity. Is that what we
intend? Babies sick at age 8
or less with cancers and brain tumors.
If the adults will not do anything, then the children of legal age today, but under 26 or 27 years of
age, have legal rights to go back
and get their birth medical records, for do their own investigation why they have suffered life harder
than it should be, in health,
learning and in behavioral problems. The lack of kept records is to the peril of the medical institution
and the medical persons
involved. We can see the policies of today, are directing immediate umbilical cord clamping, unless
there is evidence contrary to
that policy, the present is likely the key to the past, even without a harmful written policy. A
living child is not evidence of no harm
done because the injuries are logically internal, documented, back to 1801, to the present date. Doctors
had to have a motive
how they selected one child over another for hasty clamping, when the cord had not torn, nor was it
a situation of placenta previa.
HOSPITALS HAVE POLICIES OF BEST PRACTICE POSSIBLE LEAST RISK OF HARM? They have vicarious liabilities.
The hospitals must have been part of the stem cell collection by receiving the placenta in their labs,
or sending them out to others,
for a fee. Such facts are evident to billings of handling organs, tissues, and blood samples,
all paid either by the medical plans,
or private interests in the cells desired and organ that supplies components of blood and enzymes, and
proteins, and plasma.
This is a violation of an implied duty that the strong do not pick on the helpless. This trend
and practice of taking the baby's stem
cells, at birth, is not only unethical, it is likely criminal assault and battery, and a homicide where
the weakened baby dies, even if
in a hospital.
SILENCE OF THE NEWS MEDIA:
The public has not been informed by the major news medias, who generally had an implied duty to inform the public of harmful trends or threats to their children.
The links below, are awesome containing information and images on the human stem cells. Links are also
provided to some of
the information by the Merck company, involved in medicine and training manuals. Links
are provided on reproduction and the
birth care and treatment to the mother and the child.
I provide the link to Merck's involvement of teaching harmful "active management" to the medical
persons. This shared as to
evidence of inappropriate information, contrary to what is withheld, natural birth education.
If the price of science research and the good of it, is done at the expense of others loosing freedom
of informed consent and
being exploited or made into second class citizens, I have mentioned the ancient laws, as well. We
have current Charter of
Rights and Freedoms regarding Human Rights and we must use them in civil and criminal court. We have
criminal laws to deal
with touching another's body, in an invasive manner, and without informed consent of the legal guardian
of the child.
The human stem cell image links were found at
Google under Images, Human Stem Cells.
Here is the link of the images of stem cells , and their developments. http://images.google.ca/images?q=human+stem+cells&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en
A stem cell, is like the seed of a flower, it develops into a special cell. This
is because the cells genetic code is triggered by
enzymes, to mature in the way it should grow. All cells have a specific DNA genetic program to
be a specific cell, enzyme,
hormone.....so leave all to nature, no one has perfected that yet.
But man, by his means of being cunning, has made science and medicine to achieve personal increase in
wealth, but at the
expense of health to others. They have made a dollar and many medical science persons have and
their politicians, their
education biology helpers, the news media, the officials of the justice system, have concealed conflicts
of interest, or given
protection to professional person's status, and their own policies that attempt to take away individual
rights and choice, of
informed consent from truthful information.
We have deception in the science and the medical arts. This is when such state of the arts have
strayed from clean air,
unpolluted water, and soil.
We have put questionable chemicals in all that lives and they, in most instances, are not welcome into
our cells, and have
mutated them. We have also robbed our babies, animals and human babies, at birth, all their fullest
potential. We did this by
clamping off the lifeline, the hopeline. We clamped off the placenta blood, volume and pressure. That is very sad to have treated
both the birthing mother and the child with such disrespect and usury. The system in animal and
human birth, using tools and
chemicals is called "Active Management." It is the drug companies program, not nature's. Be wise. Please consider going back
to natural birth for animals and the human babies.
