Why Choose Lotus Birth, No clamping of the Umbilical Cord?
Why the Lotus Birth following a warm water birth as the best choice for the care of the newborn baby? Comments by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education. (Revised December 13, 2003)
The Lotus birth is an old method with a new name. It is the old fashioned pioneer's method of no clamping or cutting of the umbilical cord, ever! Cords were only tied and cut if they had torn. That is rare incident, and likely reflects the baby was dropped. Babies are only dropped if the woman was placed on a higher operating table, and that is only necessary in a c-section, not a vaginal birth.
The warm water birth allows the mother a no drugged birth, a form of relaxing,
and she can catch her own baby. The warm
bath water does not cause the child hypothermia, that is the cold air shock and stop the pulsating and
blood transfusion of the
umbilical cord. The blood transfuses normally by the child's beat of the heart, and warm blood
flows easier.
When women were forced to abandon home births, by the 1920's, a political
ploy arranged by the medical societies, we did
not carrying on the wisdom of the pioneers of these natural birth practices. They experienced
no risk of infections in the cord, and
the child getting all his her immunities by full transfusion of the placenta blood into the baby's expanding
lungs.
By choosing Lotus Birth, no clamping or cutting of the cord, practiced by Canadian Pioneers before 1929, the wise ones, the baby is protected from the unethical teaching and practice of robbing the baby's stem cells, trapped in the placenta, or wasting it by burning it, when the blood belongs inside the baby's lungs.
All the nutrients of amino acids the proteins to build new cells are in the blood, plus important hormones
and enzymes and
vitamins and minerals, particularly the water soluble Vitamin B complex , Vitamin C, and vitamin A,
D, and E, and other minerals
and salts. Then there are the elements of blood, white cells to fight infection, red cells to
carry oxygen, newly released stem cells,
platelets to clot the blood (the baby does not need Vitamin K injected), and the plasma, the proteins...all
these are essential to
keep the baby's immune system healthy and give the baby a good start. Babies that are low volume
and pressured at birth by
being blood deprived are compromised babies, and they are in recovery for 6 weeks to 6 months to re-create
their blood back.
(Reference: Policy #71, December 1998, SOGC)
The baby is spared of unnecessary risks of cord infections. Lotus Birth is logical
because the cord heals faster and perfectly,
within days, rather than the 5 to 15 days and risk of infections of a cut cord. Also, the placenta,
in hospitals, and in some
homebirths, is skirted away from the mother's and father's vision. The parents are preoccupied
with the newborn baby. The
placenta is taken, in most instances, to labs in the hospital where they can be drained of its placenta
blood, that ought to have
been in the baby/owner own body. The parents will never be told how much blood was deprived their
baby by hasty clamping.
This placenta blood contains stem cells and many other valuable components of blood, to name a few: platelets, clot the blood,
plasma (proteins of the blood), white cells, fight infections, red cells have iron and carry oxygen
to all cells, stem cells replace
worn out cells, hormones and enzymes and iron reserves. What else happens is that unethical
DNA research on genetics is
being done, meaning the parents did not give informed consent for such genetic testings. The parents
have no idea who has that
information or why they want it. Taking such genetic tissue from the placenta and the blood is
invasion of privacy, no informed
consent was given, by the legal guardian(s) in most instances.
It is a fact the hospitals and medical persons are involved in selling both the blood and the placenta
for personal gain. It is sold,
without informed consent to research companies by doctors and other medical persons. Even, perhaps,
by some unethical
parents, indifferent to the illegal abuse to their child by making them a second class citizen, to provide
for another's needs. Some
parents can be found to be promoting the so-called donation of placenta stem cell blood over the internet.
They should be arrested. Because it is child abuse, depriving the child of something a court would not
deprive or order a child to
give up, not knowing the health of the child when early cord clamping is imposed on the child. That
hospitals and doctors have
secretly being involved in taking the child's blood by early cord clamping, does not make it any less
a crime. This is even if most
children were forced upon to tolerate the assault and battery, and lived.
