bullet1 Fetus to Neonate / Adult Circulation System, Diagrams

Fetus Circulation System and the transition to the neonate circulation and the importance to not "clamp"  the umbilical cord. by Donna Young   (www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm)  Revised, December 7, 2003.

    The following Circulation Diagrams, (two) have been taken and edited from reliable medical material, are in red below,  if you wish to go directly there, for a quick observation.  Also at the end of this article is a Petition  for the Canadian Government to stop harvesting of the Canadian Babies.  There is also a diagram in the textbook, Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 10th edition, 2003,Gerard J. Torotora, P. 754, Figure 21-31.

    Nurses have not good excuse, or practical nurses or midwives for participating in early umbilical cord clamping and their failure to record what was done to the baby, on the baby's own individual medical chart.  To do so is to obstruct justice of compensation due the child for unnecessary hardships caused by nutrient deprivation to the child, at birth.  To quote a standard textbooks used in hospitals:


Manual of Nursing Practice , 3rd Edition, The publisher, J. B. Lippincott, Company, Philadelphia & Toronto.1978-1982, stated empirical facts of science, observable if the placenta is drained after immediate cord clamping, that in the circulation changes of the fetus circulation to adult,  these facts, to quote . . .


    " Placental transfusion at birth --increase in blood volume of 60% if cord is clamped and cut "after" pulsation ceases."


    Other facts of important information, the links are at the end of this article.  These are the concerns of a Mother and Grandmother that our babies are needing immediate protection, world wide, from harvesting of their placenta blood and up to 50 percent of the child's total blood volume.  Who would know this happened to the child as they do not move and the weaker ones often then sleep 22 of the 24 hours of the day? Signs of the baby being internally damaged, are jaundice, and later anemia. Some babies are so weak, they cannot nurse, and must be fed then intravenously, or by a bottle, before they can latch on and suck from the breast.  


    This harvesting is a new trend imposed on our babies and a breach of trust of most medical persons doing this, and by deception and concealed intents.  Our MPs and MLAs in Canada, and the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and the Colleges of Midwives, to my investigations, and the training of most basic teachings of the Registered Nurses Associations, must know that their training is absent in the teaching of this important facts of science and medicine--the transition from fetal circulation to the neonate, or adult circulation.  This is unbelievable and cannot be assumed to be accidental, or accidentally missing in most health, science, biology textbooks, and in some encyclopedias.


    My research indicates that high officials, Federally and Provincially, are not upholding the Universal Declarations that over 100 Nations have signed, since1948.  Surmised in those Human Rights Declarations and a Nations Charters and Constitutions are to provide for assurance to the pregnant mother, no harm done to her during birth, or her baby or babies.  This is to her body, or violation to her sensitivities, or harm to her baby by drugs, position of birth, and to the care and treatment of the child, both as full citizens, for equal protection and security of person, during and after birth.  


WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FETUS CIRCULATION AND THE NEONATE'S, THE ADULTS?


    The fetus circulation system is different than the neonate's or the adult's circulation.  It is so highly important that I recommend no medical person be allowed to touch the child's umbilical cord without a signed "Birth Contract" they intend the child no harm. Any medical persons, male or female, doctor or midwife not willing to sign a "birth contract" may be concealing intents not shared they will control and clamp the cord while it is still pulsating.  


    The motive may be others involved taking the child's placenta blood in harvesting for stem cells, they will do this secretly, in most instances, and not with informed consent.  They do this draining of the placenta, while the mother and father are busy and/ or concerned with the progress of their child.  It is a deception of diversion, and it happened in Florida by a female doctor; and in Canada, in Oshawa, by three midwives. This fear tactic, was used first in May, 2003, in Florida,  then in June 2003, in Ontario, involving in both instances, the females, who in both instances, used this fear of bleeding as a total surprise, not discussed in any previous discussions of intent or reasons to clamp off a functioning organ.  This was a last minute emergency assault.  The tactic placed the mother in fear, telling her she may bleed.  


    The facts are, "all" mothers bleed after birth.  The loss of even as much as 4 cups (about 960 ml) is considered normal.  This fear was something I had not put up on my web sites.  It totally took me by surprise.  I am currently trying to find this possible false teaching of a new standard of care and who is behind the deception. It is in all probabilities being used, unethically and criminally, as an excuse to escape criminal and civil prosecution and accountability to the child and to the mother.  It is a breach of trust in the care offered the mother, and paid for by the Province or privately by the mother.  

(This actual photo of the fetus shows the blood vessels in the brain and the brain receives the freshest of oxygen, thus andy drugs or gases given the mother.   http://medstat.med.utah.edu/WebPath/PLACHTML/PERI179.html


(See Comments following diagrams):

FETUS BLOOD CIRCULATION SYSTEM

Note:  Print in Legal Size



NOTE:  I HAVE NEVER SEEN AN ACTUAL PICTURE OF EITHER THE FOREMAN OVALE OR THE DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS.

IF YOU KNOW A SITE WITH AN ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPH, PLEASE LET ME KNOWN dyoung@pris.ca


  




THREAT TO MOTHER AND CHILD BY THE INTERRUPTION OF THE CHILD'S CIRCULATION SYSTEM:


    This fear of bleeding with other "fears" is outside of empirical observable facts of need to clamp the cord.  It is not a legitimate reason to interrupt the baby's lifeline, the circulation system. The deed threatens both mother and child.  The blood clamped in a firm, red, pulsating cord is pushed forwards and backwards and with such a force to cause leakage in the placenta.  


    This is a threat and unnecessary risk to the mother's well being and her means to have healthy children in the future; and risks the blood being pushed too hard in the child's delicate and tiny veins, risking rupture to the vein and valves, in the circulation system, and in the heart.  The baby was also  being cut off from oxygenated blood, and the nutrients of essential enzymes and hormones in the plasma of the blood.  All were needed after birth for the baby's means  to adjust to life on the outside of the womb, with immunities to deal with viruses we are all exposed to, existing in all air.  


    Most medical excuses to interrupt the child's circulation system are best dealt with in courts of law.  Civil for compensation to the child and the mother, and criminal for disciplinary actions to the trainers of false policies as to common nuisance and endangering any one person as to the Criminal Law, Section #180, of the Canadian Criminal Code, as it exists today...protection to all persons, as to the Charter, that includes pregnant birthing mothers and the newborn citizen, the citizens as they were coming through the birth canal.  See this section when the fetus becomes a human being and is protected by Rule of Law: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-353.htm


    A criminal charge of threat of bodily harm does not mean the baby had to die for it to have been risked to endangering.  The section to Lay Information before a Justice of the Peace and all persons at the child's birth that participated and did not report assault, as an obstruction of justice of the child's right for omitting their duty of protection can be found at: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-355.htm


     Only if the cord tore or for an accident for placenta previa, may a cord be clamped.  All other reasons, such as fear of the mother bleeding, short cord, anxious to hold and see the baby, are frivolous reasons, and not likely to stand up in a court of law, for a medical person to interrupt the infant's circulation system.  Therefore, getting rid of the first twin to make allowance for the next, is not allowable. Nor, for short cords, thick blood, too much blood, or too little blood.  All these are frivolous excuses medical persons attempt to use to prevent them from both criminal and civil prosecution.  If tests show them to be present, there are other means to deal with problems other than depriving the baby of 20 to 50 percent total blood volume.  This hasty clamping is reverting to a form of blood letting, and who was cured by blood letting?   Certainly not the "first" USA President, George Washington, eh!


