Criminal Codes & Declarations in Canada to Consider for a Laying of Information on injuries caused to babies who were victimized by Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping

Criminal Codes and the Constitution: Research by Donna Young

The correct treatment and duty under the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides that all human beings have a right to expect, security of person and equal protection.

This is regardless of age, (live born infant), sex, color, race, social status within the community, mental and/or physical disadvantages (infants who cannot defend themselves).

This must be expected to be upheld by the Nation's medical institutions. This is so babies and their birthing mothers do not die while in the care of those who should be trained to be adequately trained medical person, ethical, skilled in duty of law and medicine. This then would provide for proper facts of empirical science medical treatment and a logically perceived duty.

Under Section 180, CCC, below, see the Blood Task Force as an example of criminal charges taken on the negligent medical care on the blood supply. The same must be considered for the birth of babies that they are not exploited for their placenta blood. Nor, their mothers are not exploited to produce babies that the Provinces are then not exploiting the child for his/her blood supply.

In Canada, that is happening. Many babies are being immediate cord clamped, and the blood trapped in the placenta is regarded then the property of the medical institute to do as they wish.

The amount wrongfully deprived the child by newly trained doctors only in early cord clamping, is 20 to 50 percent total blood volume of the child's. Some older doctors and midwives are being asked to change their ways, or not speak out on the threat to the child by immediate cord clamping.

The child is left a weaker baby, some may die, and some have died. Those babies that did die, after a live birth, were not adequately investigated by the Coroners. Many of them may not be adequately trained on the new trend, nor, seem to want to, nor perhaps, know how to check out such unexpected infant deaths for inadequacy of their own blood, and how they were treated during labor, and after birth. Nor, it seems to want to investigate the placenta for facts of drugs from the medical person's care, and if the placenta was drained for any amount of blood, and how much; or taken, even from the 22 inch cord.

Laying of Information is an attempt to bring to the Court's attention the needless deaths of infants attributed and/or caused by immediate umbilical cord (lifeline) clamping.

Battery to Living Victims: This immediate umbilical cord clamping is unnecessary, dangerously endangering but is a new trend, apparently, now being taught universally.

Injury to the Brain's Development: Science today, states poisons to the child's brain, by such medical drugs kill brain cells permanently along with immediate cord clamping. These brain cells, like all other cells are not removed. Brain lesions from the dead cells are known to be the result, they can, any time turn to tumors and cancers.

Criminal Fiduciary Trust Breached: We must deal with unpleasant breaches of trust and concealment of deaths and injury to infants. We must deal with the issue of human organs and blood a viable commodity on the open market not specifically protected with rules, nor a family's DNA privacy by science research, involving humans.

DNA PRIVACY BREACHED: DNA is getting into the hands of unknown strangers in research by the placenta blood sent to labs and to drug companies. Ethics Boards in Hospitals are involved in approving that without informed consent of their patients. In the birth of the infant and the taking and using the placenta in science, both sides of the family's DNA and right to privacy are being breached.

DUTY TO OUR NEIGHBOUR: If society does not question, then we become vulnerable to assumed rights of the State to take from us or our duty to give with or without our consent, lowering the quality of living in a Democratic Society, Canada alleges to be.

Only the Constitution, Criminal codes, Human Rights declarations, Coroner's duty and Act, Professional Act give some kind of duty to protect all the public, equally.

Golden Rule, Supremacy of God, Rule of Law: We do not exploit one for the other without informed choice and consent. NO infant has a duty or responsibility to give up his/her stem cells for the good of science when they were made for his/her own individual needs and fast growth.

An example of protest of human cells and DNA codes wrongfully used in science, from one adult, and without consent, is the John Moore Case Law. In this case, this man did not give consent for development of cells from his body. The use of his DNA structure created $3-Billion to the doctor and the lab. The doctor was in conflict of interest in the cells taken from this man's spleen, regardless it was removed for alleged disease.

The more valuable than gold components of marketable blood products are: enzymes, hormones, white cells, red cells, stem cells, plasma, platelets, to name a few all being extracted from the infant's placenta without informed consent or the protection the infant/owner gets all these benefits to be a healthy long-lived person.

See Constitution and Coroner's Act, Professionals Act, and more at: http://www.123-baby-birth.com/constitution

CRIMINAL LAYING OF INFORMATION: If you want to start or participate in a Criminal Action, by Laying of Information in your own City, and/or begin a civil Class Action of two or more persons, and they can be from the "same" family, contact me.

