Lotus Birth, Photos, Dr. Sarah Buckley
Dr. Sarah Buckley shares no harm done, no clamping and no cutting of the umbilical cord, now called the Lotus Birth.
Lotus Birth
(
Photos
)
, is a new ritual for us, having only been described in chimpanzees before 1974, when Clair
Lotus Day-
pregnant and living in California- began to question the routine cutting of the cord. Her searching
led her to an obstetrician who
was sympathetic to her wishes, and her son Trimurti was born in hospital and taken home with his cord
uncut. Lotus Birth was
named by, and seeded through Clair to Jeannine Parvati Baker in the US and Shivam Rachana
in Australia, who have both
been strong advocates for this gentle practice.
Since 1974, many babies have been born this way, including babies born at home and in hospital, on land
and in water, and even
by caesarean section. Lotus birth is a beautiful and logical extension of natural childbirth, and invites
us to reclaim the so-called
third stage of birth, and to honour the placenta, our baby’s first source of nourishment.
________________________
All mothers have a right to natural birth education and practice and to know the placenta does not have
to be removed for
cosmetic reasons. The danger to the child is the cord is not allowed to stop pulsating of the completion
of the child's birth to be
normal for the benefit of the mother and the child. If you feel the informed choice should be
the mothers, please consider signing
this petition, to protect babies from being harvested by deprivation of their placenta blood and to
protect their mothers, too. The
link is at:
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.
We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.
_________________________________________
Comments by Donna Young :
By choosing Lotus Birth, no clamping or cutting of the cord, practiced by Canadian Pioneers before 1929, by the wise ones, the baby is protected from unethical teaching and practice of robbing the baby's stem cells, trapped in the placenta. The baby is spared of unnecessary risks of cord infections. Lotus Birth is logical because the cord heals faster and perfectly, then a cut cord. Also, the placenta, in hospitals, and in some homebirths, is skirted away from the mother's and father's vision. The parents are preoccupied with the newborn baby. The placenta is taken, in most instances, to labs in the hospital where they can be drained of its placenta blood which ought to have been inside the baby/owner.
This placenta blood contains stem cells and many other valuable components of blood, to name a few: platelets, clot the blood,
plasma (proteins of the blood), white cells, fight infections, red cells have iron and carry oxygen
to all cells, stem cells replace
worn out cells, hormones and enzymes and iron reserves.
What else happens is that unethical DNA research on genetics is being done. The parents have no
idea who has that
information or why they want it. Taking such genetic tissue from the placenta and the blood is
invasion of privacy, no informed
consent was given, by the legal guardian(s) in most instances.
It is a fact the hospitals and medical persons are involved in selling both the blood and the placenta
for personal gain. It is sold,
without informed consent to research companies by doctors and other medical persons. Even, perhaps,
by some unethical
parents, indifferent to the illegal abuse to their child by making them a second class citizen, to provide
for another's needs. Some
parents can be found to be promoting the so-called donation of placenta stem cell blood over the internet.
They should be arrested. Because it is child abuse, depriving the child of something a court would not
deprive or order a child to
give up, not knowing the health of the child when early cord clamping is imposed on the child.
No one is dissenting that the hospitals and some doctors have secretly being involved in taking the
child's blood by early cord
clamping, does not make it any less a crime. This is even if most children were forced upon to
tolerate the assault and battery,
and lived.
It was none-the-less battery, and endangering to the child, lowering their quality of life, in some
instances, and impairing their
future choices in careers and occupations by the degree of blood volume and pressure deprived and oxygenated
blood
interruption to cells.
This is not a matter of opinion of practice. It is a matter of assault and the failure of best
practice possible, least harm done. We
must deal with those organizations and society that remained "silent on the issue." Or,
advocated in some way, directly or
indirectly, by their silence this was happening and it was okay to do that to a helpless child. It
would not be tolerated to a dumb
animal. It should not be condoned for the human baby, either.
Donation of Blood:
It is not the duty of the child to provide for another because the newborn baby is not 110 pounds, not age 17 years of age, not able to give informed consent, and not known to be in good health in the time period the cord was clamped to get quantity of blood from the placenta (4 to 6 ounces of blood), even 30 ccs is an illegal deprivation to the child. Again, it could not be known for sure the health condition of the child. Even premature babies are being early cord clamped for their stem cell blood, higher in count then a full term baby's.
Those are the principles to allow any individual to donate blood. The strong do not pick on the
weak the vulnerable and those that
cannot protect themselves. Universal Declarations of Human Rights demand that duty to the infant.
Many children have delayed development problems, attention deficit disorders, and autism. Such
inflictions on the child have
been noted a common factor, the drugging of the mother, thus the child, and then followed by early cord
clamping, and
vaccinations when the child was in an anemic condition.
Other known harm are forcing a mother to birth flat on her back, or in a semi-sitting positions. These
position endanger oxygen to
the child, render the child most likely to suffer broken ribs and collar bones, and skull and brain
injury because these position
keep the birth canal (pelvic bone) are closed by up to 30 percent.
