bullet1 Question   Missing Blood and no mention of timing of the clamping of the cord. Why not? Similar to Chow-case-law

    A child's volume of placenta blood with all the stem cells and nutrients of whole blood simply went missing in the Chow-case-law.  by Donna Young


    The story below, with link, reveals missing placenta blood.  What parents do not know is the child's property, placenta blood, may be drained of the blood while the doctor and nurse are alleging to be stitching the mother, after an episiotomy.  The placenta will be full of blood by hasty umbilical cord clamping, known, since 1801, to be harmful to the child, and by standards of primal birth care.  


    The draining of the placenta, if yet in the birth canal, takes 7 minutes.  The baby by immediate cord clamping can be losing up to 50 percent of total blood volume. This was so and the cause of anemia in the Chow-case-law.  An award of some $8 million dollars was granted for the child's care.  The placenta in the birth canal keeps the blood warm for faster flowing into blood collection bags.  The placenta blood may be sold to the highest bidder and the parent(s) never informed this even went on.  


    It is not wise to birth alone without a birth witness, a member of the family keeping an eye on the child, at all times.  Many times the doctors and nurse try to remove the baby away from the mother and the birth room, alleging, some kind of emergency. The birth attendant/witness must go too, and remain with the baby.  What is done to the placenta must be checked too.  It is really best to go back to the primal birth method, now called the Lotus Birth.


    A signed birth contract protects the mother and father of no unnecessary risk taking to their child and blood deprivation to their child, that will be sold.  Even the placenta and cord need not be detached from the child, as the placenta is being sold, too. The placentas are then ground up and put in centrifugal machines and tissues separated and the blood components.  


    You do not have to blindly trust the hospitals and its doctors, nor your doctor, and he/she should, by good faith, sign a birth contract as to conflict of interest in the placenta blood.  Nothing of their training or intentions should be secret or kept from the parents on their intended procedure of the care and the treatment to the child and his right to full placenta transfusion into the baby's lungs.  Most doctors have been known to lie about the importance of the nutrients in the blood to the owner/baby. They are alleging a bogus reason for interruption of the child's lifeline. They can be required to justify their policies and practice before a judge.  Make them do that.


     The procedure and intent of the doctor need not be agreed to, if known of his training to go along with immediate cord clamping. The reasons are political in increased profits in selling the placenta and the placenta blood.  The forewarning of the actual birth care needs to be discussed long before the child's birth is expected.  


    Premature babies or c-section babies are not to be removed from their placenta either.  All babies can remain on their placenta and cord.  The removal can be done by the parent, when and if done.   This is only done for cosmetic reasons and has risk of cord infections.  The Lotus birth is a wiser decision, no cord infections.  And as long as the baby is kept warm and the placenta, full blood transfusion will take place.   This is true for babies in special life-support equipment, to be left on their placenta.  The placenta close beside them, wrapped in a diaper.  


    Hospital policies cannot direct or order the placenta clamped or cut off.  It is a violation of parental rights to protect their baby. There is no harm done if the umbilical cord is not clamped or removed.  This is a primal method of care that our pioneer grandparents did. It produced strong healthy children with full immunities.  And, it is a parental decision not a policy that can be imposed on their child to clamp and/or amputate and cosmetically remove the placenta.  This is a simple procedure that the parents can do themselves, when the want, if they want.  Find out the policy intended or mostly practiced in your community by each doctor.  The early clamping must be exposed in each community. Go public and the best means to protect your baby is to birth in the privacy of your own home.  Doctors have been known to harm the mother who would not allow hasty clamping.  They have pushed the baby back inside the womb and torn up the mother so she will not have babies again.  Many medical doctors and the nurses are infringing on rights of the parents to be in control of a harmless procedure to protect their baby.  NO clamping of the umbilical cord ever, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa. The seldom ever happen and an investigation ought to be done for medical negligence.  One does not need to submit to political policies to deprive the child of his/her blood components.  


    The hospital can be taken to court if they violated the wishes of the parents and removed they clamped the cord and cut it. That is not their choice to impose an unnecessary procedure on the baby.  It is merely cosmetic removal, and the parents can control that for all babies, c-section and premature babies, too.  No political policy not approved by a Court's ruling can could risk any child to be weaker then it ought to be by blood deprivation.   The political interest is that the baby's blood is being "robbed" for research and compensation to the highest bidder. The price received can be dependent on the child's ethnic group and blood type.  Russian blood may be most desired, as well as Oriental and mixed race groups.


    All are factors in compensation to wanted stem cells posted on medical web sites, known at most hospitals.  Doctors know the blood type of the babies they are delivering. The baby may be premeditated to early clamping, by the doctor's intent to keep his/her practices and training quiet.  The C-sections babies, mostly being larger babies, are at risk of hasty clamping, too. Because premature babies have more stem cell blood then do full term, they are especially vulnerable to unnecessary early clamping.  The standard of care for all premature babies has been set at 30-seconds, and they then must be revived, as will any child early clamped.