CLASS CIVIL ACTIONS: An example of a likely violated children now having learning problems, all from one family, stating all of her children had drugging during birth followed by immediate cord clamping. No genetic disorder, outside of drugs during medical delivery being the cause, were proven.

She cannot get adequate school tutoring for the children to reach their dreams and fullest potential, because IQ for adequate education help is cut off at an IQ of about 50. Children can complete school with IQ's of 50 and not be able to read, write, or spell, as is the situation for some of her children.

CANADA

Draft, criminal codes are below:

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

This is a Sworn Declaration (Part I) of Laying Information of Donna Young, of Dawson Creek, British Columbia, hereinafter, called the Informant.
1.1 The Laying of this Information is in regards to the uninvestigated cause of death of the infant child, XXXX XXXXX, born and died on October XX, 2000 and that Informant states a Judge's Coroner's Inquiry is reasonable and needed to be a fact-finder as to the cause of the child's death, to prevent future deaths of any other infant of an unnecessary death, after birth, as much as possible as to best practice possible in care and treatment that would prevent such deaths.
2.1 Such artificial hormone-drugs contain trace elements and preservatives of a questionable nature alleged harmful to the infant if it gets into their blood stream. (WHO). A (DNA) test can find the trace elements attributed to this drug and any other drug given the labouring mother. These drugs are paid for by the Medical Plans, that are also directly or indirectly also paying for the treatment of the infant umbilical cord clamping and cutting, and the time and condition of the cord when clamped, thus amputated. It is known the clamping and the cutting are unnecessary procedures and ICC and ECC only done in the rarest of necessities. And if done, hastily, routinely must be followed with corrective measures to attempt to minimize internal injuries to the infant imposed on by such questionable treatment to his/her lifeline. Treatment following ICC and ECC is blood transfusion of risk to the infant for bloodborne diseases and oxygen with risks of blindness as to the care in administering 100 percent oxygen.
2.2 This procedure of ICC and/or ECC NEVER is shown on a medical film as being a necessary practice. The Informant alleges this is "bad faith" having no films of education existing to demonstrate good faith when and if it is done, documenting a benefit to the infant having it done to, followed in good faith the proof of how much blood is or is not in trapped in the placenta, by draining the placenta on the same video, with no editing.
2.3 The Policy directing written documentation of the care and treatment to the mother (drugging, frequency, quantity, and all nature of care to her, and to the infant's birth and care and treatment to his / her organ after birth, the umbilical cord and the placenta. There are Policies in Manuals of recording factually the care of the individual/s.
2.4 The Informant believes this bad faith when these are not done and is implied destroying or withholding of evidence, which impedes justice to those who may those documents at a later date. Such Policies are in the Manuals of the Colleges of Midwifery, Nursing and/or Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons. Exhibits: _______________________
- The mother of the deceased child is XXX XXXXX:
  - The birth attendants were: Dr. XXXXX XXXXX, a new doctor, trained in the United Kingdom; and an ambulance attendant, known only as, Mr. X, believed employed at the Dawson Creek and Regional Hospital and likely trained by the Justice Institute of British Columbia. JIBC train medics in clamping a still pulsating umbilical cord. This endangers the newborn child, rather than waiting for all pulsating to cease; or if the Mother informed of no clamping or cutting preventing cord blood infections, trauma to her child, by being told this right, prefers that.
4.1 NO CLAMPING OF CORD: This no-clamping/cutting method was used by unassisted births of the Pioneers, and around the world is still practiced in some of the developing nations. The method, in good faith of no harm done to the infant and with many benefits, is presented on Video by a qualified medical person, Dr. XXXX, trained in Obstetrics. Her Sworn Declaration is included with the video for the Judge's review and consideration of a trial. Exhibits: __________
4.2 Full-delayed Clamping, taught to doctors of the past which is waiting for all pulsation in the umbilical cord to cease before clamping and cutting is supported by a retired Obstetrician and Gynaecologists, Dr. XXX XXXXX, whose Statement, Notarized is attached. Exhibits: __________. In his writings and in his personal communication with me, Dr. XXXXX qualifies when visual and science facts indicate and real necessity to clamp off a pulsating lifeline, these being: a torn cord; placenta accidentally cut for a placenta previa condition. Exhibits: ______________
