bullet1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights & Rule of Law

Human Rights for all regardless of age, sex, color, race, or mental or physical disadvantage:  . . . Thoughts of Donna Young


Fiftieth Anniversary  of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, are these ideals being upheld in democratic countries, such as the United States and Canada?   For them to be upheld, we need a Universal Commissioned Inquiry on the Maternity Care and Delivery Process.  

  •     This is for the universal protection of the newborn neonate and the rights of the mother during child birth to be able to protect her baby from medical assault and battery.  Any imposed medical policy by a group or a hospital policy without informed consent and the truth of safer options, is assault and battery, in the opinion, of mothers so violated by what was imposed on them, in a pregnant condition.
  •     It is apparent babies are being exploited, universally.  This is happening at birth.  Motives are to universally take away the child's placenta blood, for only cosmetic reasons, and then use it in science and research and without informed consent.
  •     For the placenta blood to be gained, the child must be violated by 30-second or immediate cord clamping.
  •     The United States now ranks below 27 other countries in the safe of child birth.  It has one of the highest rates of infant deaths.  I believe it relates to interest in the fetal blood and transplant tissues.  The Food and Drug authorities have not protected the use of infant's placenta and blood from it in human drugs, cosmetic, and in stem cell development from the tissues of the developing embryo and in aborted fetus, or in the still born child, or from the placenta of the living child.


Most parents are not prepared to protect their babies from the endangering of medical procedures and policies that have eroded their natural role of the legal and protective guardian over their child.  The State is not obviously monitoring the self-regulation of the doctors, whom they contracted that services out to the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons and the Colleges of Midwives, and Societies and Associations contracting to publish Biology Books and Emergency Manuals and Training.


Often society understands the animals need of protection, but neglect their duty to the human child.  Failing to investigate the medical services in the hospital, or provided by any medical persons, from the doula to the surgeon, on any child's birth and failing to provide a proper Coroner's Inquiry on any infant's death, even attended by a medical person, and even in a hospital, has allowed for the concealed birth injuries to babies, and some their deaths.  This may have gone on for millions of babies for the past three and four generations.  

    • It seems the policy of a medical goal was only the mother lived and the child, not that the mother had left the hospital healthy and with a blue ribbon baby.  
    • But is that an excuse for violations of keeping the child from the being the best it might have been? Or, that the mother had a positive and natural birth experience, controlling labor discomfort by freedom of movement and the right of a warm water birth, keeping the baby warm, wrapped in a warm towel, and no clamping on the umbilical cord, at all.  And this right for a c-section baby or premature baby, too.
    • Hospital are not actually set up for natural birth experiences.  They have adopted an "Active Management Policy".  The do not know how to actually have a natural birth, and rely mostly on interventions of drugs and tools.  

Most interventions are at the risk of causing damage to the child. Interventions at birth often have a child being born prematurely and in a harmful birth position, and damaged by the drugs and the tools used, forceps and vacuums.  (See the Chow-case-law and the Ing-case-law, Sommers and Roth, Ontario Canada, available on the Internet).


Below are those  Rights that were Alleged by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including and implied for babies?:


1948 - 1998

http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html


  Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages.


Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."


PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,


Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,


Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, . . .


Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for :  AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's Declaration ; pH receptors ; Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested on child birth. Search Lotusbirth


(Reference from Protect Babies http://www.123-baby-birth.com)   Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect the public on medical policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies, and colleges did not live up to no form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind.  It is believed they had a duty to have a policy of equal protection and security of person, regardless of:  age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social or marital status of the pregnant lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers, for stem cell matching, and use of white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.


contact:   Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother

Home Page:   www.lotusbirth.com

A medical web site to visit:  

  www.cordclamping.com