Serotonin not Oxytocin heals blood vessels: It is now alleged a mood gene.

Serotonin vs Oxytocin. Why oh why does not the World Health Organizztion (WHO) protect us? by Donna Young

It seems serotonin works with a special gene for our own happiness, to quote:

THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS ON THE ABOVE NEWS RELEASE SEROTONIN BY DONNA YOUNG

Oyxtocin has questionable and harmful ingredients in it, such as Chlorobutanol.  That ingredient is known to cause the mother's blood pressure to drop as the heart contractions are interrupted.

 If man can make this happy Substance, Serotonin . . .watch out. . . it is sure to be then harmful, too. I give a link below on the latest news release from the New York Times on Serotonin's benefits.

Serotonin is the true benefactor to the woman who has just given birth. It substances that works with the platelets to do the real stopping of bleeding after childbirth.

Why avoid Oxytocins?  Well, they are man-made, that is a good reason to avoid them.  They cause the child to be oxygenated blood deprived, anemic and jaundiced. This is because Oxytocin are already identified by the World Health Organization of causing brain damage to the infant. The cure is the anemia, jaundiced condition by low blood volume, because the World Health Organizations' experts directed immediate cord clamping on the child's lifeline, the umbilical cord.

Of course, they did not admit the deprived placenta blood, after this amputation of a perfectly functioning organ, weakens the child, even to cause its death. The placenta blood was intended to go into the child's body for the needs of his now expanding lungs, to do the gas exchanges. There will be insufficiency of volume and blood to circulate for the child's optimal health. He she, if they live, will be a struggling child to replace that deprived blood volume.

The stealers of the placenta blood, and they conceal how much was deprived, the nurses accessories to the crime, saying nothing and putting nothing down on the child's medical charts are thieves. They have actually stolen the blood, or wasted it.  The medical person (s) did this without informed consent, in most instances.  They are conspirators, in collusion with other medical organizations and societies working not with informed consent to the consumer of medical services, but contrary to their best interests.  Medical associtions were formed to progtect the public best interest, to do no harm.

When the placenta was more or less expropriated by the medical societies as their property was they comsmetically removed it from the child /and owner of the placenta and the blood in it.   The removal was done in most instances, with the approval and allowance by those governing the Administration of the Hospital, where the offense took place under the disguises of policies, medical policies, were set outside of Rule of Law,  and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, so often the courts needed to be used to have those rights upheld.  The medical persons violated informed choice rights and for the woman to be a self-determinator of what was done or not done to her body, or her baby.

Clamping off the placenta cord, must be deemed a criminal assault.  Policies cannot allow any medical person to do proectures without informed choice.  

WOMEN NOT AWARE OF THE DISRESPECT SHOWN TO THEM BY OTHER MEDICAL PERSONS:

After the nuisance of the baby is removed from the placenta, not of value, the placenta blood worth more then gold is being drained.  Some of have heard the snickers that the woman, whose trust is being breached, is a dumb bunny as her baby's blood of up to 50 percent is being drained from the warmed placenta in her birth canal.  The hospital or the medical persons or the lab will get the benefits of the blood that will be separated in components of blood, worth more than the life of the mother or the child, put together.

Many women after one birth experience felt raped, not in control.  They had not options.  They were given their babies and said go home and look after them, and get over the treatment we gave you to have a "living" child. Police would not investigate medical assault and battery if the victims walk away from the hospitals.  After the experience of "active management" a business control of the mother's body of drugs, cutting, using instruments on the child, neither the woman or the child were well after the care and treatment imposed on them.  This was all organized by organized persons involved in only "active management" not allowing "natural birth" to happen, leaving the woman to birth in a rented room, with a bath, and to birth without interference or interruptions.   This is what the Western Society's pioneers enjoyed, natural births, in their own homes.  They did not always remove the placenta by cosmetic amputation. Some tied it off after the palcetna was birthed and all pulsation ceased, and cut it with boiled scissors and a tad of iodine used.

HEAVY ARTILLERY BIRTHS VS NATURAL BIRTHS:  Which do YOU choose?:

What the many pioneers enjoyed, too, were warm water births that allowed the birthing mother to "catch" her own  baby. The doctor or the midwife were only there to catch his/her fee for services, if they arrived on time.  Mother and father did just fine, without medical persons, or their family present.  Mother birthed in this warm water environment of softness. The logic and benefits were there was no cold air to stop the pulsating cord from doing its job, with the child's heart, the beat in the cord,  to transfuse the blood from the placenta to the now expanding lungs.

In these unassisted home births, the mother catching her own baby bonded immediately. The mother, wisely, did not clamp or tie off the cord, of the pulsating cord with yet the baby's organ, the placenta, yet inside her body.  When the baby got all the blood from the placenta into his/her now functioning lungs, the baby was a healthy pink baby, a blue ribbon baby, to be exact.  