4.3 A third possible reason given by the World Health Organization (WHO), but not substantiated by facts of medical research alerted to the general public, is the use of the artificial hormone-drug, generally called Oxytocins. That synthetic hormone goes by a variety of brand names and have a variety of possible toxic trace elements and preservatives in them that requires immediate cord clamping if the child is not to have brain development disabilities. The local Dawson Creek and District Hospital gave me a list of ingredients and preservatives commonly known in this drug: Exhibits. _____________
5.1 All medical persons are trained in self-protection of bloodborne diseases by the proper use of gowns, gloves, and masks, all are part of emergency preparations to aid a person, where-they-are. Generally, best practice possible, was NOT to remove infant's from their lifeline, but aid the lifeline to continue the blood and oxygen transfusion "until" the cord is white/silver, limp, and NOT pulsating, and the infant's tongue and lips are NOT blue.
5.2 After the child's birth, any assistant provides external help that is logical: warmth, blankets, massage, clearing with a clean cloth or clean fingers the infant's nose and mouth; warmth is provided by placing the infant on the mother's person, still attached to its lifeline, wrapped in a warmed towel; the placenta put in a warm towel if it is extracted quickly. The heat allowing continued blood flow, the cold clotting the blood.
5.3 These are basic long-known emergency birth procedures and may be practiced in all births wherever the infant is born in a planned hospital environment; home-birth or an unplanned emergency. It is now known as a medical fact of science that semi-sitting births and flat on the back births are harmful to both mother and child, that side-ways births and gravity births of the mother's means and choice are best for a safe delivery and quick blood transfusion from placenta into the infant. The best practice possible for the XXXXX child is believed to have been violated, perhaps it is manslaughter, infanticide, medical negligence and malpractice that a fact-find Coroner's Inquest is in the best interest of the general public, to prevent such future deaths to infants or serious long-term injury as to deprivation of essentials for quality of life, life itself, oxygen and blood.
5.4 The Informant provides the Criminal Codes and Human Rights Declarations that protects all individuals, equally, regardless of age, mental and or physical disabilities, as would be the case of a vulnerable newborn infant, dependent on best practice possible, a directive of the local Dawson Creek Hospital's Ethics and to be followed by allowed accepted staff working in Emergency or as Staff or permission to aid patience on or off the Hospital's premises. Best practice possible is for sustaining life, and quality of life, minimizing endangering practice that do the opposite, as to causing internal injuries or risks of it.
Expert No. 1: Dr. XXXXX is believed to have influenced the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to cancel their medical malpractice Policy #216 November 1995 as of January / February 2002. This policy falsely directed immediately clamping on all infants; yet, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, (SOGC) have failed to cancel Policy #89 May 2000 misleading Canadian doctors and other medical persons to do immediate umbilical cord clamping leaving our infants vulnerable to injury, subtle to serious (chow-case-law), to even death. The infants denied and deprived blood of a significant amount 20 to 50% total blood volume of the infant's, without parent's consent, in most instances, goes to stem cell research. Exhibits:
10.1 Expert No. 2: Dr. XXXXX has provided evidence of fact of no clamping or cutting is necessary for "undrugged" infants, a video. This method was the right of mothers of the past, and was never stopped in some areas of the world. A child drugged for reason to further hinder his blood and oxygen transfusion is not a fact of science I am aware of. Exhibits: ____________
10.2 The method of NO Clamping or Cutting the Umbilical Cord was used in unassisted births in Canada by the Pioneers prior to 1914 and for only a short time following the war, to about 1923. Fact, my parents, now age 89, are facts of such home births, of no drugs and no interference with the umbilical cord. The method of no clamping, as women become aware of their legal rights, is now being revived. The method has now been called the Lotus Method.
10.3 The only down-side of this method, is it will deprive the medical sciences of getting the infant's placenta blood trapped there by a clamp. However, mature adults who can make an informed choice can give of their blood or stem cells from their own bones.