    In the event of hasty clamping and the placenta is being drained, the mother cannot feel the placenta being drained, because it is not her blood.  It is the infant's blood that is being deprived the child.


    Failing to enforce and investigate endangering to a child under ten years of age and endangering to a person:

    Few police investigate hospital procedures and care and treatment of patients and trends and policies of the Administration as to what they are doing with the placenta and the blood trapped in them by the present trend of immediate cord clamping. Involved in concealment are the Registered-Nurses, and the Lab Technicians, who may participate in draining the placenta of the blood.  


    Lab Technicians simply follow orders as most of the medical staff in most hospitals, private or public, and do not report strange happenings of care and treatment to any patient.


    Knowing this and Coroners not properly trained, most not doctors, I question this report as to what is missing, the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord, and how the child was held during the c-section. If the baby is held high the baby's blood can run back into the placenta, causing the appearance of the cord to be premature white and to have stopped pulsating.  Too low, and the sleepy drugged baby, is not likely going to have a strong heart beat to transfuse blood up hill through the vein.  

http://www.indianpediatrics.net/april2002/april-385-388.htm

V. Parveen

S.K. Patole

J.S. Whitehall

From the Department of Neonatology, Kirwan Hospital for Women Townsville, Queensland 4817, Australia.

Correspondence to: Dr Sanjay Patole, Department of Neonatology, Kirwan Hospital for Women Townsville, Queensland 4817, Australia.

E-mail: sanjay_patole@health.qld.gov.au


Manuscript received: July 4, 2001;


Initial review completed: August 30, 2001;


Revision accepted: September 11, 2001.


Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is defined as loss of over 150 ml (5 ounces) of blood; its frequency is largely unknown(1).


It has been reported as an unexpected cause of death in 13.8% of otherwise unexplained fetal deaths(2). (See Shock )


Association of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) with severe anemia  following massive FMH is known but not well documented(3,4).


We report such an association in a term neonate needing rescue therapy with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and inhaled nitric oxide (INO).


Case Report


A 39-year-old mother (gravida-9, para-1, miscarriages-4, ectopic pregnancies-2, term-ination of pregnancy-1). delivered a female neonate weighing 3.3 kg at term following an emergency Caesarean section due to decreased fetal movements with sinusoidal pattern on the non-stress test.


A CTG done for decreased fetal movements 2 weeks prior to the delivery was normal.


Follow up CTG/biophysical profile, and ultrasonography could not be done due to patient noncompliance.


There was no history of trauma, vaginal bleeding, diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like indomethacin.


At birth, the baby was hydropic, very pale, floppy with weak peripheral pulses, and had a heart rate of 70/minute.


Apgar scores were 1 and 5 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. ( Comments from Donna Young:  This test may indicate immediate cord clamping) .


The cord pH and Hb were 7.08 and 2.5 g/dl, respectively.



She was resuscitated using intermittent positive pressure ventilation after endotracheal intubation, intra-tracheal adre-naline, and transfusion of 120 ml of group O-negative packed red cells immediately over 2 hours followed by 44 ml of cross matched red cells over 2 hours followed by a single dose of furosemide.


The baby’s post transfusion hemoglobin was 14.6 g/dl (hematocrit = 0.43) at 14 hours of age.


The direct Coombs test was negative.


Maternal Kliehauer Betke test was positive. (Estimated fetomaternal bleed: 154 ml).


The placental histopathology was normal.


Maternal Parvovirus B19 IgM was non-reactive.


Specific IgM titers for toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex I and II were negative.


The relevant laboratory investigations were as follows:


Nucleated RBC’S 542/100 WBC,

WBC count 10000/mm3,

Platelet count - 57000/mm3,

blood culture - negative,

serum creatinine-0.13 mmo1/L,

serum bilirubin - 60 mmo1/L,

total proteins - 3.2 g/L,

albumin - 1.4 g/L,

AST - 141 IU/L,

ALT 42 IU/L,

GGT - 21 IU/L,

cranial ultrasound - normal.


Sonography revealed severe ascites with no evidence of pleural/pericardial effusions.


Color Doppler study showed a structurally normal heart with evidence of PPHN (tricuspid regurgitation, right to left flow across the patent ductus arteriosus).


Additionally, the difference between pre and post ductal saturations by pulse oximetry was > 15%. HFOV (MAP = 17 cm H2O, amplitude = 59) was resorted to at 5 hours of age in view of the rising ventilatory requirements (PIP/PEEP - 35/6 cmH2O, rate - 55/minute) and unstable oxygenation (PO2 - 24-204 mmHg) in 100% oxygen along with surfactant therapy, sedation, muscle paralysis, inotrope therapy.


INO was subsequently started at 6 hours of age (oxygenation index - 62) at 20 ppm and later increased to 30 ppm.


