Anesthesia, Early Umbilical Cord Clamping, Apgar Scores, Remedial Learning & IQ Testing and Child Birth, what do they have in common?

Anesthesia, Early Umbilical Cord Clamping, Apgar Scores, Remedial Learning & IQ Testing and Child Birth, what do they have in common? The are linked to impaired children who were born by those women who had active management, rather than safe alternatives, warm water births, no drugs, and there babies not clamped from their lifeline, the umbilical cord.  Research and comments of Donna Young

A letter was sent to a group of professionals.  They are also concerned with the care and the treatment of the pregnant lady, that active management leads to compromised children. This has been speculated right back to 1801, the evidence is in the placenta, itself, containing over 50 percent of the baby's blood volume. Babies revived, survive, of course. It is not an intent to kill the child. Those children selected for early clamping have something the medical fields want, a particular, type of blood; or its culling of society, who shall be the fittest of all, perhaps.  Every other child, seems to be not up to the speed, it would be, if no interventions were being allowed on any baby, regardless whose baby it is, by color, by race, by religion, by blood type, by mixture race, by mental or physical disadvantages.

I took my research into  Anesthesia, IQ Testing, Apgar scores, and Private Schooling and the use of Remedial Reading books for all school children.  My theory is that the governments, at all levels, knew taking of the infants placenta blood, from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume, would impair the children. Where would the child be impaired?  Well, if the family had a weakness, early clamping would lead to that predisposition - heart problems, lungs, diabetic, learning and behavior problems, all would be enhanced.

No one knew, when they clamped a firm, red and pulsating cord, where the damage would be on that child.  It may be speech, or hearing, or vision, too.  The medical persons did know it was like the roll of the dice as to internal injuries, and limitations of full compactly of the brain cells. Here is my theory of how they assured that a population that should be healthy in Nations that have everything, are not, but give repeat business to the North American Medical Entrepreneurs.

No one has to spill the beans...as they all profit by doctors, either unethical, or incompetently trained on natural birth education and practice. They actually put out in written form, directives to "DO" immediate clamping on "all" babies born in North America and the greed of the Medical Entrepreneurs are taking it abroad to pick on the developing nations, to take their blood when they had safety in natural birth education and practice...now come the blood collectors to their nations, unaware, be aware the Northern Western Societies deceptive ways.  

FACTS:  This warning was spoken by Doris Haire .  This was back in 1997.  She had hopes to spare the developing nations. But would they do as the American and Canadian Governments, a be fair to the new born citizen.  Hardly likely, if the governments of those nations see Billions and Billions of dollars in harvesting the baby who lives. Truly,  a Magical Child...blood-let, at birth, yet lives.  That is the will of each living cell, to live, not die. But the child will never be all that he she might have been or to live the fullest of their life expectancy, and healthy, wealthy, and wise. Was she the first to speak out?

No.  There were studies by a Dr. Windle, in the 1960's.  And in the early 70's an Educator Joseph Chilton Pearce, wrote the Time Bomb Chapter, in particular, pages 48-50, where he revealed that drugs and immediate cord clamping impair any child this is done too. The masses of the public just were so blindly trusting of the medical doctors and the ethics of the nurse to report false medical practices, they felt if they came home with a living mother and a child, the doctor did a good job.  NOPE.  He or she caused medical interventions and the beginnings of many blood viruses that would be slow or fast acting, on both mother and the child.  

Facts:  Babies in Intensive Care Units, in September 29, 2002, Vancouver, BC, Canada, at the Children's Hospital, were under threat of a Superbug.  A dangerous microbe called MRSA - had come into their nursery, again.  In 1998, MRSA at the BC Children's Hospital killed two babies and infected 47.  If the babies had an unclamped cord, no superbug would get in any cut in the child's skin.  The MRSA lives on the skin of the babies, and any opening gives a chance for it to enter the blood stream. (Reference:  The Province, Sunday, September 29, 2002, Front Page and A3.

SEMESTERS IN USA AIDS STUDENTS TO LEARN, REMEDIAL READING FOR CANADIANS HELPED THEM:

My theory is that the United Stated brought in semesters to aid in teaching compromised babies.  The semester is a wise system.  It allows the children to concentrate on a few subjects, like two or three.  Whereas, in Canada, and in other countries, the birth-impaired children were were trying to keep pace with the rest of the class, struggle, many of them 2 or 3 development years behind their peers, who were not drugged or immediately umbilical cord clamped.  Many of these impaired children, who could learn to read and do some math, could not handle eight subject, at once.  Canada, and other nations brought in remedial reading books.

These are now collectors items.  They are the Dick and Jack, Spot and Puff readers. Colorful,  Simple subjects per page.  They were sight reading, none-phonetic, and the child learned most three ways:  Repetition, repetition, repetition.  This was aided by a strict rote school system.  These impaired but beautiful looking children were impaired by oxygen debt at birth, and the degree of damage was to revival of the child.  They would be anemic on top of their little blood, yet dealing with the drugs that crossed the placenta and damaged brain cells and caused nerve cell injury as well, to some.  

