Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration, Don't Clamp the Cord.

Dr. Sarah Buckley, (see her Statutory Declaration, red title below ), trained in obstetrics, residing in Australia, shares her concerns of risks of accepting drugs during labor, and that there is no medical need to clamp the infant's lifeline, or cut the cord, ever, without a proven need how it is a medical benefit to the child.
For your convenience, this Url is: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-314.htm
Dr. Sarah Buckley is putting women in control, where and with whom to birth their babies. Dr. Sarah Buckley, supports primal birth, and shares quotations from Dr. Michel Odent. Dr. Michel Ordent is a support of Natural Birth Education.
Primal birth would be getting back to our grandmother's and great grandmother's pioneer birth, prior to the 1920's. Primal birth is, today, identified as Lotus Birth (Lotusbirth). Lotus Birth rights are quite a contrast to a review I did on the Myles Textbook for Midwives , 11th edition, 1989.
This information is shared by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education. Revised March 4, 2004 (www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-314.htm) Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com

Please, for prevention of internal injuries to any child, visit this protect babies and their mothers too, Petition . This is to prevent the increase of autism, holes in the heart, and most other internal disorders. We ask support to prevent further injuries to Canadian Babies. We recommend a Task Force to help educate women in every community.

Please also see Doris Haire's article on the harm of drugs during a woman's pregnancy and during labor and also to stop early umbilical cord clamping at www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-499.htm

Dr. Sarah Buckley has provided the owner of this website with videos (no clamping or cutting the cord from the placenta) that may be used to educate the Judge or Jury in any forth coming litigation.

The need of the Courts to Judge this alleged medical malpractice is now deemed necessary to protect all babies from the clamping process, done only for cosmetic reasons, in most instances, and where done must be a perceived need for a benefit to the child, by facts of science. Those facts are often missing and failed to be documented on the child's own medical reports.

No clamping or cutting of the cord is safe to use in hospitals and home births, and is hoped it will become the preferred method of informed mothers. There is implied duty for all medical persons to so advise the expecting mother, no need, ever to clamp the cord, except for (1) the cord broke (2) placenta previa.

If there is a legitimate concern or fear of drugs taken during labor, that is stated by facts of science to require hasty clamping, there is duty to inform the mother which drugs endanger the child's blood supply, to be so toxic 20 to 50 percent of the blood must be denied the child, risking then blood expanders and oxygen from another source.

Dr. Buckley supports drugging of the fetus may require hasty clamping. If that is true, then the birthing woman is not forewarned of consequences, nor of safer alternatives to labor management.
- See Oxytocin warning by Martindale Pharmacopoeia . See Oxytocin, and other drug concerns by CPS , Candian, Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties.

All reasons for denying a child of natural oxygenated blood ought to be investigated before an unbiased judge or review board, of some kind for Constitutional violations and endangering to any child hastily clamped before all pulsation had naturally ceased.

Please read what Dr. Sarah Buckley has to state in her Declaration sent to me and signed to be true:

Declaration of Dr. Sarah Buckley :

The following statement is true, to the best of my knowledge, experience, training and beliefs as

a medical practitioner trained in General Practice (family MD) and GP-obstetrics
a writer and researcher on pregnancy, birth and parenting, including papers on ‘third stage management’
a mother of four children, all born naturally at home
three of these being ‘lotus births’, where the cord remained uncut.

I believe that the current obstetric practice of early cord clamping and cutting is misguided and causing harm to mothers and newborn babies, and this practice should be stopped, as a routine, and should only be used where the benefits outweigh the risks and with informed choice from parents.

In summary, I believe that this practice is causing, or significantly contributing to, the following harmful outcomes, which are further explained and referenced as below in my article Leaving Well Alone- A Natural Approach to Third Stage. (Buckley 2000)

(NB ‘third stage’, also known as ‘placental stage’, is the time between delivery of the baby and delivery of the placenta)

Harm to the baby

denial of the full ‘placental transfusion’ to the newborn baby
disallowing the baby to regulate their own level of placental transfusion
sub-optimal blood volumes in most newborn babies subjected to this treatment
for some babies, deprivation of up to half of total blood volume (54 to 160 ml out of 300 to 350 ml)
deprivation of oxygen contained in the placental blood
loss of ‘life-line’ if breathing is delayed, increasing risk of damage from lack of oxygen
inadequate tissue and organ perfusion in the time after birth
possible long-term organ damage, eg subtle brain injury
increased likelihood of anaemia
deprivation of stem cells contained in the placental/cord blood
increased need for resuscitation

increased risk of respiratory problems, especially in vulnerable babies

Harm to the Mother :

interference in maternal third stage physiology
interference with third stage hormonal systems (oxytocin, endorphins), linked to bonding and to natural means of preventing haemorrhage
Increased difficulty in delivering a bulky placenta
Increased risk of haemorrhage
Increased risk of retained placenta
Increased risk of baby’s blood entering mothers circulation

