Distress, Disorder, Disease & even Death: The 4-D's involved in harmful medical practices to
the pregnant woman and child.
DDDD's: Disorder, Distress, Disease and Even Death -- the 4-D's, by Donna Young
The drugging of a pregnant woman, even after full development of the child, particularly, during labor, I believe is the first beginnings of what I have called the DDDDs: disorders, distress, disease, and even the death of child. You may want to look at the various blood disorders at this web site. This has been stated in some of my original writings. If you share this information please give credit to www.lotusbirth.com
I state that attributing to the DDDD's are the
original drugs
given to the mother during labor because all drugs will cross the
placenta as they are assimilated into the mother's blood stream. There the placenta takes the
nutrients including the drugs in the
mother's system and nourishes the fetus, or harms the embryo, fetus, and born neonate/newborn citizen. See the current issue of
Autistic children
gaining financial support at $65,000 per year, per child, becoming the duty of the government
to provide for their
care. I would think it wise for the best treatment of sickness is prevention, and that
they will allow for a Commission of Inquiry on
Maternity Matters, across Canada, as to these factors:
(1) Position of the child's birth, flat on the back and semi-sitting are
most harmful to mother and child.
(2) Drugging the mother to slow the labor down, with morphines; then speeding the labor up with oxytocins/pitocins harm both mother and child.
(3) Early cord clamping then makes the child deficient in nutrients, up to 60 percent total blood volume can be deprived a child clamped before all pulsation ceased. The cord must be white/silver, limp and not pulsating and the child's lips and tongue must not be blue. And it is best not to touch the lifeline/hopeline of the child at all, the purpose of this website.
(4) Early vaccinations preserved with toxins like mercury, all contribute to the child's demise and unstable health conditions, many showing up later when the child is older. The placenta blood deprived babies are iron deficient, anemic and nutrient deprived.
All drugs are either fat or water soluble, and that determines
how well a tiny infant can dispel the toxins. The fetus cannot
dispel toxins like the adult body can, That is logical. DNA tests, can determine these trace elements
in the child's urine and
amniotic cells and blood samples taken for blood typing, and very little blood needs to be taken for
just blood typing.
Only a spot of blood is needed to confirm iron content or anemia of a born child,
deprived of 20 to 50 percent total volume of
blood deprived a neonate at birth by clamping off a pulsating umbilical cord. Children who were off
their umbilical cords quickly at
birth ought to have regular pricks of their fingers to determine anemia. They may be missing the
enzymes and hormones from the
deprived blood and are not assimilated the iron nutrients in their foods, many alleged needing Vitamin
B12 to assimilate iron and
Vitamin C, too.
Drugs Damage Brain Cells:
The drugs containing fat soluble preservatives can lodge in the brain cells and can pit the soft tissues. This is according to the brain lesion evident in the studies of Dr. Windle, revealed in the Educator's book, Joseph Chilton Pearce, Magical Child , pages 48-50, Chapter, Time Bomb. www.123-baby-birth.com
These drugs as they linger in the brain cells, may stop the future development
of new brain cells. New brain cells, from
research I read long ago, stated new brain cells continue to develop until the child is about two years
old. Then after that time, the
brain cells just grow bigger. It is logical that a child with destroyed existing cells is
going to be developmentally impaired and
compromised. This will be to the degree he/she was impaired by a variety of drugs given the trusting
and uneducated mother,
during labor, and possible injected into the child after his/her birth, followed by blood deprivation
of 20 to 50 percent total blood
volume loss by early clamping of the pulsating umbilical cord.
Then the giving of further antibiotics for cord infections, received at
the hospital for the recycled clamp or a clamp not
sufficiently sterilized, causes yeast infections inside the mother and the baby. Then the baby
is further subjected to early
vaccinations, when the child is still struggling from birth trauma.
Vaccinations or injections are being given infants at birth, like Vitamin K,
what preservatives are in it? Heb B vaccinations are
given at birth. Other vaccinations are imposed on the child as young as three months of age. These
are given whether or not the
child was a premature baby and still struggling and trying to catch up of their prematurity. All these
are contributing factors of the
child being pushed over the edge. Then you have full blown Autism.
