Junior High Book, Reproduction, The Cycle of Life, p98, 1982, correctly directs delayed clamping of the umbilical
cord and reveals the medical persons sell the placentas to drug companies and to research with no informed
consent.
Junior High Book, Reproduction, The Cycle of Life, p98, 1982, correctly directs delayed clamping of the umbilical cord and reveals the medical persons sell the placentas to drug companies and to research with no informed consent.
In comparing this older book, my research was able to compare the teaching
of older students, at the University levels. The
2003 10 th Edition, Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, promotes the philosophy
of pragmantism...if it is practical to take
the baby's blood, so why not do it.
consent. Comments of Donna Young (Revised March 2, 2004).
Are students being directly or indirectly taught to be amoral?
To quote from: page 1076, 2003, 10 edition of the University textbook purchased by the students, Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, by Gerard J. Tortora, Bergen Community College and Sandra Reynolds Grabowski, Purdue University, publisher, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. WIE ISBN 0=471-22472-3.
"Pharmaceutical companies use human placentas as a source of hormones, drugs, and blood: portions
of
placentas are also used for burn coverage. The placenta and umbilical cord blood can be frozen
to provide a future
source of pluripotent stem cells, for example, to repopulate red bone marrow following radiotherapy
for cancer."
This sounds so noble, to do so many good things with human tissue. But
they failed to mention about waiting for all pulsation
of the cord to cease. They failed to direct permission. They failed to mention that some persons
have a belief not to receive
blood nor to donate blood or tissues to be used as transplants, to others, either. The students
were not being informed of the
choice to discard by burning, a failure to allow those who will be in the medical services to "assume"
they had a right to organs
without informed choice or consent.
But there is also another thought here, too, not mentioned to the students,
as to whose property of the contents of the placenta,
and why was it likely early cord clamped, as they mention placenta blood used?
The placenta blood with the hormones in the blood and many other nutrients
not reminded of the students, was the property of
the baby's. They did not mention law or ethics and duty to show respect to the newborn child, the neonate,
a citizen. God's
design intended for all the nutrients in the placenta to be transfused into the baby's expanding lungs. Each cell to take from the
blood stream that which it specifically needed.
Who is to say the babies with hormonal deficiencies were not caused
this shortage from the time they were distressed and
deprived of 20 to 50 percent total blood volume (1) (1) The Society of Obstetrician and
Gynecologists of Canada, Policy #71,
December 1998.
The statement of the older Junior Secondary Schoo, 1982, twenty-one years ago,
the harvesting was likely going on, stated:
To quote from Reproduction,The Cycle of Life, p 98:
". . .Once the head and shoulders have emerged the rest of the birth proceeds rapidly. The baby's body is finally free of its nine-month-long home. The pearly blue umbilical cord still links child to womb, sending him blood from the placenta. The doctor will wait until the cord has stopped pulsating before clamping it above the baby's abdomen and severing it ." (See below what they do with the placentas).
It the continued...the practical or pragmatic use of the placenta, as an empty organ, to quote:
P 98, "After the placenta is delivered, the doctor
will examine it to make sure it is intact. It is then discarded
or sold to
companies for use in research or beauty products
."
Reproduction, The Cycle of Life, by Karen Jensen and the
Editors of U.S. News Books, page 98. ISBN 0-89193-606-8,
ISBN 0-89193-666-1 (school ed.) The Middle School has used these books since 1983.
__________________________
Please consider this Petition that protests "active management and Clamping off the pulsating umbilical
cord, endangering
babies and violating a duty of trust to them:
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION TO PROTECT BABIES AND THERE MOTHERS, TOO:
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.
We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.
OTHER COMMENTS AND CONCERNS:
When doctors and nurses and midwives are clamping a pulsating cord, they are intending then the harvesting
of the child, and
without, in most cases informed consent or means for the parents to protect their baby.