10.4 The Informant believes unnecessary early cord clamping was likely a cheap supply of 1/2 to 1 cup of blood per infant born in USA and Canadian hospitals. Much of Canada's directives are from the States. Until the 1970's the USA paid for blood, so taking the blood from an infant's placenta that was early clamped, was likely routinely done, and is now done by many of the hospitals in Canada, such as stated as fact, the Royal Alexander Hospital in Edmonton, and it is believed done in all hospitals in British Columbia, including the local Dawson Creek and Regional Hospitals in the area, which the lab technicians can be polled as to their source of blood and if that blood is taken from the infant's placenta, or drained from the infant, themselves.
10.5 The Informant alleges that after the discovery of typing the blood (ABO) the doctors and the politicians soon after in 1914, by political clout and no evidence of better safety to birth in hospitals or with the governments trained medical agents by their agencies, were safer to birth a child behind closed doors, where the birthing mother had no witnessed unbiased to her treatment and her care, no husband or mother or father or brother or sister there for her support, until this changed in the late 1960's.
10.6 The government continues to place fear into the reproductive system of the women by implying she will go to jail if she naturally births her infant, unassisted, and/or with a person she has confidence and her choice of care. Exhibit:
The Informant alleges there is a local doctor trained in full delayed clamping, trained at the University of British Columbia who, by the Court's discretion, may questioned him, by a Court Order if necessary, and that is Dr. XXXXX.
The Informant alleges there is a witness to his delayed clamping, waiting for all pulsation to cease and having healthy living infants, and the witness of such a birth with care from Dr. XXXX, is XXXX XXXXXX business address at:
12.1 The Informant alleges a witness of another's doctors immediate cord clamping, during c-section, not a necessary practice as all c-section babies can be taken out with their placenta and cord still attached for full blood transfusion while the surgeon deals with the mother, is a father of such a child, immediate clamped, the cord cut, then the infant taken out and assisted to breathe, with moments of anxiety if she would or NOT off her lifeline, is Mr. XXXXXX, of Dawson Creek.
12.2 The Informant alleges a doctor to talk to doing immediate cord clamping, and who may training others to do the same, as he is an alleged Obstetrician and Gynaecologists, is Dr.XXXX XXXX. His name is provided for confirmation of immediate cord clamping as the new trend in umbilical cord clamping and that the parents, the legal guardians of the infant this is imposed is without informed consent or choice for no clamping or cutting of the cord, for hours, if not days, or if they want natural healing and drying for no endangering of cord infections, and no deprivation of blood to their infant. T. Peltonen did research taking babies out during c-sections still attached to their placenta and cord, with no harm to the babies and preventing the commonly caused lung disorder (RDS) in infants common to c-section babies taken off their pulsating cords, is provided as an Exhibit that no clamping of any baby, c-section or vaginal birth Need not be done. Exhibit _________.
12.3 The Informant alleges another doctor, the Administrator and Registrar of the College of Physicians and Surgeons, having the duty to protect the public from needless and endangering practicing and permitting immediate cord clamping to go on, in Dawson Creek, and across the Province of British Columbia, is Dr. XXXX CPSBC, telephone number is 1-800-461-3008. He called hasty clamping a "trend."
12.4 The Informant alleges a Deputy Registrar, of CPSBC, XXXXXX, who wrote in April 6, 1999, stating no infant was being endangered because all doctors were being adequately trained and knew and did practice full delay clamping of the umbilical cord, waiting, patiently for all pulsation to cease before clamping or cutting the cord. Exhibit ____________.
12.5 The Informant provides a witness of a child's birth, the treatment of the child by immediate cord clamping, likely the iatrogenic caused observable disorders of the child, in all appearance of physical well-being, is Jane Thompson, a local resident. Exhibit:
12.6 The Informant provides a witness of a positive homebirth, where the umbilical cord was not detached for hours, waiting for the midwife to arrive, is XXXXX, of Pouce Coupe. Exhibit: ____________
12.7 The Informant alleges almost any parent of the past two years can be questioned and sought information from, so others may come forward at the discretion of the Court to hear further evidence of endangering of infants, or proper care and attention by the care person/s. Exhibits Unknown Authors X Y ______. Other Midwives and Obstetricians against hasty clamping have provided published articles.