Following a sustained improvement in oxygenation commencing at 7 hours of age, the inspired oxygen con-centration was reduced to 40% by 60 hours of age and the mean airway pressure was weaned to 8 cm H2O by 75 hours of age.


Cardiovascular stability allowed inotropes (dopamine, dobutamine) to be weaned off by day 3.


INO was subsequently weaned off by day 4 and the neonate was extubated to room air on day 6.


The urine output had increased to 8-9 ml/kg/hour by day 5 with significant resolution of the generalized edema by day 7.


Further hospital stay was uneventful and the neonate was neurologically normal at discharge on day 12.


Discussion


FMH of over 30 ml of fetal blood occurs in normal pregnancies with a frequency of about 1 in 300(1).


Defined as the loss of more than 150 ml (or approximately 50% of the fetal blood volume), massive FMH is rarely suspected before fetal death(5,6).


PPHN has been reported as a consequence of massive FMH (3,4).


Frickers et al. reported massive FMH leading to marked anemia (Hb - 4.9 g/dl) and rapidly progressive heart failure in a neonate who developed symptoms of ‘persistent fetal circulation’ (PFC) despite blood transfusion and digoxin therapy but survived(3).


Moya et al reported 4 cases of massive FMH presenting with severe anemia (hematocrit - 16-26%) and signs of circulatory failure(4).


One of these neonates with pallor (Hb - 5.5 g/dl), weak peripheral pulses, systemic hypotension, soft systolic murmur and hepatomegaly deteriorated rapidly, developing PPHN documented on echocardiography.


Though the mother had gestational diabetes, echocardiography of this neonate did not reveal poor cardiac contract-ility or cardiomyopathy that is usually seen in infants of diabetic mothers.


Red cell trans-fusion and mechanical ventilation with 100% oxygen were required to stabilize the neonate. At discharge the neonate was neurologically normal.


The factors associated with the patho-genesis of PPHN include acute as well as chronic hypoxia(7,8).


It is well documented that acute hypoxia causes smooth muscle contraction in pulmonary arteries through a direct effect on intracellular calcium levels(8).


The mechanisms of pulmonary endothelial adaptation to sustained hypoxia include reduction in nitric oxide production, possibly through reduced activity of formative enzyme nitric oxide synthase that may enhance the development of secondary pulmonary hyper-tension(8).


Cardiac output and hemoglobin are the key elements in determining systemic oxygen transport(9).


Additionally hypovole-mic, anemic hypoxia (e.g., hemorrhagic shock) is less well tolerated compared to hypoxic hypoxia(9).


Given this evidence, prompt correction of anemia/hypovolemia and aggressive prevention (e.g., management of hypoglycemia, hypothermia) and management of PPHN is warranted in cases of FMH(7,9,10).


Contributors: VP performed the literature search and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. SKP and JSW helped in final drafting of the manuscript. SKP will act as the guarantor for the manuscript.


Funding: None.


Competing interests: None stated.


Key Messages

 

• Association of persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn (PPHN) with severe anemia following massive fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is known but not well documented.


• As hypovolemic, anemic hypoxia (e.g., hemorrhagic shock) is less well tolerated compared to hypoxic hypoxia, prompt correction of anemia, hypovolemia to maintain systemic oxygen transport and aggressive prevention of PPHN is warranted in cases of FMH.

  

 References  


1. Giacoia GP. Severe fetomaternal hemorrhage: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1997; 52: 372-380.


2. Laube DW, Schauberger CW. Fetomaternal bleeding as a cause for "unexplained" fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 649-651.


3. Fricker HS, Zumofen W, Hofmann E. Severe neonatal anemia associated with feto- maternal transfusion and persistent fetal circulation. Helv Pediatr Acta 1983; 38: 179-183.


4. Moya FR, Perez A, Recece EA. Severe fetomaternal hemorrhage. A report of four cases. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 243-246.


5. Cardwell MS. Fetomaternal hemorrhage: When to suspect, how to manage. Postgrad Med 1987; 82: 127-130.


6. Elliot JP. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage treated by fetal intravascular trnasfusion. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 520-523.


7. Yu VY. Persistent pulmonary hypertension in the newborn. Early Hum Dev 1993; 33: 163-175.


8. Higenbottam T, Cremona G. Acute and chronic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 1993; 6: 1207-1212.


9. Anderson C. Critical Hemoglobin thresholds in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal and Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: F146-F148.


10. Kinsella JP, Abman SH. Inhaled nitric oxide and high frequency oscillatory ventilation in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157(Suppl): S-28-S-30.

 ___________


Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in child birth.  Search Lotusbirth


(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal protection to babies from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect the public on medical policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies, and colleges did not live up to no form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind.  It is believed medical persons had a duty to have a policy of equal protection and security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.

contact: dyoung@pris.ca

Home Page:   www.lotusbirth.com


A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com

A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:

www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814