Increased risk of subsequent RH incompatibility

Late severance :

All other mammals sever the cord only after the placenta is delivered, and, to my knowledge, all traditional cultures follow this practice also.
This late severance is safe and, ensures that the baby gets an optimal (but not a standard) placental transfusion and that the mother is protected from retained placenta, post partum haemorrhage, and leakage of the baby’s blood into her circulation, as above. Furthermore the conditions after birth, which are physiologically unique, are optimal for the formation of the life-long and strong attachment, or bond, between mother and baby, as mediated by hormones in both mother and baby.
This is also the time when instinctive mothering behaviours are ‘switched on’ in the brains of all mammalian species, including humans, and I believe that interference at this time contributes to western cultural difficulties in accessing our motherly intuitions and instincts with our babies.

Lotus Birth :

I also have experience, as above, with, a practice called ‘lotus birth’, where the cord is not cut at all, but baby and placenta remain attached until natural separation of the cord, at 3 to 9 days after birth. This practice allows the baby to get the full ‘placental transfusion’ that nature intends.
See below for my article explaining this practice, and the physiological/ philosophical/ spiritual reasons behind it.(Lotus Birth- a Ritual for our Times- Buckley 2002).
As well, I have provided a video of my newborn son Jacob, soon after birth and 3 days later with his cord and placenta still attached, and photos of my other children.
As a mother, I have found this to be a very safe and satisfying practice.
As a medical practitioner, I have found no risks or possible risks to the baby, with the proviso that this practice- or any long delay in clamping- may not be compatible with use of drugs and procedures. (In particular, caution must be exercised with the use of syntocinon/pitocin, which over-rides the baby’s ability to self-regulate the placental transfusion, and can cause over-perfusion.)
As a writer on birth issues, I have heard from many other parents who have practised lotus birth, and found it to be beneficial to their baby, both short and long-term, and to their relationship with their baby.

Attachment 1

Leaving well alone: a natural approach to the third stage of labour

Copyright Sarah Buckley 6/00

The medical approach to pregnancy and birth has become so ingrained in our culture, that we have forgotten the way of birth of our ancestors: a way that has ensured our survival as a species for millennia. In the rush to supposedly protect mothers and babies from misfortune and death, modern western obstetrics has neglected to pay its dues to the Goddess, to Mother Nature, whose complex and elegant systems of birth are interfered with on every level by this new approach, even as we admit our inability to understand or control these elemental forces.

Medical interference in pregnancy, labour and birth is well documented, and the negative sequellae are well researched. However, medical management of the third stage of labour- the time between the baby’s birth, and the emergence of the placenta-, to my mind, more insidious. At the time when Mother Nature prescribes awe and ecstasy, we have injections, examinations, and clamping and pulling on the cord. Instead of body heat and skin to skin contact, we have separation and wrapping. Where time should stand still for those eternal moments of first contact, as mother and baby fall deeply in love, we have haste to deliver the placenta and clean up for the next ‘case’.

This ‘management ‘ of the third stage, which has been taken even further in the last ten years, with the popularity of “active management of the third stage” (see below), has its own risks for mother and baby. While much of the activity is designed to reduce the risk of maternal bleeding, or postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), which is most certainly a serious event, it seems that, as with the active management of labour, the medical approach to labour and birth actually leads to many of the problems that active management is designed to address.

Active management also creates specific and potentially life-threatening problems for mother and baby. In particular, use of active management leads to a newborn baby being deprived of up to half of his or her expected blood volume. This extra blood, which is intended to perfuse the newly functioning lungs and other vital organs, is discarded along with the placenta when active management is used, with possible sequellae such as breathing difficulties and anaemia, especially in vulnerable babies.

Drugs used in active management have documented risks for the mother, including death, and we do not know the long-term effects of these drugs, which are given at a critical stage of brain development, for the baby.