The parents, trusting the medical persons, and this is midwives too, in homebirths, simply are not informed
in adequate time on
no clamping of the cord. They cannot then give informed consent, or be informed of no detaching
of the cord or placenta needs
to be done, ever, unless the cord tore or for a c-section, involving placenta previa.
We can see the motive why the doctors went away from the Pioneer's method, of years ago not to detach
the cord, they have
likely "always" been grinding up the placenta after draining off the blood, the labs and nurses
keeping this in secret and the Ethics
Policy Board of most hospitals. The public just was not kept informed.
It was on February 25, 2003 that I was given permission to review the Library and Biology Books for Grades 7, 8, and 9, at the local Junior High School, Dawson Creek, BC. There is quite a difference in information, at least that time, they were quizzing students what did they think, but leading them with bias of the placenta of all what persons did...and leading them to think what is more practical...to use it for science or eat, or burn it? This was the first evidence to rumors I had heard the hospitals no longer burned the placentas, but sold them and drained the placenta blood from the trapped blood in the placenta.
Now, it was December 2003, that I borrowed a more current 2003 textbook, the one used by the nurses, as said above. How are the values changing? In back in 1982, the teachers were leading the students to assume it is okay to give the DNA information in the placenta and blood tissues, as the placenta completed it job, so why not donate to someone who can use it. That part is good, the placenta completing the job, being totally empty of blood, so we are just dealing with the placenta tissue? And what should we do with them, use it for science, or burn it?
But the students were not directed to think "Privacy of genetic information,
DNA. Who is to say that some corrupted
researcher cannot use the information in a negative way, and target races, or by color, or even by race...harm? What was the law
of ownership, the hospital, the nurses the doctor, and who was receiving compensation for the organ
used in research or
cosmetics?
In the current 2003 textbook, the instructors of the textbook failed to inform
the students to correctly inform that the placenta
blood continues to transfuse into the infant, into the child's expanding lungs, for the lungs to take
over the gas exchanges. The
transfusion can take as long as 20 minutes for drugged or impaired babies, or the premature babies. Lungs hold a lot of blood.
This information was missing from this textbook, as to my research.
On page 754, of Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, Figure 21.31, the textbook gives a fetal circulation charge and the difference between the neonate adult circulation. It, however, fails to relate that the placenta has up to 60 percent total blood volume to be transfused into the child's expanding lungs, needed to do the gas exchange the placenta formally did.
It fails to mention in that area of circulation topic the nutrients of value
to the child that will be deprived when they acknowledge
clamping off the cord...but not mentioning that is not a necessary procedure, merely cosmetic. They
do not tell the students, that
of the endangering of interruption of the circulation system, and death by shock of low blood volume
and pressure. Why not?
This textbooks does not give ethics, and the law for equal protection of the
timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord,
allowing for the babies to be unethically harvested by early umbilical cord clamping, not set by clinical
studies, babies live if they
are only given 30-seconds clamping. The placenta blood containing up to 60 percent total blood
volume then is drained off, the
parents none-the-wiser, because they are uneducated the blood is needed for the child's expanding lungs,
to prevent lung
damage and no cell is a healthy cell by any amount of oxygen and blood deprivation.
This blood, legally, ought to have been allowed to be in the infant/owner. (See
Chow-Case-Law, "Blood disappears from
placenta . . list of contents).
_____________________________
OTHER RESEARCH:
(NOTE: A private letter from the College of Physicians and Surgeons
of British Columbia, Canada, to myself, had correctly
stated in 1999, that they declared the correct care of the placenta and cord was that no babies were
being harmed or
endangered because "all" doctors waited until all pulsation in the umbilical cord ceased before
clamping/cutting.
Yet, in Policy #71, December 1998 and in Policy #89, May 2000, all doctors
were being encouraged into a new trend of
early clamping (30-second or less) or immediate clamping directed by the Society of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists of
Canada, (SOGC).