Vaccinations are alleged only a single factor if the mother can allege a no-drugged
birth and no immediate cord clamping as
the single cause. Does that mean there is no claim for the drug company for questionable vaccinations. NO. But that in some
individual cases, there may be the need to add contributors named as defendants. This makes the
claim for compensation to the
child somewhat more complicated, but so what.
Damage children have a legal right, according to law, to compensation. Once
born they have a legal right to know what
evidence of DNA was available or ought to have been made to know the extent of internal and latent iatrogenic
caused disorders
that would not likely be manifested until the child is of school age.
Damaged children is the victimized child of many failings of our society and
duty to the child. The implied duty is that only the
safest and best practice possible and care is provided for the child. This is as to our knowledge
and that must be seen to be
passed on for the child's treatment and care.
I say that the medical professionals and associations and their Professional
Act are failing to inform the public at large of
known risks, adequately, to the parent(s) to be.
I say that the Steering Committees making policies, recommending drugs and procedures,
the hospitals and their own
pharmacies, where they did not have informed consent of the endangering of the products, meaning adequate
information
provided to the medical consumer, or for choices offered for a safer alternative to drugs during labor,
like warm water births and
following nature to determine the birth and time of birth for the child without invasive intervention,
are not accepting their duties
and responsibilities in compensating these victimized children. This is financially, pain and
suffering and the loss of expectations
of the child to have been able to develop to natural and fullest potentials, if he/she were given the
known and proper and safe and
least endangering care. Every child is original designed by nature to be a blue-ribbon-baby.
Legal rights to damaged or impaired or compromised children, even just Constitutional
violated for security of person and
equal protection by immediate cord clamping (blood deprivation of even one drop of blood) are to be
provided for. I say this
because I have seen the Big Corporations are receiving financial damages from governments, for the slightest
hint they were
endangering the public at large. These cases, such as additives in gas, were settled out of court,
for loss of expectations of
profits.
This was just the "threat" there product would not be accepted. Not
that they were stopped in the additives to gas crossing the
borders. Therefore, at a member of the public, I believe that if Big Corporations can receive
millions in compensation for just a
threat to loss of expectations of profits, then how much more so to compensate the victimized
babies, innocent of what society
has been imposing on them, for loss of expectations of achievements by being impaired compromised or
endangered to be so
by present policies imposed on them stopping oxygenated blood into their bodies, by their own organs.
If their blood and oxygen was not knowingly impaired, hasty clamping is not
a needed medical procedure. If hasty clamping
stopping the flow of blood is a medical procedure because of drugging the mother, the mother was not
so informed and that is a
Constitutional violation of security of person to mother and child, and failure to equal protect. I
say that is discrimination to the
uniqueness of women, only to bear babies, and this is a form of discrimination when truthful and factual
information is not
provided. It also is costly to the society in increased education costs, medical care, and financial
taxation in pending law suits
involving the government as the principal of the Professional Act written, implying duty of trust and
care to protect the public, by
their agents, the government licensed educators and medical persons providing care to society.
I say, there is unfairness at present. What society is saying to these
1 in 16 victimized children as to defects, is that when they
cannot achieve to our expectations, then society states to the child, it is all their own fault. That
is not true when you examine what
is withheld to the public at large and false information in the education textbooks, prenatal classes,
and training of doctors to be
competent and trustworthy in all that they do, or fail to inform.
I believe these victimized children are under so much distress at the beginning
of their life, they cannot without the
understanding of what is happening in their brain, they escape to drugs. Drug addiction to the
impaired child is likely more so
then a normal child. Unless the impaired child is informed drugs will further damage the good
cells they have, so the child has
loss of enjoyment of even recreational or social drinking. Who does not like a class of wine now
and then, but to a impaired child
that can be dangerous to them and even to society.