Hormones in the third stage :

As a mammalian species- that is, we have mammary glands that produce milk for our young- we share almost all features of labour and birth with our fellow mammals. We have in common the complex orchestration of labour hormones, produced deep within our “mammalian”, or middle brain, to aid us and ultimately ensure the survival of our offspring.

We are helped in birth by three major mammalian hormone systems, all of which play important roles in the third stage as well. The hormone oxytocin causes the uterine contractions that signal labour, as well as helping us to enact our instinctive mothering behaviours. Endorphins, the body’s natural opiates, produce an altered state of consciousness and aid us in transmuting pain: and the fight or flight hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline (epinephrine and norepinephrine- also known as catecholamines or CAs ) give us the burst of energy that we need to push our babies out in second stage.

During the third stage of labour, strong uterine contractions continue at regular intervals, under the continuing influence of oxytocin. The uterine muscle fibres shorten, or retract, with each contraction, leading to a gradual decrease in the size of the uterus, which helps to “shear” the placenta away from its attachment site. Third stage is complete when the placenta is delivered.

For the new mother, the third stage is a time of reaping the rewards of her labour. Mother Nature provides peak levels of oxytocin, the hormone of love, and endorphins, hormones of pleasure for both mother and baby. Skin to skin contact and the baby’s first attempts to breast feed further augment maternal oxytocin levels, strengthening the uterine contractions that will help the placenta to separate, and the uterus to contract down. In this way, oxytocin acts to prevent haemorrhage, as well as to establish, in concert with the other hormones, the close bond that will ensure a mother’s care and protection, and thus her baby’s survival.

At this time, the high adrenaline levels of second stage, which have kept mother and baby wide-eyed and alert at first contact, will be falling, and a very warm atmosphere is necessary to counteract the cold, shivering feelings that a woman has as her adrenaline levels drop. If the environment is not well heated, and/or the mother is worried or distracted, continuing high levels of adrenaline will counteract oxytocin’s beneficial effects on her uterus, therefore, according to Odent (1992), increasing the risk of haemorrhage.

For the baby as well, the reduction in fight or flight hormones, which have also peaked at birth, is critical. If, because of extended separation, these hormones are not soothed by contact with the mother, the baby can go into psychological shock which, according to author Joseph Chilton Pearce, will prevent the activation of specific brain functions that is nature’s blueprint for this time. Pearce believes that the separation of mother and baby after birth is “the most devastating event of life, which leaves us emotionally and psychologically crippled” (Pearce 1992)

One might wonder whether the modern epidemic of “stress” - the term was invented by researchers in the early 20^th century- and stress-related illness in our culture is a further outcome of current third-stage practices. It is scientifically plausible that our entire Hypothalamic-Pituatary-Adrenal (HPA) axis, which mediates long-term stress responses and immune function, as well as short-term fight-or-flight reaction, is permanently mis-set by the continuing high stress hormone levels that ensue when newborn babies are routinely separated from their mothers.

Michel Odent, in his review of research on the “primal period” (the time between conception and the first birthday), concludes that interference or dysfunction at this time affects the development of our “capacity to love”, which is particularly vulnerable around the time of birth, being connected hormonally to the oxytocin system. (Odent, 1998) Research by Jacobsen (1990, 1997)) and Raine (1994), among others, suggests that contemporary tragedies such as suicide, drug addiction and violent criminality may be linked to problems in the perinatal period such as exposure to drugs, birth complications and separation or rejection from the mother.

A crucial role for birth attendants in these times is to ensure that a woman’s mammalian instincts are protected and valued during pregnancy, birth and afterwards. Ensuring unhurried and uninterrupted contact between mother and baby after birth, adjusting the temperature to accommodate a shivering mother, and to allow skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding, and not removing the baby for any reason- these are practices that are sensible, intuitive and safe, and help to synchronise our hormonal systems with our genetic blueprint, giving maximum success and pleasure for both partners, in the critical function of child-rearing.

The baby, the cord, and active management :

Adaptation to life outside the womb is the major physiological task for the baby in third stage. In utero, the wondrous placenta fulfills the functions of lungs, kidney, gut and liver for our babies. Blood flow to these organs is minimal until the baby takes a first breath, at which time huge changes begin in the organisation of the circulatory system.

Within the baby’s body, blood becomes, over several minutes, diverted away from the umbilical cord and placenta and, as the lungs fill with air, blood is sucked into the pulmonary (lung) circulation. Mother Nature ensures a reservoir of blood in the cord and placenta, that provides the additional blood necessary for these newly-perfused pulmonary and organ systems.