It was none-the-less battery, and endangering to the child, lowering their quality of life, in some
instances, and impairing their
future choices in careers and occupations by the degree of blood volume and pressure deprived and oxygenated
blood
interruption to cells.
This is not a matter of opinion of practice. It is a matter of assault and the failure of best
practice possible, least harm done. We
must deal with those organizations and society that remained "silent on the issue." Or,
advocated in some way, directly or
indirectly, by their silence this was happening and it was okay to do that to a helpless child. It
would not be tolerated to a dumb
animal. It should not be condoned for the human baby, either.
Donation of Blood:
It is not the duty of the child to provide for another because the newborn baby is not 110 pounds, not age 17 years of age, not able to give informed consent, and in the time period the cord was clamped to get quantity of blood from the placenta (4 to 6 ounces of blood, even 30 ccs is an illegal deprivation to the child), it was not know the health condition of the child. Those are the principles to allow any individual to donate blood. The strong do not pick on the weak the vulnerable and those that cannot protect themselves. Universal Declarations of Human Rights demand that duty to the infant.
________________________________
If you would like to support women in informed choices and speak out against imposed "active management"
and harvesting of
the baby's blood, please visit this Petition link, below. It is to protect babies from being harvested
of their valued placenta blood
and to protect their mothers, too.
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.
We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.
______________________________
INCREASE OF SICKNESS IN OUR CHILDREN. AUTISM IS NOW ONE CHILD IN SIX HUNDRED, MILLIONS OF BABIES
IN THE USA CANNOT
ATTEND SCHOOL UNLESS THEY ARE ON RITALIN. OVER 200,000 CANADIAN CHILDREN ARE TREATED WITH THAT
DRUG AND OTHERS AS
WELL. We have never gone back to birth care and treatment of the woman during birth and the actual
care and treatment of the child, after birth, as far
as injections, clamping off the cord, and the time it was done, and why the information was not recorded
on the child's own medical chart?
Many children have delayed development problems, attention deficit disorders, and autism. Such
inflictions on the child have
been noted a common factor, the drugging of the mother, thus the child, and then followed by early cord
clamping, and
vaccinations when the child was in an anemic condition. Other known harm are forcing a mother
to birth flat on her back, or in a
semi-sitting positions. These position endanger oxygen to the child, render the child most likely
to suffer broken ribs and collar
bones, and skull and brain injury because these position keep the birth canal (pelvic bone) are closed
by up to 30 percent. These
positions are only done for the convenience of the medical person to dominate the control of the woman's
birth, and aid them to
cut the woman vagina, episiotomy, imposed on most inexperienced mothers, by trained rituals, and to
be followed in subsequent
birth deliveries.
In some instances, the infant was endangered with consent of their parents, but believed not informed
consent, but rather
deceived consent, not being told no clamping or cutting of the cord is a necessary medical procedure,
or the proper birth process
and position of birth options, or warm water births.
Some, the parents were indifferent and continued with medical support to impose the clamp on the pulsating
cord. All, my
opinion, were then involved in assault and battery on the child. Some records of the facts of
the violation exist. Some were
destroyed.
When the clamping was imposed without means of parents to stop that assault, battery, the parents, did
not press for criminal
charges against those involved in training medical persons to do this improper procedure. Some
may have sought private civil
actions, but that was self-interest for money, not to stop an illegal medical malpractice from happening
to other babies in the
same community.
It is documented since 1801, that early cord clamping is known to be the least secure protection to
the care of the child, during
and after birth. It has been known that all babies, including c-section babies, or premature babies
are no exception to have full
delayed clamping or no clamping on the cord, at all.
The only visual reasons for doing a need of cord clamping is if the cord tore or for placenta previa. A investigation how that
situation came about must also be part of either criminal and/or civil investigation and inquiry.