Learning for any person that has killed brain cells and an impaired nervous
system is that more difficult when life alone is
difficult.
What is the problem is our society does not know how to teach these impaired
and compromised children. After the war
years, about 1948, the government brought in strict discipline and rote learning. Did they know
the impaired children who
donated blood, unknowingly to the war cause, by immediate cord clamping, would be compromised that they
promoted the Dick
and Jane Rote method of learning? Each child repeating a few words over and over again, in a serious
of books, and few given
the phonetic system, whether or not these children were impaired or not, depending on the training and
ethics of the doctor who
controlled the fate of the child by the timing of the clamping of the child's lifeline.
Then the phonetic system changing after the war, when babies not clamped entered
school, uncompromised , if the doctors
changed their methods to delayed clamping, again. So we would have about 1954 the return to the
phonetic system. What was
happening in the hospitals was still drugs, bringing in the testing of a variety of drugs by the Apgar
scores, which drugs were
more harmful to babies, requiring their continued observation. The Apgar scores starting in the
States about 1948 and in British
Columbia, Canada, about 1952.
DUTY TO THE CHILD:
The child is a victimized person all through life. But society states it is all their own fault, or the fault of the trusting parent in the medical associations and societies to do no harm. We blamed the school educators for not knowing how to teach the impaired children. But they were part of the plan, if the educator Joseph Chilton Pearce could investigate drugs and immediate cord clamping, was that fact not also evident to the governments of the day, to the present, or ought to have been by their own appointed representatives of the public?
Duty of Pharmacies to Warn and Educate the facts of Ingredients of their
products:
Those abandoning their duties to society and to the pregnant women, are also the pharmacies and the drug companies who the public, at large, believed in them, not to make products with concealed preservatives and trace elements that can be knowingly be harmful to a child's developing brain. The brain cells and nervous system impaired by such questionable ingredients, have been named to be oxytocins, the most commonly used drugs used in the professional services to a pregnant women during the stages of labor, and after the child's birth of his/her shoulders.
Thus, the drugs are quickly into the placenta and the child's blood stream unless
the doctor stops the oxygenated blood flowing
by hasty clamping after oxytocin (Pitocin, Syntocinon, Toesen) injections of the birthing mother. Those
facts must be revealed in
any development delays of any child struggling to learn. Impaired, compromised as much as any
adult who has a stroke trying to
re-learn past information. Well, the impaired and compromised child struggles to learn new information,
that which is not daily
speech or personal experience that may or may not go into long term member cells, which are impaired. Thus, children impaired
by drugs, like marijuana users, have short term memory problems.
That is true of stroke victims. Is this fair to the child that is so afflicted? Is it fair to the mother and the father who planned a
blue-ribbon-baby as to having healthy bodies before and after conception, then they were deceived by
the information in biology
books and the services during birth of their baby. They did not know the rules had changed that
you cannot trust your family
doctor to be adequately trained, or the local hospital to inform you of the drugs they intend to offer
the birthing mother and those
dangers to herself and the child.
EQUITY AND FAIRNESS:
Is this fair to conceal such important information for informed choices. What is in the drugs? How long will it impair a fetus, neonate?
What are the evidence of DNA testings if the mother accepted drugs during labor,
or was in a drugged state when she
entered labor?
All these are facts that are important to be recorded on the child's medical records for the child to have security of person, and equal protection, according to law. The duty is to have a Court, civil or criminal, judge any Constitutional violation to the newborn citizen, once born.
The evidence of his/her care is in the infant's blood cells, urine, and placenta...all his legal organs. The has child's right to know of the care of birth, conception to birth, being the right of the child to know.
____________________________
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for
: AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate
Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's
Declaration ; pH
receptors ; References ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject
you may be interested in
child birth.
Search Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed medical persons had a
duty to have a policy of equal
protection and security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race,
color, social or marital status of
the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical
researchers, for stem cell
matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact: dyoung@pris.ca
Home Page: www.lotusbirth.com
A medical web site to visit:
A Petition to Protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too:
www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
