bullet1 Placenta Photo links, concerns of Donna Young

    The placenta picture, below, is full of a baby's deprived blood, and suggests that someone's baby was weakened and will be anemic by early umbilical cord clamping.  

    To sign a Petition  against Active Management regarding early umbilical cord clamping, after which they harvest the baby's deprived placenta blood, visit:   www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814


    Drugs that are dangerous to the mother during labor and given to the mother while the baby is being born are also mentioned below.

    When all pulsation in the umbilical cord has ceased, the cord will be white/silver, limp and not pulsating and the child's lips and tongue will not be blue.  The placenta will be small like a flat cake, if full blood transfusion took place into the baby.  

    Older medical books directed patience of waiting at least 12-minutes before the tying and the cosmetic removal of the placenta and cord.  

     Research indicates longer for drugged babies*, and for some with cord compression difficulties.  (*Dr. Mavis Gunther, 1957, UK).

    There is apparently a taught trend for a standard of time for clamping babies routinely.  The babies are being needlessly endangered by being clamped by 30-second clamping, particularly, the weaker premature babies.  

    All babies need the volume of blood as their lungs are expanding.  You cannot set a standard time for clamping a pulsating and functioning umbilical cord.  This is if they are to survive and without lung damage.  This is including c-sections babies, who can be removed as a natural-sealed-unit.  The baby's heart, if beating, will complete the blood transfusion. The baby's own internal needs will close down the blood vessels when the baby's blood volume and pressure are satisfied, per its own needs that cannot be guessed at by any man or woman.  

     See T. Peltonen's research this website.




We must pity the poor baby whose mother was not educated not to let the medical persons clamp the pulsating cord.  It is generally a surprise clamping!  The mother not knowing the doctor and nurse intended to do that, nor, could she or her spouse stop it.  It is Bang, and it is just done.  

 

Most average to large babies will survive but they are not the blue-ribbon-babies nature intended them to be.  No baby should have to tolerate battery at birth, nor to have his / her life made harder then it is, or be impaired to the degree of oxygenated blood deprived, and for how long that happened, and what cells were damaged, will determine the child's "quality" of life.  


Smaller babies, well, they may be thought too small, if they are under 5-pounds and early cord clamping, as is presently being directed in manuals as  medical Policy, SOGC #71, December 1998 and #89 May 2000, may lead the doctors and other medical persons to believe they have a right of license to commit euthanasia here in Canada.  


This would be a step ahead of the Government's making that law or informing the public of their intent to have the doctors be the life terminators.    If they are doing this, then why is Mr. Latimer in jail for killing his 12-year old daughter?   Why would age make a difference if the child is moments old, or 12 years old when an adult determines to take a child's life, and should it be allowed the doctors to do this without informed consent to the mother her child will be judged by sex, color, race, and size to know if the child will have life, or the quality of life the child will have?


We have all hospitals in Canada, allowing for blood that would be considered waste, and a blood trapped in the placenta by a clamp is considered waste can be taken and discarded as they please, if that is burning, it is burned, if is to be sent to larger labs for research, they do not have to have disclosure or informed consent.  They have overruled the Supremacy of God's directives that the parents are the legal guardians and not the Provincial medical agents.


Lack of Education of the Mothers To Be:  Every expecting mother should make some effort to know about the infant's magical friend, the placenta.  The following links have excellent educational slides of healthy and diseased placentas:  For those not ready for graphic photos, diagrams are available at


This association recommends that the placenta not be quickly destroyed.  See my comments, below, on the Teratogenic Drugs and why I too advocate keeping the placenta until the mother and father are satisfied all is well with their baby.

  http://www.placenta.org/links/index.htm


Placenta Services: http://www.placenta.org/program/exam.htm


CPR (USA) can be contacted at the following address, phone numbers and email:

Cascadia Placenta Registry

3623 SE 76th Avenue, Suite 100

Portland, OR 97206-2443

phone: (503) 294-6045

toll-free: (877) 294-9665

fax: (503) 294-7053

e-mail: info@placenta.org  

______________________________

  • Comments by Donna:
  • Why keep the placenta?:
  • This is wise in case there are delayed complications with the child's progress.  The Placenta may give a history of any disorders an internal defects caused during the birth.   Teratogenic agents:  

  • "Drugs given during pregnancy can affect the fetus by (1) direct effect on the embryo--lethal, toxic, or teratogenic; (2) effect on the placenta (constriction of vessels), affecting gas and nutrition exchange between fetus and mother; (3) effect on the myoetrium (eg, oxytocin causing asphyxia or injuring the fetus); or (4) effect on biochemical dynamics of the mother, indirectly affecting the fetus.  "  Page 1752, Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Merck Manual, 15th Edition, 1987.