    What are the facts between the fetus to the neonate/adult circulation system.  Special bypass windows are necessary in the fetus circulation system, indicated in Diagram No. 1, below.  These are the Foramen Ovale and the ductus arteriosus.  The placenta's oxygenated blood from the heart's right atrium goes directly to the left atrium through an opening in the heart's septum called the foramen ovale.  


    The foramen ovale sends the blood to the heart's left atrium, that normally receives oxygenated blood from the lungs.  Then the blood is sent down to the heart's left ventricle, then up through the large artery, the aorta. Through the large aorta artery the placenta's oxygenated blood is distributed through three arteries, one to the brain/head and one to each the left and right arms, the upper body.

 

   The fetal placenta blood is bypassing the lungs, not going through the pulmonary artery to the lungs.  The lungs will oxygenize the blood, when the neonate's circulation takes over, soon after birth. The lungs must be allowed to have the placenta blood, that transfuses the blood within 14 minutes after the birth.  


    This placenta blood transfusion time depends on the circumstances of each child. A drugged child, for example, to the research way back in 1957,  by Dr. Mavis Gunther, took from 14 minutes and longer, before all pulsation ceased.  Other circumstances of longer pulsating for the cord to transfuse the blood is compressed cord vessels.  Or, the strength and weakness per the child's individual's strength.  Multiple birth children should be allowed their full share of the blood as to their own needs.  


    The multiple birth babies, twins, and more, are most susceptible to a doctor playing God, or another medical person, clamping the pulsating cord, at will.  This is intervention that requires justification before a court of law.  Nature, the child's own means to control what he/she needs as to being a contributor of the blood supply is who should control the fate of the child's needs, not another man's best guess, not scientific, or with known knowledge.  


    No set standard of time can be imposed on the child, for the umbilical cord clamping, as all children are different. Many doctors were only giving the baby 30 seconds for the placenta transfusion. Some surgeons were immediately cord clamping babies like premature babies and c-section babies at birth.  But it was harmful for the medical person to have been depriving the babies of 20 to 50 percent total blood volume.  The evidence of fact could witness 4 to 6 ounces of total blood volume deprivation of a possible 10 ounces (300 ml) of blood made by a 9-pound baby, in 9-months of gestation.  (Ref World Book, Vol. B, Blood), 1979).


IF THE INFANT'S CIRCULATION IS UNNECESSARILY INTERRUPTED, SERIOUS IMPAIRMENTS MAY RESULT :

    

    If during or after birth the oxygenated blood volume and pressure is stopped to the born child, serious impairments can result, particularly, if the doctors are not skilled to quickly reviving the child with blood volume, not just oxygen, alone. correct revival of any baby, after a traumatic birth is where is, how is, on the umbilical cord.  Not the child clamped and cut from this lifeline/hopeline.  See this web site of the Chow case-law , Ontario, Canada:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-327.htm


NURSES ARE THEY WITNESSES TO A MEDICAL CRIME OR ACCESSORIES IF THEY COVER UP BY FAILURE TO MAKE PROPER AND ACCURATE NOTES OF THE CARE AND TREATMENT TO BOTH THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD?


    What is sad is that the nurses did not say anything and they were accomplices and/or accessories after the fact, as they did not report the matter to the police, for watching and observing medical assault and battery, by hasty clamping on a functioning organ, the umbilical cord.  The nurses have alleged they did not see the below diagram during any of their training, of the difference between the fetus to neonate circulation systems. These are not the registered-nurse-midwives.  


     Who then controlled the teaching of the basics on circulation  and felt the fetus not important to discuss.  Such  training is important to child birth. It is a serious absence in imperative empirical science information to be absent in curriculums and in most biology books, or most of them.  


    Those who have the most to gain by incomplete information are the drug companies and the services treating those injured in child birth.  All fields of medicine would reap from the injuries caused needlessly at birth, in improper care and to mother and the child.   For example:  heart, vision, hearing, muscle, diabetic care, and so forth, can be resulting internal injuries how the child is cared for during labor and after birth.  There would be perceived motive to conceal and not report endangering practices, would there not?


MOTHERS TRUSTING IN THE MEDICAL PROVIDER, ARE NOT BEING EDUCATED, TRUTHFULLY,

    AT GOVERNMENT INFLUENCED PRENATAL CLASSES OR DURING MEDICAL PRENATAL VISITS:


    The mothers, were not wisely birth educated.  This is true, even if they had a university education (female doctors and lawyers repeating the mistakes of the last 3 and 4th generation of women not treated with respect, nor the child).  They, too, in many instances, could not  know to report the deed,  of endangering medical practices imposed on their own babies.  While the women vote, in Democratic societies, they are not emancipated in child birth, as those who gave birth prior to the 1920's.  There is no public forum to deal with this issue on child birth care, Active Management that the most risks take form, not natural birth.  Such a forum would have the necessary discipline following, like they had on the Blood Supply of Canada, the Krever Report.  


    This investigation, a Commissioned Inquiry, using the evidence Act, is now being followed with criminal prosecution of medical persons involved in silence on the blood supply once contaminated.  The result was the confidence of the medical services were violated, even to one person risked of harm.  The medical Colleges of Physicians an Surgeons, contracted to protect the public.  But did not allow such a forum on their policies in training of doctors in trends, outside of empirical science, and keeping their training and intents in child birth, secret, in most instances to the mother, and in most institutions allowed to do child birth services.  


    The mother, not informed, could not make alternative and safer choices for no clamping or cutting the cord for cosmetic removal of the lifeline; nor for no drugged births, in institutions, she was led to believe were safe to birth her babies.  Now it appears the return to unassisted births in our security of our own homes, at our own time schedules not the doctors, are best after all, what our grandmothers had, prior to the 1920's.  As long as the mother was not drugged or cut, the mother and babies did fine, in 95 percent of all births.  The rate of c-sections were not 23 to 25 percent at those times, but were true emergencies births, in most instances.  Mortality rates in the United States ranks 28th in comparison to other countries, yet their fee for maternity services are at, or over $20 billion dollars.  


LACK OF DOCUMENTATION OF THE TIMING OF THE CLAMPING OF THE CORD -- ALLEGED NOT IMPORTANT-- BUT CONCEALS A MEANS OF INVESTIGATION OF IATROGENIC CAUSED PROBLEMATIC CHILDREN, LATER ON:


    By tradition, and not according to proper standards, the medical persons were not factually recording the care and treatment on the baby's own medical records, thinking it not important for them, to do so.  This is to their own peril, the benefit of the doubt going to the victim.


      And this failure to record the care and treatment to the child, after birth, apparently, was a tradition world wide.  Imagine, a tradition not to record the care and treatment to the child regarding the timing of the clamping of the cord, or the condition of the cord when clamped.  Such as the cord when clamped was red, firm, and pulsating and done immediately at birth, before the baby was allowed to take the first breath with blood in the lungs.  The lungs first aerated by the placenta blood, the placenta yet attached inside the mother's womb. Once the blood in the placenta is in the baby, the baby can then take his/her first breath on his own, with the lungs now prepared to continue the gas exchanges.  All things done decently and in order, not causing interventions.  