Either the medical person dropped the child (core tore), or the doctor doing a c-section was so rushed
he did not take time to be
aware of possible placenta previa, and cut into the placenta, or cut the cord during the c-section procedure. In any case, a child
early cord clamped must be investigated. Further, care for anemia and deprivation of essential
vitamins, minerals, enzymes,
hormones, stem cells, and iron supply must be perceived and checked for. This is because the nutrients
in the blood have been
deprived the child, in most instances, needlessly at birth.
Not Judging Medical opinions and decisions on early umbilical cord clamping:
This is not a situation to be open-minded. It is a situation of best practice possible and least risk of harm to the child, and the duty of all persons, parents, and medical persons to report child abuse. Early cord clamping and interruption of the child's umbilical cord, that would continue to transfuse blood, even to 20 minutes, documented by evidence of delayed clamping, is child abuse.
Myths attempting to excuse child abuse in medical practice and procedures on early umbilical cord
clamping:
There are many myths and trends, traditions and customs doctors attempt to use to excuse early cord clamping. These excuses need to be proven as a fact that full delayed clamping was not the first option and care and duty to the child: short cord, revival of a child, meconium, jaundice, anxiety of mother to see the child, doctor in a rush to prepare the delivery room for another (first come first serve), doctor wanted the type of blood type the baby had for another, fear of thick blood, fear of two much blood.
Condition that require blood letting can be done after the fact of tests and cause that to allow release
of blood from the baby is in
deed, a medical benefit. Until such tests are conclusive the baby is to be protected for equal
protection and security of person.
Facts: premature babies (those under 5-pounds) or born before full term, are most vulnerable to
have early cord clamping. Why?
Because they have more premature blood cells (stem cells), then do full term babies. The
selling of such stem cells is prime,
and the premature babies, as they struggle to live and create more blood supply, to live, are again
drained of 10 to 15 percent
total blood volume, every 2nd and 3rd day, until the plugs for their survival are pulled; then the premature
baby's organs are
sought.
No coroner's investigation on the care and treatment are done for such victimized baby, and the nurses
and lab technicians are
all part of the care and treatment of the babies, and failed to report abuse to the child. Many
parents may be involved, most are
improperly trained and did not make informed decisions. However, after the fact of being informed
their medical person
assaulted and violated their child, they did not write out a criminal complaint for investigation of
the care and services of their
child, and where done, and by whom, and the training of the medical person(s).
Pardons in Advance for medical malpractice on early umbilical cord clamping:
It is not anyone's duty to give pardons in advance, except Courts or by Acts of Parliament, in democracy. The duty of the Nations
is to allow Rule of Law to do its duty to investigate medical malpractice. There is much evidence
available to review history of
written training and practice to to look at the evidence of early cord clamping and the draining out
of the placenta that all medical
persons involved in early clamping were concealing the facts of evidence.
What most doctors and nurses involved in the birth were doing, world wide, was failing to write down
on the child's own medical
chart, the condition of the cord when clamped, red firm and pulsating, and the position of birth of
the child when clamped and time
of the cord clamped.
Some babies clamped when the head was born, or head and shoulders, were severely damaged. They had been
clamped for a
tight cord, rather then the first attempt of two fingers placed between the cord and the neck, to allow
full and continued transfusion
of blood through a pulsating cord. (See Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, at www.123-baby-birth.com.
Most of the internal damages to children are not caused by bad genes, but rather by improper medical
training and practices of
the medical persons, who are involved in profits being made by selling the placenta and stem cells,
or allow the Hospital to make
the income from these human organs sold and blood tissues.
There is no good excuse for false training and inadequate training of any medical person licensed and believed competent by the government. This is breach of trust and bad faith to the public, at large. We are faced with higher medical costs, in the millions of dollars, for millions of victims damaged, needlessly. We are faced with higher education costs for compromised children, needlessly caused at birth medical malpractice.
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
ccontact:
dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