  • Labor by any drugs or combinations of drugs given the mother.  Most mothers are NOT told of risk of accepting creams, gels, applied to their membranes to rush labor, and they absorb into her blood stream, thus the child's.  


Such toxins can cause allergic side-effects, and the child may take seizures.  Toxic drugs are the abortion drugs that include any drug given to quicken, or terminate the labor for a wanted child, as well for an unwanted child:  These are the most commonly used drugs as to their variety of names:  In pill form, they are Misoprostol and Cytotec. Injected are: oxytocin, toesen, pitocin, syntotcinon.   


 All are directed and recommended by the medical experts, and most doctors and nurses and hospital staff do not always give the side effects to mother and endangering to the child.

  • The Placenta will give DNA evidence of meconium distress to the child by given the mother such drugs.   NO doctor or hospital has any right to take the placenta and drain the blood out of it, with qualify how much blood was in the placenta, and the condition of the blood as to drugs in it; and the amount per how much was given the mother, and frequency.   

  • All such information should NOT be allowed to be destroyed, and that is often the case of the placenta being put in a environmental bag, and the mother none the wiser where it is going.  Or, the amount of blood trapped in the blood that has components of blood that best have been transfused to the child.   

  • When the baby's placenta blood transfusion is stopped by quickly clamping the cord during a c-section or a vaginal birth, parents must act quickly for that was an assault on their baby.  Report it immediately by filing a complaint with the police. They may not act on, but then you can file also for Civil Constitutional violations to your child that the security of person and equal protection was not provided by the doctor and the nurse.

  • Even if the baby lives subtle to serious internal defects may have begun by the early clamping interrupting the child's perfusion of oxygenated blood and quantity of blood and volume to all cells and organs.  

  • No doctor or nurse or hospital, by any policy can disregard the rights of the child to his/her blood supply.  It is the duty implied of the parents to make the complaint of seen violations to the child, and to include the policy makers aiding and abetting that directive to endanger any one member of the Queens subjects.  See Canadian Criminal Code #180.  

  • The parents if they have not collaborated to allow their baby to be deprived of 20 to 50 percent blood volume knowing those facts, would NOT want their baby giving up its own needed blood supply to be given for another's benefit.   The duty of their child.  He she was not born to be a second class citizen, and had no duty to give up its blood, and in fact, did not.  The person who donates blood must be 17 years of age, known to be in good health (premature babies are not in good health), and must be 110 pounds.

  • The neonate has fast growth rate and it needs the hormones and the enzymes for continued cell growth, especially oxygenated blood and iron to carry oxygen to his/her brain.

  • Insufficient blood to the lungs of volume and pressure is going to weaken the baby to infections, and likely Infant Respiratory Syndrome, common of any baby immediately clamped.    

  • Most parents knowing the facts of science would NOT knowingly abuse their child.  And if their doctor misinformed them or did not know the facts but was practicing medicine with not logical intent to do adequate research and inform their clients must be protected from civil and or criminal medical assault, it is failing in their duties as a licensed person as they ought to have known.

  • The facts would be the parents did not give informed consent to allow clamping on the child's lifeline, and even though the child did not die (some babies do die from this assault/battery), it was a constitutional criminal violation to their child.   

  • The parents can file both a civil Writ and file for criminal prosecution.  The sooner this begins, the faster the false teaching in all medical books and biology books will end as to to this medical mischief and deceit to the public.   

  • A thorough history of the names of the doctors who were involved in the directing of false science must be considered by the Courts for an Inquiry, the same way a million documents were revived for the Task Blood Force on the Contamination of the Canadian Blood Supply.  

  • Canada upholds the Supremacy of God, Rule of Law, and our Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms for all, regardless of age, and the child is identified as a living person, and must have security of person and equal protection.  

  • Many of the medical policies are not enshrined in the Constitution, as they are in violations of informed choice and no organization, not even the doctors can do that to any person, and the guardian of the child is duty bound to act in the best interest of the child, of no harm or endangering.  Taking 20 to 50 percent total blood volume is endangering.  Children deprived of 20 percent of blood have gone into shock, and that medical fact was revealed in the Ontario Case-law, Chow.  

  • There must be no form of any discrimination to women, as she alone bears the child, and if she is having to have the child. The state must not then exploit her baby, by taking its blood for another, or the allowing of that.  The protection to all must be seen to be done.  

_____________________


Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-scond clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested on child birth.  Search Lotusbirth


(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect the public on medical policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies, and colleges did not live up to no form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind.  It is believed they had a duty to have a policy of equal protection and security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physcial disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.


contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home:   www.lotusbirth.com

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com