CHILDREN DO EXPERIENCE PAIN FROM CELLS DEPRIVED OF OXYGENATED BLOOD :


     Most persons know the pain of lack of oxygen to any cell of their body, such as a frozen limb, or a limb that has gone to sleep, or those who have had a heart attack.  The same pain is experienced of the child clamped off blood flow with oxygen in the blood stopped, suddenly to any part of the body, including the brain cells and the nerve cells.  The nerve cells once killed do not replace themselves, or so I have read.  Not like skin cells and blood cells.

    

    What happens when oxygen and blood is cut off?:  Unless drugged, the child screams in pain, in most instances, from the circulation interruption.   This is like a heart attack, a sudden stoppage of the oxygenated blood source.  Also the cold room stops the flow of blood too, the baby is wet, coming from a warm womb, and hitting the cold air. The room should have been warmed and the baby received in a warmed towel, at birth, wiped down, and mucus gently removed from throat and nose and ears. Women birthing in warm water are most wise, and to immediately bring the baby's face out of the water, like the whales do.  


ABSENT BIRTH CARE AND TREATMENT RECORDS:


    If the care and treatment records are missing by both the nurse and the doctor, the mother and the father would never know why each one of their children were different as to night and day.  Most sick children never have their birth records reviewed with the parents, when getting treatments.  Questions of parental habits are asked, never a question on medical care at birth.  Why is that?  No investigation of which of the babies had been drugged at birth and who were immediately cord clamped, then their injuries compounded by questionable vaccinations, while anemic.   How some children struggled so hard to gain what skills and abilities they did. How many turned to drugs to deal with their lack of confidence or nervousness?   And, why one child, not drugged at birth, nor immediately cord clamped, just happened to breeze through school.  


    Do we credit Better Genes?  No?  We must consider there was the luck of the medical person's conscience, that some doctors let a few babies slip through without quickly clamping off the lifeline, the hopeline, the genius potential of that particular child. They may have done that for a few children, per family, that is allowed a few to be okay, not impaired, truly blue ribbon babies.    


ALL ARE TO BE BORN EQUAL:


    But it was important "all" babies to have their legal rights defended, EQUAL PROTECTION AND EQUAL SECURITY OF PERSON.   And, to know why they had more difficultly when life is already difficult and the doctors and nurses concealed the truth of their teaching and in participation in negligent child delivery care and services.   


    Many children were delayed in their abilities by 3 or 4 years, as though they were Fetal Alcoholic Symptom children. It was as though their mothers took drugs from conception to birth.  These children did not have the outward physical facial tell-tale signs, but they had lesions on the brain.  Some had holes in the heart.  Some had lung problems.  Unless infancy training was done immediately after hasty umbilical cord clamping, and watching for anemia, many of these babies would not reach their fullest potential.  Some would have injuries more severe to affect their chances of choices of occupations, as to their will and desires. They were like recovering stroke victims. This is not allowing all babies to be born equal.  


NEWS MEDIA PROTECTING BIG MEDICAL BUSINESSES:


    When parents went to the press and the major news media and radio they would only support Big Business who were involved in taking the babies cord stem cell blood. Every tv and radio show and major news media were promoting the taking the baby's stem cells. See Premature Baby gives stem cells to mother,   Lloyd Robertson , CTV story.  What is missing in this story was the size of the baby, gestation when born, how born, c-section or vaginal birth, and the amount of blood actually drained from the placenta.  It supported even the weakest of babies to be harvested, a true commerical, rather then a well documented news story.  CBC tv has also done such a story.  CBC had done such a story every year, so we can watch for the news media promoting stem cell collection from our babies, this Fall, 2003.


    Did a premature baby have legal rights to security of person, not being 110 pounds, age 17, and known to be in good health at the time of hasty clamping.  Yes.  This is the Criminal code to protect the fetus as it becomes a human being, according to the Canadian Criminal Code:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-353.htm


     Imagine the strong encouraging the robbing the disadvantaged, the helpless, the babies.  Might they forgive us?  Is this a conspiracy by organized Big Business?  The news media, apparently not informed on this matter, nor would they assign a reporter, would not tell the truth babies were being weakened and endangered by hasty clamping, then harvested for their blood, for the newest trend, stem cells.  And, that some babies died and had no investigation by the Coroners. It is very sad for Western Societies, alleged to be Democratic with Charter of Rights, that they do not protect all by no discrimination by age, sex, race, color, marital status, or belief or mental or physical disadvantage, as are the babies.  And we call Saddam a bad man?!


Jaundice and Anemia result when the neonate's circulation system is interrupted:


     Many babies were being internally damaged by low blood volume and low pressure. They were caused to be jaundiced and to be anemic. Jaundice is caused by excessive death of red blood cells. The baby's body was not having the blood that was in the placenta to make use of  the iron now in excess in the baby's body.  


    The excess iron was then seen in yellow-green color of the eyes and in the skin. Iron remains in the baby's body, when the blood cells die. Lack of oxygen causes cell death.  The iron is to be reused and the proteins to recreate more cells, but too many oxygen carrying red cells died at one time. Later the baby could be found to be anemic at each time they were to have a spurt of growth, or they were simply not growing.  The parents did not know to take criminal charges against the medical persons violating babies and selling the stem cell blood trapped in he placentas, and for personal profit and gain.  



For the Adult Circulation of the heart, see: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-100.htm


For the visual picture of a full placenta, the baby deprived from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, see:

www.lotusbirth.com /doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-175.htm


    The Neonate Circulation or adult circulation starts fully when the blood from the placenta is in the baby.  The baby may be on a dual system, getting oxygen blood from the placenta and transfusion into the lungs now expanding and taking in the blood to do the gas exchanges, and the baby breathing on his own.  But the time for breathing is best for baby's time, and not forced by a stranger, imposed on another's child:  in a "breathe or else choice" by clamping off the child's lifeline.  


    While the child is being wrapped in a warm towel and his nose wiped gently, and the mucus from his /her mouth, the baby should still be on their umbilical cord, the lifeline.  This provides them with optimal health and well being.  Early clamping can impair and rob the child of his/her fullest potential, even their genius abilities.  That is like taking away expectation of profits to some giant corporation.  


    When the placenta is empty (the blood now in the baby as it was created just right for the baby's weight and size),  the placenta will then be pulling away from the womb.  The baby will be breathing and able to be strong to snuggle and nurse, all, yet on the umbilical cord and unclamped.  The cord is generally 22 inches long, or longer.  I have heard stories of a cord only 6 inches, but have never seen the evidence, of that fact, after the placenta was born.  There No need to clamp or tie the cord, ever, unless for placenta previa or the cord tore.  Both must be investigated for medical malpractice.  Many of the wiser pioneers did not do this tying off the pulsating cord.  Consequently, those that did not, had strong healthy babies, with longevity, in most instances.


