The World Health Organization Directs Immediate Cord Clamping for Drugged Babies concerns of Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

     The World Health Organization (WHO) is directly or indirectly, advocating the endangering of babies, world wide.  Revised August 14, 2004. This url is www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-203.htm

    WHO, their supposition statement below, advocates that the world's babies be allowed to be early umbilical cord clamped.  This is if the mother is injected with a man-made drug, oxytocin.  The drug, they claim, damages the baby's brain.  Early cord clamping injures the baby brain, too, by low oxygen volume and low blood pressure.  The brain vein blood vessels have no valves in them, so nothing will keep the blood volume and pressure there, when the cord's blood volume and pressure is amputated.

    Oxytocin, a dangerous man-made drug, is also known and/or sold as: Pitocin, Syntocinon, and Toesen and these man-made drug all work to cause blood vessel constriction to hopefully stop the bleeding of anemic mothers, who are giving birth.  As bleeding by an anemic mother is unpredictable, some medical societies have suggested an Active Management policy to treat all women with drugs, then followed by WHO's directive, early umbilical cord clamping. Such methods are welcomed by the cord blood banks, springing up around the world.  The policies of WHO, knowingly or not, are conducive to the exploiting of babies in robbing the child of their blood needing to keep them healthy and strong.

    WHO's influence and protocols are directly or indirectly supporting active management to be imposed, on all babies.  No choice or little choice then is actually being allowed the mothers to stop the potential harvesting of "their" baby, or can stop the drugging of their persons.

    Women to be adequately protected, will need a "signed" Birth Contract delivered to the birthing institution by an official legal representative of the parents of the expected child. It must state any rough handling of the mother or the child will be investigated.  This is necessary, because, when mothers have tried to protect their child from the early clamping directives, doctors have become militant and imposed early clamping for frivolous reasons and fears not present.  To avoid the possibility of this attitude that is unprofessional, the parents must not allow themselves to be intimidated or  threatened by any medial person having their nose out of joint they can't just do just anything when birth is natural, and can be hand's off, in most iunstances.  Most institional births are so manipulated it will be hard to have that hand's off birth, in a rented hospital room, without a posting on the door, hand's off natural birth in progress. We'll call for help, as and if necessary.  

    The medical policies and ethics of of some medical societies and their organizations advocating informed choice, are therefore, merely, superfluous, or not sincere. An ethical medical person will sign the birth contract and will sit in another room, so the mother births without alarm, and by her own means.  Who is present in the child's birth room, is by invitation of the mother.  Who is paid for services from the Mother's Birth Voucher (see below) is by contract for fees for services or a person's time spent with her as a friend of the family.

    The early cord clamping is being medically challenged to be the contributing common cause of the increase of autism, world wide and many other internal disorders of children.  Some of the damaged children are now adults, with the same problems not cured. (see www.cordclamping.com).

    The consequences of early umbilical cord clamping knowingly and visually can be seen and tested to have deprived the infants of their enzymes, hormones, vitamins, minerals, white cells, red cells, stem cells, and interferon of the child's blood.  Why would an internationally tax-supported health organization NOT protect babies and their mothers by full warning and cautions on any prescribed medical policy or procedure?  

    SIMPLE RESOLUTION TO A LONG-TIME PROBLEM, I shared with WHO, that we PAY MOTHERS TO ATTEMPT TO HAVE HEALTHY BLUE RIBBON BABIES:

    The payment program I have suggested to WHO is conditional. Money is not just to be handled over to the mother who has birthed a child.  The conditions of payment are the sum of what is left after the mother pays, from the provided credit funds, her own requested medical services, in child birth.  If the mother volunteers to be actively managed, she pays for what she expects done to her person.  

     I advocate giving the mother a $3,000 credit, at any birth center.  From this credit, the mother can sign informed consent of the risks of any drug, or gas used in child birth labor discomfort, and chosen long before the birth of her child for informed consent of all risks known, even a death of a woman or child, as a side-effect of the drug taken the drug and that she is now requesting.  Women in child birth must have a duty to accept her own responsibility and liability to the child's well being, by stating she is aware of the risks of any gases and drugs as they all cross the placenta and can impair the baby's brain and nervous system.  And no drug is safe as to allergic reactions, unpredictable, and to storage and quality of how the drug is made and by whom.  

    By signing a waiver of the risks, the mother informed, truthfully informed of all risks, assumes the duty of mothering an impaired child often caused by active management policies and procedures.  Natural birth is much safer as it does not have the risk of allergies, as no drugs are knowingly taken or herbs the mother is not aware of.  Therefore, paying mothers to take their own risks by informed choice means the tax payer and society is not only taking the risks and costs of raising an impaired and compromised child.  Duty is implied for both the mother and the father to be truthfully and factually informed on a child's birth process, and that they can handle the birth, in an emergency, if necessary, without harm to the mother or the child.  

    The duty of care to the child will be to the father and the mother of the child, so make sure the father is supportive and educated too. Some fathers do try to dump their duty and responsibility by not being prepared for fatherhood, by being truthfully and factually informed and assisting in the best decision possible for the pregnant mother and her child.  All should be informed of the risks of Active Management and the risk of any birth, natural or by a c-section birth.  

     THE CREDIT BIRTH VOUCHER :  What the now-educated mother accepts, ideally before planning a family for informed decisions, the cost of that care is deducted from the birth credit voucher.  And the mother has anything left after paying for Active Management, is her decision.  She can go no cost or low cost of natural birth education and practice.  She would be in charge and any money left in her account is hers to keep, for her own needs or that of her baby or babies.  The repeat business of internal birth injuries to mothers and the children harmed by drugs should be reduced and the higher costs of educating impaired and compromised birth-injured babies should be reduced, too. Mentally impaired children that get in trouble with the law, looking for an easy way to earn a living, when they can't meet the challenges demanded of higher education, may be reduced as well.  All of society benefits by a child have their fullest genius potential left intact.

    If the birthing mother can become educated for natural birth, all she need pay is for a rented hospital room.  I advocate rented hospital rooms, for if the unplanned, happens, an upset in the perfect birth (don't know of one yet), the mother is close to help if accepted.  

    The money credit is per child, so if the birthing mother has twins, or more children, she leaves with $3,000 per child born.  

     Can multiple births be born naturally?  Yes. The Dionne (Quints) sisters, all five of them, were born in the family home.  This was in the year, 1934, near Callander, Ontario, Canada.  If the doctor, a family doctor, was competently and ethically trained, he would not have tied off a pulsating umbilical cord.  Each quint would have had her own share of the blood as to her individual need, the rule being as in the womb sharing of one placenta, first come, first need.  The quintuplets, the first to survive in the world for any length of time, suggests that the rural family doctor was ethically and competently trained, as most of the quintuplets lived, a long time.  I believe two, now age 70, yet live.

    If the average birth costs $6,000 for medical services, then the system is ahead in savings, if they pay the mother, after she pays for her choice of labor discomfort, or uses natural methods of pain relief.  

    The most painful of births is malposition of the child, in a face up presentation.  His/her back is against the mother's back. This pain can be more distressful if the amniotic fluid is low. Sometimes the water breaks, and this condition may be caused by an anxious mother doing things to herself, tired of being pregnant and focused on a due date, she then becomes desperate to terminate the pregnancy.  In doing so, she may damage herself and her child. Patience and waiting for natural birth presentation, rather than contrived, may be the best decision the mother makes.

    That is why from conception to birth, mothers planning a family should be better educated.  The water the amniotic fluid is known to increase and decrease, and in birth, it is protective to the child in the birth canal, from disease and from injury.  It need not be broken, but may be broken in natural birth.  The baby is breathing through the umbilical cord, and babies are all born, a normal fetus circulation color, bluish.

    The amniotic fluid may be determined by the mother's own volume of liquids taken. Rather than drugs used to relax the mother nearing the end of the pregnancy, she is strongly suggested ti get more rest, and fresh air and light walking exercises before her due date. Rule of thump is  relax, don't worry, Don't Panic.  Go by intuition of the baby's movement or lack of it.  Babies, in most instances, know what to do. Suggestions of no harm are have a warm water birth, the water is not too hot and not too cold. Simply bring the baby's face out of the water, it is not a fish.  Warmth of water is refreshing. A forward leaning birth chair have been used.  Avoid the chairs that lean backwards, they close the birth canal up to 30 percent and give power of control over to the birth person, and the mothers should have the control, not a stranger touching the baby's person.