These healthy babies, like my living parents, of born unassisted on the farm, ages 89 and 90.  They had no heavy artillery used to bring them into this world:  high operating tables, no shaving of the mother, no cutting of her, no drugs, no forceps tools, no needles for stitching, no vacuums, no need for incubators, ...they genuinely survived true natural birth.  

The benefit of their natural births were the babies got to keep all their hormones and enzymes in their placenta blood, now in their growing bodies.  They had all their natural immunities to deal with the virus of their and even to our times.

I am not saying modern medicine does not contribute to our well-being.  But, it must be carefully monitored and have checks and balances as the policies to use it, do not take over informed choice and to be able to reject it, as the right of the person ruling over their own bodies, and the care of their babies, as long as best interest for mother and child are the priorities, neither exploited or needlessly, endangered.  

TODAY THERE IS NO REAL RESPECT TO THE MOTHER

    WHO IS BIRTHING IN CONTROLLED BIRTH ENVIRONMENTS:

How the medical persons have snickered, as to the helpless lady on her back, as they have cut away her baby from its organ, the placenta.  Now, they draining away the deprived baby's warm-blood trapped in the placenta. They are milking the placenta as though the woman is a cow, providing not warm milk, but easy flowing warm blood. It is disgusting as to the breach of trust to a good majority of woman, world wide.

See Stem cell, July 2003, this web site.

This was happening as there was fire drill, to carry away the gasping child, as though it were a natural occurrence not to have sufficiency of blood and oxygen in his /her veins. The nurses can be seen scurrying, as they are laughed at too, as to this arbitrable ritual, as they carry away baby to revive it with artificial 100 percent oxygen, and to top the baby's blood up with artificial blood (lacking hormones and natural enzymes and nutrients) Ringers Lactate.

The weakened babies now need test tube feedings and external man-given 100 percent oxygen. The babies have to now live in a special moisturized tent.   They will need minute by minute observation and supervision. They will be risked to be further weakened by inadequately trained medical persons, could be students, taking every 2nd and 3rd day, 10 to 15 percent total blood volume.  This is blood-letting as the baby tried in vain to replace the stem cell blood and volume of blood deprived by the wielder of a clamp.

Following drugging of the mother. The baby's quality blood is whisked away, now to be separated for the value of its worth, more precious than gold; and more precious to the life of the child, or his/her quality of life. And we are not calling "active management" with these rituals criminal assault and battery.  It has not intentions or design or plans to do this.  

It is all intentional and it is all planned and by policies that overrule informed consent to a natural birth, like the Western Pioneers, had the emancipation of their times to enjoy natural births, and no meddling. It was only with meddling of the cutting of their bodies by both men and women, that led to their deaths, and giving them questionable molds in trying to hurrying on labor, unnaturally.  

Reactions to molds (penicillin is made from molds) in teas and concoctions and cutting and unsterilized knives and means of stitching brought the deaths whether it was a service by man or woman, or by doctor, nurse, or midwife, or witch.  The witch of history was a person that studied nature and design and nutrients of foods and herbs.  Man and woman began with natural desires to learn from nature, and to name, and to be its caretakers.  

Please order the book from your library on women's studies, a 50 page booklet, Witches, Midwives, and Nurses. . . the medical care came to us, in that order.  Women were always Inquiring into life, they being, themselves, creators of life, giving birth. Man seemed to want part of the action, too, I guess, not left out of birth.  They were always present in home births.

 Only controlled hospital kicked them out of the birth room, in the 1920's, and they were not allowed into the birth rooms, until the mid 1960's, but both men and women were uneducated on childbirth, and had no knowledge of their legal rights of a signed birth contract, to force them to deal with the actual birth and care of the child, on the no clamping of the umbilical cord, and taking home the child's placenta, to bury in their garden.  This to be a security of the genetic codes not taken by unauthorized persons doing experiments on human genetics.  

Man, taking over birth, and I say that as to their being discriminatory to women, have gone to far as a business men, involved  in active management: drugs, tools, and cutting all deal with birth in time efficiency.  Birth is natural and women are best to birth where they are the most relaxed and in control of the situation and their bodies.  

That is a home birth with witness to help the mother, as she may call on their skills.  Birth is natural, requiring no hands on the mother if she births in warm water.  And, only in the severest of emergency, are other skills needed. When needed, they are gratefully received as appropriate for that specific need.  Such skills are not necessary in most child birth, 95 percent of the times.

WHO IS PAYING FOR THIS TREATMENT TO THE WOMAN AND THE CHILD:

    GOVERNMENTS AND THEIR APPROVED MEDICAL PLANS

This research in blood components, stem cells, they call, portions of our blood and cells from the organs taken, are alleged to cure us, so they justify, weaken us at birth, to give us a hopeful cure, sometime in the future, as we need it, as the latent disorders surface, by insufficiency of blood and injected viruses on needles stuck to us at the moment of birth, in many cases. I ask, is there no justice on the heads of the government? Can we not do something about justices so far unopposed?

