UNSKILLED FATHERS AND BIRTH WITNESSES IN THE DELIVERY ROOM & BIRTH PLANS
Many birth witness of a mother's birth of her child are not educated or skilled in child birth. The thoughts of Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother.
If the fathers had time or were prepared for child birth by biology studies of correct information on
natural child birth, they would be
supportive of natural birth and be prepared to protect their wives for such an adventure. That includes
information on the care and
treatment to the child during and after birth, whether breathing or not breathing and the management
of care and treatment of the
child's lifeline, the umbilical cord.
If the father and mother are not adequately trained in the actual birth of their child, neither know
to report reckless or endangering
practices done to the mother during the labor and delivery of their offspring and that many babies are caused
to be weaker by
immediate and early cord clamping.
Jaundice in Infants, the Neonate is Caused by Early Umbilical Cord Clamping, caused by insufficiency
of Blood:
The baby will have insufficiency of blood volume and pressure when the medical person (s), have clamped a still pulsating umbilical cord. It is witnessed that umbilical cords, if left alone, and the child birthed in warm water, or a warm room, or wrapped in a warm towel, will pulsate, documented to be 12 minutes or more, even up to 20 minutes. Therefore, the jaundice will become the evidence of that fact, of blood volume deprivation, particularly of babies clamped within seconds of birth. This jaundice is likely to show up a day or so later.
The reason the child may be jaundiced for 2 weeks, or longer is because the child will have to replace
the blood volume deprived
him or her at birth. This is logical. It takes a 9-pound baby to make 10 ounces of total
blood volume, in the 9 month gestation
period. They can be endangered of deprivation from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume if early
clamped.
When medical persons and stem cell blood banks refer to only taking the "cord" blood, implying
wrongfully a tad of blood, they
are misrepresenting the facts from 4 to 6 ounces deprived many children, at birth. What they are
referring to as "cord blood" is
blood drained from the cut vein of the placenta. The blood was wrongfully trapped in the placenta
by a medical person (s) not
adequately trained or willfully negligent on the fetus to neonate circulation system. Changes
of trends of teaching of all medical
persons, from doulas to surgeons must be a priority of our governments if our babies are to be able
to be born equal, anywhere,
as blue ribbon babies.
The opinion that jaundice is a factor of early umbilical cord clamping can be confirmed by Dr. George
M. Morley, a retired
obstetrician and gynecologists who writes articles at:
www.cordclamping.com
.
The basic facts of science and knowledge is you do not allow the medical doctor or medical person (s)
to clamp the cord. No
clamping is wise in a signed birth "contract." The decrease in red cells will cause
the iron to remain in the baby's system. The
child will logically have low volume of blood to deal with it, the iron in his her system. The
child's skin color will indicate the iron
red-pigmentation. And jaundice not a disease but a symptom of a blood disorder will be the child's
bronzed skin. This is likely to
continue for two weeks or more until the child can remake the deprived blood. The child may remain
in a vulnerable situation until
6 weeks or 6 months.
This hasty umbilical cord clamping is NOT excusable for any medical person to do. And, the only reasons
to do that are
emergency situations if the child's umbilical cord tore or for placenta previa. Then the child
must be quickly assisted to have their
deprived blood from "their" blood source, the placenta, given back quickly to them. Otherwise,
others get the benefit of that whole
blood and the child gets a synthetic blood expander, likely, Ringer's Lactate.
The medical person and up to third parties, those that trained them, must be taken before a proper hearing,
and likely criminal
charges should take place, after the official hearing, to include the trainers, or authors of medical
teaching textbooks, or the
person that did the actual interference of the child's circulation system by failing to perceive endangering
to the child by the
interruption of their lifeline. All have a duty to the child not to endanger during or after birth.
PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN MISLEADING INFORMATION
OR WITHHOLDING FROM THE PUBLIC:
The duty to protect the public for adequately and competently trained medical persons are to the organization or association that licensed them, some of these are: The Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons, expert groups, of Obstetricians, Gynecologists, Pediatricians, Professional Nurses Associations, Doulas, Ambulance Medics, Practical Nurses, Midwives, and the various levels of Ministries of Health, both Federal and Provincial. In some instances, where lab and blood technicians are involved in receiving the placentas for blood training, they must be investigated for concealing from the child's own medical chart how much blood was drained from each baby's placenta, after hasty clamping.
And where the blood and placenta went as to being alleged discarded. Did that mean burning or
was it packaged and sent to
other organizations, private and public, such as drug research labs, science research labs, and cosmetic
companies? If so, the
dealing in the use of organs and blood for human benefit is a violation of faith to some person's faith. To have done that with their
baby's organ and blood without informed consent, constitutes breach of trust. It is a breach of
trust of medical services between
contracts of the medical services and the government not having checks and balances on self-governing
medical groups. All
are to be governed by the Drug and Food authorities, per each country.
Other professionals involved in withhold information or reporting false information are the biology
professionals, who write the
biology textbooks. Often opinions of the biology teaches are in the books without adequate reference
to a medical research of a
medical group or doctor of their conclusions in telling students, it is okay for a common practices
to do immediate cord clamping
on most babies. They have not adequately stated the importance of the placenta and the transfusion
of blood from it to the child's
now expanding lungs.
There is another group organized and self-governing, and this is the Law Society groups, and
their licensing and training of the
ministers of our justice systems, the lawyers and the judges. They have a duty to assist any individual
or group that have been
exploited or endangered by another group and they have a duty as to the principles of justice, that
no injustice goes unopposed.
OATHS MUST BE TAKEN BY THOSE WHO SERVE THE PUBLIC:
Not only is it in the oath of the doctors, or past oath, do no harm, that is an implied duty to all adults, one to another and our duty to the child and animals and all that dwell on this one home, Planet Earth. Lawyers, Doctors, Judges, and Politicians do take oaths and so do the police.
Some of the lawyers, women and men, have not assisted on this issue, may be because it smacks of criminal
medical
malpractice. Others have remained in shock as many of the public now getting informed by means
of the communication open
on the internet.
MAJOR NEWS MEDIAS HAVE SILENCED INFORMATION
ON THE TIMING OF THE CLAMPING OF THE CHILD'S UMBILICAL CORD:
This issue of violation of the child, at birth, has been silenced by the major news medias, the press,
radio, and tv. These major
news media are part of the major big business corporations, and are owned as chains, and have supported
the interest of big
business in medical research and have promoted stem cells taken from babies as a good thing. The Rich
do own shares in
private medical research, including stem cell research clinics.
FAILURE TO PROTECT THE CHILD:
These major news medias did not reasonably think that the baby had a legal right to equal protection and security of person, implied in all countries' Constitutions, and International Declarations. Many countries, taking part in such International Declaration to women and children, required each level of the governments' services to the public, for their protection had their own Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Duty was that there would be no discrimination as to age, sex, race, color, faith, or mental or physical disadvantages.
We have International organizations in both Medicine and Science Research that speak in principles on
the duty of science not
taking any organ or blood or tissue for experiments without informed consent. That has not happened
on this issue of the
placenta and the baby's blood trapped in it.
Serious breaches of trust have happened, and world wide. This is a serious situation and
must not be dealt with lightly or
discarded.
Many Christian groups have ignored this and I wonder why? Perhaps, they are in shock as well. But, we cannot wait for an ah,
ha, we just discovered this. Not so!. The evidence is overwhelming in the past to the
present, that the medical persons did
know, or ought to have known. They had the best chance and means to access to past research, and
ought to have done that,
and sought more then one opinion of a trainer or textbook. They had the best chance to video the hasty
clamping but that would
reveal on evidence tape of fact, a compromised child, by medical intervention and such are not available
or made available so
far to the courts, or the public.