     Babies only died, in home births, if there were medical interventions by cutting the cord or cutting the mother, or using instruments on the child. They would die of blood infections, too, like millions of babies who are having their cords cut by Western Societies interventions in third would countries, today.  So threats of medical interventions, unhealthy practices, are still true, today.  But the infections are cleared up by drugs, if available.  Such procedures are not natural child birth, which are a women's right to have and not be lied to about drugs making childbirth painless.  Nothing can be further from the truth. Drugs and hasty clamping are bound to give the family a life time of challenges of raising a compromised child. This is the child who looks normal but does not meet his/her own expectations, let alone other's, or in some cases, societies.  


    Child birth labor discomfort is natural, and drugs interrupt natural hormones that allow the woman to control the labor to her and the baby's best interest.  Nothing in labor is so severe that cannot be managed by moving, having a warm bath, laboring and birthing "in" water; or having a warm cup of beverage, like red raspberry tea (see contents list), may help.  


    While drugs may clear up infections, they still weaken the natural bacteria leading to both mother and the child to have yeast infections.  Instruments also cause staph infections.


WEAKENING THE BABIES CIRCULATION SYSTEM:


     Babies are not to donate blood, it is not a requirement of them, and no court court would order a baby to give tests of blood or samples to anyone.  Unless the baby was sick and it was for his /her own best interest to do so.  


Key Points:  If the baby is clamped off the placenta blood flow the baby’s lungs may be damaged.  This is because the lungs will not have had full blood volume and pressure in them for that first breathe. The arteries will shut off on their own, controlled by the infant.  The vein will remain open to continue the emptying of the placenta, into the baby, and the heart controls this and how fast the blood transfusion takes place.  The veins have valves in them, to hold the pressure.  This blood transfusion continues as long as the baby is kept warm, as cold air will stop the flow of blood, and shock the baby, in the same way as a cold steel clamp.  


    If the placenta is born soon after the baby, keep it wrapped in a warm towel, to allow the blood transfusion to continue.  No need to clamp the cord or cut the cord, as the Pioneers did not do that. Today, that care and treatment of no removal of the placenta is the Lotus Birth. It is most wise.  The placenta and cord are healed in two days, and that beats 8 days to two weeks of a cut cord and risk of infections.  No cut cord, to infections.  No clamped cord, also assures the child  of his constitutional legal rights, to "all" his/her own blood being in his body, not in some test tube.  

These are concerns, known in the 1960's, evidence of fact doctors ought to have known they were causing damage to babies, showing up later in latent disorders, but common factors could be traced to hasty clamping and drugs during the birth of the baby, done in our institutions and by the specific training of the doctors to clamp the pulsating and functioning cord.  These are examples of concern, documented in The Magical Child,  the link is below for more information, taken from the Chapter, Time Bomb, pages 48-50:

    •     Newell Kephart, director of the Achievement Center for Children at Purdue University, finds learning and behavior problems resulting from minor undetected brain injury in 15 - 20% of all children examined.

    • Goldberg and Schiffman estimate that 20-40% of our school population is handicapped by learning problems that may be related to "neurological impairments at birth.  

"Windle closed his report, published in Scientific American in 1969  , with this comment:

    • "Our experiments have taught us that birth asphyxia lasting long enough to make resuscitation necessary always damages the brain..... a great many human infants have to be resuscitated at birth.

    • We assume that their brains, too, have been damaged. there is reason to believe that the number of human beings in the USA with minimal brain damage due to asphyxia at birth is much larger than has been thought  .

    • Perhaps it is time to reexamine current practices of childbirth with a view to avoiding conditions that give rise to asphyxia."


Another source of concern of hasty clamping, was by a medical journalist Cory Mermer, link below.  Cory Mermer, shared this information, including also Dr. Windel's observations:


Early Clamping of the Umbilical Cord: Cutting the Ties That Bind

by Cory A. Mermer http://www.cordclamping.com/mermer1.htm


"Brain Damage and Asphyxia

  • A significant number of infants suffer permanent brain damage during the birth process, often without parents or doctors even realizing it has occurred. Years ago, a report by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development estimated the number of such cases to be so great as to exceed "the combined annual number of deaths from all types of cancer, the number of deaths in automobile accidents each year, and the total loss of American life in the war effort in Vietnam" 45. Admittedly, it is quite possible that this number has gone down significantly in the years since these comments were published. However, it is probably still not a rare occurrence and may have even gone up.
  • One researcher, Dr. Abraham Towbin, in the Journal of the American Medical Association, maintained that oxygen deprivation causing minimal brain damage is a common occurrence that is not generally realized. While severe and obvious brain damage and even death can occur after a relatively long period of oxygen deprivation, shorter periods can cause lesser damage, which may go unnoticed until later in life where it can manifest itself as a learning difficulty or behavioral problem 46.
    • He made the following extremely disturbing observation 46:

With the brain marred at birth, the potential of performance may be reduced from that of a genius to that of a plain child, or less. The damage may be slight, imperceptible clinically, or it may spell the difference between brothers, one a dexterous athlete and the other 'an awkward child'.

  • Dr. William Windle, a former research director at The Institute of Rehabilitative Medicine at the New York Medical Center, made the assertion that any infant that has asphyxia long enough to require resuscitation at birth will almost certainly have brain damage as a result. The number of people with minimal brain damage, in his opinion, is much larger than is widely thought. Citing experiments performed on monkeys in two National Institutes of Health laboratories, he asserted that even infants who seem to recover fully will most likely have permanent brain lesions that may cause subtle deficiencies in memory or behavior 14. "


Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.

We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.

________________________________________________________________


    Protect your baby.  Have a signed Birth Contract that only the mother can change her mind. A contract the courts will acknowledge, therefore a birth plan is not sufficient to protect the babies from harm, and the mothers, too.  The facts to be told the mother is that the medical person (s) cannot impose a care or treatment  that was not agreed to. And, appropriate care forms are not informed consent.  


    If the doctor is not sure of his/her training and the ethics involved and endangering the child by hasty clamping or their perceived allowance to clamp a functioning organ alone, it is best to birth unassisted.  This is the mother's right for either a home birth, or a hospital birth.  It is the mother rights to rule over her own body, as having a baby is not a sickness, nor requires treatment, in 95 percent of all pregnancies.  If no medical person signed a birth contract, nor put their training and intent and reasons why in written form, it may be wiser to birth unassisted, in the convenience and safety of one's own home, like our grandmother's the pioneers did, so long ago.  


    By unassisted this means only have those you trust with you, so you are not alone.  No one that intends the child endangering to sell their placenta or the placenta blood, should be there, having a conflict of interest.  What mother would knowingly contract to endanger her baby, making it weaker that he/she ought to be, knowing babies have, too, the right to equal protection and security of person.  


    We cannot know the truth of the safety in stem cells, that are grown from every specific part of the internal organs, and the baby, what is he she deprived of, quality of red blood to carry oxygen to all tissues and cells, white cells to fight infection, unique and delicate hormones and enzymes, special for that baby's own needs, plasma, platelets, vitamins and minerals.  


    Educate those who have your and the baby's best interest at heart, to do neither one risk of harm.  That is a natural birth.  No harm done.  In position, in no clamping of the cord, in having no chance of infections by a cut body. To give up no samples of your blood or that of the baby's and to know the tissue is witnessed destroyed, if you do consent to samples taken from the mother's body, but for a healthy baby, you do not need genetic testing, revealing the family's background to anyone. Certainly not the State, the Province, or the Territory.  If that information was taken without informed consent, or right to say no, deal with it.  