After the World Health Organization, in 1998, directed immediate cord clamping along comes Dupont, the savior of mankind, who created a clamping and cutting tool, with a shield to protect the would-be blood stealers, the medical persons with the government license, from blood splattering. This is as the now drain the cut placenta vein into 250 ccs plastic bags, to be sent to the highest payer of placenta blood, for stem cell research and extracting of all the substances of blood, white cells, red cells, stem cells, platelets, and the hormones and enzymes of the blood and vitamins and minerals that were created for the needs of the baby, and none other.

W.H.O. is not a respecter of informed or signed birth contracts to birth women. I do not see them uphold the Declaration of benevolent care to all children, nor a respecter of no form of discrimination to women. They are encouraging by lack of proper directives and are in support of drug companies and interventions imposed on women, and they are not protectors of women and children, but of the Big Business Corporations.

W.H.O. is politically inspired and paid for.  They do not represent individuals by any vote.  They seem to be stopping individual rights of informed consent on medical research and taking of organs and blood from our bodies without informed consent.  When violations of those natural rights, they have no committee to assist those so violated of human rights.  If they are so powerful, where is that power to protect, eh? And internationally?  One complaint of uninformed consent, any where in the world, should bring their protection.  That has not happened, as yet.

Is W.H.O. on the side of informed choice and self-determination on medical matters, where do they stand and on natural child birth, to be that, no hands on by a signed birth contract.  No drugs, no cutting, no cord clamping or cosmetic removal, which the parents can learn to do, if they sign they are risking invasion of germs in a cut cord:  tetanus for one.  

W.H.O. is not helping but may be contributing to leading women astray by not giving forms of signed birth contracts for natural birth. W.H.O. have, in their own way, promoted, "active management" on all women, and this is followed with hasty clamping, and taking the baby's deprived blood without consent and used in research, the collectors paid for, by someone.  This world wide directive is conning women, to this day, to submit passively, without questioning the medical services to be imposed on them, and the child soon to be born.  

W.H.O. IF THEY WERE A PROTECTIVE AGENCY TO THE INDIVIDUAL AND HAVE NOT MET THAT MANDATE,

    W.H.O. SHOULD NOT BE SUPPORTED BY TAXPAYER'S DOLLARS IF THEY ONLY REPRESENT BIG BUSINESS, AS I SEE IT:

All Nations should stop their contributions to the World Health Organization, we do not meet their directors, nor know their qualifications or interests in big corporations and shares in drug companies, and by what bias they do give out information.

If the are not telling the women about their legal rights to dissent from "active management" and to have unassisted births, with their own approved birth witness, they are not dealing at arm's length with birth being natural and not a medical disorder requiring help of any kind, but that which the mother logically knows requires an expert care for a known condition.

Births, again, it is worth repeating, are natural in 95 percent of all pregnancies. Baby knows where he/she is, and knows how to get out of the mothers body, by using her hormones, like the now peace of mind substance, Serotonin, and natural produced in the body, Oxytocin, and Relaxin, to cause her expansion of the vagina, and the pelvic bones, for her to birth her baby, in most cases head first, face down, in the majority of cases.

When the baby is not positioned correctly and is in the birth canal, it has been caused this disorder by man's interference and experimentation on this woman, not educated, leading to many of the cutting of her body, to give her a child, now likely compromised and impaired, the rest of the child's life, and the woman is weakened as well.

Serotonin, has long been known for its benefits by the medical persons involved in child birth: WB Dictionary p 1903 states:
serotonin n. a substance in the blood that causes blood vessels to constrict and aids in blood clotting; hydrooxytriptamine. It is an indole, chemically related to adrenalin and hallucinogenic drugs, that also occurs in the brain and in smooth muscles of the intestines and functions in brain chemistry. Formula:C10 H12 N2 0 (note blood substances can be chemicals and they are often referred to as hormones or enzymes or proteins).

Whereas:
Oxytocin, ibid, p 1490, is a hormone of the pituitary gland effecting contraction of the uterus in childbirth and stimulating lactation. Formula: C43 H66 N 12 012 S2.

In Active Management the women are being manipulated by the use of drugs by the medical persons, and their is not real sincere medical person if they are carrying drugs or tools, because they intend to use those skills and impose them, and not with prior information, of that intent, long before the baby's birth. They take over, and control the woman's body and birth process, this is male and females, that carry a license to do what many call endangering meddling of natural child birth. Here is how they use drugs to manipulate the woman's birth, so it is harmful:

oxytocic (ok si to sik, tos ik) adj. n. --adj. hastening childbirth, especially by stimulating the contraction of the uterine muscles. n. a oxytocic drug or medicine.
oxytocin (ok si to sin. n. a hormone of the pituitary gland effecting contraction of the uterus in childbirth and stimulating lactation.

    Oxytocins are abortion drugs when used by man on a pregnant lady.  Even nose sprays with oxytocin may cause a miscarriage.  
__________________________

Please give credits, if I have inspired you.  Please share my research and those of others with others.  

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

comments to Donna