    These suggestions cost nothing but the cost of the warm water, and walking and changing the mothers birth positions.  The water, hopefully, clean, not like Walkerton's contaminated water, relaxes the mother and reduces anxiety.

    The mother should be happy being in control and having a signed Birth Contract outlining, on one page, what will not be done to her person or her baby.  The baby, if naturally birthed then should be a blue ribbon baby with full immunities by not clamping the umbilical cord ever.  The baby is wrapped in a waiting warm towel, that is changed frequently, to keep the baby warm and dry.  

    The placenta is expelled by not tying the cord or cutting it, and putting it, too, in a waiting warm towel, changed frequently.  The cord is not ever tied or cut.  So there is no risk of infections getting into the child's blood stream through the cut cord.  

     Facts of cutting the cord, it endangers the child:  A cut cord takes 5 to 15 days to heal.  A unclamped cord and placenta falls off in two day's time. The facts are the cut cords are the cause of over 500,000 millions babies death, that were otherwise healthy babies.  They died of blood infections through their cut cords, or they died of virus getting into their bodies by needles inserted for blood samples.  Don't allow it, be in control.

    Here are examples of Super Bugs killing Western Babies, too:   

    Two babies died of such blood infections in the Vancouver Children's Hospital in 1998, and 47 others were threatened. Then, again, on September 29, 2002, three babies were struggling with the Super Bug.  These were premature babies.  These are facts that is not just developing nations babies that are at risk blood infections, through a cut cord.

    The Super Bug is MRSA, Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccus Aureus .  It can be in airborne or brought in on the clothing of any person visiting the babies.  The MRSA was discovered in the early 1960s after it ravaged hospitals with infections and deaths.  The bug can be found on catheters, hospital cottons and cuddly bunnies.

    Healthy people can keep the bug at bay, but the young and the old are at greatest risk because their immune system are weakened. Babies early umbilical cord clamped,  because they are being harvested and premature babies have the higher quantity of stem cells, and are at greater risk.  Scientists have discovered that the bugs acquired genes to resist antibiotics from other bacteria.

    Treatment is the use of Vanco, or Vancomycin, used as a last resort.  The risks to the baby is in injecting more bacteria that could worsen their precarious health.  (Reference:  The Province, Sunday, September 29, 2003, P1 and Page A3).

     The blue ribbon baby, born by a signed Birth Contract, how the child is cared for, will be the reward the mother owes to herself, and to the father of the child.  This is if the birth mother elects for a no drugged birth, a warm water birth, and catches her own baby. Following the birth of the baby, she does not faint to leave the cord attached and to show respect to the placenta, to be born soon, 5 minutes to 20 minutes later.

     In that period of time, nothing to the cord should be done but protection so to keep the cord flexible and not pulled on. The Mother's Signed Birth Contract states and is signed for others NOT  to clamp or cut the cord. That is a legal right not to have cosmetic surgery or meddling of the child's lifeline.  

    The mother can leave the hospital, the same day, with a healthy baby. The mother is wise not to allow the baby to go anywhere out of her sight, where the unethical staff may seek to syringe out the placenta blood for selling on the open market.  Some babies placenta blood is worth $30,000 an ounce, if it is rare.  European and Asian blood mixes are most valued.

    Of course, the merits of being a blue ribbon baby, is depended on the proper education of both the mother and the father. They need to be in control of a natural event. There should be no secrets in the care of the child or the mother.  The would-be-parents implied duty is to make their own volunteer sacrifice to have a healthy baby.  These-parents-to-be owe it to themselves of this right to have strong healthy children.  So voluntarily they choose to avoid pollution areas, where conception in those area damage the child from the beginning.  And to avoid such contaminates after conception that would harm the mother and her developing embryo, the fetus and to the on-going protection of the neonate after birth.  This means leave the cord alone.

    After conception, the mother voluntarily has avoided food and beverages and drugs that are known to cause birth defects at the time of conception, and have avoided even scanning of the baby.  It is a known science statement that the state-of-the-art-technology, is not known to be safe, or reliable in information.

     The Dangers of Scanning the Fetus:

    Many women have been misguided as to the condition of the child, so some persons warn not to use scans for frivolous reasons, like determining the sex of the child, for example.  One scan often leads to more curious seeking scans and are misused as a teaching tool. What is happening, one cannot correct a problem, the choice often is an abortion. The fetus just being exploited, running up medical fees, too.

    In some situations as to false reading of the scans, women, fearing a damaged child. Regrettably, they aborted healthy babies as to doctors suggesting they have a problem. One common statement is they fear the baby has a hole in the heart. This is a true statement, all babies have a hole in the heart in the fetal heart development stages. The heart begins as a long tube, doubles up, becomes two chambers, and after birth there is a division of closer of the by-passes windows, for the heart to be a four chamber heart.  The heart may even change its angle, too.

    The doctors is referring to the normal fetal heart development of the openings, the ductus arteriosus and/or the foreman ovale .  These are by-pass windows, because the lungs are not getting the blood. The by-pass windows will close if the baby's heart volume and pressure is maintained by not clamping off the umbilical cord until after the placenta is expelled, if clamping and cutting is the preference of cosmetic removal. If the baby has low blood volume and pressure, by early umbilical cord clamping, the holes in the heart may not seal for up to a year, I've read.

    Some mothers gave their wrongfully aborted fetus to research.  They found out they had aborted a healthy baby by misinformation of the scans.  Most mothers, today, do not scan their babies, so that is additional payment to the mother, in my suggested birth voucher.  This is for the cost of medical testing the mother had a right to decline what services she wants or is of benefit to the developing fetus.

    As to the damaged and compromised babies, many of their defects are now suspected as being medically caused by the state-of-the-art technology.  Nothing of our means of necessary intervention to help should be abused.  If the two parents taking their own responsibility to be informed, the benefits will benefit society, too.  This should be revealed in a decrease in health and education costs by fewer impaired children. The same budget, we now have to managed compromised children, can be used in their compensation for birth injuries imposed and then for greater opportunities in developing the abilities of talented children who should be born blue ribbon babies.  The World Health Organization should be behind blue ribbon babies for all to be born equal on Planet Earth.  The facts, today, we are damaging our babies.  One in 16 babies have defects, some minor, some serious.  Reference of that statement is to Inquiry Into Life, 9th Edition, Sylvia S. Mader.

OTHER CONCERNS THE BABIES AND THE MOTHER ARE NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECTED:  

    (see Petition:  Protect Babies and Mothers, Too   www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814 This is intervenors request to protect helpless Canadian babies) and the USA petition to better educate the medical persons, is at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/954816565 .

    The blood volume deprived any infant is from 20 to 50 percent total blood volume deprivation.  To give the reader better understanding of my research and a visual picture, a 9-pound, full term baby, only creates 10 ounces of blood, or 300 ml. (The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. B. (Blood), p 324, 1979.  

    The medical visual facts are that the average blood collection taken from any private corporation, cord stem cell blood banks, is between 60 and 180 ml.  These private corporation blood banks advise how to get the blood collection and that is by draining the placenta through the cord, that is why the collection is called cord blood.  

    WRONGFUL ADVERTISING -- MISLEADING THE PUBLIC:

    The name, cord stem cell blood, misrepresents the cord blood collecting process and the amount deprived the infant/citizen. The name stem cell cord blood, is suggesting to the public that only a tad of blood is being deprived the child. That is false information intentionally allowed.  And, I say, not one drop of blood, nor one hair on the child's head, be violated.  If a Dublin, Ireland Judge, can rule battery for even a fine needle inserted to draw blood for a genetic testing, then one drop of blood deprived the child by interference of the circulation system is battery, too.

    The major news medias, like in Canada, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) by their own policing of news contents, have a duty to inform the public of any dangers to any one person of Canada.  This is a legal duty to the child, too, even of a baby's threat. But the bodily threat and those in charge of health education and practices, have not, as yet, dealt honestly with this health issue.

    To this writing, August 14, 2002, CBC has refused to give the public the full truth of the threat of early umbilical cord clamping and how the timing of the clamping of the cord, is being used as a scam on cord blood collecting.  The scam is being carried out across Canada, in almost every community hospital. This health problem will not just be found out as an issue of "over there", but in is in our Nation too, harvesting our babies, exploiting them, at birth, for their blood, more valued, then gold.  What penalty, might we have for those who allowed the deception to go on for so long?  The codes in the both civil and criminal directives, have been breached, involving the highest government officials, and those in charge of training medical persons, including those involved in lab studies and in research.  Those that set policies were involved in Canada's Tri-Council Policy Statement, and they permitted any organ removed from the person's body, to be used in research and to be used, without true and honest informed consent how it was used or discarded, as factually, witnessed.  Was the discarding by burning or by discarding in paid medical research and paid collection of the organ, and paid to whom?