Links to human stem cells and researchers
:
http://images.google.ca/images?q=human+stem+cells&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N
http://images.google.ca/images?q=human+stem+cells&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=40&sa=N
http://images.google.ca/images?q=human+stem+cells&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=60&sa=N
http://images.google.ca/images?q=human+stem+cells&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=80&sa=N
Types of Cells: Procaryote (Prokaryote) -- without a visible nucleous and Eurkaryota (with
a visible nucleous):
There are two primary types of cells: prokaryote cells and eurkaryota cells. Prokaryotic cells have no true nucleus and divide by fission; while eukaryotic cells have a true nucleus. There are many distinctions between these two different types of cells as summarized by this table:
http://biology.about.com/library/weekly/aa031600a.htm
The main differences between plant and animal eukaryotic cells are that plant cells contain cell walls,
glyoxysomes and plastids
while animal cells do not. Animal cells contain centrioles and lysosomes which are not found in typical
plant cells.
http://biology.about.com/library/weekly/aa031600b.htm
Cell Division by mitosis for all somatic cells
of the human body and by meiosis for the development of the sex cells:
Development of sex cells
by Merck:
http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_interactive_tools_vap_index.jsp
"The formation of sex cells begins before birth; spermatozoa form in males and oocytes in females.
Spermatogenesis (sperm
cell production) occurs in the seminiferous tubules. Spermatogonia (stem cells) line these tubules at
birth and contain 46
chromosomes (genetic material). After birth, spermatogonia continue to divide during mitosis. This cell
division process
produces two daughter cells with the same chromosome number (46) as the parent.
At puberty onset, some spermatozoa grow to become primary spermatocytes. These cells undergo
meiosis, the cell
division process that cuts back the number of chromosomes from 46 to 23. Each primary spermatocyte
undergoes the
first meiotic division to produce two secondary spermatocytes. Each secondary spermatocyte undergoes
the second meiotic
division to produce two spermatids. Each spermatid develops into a mature spermatozoon (sperm cell).
In this way, meiosis
produces millions of sperm every day.
Oogenesis is the formation of the ovum (female sex cells), which begin as hundreds of thousands of oogonia
(stem cells) in the
fetal ovaries. During prenatal development, the oogonia grow to become primary oocytes that contain
46 chromosomes. Each
oocyte undergoes meiosis; at birth, oocytes are in prophase. During this first meiotic division, oocytes
enter a resting phase that
lasts until the oocyte resumes development during the ovarian cycle (puberty). The female is born with
all the oocytes she will ever
have.
__________________________________________________________
T and B Cell Decreases and Increases
A T-Cell is a type of lymphocyte that attacks foreign bodies directly, destroying them chemically, derived from the thymus gland and distinguished from a B cell by its relatively smooth surface: Since T cells do NOT secrete antibodies and B cell do, it seems plausible that T cells might cause B cells to produce antibodies (Science News) T(hymus-derived cell. Source, World Book Dictionary, Vol. L-Z, 1979.
A B-Cell is a type of lymphocyte that produces antibodies, characterized b many fingerlike protrusions on its surface: Both the B-cells and T-cells reside primarily in the body's lyhmphoid tissues.
. . . From these tissues, the cells recirculate through the body
and continually monitor for the presence of potential attackers (Time) B(ursa of Fabricius, an organ
in chickens where the cell
was first found).
T and B cells by Merck:
The Merck Manual of Medical Information--Home Edition
Section 14. Blood Disorders
How Blood Cells Develop
How Merck's current manual encourages the infant to be deprived of essential blood volume and pressure
at birth,
by early umbilical cord clamping:
"Immediately after a baby is born, the doctor or nurse gently clears mucus and other material from its mouth, nose, and throat with a suction bulb. The baby then takes its first breath. Two clamps are placed on the baby's umbilical cord, side by side, and the umbilical cord is then cut between the clamps. The baby is dried and laid carefully on a sterile warm blanket or on the mother's abdomen.