SOGC, when letters were written them, of concern and the illogic of the policies,
were unwilling to change their policies. No
doctor from Canada, of past training or of ethical back bone, complained about those policies, nor did
any midwife invited to join
their association.
In my opinion the SOGC were being criminally negligent as to influencing others
with this policy, and allowing the doctors to be
licensed under this misdirection, in every Province and Territory in Canada. This is even
though the average to large babies
survive the assault. The baby is needlessly weakened, and some may die.
The author of www.lotusbirth.com was the only person, SOGC stated, to have written
them letters that such policies were
endangering "all" babies the clamp was put on a pulsating cord, when the cord was firm, red,
and pulsating. Rather, the cord
being white/silver, limp and not pulsating and the child's lips and tongue not blue, if the cord is
clamped and cut, at all.
There is evidence, dating as far back as 1801, doctors have known of the endangering
of internal damages to brain, heart,
lungs, and other internal organs by oxygenated blood deprivation. It is witnessed in other
mammals as well, when such
experimentation has gone on.
EUTHANASIA OF SMALL BABIES UNDER 5-POUNDS:
I complained, in my own home town, when smaller babies died, and no investigation
of coroner's report were done. This was
in my own home town of a baby under 5-pounds, (just shy of 3-pounds). The baby was early clamped,
and not investigated when
it lived only 14 minutes. This male child was born and died on October 8, 2000. All government
officials and RCMP allowed for
no investigation, including the Coroner's Divisions, local, and at the Burnaby Head Quarters.
The parents were not educated to know their duties to ask for a criminal investigation,
or were settling out of court for a private
settlement for a wrongful death, and therefore corrections are not made for the benefit of other babies. Only open trials civil or
criminal influence the need of change, and not civil settlements, if one were taken.
No one cared that a perfectly normal baby was likely put down, alleged for small
size, but really for small baby's greater content
for stem cells and organ transplant tissues. If it was not for this trend of our society, the
child would likely be alive and well today,
had it not been for insufficient blood in his lungs to be able to continue to breathe. This statement
has not been denied as to
cause of death. It is believed that the parents are fearful to complain about the medical care we are
receiving, even if babies will
die for their silence and other babies continue to be injured.
We are living very troubling times in a Canadian Democracy, in deed, that prevention
is not taught our up-coming parents and
doctors and nurses on the facts of the reproduction, and the fetal to adult circulation systems and
that best practice possible is to
leave the pulsating cord alone, as we see in the birth of other mammals.
SILENCE BY MAJOR NEWS MEDIAS:
All major news medias have refused coverage on this child-abuse issue. Today,
there has been a 70 percent increase of the
population now using the internet for free-lance news stories. The trend is not to trust
the major news medias for truthful stories.
The major news medias are being controlled by large corporation interests, and that includes
the private medical research in
stem cells, but also they are getting government grants set aside for stem cell research. Where
does the government think the
stem cells are coming from, dead babies, or aborted babies, only? NO.
The various government agents and hospitals know very well what the doctors
and their nurses are doing and why? The
government at various levels have involved in this cover-up because they know the average to large babies
do not die, when
anemic. They are just weakened for 6 weeks to 6 months, some longer. Some of these
babies will be made weaker after
vaccinations in an anemic condition. Babies are not routinely checked for anemia at the hospital
or home births.
There is doubt on the ethics and unprejudiced coverage on the Canadian Broadcast
Corporation, CBC, too. The Federal
Minister of Heritage and the Ombudsman of CBC would not investigate the stem cell stories and failing
to warn the public what is
going on.
On this issue of immediate cord clamping, which would take one story for all of Canada to be informed what the doctors have been doing, and the blind and withheld information to the medical nurses who assist in the clamping.
The news media, if they did a factual story based in facts of science and showing
on film what is being done, would help to
change the endangering trend of taking the new born citizen's blood by early cord clamping. The
news media can find out the
truth at any major hospital, anywhere in Canada or the United States, what the doctors are doing.