DUTY IMPLIED TO BE ETHICAL AND RESPECTFUL OF THE CHARTER OR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND PRIVACY LAWS:

    Any hospital that has a centrifugal machine, that separates blood into plasma, for example, has the means to exploit any child born on the hospitals or birth centre's premise.  

    The blood deprived the child is put into a chemical solution, heparin (rat poison), to keep it from clotting, and the sample can be sent anywhere in the world for cloning purposes or immediate use in transplants.  

    The hospital labs, private or public, may report the baby's placenta as empty, when received.  But they may have received the baby's blood taken by methods of syringing out the placenta in test tubes, of a variety of sizes.  Or, the laboratory may have received the plastic blood bag, that can contain up to 250 ml of blood that was wrongfully deprived the owner/infant.

    The plastic bag, for the collection of the baby's deprived blood, is concealed under a sheet, where the cord from the placenta is allowed to drain into the collection bag.  In most instances, the mother is not aware of the deception and disrespect going on to her and her child, as to blood deprivation schemes of the doctor and his aid, the nurse.  When the nurse did not put down the condition of the cord when clamped, that it was red firm, and pulsating, or white caused by hypothermia of a cold room and the child not wrapped in a warm towel, she becomes not an innocent witness, observing the care and treatment by the medical person(s) in charge, but becomes an accessory to a believed assault on the child, of unnecessary interference of the child's circulation system.  When the nurse participates in the failure of documentation of where the baby's blood is documented as going to and how much, the nurses has aided and abetted in the destruction of evidence, also a criminal crime, called obstruction of justice, should this matter have its day in court.

    The mother, if she did not consent to endangering her child, of course, will not feel, any emotional pain or physical suffering.  This is because the baby's blood is not her body's blood.  She does not get weakened, only if she bleeds from her own cutting of her body, and the normal blood tissues expelled in the normal blood discharge, normally, expelled in a regular monthly menstrual period.

    What has been done to the child, is a crime against the child's person, some of the children treated as a second class citizen, harvested for their nutrients of their own blood, created from conception to birth for the child's own individual needs, that only the child, and not a stranger can determine, how much and when to close off the internal exchange of blood between the child's organ, the placenta and his/her own heart and lungs.

NOT ONE ELECTED FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL OFFICIAL PROTECTED THE NEWBORN CITIZEN, WHY NOT?:

    The House of Commons must be investigated to their paid health representatives and to the paid Canadian elected Federal Members of Parliament (MPs).  They have not upheld the Nation's laws, unbiasedly to the newborn citizen.  They have not done their duty in protecting equally by the criminal offenses against the person. Nor, have they required the necessary investigating of the rising cost of health care to children and the education costs to now impaired and compromised children.

    The children under one year of age are on almost on par of the need of health care costs, their needs are as great as the individuals at the other end of the scale of life, the Senior Citizens.  These two vulnerable groups, are in need of advocacy because they truly do have the greatest medical costs, in Canada.  We can understand the need of a non-preventable health condition, of old age, but there is no good excuse why we are not having healthy blue ribbon babies.  

    Apparently, the misrepresentation to the health officials, who ought to be the Watch Dogs of our best interests, is coming from the private enterprise that monitor there own self-interests, doctors and their association of other private enterprise, blood banks.    To Quote, the official opposition's Health Critique, Rob Merrifield, M.P., Ottawa, (Tel) 613) 992-1653 and fax (613) 992-3459.  Merrifield, said, "

    "I have consistently supported stem cell reseach using non-embryonic sources, including umbilical cord blood. I was not aware of any ethical concerns (other than costs of harvesting and storage) with respect to the use of this rich source of stem cells.  Dr. Peter Hollands, Scientific Director of Cells for Life, an umbilical cord blood bank located in Markham, Ontario has stated that the collection of umbilical cord blood "does not interfere with the birthing process" and "has no effect whatsoever on the baby or the mother."  

    "The Cells for Life website (www.cellsforlife.com) describes cord blood collection as a "safe, quick and non-invasive procedure." Medical licensing and practice are matters of provincial jurisdiction.  Accordingly, the specific concerns raised in your letter should be addressed at the provincial level.  If you have not already done so, I would encourage you to contact your local MLA and Colin Hansen, B.C. Minister of Health Services.  

    "Finally, I would encourage you to contact the new federal health minister, the Honourable Pierre Pettigrew, to express your concerns. You can write to him, postage free, care of:  House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A OA6."

    Note:  WE are back to square one. The new Federal Minister of Health, is the former Premier of BC, who was advised of this problem and he did nothing, stating the problem is with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC, who were contacted and Dr. Van Andel, Registrar, told me persona, that "Early Umbilical Cord Clamping, is a trend, and would do nothing to stop it.  There would be, therefore, implied, no stopping the harvesting of babies for profits the doctors would seek a benefit from and any others who may also profit by exploiting babies for raw material, their blood.

    As you can note, Rob Merrifield, MP, did not take the time of day to send a copy of his letter to those he wanted any investigative care of how the Federal money is spent in research or the process of obtaining raw material tissue, used in research.  There was no personal advocacy of protection to the babies to have his personal support or follow up of protecting babies.  

    For the interest of the reader, the British Columbia Premiers and various Ministry of Provincial Health, were contacted, and all have declined to investigate the harvesting of babies in British Columbia, or in any Province.  The duty is only to the protection of those making money on medical harvesting of babies and in research, that the Federal and the Provincial all use the tax payers money for, and no warning to the public or the public duty to protect any one child and any one drop of blood, taken without informed consent of the legal guardians of the child, the parents.

    Some of the history of this need of protection to the newborn child requiring competent training on maternity matters to the safe protection of the mother and the child not to being harmed by medical practitioners in the business of harvesting the baby's blood, began in 1998, the policies or lack of them, and the letters have been posted to the internet, at www.babybirth.com and www.123-baby-birth.com, and the most current concerns are at www.lotusbirth.com

    Every effort, but the use of the Federal Court of Canada, have been sought.  The court use is the last resort.  Order of Mandamus, it is a last hope appeal to the court. Criminal declaration to a Justice of the Peace, to speak to a Judge, is called a Laying of Information on any bodily threat to a child, to be done by policies in practice at the local hospitals, intended to continue until a Court Order of Injunction on false policies, as are indicated by the Joint-Policy-Statement of many medical organizations, intending drugs and early cord clamping on babies, and the parents, not able to stop it.  The Courts can.  The duty of the court is to be a fact finder of all involved, and in a controlled process, that the members of the public, are not protected by that organization.  

    Such procedures are the last resort, when ethics and competent and moral duty and care do no harm is not voluntarily done by nurses and doctors and the cities where their services are contracted for and/or allowed.  We must have ethical medical persons that they are competently trained and do show respect not to interfere with the child's circulation system, or rob the baby of his/her blood. Nor, allow any parental request to do that without reporting the parents as unfit for that child to remain in their care.  Some parents were seeking a child to be born, to be harvested for the child sitting on their lab, already a victim of the clamping weapon, possibly, unknown to the parents as to the original cause of the child's blood disorder or tumor, seeking the magical solution in the about to be born's child, blood supply.  

    The magical protein, is likely interferon. It was discovered in the late 1940's, and interferon fights all viruses.  It is the Grand Daddy of virus fighters, and comes out only sparingly for battle, as needed.  If the child is distressed by chemical the mother accepts and harsher labor that deprives the child of oxygen, it is likely interferon floods the child blood and is trapped in the greater blood supply yet in the placenta, that was to be transferred into the child's expanding lungs.  That process was knowingly stopped by the medical persons involved in the child's birth.  They can be seen doing c-sections and they can be seen, doing early clamping, and what is not seen, is the amount of blood deprived that child.  And what is not seen is the cost of the revival of the child, weakened by 20 to 50 percent total blood volume denied by a clamping weapon.

    In the distress of active managed births, interferon, may be used up, when released from the cells.  This protein/ hormone, may never to be replaced once released by the distressed cells.  The child's immune system is weakened. It is at that weakened state that the child is further violated by injections of diseases, by vaccinations, with heavy metals, Mercury.  We must question the allowance of the endangering of the child, by what is taught by the biology and chemical teachers, from K-12 and in the higher advanced education institutions.  Surely, they ought to have known better.