The baby is weighed and measured. The doctor examines the baby for any obvious abnormalities; a full physical examination comes later. The baby's overall condition is recorded at 1 minute and at 5 minutes after birth using the Apgar score. The Apgar score is based on the baby's color (pink or blue), heart rate, breathing, responsiveness, and muscle tone (limp or active).
Keeping the newborn warm is critical. As soon as possible, the baby is wrapped in lightweight clothing (swaddled), and the head is covered to reduce the loss of body heat. A few drops of silver nitrate solution or an antibiotic is placed into the eyes to prevent infection from any harmful organisms that the baby may have had contact with during delivery."
The mother, father, and baby usually recover together in the birthing room. Once transported to the nursery, the baby is placed on its side in a small crib and kept warm. Placing the baby on its side prevents fluid or mucus from blocking the airway and impeding breathing. Because all babies are born with low levels of vitamin K, a doctor or nurse administers an injection of vitamin K to prevent bleeding (hemorrhagic disease of the newborn). An antiseptic solution is usually applied to the newly cut umbilical cord to help prevent infection.
About 6 hours or more after birth, the baby is bathed. The nurse tries not to wash off the whitish greasy material (vernix caseosa) that covers most of the newborn's skin, because this material helps protect against
Merck apparently is supporting what is in the best interest for a drug company. This is supporting
"Active Management" They
have not allowed to be shared what is Natural Birth Education or practice or the choice made known to
all mother-to-be. This is a
bias. Natural birth education means the mother is informed of her legal rights to have a
warm water birth, no drugs, and a proper
gravity birth position, or to birth on her side, not controlled in harmful birth positions, flat on
her baby or placed in semi-sitting birth
positions. There seems to be no alert that all drugs, offered in labor or during birth,
cross the placenta. These drugs can interfere
with the child means to absorb or assimilate nutrition. These drugs may cause allergic reactions
to both the mother and the child,
even if skillfully given.
Right to full and factual information: The mother has a legal right or the father to catch her
own baby, in a warm water birth; to
bring the baby's face out of the water, and remain in the water with the baby, until the placenta is
expelled. No clamping or cutting
of the umbilical cord needs to be done, ever. This is clamping and cutting the cord must be told
they need not be done, as they
are only cosmetic removal, and the hospitals may be involved, or the medical person (s) in selling the
placenta. Only if the cord
tore or for placenta previa must a cord be clamped. Those conditions must be investigated if caused
by recklessness, and what
was done to immediately help the child back to oxygenated blood, for no internal injuries by deprived
blood, volume, pressure
and nutrients.
Why taking the placenta and the placenta blood is a violation of privacy. The genetic codes found
in blood and organs and
tissues can be then in the hands of persons not authorized to have them, for genetic experimentation. If the cord is clamped early
like implied by Merck, the placenta will retain 20 to 50 percent total blood volume. Injury is
to the mother if this full placenta in her
body, leaks, mixing her blood with the child's. Further, the child is weakened by loss of blood
components, nutrients of all kinds,
essential to the child's well being, including Vitamin K and other blood clotting factors that are in
the blood, and hormones and
enzymes essential to the child, too.
By the drug companies controlling the training of the medical persons, informed choices and proper education
of the mothers are
not possible, for informed choice. Proper birth positions are not shared, and flat on the back
positions distress the mother and
child, by closing the birth canal up to 30 percent. This then may bring on the tools, cutting
the mother's body, called an
episiotomy, or the use of forceps, or both, or a vacuum. Each intervention risks the well being
of both the mother and the child.
Internal injuries are to the child, which may not show up for weeks, months or years. Nor, the
learning and behavior problems.
Mothers have a legal right to have a signed birth contract for natural birth, and that may mean the
doctor must not come near the
mother, nor nurses. A waiver is signed for an unassisted warm water birth, whether at a home birth
or a hospital birth. Doctors
are great if needed, but they should not be allowed to interfere with the design of nature and be used
as agents for blood
collection by hasty clamping off the cord. They have a duty to report endangering birth practices
and stop doing them themselves.