They have protected the doctors regardless of Rule of Law that the doctors can
be charged with negligent performance of their
perceived professional duties and obligations to do best practice possible, least risk of harm and not
to exploit any person
because of their age, or mental or physical disadvantages.
The child cannot give informed consent to donate blood, regardless how much
society thinks medical research is a worthy
cause. Or that another person needs the baby's blood, when the baby has rights of his/her own
to have their own blood to be a
blue-ribbon-baby, nature intended the child to be without endangering to the baby, to be weakened by
blood deprivation.
The procedure imposed on the child must be for his/her benefit, not another's. The duty of the parent and medical persons
and Courts is to the child's protection and security of person and equal protection.
The Royal Alexander Hospital in Edmonton Alberta is one such hospital
using deprived blood trapped in the Placenta for
research. They have done this hasty clamping and taking of the placenta blood (without informed
parent's consent) with the
knowledge and approval by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, and Gary Mar, of Health
and Wellness.
All continued to do as they pleased and the parents were none-the-wiser of taking
home anemic and weaker babies, whom
they then subject to early toxic vaccinations. These babies were the most vulnerable to be autistic.
Canada has over 200,000 autistic babies, and I allege the cause is multi-factor, starting with drugging the mother during labor and followed with early cord clamping and the babies predisposition to being pushed over the edge by endangering vaccinations with preservatives of mercury and aluminum, some injected at birth, some before the child was 3-months old. See Yurko Project at the end of this article and links.
All other hospitals are keeping the lid on what they actually do. It is no benefit
to say they burned the blood, rather then admitting
they took the baby's blood for stem cell research. How many decades has this being going on? I
would think for the last three
generations of women birthing in hospitals.
Whatever the doctor, the lab and the hospital did with the deprived placenta
blood, the blood was best to be transfused inside
the baby, not burned or sent to research.
Whatever was done, there was a breach of Constitutional Rights to the child
for equal protection and security of person. There
was breach of trust for the parents to have been in control so the doctor and nurse were not able to
endanger "their" baby.
INTERNET OFFERS ACCESS TO MEDICAL RESEARCH:
Research available on the internet indicates some doctors are draining the full placenta of some 180 ccs of blood, or more, maybe less if the baby is small. The general collection reported by blood banks is 4 to 6 ounces. A nine-pound baby only makes 10 ounces of blood.
This taking of the placenta blood, is mostly done while the placenta remains
in the birth canal. This keeps the blood warm
and it is easy to flow into collection tubes or bags. This is because the warm blood flows
faster, within 7-minutes, if the placenta
is kept warm by keeping the placenta in the birth canal. Or, the blood drained while the placenta
is still attached to the womb.
If the placenta is quickly expelled, the draining out of the placenta, then
takes 20-minutes, when the placenta is cold. To do so
by the latter method is not time efficient for a busy medical business person/doctor/staff. But
the latter means the draining of the
placenta is concealed from the parent's observation.
See:
www.123-baby-birth.com
for more research on the internet of taking placenta blood for stem cells and from sick babies,
too. No baby is being spared of taking the placenta blood that belongs to the infant/owner.
The cells of a sick baby were involved in the Yurko project. One can see why it was necessary to convict the father, Alan Yurko, for the Shaken Baby Syndrome, because it would not be wise to take cells from the baby, if it was sick. They did do that. But to say it was from a well baby, killed by shaken baby syndrome, means the cells, and brain tissues were then believed to be used in research and for transplants. They could not ethically take the brain cells, heart, and other organs or have used the placenta blood, if they baby was sick.
MULTI-FACTORS OF DAMAGED CHILDREN, LEADING TO AUTISTIC BABIES:
* Drugging mothers during labor and during the baby's birth with oxytocins, pitocins, and gels
and creams that assimilate into the
baby's blood stream.