ROBBING PETER TO GIVE TO PAUL IN NEED OF A CURE?:

     Parents say, wouldn't you, too, try to spare this present child's well-being, by sacrificing the blood of the newborn child.  This if they can be revived, if too much blood is denied them after clamping off the umbilical cord with 30-seconds.  This is if they do not die and can be revived, after being weakened?

    My reply, is "No."  The duty is to protect all equally.  Even parents cannot be allowed to weaken one child who cannot give that blood lawfully, as the infant is not meeting the criteria to donate blood.  The infant is not over age 17, are not finished growing, do not know their present state of health, and are not over 110 pounds. These are the criteria of health, set by the blood banks, as to who can donate blood to another's needs.  The duty is to have the means to give legal informed consent that who blood or tissue are sought are not being weakened and treated as inferior persons, or second class persons, harvested not having their own interest and well-being placed first, as nature intended that for all.  The duty is to protect those from being harvested, so the strong do not exploit the weak. I have never seen an application to the Court for a ruling Peter, a child, a minor, can be robbed to pay Paul's debt/weakness.

    At this writing, the perceived duty of the health officials, and the elected officials would not investigate private enterprise harvesting the unprotected blood supply.  Those with a duty to protect, have been allowing the medical persons to continue to endanger the child by doing early and instant umbilical cord clamping.

    The parents assumed that was a medical benefit to their baby, early cord clamping, when it is a visual fact of science, low blood volume and pressure weakens them.  In some cases, the shock is so severe, the child cannot be quickly resuscitated, and the baby dies.  

    When a baby dies, the community Coroners are controlled, apparently, and there is no allowance of an complete and unbiased investigation of the child's care, and the possibility of where the contents of the placenta blood went.  The possibility was that many persons were involved and are concealed in their participation that the child's blood was syringed from the placenta and sent for processing into the various components of blood.

     All factual accounting records for expenses and revenue eared must be kept on such services given.  The child's own medical charts are a duty to be factual of care and treatment, but these records of the care and attention of the umbilical cord, as far as the timing of the clamping of the pulsating cord were NEVER, ever recorded or documented.  This may be direction of the doctor in charge, or by the protocol policies of the hospital's administration that may be in violation of the code of ethics of nurses, and the doctors.  The Hospital Act may not be clear on duty of proper care and treatment records maintained by all persons on the hospital premises.

    This failure of the documents of the condition and the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord absent from records is likely to be found to be true world wide.  This is not accident.  It may be put down as the conspiracy on the child's blood of the last 200 years, since 1801, when it was first written down, "Do not tie the pulsating umbilical cord, for more blood will be trapped in the placenta, that otherwise ought to be in the child.  The child will be weakened."  The words of Dr. Erasmus Darwin, the grandfather of Charles Darwin, the champion of Survival of the Fittest Philosophy. Surely the child, undrugged and not clamped of a pulsating cord, will be the blue ribbon baby and have advantages of the baby weakened.  The power and choice is with the person wielding the medical instrument and how it is used, determines if it is a tool for aid no harm done, or if the medical instrument is a weapon of potential and premeditated and voluntarily done weakening, thus, doing deleterious and planned harm.

    Nothing of the nature demands any timing of the clamping of the cord.  It need not be done, ever. Only if the cord tore, might it need to be tied. The intent to conceal the care and treatment to the child's lifeline is practiced.  Why is that?  It is a lack of respect and keeping of the facts until the child is able to have legal representation, if the parents have failed in their perceived duty to protect their child, civilly and from criminal assault on their person.  There is no good done for the child, no benefit to have been deprived enzymes, and proteins, and nutrients of the blood, needed for on-going growth process.   

___________________

SINCE 1957, ETHICAL PERSONS HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT THE WEAKENING OF THE BABIES BY EARLY UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING, AN IMPATIENCE OF APPROXIMATELY 20-MINUTES  THAT WOULD OFFER THE  ASSURANCE OF THE CHILD HAVING A QUALITY OF LIFE START:

    Some of the anemic babies have come down with cancers caused by extreme anemic conditions, others with brain tumors that began as a brain lesions, from birth, the believed result of chemicals and gases given the mother during labor.  The mother did not give informed consent, not told the dangers of any drug offered to her during labor discomfort, mostly morphines (Demerol) are offered her to simply take the edge of labor, is what most nurses tell the inexperienced mother, not telling the truth of the dangers of any drug crossing the placenta, and attacking the child's brain cells, and brain membrane.

    The next drug that is offered is a variety of muscle contracting drugs, oxytocic, they cause the blood vessels to contract and cause harsh muscle contractions.  These oxytocic drugs are abortion drugs, given to shorted the labor of the woman, and also given again to shorten the third stage of labor.  The trusting and uneducated women, accept the drugs, as no other safer options are given when they are labor discomfort. No alternatives of warm water births, not new, but used by the pioneers, are allowed in most Canadian and United States Hospitals.  Nor, are private birth rooms for the mother to be undisturbed by medical staff, for her to birth her child, unassisted, but witnessed by her own family or friends, or paid assistances, licensed or not, paid or not.  

    The threat of bodily harm to the child by these drugs, followed, by order of the World Health Organization on the oxytocic drugs, of immediate cord clamping, was written about in the 1960.  The bodily threat to the child was stated in the Chapter, Time Bomb, The Magical Child, written by the Educator, Joseph Chilton Pearce, to quote you the author's concerns, is the following passages:

• Windle...." was concerned about childbirth practices. specifically 2 questionable procedures: the widespread, automatic use of premedication and anesthetics and the usual practice of cutting the umbilical cord as soon as the baby's body was clear. There has never been a textbook on obstetrics that did NOT stress leaving the umbilical cord strictly alone so long as any activity is detectable in it.
• "He made the simplest of tests. he took pg monkeys and treated them to all the benefits of modern medical practices: he administered anesthetics in a body-weight ratio equivalent of that given the average laboring human mother in the hospital. at the birth of the infant, he cut the umbilical cord at the average time he had found practiced in hospitals. in every case, his newborn monkeys could not get their breath and had to be resuscitated.

• "The mothers, dazed by the drugs and greatly lengthened labor (which anesthetics automatically cause), could do little assist. Windle had to step in to keep the little creatures alive and how long was it before these medically delivered infants achieved some normality, got their limbs under them, and began some preliminary semsorimotor learning?  Some two to three weeks.

• "He performed autopsies on some of these helpless infants and found in every case that their brains harbored severe lesions of a type resulting from oxygen deprivation.  

• He was able to keep some of the monkeys alive (and it took outside help; it was beyond the monkey's abilities) until they had matured and achieved apparent normality.  

• When he autopsied some of these apparently recovered monkeys, he found that their brains STILL harbored exactly the same lesions found at birth. the damage done at the beginning proved irreparable .

• "He next studied human infants who had died following known birth histories of anesthetics, low Apgar scoring, premature cutting of the umbilical cord, and so on. Autopsies showed that these infant brains harbored exactly the same lesions he had found in his oxygen-deprived monkeys.

• Cases of children who had similar birth histories but who died at age three or four were then studied, and where possible, autopsies were made. again the brains were found with the same lesions.

• "Windle pointed out the obvious. in those first critical moments when the lungs must make the transition to producing all the oxygen for the young body, the system expects to call on the reserve supply held in the placenta.

• A drugged mother immediately means a drugged infant , and a drugged infant cannot get his breath . Artificial means must be used. breathing is then clumsy, slow, inefficient. The cutting of the umbilical cord at this time denied the infant the reserves of oxygen  at the most critical point in his life. A vicious double bind is imposed.

• "Newell Kephart, director of the Achievement  Center for Children at Purdue University , finds learning and behavior problems resulting from minor undetected brain injury in 15 - 20% of all children examined.

• Goldberg and Schiffman estimate that 20-40% of our school population is handicapped by learning problems that may be related to "neurological impairments at birth.

"Windle closed his report, published in Scientific American in 1969 , with this comment:

    "Our experiments have taught us that birth asphyxia lasting long enough to make resuscitation necessary always damages the brain..... a great many human infants have to be resuscitated at birth.

    We assume that their brains, too, have been damaged. there is reason to believe that the number of human beings in the USA with minimal brain damage due to asphyxia at birth is much larger than has been thought .

    Perhaps it is time to reexamine current practices of childbirth with a view to avoiding conditions that give rise to asphyxia."  

• From  Donna Young:  A Note of thanks to J.C. Pearce.  He now is involved in corrective measures to impaired and compromised persons.   In his 70's, more of his work can be found by surfing to search to find more information under the book title,  The Magical Child.    His book, can be ordered-in, through most University Libraries and Colleges, and through your local library.