The rote system allowed for repetition for the child to learn to read, at least.  The expectation was to teach all children to be at least able to read at the grade 5 level. Today, these impaired and compromised children, drugged during birth and early umbilical cord clamped,  but not for any war cause, but rather  to collect their blood for research, into private companies. These private corporations, many who are the drug companies who put out the training manuals to the doctors, are also promoted on the stock exchange.  They and their policies being taught at most hospitals by the doctors who are business persons, are the link of those students now graduating not able to proficiently read, or do math.  And to the early cell death of cells that had to work doubly hard, from birth, taking over so many brain cells damaged and in the nervous system. Many of the victimized babies deficient in the hormones in the blood that was deprived them, including, enzymes, amino acids, white cells, red cells, stem cells, vitamins and minerals...essential to keep all cells functioning with out a drop in pressure or volume, as is in our design not to be interrupted of any circulation at birth.  

Of course, this is theory. Who of the education department would admit such a travesty and treason against the masses? But what good excuse do they have that they promote falseness in the health sciences, and in the biology textbooks, as if you go to the References , you will find them directing immediate cord clamping on the human baby. They do not dare say do that to any other placenta birthing mammal.  They know all other creatures must have their strength to be able to crawl or stand to get further nourishment from their mother.  Not so the human baby. We do the provisions, and do not know the baby is a heart, stroke and lung victim caused that way by drugs and early umbilical cord clamping.  Today, in British Columbia, those victimized babies are going to have to sue for civil damages, as to the cut backs in medical care for these babies to have any hope at all, and as compromised adults.

The hoax of immediate cord clamping as a false care and treatment to any child, whoever it is imposed on, was known since 1801, when the master of survival of the fittest's Grandfather, Dr. Eramus Darwin, said "Don't tie the cord until all pulsation ceases?"  It is just logical.  The facts of harm are in the evidence of the amount of blood trapped in the placenta, from 4 to 6 ounces of blood is the deprivation, if a 9-pound -full term, 9-month gestation, was immediately clamped. This baby only made a total amount of blood of 10 ounces, (300 ml).  And the doctor, the hospital, witnessed by the nurse and evident by the lab technician, gave the blood to another cause, not to the legal owner/infant, by duty of best practice possible least risk of harm.  The babies survive.  Many have to be revived.  In fact, the numbers may be more then studied, in Canada, which at that was one in sixteen.  Any revived child is going to be compromised.

It seems institutional births following the time saving and not hearing a women whimper, use active management, that causes the problems to both the fetus and the mother.  It seems, all the institutional births were considering was their goal was of active management, was time efficiency, timing the birth to suit the schedule of the doctor and the busy staff.  But they had the resources revive all, after their manipulation by a variety of cocktails of drugs, for their delivering the mother of her child.   Most mothers and babies are revived after active management.  It is not healthy.  It is not wise.

What are the alternatives?  A safe, warm water birth, in the home, unassisted, just the family present, as they did prior to the 1920's, and leaving the cord untied and uncut for a full immunity child, and no infections getting into a cut cord.  This was the simple births of long ago, long over due to get back to healthy natural birth education, and lock the doctor outside the door.  

This site has a link to John Shanahan, one of the few persons who challenged that impaired children, could learn to read, outside of the rote repetition that was needed for impaired children.  Shanahan, for his return to the phonetics that was alive a well, prior to 1945.  But getting children to figure out the words by sounds, brought him a challenge by the FTC attacked "Hooked on Phonics"   Shanahan, when you read his story, alleges the FTC did their best to bankrupt him.

There is a link, at the end,  to a Petition  that challenges Active Management.  Hardly ever, do Child Development centers ever go back to common factors of child birth.  They have questionnaire to skirt the issue of any direct or indirect link to another professional person.  Never, to they as a mother, did she accept drugs during her labor. If asked the common ones are morphine to relax and slow down the labor...this gets the staff prepared, in about 3 hours.  Then she is give a cocktail of oxytocins, IV, injections, creams, gels, pills...mixtures with morphine..  And these are followed with immediate cord clamping, during a vaginal birth or a c-section birth.

APGAR SCORE THE BABIES FIRST TEST:

The child will have a low first Apgar Score, many teachers now wanting to see them.  The mothers are often not given the "first" test of their baby, but the revived test, when the baby is stabilized to get 8 or 9, sometimes, even a 10.  How well the children learn, as to their struggles, will be to their individual "will" to succeed, and the means of the parents to give infancy reading, or tutoring, for their child. Their first clue to give infancy reading, that I share is simple to do, my theory, is if the mother took any drugs, even during the labor, such as oxytocin.