__________________________________________
23. 1 The Informant was given information that major media such as CBC have an understanding NOT to release medical information, policy and practice without that statement, which means the public is prejudicially NOT informed or warned.
23.2 The facts of correspondence were that all major press medias only have given support to taking the blood of the infant by doing hasty clamping, draining the blood from the placenta for stem cell research backed by the Federal Government's grant of some $4- billion dollars. All major news media CBC and the Canadian Press-Chain owned papers, including those locally, refused to put an investigative reporter on this reproductive health issue or to do the same four-year research I have conducted.
23.3 The Informant's research has been voluntarily, with no financial compensation and I have no conflict of interest or malice in bringing this matter to the Court's attention for a Coroner's Inquest to be a fact-finder in the cause of this infant's death, and other infant deaths, as they may surface. What may be involved are: infanticide, negligence, manslaughter by wrongful medical judgement depriving the infant of necessities of life, blood and oxygen, as was provided by his own means, by clamping off that hope of quality of life, the lifeline, the umbilical cord.
23.4 The Informant's research, educational, is posted at: web site: www.123-baby-birth.com is educational on this issue and other concerns for the well-being of all children. The last current uploading is on disk for the Court's consideration, and the original web site: www.123babybirth.com and its web stat at: www.123babybirth.com/webstat; the Constitutional Education web site at: www.123-baby-birth.com/constitution. All on disk.
23.5 The Informant's alleged Conspiracy of Secrecy is also on the disposal of human organs and the blood, and the placenta and blood trapped in it by a clamp. Communication for information on the disposal of human organs and blood was not given such information by those who had means to disposal of such: MLA, Elizabeth Kidd, Hospital Administration.
23.6 The Informant alleges hasty clamping is an Unconstitutional violation of security of person and needlessly endangering. It is also endangering to the privacy of the infant as to DNA going to outsiders without informed consent in the use of stem cells. When the parents may wish and have the right to protect their privacy with witnessed burning of the placenta and contents. The taking of such DNA in the infant's blood and used in stem cell research is alleged by the Informant, a breach of fiduciary trust. One such case, that Judge favored the medical science rights to private blood and DNA was the John Moore case. It was appealed and later settled out of court, but the doctor had a conflict of interest in this man's cells, and received with his lab technician some $3-billion dollars using unconsented cells from the spleen of John Moore. It is alleged this matter was settled out of court, the sum rumored to be a mere $500,000. Exhibit.
23.7. The Informant alleges civil rights to the individual, the infant are being violated as well as the legal guardians of the two parents and their families as to the Informant's belief and knowledge in science that the DNA of both families are being possibly exposed to strangers that have not had permission to have access to such private information.
23.8 The Informant believes that those involved in the picking up of the human organ (placenta) and blood, may be Browning Farris Industries, BFI and/or their agents; but that is NOT confirmed for the Northern Regions.
23. 9 The Informant states, if true, BFI is an American corporation that takes the human organs into the States, and what and how any human organs are disposed of or used in research and science is not revealed to the public.
23.10 The Informant alleges there should be no secrets on the matter of health, so I believe, of policies and administration and disposing of human wastes and blood containing DNA codes; or the use of them in science, particularly, not without informed consent of the individual.
23.11. The Informant believes this application for a Coroner's Inquest on the cause of the infant's death and the disposal of his organs and/or blood, is in the best interest to the protection of the public, at large. The public currently unaware of new trends of medical practices imposed on the newly trained medical persons, changes and threat to the individual, the new born infant, being imposed on to donate blood by deceitful means of clamping off the lifeline, while it is still pulsating. This practice, done with intent of the doctor but the intent of the training and the practice was NOT authorized by the parents, or their informed choice no clamping or cutting is necessary at all.
23.12 The Informant alleges those stated above did conceal and did intend to NOT get the necessary information or failed in their perceived duties they accepted as authorities of some capacity, and have done so to the date of this filing.