The transfer of this reservoir of blood from the placenta to the baby happens in a step-wise progression, with blood entering the baby with each third-stage contraction, and some blood returning to the placenta between contractions. Crying slows the intake of blood, which is also controlled by constriction of the vessels within the cord (Gunther 1957) - both of which imply that the baby may be able to regulate the transfusion according to individual need.

Gravity will affect the transfer of blood, with optimal transfer occurring when the baby remains at or below the level of the uterus until the cessation of cord pulsation signals that the transfer is complete. This process of “physiological clamping” typically takes 3 minutes, but may be longer, or can be complete in only one minute. (Linderkamp 1982)

This elegant and time-tested system, which ensures that an optimum, but not a standard, amount of blood is transferred, is rendered inoperable by the current practice of early clamping of the cord- usually within 30 seconds of birth.

Early clamping has been widely adopted in Western obstetrics as part of the package known as active management of the third stage. This comprises the use of an oxytocic agent- a drug that, like oxytocin, causes the uterus to contract strongly- given usually by injection into the mothers thigh as the baby is born, as well as early cord clamping, and ‘controlled cord traction’- that is, pulling on the cord to deliver the placenta as quickly as possible.

Haste becomes necessary, because the oxytocic injection will, within a few minutes, cause very strong uterine contractions that can trap an undelivered placenta, making an operation and ‘manual removal’ necessary. Furthermore, if the cord is not clamped before the oxytocic effect commences, the baby is at risk of having too much blood suddenly pumped from the placenta by the over-zealous contractions.

While the aim of active management is to reduce the risk of haemorrhage for the mother, “its widespread acceptance was not preceded by studies evaluating the effects of depriving neonates [newborn babies] of a significant volume of blood” (Piscane 1996)

It is estimated that early clamping deprives the baby of 54 to 160 ml of blood, (Usher 1963) which represents up to half of a baby’s total blood volume at birth. “Clamping the cord before the infant’s first breath results in blood being sacrificed from other organs to establish pulmonary perfusion.[blood supply to the lungs].Fatality may result if the child is already hypovolemic [low in blood volume].” (Morley 1997)

Where the baby is lifted above the uterus before clamping- for example during caesarean surgery- blood will drain back to the placenta by gravity, making these babies especially liable to receive less than their expected blood volume. The consequence of this may be an increased risk of respiratory (breathing) distress- several studies have shown this condition, which is common in caesarean-born babies, to be eliminated when a full placental transfusion was allowed. (Peltonen 1981, Landau 1953).

The baby whose cord is clamped early also loses the iron contained within that blood- early clamping has been linked with an extra risk of anaemia in infancy. (Grajeda 1997,Michaelson 1995).

These sequellae of early clamping were recognised as far back as 1801, when Erasmus Darwin wrote

“Another thing very injurious to the child is the tying and cutting of the navel string too soon; which should always be left till the child has not only repeatedly breathed but till all pulsation in the cord ceases. As otherwise the child is much weaker than it ought to be, a part of the blood being left in the placenta which ought to have been in the child” (E. Darwin, Zoonomia, Vol III, p 302, London, 1801).

In one study, premature babies experiencing delayed cord clamping-, the delay was only 30 seconds- showed a reduced need for transfusion, less severe breathing problems, better oxygen levels, and indications of probable improved long-term outcomes, compared to those whose cords were clamped immediately. (Kinmond 1993).

Some studies have shown an increased risk of polycythemia (more red blood cells in the blood) and jaundice when the cord is clamped later. Polycythemia may be beneficial, in that more red cells means more oxygen being delivered to the tissues. The risk that polycythemia will cause the blood to become too thick (hyperviscosity syndrome), which is often used as an argument against delayed cord clamping, seems to be negligible in healthy babies. (Morley 1998)

Jaundice is almost certain when a baby gets his or her full quota of blood, and is caused by the breakdown of the normal excess of blood to produce bilirubin, the pigment that causes the yellow appearance of a jaundiced baby. There is, however, no evidence of adverse effects from this. (Morley 1998). One author has proposed that jaundice, which is present in almost all human infants to some extent, and which is often prolonged by breastfeeding, may actually be beneficial because of the anti-oxidant properties of bilirubin. (Gartner 1998)

Early cord clamping carries the further disadvantage of depriving the baby of the oxygen-rich placental blood that mother nature provides to tide the baby over until breathing is well established. In situations of extreme distress- for example, if the baby takes several minutes to breathe-this reservoir of oxygenated blood can be life saving, but, ironically, standard practice is to cut the cord immediately if resuscitation is needed.