The Lotus Birth, no clamping or cutting off the placenta, assures the mother and the child of best practice
possible. The cord will
detach itself from the placenta in a day's time. The placenta and cord are simply put in a diaper
or aired as the baby sleeps.
This is the method used, wisely, by many of our grandparents, prior to 1923, when most births were healthier,
when in the home.
As long as the mother was not interfered with by cutting of her body, or the child's cord not cut, no
infections were caused, and the
babies were more to be blue ribbon babies, then not.
Concerns, of Donna Young
Merck also has a conflict of interest in given a newborn baby vaccinations, and all this while the baby
is likely anemic, low blood
volume and pressure. Any jaudice is likely associated with drugs given during birth, like oxytocins,
and the fact of dead red cells,
by lack of oxygenated blood. Iron stays in the body to be reused. Now because of so many
cells dying, the baby has
insufficiency of red blood by hasty umbilical cord clamping.
Tests....Mothers can get all copies of blood tests done on their babies and the Apgar scores, all of
them, if two or more were
done, and the copy of the information sent to the birth registration records office. These blood tests
suggest more tests and
samples of blood were taken from the baby, in addition to the placenta blood blocked in the placenta
by the clamp. More blood
samples weaken the baby. And Tests taken from any needle inserted into the infants body, risks
a virus infection that may be
lurking and slow in developing.
Here is some more quotations of Merck who have not informed the mother of the baby's own natural immunity
system. They
appear to be setting standard medical procedure, that may be stated as required by the nurses or the
doctors providing health
care services. Each one offered of course, puts the risk to the baby higher, as well as the increased
medical costs. In many
instances, the mother did not give informed consent to many of the testing and procedure done to her. She was not explicitly told
by the nurse or the administration staff of the hospital of her legal rights to say not to procedures
or what they were and her
options. The informed mother must be told she can say "No" what is stated below by Merck,
in any hospital birth, or home birth,
where a medical person, trained by their influence, is attending the birth:
"Before the newborn leaves the hospital, blood specimens are taken for a number of laboratory
tests. For example, one
test measures the levels of thyroid hormone in the blood, which is important because low levels can
result in cretinism, a chronic
thyroid disorder characterized by arrested physical and mental development. (see page 1296 in Chapter
268, Hormonal
Disorders) A newborn with low thyroid hormone levels should receive thyroid hormone replacement therapy
by mouth within the
first 7 to 10 days of life. Another disease, phenylketonuria, (see page 1293 in Chapter 267, Metabolic
Disorders) can also cause
mental retardation if untreated.
Many other screening tests may be performed. Examples include screening for homocystinuria, maple syrup
urine disease,
galactosemia, and sickle cell disease. Sometimes the selection of screening tests is guided in part
by the ethnic and genetic
background of the parents. Cost and technical limitations limit routine screening tests in some states.
Length, weight, and head circumference are measured at each visit to the doctor during the first year
of life. At each visit, the
doctor listens to the infant's heart through a stethoscope; abnormal sounds may indicate heart disease.
Also at every visit, the
doctor examines the infant's abdomen, because certain rare cancers, such as Wilms' tumor and neuroblastoma,
can be detected
only as the infant grows. Hearing and vision are tested. An infant who was born prematurely (after spending
less than 37 weeks in
the uterus) is regularly examined for retinopathy of prematurity, an eye disease. (see page 1207 in
Chapter 252, Problems in
Newborns and Infants)
Immunizations
Children should be immunized to protect them against infectious diseases. Vaccines are remarkably safe and effective, although some children occasionally experience minor reactions to them. Most vaccines are given by injection, although a few (such as polio) are given by mouth.