Comments:

See Autistic Compensation, now an epidemic in costs to the health care system.  Surely prevention is the answer.

See Also Holes in the Heart.  Check for Search Index, or List of Contents.    www.lotusbirth.com

• Choices and no form of discrimination to women are fundamental rights of every woman to be so educated about and the endangerment to a baby by the use of drugs during labor followed with hasty clamping.  Yet, such material of such simple facts are missing in all education institutions (Kindergarten through Grade 12, then in the pre-natal classes) and truth is not made known in most reference books in the public libraries, or the public schools or in the private schools.  False information is plentiful, in total opposition of visual evidence, that can be tested over and over again, with the same results, brain damage to the fetus drugged and early umbilical cord clamped.   

• All such prenatal classes are controlled by governments and their selected and chosen consultants. It may be big money is paid for silence of those chosen to be in charge of the maternity wards, who collect the blood, and collect the organs, and where they go, in each community, for discarding is secret, as to private enterprise contracts.  Mostly, the Registered-Nurses are involved in the training of most prenatal classes, but they are governed by what can be said, and nothing can be added or subtracted, or so they have claimed, in my own community, of Dawson Creek, British Columbia.  Should there be secrets and silence if doctors are following harmful practices and they themselves have not reported false teachings and practices as child abuse?

• Doctors point to the very controlled prenatal classes to educate the expecting mothers, but all is very and carefully controlled and to be consistent not to raise any suspicion if the doctors are ethically and competently trained, as well as midwives, doulas, and the ambulance medics, as well, and the surgeons.

Being controlled there is often important information is missing.  How, then is the mother and the spouse able to protect their babies, if they cannot know the intents of the doctor, or protect the mother and her child.

• The lack of information in this Century is proving to be world-wide missing.  This is as far as my research is being able to determine who has c-section videos demonstrating taking the baby out still attached to its placenta, and the pulsation of the cord continues until full transfusion is completed, naturally.    So far, no such videos are available for correct teaching and method of care for the newborn.

• C-Section proves the function of the placenta and cord and the infant's heart doing transfusion.

• At www.123-baby-birth.com   9). T. Peltonen ,  Placental transfusion Advantage and Disadvantage. Euro. Journal of Pediatrics, 1981; 137:141-146. This article also establishes that in 87 cases of cesarean sections, the authors suspended the placenta above the infant. IRDS was not observed in any case.   

My question is who forced the stopping of correct practices for any c-section baby or vaginal birthed baby?  Was it related to hospital time-efficiency experts?  Or, those wanting the baby's blood by clamping off the umbilical cord first, then ceremonial task of cutting it, often performed by the father after the 1960's, who said, "Cool" as they cut through a pulsating cord, red, firm, and pulsating?  

• That the mothers and their spouses are NOT so informed about such choices for the delivery stage of the baby,  if they are using a family doctor or expert such as an obstetrician, gynecologists or pediatrician, or registered-nurse-midwife, or a direct-entry midwife is highly questionable.  

• Particularly, when it now known that even the World Health Organization is stating the use of oxytocins cause brain damage to the infant, and are making immediate umbilical cord clamping mandatory.   (See WHO's web address this web site for their 1998 review on the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord.  

• WHO in their summary failed to address that any research and experiments being conducted on a birthing mother and the infant and its treatment after birth ought to be respected with informed choices.  This means no clamping or cutting of the cord not causing harm to the baby is factually told the mother, and can be demonstrated today with videos of such homebirths, where the mothers are educated and NOT squeamish to see and touch the infant's Magical Organ, the Placenta and the umbilical cord of both arteries and the vein.   

• Most babies that do not have a medical person at any emergency birth are a testimony unassisted births produce healthy babies.  This fact of observances is noted in the Gunther report, No. 7,

•   See Exhibits, and Dr. Gunther's observations at http:/www.123-baby-birth.com   

Also, Dr. Morley's article, Why Babies Cry, at this web site. Dr. Morley points out, it is hypothermia, the warm baby shocked by cold air, that stops the blood transfusion, like the cold steel of a clamp, causes that cry, but remaining breathing, depends if the lungs were adequately perfused with oxygenated blood if the child will have a quality of life, or be impaired to the degree of oxygen debt to any one brain cell or nervous system.  These cells, cannot suffer oxygen or fluid debt.  They are impaired for life, as was indicated in Windle's research.  Do visit,    http://www.cordclamping.com/cry.htm

_________________

CONTROLLED GROUPS NOT ACTING IN THE VERY BEST INTEREST OF INFORMED CHOICES AND RIGHTS TO PROTECT THE CHILD FROM BEING HARVESTED AND EXPLOITED FOR THE NUTRIENTS OF THE PLACENTA BLOOD THAT OUGHT TO BE IN THE OWNER/INFANT

    As to the organization against the child, not protecting the baby, no baby is spared from this ritual and endangering trend, including already compromised premature babies. The health issue requires the assistance of International Lawyers to deal with the Nations and their official government leaders, and from community to Federal leaders.  

    This is all who have violated their duty of protection to the family and to the child.  These are the families, so far victimized by breach of fiduciary trust - do no harm. Many doctors and nurses really believe if they caused the problem and they revived the child, they did the child no harm or endangering or deprived the child of his/her rightful equality of rights, not to be endangered or weakened, at all.

    The duty is implied in the oath of the medical persons. Where no oath is taken, the duty of obligation no criminal offenses against the person, which is any threat of the person's well being, when the medical services are not a proven benefit to the person they care is imposed on, must comply in all training and practices to uphold both civil and criminal obligation to any person.  This is an obligation world wide, do no harm.  One does not use his/her medical science and medicine or policies and protocols to gain an political advantage in profits, to weaken any person.

    Any unnecessary risk taking that is not for the benefit of the person to whom a care and treatment is given (amputation of the umbilical cord) is a treatment but not a necessary procedure, it is merely cosmetic, like the circumcision ritual.  Such criminal assault or battery imposed on children are governed by an offense against the person, in most Nation's criminal laws, and there are no exceptions who can be charged with criminal offenses against the person, or who writing false medical practices, that may come under Common Nuisance, where any one person was endangered by threat of a policy written, and might be imposed on their person, or another's child.

    Policies that are able to be seen false and endangering. There are films and witnesses on the interruption of the child's umbilical cord, or the securing of the child, no harm done, by leaving the cord alone.  Appeal, begging of mothers, to leave the cord alone.  But in some cases, the mother was placed on a high operating table, the child born into the hands of strangers of unknown intent, and some did hand-squeezing off the cord, as they laughed they did not bring in a clamping tool, but squeezed and let go the child's lifeline, in a malicious intent to weaken her child, a Native boy.

    Can the cord be used as a discriminatory process to weaken some babies over another chosen and considered superior race.  Yes.  In my home town, a white male doctor's son was born and the medical staff, present at birth, was so thrilled and excited that they totally forgot to clamp the pulsating cord.  Therefore, no required sample of blood was syringed out of the placenta, for none was to be had, that was worth collecting.  

    Did the same staff get excited of the Native child's birth, born a week before?  No.  Did the medical staff weaken the child, selectively, when the mother was begging do not clamp the cord?  Yes, they did this by hand-squeezing and letting go the cord.  Was the child internally injured, yet looked apparently okay?  Yes.  When the mother took her baby for a 6-week check up, the heart murmur was so noticeable and detectable, that this doctor said, "The birth doctors and nurses could not miss it at birth and wondered why it was not recorded on the child's medical charts, 'Heat Murmur'."

    Such a child may have a threat of harm to their well-being should the child have the enthusiasm to be an athlete a runner for example, like his mother liked to run.  Now this heart murmur, if it were not detected and not watched, on serious exertion on the heart, could have caused a premature and massive heart attack.  Holes in the heart are not generally thought of as heart attacks, they are a heart problem, and that they are so common in children, is likely associated in the early clamping of the yet pulsating umbilical cord.  One in four persons have heart problems, according to the common defects of persons, Inquiry Into Life, 9th Edition, Sylvia S. Mader.

_____________________

    In Canada, the criminal code allows for Common Nuisance, Section #180 of the CCC.     

     INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUPS COLLABORATED WITH FALSE AND BOGUS POLICIES OF ENDANGERING TO THE CHILD:

    WHO is joined in the promotion of Active Management, which is drugging the mother, and cord pulling and pressing on the mother's stomach, and early cord clamping.  Those in advocacy of Active Management are some very official medical groups who have given their first-ever joint statement with the International Federation of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.  