On October 4, 1993,an Order of Council (PC 1993-1879) authorized a Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada, pursuant to Part 1 of the Inquiries Act. The Honourable Mr. Justice Horace Krever was appointed commissioner, and public hearings began November 22, 1993.

Immediately after the Krever Commission’s report was published in November 1997, the RCMP received complaints from individuals and organizations alleging criminal wrong-doing within the blood distribution system in Canada.

On December 22, 1997, the RCMP announced it would conduct a review of the findings of the Krever Commission of Inquiry into the Blood System in Canada to determine whether there were grounds to launch a criminal investigation.

At the completion of the review process, on February 12, 1998, the RCMP announced that it was launching a full scale criminal investigation into the blood distribution system in Canada. The RCMP Blood Task force was created and a 1-888 number (1-888-530-1111) was established to receive information from the public.

Commissionof Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada (Krever Report) available at: J. N. Desmarais Library (REF-DOC CA1 Z1 93B02).

News Editors/News Directors Note: Further information on the RCMP Blood Task Force including a Media Guide which accompanies this news release can be found on the RCMP Blood Task Force website at: www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/html/bloodtaskforce.htm
Media Contacts: Corporal Michele Paradis
RCMP Media Relations “O” Division (Toronto)
(416) 715-2375 (pager)
(905) 691-3952 (cell)
(416) 952-4619 (office)

Corporal Louise LaFrance
RCMP Media Relations “A”Division (Ottawa)
(613) 786-8820 (pager)
(613) 993-8820 (office)

OTHER CRIMINAL SECTIONS:

S.215 (1) (a) (c) (i) (ii) (2) applies to (1) (a) (3) Duties Tending to Preservation of Life .
- (Comment: Duties are not to endanger by medical practices to do NO harm as is a fiduciary trust believed in the training and practice and ethics of any medial person).
S. 219 (1) (a) (b) (2) Criminal Negligence (omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do).
- (Comments: This may include concealing of the facts of treatment, destroying of evidence; waiting patiently for all pulsation to cease, while keeping the infant warm and cleaning the nose and mouth passages with a clean finger or clean cloth. NOTE: aggressive syringes and bulbs can gag a child, put him/her into heart failure).
S.220 (a) (b) Causing Death by Criminal Negligence
- (Comments: Immediate cord clamping without visual and documented cause is criminal negligence and teaching by advocating aiding and abetting not thinking some people will follow false directives and training by fear of a Supervisor's power that expects to not be challenged in a Court of Law or peer review).
S.221 Causing Bodily Harm by Criminal Negligence
- (Comments: Endangering of iron deficiency by deprived 20 to 50 percent of blood is bodily harm, leading to shock and death, in some cases).
S.222 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Homicide
- (Comments, homicide is not necessarily intentional. The immediate and early cord clamping is "intentional" of the doctors choosing to do that and failing to reveal their training and their intent to do that by their convenience and choice "after" they have seen the colour of the child and its condition of birth, small or large, and the "sex" of the child, so ICC and ECC are not unintentional).
S.223 (1) When child becomes human being (a) (b) (c); (2)
- (Comments: The XXXXX infant was a full Canadian Citizen had required Security of Person and Equality for protection and investigation).
S.224 Death which might have been prevented .
- (Comments: The XXXXX child may well be an okay infant, alive and well today, if what I believed transpired, immediate clamping, had NOT happened, and a fact-finder by the three-witnesses requires his death be investigated).
S.225 Death from treatment of injury
- (Comments: Immediate cord clamping is a treatment and was imposed, in all probability on a still functioning organ or an organ that would have been function by heart massage and oxygen assistance, the beating of the cord Is the Heart Beat of the infant's).
S.226 Acceleration of death
- (Comments: Early and Immediate cord clamping on a small infant is acceleration of death and it was an perceived outcome of hasty clamping of shock).
S.240 Accessory after the fact to murder
- (Comments: All those after the death that failed to report the need of an Inquiry, Hospital Ambulance Attendant, local Coroner, Prince George Coroner and Vancouver Coroner contacted in November 2000); Funeral Home may all be accessories "after" the fact of death was made to them of an infant able to survive if given the essentials of life. They may also be concealing the use of the infant's placenta blood and/or other organs, making this infant a victim of possible pre-knowledge of special cells of use to science and/or medical transplants, such knowledge available on previous medical records of XXXX XXXXX). Mixed race if that is her situation are short in supply of such blood wanted for research, not just specific blood types and fact-finder of the Court to be able to obtain this information and all of the above and below rights to fact-finder Coroner's Inquiry).
S.341 Fraudulent Concealment
- (Comments: Destroying evidence of the placenta and how much blood was yet contained in it is common practice nurses and doctors and failing to accurately and factually fill out statement of medical fact the condition of cord when clamped, and the time clamped such as immediate at birth, 30-seconds after birth; at the presentation of head, shoulder or whole person of the infant). This is the definition of conceal and/or of destroying evidence as to the interpretation of the Informant. I believe Policy #13 of the College of Physicians and Surgeons, who also had control over Midwifery Practices, directs factual keeping of treatment of any person, that by the Equality of Persons of the charter directs so for infants at birth and after birth.).
S.430 (5.1) Office (5.1) Omits to do his duty (a) and (b).
- (Comments: I make notation and concern on this offence because part of the Policy of the College of Physicians and Surgeons is requiring as duty of all licensed medical doctors is to include Factual written documentation of all treatment and the reason for it. Yet, the condition of the umbilical cord and timing it was clamped are NOT reported by the medical persons and I wonder why not if the infant is to be respected as an individual and protect to all legal rights and that is even to have civil litigation for medical malpractice, and the infant is jeopardized if all facts of his/her birth are NOT recorded, even for and particularly so, for a child that died soon after birth. Exhibit of CPSBC Policy No. ______.
The Criminal Violations to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Equality Rights of the Individual and the Security of Person as alleged for no unusual or cruel treatment
- ( Comments: Depriving infant's of placenta blood when no evidence of fact to do so, and evidence destroyed when facts did not fit the decision is unusual medical treatment, particularly when the infant's blood is then conveniently taken and used in research).
The breach of duty by government officials and medical persons as to the Constitution governing a democratic society as to Rule of Law, duty to the Queen, and to God.
- (Comments: Failure of police officers, or the Crown Counsel, if they behind the scenes indicated they would not follow through with an Laying of Information for Trial, failed to understand Rule of Law did not put a professional person, even a doctor, above investigation).