The first vaccine that an infant receives is hepatitis B vaccine, and the first dose of hepatitis
B vaccine is given during the first
week of life, sometimes when the infant is still in the hospital. Other routine immunizations begin
at 6 to 8 weeks, or somewhat
later if the infant is ill. Immunization need not be delayed, however, if the infant has a slight fever
from a mild infection such as an
ordinary cold.
Many vaccines require more than one dose to provide full immunity. Most doctors follow the immunization
schedule
recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, the recommended ages for immunizations should
not be
construed as absolute. For example, 2 months can mean 6 to 10 weeks. Although parents should try to
have their children
vaccinated according to a schedule, some delay doesn't interfere with the final immunity achieved nor
does it entail restarting the
series of injections from the beginning. Some vaccines are recommended under special circumstances.
For example, hepatitis
A vaccine may be recommended for people going to college or for those traveling overseas.
More than one vaccine may be given during a visit to the doctor's office, but several vaccines are often
combined into one
injection, for example, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, and Hemophilus influenzae type b vaccines. A
combination vaccine reduces
the number of injections needed but doesn't compromise the safety or effectiveness of the vaccines.
To help prevent severe
gastroenteritis due to rotavirus infection, an oral rotavirus vaccine is available."
Merck Biology of Blood:
Biology of Blood
The Merck Manual of Medical Information--Home Edition
Section 14. Blood Disorders
Chapter 152
Note, the newborn infant's blood will be low volume and low pressure because of early umbilical cord clamping, often imposed on some babies immediately at birth, and some within 30-seconds, when no clamping of the cord, ever, need to be done, now called the Lotus Birth, but a practice of the Pioneers, prior to the 1920's. These are the nutrients, plus the enzymes and trace elements now deprived the child.
http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_merckmanual_frameset.jsp?pg=http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual_home/sec23/251.jsp
Codes of Honour and Ethics:
Value of children:
http://www.dr-fnlee.org/docs7/thl/thlin.pdf
The Law of God vs Man:
http://www.justinlong.org/wcf/06.htm
Under Hammurabi's code, the death of a fetus caused by the actions of another (e.g. someone striking
a pregnant woman) could
be paid for with silver. In the Law of God, the death of a fetus was to be repaid with a death.
NOTE: THE UNBORN CHILD HAD VALUE BY HAMMURABI'S CODE:
209. If a man strike a free-born woman so that she lose her unborn child, he shall pay ten shekels for
her loss.
210. If the woman die, his daughter shall be put to death.
211. If a woman of the free class lose her child by a blow, he shall pay five shekels in money.
212. If this woman die, he shall pay half a mina.
213. If he strike the maid-servant of a man, and she lose her child, he shall pay two shekels in money.
214. If this maid-servant die, he shall pay one-third of a mina.
PHYSICIANS WERE PAID IF THEY HEALED, AND THEIR HANDS WERE CUT OFF IF THEY FAILED; FINES WERE PAID IF THE PERSON WAS A SLAVE TO THE OWNER'S MASTER:
215. If a physician make a large incision with an operating knife and cure it, or if he open a tumor
(over the eye) with an operating
knife, and saves the eye, he shall receive ten shekels in money.
216. If the patient be a freed man, he receives five shekels.
217. If he be the slave of some one, his owner shall give the physician two shekels.
218. If a physician make a large incision with the operating knife, and kill him, or open a tumor with the operating knife, and cut out the eye, his hands shall be cut off.
219. If a physician make a large incision in the slave of a freed man, and kill him, he shall replace the slave with another slave.
220. If he had opened a tumor with the operating knife, and put out his eye, he shall pay half his value.
221. If a physician heal the broken bone or diseased soft part of a man, the patient shall pay the physician five shekels in money.
222. If he were a freed man he shall pay three shekels.
223. If he were a slave his owner shall pay the physician two shekels.
VETERINARY WERE PAID IF THEY HEALED, AND PAID A PENALTY IF THE ANIMAL DIED:
224. If a veterinary surgeon perform a serious operation on an ass or an ox, and cure it, the owner
shall pay the surgeon one-sixth
of a shekel as a fee.
