Lotus Birth, Bowen Island, BC, Canada Gloria Lemay, Birth Witness
A waterbirth followed by Lotus Birth = a Blue-Ribbon-Baby as nature intended us all to be, comments and research of Donna Young.
The Link is below to the true story, a positive encouragement from conception to birth. We all can have this in the future, our dream babies.
This is as nature intends we all be blue-ribbon-babies. To be so is a
design by nature for all placenta birthing mammals. For
man to cause unnecessary interventions is an issue for the courts to determine battery, endangering,
bodily harm in the internal
organs and to review the excuses and justification whenever oxygenated blood was stopped transfusing
into the owner/infant's
body.
Steady pressure and volume was needed for the baby not to be risked to internal
injury. Volume and pressure is stopped by
hasty clamping. The heart shrinks, the brain gives up its blood, and so to other organs, if the
lungs are to function, properly. Then
the baby is low volume pressured, thereafter, and is weak and anemic, but demonstrates jaundiced because,
the low blood
volume cannot deal with the iron reserves caused by premature death of the red cells. It will
take baby at least two weeks to
cause the jaundice to go away, and some 6 weeks to 6 months for full recovery of the red blood cells,
unless the baby was so
weak he or she was topped up by a blood transfusion or blood expanders.
That is assault and battery in my definition of endangering. Most law
firms stayed away from helping deal with the government
officials involved in this cover-up of not controlling the Colleges of Midwives and Colleges of Physicians
and Surgeons to be
competently and ethically trained on this issue, their boards stacked with government representatives
to protect the babies, as
having rights of equal protection and security of person. That is for all babies, and multiple
birth babies, too, whether born by c-section, or vaginal birth, and whether premature or full term babies.
Please visit one of the positive gentlest births in British Columbia, perhaps,
the only one in Canada, so far. Correction. As
women get informed and are not afraid to look at the placenta and leave it alone, more babies in British
Columbia, and the place
of my birth, Victoria, are going Lotus.
This story of a Lotus birth is at one of my favorite islands: Bowen
Island British Columbia, Canada.
Birth Witness: Gloria LeMay. Mother's Story:
http://www.birthlove.com/free/yashua.html
This true story begins from the couple planning a healthy conception by the proper nutritional care of both the man's and woman's body. They plan the baby's birth and seek an educated person willing to have a hand's-off care to the mother and child. A birth-witness may be a licensed or unlicensed person, there because of the mother's request. This is someone, experienced, like a mother, who could help, if and as necessary. The mother choose a warm water birth and the safe management of her baby that had no clamping of the umbilical cord, or cutting it, ever, after the child's birth.
All women must be cautioned that some medical persons who know about no clamping
or cutting of the umbilical cord, may try
to convenience the mother they must take samples of the placenta blood. They then insert a needle
to draw out blood from the
placenta, while the umbilical cord is still pulsating. This must not be done, as still, risk of
contamination of the child's blood
system is a possibility. Lotus Birth means leaving the placenta blood alone, no insertion of needles
for blood tissues of the
child's. Nothing of this nature needs to be imposed on the child, certainly, not without informed
consent of the endangering
chances to the child, owner of the placenta and the blood within it it, and none other.
This no clamping or cutting of the umbilical cord is the pioneer method prior
to 1923. It is a method that has never left our
universe, except in institutional births. No clamping and no cutting of the umbilical cord is
performed by many cultures for home
and hospital births. No clamping or cutting of the cord is now called the Lotus Birth and it is
a revival of common sense of the
benefits for the newborn citizen. The facts of science are that there will be no cord or blood
infections when a child's umbilical
cord is not clamped, tied, or cut, ever. Some babies leave the hospital imposed clamping and cutting
with cord infections, and
hernias and infants that will have anemia, likely, the rest of their lives. The virus infection
now a threat of getting into infants who
have had insertion of needles into their skin and clamping of the umbilical cord and its cutting is
called "Super bug." That
infection demands new types of drugs, if it can be controlled, at all.
This tradition, habit, trend of hasty umbilical cord clamping, is just cosmetic
procedures to clamp and cut. The clamping is
generally followed after a woman accepts any kind of drug during her labor stages. The drugs can
be with or without the mother's
informed consent. They are given in pill and powder food, in foods or drink; injected, or in drip
form. The drugging is not
necessary at all for a mother to have a natural birth. But hospitals call this management
and control over the mother and child,
"Active Management."
Hospitals use "Active Management" to control the length of the labor
of a mother, offering her, her baby within 12 hours of
entering their premises. They are not offering the mother to go home with a "blue-ribbon-baby." Only, that she goes home with a
"living" baby. The baby, if it lives past two-years, is going to have a lot of problems
learning and keeping pace with our society.
There are over 155,000 children in British Columbia, Canada, alone, that must have a medically approved
health condition, if
they are to advance through the education system, for the means to have a job or career.
At one time, nurses manipulated a woman's birth to a child, by tying her legs
together, waiting for the doctor to arrive. Drugs
are the means to delay labor, such as morphines, Demerols, etc. The Drugs they use to terminate
the pregnancy to their busy
time schedule are oxytocin/pitocin ; misoprostol, cytotec, and a variety of forms of gels and creams,
to stripping the mother's
membranes, to the breaking of the mother's water, to cutting of her body to bring forth a likely internally
damaged child, or one
that will be physically observed, damaged.
Those that have learned to interfere with the pulsating umbilical cord are the
ambulance attendants trained by the Justice
Institute of British Columbia, who also approve and teach clamping the pulsating cord in all Emergency
Manuals and at all
prenatal class instructors, and to all Registered Nurses training prenatal classes, and involving the
BC Reproduction Care
Program, which simply states how to deal with a clamped and cut cord, not the policies why to do this
to the child.