    Members of this organization, if they belong to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), first wrote a bogus policy directing immediate cord clamping on "all" babies.  This was bulletin #216, November 1995, which can be found still promoted around the world, on the Internet..  Bulletin #216, by ACOG, had been cancelled in January 2002. But since then, the IFGO and the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) have advocated Active Management to be the first choice of training and practice and implementation at all institutions, world wide. Active Management, again, advocates early umbilical cord clamping as it is required with the use of oxytocic drugs.

     Joining, them in the Joint-Statement of Active Management are the American College of Nurse-Midwives, Johns Hopkins affiliate JHPIEGO, IntraHealth International, Inc., and Management Sciences for Health, and with support from USAID, U.S. Agency for International Development.  USAID acknowledge these groups who have joined with the philosophies involving active management, which is the use of drugs for the standard treatment for all women.  The joint-policy-statement of those with the united front, were mentioned in the USAID's press release November 7, 2003.

    The World Wide Plan is the injection of women with drugs, Oxtocin, Pitocin, Syntocinon, and Toesen.  The man-made oxytocin drug has a questionable preservatives in it, such as Chlorobutanol.  This latter substance is known to cause heart contractions problems and to cause thyroid problems and likely it messes with the blood vessel constricting in the brain, causing, too, brain injury to the baby.  

    WHO believed, to avoid brain injury to the child, that the child must be placed in a vicarious health position of anemia (low blood volume and pressure) by directing immediate umbilical cord clamping.  

    The merits of oxytocin to stop bleeding of anemic or the fear of bleeding on all mothers is questionable. Often, the injections are given without the mother knowing the consequences of hasty clamping to her child, or risk to her own health of an engorged placenta, that may leak, thereby, mixing her blood with the child's.   

    Resolution to the Problem:  There has to be a World Wide United Nations investigations on the medical leaders of the various medical groups, in each Nation.  There must be seen discipline actions and/or also monetary fines on the membership of the various organizations that have organized for purpose of their existence to protect equally, the public.  One does not choose to weaken one person for the benefit of another.  Equal means equal enforcement of the criminal law of those that violate and weaken another, and civil protection is the security of person, regardless of the age (moments old), or by mental or physical disadvantage (babies and seniors most vulnerable), or by race or color (blood types), or by marital status (marriage and social status of the mother and/or father of the child), or the family's faith/religion, or the lack of it.  

    Birth, being natural, in most instances, requires no hand's on care or treatment and this right to a no hand's on birth is the legal right of the mother to choose, even in a rented room of a hospital.  

HEALTH COSTS INCREASED, LINKED TO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT:

    This joint-policy-statement, involving many to a united push of Active Management as first choice of training all medical persons, and to be imposed in private and public institutions, has already been put into action.  We are seeing the past evidence of harm to mothers and the children in rising health care costs and in education costs.  

    In Canada, the two groups, again, who have the highest medical needs, are the children under one year of age, and the Senior Citizens.  In the United States,  they have 4 million births, per year, and their costs are stated to be $20 billion.  I suggest that budget can be reduced by 95 percent, and the remainder can be for the thousands of victimized children, some now adults, who were victims of early clamping, cold room stopping of the circulation system, and being drugged in the womb, and during birth, and had their health impaired and their choice of occupations limited, to wellness of health and/or abilities of their brain impaired to advancement of higher education and/or trades.

    There should be little cost of child birth if we return the mothers to natural birth education and practice.  The facts are, the pioneers birthed in warm water tubs, did not use drugs, eat and drank beverages as to keep up their strength, and did not tie or clamp the umbilical cord.  My folks, ages 91 and 90, to be married 67 years of marriage, Sept 5, 2004, God willing, are examples of natural birth. Their mothers simply put the placenta in a diaper and it fell off in a day or two's time.  It was buried with lime on it.  There were no needles put in their babies. There were no samples of blood taken.  Most babies born by natural birth methods, of no harm done, have lived into their 90's. Another example are the First World War veterans, some 108, and the Queen Mother, lived to 101.  This is long life and a quality of life, if we leave the lifeline alone, and do not drug the mother during labor discomfort.  That is not to say the woman is not having other natural means of support.

    Some women use the warm water birth. Some dance and move through each pain.  Many birth in gravity positions, or sideways birth, as it is also being released, flat on the back and semi-sitting birth positions, have been known, and discussed, since 1913, to have closed the birth canal up to 30 percent.  This makes labor and birth far more threatening to the mother, but the position of birth was imposed for the convenience of the medical persons, who really, should be asked to remain outside the birth room, and only allowed in as a privilege to see natural birth, that can be only the mother's hands on her baby, a truly natural birth, of her choosing. The mother is in control supported in her informed decision.  The mother I'm sure will be more satisfied and more thrilled to raise a blue ribbon baby, they really are more easier to raise, then children having constant needs of medical care, that are the result of birth trauma and harvesting, as of the past secrets of the medical arts and crafts, debated, silently in closed medical circles, past and present.  

    CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FOR VISUAL HARMFUL INTERRUPTION OF THE CHILD'S CIRCULATION SYSTEM:

    The trial of the leaders of the medical policy making groups is long over due. Hopefully, there will be jail sentences to both men and women covering up and concealing visual harmful medical practices, that could have had forensic testing that all gases and drugs cross the placenta and go into the baby's brain. There the baby's brain can be damaged.  These active management policies do harm in the masses of women and children, world wide.  

     Increases of autism are in the thousands.  The increase in the U.S.A. alone is 1 in 150 and that is increased from the 1979 World Book Encyclopedia's  statement,  that true autism, at that time, was one in 30,000.  In Canada, the Toronto Canadian Press, May 4, 2004, reported one in ten teenagers with mental and behavior problems.  Ontario is one of the Provinces that train their medical persons to do immediate cord clamping. This is true of the midwives too, who use "fear of the mother bleeding to clamp the pulsating umbilical cord.  Now we know where the policy statements are originating from.       Autism has increased in all Provinces.  

    The Class Actions for autism groups is estimated, per child, is $60,000 per year, for the life of the child, and this amounts from $4 million to $8 million dollars, and the persons so afflicted may never have a fruitful or meaningful life. In settlements in Canada, the Chow and Ing-case-law, these two Asian children, whose circulation system were interrupted, received $8 million and over $14 million for their needs, living, blind, deaf, dumb, mute, and paralyzed.

    For the present time, only vaccinations on anemic babies is alleged the problem for autism. And, to this date, the drug companies, only, are being held accountable for mercury in the vaccinations.  While these are a contributing factor, worthy of accountability to the victims, I do not believe it is only the drug companies at fault.  The babies were caused to be anemic, when they were injected.  Some of the babies were injected with 6 shots, or more, in one day.  Some of the vaccinations were with live viruses, some with killed viruses, many with a variety of preservatives, MSG, and heavy metals. All this adds up to sick children and wasted genius potential.

Medical practices and Drug corporations:

Why did a medical company,   Dupont , develop a dangerous tool for clamping off the baby's lifeline? And why did Dupont then did not warn of the consequences of 60% total blood volume deprived the child, if their tool was used for early cord clamping?  This fact, visual, is creating anemic conditions and the need of revival of the endangered baby!  The placenta nutrients will not be transfused into the baby's expanding lungs.

http://www.umbicut.com/supporting_data.html

World Health Organization

The "World Health Organization (WHO) states that early or relatively early clamping of the umbilical cord is mandatory after the administration of Oxytocin. With Umbicut ... Information from:  MP1-577 Tyvek Rx 10.3.qxd

http://www.umbicut.com/supporting_data.html

BIRTHING MOTHERS THEIR BABIES ARE ENDANGERED OF A TOXIC DRUG OFFERED OR IMPOSED DURING THE BIRTH OF THEIR CHILD:

     "In the United States and the European Community, mothers routinely receive Oxytocin to shrink the uterus during delivery.  If this drug isn't prevented from reaching the newborn through the umbilical cord, the baby's brain development can be adversely affected.

    "Consequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) states that early or relatively early clamping of the umbilical cord is mandatory after the administration of Oxytocin."

_____________________________

    The World Health Organization, at this time, is not approachable or accessible as to who all is responsible, from each Nation, for their medical directives on child birth.  Why is not WHO advocating for the birthing mother to have a signed birth contract, of what is or not done to the mother's person while giving birth, or to her child, during labor or the care and treatment of her child, after birth?  Most women, planning a family, are getting discriminated against when they are or become pregnant.  This is by the lack of informed choice of her legal rights to decline medical suggestions of her care and that of her child.  