* Flat on the back birth positions and/or semi-sitting birth positions. Bruises the baby's
head and causes ribs broken and collar
bones.
* Mothers being poked and massaged and having episiotomy, and instrument deliveries of their babies
(forceps) (vacuums),
increased c-sections, followed with immediate cord clamping. All babies can have the no
clamping or cutting of the umbilical
cord, except in rare cases of when the cord tore or for placenta previa. All other reasons, such
as cord around the neck, short
cord, to revive the baby, are dubious explanations and need further examination before a Court of law
that safer methods were
options. (See the Chow-case-law at www.123-baby-birth.com)
* Early and Immediate cord clamping, causes anemia.
* Early vaccinations and insertion of needles into the pulsating vein, drawing out samples and
heel pricking drawing out blood
from the baby for PKU tests, and pH tests. Some of these tests, if consented to be done, can be
done by urine tests. Injections
of Vitamin K.
Most vaccinations have been preserved with questionable preservatives and trace elements.
HOW TO PROTECT THE BABY:
Have warm water births. All births are messy, whether the baby is born in the water or out of the tub. And I say, so what if the water gets dirty. Many women deal with that by education. Get out of the water for a dry birth, as long as the midwife or doctor are signed by contract to leave the cord alone and will not make the woman or child vulnerable if the mother and child are easily assessable to their past training of early clamping of the cord.
Many of these professionals have been making excuses to clamp a pulsating cord:
short cord, cord around the neck,
compromised child. All these babies can be aided on the pulsating cord. Parents must
be made aware. Charge these medical
persons with assault and battery if they "clamp" your baby's pulsating cord and imposed
that without telling you no clamping is
your right to have, and not cutting, at all.
Video your child's birth, from beginning to end. Do not shut the
video off for any reason. C-section births can be
videoed. The medical policies allows for films and videos of any medical procedure. Arrange
the videoing long before the
expected birth of the child with a professional person who will not faint to film a birth.
Request for hand's off maternity care services.
Leave the umbilical cord alone, no touching no handling. Leave the placenta
alone when expelled. No rush to do anything to
the child, even if the baby requires an operation. Babies have been operated on still attached
to the placenta and cord. Some
even in the womb. Keep the baby as a sealed unit. Put the placenta in a diaper and keep
close to baby. In this way the baby
has no hernia naval infections or blood infections. The cord is off in 3-days time, compared to
over 8 days to two weeks for a cut
cord.
You do not need to allow any injections of your baby, either. Be firm. Parents must know their legal rights. Make any medical
person take you to court, if they think a Judge will approve of their demands on "your" baby
and how the mother requests
protection of no risk taking to her, or her baby.
You might make a complaint of the hospital if they are allowing any reasons
for early cord clamping, other then (1) cord tore or
(2) placenta previa. Make the hospital Administration Board for failure to have best practice
possible their directives for
maternity care, and that is natural births and allowing for water births being the mother's choice,
and no clamping of the cord.
See Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declarations at this website for the lotus birth,
no clamping or cutting of the cord.
See Autistic Children and Cost to our society in every Province across Canada,
www.lotusbirth.com Parents are now seeking
financial compensation to help assist in the education of compromised and impaired children. Many
such impaired children
were the result of needless birth traumas, needlessly imposed on the child because the mother and father
have been deceived
when they take biology courses, and prenatal classes what to request in a birth plan of "their"
baby.
Most important facts are failed to be told them as stated above, how multi-factors
of careless medical practices are causing
internal damages to millions of children, around the world. That is causing a steady repeat
medical business for higher costs of
education and medical costs to those impaired, needlessly, and lack of proper training to medical persons.
It is likely every child that has delayed learning, slow or no speech, hearing,
vision problems, all can be reviewed to probable
cause of improper birth techniques of the child.