Oxytocin is a common drug, a gold mine for the drug companies. This is because most women are imposed on to receive this drug, even if they requested a drugless birth.  This is because the doctors actually or may or do excuse their use of it, and midwives, too, as alleging  it is this drug that stops bleeding.  I doubt that.  I challenge that, for I believe Oxytocin, actually risks causing more severe bleeding by harsher contraction of the placenta, and may have damaged the womb, by severe contractions, during birth.  That it may mean the mother may never ever carry another child full term.  The truth of the hormone that seals torn blood vessels are platelets and they release another hormone called serotonin.  

TO REITERATE:

• There may be a connection in teaching methods for children who were knowingly impaired during childbirth, most likely by drugs and early cord clamping.  The early cord clamping by "trends" that seem to come and go.  Remedies were implemented but not necessarily prevention of cause.  Why not?

• From the 1930's to the 1950's, the government had assured most school children to graduate with the ability to read at the grade 5 reading level.  The means of that assurance, I believe, was repetition of whole words, rather then the phonetic studies by using the controlled method of using exclusively the Dick & Jane, Sally, Spot and Puff remedial reading books. I, personally, being a victim of such teaching whole word means to learn, do not recommend whole word repetition without the phonetics being taught along with sight reading.  Both can be learned together.  I recommend Infancy reading.  (See list of contents).  

• The control of the readers and method of teaching, I believe, was likely the reasons children up to the 1950's were not encouraged to attend the elementary school libraries until about grade 4, or age 9.  That was true of my elementary school experience.

• These school children had no other books for the younger grade children to learn the phonetics. Today, these easy reading books are prevalent to help parents teach their own children to read from infancy, onward.  That is highly recommended for the impaired or uncompromised child, from birth.  

• Wise parents know how to prepare a child to learn reading easily, including the phonetic system. Steps are given at the end.All public schools used these Dick and Jane books.  They are now actually collectors items. But most schools burned the books.

• Many of the students, from these books, were graduating with poor reading and spelling abilities and poor vocabularies from whole word repetition teaching that were void of the phonetics.  Many children could not pronounce many words, and avoided them in written essays.

• Many of the children from sight reading only, could not even use a Dictionary to help themselves.  This was because they were not grounded in the phonetics of the word they wanted to spell.  

• My theory is the governments were informed the drugs used for pregnant women were causing mental deficiencies in the babies.  Therefore, to deal with a medical problem, to theorize, the powers that were, simply modified the school means to educate brain-handicapped children, but normal in appearance.  

• These were the babies whose mother's accepted drugs during birth.  The children then were deprived of oxygen and vitamin and minerals in the blood, by under one-minute early cord clamping.  Babies undrugged and left on the cord until all full pulsation in the cord ceased, thrived.  As do most unassisted normal births.

• These drugged and hasty clamped babies were anemic and jaundiced at birth.  Their blood chemistry was disrupted causing more dead blood cells.  Many would have more serious fates of sickness, cancers, and tumors, and internal organ problems, muscle and bone problems, and growth problems, to name a few of the disorders medically caused.  

• Unnatural birth process causes the child's tiny organs the kidneys, spleen and liver, to be overloaded with all the destroyed cells by the medical drugs given the mother during labor.  Why did doctors give the mother's drugs.

•  Many doctors simply felt it was better to quite the mother then hear her moan.  They thought drugs were the answer as they controlled her birth experience, without family or friends with her, or her freedom to move around during the labor stages, or to have warm water baths and showers, even to birth the child in the tub.

• Of course, this is all theory but food for thought that school curriculums change and perhaps adjust to whatever are the trends in medical care and treatment of the pregnant women.  The blood of the infant, trapped in the placenta, was never actually burned but, I theorize, was used in science research and experimented on the war fields.  

• The mothers were not informed of the amount of blood deprivation to the child.  The lab technicians kept the secret of the doctors, who likely sent the placentas to the pathology department, in most hospitals.  

• Most hospitals likely had their own fractionator and/or centrifugal equipment to separate placenta blood into the many components of blood tissue.  The blood components then would be used in transplants, such as plasma and albumin, for a few examples.

• Where are the witnesses to what is going on?  Well, for the past, they are dead.  But the key to the past is the present, and we know the lab technicians in most hospitals today, admit they get the blood from the placentas for the experiments of the day.  If done to day, how far back might we suspect that the mother's who birthed in hospitals had their babies weakened by early cord clamping, the mothers, for the past three generations, none the wiser, and the mother to birth tomorrow, conned, too.  

• They leave only with a "living" baby, not nature's intended blue-ribbon-baby.  If the baby dies, so what?  Who investigates the doctor when he holds up a Policy that says he / she can do this to another's child?  Policy made by the Obstetricians and Gynecologists directed this and no seems able to challenge them or correct them?  Not even the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons of each Province or Territory, or the State as the other countries involved in upholding the same policies of immediate and early clamping, as is now directed by the World Health Organization, if Oyxtocin(s), a synthetic drug is used.  Where do they stand on the Constitution and Criminal law, and Rule of Law, no profession is exempt for criminal or civil civil prosecution for unnecessary endangering to any person, regardless of age or physical and mental disadvantages?