Pardons in Advance:
While Pardons in Advance have been suggested, that requires an apology, for wrong doing. This may be for personal involvement. If we have professional groups involved and covering-up one another, then we may have pride of a professional person or organized group. This may be preventing correction of false or misleading research, inadequate as to what information was left out.
None of us are perfect. But, if a professional group is being spared of embarrassment, or
saving face, it at the expense of the
victimized children who faced life with more difficulties when life was already difficult. Saving
face may be the reason they are not
going public of false medical practices. If so, then correction of false practices, and teaching
and lack of right information will
continue, another two hundred years. Today, the present, is the time to deal with secrecy and falsehood
in medical sciences.
Such collections of stem cells at each stem cell blood banks, must have some kind of record how it got
there, and who was paid.
There are over 2,000 midwives and doctors registered as such blood banks. How many had informed
consent to send in the
child's placenta blood. What are the facts. They can be found out through the Evidence Act.
Excuses can be discovered in proper hearings, as to facts of need to interrupt a child's circulation
system:
There are many excuses, but they are that, excuses and outside of facts of medicine and science, and violated the child's rights to full transfusion of blood from the placenta, which was intended to go into the lungs, for the child to now do the gas exchanges. That is through adequate volume and pressure of blood in the lungs to do that oxygen and carbon dioxide exchanges. This is all logical.
Weakness to any creature, animal or human, can be demonstrated in a court though animals studies and
on videos permitted
done on human babies who were immediately or hastily clamped during a c-section birth or a vaginal birth. This would be for a
full term baby or a premature baby.
All such babies early clamped were, by evidence of fact, violated babies, even though they did live,
and looked apparently,
physically, okay. The internal injuries are often latent in their appearance and awareness. Muscle
weaknesses, learning
disabilities and behavior of so many children, are delayed in observation and in testing. Holes
in the heart are common evidence
of hasty clamping, too. Anemia is the common problem of our youth to day. It is not logical
in well fed Western Societies. We
can investigate the baby's birth records. It will require either the willing cooperation of the parents,
or an Order of the Court for the
police to use the Evidence Act for any child now sick, or babies that died within two years of their
birth by what was considered a
disease, not an accident.
ANIMALS GET MORE PROTECTION THEN DO THE HUMAN BABIES:
An animal is more protected to get full blood transfusion, at birth, because they would be noticed weak by hasty clamping. The evidence of their weakness would be they could not stand to nurse. That is not observable in human babies, who cannot even roll over at birth, and many are then, after early clamping, too weak to nurse adequately. These weaker babies, with low amounts of oxygen blood getting to their brains, can be prone to crib deaths. The human baby is then more likely to be endangered, therefore, then animals. Generally, vets are required a greater duty of care to an animal then what human doctors are treating the human babies. Why is that? While most doctors, in the past, were ethically and competently trained, that does not seem to be the situation today. Their is apparent motive. It is the trend to take the placenta blood to use it in stem cell research, science, and drugs, and in cosmetics.
FEDERAL GRANTS ARE USED FOR USING THE NEONATES BLOOD AND ORGAN:
That research is paid for by grants at the Federal levels. None of the politicians or advisors to the government, Provincial or Federal, have protected the newborn citizen from being endangered to have "their" blood taken for this stem cell research. Babies are knowingly being deprived from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, from 20 ccs to 200 ccs, and collection bags are for 250 ccs. That is from 4 ounces to 6 ounces and more blood taken, from, for an example a 9-pound baby who only made in the 9-month gestation period, a total blood volume of 10 ounces of blood, or 248 ccs, approximately.
THE PUBLIC IS IN SHOCK:
This is shocking information to the public at large, but it is true information. The reasons many babies, now one in sixteen, (Canadian reference see list of reference, last on the list in contents), are having to be revived with both oxygen and blood expanders and transfusions. This, of course, is at considerable higher medical fees and services, and repeat medical care attention to such endangered children. The parents are none the wiser. Early clamping was taught in many of the biology textbooks they used in school and in advanced and continuing education.