COMMISSIONED INQUIRIES ARE NEEDED FOR MATERNITY MATTERS:
As we had an Inquiry on the Canadian Blood Supply , we need this to be done for maternity matters on the issue of drugging of the mothers and early cord clamping on the majority of babies, and where their blood went. Perhaps, criminal charges will be taken on those responsible and did nothing, and that is what followed the Inquiry on the Canadian Blood Supply. Criminal charges have been taken on those executives of drug companies and the Canadian Red Cross, Canadian Doctors, as well as American Doctors are charged with endangering the public, such as Section 180 of the CCC, others under bodily assault and injury.
I see the need to also investigate maternity matters for those training the
doctors, nurses, midwives, surgeons, doulas, and the
9-1-1 medics, to endanger the child by early cord clamping, when the two evidences of need, are not
present (1) cord tore (2)
placenta previa. Both needing an investigation to cause those situations to arise. In any
case, the duty would be to give back the
baby his/her deprived blood if the child was early clamped.
We must investigate those in charge of directing false maternity care services, at all levels of government and education, and the misuse of taxpayer's money for false information in textbooks and in prenatal classes. We must investigate who in Canada allowed it, organized and directed it, starting with the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and the Faculties of Medicine and the senior doctors training newly trained doctors at each hospital.
So far, by written policy, the experts, the Obstetricians and Gynecologists
in the United States and in Canada have set the
wrongful policies. ACOGS Policy #216, November 1995, was followed until it was cancelled in January
2002.
Their executives and memberships, except those who have dissented and can prove it, must be all accountable, in a similar fashion drug companies and their executives where held accountable for sicknesses by their products and failing to disclose the blood supply was unsafe. (See RCMP Blood Task Force for current charges on doctors).
We must have confidence in our medical persons and our medical institutions
providing the consumer with medical services
and the safety of any drug offered to a pregnant lady. All drugs cross the placenta, most instantly.
EDUCATION AND FALSE INFORMATION NOT CORRECTED:
We must also investigate the false statements in the Biology books, at all levels. The Biology books (see References at end
of the List of Contents), are directing a medical procedure of early or immediate cord clamping. Some
of the instructors are not
informing the students information in the Chapters assigned for reading the information was false, and
why it was false. The false
biology books gave no disclosure of any reference to any medical doctor or research taking responsibilities
for the quotations.
This is when the textbooks, videos or films were directing a medical directive of early clamping on
a pulsating cord for "human"
babies.
It is not known if the Biology teachers were falsely educating the medical persons,
or if they actually had a direction from a
medical society or association or college or University directing misguidance that I deem a science/medical
hoax.
However, the Biology hoax, except for need of clamping (1) cord tore or (2)
placenta previa, was intended to give a policy and
if followed was to be used as a defense that the medical persons failing to report it as a hoax, would
be excused from civil and
criminal liabilities.
A judge would decide, if that were an appropriate excuse for following a practice,
by any professional person, and this is
known to be false information with dubious debates, mostly internal within the medical circles, kept
secret from most of the public
and what the dissents are for not doing early clamping, for the logical reasons, it is not seen to be
done in nature of natural
mammal births.
The information was logically known false since 1801 and observed in nature,
to this very day. Time does not change facts
observable. See Dr. Erasmus Darwin's Quotation, this website.
What other reasons would false information be put in any medical book, or policy,
or Biology book other then to serve as a
defense. The false teaching has been creating thousands to millions of damaged children. This increases higher costs for
education and repeat medical needs. Millions of babies have been wrongfully denied their fullest
potential to have genius cells,
many of their brain cells damaged needlessly, at birth by hasty umbilical cord clamping, and causing
anemia in babies,
recklessly.
FEARS, TRENDS, TRADITIONS ON EARLY CORD CLAMPING OUTSIDE OF EMPIRICAL SCIENCE:
If there were fear of too thick of blood or too much blood, was that fear based in the drugs given the mother to do the early clamping before the facts were tested and the cord clamped immediately, testing after the fact?