• Without facts of information, the parents cannot make wise choices from conception to the protecting their child during the actual birth of the child.

• Most prenatal classes and Biology textbooks do not share factual information for the mother and father to make informed choices.  Many midwives and doctors use fear preaching to keep the parents from individual research.  

• Many medical person have been known to advise a pregnant woman to trust only them.  They have put fear into them, that the Internet is not a good means of getting factual information, when it is.  What "they" give is their education only and with no source of documentation and only one sided.  At least the Myles Textbook on Midwifery told about the pro's and con's of early and delayed clamping.  

• A truly educated person support waiting for all pulsation in the cord to cease to pulsate.  For any reasons supporting early clamping there may be a reason undisclosed to the mother as to her care requiring hasty clamping, and generally that is if they have, and in some cases, injected the mother with oxytocins.  

• The World Health Organization were aware of wombs closing if the cord is not cut and the doctor then immediately starts pressing down on the mothers stomach while pulling on the cord.  

• He/she fears the womb closing and trapping the placenta, then requiring an operation.  

• The child is thus deprived of essential nutrients of the blood.  

• That is not a natural process of child birth.  

• It is one manipulated by drugs and requires a Commission of Inquiry on the treatment to the mother and the child.

• Why was she not told about the dangers and could say no to drug injections while the child's birth was progressing?

• Internet allows the parents to get another point of view and sources of research.  (See References and sources of information at the list of contents.)  

• This website has References and sources of information to support it is harmful to clamp the child's lifeline/hopeline, the umbilical cord before it ceases to pulsate.  

• If the medical person(s) are saying otherwise, immediate cord clamping is necessary, when that is not done to births of another placenta birthing animals, it means they drugged the woman without telling her the consequences of taking home an anemic baby.

• The baby is knowingly weakened by deprived blood of essential enzymes and hormones, needed for his growth, and vitamins and minerals.  That is unfair to the child and to the child's legal guardians not to have made informed choices.  

• The doctors will not test the child's blood for a simply test of iron deficiency, after birth, or soon after birth.  Why not?  Because they know it is not normal for a newborn child to be short on iron, even if the mother is.  That condition, if present at birth, is likely caused by deprivation from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume which is caused by early cord clamping.  This represents 1/2 cup to a cup of blood, per size of the child.

• The baby takes the iron from the mother's blood, as all essential vitamins and minerals. But a child deprived from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume will be weakened from 6 weeks to 6 months, and this is all intention to conceal a weakened child to the parents.

• The doctors then blaming the mother for failing to feed her child properly, when the child fails to progress, has a poor appetite, and that is associated with lack of iron, and related sleep habits and behavior problems.

• It is hoped there will be support for a Petition for a Hearing or a Commission Inquiry, or at least a Conference or Forum on the care of the pregnant woman and the newborn child.  Write me if you are interested.

• Birth position is important too. Such an organized effort would bring all the theories and information together.

• Perhaps, then, and the Law and Charter of Rights of Freedoms of informed choice, would include the mothers informed what is the best practice possible, least risk of endangering. Might it be, getting back as close to natural?

• Why not a Forum, a gathering followed by Resolutions made public?

• After all, if a religious group can decide on the King James Version of the Bible, why can't doctors and midwives determine on best practice possible, least risk of harm, and the choice of natural birth process involving the decision of the mother?

• It would be a consideration if mothers had "some" input into decisions regarding their care and treatment and to their baby.

• Right now the doctors are trying to be the bosses and control the quality of the child's future, even life itself.  

• Doctors being the bosses over another man's wife and child apparently intend to not take full responsibility for their decision, and the decision is being made outside of civil and criminal law, in many instances, such as "informed choice."  

• That constitutes medical assault and battery to perhaps, both the mother and the child.  The child has civil rights to be equally protected for security of person, as the rights of any informed adult.  

• The duty then is to do best practice possible least endangering to the minor/infant.

History of Anesthesia: In 1800, Humphrey Dave suggested laughing gas, nitrous oxide, could be used as an anesthetic. Its prosperities were not demonstrated until 1844 when Horace Wells, an American dentist, used it on himself while having a tooth pulled.

• Crawford 'W. Long, an American doctor, performed an operation after making his patient unconscious with ether vapor.  In 1845, he used ether for the first time in delivering a child. Long concealed his discoveries.

•  I wonder if he did not want to upset the religious arbitrary judgment, "women shall birth in pain?"

• Whatever the reason, the credit for the discovery of anesthesia was given to W. T. G. Morton, a Boston dentist.

• Morton used ether during a tooth extraction in the mid-1840's.

• Morton used ether during a surgical operation in 1846, at Massachusetts General Hospital. In 1848, Sir James Y. Simpson, a Scottish physician used chloroform to ease childbirth.

• Queen Victoria, had chloroform .  She was one of the first women to be anesthetized during childbirth.

