Proof: Theft of Umbilical Cord Stem Cell Blood by early umbilical cord clamping
Theft of the Baby's Placenta Blood and Invasion of Privacy of Genetic Code, the DNA, contained in the Placenta Tissues:
P 98, "After the placenta is delivered, the doctor
will examine it to make sure it is intact. It is then discarded
or sold to
companies for use in research or beauty products
." Reproduction, The Cycle of Life, ISBN
0-89193-606-8, ISBN 0-89193-666-1 (school ed.) The Middle School has used these books since
1983.
This harvesting of the placenta, by 2003, was including the harvesting of the
placenta blood which can only be done by
unethical immediate and early cord clamping, to Quote:
Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, by Gerard J. Tortora, Bergen Community
College and Sandra Reynolds
Grabowski, Purdue University, publisher, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. WIE ISBN 0=471-22472-3.
"Pharmaceutical companies use human placentas as a source of hormones, drugs, and blood: portions
of
placentas are also used for burn coverage. The placenta and umbilical cord blood can be frozen
to provide a future
source of pluripotent stem cells, for example, to repopulate red bone marrow following radiotherapy
for cancer."
What is happening, and concealed for about three generations, have been the
hospitals and the doctors involvement in the
secret use of the placenta blood and stem cells and hormones used in research and transplant blood. They have also sold the
drained placenta for further grinding up for more hormones and enzymes used by cosmetic companies.
This secrecy and invasion of privacy by the doctors and hospitals concealing
their using the organ and blood, the parents
believing it was immediately burned, has been a breach of trust. This is because also lab
companies had access to all genetic
codes of both sides of the family. They therefore had human tissue and cells and could be experimenting
in viruses and other
experiments on DNA of specific ethnic groups.
Terrorists who may infiltrate such lab companies could have such information
to harm one particular race or color or ethnic
group, group over another. This is would be based on the survival of the fittest and superior
races of even of religion philosophy.
We live in terrible times when we cannot even trust our own medical persons
who withheld their intent to impose their own
arbitrary decision which child and whose children they would stop the circulation flow of blood into
the child's lungs, whose child
would be stronger and most able. The medical associations, men and women, involved also
the misuse of the politicians
powers who were directly or indirectly involved in permitting increased medical costs of internal damages.
For example, holes in the heart, muscle disorders, brain and nervous disorders
are internal problems that can be traced back
to common factors of birth process. They have refused, as a probable conspiracy where two or more
groups take rights away
from certain persons, without approval of the Court, to then investigate the millions of persons are
drugs for internal disorders.
They have refused nor means of a Commission Inquiry as to false training and policies of medical associations
and experts.
For Example Policy #216, November 1995, put out and influencing the world
by The American College of Obstetricians
and Gynaecologists (ACOG) . This policy and other research on clamping of the infant's lifeline
have been mostly concealed to
most of the population. A few experts dissented from false policies going on and those that allowed,
have, so far, not been
disciplined by the medical associations having a duty to protect the public, not exploit them.
Most medical groups, including midwives, concealed best practice possible to
the public and the medical facts were
concealed that he clamping of the cord and cutting need only be done for a medical need if the
cord tore or for placenta previa.
All other reasons are trends and taught habits that were not questioned by nurses and other medical
groups long ago.
Many of the medical groups have formed false excuses not based in empirical
science/medicine. To name a few to excuse
early umbilical cord clamping that allows the hospital and the doctors to take the deprived infant's
blood, are:
- Fears of jaundice, when the cord clamping was not the factor but causes of jaundice were not including in the research as to any sickness in the mother or her being drugged during labor.
- Thick blood or too much blood is not to the timing of the clamping but to drugs changes of the blood, and drugging the mother was left out most research advocating of early cord clamping.
- Revival, it is not logical to revive the baby off hope of continued oxygenated and blood transfusion from his her own source of blood. Short cord or tight cord around the neck, the research left out that a wise person is patient, and is trained to first put two fingers between the neck to prevent neck injury and the child is normal and not injured like the Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada.
That particular Chow-case-law ought to have been followed by criminal investigation as to where the
child's deprived blood went.