    Most mothers cannot make an informed choice as to the risk and the right to decline the care of an active managed birth.  They are not getting factual or truthful information in the biology textbooks or in their prenatal classes.   Many children are then compromised, having to be be revived. In Canada, that rate is one in sixteen babies being revived.  See Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com      How the Umbicut is used and what informed choice is given for its use, determines if it is a tool of good to both the mother and the child.  For example, the mother is endangered by an early clamped and cut cord because the placenta remains engorged with the child's deprived blood.

AN ENGORGED PLACENTA IS A THREAT TO THE MOTHER:

    An engorged placenta is a threat to the mother as it may risk of feto-maternal transfusion .  

    Reference:  Journal SOGC, Policy #71, December 1998, page 2.  re:  Prendeville W. and Elbourne D.  Care during the third stage of labor.  In:  Chalmers I. Enkin M. Kierse M. Eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford University Press, 1989 (1991); 1145-69 Table 67.15. .  

_______________________________________

     A deprived placenta blood weakens the infant, cut off the placenta blood, of up to 60%,  to quote:

     "Placenta transfusion at birth--increase in blood volume of 60%

    "if" cord is clamped and cut "after" pulsation ceases."  

    Ref.:  Chapter, Physiology of the Newborn, Circulatory Changes, B. Blood Volume, The Lippincott Manual Nursing Practices , 3rd Edition, 1982.  

_______________________________________

    Further references was made in the Journal SOGC, Policy #71, December 1998, to quote:

     "There appears to be general agreement that delayed cord clamping is associated with placental transfusion to the baby varying between 20 and 50 percent of neonatal blood volume, depending on when the cord is clamped and at what level the baby is held prior to the clamping.  The results of two trials confirm that early cord clamping leads to heavier placentae and a higher means residual placental blood volume.  However, both trials conducted that early cord clamping reduces the length of the third stage. "  

     I ask, does a mother want to cut down 20 minutes and raise a brain injured child for the doctors convenience of time saving?

_______________________________________

NO BLOOD VALVES IN THE BRAIN'S VEIN - NOTHING TO HOLD PRESSURE THERE WHEN THE CORD IS CUT:

    I see a danger of the placenta blood being clamped off, because the volume of blood being reduced and there are no valves in the blood vessel veins  in the abdomen, brain, and lungs, or in the smaller veins (capillary system).  This may mean that the pressure and blood is not maintained in these organs when the flow of blood from the placenta is stopped by premeditated clamping off the placenta umbilical cord.  Ref.: The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. V, (Vein), p. 237, 1979.  

_______________________________________

HEART SHRINKS WITH THE PLACENTA BLOOD VOLUME AND PRESSURE IS CUT:

    In the research of T. Peltonen, " Placental Transfusion - Advantage and Disadvantage , Euro. Journal of Pediatrics, 1981 ; 173: 141-146,  he stated that in a Scandinavian Congress of Physiologists, in 1959, a film of the first breath, revealed, "If the umbilical cord is tied prior to the first breath, the result is a decrease in the size of the heart during the first three or four cardiac cycles.  Then the heart again increases in size, almost to that of the fetal heart."  

    I would think the word almost is an indication the heart was changed, perhaps, even damaged as to the now caused lower blood volume and pressure.  

    T. Peltonen explained it this way, to quote:

     "If the umbilical circulation is closed, the flow from the caudal caval vein through the via sinistra to the left heart will hardly suffice and for a moment the left heart will not have enough blood.  . . . On the basis of these observations, it would seem that the closing of the umbilical circulation before the aeration of the lungs has taken place is a highly unphysiological measure, which should thus be avoided."

    T. Peltonen acknowledge the infants, survive.  I ask, is there no battery being done?  Is there no constitutional violation of security of person being infringed on?  And, I ask, if the victim of unnecessary medical interference of their own functioning organ, if by a threat of one drop of blood, is it not battery, not done with informed allowance or need, if for one drop of blood stopped by an unnecessary clamping tool?  

     T. Peltonen, stated it this way, "Although the normal infant survives . . . under certain unfavorable conditions the consequences may be fatal."

    This can be many drops of blood, adding up to 20 to 50 percent because no one can judge the amount of blood deprived the child by a compress vein in the birth canal, and doctors doing a time convenience procedure by 30-second clamping have endangered a child needlessly.  The motive may be the collection of trapped blood in the placenta, that is being sought to sell as to the child's special blood type, even a mix of races.  That is a possibility if the doctors gain an advantage to collection of an organ or the collection of the blood, or their principle the Administration policies of the hospital, getting a cut of the distribution of blood taken from any organ obtain in services done by that institution.

    T. Peltonen indicated others concerns, too, when he stated, "Landau's observation that the high incidence of Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome (IRDS) in cesarean section infants was associated with deprivation of placental transfusion due to the technique of immediate clamping."

    T. Peltonen described a solution, he stated, "In order to prevent this, the authors suspended the placenta above the infants in 87 cases of cesarean section.  IRDS was not observed in any case."

    T. Peltonen reported the cause of Infant Respiratory Distress Sysdrome (IRDS) in that "Moss et al had reported an increased incidence of IRDS in premature infants whose cords were clamped before the onset of respiration."  In other words, the child had not even take one breath of life, before clamping off the hope line the quality of life line.  

    T. Peltonen stated that in experimental conditions with sheep , that they found that the placenta circulation functions as an extra-corporeal oxygenator of the blood, should the neonate become asphyxiated, and that the same observations was made by "Boda" with Guinea pigs.

    T. Peltonen, summarized other researchers conclusions of the importance of the placenta blood transfusion, whether animal or human, when he stated "with human beings we have found that in cesarean section the uterine circulation continues up to the separation of the placenta.  There is thus good reason in cases of resuscitation to keep the umbilical circulation intact."

_____________________________________

    Risk of Brain Damage and to the Central Nervous System:

    It is logical to perceive that that 60 percent total blood volume that is yet in the placenta, and this now stopped, the neonate's brain's blood supply is going to drop down in the vein, for the heart to send the blood to other areas of the neonate's body.  The blood flow to the brain may start the collapsing of blood vessels and capillary blood vessels.  

    The brain will be out a supply of oxygenated blood and the brain and the circulation system have the least capacity to repair after cell damage, the brain and nervous cells do not replace themselves, when they die.  

    The artery taking the blood away from the heart will have to circulate into the lungs, and the placenta blood volume and pressure is cut off, so the lungs will have to receive the blood from many other cells, who may have a limited 20 percent reserve of oxygen and fluids. These cells will have to give up their blood to aid the lungs, I would think, if the child is going to have means for the lungs to function, at all.

    If the child is given blood expanders, plasma and oxygen, he/she may live from his/her experience of trying to breathe without adequate blood volume or pressure, in his/her lungs.

    For example, the case-law of struggling children, when rived with plasma and oxygen, but living mentally and physically damaged are the Chow and Ing-case law , Ontario, Canada, handled by Roth and Sommers.

    The degree of injury to the brain and central nervous system will be to the revival of the child and additional fluids or blood expanders to take the place of that child's particular needs, per its size.  The 9-pound baby is known to need 10 ounces of blood or 300 ml.  To take away half the child's  blood or 60 percent is well in the 180 ml.  The Cells for Life Blood Bank, in Markham, Ontario, acknowledge they do collect as much, voluntarily, from uneducated parents,  who have, inadvertently, taken too much blood from infants.  The condition of the child, needlessly risked to being weakened may never be made known to the child, or why he/she has trouble in school, and in learning and remembering, or have lung, and heart problems, and are shy of enzymes and proteins, and hormones, that went to others, trapped in the placenta blood.

    Babies, need protection, not exploitation of their blood to be used as raw materials for private enterprise.  The medical groups and individual medial associations, organized for one purpose to protect the public have no good excuse as a defense in what is happening to babies, in Canada, or in the United States, or in any other Nation.  

    We have this harvesting going on in other nations.  No one is paying attention to the individual children now sick, many with a variety forms of autism, stroke problems, CP, MS, various forms of cancers and brain tumors, many different kinds of heart conditions, vision disorders, hearing, speech, and weight problems or thyroid problems.

    It is believed that if a proper open Public Inquiry was done for those with internal injuries, not by accidents, all will be found to have a common birth care cause. This is early umbilical cord clamping and drugs, and infections by any insertion of a needle in the mother body, or in the child's amniotic fluid.   