General Anesthesias: nitrous oxide, chloroform, ether, cyclopropane, sodium pentothal, and Fluothane, the trade name for halothane, these are either inhaled, injected or swallowed. The blood stream carries these drugs to the brain where they act to depress the sensory centers. (Note. Drugs are either water or fat soluble, and some if mixed with other drugs can be both).

• 
  Basal anesthesia is a form of general anesthesia in which drugs are injected or swallowed to cause a very light anesthesia. At one time, doctors used a mixture of morphine and scopolamine during childbirth to produce twilight sleep.
  In the final stage of complete anesthesia, the anesthetized person loses reflex action. He will not jump when his skin is pricked with a pin.
•  
  Local Anesthesia: Block anesthesia is a method in which the local anesthetic drug is injected into near a large nerve. It is used in many major operations, even child birth.
• 
  Spinal anesthesia is a form of block anesthesia. The anesthetist injects a drug into the spinal canal. There, the drug acts on the nerves to produce a loss of feeling in the lower part of the body and legs.
• 
  Caudal anesthesia is another type of block anesthesia. The anesthetist injects a local anesthetic drug into the caudal (lower) end of the spine. This method differs from spinal anesthesia because the drug bathes the nerves outside the coverings of the spinal canal. The lower parts of the patient's body become anesthetized, but the patient remains conscious. Therefore, it has proved to be an aid in surgery of the lower limbs. Caudal anesthesia was adopted in 1942 and is often used to aid "painless childbirth."
• 
  Side effects of Chloroform. This is a heavy colorless liquid used in the manufacture of fluorocabons.
  • Fluorocabons are used as cooling agents used in air conditioners and refrigerators and as propellants in some aerosol sprays. It was used as a powerful anesthetic and used to deaden pain and to produce general anesthesia. But chloroform can damage the heart, liver, and kidneys when used as an anesthetic.
  • For this reason, other less toxic anesthetics have largely replaced chloroform. Until 1976, chloroform was an ingredient in some cough medicines, liniments, and toothpastes. That year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the use of chloroform in drugs and cosmetics.
  • Tests showed that chloroform could cause cancer. Chloroform is an unwanted by-product formed in drinking water when chlorine is added at treatment plants to kill disease-causing bacteria.
  • Chloroform was discovered in 1831 by three chemists, each working independently of the others. They were Eugene Soubeiran of France, Justus von Liebig of Germany, and Samuel Guthrie of the United States. Sir James Simpson of Edinburgh publicly demonstrated chloroform as an anesthetic in 1847.
  • Queen Victoria helped win acceptance for the new drug. I guess Queen Victoria was one of the first guinea pigs to have drugs in childbirth. She had not been informed of the merits of warm births in water tubs.  Most of the last three generations, since 1923, have not be informed, either.  Wise women have always done this and gravity births, most common to nature, if man does not take control and boss women around in childbirth, which is NOT man's domain. It may be as simple as that as to the many false practices imposed on women, blindly trust in man's skills in use of tools on her body.  How silly we women have been.  Mostly uninformed as to our own body's design.  And embarrassed to discover ourselves, really.  

• I do not know if man is just impatient and cannot stand to see women moaning in childbirth, and they sought to make her quiet by drugging her, but if they did so, they were interrupting the natural hormones and enzymes of both mother and child, that sets the motion of childbirth and the muscle contractions.
• If these are working together, the contractions are bearable, whereas long hard close together contractions rob the child of oxygen. Nature does not do that to the child. So the painless childbirth offered to women in most hospitals, only applies to the morphines offered which slow down the labor.
• If the convenience of man was then to speed up the labor for his convenience for the child to be delivered in normal working hours (after all doctors are human with families), the use of oxytocins to speed up labor could be to his advantaged and not the best well being for mother and child.
• Often these oxytocin drugs then had the woman screaming in uncontrollable pain and the child may indicate distress, and the solution then was a fast c-section, if the child was to be born alive.

• In the late 1940's Dr. Virginia Apgar, an American anesthetist developed a test for drugged babies.  Most drugged babies were clamped and cut from their cords almost instantly at birth.  It is presumed the doctors were taking a chance of iron and anemia deficiency to toxic poisoning of drugs crossing the placenta.  But the woman trusting in the medical professionals were not so informed.  

• As for Dr. Apgar, she really wanted to be a surgeon but was told she would not be accepted as she was mere woman. She was led into being an anesthetist.  Her skills then led her to drug the pregnant ladies.  Herself, she never married and never had children.

• From the drugging of the pregnant ladies then brought in the Apgar score testing for the infants who had been subjected to side effects of anesthesia.

• Neither Virginia Apgar or the tests are reported in Encyclopedias, at least not in WB. Her Apgar tests are now used world wide, and the results are on all current government stats information.

• PKU testing may also be on the Certificates that are not given the parents, only the doctor gets a copy for his/her files and copy goes to the government's office.  To get a copy of the full disclosure of the facts of the baby's birth, it will cost the parents or the adult child $50.00.  