The doctor did not know to do a vein to vein transfusion to a limp and gasping child, and did not know
early cord clamping would
cause the child to be impaired unless immediate transfusion to take the place of the deprived blood
was quickly done. In this
case that did not happen causing further damages to the child.
The early clamping as to the Canadian Society of Obstetrician and Gynecologists,
refusing to cancel it and train back to
full delayed cord clamping continue to endanger by these policies: Policy, #71, December
1998 and Policy #89 May 2000.
These policies are directing and influencing all medical persons from the surgeon to the 9-1-1 medic,
to follow endangering
practices to all children born in the care of a licensed medical person and the mothers not warned of
proper care in Biology
books, or by Library Reproduction books, or in Prenatal classes . . . all controlled of what is left
out by the Provincial Governments
and their agents they contract in civil servants governing such policies and trends.
These harmful trends damage, needlessly, millions of children. They look
normal, their injuries are internal The taxpayer is
burdened with higher medical and education costs in millions of additional costs.
The know best practice possible was told to the students in my own local Middle
School in the 1980's, but I believe the correct
method of umbilical cord was only told them, so they would not question their doctor, when it came time
for them to have their own
babies, and they trusted the doctor not to clamp a pulsating umbilical cord, and to assure the baby
was born in a warm room, so
the pulsation would not stop prematurely by a birth in a cold room and the baby not kept warm in a warmed
blanket.
The students believing the placenta was empty and the blood in the baby, then were not being warned
of the current trends that
some doctors or the hospital labs are selling the placenta. They are also releasing without
informed consent the availability of
the two families genetics codes in the DNA.
". . .Once the head and shoulders have emerged the rest of the birth proceeds rapidly. The
baby's body is finally free of its nine-month-long home. The pearly blue umbilical cord still
links child to womb, sending him blood from the placenta.
The doctor will
wait until the cord has stopped pulsating before clamping it above the baby's abdomen and severing it
." (See below what they
do with the placentas).
P 98, "After the placenta is delivered, the doctor
will examine it to make sure it is intact. It is then discarded
or sold to
companies for use in research or beauty products
."
Reproduction, The Cycle of Life, by Karen Jensen and the
Editors of U.S. News Books, page 98. ISBN 0-89193-606-8,
ISBN 0-89193-666-1 (school ed.) The Middle School has used these books since 1983.
See Autism list of contents.
Check out the Policy for training Doulas, Practical Nurses, Registered Nurses, Registered-Nurse-Midwives, MD., and Surgeons, and the Experts training and Policies, all medical associations.
While all have a duty of no harm done, they are not judging their colleagues involved in the theft of
stem cell blood that they
medical person made an arbitrary decision to do early clamping, using false policies and education bulletins
to escape personal
charges of criminal assault and battery and that the parents were not told no clamping or cutting of
the cord, need ever be done,
except if the cord tore or placenta previa. Both requiring an investigation how those situations
happened.
Lotus Birth, is simply a new name for what the Pioneers did prior to about 1923. They acted, when they
had no drugs to fight
infections by common sense and natural wisdom.
The doctors and medical persons (midwives) of today, must be having heavy education costs for them to
be bent to endangering
of the child to sell his/her blood. They must need ever nickle they get by selling the baby's
deprived blood and care less of the
invasion of privacy and who has possession of the child's DNA from both families.
Parents get smart. Take both civil and criminal actions against those who had a duty to protect every
person, without exception.
Most States and Provinces put the onus on the Professionals Act, governed by the Colleges of Surgeons
and Physicians and
Royal Colleges. There are Canadian Criminal Codes at this Web Site, and I am sure they are similar to
any other Nation's.
In the States the District Attorneys can take evidence and use their means to gather Evidence
against the hospitals and medical
persons concealing who they have sent the blood and placenta to, and charged medical insurance plans
under codes of organ
collection, and samples taken from organs. Millions of dollars are being billed to the taxpayers,
and this deception of needless
care has harmed millions of babies, too.
_________________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth. Search Lotusbirth
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.
We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact:
dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