    We must question the approved policies of active management being the common factor. When the babies is yet anemic, even from injection at the hospital, the babies are continued to be injected while anemic with a variety of live viruses of diseases, as well as heavy metals of mercury (Thimersol) and other unknown trace elements in such injections.  

    The injections, continue, every two months, and thereafter. Some children were injected 14 times, on one day.  The parents are none-the-wiser, to refuse vaccinations, as being unsafe, as to the vulnerabilities of their child, following a traumatic birth.  

other references of blood loss during delivery:

    Journal SOGC, p. 62, Policy #71, December 1998, in Newton M. Mosey LM, Egli GE, Gifford WB, Hull CT. Blood loss during and immediately after delivery. Obstet. Gynecol 1961 ; 17:9-18. and Phillip AGS. Further observation on placental transfusion.  Obstet Gynecol 1973 :47-334-43.

___________________

CANADA'S INVOLVEMENT -- MOTIVE OF USING THE BABY'S PLACENTA AND PLACENTA BLOOD AND WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT :

    The questionable policy that was taking the baby's deprived placenta blood (up to 60 percent) without informed consent of "previously collected tissues) was approved, in Canada, is connected to Grant monies paid to individuals and institutions which certify compliance to the Federal level of authorities, as to the Tri-Council Policy Statement.

    The Medical Research Council of Canada, (MRC) the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, (SSHRC).  The commitment was first expressed in guide lines in the late 1970's.  Work on the joint Policy was started in 1994.   For Canada's research in stem cells, Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans , sets a precedent of "NO informed consent.

 C. Previously Collected Tissue, Article 10.3 (b), page 10.4, August 1998.  To quote:

    "When collected tissue has been provided by persons who are not individually identifiable (anonymous and anoymised tissue), and when there are no potential harms to them, there is no need to seek donors' permission to use their tissue for research purposes, unless applicable law so requires."

    Well, it seems if the parents were none-the-wiser of early umbilical cord clamping, doctors could knowingly or not, trapped up to 60 percent of the placenta blood.  The child may be revived quickly, or may not.  The placenta blood would be drained or syringed out.  The mother may have signed something saying "appropriate discarding of tissue".  They may have thought that meant burning. The various fields of medical research could then be taking the baby's placenta and placenta blood for "appropriate research controlled by the policies of the Tri-council policy statement, no informed consent, required of previously collected organs and tissue.   Again, the parents were none the wiser of the violation and weakening of their baby, or babies.

    NOTE:   Blood is a tissue because it can be transplanted, and separated in a variety of suspensions, some are: interferon and stem cells that both are worth more than gold.  Whole blood components, white cells, red cells, and platelets. In the human plasma can be found various hormones and enzymes, minerals, and vitamins.

     The Appendix I of the Tri-Council Policy Statement has the Scope of Research Requiring Ethics Review allowed for all persons to be used in science research, whether the research is funded or not (by government, allowing private enterprise the control of the collected organs; whether the funding is internal or external, whether the subjects are inside or outside the institution; whether the subjects are paid or unpaid; whether the research is conducted inside or outside Canada (36 hours and the tissue treated with Herapin (rat poison), the organs would be useable ; whether the research is conducted by staff or by students ; whether the research is published or not ; whether the focus of the research is the subject (can be a project that used the subject's tissue) ; whether the research is observational, experimental, correlational or descriptive ; whether the research is to acquire basic or applied knowledge ; an whether the research is primarily for teaching, training purposes, or whether the primary purpose is the acquisition of knowledge.  

     The Appendix 2, Ethical conduct for research involving humans allowed for biomedical research, at least one member is knowledgeable in the relevant law ; this is advisable but NOT MANDATORY for other areas of research ; at least one member has no affiliation with the institution, but is recruited from the community served by the institution.

     Nothing would, necessarily, stop the research but the allowance of Rule of Law to those directly involved, to quote Article 1.5 (d) "Such research should not be blocked through the use of harms / benefits analysis or because of the potentially negative nature of the findings. The safeguard for those in the public arena is through public debate and discourse and, in extremis, through action in the courts."

    The use of the courts is Rule of Law.

     NO POLITICAL OR PUBLIC DEBATE ON HARVESTING THE BABIES:

    It is interesting that the public arena through public debate has not taken place on the harvesting of the newborn citizen. The public, is largely not aware because the issue was blocked by the major news medias, who were controlled only to support research of stem cells, and taken from the newborn  babies.

    Those that did not give full video of the amount of blood deprived a child, like CBC, or its affiliate, CTV, who did stories on TV, just would not tell the public early umbilical cord clamping was not a medical need or benefit to those babies this was done to.  By their silence, I am of the opinion these major news media did not do fact finding or keep the public alerted to the risks of causing weakened babies, not only in Canada, but in developing Nations, as well.

    The description of stem cells, in my opinion, has been dishonest and the facts of 180 ml taken from 300 ml of total blood volume, of a 9-pound baby, never was clearly told the public at large.  This is a medical disgrace of the silence of so many persons we believed and trusted to do no harm. They really believed if they revived the child, they did not harm.  They lie.

•      One in sixteen babies, born in Canada, have been revived babies.  Neonatal Resuscitation:   The NRP guidelines ,  Elliott Robert D,.MD, FRCPC, Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa Hospital - General Site, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Web Site:   http://www.anesthesia.org/winterlude/w195/w195_7.htm
•      One in 10 teenagers, living in Toronto, where there several cord blood banks, are having mental problems.  Peace River Block Daily News, May 6, 2004, p.6
•      The greater increase of cancers are now between the ages of  4 and 40.  (See references: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
•      One in sixteen babies born have minor to serious defects . Inquiry Into Life, 9th Edition, Sylvia S. Mader
•      One in four persons have heart problems. Inquiry Into Life, 9th Edition, Sylvia S. Mader

LEGAL CASE-LAW on Umbilical Cord Clamping, REFERENCES:  

• R.D. Miller, ed., Anesthesia, 2nd ed. (New York:  Churchill Livingstone, 1986 ). " early cord clamping could result in a depressed neonate.   (Reference used in Reasons for Judgement, compromised child immediate cord clamped, "  Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, Sommers and Roth law firm.

• D. Nathan and F. Oski, eds., Hematology of Infancy and Childhood,  3rd ed. (Philadelphia:  W.B. Saunders Co., 1987), Dr.    Oski states at page 30:

     "In general an acute loss of 20 percent of the blood volume is sufficient to produce signs of shock and will be reflected in a fall in hemoglobin levels within three hours of the event. "  (Reference to:  "Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, Sommers and Roth law firm.

____________________________________________

The Concerns of a Canadian Mother and Grandmother, Donna Young, you can call me if you like:  (1-250-782-9223)

    There are many medical clinical randomized trials used as though a medical law in directing training of the medical persons.  The training and policies are being, in many cases, imposed on uneducated and uninformed women.

    "This Conclusion of a review of Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labor, Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S., Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Commbe Lying-inHospital, Dophin's Barn, Dublin 8, Ireland stated:

    "Routine 'active management' is superior to 'expectant management' in terms of blood loss, post partum haemorrhage, and other serious complications of the third stage of labor. Active management is, however, associated with an increased risk of unpleasant side effects (eg nausea and vomiting), and hypertension, where ergometrine is used.  Active management should be the routine management of choice for women expecting a single baby by vaginal delivery in a maternity hospital. The implications are less clear for other settings including domiciliary practice (in developing and industrialized countries).

    The Description of Studies, were from 16 years ago, and the most current being in 1998.  The reports used were:  Bristol, 1988, Dublin 1990; Brighton 1993; Abu Dhabi 1997; and Hinchingbrooke 1998.  *

    The *underlined reports  did not report (Apgar) scores of the neonate.  The report is from the Cochrane Database Syst Rev.March 09, 2000;CD000007 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/  Cochrane review, the Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library (ISBN 1464-780X) 2004, Issue 2, John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2004.

______________________________________

    Other Reports on Management of the third stage of labor: an evidence-based approach , Mary C. Brucker CNM DNsc, FACNM published, Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, Volume 46, Issue 6, November-December 2001, p 381-392.  This report compared active management that includes routine use of cord traction and uterotonins, whereas, expectant management can be characterized as one of watchful waiting.  

    It stated in absense of research of the use of herbal therapies, homeopathic remedies, that the author believed on the basis of current studies, if a decrease in postpartum bleeding or avoidance of manual removal of the placenta is desired, they supported an active approach to third stage that the authors thought should be adopted until and unless contradictory findings are published.  

    Again, women may not have had free and total choice of no drugs and no clamping of the umbilical cord.  

    Mary Brucker c