• That is most unfair for getting a copy of some medical record kept on the public members that they themselves were not given at the time of the child's birth, the parents unaware what the doctor's were doing, even genetic testing from the child's placenta or blood cells.  

• This is all done without informed consent or purpose it is done and kept a record on all babies, at least, those born in British Columbia, Canada.

• Some teachers actually wanted access to the Apgar tests, no doubt to see which children had 0 on the first tests and a logical explanations of the child's difficulties in learning new information, such as reading, writing and doing math.

• The tests used for anesthetized children, were needed to watch the children who were weak and limp for moment to moment supervision for their survival, if they were to survive at all.

• Following the drugging of the mothers, the babies were being early clamped. The mothers accepting the drugs were not informed the consequences would be early clamped babies. That would bring another problem, anemia, but the mothers would not be informed of this, nor would the babies be tested, and if so, the results of any tests were not given to the mother.

• She then could not know the endangering to her child, and some mothers may not have afforded supplements recommended by doctors, if they knew of the consequences of deprived blood and the relationship of anemia.

• The Apgar tests, are recorded on the required Birth Certificate filed in the government offices, were 1 minute scores and the 5 minute scores.

• These test results and the detailed birth certificates were seldom if ever given to the parents.

• Most did not even know their children were being tested. Today, if the parents want the information they must pay $50.00 to see what the doctor and nurse recorded about the registered birth certificate of their baby.

TEST RESULTS:

•  It is believed the 1-minute tests were done for children who were drugged and the 5-minute tests were for undrugged babies who were allowed full delayed clamping. In either case, trends of early and delayed clamping began with the use of anesthesias.
• It seems the drugs ARE related to the timing of the clamping of the cord, early clamping for drugged babies.  But all was a concealed intent of the doctor, the mother not having informed consent or choice on what was done to her or her baby.
• Many women were asked if they wanted a painless and quick birth.  This is a deception, to have a painless birth is to be so drugged the baby's proper announcement through the birth canal is interrupted.  Some drugs slowing down the labor, then other drugs causing long hard painful contractions that starve the child of oxygen, and can displace the child in the birth canal, and cause cords around the neck.  This is because the child is struggling to breathe.  Many then have distress of meconium, that is "poop" that is not normally caused unless the child fears for his life, so traumatized.
• Those women choosing "active management:" have been deceived.  They have not made informed choices, nor were they educated at their paid for government controlled prenatal classes.  That is a form of breach of trust, of their time and what information was withheld so the woman could not make informed consent for what they signed for "appropriate care."
• What is really meant by painless and quick births translates into a lifetime of hardship for the family and the victimized child.

• If the government with their representatives at all medical societies colleges and committees, were aware of drugging of the mothers and early cord clamping, and the use of them during trends of society, for example war years or science research and the need of blood of experiments, they did not offer any information to be made to the trusting women in her physician or midwife.
• What I see now of the remedial reading books from the 1930 to the 1950's, the Dick, Jane, Sally, Puff and Spot whole word books taught by repetition, repetition, and more repetition, were required textbooks in all schools. These books assured a population to be reading at least at the grade five level.  What they did assure was that most persons graduated from high school reading at about the grade 5 level, which was what most newspapers wrote their articles for that level of reading.
• The phonetic approach to reading, no doubt, was considered too time consuming and difficult for the teachers to handle in large class rooms.  Particularly, if the children looked normal in all appearances, but were minimally brain damaged by an estimated  50 percent of the class, perhaps more.  (See references of Magical Child, list of contents).
• The book, the Magical Child, chapter, Time Bomb, written in the 1970's by educator, Joseph Chilton Pearce, revealed the research of Dr. William Windle, that there were indications of brain lesions of monkeys who were drugged and followed with immediate cord clamping.  And evidence of that fact was observed on the human babies who died shortly after birth, after their mothers were drugged during labor and the infant's birth was followed by immediate cord clamping.  
• Were the methods of treatment of the mother and the child during childbirth, responsible for learning difficulties of almost every other child?   Most likely.  But,  this is theory.  Those involved in any such education trends, now being dead.
  • The review of the authors and writers of the books, at least of Marion Monroe, (Mrs. William Cox) indicated, who wrote many of the remedial series of Dick & Jane, had researched at Psychologists Psychopathic Hospital, director Reading Clinic American Psychological Association, American's Association for the Advancement of Science National Conference for Research in English.

BIRTH CHOICES:

• If natural birth by the woman choosing undrugged births and to birth in warm water births is a choice of the mothers, and no clamping of the cord, what is that to the medical professionals?  The W.H.O. states no harm done, for hospital or homebirth.
• And for the mother to choose a side-ways or forward sitting birth position or a gravity position, why would any medical person object? For what logical reason?   
• The past three generations of women have not been educated correctly on choices they may make on child birth.  
  • Most women are not educated that the clamping and cutting of the cord, except for (1) core tore and (2) placenta previa, is only cosmetic.
  • The clamping has dangers by cord infections and long time for the cut cord to heal, 8 days to 2 weeks, compared with only 2 or 3 days of a drying unclamped cord and placenta.  