COST TO SOCIETY FOR SICK CHILDREN:
The sicknesses in babies is not being disclosed factually to the public, and the increase of it. So Discoveries and using the Evidence Act of cost of medical care and to which age groups and why, must be the duty of all countries and to review all birth of the sick babies, with internal disorders, and not those caused by accidents. It costs society some $4 million to educate and assist an autistic child that will not live as comfortable a life as a child not compromised at birth (Search for Chow and Ing Case Law, Sommers and Roth, Ontario Canada). Or, a child impaired by the probability of a live virus vaccination, imposed on the child, while the child was yet anemic, at birth, or a few months later (See Yurko Project).
Professional Women most vulnerable to medical error in child birth:
Through my research, I have found the most vulnerable of women are the career women, particularly, professional women, even lawyers and doctors, and registered-nurses, and practical nurses. This is believed because, as a professional, they do not question another professional, as to their belief they are, like themselves, believed competently, trained.
It is almost considered impolite to question a professional and their training on in this instance,
this issue, or get second
opinions, and that may be to their own peril. Also, these professional ladies, like many of us,
we are all busy, are busy as career
persons. They do not have the time or the energy to investigate, or surf the net.
Much of Western Society has been trained to trust blindly the professionals and not question them when
we should be having
checks and balances. It is long over due to seek an Official Inquiry on Maternity Matters and
the Care and Treatment of the
Development from the Embryo Stages to the Neonate, the newborn citizen.
Also, through our education from K to 12, and in continuing education, we have been exposed to false
and biased information
that had conflict of interest to drug corporations. This is evident in most biology textbooks
and many library reference books. It is
obvious that drug corporations assisted in writing policy for the medical professional to learn, and
most of that information, is
outside natural child birth.
Natural child birth, if allowed in medical institutions, consists of no hands-on-birth If
this was the training of most professionals,
attending a child's birth, it would dramatically cut the $20 billion dollars now budgeted for child
birth.
What is required in natural child birth, but three things: Patience, Patience, and Patience. Nature knows what it is doing. The
baby knows where it is and knows the birth canal. The baby is just like a cat that went up a tree,
they, generally, come down, on
their own, when good and ready and feel secure to come down. Babies know when to come, and to
be born, and seldom, do
they need our interventions, which at best, are guesses, only. There are rare cases when a scan
done on an overdue baby has
revealed a restriction of the mother's body, or the cord too many times around the neck preventing in
very rare cases the child's
natural delivery. But, generally, 93 to 95 percent of babies are born without complications, if
they have none of man's
interventions.
ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AS STANDARD PRACTICE MUST BE REVIEWED:
And the sad part, best practice possible is not in "active management" dealing with drugs,
cutting, restrained birth positions, and
hasty umbilical cord clamping. These interventions, including scanning the baby, unreasonably,
and too soon, and too often, are
not beneficial, in most instances.
The State of the Art medical technology must be approached with extreme caution and wisdom and right
of the mother to refuse
them by factually informed choice.
That has NOT been the experience of the last three and four generations, including my own birth experiences,
and that of my
mother's, and that of my daughter's, and my personal friends, now having their children give birth.
By what is still happening around us, it can predicted what will happen to uneducated women on child
birth delivery. She will, too,
make the same mistakes as their mothers.
Only our grandmothers, who birthed prior to about 1923, were truly emancipated to home births, unassisted,
warm water births,
and no clamping or cutting off their babies placenta and lifeline. Such innocence of unassisted
birth has never been taken away
from women in small third world countries. These are the women, who are not exposed to harmful Western
Societies costumes,
trends, traditions, habits, political objectives, and the concealed motives in the control of the care
of the women of these
societies.