    It is all mother's legal right to birth, undrugged, and to have an unassisted birth. This is best described as a no hands on birth. No one touches the baby's lifeline, hopeline even for an compromised child.  Revival, is always best done where is, how is, on the cord.  That is the best lifeline a mother can provide for her baby, or babies.  Even, if you do birth in a hospital...but you have to give a waiver, you can have that unassisted birth, the informed mother in control.  The uneducated mother not exploited, nor her baby harvested for stem cells.


    Again, if no medical person's signature is willingly placed on the birth contract, birth, again, at home.  If it is an iffy situation who actually will be with you when your child is to be born, a change of doctors, they must sign the birth plan, or have all before the court if a violation of the mother's rights or the child's occurred without informed consent to any alternative decision.  


    There is no complications in childbirth that were not likely caused by interventions and inductions using creams, gels, and powers, pills, and injections.  It is wise to first say no to scans and drugs. Try to allow yourself a full 40 weeks from conception for the baby to determine when the time, he or she intends to be born on this Planet Earth. The babies know all about their birth womb. Giants and pigmies females have all birthed just fine.   


    There is nothing illegal about having an unassisted birth, if the mother and the father intend no harm to their baby. There is no assured safety, today, in any hospital birth or medical person's care, other then in check ups if the mother is not feeling well. This is because of the false policies and false information in emergency and biology textbooks and the false or withheld information in prenatal classes run by the controls of the government on the registered nurses teaching that specific course material.  I use the wisdom of books of long ago, and current studies too.  


    No threat of the Social Services can make you birth in any location or with any specific person. All you need to do is show them the millions of babies violated by the clamp, false birth positions, infections by cutting the woman, and robbing the babies of 20 to 50 percent of total blood volume, and then vaccinating the baby even to 6 separate shots, while yet anemic, and before the 2nd month of birth.  (See the Yurko Project this web site).  


    Ask for your money back for any prenatal class you paid for because there was no free discussion allowed. The mothers were being controlled as the nurses being agents of the system.  At the time of this article was written, August , 2003, the registered nurses in charge of that prenatal class could not add or subtract material, or use intelligence or being reasonably thinking persons. They like robots were repeating false information told to them, and not doing independent research.  


    What I discovered when I checked the local practical nurses training is that the trainers, RNs were telling the students to expect to see the doctor do clamping on a pulsating cord for the "fear of a child having jaundiced." The biology books at the college were false too, and the science books, like a Child is Born, the 1993 edition directing immediate umbilical cord clamping. The students did not know how or where to question this misleading information or from the source it was being given.


    The instructors were  passing on false information, and were often "smug" about it. Haughtily arrogant, they were, if questioned by lay persons.  They misused their degrees.  Not even themselves can be educated on the truth of right of personal birth contracts.  Nor, direct a mother to the internet for experienced mothers and grandmothers input who are now willing to admit we were conned, and treated like dumb bunnies.  We hope that will not be your fate, too.  But most registered nurses do not know the difference between the fetal and the neonate/adult circulation system, as I have spent over a day to make this informaiton available to you.


     Information is from the World Book Dictionary and Encyclopedias, and other medical books of long ago. I use these because facts of empirical science do not change with time.  Nor, do good ethical and competent training of medical practices. What does change is values and ethics and motives.  Motives today for supporting around the world is Big Business are harvesting babies, sick babies and well babies.  it makes no difference from whom they will take from, their blood.  


    You do not have to trust any medical person blindly, nor let them touch your body. Their policies cannot take away your individual choice.  You are not their prisoner, or fair game, nor your baby. Defend yourself, and that is seeing the facilities in the local hospital, even before you plan a baby, get their policies you are expected to sign. Speak to the mother who just gave birth. Ask her questions, like did she know you did not have to clamp or cut the cord?  Or, that procedure, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa was only a cosmetic removal, unless the cord tore, or for placenta previa? Did she know where the placenta's blood trapped in it went or how much?  Ask lots of questions. Get the name of the doctor.  


    Facts of recent births:  Many women and men brag and the medical person did not cut  the cord for a very long time.  They were both treated like dumb bunnies because the medical persons, for his own motives and /or medical reasons, not consented to, had already clamped the cord.   The clamp did the blood and hormones and nutrient deprivation to your baby.  


    The attitude of the medical person was only that the mother and the baby lived, in spite of the endangering, and needlessly endangering to yet internal injuries to be a Time Bomb, when they might yet surface.  See The Magical Child, pages 48-50.  A brain lesion may be present a birth by even the slightest interruption of oxygenated blood flow to the brain and nervous system, too. They may both have virus lurking in their body by the clamping and the cutting of the cord.  And by any injections of needles put into the baby's umbilical cord, the vein, or his/her heel.  Or the mothers, while the baby was yet in her womb. It is wiser to go with undrugged and natural births.  


    If you happened to die, or the child, the attitude is, so what.  This is because most Coroner's are not trained on the above fetal to infant circulation system.  They do not know to check for blood deprivation when the baby dies.  It has been a major deception to generations of women, except those yet unharmed by Western Societies organization on collecting blood from babies, by early clamped placentas.  These may be women of a small village in yet third world countries.  Most women of the developed world are being manipulated in "active management."  


    The mothers are birthing in hospitals at their peril.  Most do not know they are safer in home births with a non-professional person there, or if there, under contract to remain in a different room, so not to scare the mother, in birth, or to touch the child in an invasive manner or the child's cord.  


    According to the research of Judith S. Mercer, the majority of midwives are indifferent to the timing of the clamping of the cord, and the doctors have not been investigated, since the 1950's as to changes of their trends.  Therefore, only a signed birth contract on this issue brings out concealed intent and intent to control as to their own convenience and withheld information as to when they will clamp a pulsating cord. The warning is out on all medical persons, too, as to false training to clamp the cord and control the woman in a flat on the back position.  


    Control and power seems part of the care and treatment of the mother, not giving her freedom and quick education of gravity births, and not to clamp the cord...key facts of natural child birth, or a sideways position of birth, if the mother is tired.


     Only two reasons stand up in law, when to clamp a cord :  the cord tore or for placenta previa.  All other situations were fears...and how did the medical person substantiate a fear without informed consent?  They had to be doing something to cause a condition not discussed in prenatal sessions or with the signing of the contract to leave the cord alone, for the Lotus Birth, if sought, and wisely to protect the child from the risk of too soon clamping.


DOCTORS POLICIES AND HOSPITAL POLICIES MUST BE CHALLENGED IN THE COURTS,

     IF NOT INFORMED CONSENT:

    No investigation is intended if the medical person did that performance being a licensed agent of the system.  That includes the hospital or the birth center, and their being part of the Colleges of Midwives, Physicians and Surgeons, and Medics and Doula associations.  They are bound to stick together, and not necessarily for societies best interest or least harm done.  They have means to be paid for collection of human organs, such as the placenta and the volume of blood trapped in it by the clamp. They have all assumed not to be examined before a criminal court for unnecessary and no benefit to the child or the mother for imposed medical care and treatment, not needed in natural birth


    False teaching may be regarded and allowed to go to criminal court for Common Nuisance, as to false policies and trends allowed by the medical authorities  They are or most of them are gaining, directly or indirectly, repeat medical business in sick mothers or sick babies after child birth.  They should not have caused iatrogenic disorders, distress, disease, or death, the 4-D's, as I call them.  This is if natural and best practice possible was offered and allowed the mother.  Birth is a simple plan, not complicated, in 95 percent of all births.  