225. If he perform a serious operation on an ass or ox, and kill it, he shall pay the owner one-fourth of its value.
226. If a barber, without the knowledge of his master, cut the sign of a slave on a slave not to be sold, the hands of this barber shall be cut off.
Link to Oath of Hippocrates
:
www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbith-446.htm
________________________________________________
Other information:
The name Cord Blood suggests just a bit of blood has been deprived a baby. That is a lie. It is a deception. 1/2 cup to 1 cup of blood from 10 ounces can be deprived a baby. This is done secretly. If the baby, in a hospital, shows it is struggling, they correct the harm they caused it and no criminal investigation is done on the medical persons involved in the child's care, and they conceal the evidence of how much blood was deprived the child. Involved, as accessories after the fact, in my opinion, are the nurses and other persons present.
There is much blood in the placenta and the purpose of the blood was not to give it to research, increasing
the profits of the
medical societies involved, but was intended and made for the baby's own expanding lungs.
The umbilical cord is "wrongfully" clamped within seconds of the child's birth, like 30-seconds
or less, and the placenta blood is
drained from the cord, thus the name, cord blood. This almost militant clamping of the child pulsating
cord, is now a trained ritual,
a trend, a habit, a custom, a choice of the doctor. It is done, in most cases, without
informed consent, when no clamping or
cutting of the umbilical cord need be done at all. It is merely cosmetic removal of the organ,
not done years ago.
Amazing how we have been deceived, in trends of maternity matters. This is at least for the common
folk who trusted blindly in
our medical doctors, MD's, you know, Medical Deity. They never guessed why one child was swift and the
other could not tie
his/here shoe laces.
Well, these medical persons alleging they were not informed, and "continued to do this, in secret
and no choice to the mother, will
have a superior Judge, too, some day. Also, there must be a judge for the lab technicians, too. And
all those that are working at
stem cell blood banks, filling of the units of blood, pretending they are not involved in something
harmful when they know they took
the blood from the newborn babies. They were knowingly receiving the trapped off placenta blood,
stored it as to each
separation of the blood's components. They sold it for experiments. They did this without the
evidence of a signed form of
informed consent they had the rights to this baby's blood that they are doing their experiment of
the day. Or, were providing a
collection of blood for transplants, all experimental, too, to hopefully cure diseases that man has
brought on himself, and by our
manner of living, and by our environment, today, and our practices done on our babies, at birth.
THE STRONG PICKING ON THE WEAK:
The placenta blood deprived the baby, who cannot do anything about this evil treatment to the child, in some cases with consent of the parent. But it is believed not by true informed consent. There is a difference and how the decision will make the difference of the child's quality of life, or life itself. The child may be deprived from 50 percent total blood volume deprivation to an average sized baby, even a premature baby. What parent actually agreed to risk their child to be deprived of 4 to 6 ounces of blood, needed for the child's growth after birth and well-being?
The large child, like the 9-pound baby, only made 10 ounces of total blood volume (300 ml). (Ref. World Book, Vol. B, p 324,
1979). that averages one ounce over the child's total weight. This volume of blood and pressure
was needed to keep the baby
from having a hole in the heart, and other internal problems, such as low blood volume, anemia, and
jaundice, and to assure the
baby's had the proper enzymes and proteins and plasma with hormones in it to grow as intended by nature,
and with the proper
emotions too, to fit the child's sex organs and glands.
Do not let your baby be sacrificed to the
God's of Baal,
the new medical science experiment club. There was a Jezebel,
mentioned in II Kings who sacrificed the Nation's babies. A Godly nation does not show such disrespect
to any of their citizens.