The placental circulation acts, when the cord is intact, as a conduit for any drug given to the mother, whether during pregnancy, labour or third stage. Garrison (1999) reports that Narcan, which is sometimes needed by the baby to counteract the sedating effect of pain-relieving drugs such as pethidine (demorol), given to the mother in labour, can be effectively administered via the mother’s veins in third stage, waking up the newborn baby in a matter of seconds.

The recent discovery of the amazing properties of cord blood, in particular the stem cells contained within it, heightens, for me, the need to ensure that a newborn baby gets its full quota. These cells are unique to this stage of development, and will migrate to the baby’s bone morrow soon after birth, transforming themselves into various types of blood-making cells.

Cord blood harvesting, which is currently being promoted to fill Cord Blood Banks for future treatment of children with leukaemia, involves immediate clamping, and up to 100 ml of this extraordinary blood can be taken from the baby to whom it belongs. Perhaps this is justifiable where active management is practiced, and the blood would be otherwise discarded, but, unfortunately, cord blood donation is incompatible with a physiological (natural) third stage.

Active management and the mother :

Active management (oxytocic, early clamping and controlled cord traction) represents a further development in third stage interference that began in the mid-seventeenth century, when male attendants began confining women to bed, and cord clamping was introduced to spare the bed linen.

Pulling on the cord was first recommended by Mauriceau in 1673, who feared that the uterus might close before the placenta was spontaneously delivered (Inch 1984). In fact, the recumbent (lying) postures, increasingly adopted under doctor’s care meant that spontaneous delivery of the placenta was less likely: the upright postures that women and midwives have traditionally used encourage the placenta to fall out with the help of gravity.

The first oxytocic to be used medically was egot, derived from a fungal infection of rye. Ergot was known to to be used by 17^th and 18^th century European midwives. Its use was limited, however, by its toxicity. It was refined and revived as ergometrine in the 1930’s, and by the late 1940’s, some doctors were using it as a preventatively, as well as therapeutically, for post partum haemorrhage. (Inch 1984) Potential side effects from ergot derivatives include a rise in blood pressure, nausea, vomiting, headache, palpitations, cerebral haemorrhage, cardiac arrest, convulsion and even death.

Synthetic oxytocin, which mimics the effects of natural oxytocin on the uterus, was first marketed in the 1950’s, and has largely replaced ergometrine, although a combination drug, called syntometrine, is still used, especially for severe haemorrhage. Syntocinon causes an increase in the strength of contractions, whereas ergometrine causes a large, ‘tonic’ contraction, which also increases the chance of trapping the placenta. Ergometrine also interferes with the process of placental separation, increasing the chance of partial separation. (Sorbe 1978)

Recently active management has been proclaimed “the routine management of choice for women expecting a single baby by vaginal delivery in a maternity hospital” (Prendville 1999), mostly because of the results of the recent Hinchingbrooke trial, comparing active versus “expectant” (physiological) management.

In this trial (Rogers 1998), which involved only women at low risk of bleeding, active management was associated with a post partum hemorrhage (blood loss greater than 500ml) rate of 6.8%, compared with 16.5% for expectant (non-active) management. Rates of severe PPH (loss > 1000ml) were low in both groups- 1.7% active and 2.6% expectant.

The authors note further that, from these figures ten women would need to receive active management to prevent one PPH. They add “Some women … may rate a small personal risk of PPH of little importance compared with intervention in an otherwise straightforward labour, whereas others may wish to take all measures to reduce the risk of PPH.”

Reading this paper, one must wonder how it is that almost 1 in 6 women bled after “physiological” management, and whether one or more components of western obstetric practices might not be actually increasing the rate of haemorrhage.

Botha (1968) attended over 26 000 Bantu women over 10 years, and reports that “a retained placenta was seldom seen…blood transfusion for postpartum haemorrhage was never necessary.” Bantu women deliver both baby and placenta while squatting, and the cord is not attended to until the placenta delivers itself by gravity.

There is some evidence that the practice of clamping the cord, which is not practiced by indigenous cultures, contributes to both PPH and retained placenta by trapping extra blood (around 100ml, as described above) within the placenta. This increases placental bulk, which the uterus cannot contract efficiently against, and which is more difficult to expel. (Walsh 1968)

Other western practices that may contribute to PPH include the use of oxytocin for induction and augmentation (speeding up labour) (Brinsden 1978, McKenzie 1979), episiotomy or perineal trauma, forceps delivery, caesarean and previous caesarean (because of placental problems- see Hemminki 1996).