HARVESTING BABIES FOR THEIR PLACENTA BLOOD, EVEN IF ALL DO NOT DIE, IS A CRIME:


    Harvesting babies must be considered a crime on their persons, assault, battery, attempted murder, homicide or first degree murder if the child died, or the mother.


    Informed consent is the known risk to mother for her options of safer best practice possible.  That is NOT offered in most hospital births, and by the current training of the medical persons.  It is getting better in some areas of conventions, but the conventions do not make policies or Resolutions.  Nor, do they join like-minded persons in no harm done, informed choice, and a signed birth plan dealing with the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord, if it is done at all.  Why not?  


PREACHING TO THE CHOIR:


    Preaching to the choir means seeing organization to bring those who preach indifference of medical common nuisance that endangers even one baby or one mother, need to have the choir sing, the same chorus, to the court.  That is how to stop false medical malpractice from continuing on and on to the next generations.  Going public, as I have done, is recommended.  When thousands of women write their politicians and sign petitions, and start filing Writs and criminal charges, then things may change quicker.   This is  a human violation and a form of discrimination to mother and child.  That we have many past victims, in the millions, is no reason they are dealt with, one to one, as the individuals organize or deal with it on criminal complaint.  


    Drugging the mothers or cutting their bodies need not have been done by policies that did not have informed consent.  No informed consent means assault and battery to both mother and the child.   Informed consent does not mean the doctor or midwife told them their intent, it means the mother had a choice of natural birth, no drugging and no clamping off the cord, not active management imposed on them.  It means they had been told about and allowed warm water births and to catch their own babies, not a stranger who intended to clamp the pulsating cord for any reason they thought of at the last moment, like short cord, or fear of the mother bleeding.  Those are not legitimate reasons to clamp a cord, nor for to make time for the next baby, if a twin.


    Going Public:  Put a Sworn Declaration on the Internet.  State the doctors name, the nurses name, where they trained, the hospital, and date and time of birth, and what they did to breach your fiduciary trust.  Going  public changes false teaching and practices.  You have the experience, so preach it.  Declare it as wrong, if you do know, now, right from wrong.


MOCK TRAIL OF MEDICAL PERSONS CHARGED WITH UNNECESSARY MEDICAL PROCEDURE:


 Know that the current trend of doing hasty clamping to endanger mother and baby is fear of the mother bleeding.  Why a fear? Well, the medical person can say before a criminal judge:


    Medical Person: " I believed it was a medical benefit to the mother.  While I knew it would be harmful to the child, so I made the err of judgement in favor of the mother."


    Judge: " What was the evidence you knew and the mother did not know she may bleed to death, if that was a fact of medical judgment?"


    Medial Person: " Well, your honor I slipped the mother a drug that would cause heavier and harsher contractions of the placenta, so I quickly clamped the cord, cut it to remove the child from my inconvenience, and then I pressed down on her stomach. And I tugged and pulled on the cord to get the placenta out faster.  I feared after giving the drug without her known consent of the side effects, the placenta may be trapped in the womb, and she would need a operation to get it out."


    Judge: "And was that part of the agreed plan. To drug the mother?


    Medical Person:  "No!".  


    Judge:  "Then,  I charge you with two counts of medical assault and battery, and the sentence is two years in jail, and community work, and your license to be suspected for five years, not to touch another baby or birthing mother. "


    NOTE  Mothers must be told the truth about hormones and risk of artificial hormones, like oxytocin, pitocin:

  •       Many medical persons secretly drug the woman with oxytocins during the actual birth of the baby.  They then fear the placenta will be trapped in the womb by too soon clamping down on a full placenta.  Oxytocin does not stop bleeding, as women are deceived to be then injected with this drug.  The drug works on the muscles.  The components of blood that seal off torn blood vessels to stop bleeding are platelets and serotonin .   

  •     "When tissues are damaged, the platelets disintegrate, releasing serotonin.  The serotonin constricts the blood vessels and prevents more bleeding.  Serotonin is also present in the brain and intestinal tract.  Some drugs affect brain function by preventing the release of serotonin. " (World Book, Vol. S-Sn, p 248, 1979).

  •     Morphine affects the brain.  It is a commonly used drug in child birth, and used without informed consent.  It is often used with oxytocin, as a combination drug.  Women are given these drugs without true informed consent.

  

  •      The World Health Organization (1998 review on timing of the clamping of the lifeline),  is implicated in NOT warning the woman of the dangers of being injected with oxytocins, for they directed the mother and the child to be endangered by calling for immediate and early cord clamping of the child, if oxytocin were used.  


    The mother is not warned in Canada or the United States, by the Food and Drug authorities.  This is of any research facts, alleged by WHO, of the dangers of the artificial drug, that goes by the name Pitocin, Oxytocin, Toesen, or Syntocinon.  WHO's implication was by Dupont, who created the clamping and cutting too, Umbicut.  See: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-203.htm


SWORN DECLARATIONS ARE NECESSARY BECAUSE THERE ARE NO FORUMS ON THE PRESENT CONCERNS:

    That would be justice for just assault a threat to the baby, the mother and baby not having to die for criminal charges to be alleged and  hearing in the court, so I believe.  A third party allegations of a child being endangered are to the conscience of the person with knowledge of a child or mother, or both, who were endangered.  And needlessly.  No fact of evidence for the risk taking.


     The duty of medical persons are to report any endangered child.  but medical doctors think their duty is only to report the parents, and not their own endangering of the child and mother, during birth, to the police and by doing unnecessary medical procedures without informed choice for undrugged natural births, and warm water births.


     There is implied duty to all citizens even in medical matters to go to the Court for them to be the fact finders if the care and treatment of a person is endangering and not with the persons means to prevent medical injury and assault and battery or death by the medical persons abusing powers and privileges. They have done many medical procedures without informed consent, and all criminal laws apply to them equally, as to Rule of Law.  


WHEN MIGHT A UMBILICAL CORD BE "CLAMPED?"


     Only if the placenta cord tore or for placenta previa, can the cord be clamped.  And those two situations, too, they must have an investigation, open to the public, if the mother wishes, a criminal hearing, if that was medical negligence in those conditions present.


    Who is willing to share that they were deceived in most of their births. Many are on the Internet so sharing, Birthlove for one web site.   All they did in the past, like myself, was get ourselves pregnant, then delivered our bodies to the doctor to take the babies from our bodies.


    We were treated like dumb bunnies because we were.  Not necessarily all our own fault.  We had few means to the facts of science.  This was because of the false information being provided in school, science, health and in the controlled prenatal classes. Much of the information was biased presented by conflict of interest by the drug companies, one being Merck, in their medical manuals.  All are wanting.   I demonstrate such wayward information in my references, below, the false information and the control of withheld information in prenatal classes ruled over by policy and curriculum of those that get paid by the government.  Who are paid, those on committees and design the reproduction courses and the care and the treatment of the pregnant lady and the care of the child, at birth. Often they are supported with government grants from Health Canada, or similar agents in other nations, at the Federal level. They do not provide for forums or concerns of the public to have an influence.  It then must go to the courts for those responsible for the continued negligent care on maternity matters and treatment to the newborn child.