A MOTHER'S TO-BE RIGHT TO INSIST ON A SIGNED BIRTH CONTRACT:
All Mothers-to-be, whether pregnant or not, have a common law right of individual self-preservation
and to protect their offspring,
can have a signed birth contract. This then brings out the medical persons training, and respect
to the mother's wishes, or their
lack of training and attitude and intent to impose a medical process the mother has a legal right to
refuse. Only the court can take
away a persons right to self-determination and control over what happens to them or their legal guardianship
over their children.
Hospital policies or policies of medical groups are not legal to take away another individual's freedom
and choice by informed
choice.
The contract for a birth will logically include a waiver to the medical persons suggestions if she rejects
that persons suggestions,
opinions, or directives. It will also include a Clause that the mother has a right to change
her mind at any time, during a birth
experience for care and treatment. The mother can, therefore, reject cutting of her body by means
of an episiotomy or a c-section. But, she can change her mind, at the point of time, she may think
it a logical option.
- Unless she changes her mind, the medical person are to assist her to deliver her baby by the freedom of movement and position of her choice; and no drugs that would interfere with the natural hormones that naturally widen her birth canal and the hormones that contract on her womb to assist in expelling the placenta.
- Hormones to enlarge the birth canal and work on the hip joints to expand them are the relaxins.
- Hormones for shutting down the womb, are natural oxytocin. The body does not include harmful preservatives, like chlorobutanol, mixed in synthetic oxytocins. Her natural hormones are released in her body, after the baby is out of womb, and the placenta blood has been transfused into the baby.
- When the baby is no longer drawing oxygen from the mother's blood stream, the placenta is no longer needed to be in the mother's system, and her hormones prepare the womb to be as she was, before conception.
- Oxytocin also works on the muscles in the mother's breast to assist in bringing the milk for the baby to now nurse, and receive about 5-natural sugars in the breast milk, essential for the child's brain and future development.
- The platelet and serotonin hormones are the hormones that seal up the blood vessels after the placenta is expelled and stop the bleeding. Normal bleeding in the expulsion of the placenta are normal, as is the monthly menstrual periods of the woman not pregnant. This process will soon start again.
- Warning: Mothers are deceived to accept oxytocin as a means to prevent bleeding. Or to use them and other forms to induce labor, prior to her natural body and the child's to bring on natural birth. Oxytocin, going by many names, is actually, when given in a artificial form, the cause of more bleeding. This is because it causes long harsh labor contractions of the muscles. As to the pain of them, the drug is often combined with morphines, concealing the damage being done by these harsher contractions that nature would not impose on the mother's body.
RIGHT TO A VIDEOED BIRTH AND WITH VOICE
ARE THE MOTHER'S LEGAL RIGHT TO HAVE
TO DOCUMENT THE BIRTH CARE AND TREATMENT:
All mothers have a legal right to a video of the child's entire birth and to have birth witnesses of
her choosing, and more than one,
whether they are paid professionals or members of her family. She is wise to select someone who
will remind the medical
person of the signed birth contract and report as a witness any thing that was of violation to the mother's
care and treatment and
that of her fetus, or the infant, at birth, called, now a neonate.
A child's birth witness, including some Doulas, is generally, the father of the child. But in
some cases grandmothers or friends,
are in the birth room. These birth witnesses are not generally trained to know of the parent's
legal rights in preventing
unnecessary and early umbilical cord clamping on the infant's lifeline/hopeline. Most reasons
for doing this procedure are
hoaxes. Lack of knowledge on this issue and unncessary procedure is true of the last three generations. They, too, were not
educated on this issue either, that no clamping or cutting of the cord is necessary unless the cord
tore or for a c-section where
there was a placenta previa and the doctor cut the cord by accident.