Gilbert (1987) notes that PPH rates in her UK hospital more than doubled from 5% in 1969-70 to 11% in 1983-5, and concludes “The changes in labour ward practice over the last 20 years have resulted in the re-emergence of PPH as a significant problem.” In particular, she links an increased risk of bleeding with induction using oxytocin, forceps delivery, long first and second stages (but not prolonged pushing) and the use of epidurals, which increase the chance of forceps and of a long second stage.

As noted, western practices do not facilitate the production of a mother’s own oxytocin, neither is attention paid to reducing adrenaline levels in the minutes after birth, both of which are physiologically likely to improve uterine contractions and therefore reduce haemorrhage.

Clamping the cord, especially at an early stage, may also cause the extra blood trapped within the placenta to be forced back through the placenta into the mother's blood supply with the third stage contractions. (Doolittle 1966, Lapido 1971) This “feto-maternal transfusion” increases the chance of future blood group incompatibility problems, which occur when the current baby’s blood enters the mother’s blood stream, causing an immune reaction which can be reactivated and destroy the baby’s blood cells in a subsequent pregnancy, causing anaemia or even death.

The use of oxytocin, which strengthens contractions, either during labour, or in third stage, has also been linked to an increased risk of feto-maternal hemorrhage and blood group incompatibility problems. (Beer 1969, Weinstein 1971)

The World Health Organisation, in its 1996 publication Care in Normal Birth: a practical guide, argue that “In a healthy population (as is the case in most developed countries), postpartum blood loss up to 1000 ml may be considered as physiological and does not necessitate treatment other than oxytocics…”. In relation to routine oxytocics and controlled cord traction, WHO cautions that “Recommendation of such a policy would imply that the benefits of such management would offset and even exceed the risks, including potentially rare but serious risks that might become manifest in the future.”.

Choosing a natural third stage :

Choosing to forego preventative oxytocics, to clamp late (if at all), and to deliver the placenta by our own effort all require forethought, commitment, and that we choose birth attendants that are comfortable and experienced with these choices.
A natural third stage is more than this, however-we must ensure respect for the emotional and hormonal processes of both mother and baby, remembering how unique this time is. Michel Odent stresses the importance of not interrupting, even with words, and believes that ideally the new mother feels unobserved and uninhibited in the first encounter with her baby. (Odent 1992) This level of non-interference is uncommon, even in home and birth centre settings.

Lotus birth, the subject of this book, gives us a further chance to “slow the fire drill” after birth, as midwife Gloria Lemay puts it, and allows our babies the full metaphysical, as well as physical, benefit of prolonged contact with the placenta. Lotus birth, like a good midwife, also secludes mother and baby in the early hours and days, ensuring rest and keeping visitors to a minimum.

Third stage represents a first meeting, creating a powerful imprint upon the relationship between mother and baby. When both are undrugged and quiet, fully present and alert, new potentials are invoked, and we discover more about ourselves, and the sacred origins of our capacity to love.