But, today, science is sacrificing babies, by taking their blood, at birth. The politicians, the
police officers, the educators, the
religious leaders, the medical persons, all professionals in their duties, have all mocked God in their
duty to protect babies. The
weak are being sacrificed for the informed adult. This is an example of the strong picking on
the weak. Even great nations, of
the past, such as Hammurabi, King of Babylonia, protected its citizens, freeman and slave, from
such exploitation of human
rights and dignity.
Hammurabi built a social order based on the rights of the individual, slave and free man, and
backed by the authority of
Babylonian gods and the state. Hammurabi disciplined doctors who did endangering to another, by
fines, or cutting off their
hand. He disciplined the vets who injured another's animal, by heavy financial fines Hammurabi's
rule was simple: "The strong
shall not injure the weak."
Babies, in the past, or in the present, whether animal or human beings, did not make the adults sick,
man did. Our duty is to the
baby, not for the baby to provide for the sick. Babies, whether animal or human, are not to be
sacrificed for the all mighty dollar
that is backing the questionable ethics in stem cell research, robbing babies of their blood. All
creatures deserve respect and
protection, the strong protecting the weak, not attacking them.
It is deemed a criminal and civil violation to take away the child's plasma, rich in antibodies (white
cells, red cells, stem cells).
What was the benefit to the child, to do hasty clamping? None, unless the cord tore or for placenta
previa. Then immediate
recovery was needed, not delayed, so the child is not impaired, or lessened by replacement of oxygenized
blood. Hopefully,
his/her own.
This is a threat to weakness and to disease. Weakness is to deprived blood. Disease is by the
risk of a tiny virus likely inserted
at the time of birth, by the clamping and the cutting of the cord, and inserting of needles taking blood
samples, and injections of
Vitamin K, and Hep B, and other things...unknown.....
Therefore, it is best to go back to natural child birth. Natural Birth is not complicated: birth in the warmest room possible,
preferably in a warm water tub. Tears are often healed without stitches, and cuts risk infections
to mother and the child, when
done by a medical instrument. Birth in gravity birth positions, or a sideways position. Never
on the back or in semi-sitting
positions. When the child is born, wrap the baby in a warmed towel, keep the placenta cord untouched,
and warm.
When the baby's magical friend is born, the placenta, wrap it too, in warm swaddling cloth, too. Keep
the placenta close to baby,
and keep the mother warm, too. Give her a nice warm drink. Baby should be given to her to
nurse. Do not separate mother and
child, let them bond. Natural birth does that. There is no emergency to measure, or weigh
the child.
IF YOU MUST COSMETICALLY REMOVE THE UMBILICAL CORD...........
All the unnecessary ritual can wait. There are no needs for fire drills in natural birth. There is no need to do blood samples from the child's person. So do not allow pricking of the child's skin. Any blood typing can be done by dried blood, after the placenta has fallen off in a day or two. No need to do cosmetic surgery of this magical friend. But if you do want to cosmetically remove the placenta, perhaps, an hour after the child's birth, when he / she is comfortable, the steps are easy:
- Boil the scissors and the string, and use iodine. (be careful not to get iodine on the child's skin, it may burn).
- After the cord is cut, the baby will have the risk of blood infections from the cut cord, for 8 days to 2 weeks.
- But, no cord infections are at risk of the unclamped and uncut cord. These babies remain a sealed unit, the placenta cord not tied, not cut, falls off in a day or two. The result is a beautiful navel...and a contented baby, with all his her own blood inside their bodies, and not in some test tube. Think first of your own baby's need's not of another. Your baby did not make the other sick. The duty is to "this" child.
- The pioneers with wisdom did this natural birth, prior to about 1920's, in Western Civilizations, and it was never abandoned to those wise in developing nations, to this very day.
- No clamping or cutting the cord, is now given a name, called the Lotus Birth.
It is natural birth with all the wisdom attached to no harm done.
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-scond clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested on child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physcial disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact:
Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother
Home: www.lotusbirth.com
References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
A medical web site to visit:
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