The Canadian Human Rights Act: Duty of the Province to Uphold Status of Ratifications of the Principal International Human Rights Treaties.
- (Comments: I believe I represent some of the women and myself as a woman, exploitation of their bodies to produce an infant, whose blood then is deprived and used in research without the legal guardian, the mother, and possibly, the father of the child, not able to know the intent of the doctor to be able to do their duty, as parent and protector. I know that Canada has ratified the International Human Rights Treaties for their Courts and other institutions to uphold and respect the individual. Exhibit No. ____.
The World Medical Association, Inc.
- (Comments: I believe Canada supports the "Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and if the placenta blood is now being regarded as waste and the blood was willfully and intended to be trapped in the placenta rather then allowance of full-transfusion into the owner/infant, then the Declaration of Helsinki is being violated and the infant exploited for its stem cell blood to be used in research and for another, other then for its own immediate needs to have optimal health and an equal chance to be a blue ribbon baby. Exhibit No. _____.
MLA's Oath of Allegiance. Oath is sworn to the Queen and "according to law," they intend to uphold and that I allege implies to their agents and agencies in their duties to others. (Comments: I believe the Provincial government by way of "all" its MLAs as they have been informed of what is going on and failed under New Business, to discuss "discrimination going on to the "pregnant" women and discrimination of the infant whose blood was being taken without the Court's directing and approving "all" babies give up their blood at birth for the good of science. The MLAs and MPs have breached their trust to also protect the individuals equally. They failed to simply investigate by modern convenience of telephone and fax what is the trend and how has it changed, and how does it endanger women and children during childbirth.

42.1 The Equality of Women's Department and Branch failed to perceive damaged children increase the costs of education and medical health services, now over-burdened with over 155,000 children requiring labels for assistance in learning. This is information released by the Vancouver Women's and Children's Hospital. The MLAs, in particular, left this matter only in the hands of a small group the CPSBC. The Ministry of Health, in particular, failed to investigate the policies and training and practice of the licensed doctors of British Columbia, and their Oath, before they can take office, states, "I, _____, swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II (or her successor), her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God."
42.2 The Informant believes "according to law" means upholding individual rights as set by Canada and by Provincial Acts and duties to the minor/infant. That the MLAs and the Premier, knowing about this change and new trend, then failed to call the CPSBC to enquire if doctors are being adequately trained on the fetus/infant's circulation system. They were indifferent. This was true of MPs, too.
42.3 The Informant states MLAs and MPs response of what was happening to women and children was indifference, even if it happened to one person or many.
42.4 The Informant alleges the powers of the politicians were not acted on, nor by those they had allowed fiduciary trust in the care and treatment of others through Hospital and Medical Professional Acts and Colleges and Medical Standards and Policies that governed self-regulating professionals such as nurses, doctors, midwives, doulas, and educators of such matters.
42.5 The Informant alleges the indifference implied that some professionals were not being held accountable as to allegiance to according to law, which is Rule of Law. Exhibits: File of letters to MLAs, MPs, Ministries of Health (Fed/Prov).
___________________________________________________
__________________________________________

This Declaration for Laying of Information is Sworn before a person authorized to accept Declarations, in the City of Dawson Creek, British Columbia.
Dated this day _____ October 2002.

_____________________________

Informant

Donna Young

__________________________________________________________________

contact: Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home: www.lotusbirth.com

References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm

A medical web site to visit:

www.cordclamping.com

_______________________________

{PRIVATE}