These positions are only done for the convenience of the medical person to dominate the control of the
woman's birth, and aid
them to cut the woman vagina, episiotomy, imposed on most inexperienced mothers, by trained rituals,
and to be followed in
subsequent birth deliveries.
In some instances, the infant was endangered with consent of their parents, but believed not informed
consent, but rather
deceived consent, not being told no clamping or cutting of the cord is a necessary medical procedure,
or the proper birth process
and position of birth options, or warm water births.
Some, the parents were indifferent and continued with medical support to impose the clamp on the pulsating
cord. All, my
opinion, were then involved in assault and battery on the child. Some records of the facts of
the violation exist. Some were
destroyed.
When the clamping was imposed without means of parents to stop that assault, battery, the parents, did
not press for criminal
charges against those involved in training medical persons to do this improper procedure. Some
may have sought private civil
actions, but that was self-interest for money, not to stop an illegal medical malpractice from happening
to other babies in the
same community.
It is documented since 1801, that early cord clamping is known to be the least secure protection to
the care of the child, during
and after birth. It has been known that all babies, including c-section babies, or premature babies
are no exception to have full
delayed clamping or no clamping on the cord, at all.
The only visual reasons for doing a need of cord clamping is if the cord tore or for placenta previa. A investigation how that
situation came about must also be part of either criminal and/or civil investigation and inquiry.
Either the medical person dropped the child (core tore), or the doctor doing a c-section was so rushed
he did not take time to be
aware of possible placenta previa, and cut into the placenta, or cut the cord during the c-section procedure. In any case, a child
early cord clamped must be investigated. Further, care for anemia and deprivation of essential
vitamins, minerals, enzymes,
hormones, stem cells, and iron supply must be perceived and checked for. This is because the nutrients
in the blood have been
deprived the child, in most instances, needlessly at birth.
Not Judging Medical opinions and decisions on early umbilical cord clamping:
This is not a situation to be open-minded. It is a situation of best practice possible and least risk of harm to the child, and the duty of all persons, parents, and medical persons to report child abuse. Early cord clamping and interruption of the child's umbilical cord, that would continue to transfuse blood, even to 20 minutes, documented by evidence of delayed clamping, is child abuse.
Myths attempting to excuse child abuse in medical practice and procedures on early umbilical cord
clamping:
There are many myths and trends, traditions and customs doctors attempt to use to excuse early cord clamping. These excuses need to be proven as a fact that full delayed clamping was not the first option and care and duty to the child: short cord, revival of a child, meconium, jaundice, anxiety of mother to see the child, doctor in a rush to prepare the delivery room for another (first come first serve), doctor wanted the type of blood type the baby had for another, fear of thick blood, fear of two much blood.
Condition that require blood letting can be done after the fact of tests and cause that to allow release
of blood from the baby is in
deed, a medical benefit. Until such tests are conclusive the baby is to be protected for equal
protection and security of person.
Facts: premature babies (those under 5-pounds) or born before full term, are most vulnerable to
have early cord clamping. Why?
Because they have more premature blood cells (stem cells), then do full term babies. The
selling of such stem cells is prime,
and the premature babies, as they struggle to live and create more blood supply, to live, are again
drained of 10 to 15 percent
total blood volume, every 2nd and 3rd day, until the plugs for their survival are pulled; then the premature
baby's organs are
sought.
No coroner's investigation on the care and treatment are done for such victimized baby, and the nurses
and lab technicians are
all part of the care and treatment of the babies, and failed to report abuse to the child. Many
parents may be involved, most are
improperly trained and did not make informed decisions. However, after the fact of being informed
their medical person
assaulted and violated their child, they did not write out a criminal complaint for investigation of
the care and services of their
child, and where done, and by whom, and the training of the medical person(s).
Pardons in Advance for medical malpractice on early umbilical cord clamping:
It is not anyone's duty to give pardons in advance, except Courts or by Acts of Parliament, in democracy. The duty of the Nations
is to allow Rule of Law to do its duty to investigate medical malpractice. There is much evidence
available to review history of
written training and practice to to look at the evidence of early cord clamping and the draining out
of the placenta that all medical
persons involved in early clamping were concealing the facts of evidence.
What most doctors and nurses involved in the birth were doing, world wide, was failing to write down
on the child's own medical
chart, the condition of the cord when clamped, red firm and pulsating, and the position of birth of
the child when clamped and time
of the cord clamped.
Some babies clamped when the head was born, or head and shoulders, were severely damaged. They had been
clamped for a
tight cord, rather then the first attempt of two fingers placed between the cord and the neck, to allow
full and continued transfusion
of blood through a pulsating cord. (See Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, at www.123-baby-birth.com.
Most of the internal damages to children are not caused by bad genes, but rather by improper medical
training and practices of
the medical persons, who are involved in profits being made by selling the placenta and stem cells,
or allow the Hospital to make
the income from these human organs sold and blood tissues. There is no good excuse for false training
and inadequate training
of any medical person licensed and believed competent by the government. This is breach of trust
and bad faith to the public, at
large. We are faced with higher medical costs, in the millions of dollars, for millions of victims
damaged, needlessly. We are
faced with higher education costs for compromised children, needlessly caused at birth medical malpractice.
________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact:
dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