References

Beer A. Fetal erythrocytes in maternal circulation of 155 Rh-negative women. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34,2:143-150
Botha M. Management of the umbilical cord during labour. S.A. J Obstet Gynecol 1968;August:30-33
Brinsden P, Clark A. Post partum haemorrhage after induced and spontaneous labour BMJ 1978 ;ii: 855-856
Darwin E. Zoonomia Vol III 3^rd ed. London 1801:302
Doolittle J, Moritz C. Obstet Gynecol 1966; 27:529
Garrison R. 1999 Personal communication
Gartner L. Breastfeeding, breastmilk and the jaundiced baby. Paper presented at The Passage to Motherhood Conference CAPERS 1998, Brisbane.
Gilbert L, Porter W, Brown V. Postpartum haemorrhage- a continuing problem. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987 ;94:67-71
Grajeda R, Perez-Escamilla R, Dewey K. Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord improves hematologic status of Guatemalan infants at 2 mo of age. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:425-431
Gunther M. The transfer of blood between baby and placenta in the minutes after birth. Lancet 1957;i:1277-1280
Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long term effects of Cesarean section: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1569-1574
Inch S. Birth Rights: what every parent should know about childbirth in hospital. New York, Random House 1984
Jacobsen B.Perinatal origin of adult self-destructive behavior. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987;76:364-371
Jacobsen B. Opiate addiction in adult offspring through possible imprinting after obstetric treatment. BMJ 1990;301:1067-1070
Kinmond S, Aitchison T, Holland B, et al. Umbilical cord clamping and preterm infants: a randomised trial. BMJ 1993:306 (6871):172-175
Landau D. Hyaline membrane formation in the newborn: hematogenic shock as a possible etiologic factor. Missouri Med 1953;50:183
Lapido O.Management of the third stage of labour with particular reference to reduction of feto-maternal transfusion. BMJ 1971 18 March:721-3
Linderkamp O. Placental transfusion: determinants and effects. Clinics in Perinatology 1982;9:559-592
McKenzie I. Induction of labour and postpartum haemorrhage. BMJ 1979, 17 March:750
Michaelson K, Milman N, Samuelson G.A longitudinal study of iron status in healthy Danish infants: effects of early iron status, growth velocity and dietary factors. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:1035-1044
Morley G.M. Cord closure: can hasty clamping injure the newborn. OBG Management 1998;July:29-36
Odent, Michel. The Nature of Birth and Breastfeeding. Sydney: ACE Graphics, 1992
Odent, Michel. Birth and Beyond .Taped recording of a talk given at the Midwifery Today Conference, London, Sept 1998
Pearce, Joseph Chilton. Evolution’s End: Claiming the Potential of Our Intelligence. San Francisco, Harper San Francisco 1992
Peltonen T. Placental transfusion: advantage and disadvantage. Eur J Paediatr 1981;137:141-146
Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S. Active versus expectant management of the third stage of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1999. Oxford: Update Software.
Piscane A. Neonatal prevention of iron deficiency: placental transfusion is a cheap and physiological solution. (Editorial) BMJ 1996;312(7024):136-137
Raine A, Brennan P, Mednick S. Birth complications combined with early maternal rejection at age 1 year predispose to violent crime at age 18 years. Ach Gen Psych 1994;51:984-988
Rogers J, Wood J, McCandlish R, Ayers S, Truesdale A and Elbourne D. Active vs expectant management of the third stage of labour: the Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1998;351:693-699
Sorbe B. Active management of the third stage of labour : a comparison of oxytocin and ergometrine Obstet Gynecol1978;52,6:694-697
Usher R, Shepherd M, Lind J. The blood volume of the newborn infant and placental transfusion. Acta Paediatr Scand 1963;52:497-512Walsh S. Maternal effects of early and late clamping of the umbilical cord. Lancet 1968, 11 May:997
Weinstein L, Farabow W, Gusdon J. Third stage of labor and transplacental hemmorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37,1:90-93
World Health Organisation. Care in Normal Birth: a practical guide. Geneva, World Health Organisation 1996

Attachment 2

Lotus Birth- A Ritual for our times

Copyright Dr Sarah J. Buckley

A previous version of this article was published in the book Lotus Birth, Shivam Rachana, Greenwood Press, 2000.

Lotus birth is the practice of leaving the umbilical cord uncut, so that the baby remains attached to his/her placenta until the cord naturally separates at the umbilicus- exactly as a cut cord does- at 3 to 10 days after birth. This prolonged contact can be seen as a time of transition, allowing the baby to slowly and gently let go of his/her attachment to the mother's body.

Although we have no written records of cultures which leave the cord uncut, many traditional peoples hold the placenta in high esteem. For example, Maori people from New Zealand bury the placenta ritually on the ancestral marae, and the Hmong, a hill tribe from South East Asia, believe that the placenta must be retrieved after death to ensure physical integrity in the next life: a Hmong baby's placenta is buried inside the house of its birth.

Lotus Birth is a new ritual for us, having only been described in chimpanzees before 1974, when Clair Lotus Day- pregnant and living in California- began to question the routine cutting of the cord . Her searching led her to an obstetrician who was sympathetic to her wishes, and her son Trimurti was born in hospital and taken home with his cord uncut. Lotus Birth was named by, and seeded through Clair to Jeannine Parvati Baker in the US and Shivam Rachana in Australia, who have both been strong advocates for this gentle practice.

Since 1974, many babies have been born this way, including babies born at home and in hospital, on land and in water, and even by caesarean section. Lotus birth is a beautiful and logical extension of natural childbirth, and invites us to reclaim the so-called third stage of birth, and to honour the placenta, our baby’s first source of nourishment.