The proper treatment of any sickness, after testing, and the treatment for jaundice
of any adult is not blood-letting. Why then
would any doctor or nurse, or a practical nurse say they are doing blood deprivation of 20 to 50 percent
total blood deprivation for
the "fear" of jaudice, in the child.
This is when we do not drain out 50 percent blood to treat an adult with the
same condition, after "testing" and confirming a
disease was present. Many questions must be answered before a qualified Inquiry or criminal judge
of abuse and assault and
battery on babies.
Experts are expected to think things out and to know better then to follow
a hoax. That is why they are experts and are paid so
well. So can an expert have a defense of ignorance? I think not.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of every Province were given the mandate to protect the public. I have not seen that evidence on this issue of Maternity Matters. The Justice system must allow an Inquiry and charge those most negligent when this was brought to their attention it was happening in the Province of British Columbia, when they assured me in 1999, it was not happening.
Did CPSBC lie? Or did CPSBC not care to protect the public, in British
Columbia, as they contracted for under the
Professional's Act? And what about the Hospital Act and what went on on their premises and paid
for the BC Medical Plan?
Most births have a packaged flat fee, unless their are complications that they bill extra for, blood
collection, oxygen
administration, blood transfusion, injections, and all drive the cost of maternity costs, that would
not be so in home births, of
natural care.
What about the higher costs of education costs, $65,000 per year, per sick child
for an autistic child. And, the medical costs
to escalate to epidemics of autistic children, with one of the probable causes is early cord clamping,
oxygenated and blood
deprived sick babies, many now adults.
These compromised children were normal looking, apparently healthy, but internal
damaged. All records of early clamping
failed to be kept by the doctors and the nurse. Why if they were acting to do a benefit to the
child, why not disclose it unless they
were concealing evidence of probable injury to all children this was done to?
That is likely well over 50 percent of the population, injured, some very subtle,
others more serious. And, almost assured as to
the statistics of costs for revival of children, now alleged to be one in sixteen. Any child needing
revival is an compromised child
to the degree of blood and oxygen deprivation. See the reports at the List of
Contents, www.lotusbirth.com.
Also check out continued blood letting after the original early clamping of
some 10 to 15 percent total blood deprivation every
2nd and 3rd day for premature babies, and those that die, are not investigated. In fact, most
deaths where a doctor or medical
person were present are not now being investigated by the Coroner's offices.
These websites below are of a sick child whose organs were taken after they
alleged the organs were fine by charging the
father with the Shaken Baby Syndrome. That was likely an excuse to use the baby's organs,
even the brain cells. The head was
smaller at death then at birth. How was that possible, unless the brain cells were taken through
the nasal passages and not
disclosed as the baby was believed brain damaged and revived.
The researchers or those wanting the cells for research could not use them,
ethically, if the baby was sick. They could justify to
use them if death was alleged by killing of the child by the father, now serving life in prison. He
alleges his innocence. Was he
set up by the failure to bring the facts of the child's death and vaccinations to Alan's original trial.
Do you think a new trial should be granted for the father? Or, the doctors
tried for negligence? Did the one doctor jeopardized
the child with 6 vaccinations to a known weakened baby, anemic, that the child had many problems, until
he stopped breathing,
was revived at the hospital, then later died? The father immediately charged with killing his
baby by shaking?
The mother was immediately asked/pressured to give up the baby's organs for
transplants and/or research. Things do not
seem right of this original trial in Florida and many doctors coming up with the same conclusion.
Read Dr. Al-Baayati's opinion and review? I bring up questions
this child's death was predictable as to his birth
difficulties, early clamping, use of oxytocins, and injections of toxic vaccinations all while the child
was yet anemic. The chances of
the baby getting the diseases he was being vacinated for were slim.
http://www.freeyurko.bizland.com/albayati1.html#section2
http://www.freeyurko.bizland.com/albayati2.html
_______________________________________________________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for : AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth. Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact: dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