NO needles of any kind must be permitted to the newborn healthy infant:

• The parents must be warned not to let the medical person put in a needle to syringe out blood while the cord is still pulsating.  
• This defeats the child's right to no risk of any infections, regardless of how clean the medical person alleges the needle to be, and it is taking substance from the child's right to all blood his body will determine it needs.  
• The mother must be educated she is the legal guardian of the child and as such, can refuse inserting the needle to take blood samples for testing of PKU or to insert needles for infant injections of Vitamin K.  
• That would not be necessary for full delayed clamping.  And Vitamin K, I have read does not form naturally in the child's gut, until about the 8th day, for proper blood clotting factors of the blood.  Parents must not allow injections of Heb B either as most of those injections had questionable ingredients, like mercury in them, too, like other vaccinations, given before the child's second birthday.

• They wanted to separate children who probably would have difficulty with schoolwork from those who probably would succeed. Binet checked the accuracy of the tests against the children's actual classroom performance.
• Lewis M. Terman, revived the Binet-Simon tests in 1916. Terman and Maude A. Merrill, both psychologists at Stanford University, published later revisions in 1937 and 1960. These versions are called the Revised Stanford-Binet tests.
• Any child that can get at least a 50 IQ score is not given extra tutoring to achieve higher or to have more career options. Today, to deal with learning disadvantaged children, no testing or scores are given, only comments on the report cards.
• These comments do not give a clear picture of the child's progress, such as, "Your child is the ray of sunshine, in my class." This means the child makes no fuss and no demands. Many children are graduating without skills to be able to read, write, or do math. As each level of teachers complained to the lower grades, "Give us something to work with." The reply was, "Don't expect a finished product." The latter was subsequently passed on to the employers.
• Parents were upset with the failure of progress of so many children. Teachers had given up, they did not know how to help Dick and Jane read. The solution became home schooling, private schools, specialized learning paces, organization of churches all participating in teaching of the children.
• Value schools wanted discipline and a specific grade letter report cards. These were heated discussions. School Boards made promises to each other, to hang firm, not to give into Petitions for Alternatives schools in their areas, if they had anything to do with "Value" schools.
• Parents gave up with negotiations as there were none.  Everything was debatable but not negotiable.  The parents, with the consent of the children, began pulling students from the public schools. That began to hurt head counts, as the school is given $3000 to $4,000 per child, based on the previous years enrollment.
• The public were frustrated with the experimentation on the students with the publics ever changing curriculums and content of textbooks.
• The greatest dissatisfaction reported in 1993, was written up in MacLeans and the Reader's Digest, May 1993;, Our Schools Parents Press for Change, Across the country thousands are demanding a return to basics.
• The results were that the most dissatisfaction of parents are in Ontario 61 percent and in British Columbia, 63 percent.  
• If early cord clamping and drugging of the pregnant mother are a factor, these two Provinces, have  private cord blood banks that are seeking their share of any trapped blood in the placentas.
•  If doctors are competently trained that the cord should not be clamped while it is still pulsating, and mothers should not be drugged, if early clamping follows, there be no trapped blood in the placentas.  
• This is, if nature intended undrugged blood to be in the owner/infant if that helps the child to be a blue-ribbon-baby, with no health or learning problems. Life is difficult as it is, without interference by drugging and hasty clamping with natural intended abilities of the child.

• Many are getting labels of attention deficit disorder. In this way, the child is given means of extra tutoring to be taught. The label gives the school a duty to increase the child's remedial learning sessions.
• Were the birth practices and trends not investigated resulting in some compromised children, who looked, physically beautiful. These children could learn many things by physical repetition and verbal language skills, most of them, if they were not autistic in speech skills. But many could not learn to read, write or spell, as normally as their peer group. And consequences of the child's actions was difficult for them to accept.
• Many of the impaired but normally looking children do not perceive danger. They can be unpredictable as to their means to assault another child.
• Many of the children have difficulty in remembering new information without constant daily repetition in conduct and in skills. Marriage and financial independence is not a realistic goal for these damaged children.
• Their quality of life, was impaired and compromised during and after birth, if the facts were investigated. Our society does not want to do this research.
• Some, children, were damaged at conception by the fact some parents actually did abuse substances, and the mother continued through the pregnancy with such detrimental life style to add to the problem of harmful medical practices, of medical drugs that would be followed by immediate cord clamping.
• The fetal alcohol syndrome child would have physical deformities relating to substance abuse; the children damaged by medical drugs during and after birth would look beautiful but they were equally or as bad as the FAS children.
• Many of the fat soluble and water soluble drugs given during birth can damage the brain's membranes, and pit the brain. The expectations of the compromised child's progress would be on physical normalcy in appearances, only, not to the undiscovered damaged brain cells or nerve cells caused by some drugs.
• One nerve cell likely responsible for the connection to 10,000 other cells for the child's ability in performance. All this information has been inadequately made know to the future parents. Do we build our wealth on impairing the young, or producing able children to be trained to reach their fullest potential?