NO CLAMPING OF THE CORD WERE FACTS OF WISE PIONEERS
IN BOTH CANADA AND THE STATES IN HOMEBIRTHS:
For the past three generations, parents were not truthfully told that no clamping or cutting of the umbilical needs to be done. While many doctors did not participate in early cord clamping, it was because they knew it to be a medical hoax. The hoax of endangering the child was first written down by Dr. Erasmus Darwin, back in 1801. It has been debated within the medical circles since that time and it has been the last three generations for a variety of alleged reasons, many doctors were clamping the cord of selected children. His research was first revealed by the research of Dr. Mavis Gunther, 1957, UK:
"Another thing very injurious to the child, is the tying and cutting of the
navel string too soon; which should always be left till the child has not
only repeatedly breathed but till all pulsation in the cord ceases. As
otherwise the child is much weaker than it ought to be, a portion of the
blood being left in the placenta, which ought to have been in the child."
Erasmus Darwin, Zoonomia, 1801, Vol III, page 302.
Dr. E. Darwin, the Grandfather of Charles, when he said, "Another thing . . . " I wonder what more he was trying to tell us that
were harmful to women and the newborn child.
MOTIVES THAT CAN BE CONFIRMED BY THE EVIDENCE ACT:
It is now believed the early clamping was done to give the hospitals research blood, at no cost. The
placenta blood contained
stem cells for science experiments. The first experiments in stem cells began in England
and in the Middle East, in 1939. (see
blood history,
www.123-baby-birth.com
). The cutting of the cord is actually harmful because it is risking navel and blood
infections.
LACK OF FACTUAL BIRTH CARE RECORDED ON THE CHILD'S MEDICAL CHARTS:
ON THE UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING TIME AND THE CONDITION OF THE CORD WHEN CLAMPED:
The doctors never recorded on the child's own medical history record the timing of the clamping of the
cord, or the cord's
condition when clamped. For example, clamped instantly, the cord firm, red, and pulsating. Or,
Clamped twelve minutes after
birth, the cord white/ silver, limp and not pulsating, and the placenta expelled, and permission granted
to clamp the cord for
cosmetic removal.
That seems to be true for the ethical doctors who did wait for full pulsation to cease. That seems
to have been left off the medical
records by tradition, world wide. Very mysterious habit as all doctors are called to give detail
reports on such organs and care
and treatment.
PROBLEMS OF CHILD'S HEALTH AND LEARNING ARE LIKELY RELATED TO
HOW EARLY THE PULSATING CORD WAS CLAMPED:
Parents were none the wiser why some children in their families had problems in health and abilities and other children in the same family breezed through school and had perfect health. Many parents thought the difference in abilities was the genetic pool. Not so. Most children would have their potential genius intact, if the child had not been clamped early from the umbilical cord, while it was still pulsating.
As an example, I went to school with children born in homebirths in the Netherlands. The oldest children, the first born children, about four, all went on to university, except the last two children born in Canada. Were the differences in abilities caused in birth practices of full delayed clamping on the cord? I think so.
In the Netherlands, homebirths, like the Canadian Pioneers prior to 1923, seldom used drugs. The
home births were not rushed,
like they are in most hospitals. So for a well trained and competent midwife, their waiting for
the placenta to be expelled and all
pulsation ceased was normal and natural.
In American and Canadian hospitals, false practices came in. Even the midwives became impatient and
power-played on
making it their own decision what they would do to another's child. Perhaps, it was because
the placenta blood was secretly
wanted and needed for experiments on blood and the American's paid for blood. And drug companies
paid for the placenta.
If the hospital and research labs could get free 1/2 cup to 1 cup of blood from every child born, and
plenty were born during the
war years, that saved them money in fees for blood units.
Canada did not pay for blood, but what practices and policy were done in the States, Canadian medical
doctors were expected
to follow too, and most likely what Great Britain was doing, as well. The medical groups stick
together in their policies, trends,
habits, and customs.
In hospital births, time efficiency stopped the waiting up to twenty minutes for some baby's cords to
stop pulsating. So, the
doctors, as long as the child is breathing clamped the still pulsating cord. Some did it when
they began drugging the mothers
during birth. Perhaps they feared the toxicity of the drug was more dangerous then having the child
anemic.
