One in Sixteen babies having to be revived in Canada

The Neonatal Resuscitation Policy Guidelines, put out by the Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa has revealed that one in sixteen babies are now requiring to be revived, reference: Neonatal Resuscitation:   The NRP guidelines ,  Elliott Robert D,.MD, FRCPC, Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa Hospital - General Site, University of Ottawa, Ottawa

Web Site by Donna Young

There is a means to stop that risk taking.  It was proven in an American Hospital, where Dr. George M. Morley was in charge directed full delayed clamping of the infant's lifeline practiced.  The results were a 70 percent reduction of babies needing revival.

Dr. George M. Morley advocates that a revived child is a compromised and impaired child to the degree of deprivation of oxygen and blood volume and pressure.  Many children who were victims of hasty clamping are vulnerable to then holes in the heart, and learning and behavior problems.  

The common cause of these children being weakened by hasty umbilical cord clamping has been directed by professional policies of the experts, the Societies of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Canada and the United States.  The babies have been endangered and risked, unnecessary, to internal damages. (ACOG, Policy #216, November 1995, SOGC, Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89, May 2000.  Only Policy #216 has been cancelled as of January 2002.

It is common logic that any interruption and destruction of any one cell, not communicating with another cell, and one cell may lead the directives of 10,000 other cells.

The motive I perceive in leading medical persons to follow wrongful medical policies is the harvesting of the babies for their sought after stem cell blood to be used in science research.  This involves private labs collecting human organs, and stem cells, taken from the placenta of the babies.  

The public is not being protected from higher education costs to educate impaired and compromised babies, needlessly caused that way by wrongful birth practices.  

The public is not being protected from higher medical costs involving the care and duty to help the now impaired children.  That is alleged to be one in sixteen, but may be actually higher.  The children appear physically normal as the injuries are internal and many latent as to diagnoses, taking from 3 years to the ages of 9, to recognize an impaired child.

We can imagine one cell directing 10,000 other cells, damaged, and cell is smaller then the period at the end of this sentence (.).  That is the same size or smaller of the egg of the woman, before conception.   Look at the gaps of a damaged cell.

............ . . ...............   The cells are a universe to themselves, that communicate with all other cells in close range.  Some cells give off hormones that go to another part of the body.  This would be normal of connecting cells..........................................................  No gaps.

In most cases, the mother and father have not be truthfully informed how to protect their baby from endangering at organized hospitals all doing the same risk taking, if the mother births on their premises.  

The mother and father are not having or do not know to have signed birth contracts what the doctor training or past habits have been; or, the policies of the hospital, or any medical group who may be directing risk taking on their baby. Only a court can direct risk taking on babies and to have their placenta blood deprived them for another's interest, and what Judge would do that to a helpless child?

The revival of the compromised child, struggling off his her lifeline, set by polices are questionably unsound.  This is because they are directing hasty clamping to remove the child from the hope of revival from his own means of continued transfusion of blood to the child's body, if the heart is restarted.  They then, wasting precious moments, rush the child down to another room, where equipment is there, and not available in the delivery room.  Many hospitals are inadequately prepared to be experts of child delivery or have experienced no hands-on birth, a natural birth and warm water births with no drugs given to the mother at her informed consent.

The logic of revival is in the best interest of the child, and while it is most unpleasant for the medical worker, the revival is logical to be done between the legs of the mother.  

I am sure if the mother is prepared in such a situation, she would prefer immediate revival for the child to use his her own blood.  This is safer, in most instances, if the blood is not toxic, rather than use artificial blood or a stranger's blood, with unknown risks of disease.  

The artificial blood, called Ringer's Lactate.  It is logically shy of nutrients, hormones, and enzymes which are in the placenta blood and are created and essential for the child's future growth and sexual development to be normal.

Here is the evidence of one in sixteen babies being required to be revived.

1. Neonatal Resuscitation:   The NRP guidelines ,  Elliott Robert D,.MD, FRCPC, Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa

 Hospital - General Site, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Web Site: http://www.anesthesia.org/winterlude/w195/w195_7.htm   

 ( One in sixteen babies will require resuscitation*  of some kind in the delivery room).

*Remarks: No doubt with hasty clamping causing the child to go limp

(Reference: Chow-Case-Law.   www.sommersandroth.co m)

________________________________

Protect Babies and Mothers Too Petition :   www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

(1)  References:    www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm   (Listed are just some of the books studied are listed. It is a start of information known for a very long time).

(2)  Home Page :   Table of Contents :   www.lotusbirth.com

Contact DONNA, MOTHER AND GRANDMOTHER:   dyoung@pris.ca