• Such information is important in the proper education of the future parents, if they are to make wise choices why to avoid drugs, even the drugs offered by the doctor, for the pregnant mother, at "any" time of pregnancy, the treatment of drugs likely doing more harm then good, at least to the child.
• These compromised children are greatly disadvantage in the means of occupation. None of the professionals went back to the birth of the child, the drugs used and accepted by the mother, and the timing of the clamping of the cord, and failure to test for anemia within days of the child's birth.
• What of the drugs used in labor destroying the brains means to produce new brain cells?  
• The World Book states that the brain creates new brain cells until the child is about two years of age, then the cells just get bigger, until the child is about age 15.
• I would think a drug and a oxygenated blood deprived child would be the child disadvantaged to new brain cell development and other organ and blood and lymph dysfunctions.

VACCINATIONS COMPOUND THE ALREADY ANEMIC AND COMPROMISED CHILD:

• Compounding the distress of the child, weakened, and likely anemic by blood deprivation by early clamping, would be the vaccinations.  Some compromised children as least with normal physical development, some with average to above average mental abilities were given  6 to 9 shots at one time.  
• Checking the lots of the vaccinations, after serious side-effects, it was discovered most of the shots had contained preservatives and trace elements of mercury, and some aluminum.
• The assault and battery on children are by private companies and by some self-regulating medical persons.  And we do not have some of these professional business persons in jail. Why not?
  • Note:  An Inquiry on the Contamination of the Blood Supply, has brought criminal charges of the directors involved with the Canadian Red Cross and one drug company in the United States.  
  • More charges are pending.  
  • This is allowing Rule of Law to investigate large institutions in charge and in control of our health institutes

____________________________

Easy reading for infant or impaired older child.    (It is never too late to learn to read).  This has its own list of contents extended version.

• Show your child a simple page, of an easy subject with a few words.  Point your finger to the words on the page.
• The infant will turn his head away, the first time experience.  The child is frustrated as a new experience.
• Close the book for another day.
• Repeat the same page until the child grins at the same familiar page. Do this for a few days.
• Show the same picture of the object, if it is chair or ball, and point to the same object within the home's environment.
• Make your child's own picture book of his family and the relationship to the child.  That is personal awareness teaching.
• When the child is fully familiar with the page being taught and grins, and does not turn his/her head away, then it is time to turn the page to a new adventure.  They child will be having quality time and the parents having fun too, as the child's teacher.   
• Advance the information as to the child's age and interest.
• Put the alphabet and the phonetics up in the child's room, and in order.  Repeat a game of recognition, and do the letters in order.  Songs children love to learn.  They will learn songs and poems as fun, if taught from infancy up.  A favorite is Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.  Other favorites are counting poems, such as: One, Two Buckle My Shoe.
• As the child gets older, show him/her a simple filing system of the child's personal picture pages by subjects of the alphabet.  Their own drawings can be put in their own made alphabetical filing folder.  Children catch on early.
• Repetition is the key to all learning. Early infancy teaching helps the child develops good habits and good memory recall. Teachers are aware of the quality time parents and family spend with the child.  It shows.  
• The child's brain is encouraged in growth, that may have been impaired by cell-damaged if the mother used any drugs prior to conception, after, and during birth. Or, the father, if he used drugs and was not clean of them, before the conception of the child.  The father having an important part as well as the mother conceiving a healthy child.  
• Blue-ribbon-babies are a right of genetic inheritance.  Each generation is responsible for the next, and thereafter.
• See the RCMP message on drugs for the youth, in the list of contents.

Donna Young

Mother and Grandmother

Box 504

Dawson Creek, BC

V1G 4H4 Canada

donna@123babybirth.com

website and home page:    www.lotusbirth.com

www.123-baby-birth.com

Suggested medical website:    www.cordclamping.com

Internet, V. Apgar.

Success, April 1996, For Teaching Kids to Read, He got . . . Whacked! by the anti-Entrepreneurs, John Shanahan: How the FTC attacked "Hooked on Phonics"  and almost destroyed his company, referenced to Dick and Jane Textbooks.

Website:   http://education.aynrand.org/cant_add.html

Note:  My websites ( www.lotusbirth.com  and www.123-baby-birth.com  and www.123babybirth.com ) may be used for your studies and for  information.  But, please give credits where information or ideas were first formed from these sites and the referrals I give to others who have valuable information and concerns to share, too.   

Thank you.  Donna Young

_____________________________

STOP ACTIVE MANAGEMENT FOR SAFER OPTIONS AND INFORMED CHOICES:

Note:   PETITION     www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com

We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.

We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.

Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; Laying of Information ; Mandamus ; and any other subject you may be interested in

child birth.  Search Lotusbirth

(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect the public on medical policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies, and colleges did not live up to no form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind.  It is believed they had a duty to have a policy of equal protection and security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.

contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home Page:   www.lotusbirth.com

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com