Most children survive the assault and battery. The doctors conceal the amount of blood trapped
in the placenta. It may be later
drained by the lab of the hospital and used in research or sent to stem cell research. There is
evidence the placenta is sent for
profit to drug companies. This remains much of a secret, how long the hospitals and doctors have been
doing this until the
government permits an official Inquiry of what the doctors and hospitals were doing and why the public
was deceived and not
informed. Most governments are aware of trends of the doctors and their training or ought to be.
EARLY UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPED BABIES:
The consequences, of course, of any early clamped babies are anemic children. The child's blood will not be tested at the hospital where early clamping goes on. This would alert the parents of the reason of the child's low blood volume and anemic condition and that is concealed, unless it is so bad the child needs a transfusion.
Some parents will have better skills and means to nourish the child's weakened condition. These
children with means of better
nourished mothers, if the mother breast feed, will not be too impaired by this nutritional deficiency,
or that is hoped for. Those
parents with higher incomes and better means for added supplements to the impaired child may be able
to reduce other side
effects of insufficiency of hormones, enzymes, and nutrients essential for normal growth and sexual
development.
Best practice possible is, of course, better educated mothers and fathers who can prevent harm or endangering
and weakening
of their babies in the first place. To do this they need a signed birth "contract"
witnessed, a plan is only that. The father or
a birth witness stands by the delivery of the child and reminds the doctor to not clamp the cord. Again, this is only necessary if the
cord tore or for placenta previa. All other excuses are that, excuses, opinion, generally, outside
of empirical science.
The best idea is to go Lotus Birth, that the medical person, whoever
that is surgeon, ambulance medic, doula, friend, medic,
family doctor, is not clamping the cord at all. The parents may or may not detach
the placenta, at home, if at all. Professional
clamping and cutting tools are available, at all or most hospitals, and ambulance medics may carry them
in a kit, with the intent to
use them on a pulsating umbilical cord, too.
This intention of even the emergency medics, indicates controlled and inadequately
trained emergency persons, trained, by
controlled curriculums provided by the government agencies training across Canada and the States. I
am seeing, from my
knowledge and research on such matters, that all medical persons are able, and without questioning
by the police, being allowed
to endanger the newborn child. This is, needlessly, by hasty umbilical cord clamping.
The directions, of that training, are to take the placenta now clamped, thus
sealed, and put in a environmental bag, back to
home base, the hospital. There, the contents of the placenta will be likely drained. And,
how much blood was deprived the child,
as is in the situation of all other births, in the hospital, or a home birth, or at a birth center, will never ever be disclosed on the
child's own medical charts.
This failure of disclosure of such important facts of the child's birth is intentional. This failure of factual reporting will be found a
fact of this information missing off the child's medical records, is true around the world.
The world controlled medical associations and societies, who stated to the public
they were protecting their best interests and
do not harm, not even to the child, perceived their duty, were intending to endanger babies of this
blood deprivation. They are
intending to standardized 30-second clamping. This may be being controlled by the World Health
Organization, who have
persons doing the writings and the voting who are not qualified medical persons, studied on this issue,
and they represent the
Nations, they come from, and are making policy and executive decisions.
Many of the W.H.O. positional papers are dubious directives on this issue of
the timing of the clamping of the cord. They have
been found not to be taking a clear stand of the legal duty to protect all babies, as to Universal
Security of Person and Equal
Protection, stated in many democratic societies Constitutions. This is regardless of sex,
age, race and color and social status
or marital status of the family and mental and physical disabilities.
Such corporations, societies, associations, and organizations do
not have easy accessibility to write them from any member
of society. Why is that? They are faceless and appear to be without accountability yet want
the public's trust that they intend us
no deception or harm. If true, communication with them, would be more accessible, as well as the
Colleges of Physicians and
Surgeons in each State, Province, and Territory that they have contracted to protect the public, including
babies, as to policies,
competency in training, and truth in science and medicine, law, and ethics.
__________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested on
child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact: dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