TRUST WAS BREACHED, AND MANY HAVE BEEN LIED TO THE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT.  IT WAS A CONVENIENCE OF TIME FACTORS FOR MEDICAL STAFF, IN MOST CASES:


    It is fairer statement to say of us women, who gave birth in the past is that our trust was breached and violated by those we trusted to do us no harm or our babies.  That did not happen for many of us, and the deception going on today, must stop.  Drugs replaced nurses tying the mother's legs together for the doctor to arrive to catch his/her fee.  Both methods were wrong and a violation to the mother and child's trust of no harm done.


    Both male and females, in medical fields, including lab technicians receiving blood samples from unconsented patients, now are violating the trust of women and the child.  Both, equally now, as to the academic training of career ladies, must be taken before the courts. See Are Medical Services Safe?.  


    Mothers were drugged in child birth without informed consent.  The placentas with the evidence of the drug crossing the placenta could be the proof and the billing of the drugs used. All mothers have a legal right to see the billings for their care and treatment to themselves and the child.  The forensic investigation for medical assault can be found the evidenced of the drug that crossed the placenta, and in the mother's blood and in the urine, and in the amniotic fluid too.  This is a criminal assault and must be treated as such, as pregnancy is not a sickness, and should not be treated as such.  


    The medical associations and societies in charge of much of the education were formed with their first duty to protect the public.  You do not do that by exploiting the birthing mother or harvesting her baby of blood by deceptive birth practices.  That it has been done secretly, does not make these societies right, nor the hospitals that allowed them to be done secretly, on their premises.


THOUSANDS TO MILLIONS OF VICTIMS ARE CREATED BY FALSE MEDICAL MATERNITY PRACTICES

    CAUSING MOSTLY INTERNAL INJURIES:

    Great harm is to the public's purse in paying for the care of serious impaired children, many now adults, with limited means of enjoyment of life and challenges limited. They have a right to compensation.  After criminal success on this issue, then the medical insurance companies now paying for this medial assault on babies and must pay the victims for injuries.  Those resulting from the doctors and midwives false training, can deal with criminal charges making those who had a duty to report false practices and did not do so to the police, to protect children under 10 years of age.  Successful criminal charges may have their personal assets taken to pay for their participation in harm to others.


     Then we have used the courts, which are non-violent, to  influenced change when the individual pocket books balance the harm done to others as to their choice of participation.  In this way it is not just the tax payers that pay for the harm to others in higher costs for medical services through higher taxation..


    Let us hope the women birthing tomorrow will learn from the past mistakes imposed on the women of the past 3 and 4 generations, some living to this date.  And their children.    It is wise to have a signed birth contract.  This is so the women is not treated with disrespect to her rights to a natural birth.  This contract is signed before the woman gets pregnant.  


    If we women do not know our history, we repeat it. Most of our grandmothers birthed naturally, and unassisted.  They did just fine.  Look at the Third World Development,  Only nutritional deficiency in lack of diet caused their harm, not their natural birth methods, no hands on, in most cases, if Western Societies did not interfere with natural customs.  Many had natural no tying off the cord, as stated by the World Health Organizations, and they stated, no harm done.  We can see no harm done, today, and known that was true in the past.


      If the woman opts for a Pioneer's Unassisted Birth, it may be wise to tell no one --Just do it with your trusted love ones present.  


LINKS FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE:


Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.

We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.



Medical Web site on the issue of dangers of umbilical cord clamping :   www.cordclamping.com


This Web page:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm


Thick Blood that I suspect is caused by morphines and oxytocins, and these two drugs combined with other drugs.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-169.htm


Shock because of blood loss:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-133.htm


A full Placenta by early umbilical cord clamping:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-99.htm

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-175.htm


Adult Heart Circulation:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-100.htm


Canadian Children with Attention Deficit Disorders, over 200,000

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-252.htm


Dangers of Oxytocin, Pitocin, Syntocinon

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-190.htm


World Health Organization and Dupont's Clamping and Cutting Tool, Umbicut:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-203.htm


Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration of no drugs, water births and the No clamping afterwards, the Lotus Birth.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-314.htm


Safety of no drugged births, warm water births, and no clamping or cutting of the cord, and I recommend no injection or taking of blood samples from the umbilical vein, or the heel of the child.  Well children do not need genetic testing, PKU testings, or injections into their tiny body.  Photos of the Lotus birth are available at

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-324.htm


What doctors do, before the woman is even 40 weeks pregnant:

Inductions.  Often they distress the child, and lead to episiotomy and /or c-sections, the c=sections increased to 25 percent, and doctors organizing to increase them even more so.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-126.htm


References and source information researched, with comments:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

    These references and source information I have found interesting.  There is more yet to be listed.   I seek to press for criminal medical negligence on the interruption of the infant's umbilical cord, the lifeline, the hope line.  My intent is for an International charge against 100 Nations involved in deceptive care and treatment to the pregnant lady and to her baby or babies.  The current trend for blood is science and research, likely a Big Business, scam too.  The evidence of fact of stem cells, from each perfected type of cell, not just blood stem cells, is yet to be heard in a court of law...as a fact they are a cure to any disease.  If true, each persons makes these and healthy ones can be found in our bodies.  The motive of exploiting the mother to take her baby's blood, is likely and concealed by politicians, who had the best chance to know this was going on, is likely in the harvesting of placenta blood taken from each child.  If a million persons tell a lie, it is still a lie.  


    The police are presently not educated on this matter, but need not be.  The duty of the police, paid by the tax payers, is to protected all equally.  The police only need to check out the current trends, and to check the false policies and training and the harvesting of babies, acknowledge by the AAP, and with senior doctors, such as Dr. George M. Morley.


Are Medical Services Safe:  Canadian Press and New York Times :

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-191.htm


Champion of Survival of the Fittest, acknowledges Cord Clamping Ethics, since 1801, Dr. Erasmus Darwin

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-202.htm


All Babies, including premature and c-section babies can have no clamping off their umbilical cords, Dr. T. Peltonen

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-225.htm


Brain Lesions, caused by drugs given the birthing mother, and followed with hasty umbilical cord clamping,

B. Windle, 1960's shared to the public in the 1970's, in The Magical Child, pages 48-50, Chapter Time bomb, Joseph Chilton Pearce

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-204.htm


Herbs, Red Leaf Tea vs Oxytocin, Pitocin to induce faster and easier labor

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-255.htm


Candian and American Doctors are being charged with criminal medical Common Nuisance and causing Bodily Harm.  Rule of Law means no person, even by dignity of a professional group, means the Statutory (Federal) Canadian Criminal Code and Constitution, must be used, and with the Evidence Act for gathering information or for investigation.  Not even doctors can perform or remain silent on keeping the public confidence from protection to the individual in all medical services. Duty requires warnings given in a timely fashion.  Corporations and Societies, were equally charged, and American and Canadian Doctors who failed to warn.