I am a New Zealand GP (family MD in America), and have 4 children born at home in my adopted country, Australia. I have experienced Lotus birth with my second and subsequent children, after being drawn to it during my second pregnancy through contact with Shivam Rachana at the Centre for Human Transformation in Yarra Glen, near Melbourne. Lotus birth made sense to me at the time, as I remembered my time training in GP obstetrics, and the strange and uncomfortable feeling of cutting through the gristly, fleshy cord that connects baby to placenta and mother. The feeling for me was like cutting through a boneless toe, and it felt good to avoid this cutting with my coming baby.

Through the CHT I spoke with women who had chosen this for their babies, and experienced a beautiful post-natal time. Some women also described their Lotus-Birth child's self-possession and completeness. Others described it as a challenge, practically and emotionally. Nicholas, my partner, was concerned that it might interfere with the magic of those early days, but was happy to go along with my wishes.

Zoe, our second child, was born at home on the 10th of September 1993. Her placenta was, unusually, an oval shape, which was perfect for the red velvet placenta bag that I had sewn. Soon after the birth, we wrapped her placenta in a cloth nappy, then in the placenta bag, and bundled it up with her in a shawl that enveloped both of them. Every 24 hours, we attended to the placenta by patting it dry, coating it liberally with salt, and dropping a little lavender oil onto it. Emma, who was 2, was keen to be involved in the care of her sister's placenta.

As the days passed, Zoe's cord dried from the umbilical end, and became thin and brittle. It developed a convenient 90 degree kink where it threaded through her clothes, and so did not rub or irritate her. The placenta, too, dried and shrivelled due to our salt treatment, and developed a slightly meaty smell, which interested our cat!

Zoe’s cord separated on the 6th day, without any fuss; other babies have cried inconsolably or held their cord tightly before separation. We planted her placenta under a mandarin tree on her first birthday, which our dear friend and neighbour Annie later dug up and put in a pot when we moved interstate. She told us later that the mandarins from the tree were the sweetest she had ever tasted.

Our third child, Jacob Patrick, was born on the 25th September 1995, at home into water. Jacob and I stayed in the water for some time after the birth, so we floated his placenta in a plastic ice-cream carton (with the lid on, and a corner cut out for the cord) while I nursed him. This time, we put his placenta in a sieve to drain for the first day. I neither dressed nor carried Jacob at this time, but stayed in a still space with him, while Nicholas cared for Emma, 4, and Zoe, 2. His cord separated in just under 4 days, and I felt that he drank deeply of the stillness of that time.

His short "breaking forth" time was perfect because my parents arrived from New Zealand the following day to help with our household. He later chose a Jacaranda tree under which to bury his placenta at our new home in Queensland.

My fourth baby, Maia Rose, was born in Brisbane, where Lotus birth is still very new, on 26

July 2000. We had a beautiful birth at home, and my intuition told me that her breaking forth time would be short. I decided not to treat her placenta at all, but kept it in a sieve over a bowl in the day time, and in the placenta bag at night. The cord separated in just under 3 days and, although it was a cool time of year, it did get become friable and rather smelly. (Salt treatment would have prevented this). Maia’s placenta is still in our freezer, awaiting the right time for burial, and I broke off a piece of her dried cord to give to her when she is older.

My older children have blessed me with stories of their lives before birth, and have been unanimously in favour of not cutting the cord- especially Emma, who remembered the unpleasant feeling of having her cord cut, which she describes as being “painful in my heart”. Zoe, at five years of age, described being attached to a ‘love-heart thing’ in my womb and told me “When I was born, the cord went off the love-heart thing and onto there (the placenta) and then I came out.” Perhaps she experienced her placenta in utero as the source of nourishment and love.

Lotus birth has been, for us, an exquisite ritual which has enhanced the magic of the early post natal days. I notice an integrity and self-possession with my lotus-born children, and I believe that lovingness, cohesion, attunement to nature, trust, and respect for the natural order have all been imprinted on our family by our honouring of the placenta, the Tree of Life, through Lotus Birth.

__________________________________________________________________

Protect Babies and Mothers Too Petition : www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

(1) References: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm (Listed are just some of the books studied are listed. It is a start of information known for a very long time).

(2) Home Page : Table of Contents : www.lotusbirth.com

Medical Web Site: www.cordclamping.com

Contact DONNA, MOTHER AND GRANDMOTHER: dyoung@pris.ca

This web site was updated: May 19, 2004