Krever Report, The Canadian Blood Supply :http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-237.htm

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/krever/


Doctors Charged :     www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-194.htm


Montreal , Canada Harvest Babies for Placenta Blood

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-220.htm


Did a possible Medical Malpractice Cover-up, put a father in jail for iatrogenic caused injuries?  His child was early clamped, a 5-week premature baby, then the child given 6 vaccinations,all on the same day, at two months of age?  Was the placenta harvested, for the 5-week premature baby's stem cells? The facts are that premature babies have more stem cells, according to Judith S. Mercer, then a full term baby.  And, then two months later, the body of the child was harvested too.  The deceased child's parents were of the Russian and Italian ancestry. Were the baby's stem cells from this marital combination sought after for stem cell blood cells?  The father was put in jail for Shaken Baby Syndrome, SBS.  Is he the guilty person?  Or, are the doctors and complications of many vaccinations given to an anemic child, the cause of the child's death.  In that case it is still not a natural death, but a homicide?  The cover-up, if any, would be likely using diseased organs in the organ banks,  the blood banks and in the stem cell banks. Would it not be easier to allege child assault, then to admit a diseased baby's blood and organs were used for another child's needs, or an adult's stem cell transplant?  Or, diseased cells used in cultivating more specific stem cells, from the brain, heart and so forth?  To expose this would be to suggest that the stem cells are diseased, and may be a factor as they were first cultivated in mouse jellies.  Well, mice and men do share the same chromosome count, and not the monkeys.  Makes you wonder, are we man or mouse, eh?  Has science made monkeys out of us? Monkeys like to laugh and play and take nothing too seriously.   See the Yurko Project

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-248.htm


Candian Civil Suits for medically caused compromised children, Chow and Ing case law, Ontario Canada: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-327.htm


Common Nuisance:  Would teaching others to do a false practice, and unnecessary, in most instances and harmful to most mothers and their babies,  breach this criminal code of Canada, Section #180?:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-195.htm


Criminal Code of Canada, #219, a reckless disregard to another person, Section #219

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-355.htm


Criminal Code of Canada, #215-229, Bodily Harm

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-196.htm


Criminal Code of Canada, #218, Exposing a Child to danger.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-350.htm


Harvesting babies for placenta blood, unethical claims AAP by policy 1999

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-425.htm


Harvesting of the Placentas, when they were deemed to be empty, "after delayed cord clamping, all pulsation had ceased before clamping.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-250.htm   and www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-333.htm


Task Force ACOG, denies causes of damaged children to medical malpractice. (like could they say anything differently?

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-326.htm


Unskilled Fathers in the Birth Room, cannot protect their babies or the mother from harm.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-370.htm


Declaration of Human Rights, since 1948 to present.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-144.htm


C-Section births can have no umbilical cord clamping, at all, T. Peltonen

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-225.htm


Informed Choice on child birth decisions:  Dublin, Ireland; London, UK; and British Columbia, Canada:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-443.htm


The Magical Child and Brain Lesions by drugs and Early Umbilical Cord Clamping, B. Windle, and Joseph C. Pearce:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-204.htm


Apgar Scores were brought in to test one drug over another, which drugs impaired the babies more noticeably:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-429.htm


Autism costs BC, Canada $60,000 annually, per child, about $4 to $8 million per victim.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-229.htm


Autism Class Action Granted in Canada, David Klein

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-253.htm


Autism costs Ontario, Canada, $100 Million

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-176.htm  


Medical Journalist speaks out on hasty umbilical cord clamping, causing Schizophrenia, among other disorders, Cory Mermer

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-417.htm


Cause of Autism related to hasty clamping

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-163.htm


Blood-letting of compromised babies, every 2nd and 3rd day, from 10 to 15 percent total blood volume, following hasty clamping.  This suggests harvesting for more stem cells.  If the child dies the Coroners, across Canada, or the States do not investigate.  Why Not?

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-192.htm


Neonates, newborn babies harvested in Australia's Children's Hospital

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-444.htm


Neonates, newborn babies harvested in Catania, Italy

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-439.htm


Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping is that 30-seconds or waiting for the placenta to cease to pulsate?

Research of Judith S. Mercer was required to be only 30-second clamping.  Were the mother's given informed choices for no clamping, at all?

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-441.htm


Human Stem Cell Images, see the value in the blood that belongs to the newborn child for their equal chance for well-being. and what ancient and current laws protects the child:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-445.htm


One in Sixteen babies, compromised:  They are likely victims of hasty umbilical cord clamping, are revived babies.

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-193.htm


Emergency Natural Birth and should an hospital birth be any different?  This even a Teenager could do on her own with a trusted friend:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-218.htm


Midwives did know about the risk of hasty umbilical cord clamping, Myles Midwife textbook

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-191.htm


Oxytocin, Pitocin, Syntocinon Dangers:


www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbith-190.htm


www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbith-190.htm


Hole in the Heart and Advantages of Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping,

     reference to Dr. Mavis Gunther, and Dr. George M. Morley:

http://www.123babybirth.com/doc/MapJune1-222.htm


Has experiments on babies to see if they will all live at only  30-second clamping come the standard of care?

Judith S. Mercer was required to do such an experiment, not informing the women of no clamping, at all, being their babies right to full placenta blood transfusion.  See some of Judith's other comments at

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2203Lotusbirth-441.htm


Taking Stem Cells from Babies in order to give to an adult, Catania, Italy.

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2203Lotusbirth-439.htm


Dr. Northrup supports that women not to birth their babies in the supine position, flat on the back or semi-sitting:

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2203Lotusbirth-442.htm


Oath of Hippocrates

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-446.htm


Enzymes, the importance of them and all components and elements of whole blood:

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-447.htm


Informed Consent:

http://www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-424.htm


Mortality of Infants in the USA, ranks 28th one of the highest for a developed Nation.

Is this because of hasty umbilical cord clamping and drugs during birth, and bad birth positions?

http://www.lotusbirth.com/docFEB2003Lotusbirth-443-htm


WHY  I  USED THE  OLDER BOOKS IN MY RESEARCH?

  • Source of information for the fetal circulation diagram, gives evidence of factual information, and how long logic was known, to all medical associations, societies, and colleges, and hospitals.  Thus, giving no good excuse for a professional medical persons endangering the  mother or the child.

  • Appropriate care forms signed at most hospitals and birth centers are not informed choice of all risk told and in appropriate time for the mother to be able to think the decision through or have means to independent research.  

  • Truth does not change with time, nor facts of science, nor good medical practice.  And, good ethics or law  upholds the truth in order that no injustice shall go unopposed.


World Book, Vol. B (Blood)  and Vol. H (Heart) (Vol S-Sn, (Serotonin),  and Dictionary 1979


You and Your Health,Volume One, Two, and Three, Harold Shryrock, M.A., M.D., and Mervyn G. Hardinge, M.D., Dr. Ph.H., Ph.D., Pacific Press Publishing Association, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, ISBN 0-8163-0533-1, (1985).

_______


Permission to use the above when references and credits are given to researcher, a mother and grandmother, Donna Young


Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth.  Search Lotusbirth


(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect the public on medical policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies, and colleges did not live up to no form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind.  It is believed they had a duty to have a policy of equal protection and security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.


contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home:   www.lotusbirth.com

References of research:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com