All these controlled but licensed instructors forget or cannot by policy of
the government by their license, inform the woman that
no clamping or cutting of the cord is not necessary, but only cosmetic and one that is extremely dangerous
to introducing disease
into the child's blood stream.
Hospitals use "Active Management" rather than natural birth of no
unnecessary interventions, simply as a means to hurry the
third stage of labor. Waterbirths are simply inconvenient but are approved by the Society of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists of
Canada (SOGC) as the only good directive in Policy #71, December 1998. They direct the mother
be informed the baby is NOT
a fish, and to bring the child up immediately from the water after birth, and the water not be too hot
or too cold.
While all modern hospitals have warm running water in British Columbia, Canada,
I have found none that have provided as to
this guidance, waterbirths or warm showers for the mother to birth her baby, and catch her own baby. Why not?
It is my opinion that when a doctor and his/her staff or the hospital staff
clamp a pulsating umbilical cord, they are in breach of
duty of trust owed to the child, owner of the blood. The blood is likely, intentionally, trapped
in the placenta. The placenta blood,
is to be then drained by their pathology labs, as the placenta blood, called cord blood, is wanted by
drug companies. The
average collection received by stem cell blood banks, per child is 4 to 6 ounces, about 100 to 180 ccs. The draining of this
healthy blood, even if drugged, is drained from the placenta, if still warm in the mother's birth canal,
takes about 7-minutes.
Draining from a cold expelled placenta takes 20-minutes, and is less efficient to obtain the most blood
from the placenta.
The Constitutional rights of the baby are that he/she have all the placenta
blood transfused into his lungs to be a healthy
contented baby. This lotus birth was a perfect ending to a well-planned birth. Such births
should be planned for all babies, as
much as it depends on the father and the mother and the wise selection of a knowledgeable birth attendant. Most birth
attendants want to control the birth of the child and they want to catch the child and control the timing
of the clamping of a still
pulsating umbilical cord.
Most of these licensed birth attendants across Canada, while they may know,
no clamping or cutting of the cord is necessary,
fail to tell that to their clients. They don't have to offer all information for informed choices
to the mother, or the value of the
placenta blood to cord blood banks, who may take the other components of the blood, other then stem
cells, and send it to the
open market to drug companies.
The cord stem cell blood banks, get the whole blood and extract the enzymes,
hormones, white platelets, plasma, red cells, but
they charge the parents for the extraction and the saving of just the immature mother cells. These
cells only are contracted for
indefinite storage. The parents are none the wiser that the components of the blood, containing
the DNA of their child's and their
families origins history, are sent to others, or the highest bidder of that cell and tissue DNA and
blood type.
NOTE: Gloria LeMay would well qualify to have a BC Midwife License,
if she so wanted. If she had chosen to be licensed by
the BC Midwives, she would not have spent time in jail for contempt of court. But her grounds
were on principle that women must
be free to choose a birth attendant they have trust and faith in. This means not to impose, contrary
to the mother's informed
consent, or rejection of a practice, and to use best practice possible, and least endangering of interventions
to the child.
Most hospitals on the lower mainland and as far as I known on the Island, have
running water and bath tubs and showers but
are NOT prepared to allow a woman to birth her baby in warm water. This mother, on Bowen Island,
elected to birth in her home,
with a wise birth witness, to have her rights for a blue ribbon baby.
Blue-ribbon babies are not generally achieved in hospital births, only living
babies. There is a big difference in raising a living
baby and a blue-ribbon-baby. The doctors and nurses for most hospital births use Active management
techniques. This violates
natural timing of a child's birth, trying to regulated the child's birth by termination of the pregnancy
by the hospital using abortion
drugs on 9-month full term babies. Abortion drugs used during labor are oxytocins that is alleged
by the World Health
Organization to require immediate umbilical cord clamping. Why? What is the evidence of harm withheld
from the public?
Gloria LeMay is not likely to be part of the group that may require her to be
silent on harmful practices upheld by Policies such
as Policy #89 May 2000, by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC). Or, to close
a blind eye to their
Policy #71, December 1998 acknowledge babies made weaker by 6 weeks to 6 months before side-effects
of hasty clamping
were not as noticeable. What would be not as noticeable after 6 weeks to 6 months of 20 to 50
percent blood deprivation, but
none other then anemia. Anemia is mostly caused by blood loss or deprivation, such as hasty clamping
taking 4 ounces to 6
ounces from every baby born in Canada, as intended by Policies #89 and #71.
Policy #89 directed all babies have immediate cord clamping. The groups
that inspired the Courts to put Gloria LeMay in
prison, such as the College of Midwives of BC, did not dissent on ethical and scientific grounds of
SOGC's policy. Nor, did the
College of Physicians and Surgeons, who have a duty to protect all persons according to law, which are
the criminal codes to do
nothing endangering to any person, that would not be upheld as a benefit to them, in a court of law. (Section #45, Criminal Code).
When organizations of medical persons do not dissent, I hardly think it fair
to require ethical and well-trained medical person,
like Gloria LeMay,to be part of their associations by a license, and the undertaking to be secret and
silent to the public of what I
consider criminal medical malpractice policies.
After the Colleges and the Government were written in letters of "warning"
of the harmful practices during c-sections and
vaginal births, they willfully continued on in false policies and failed to warn the public they were
a new trend, designed to take the
placenta blood to be used in research, with or without the parents consent. The Tri-Council of
Canada, organized with other
associations had the Hospitals Boards approve, per community, the taking of organs and blood to be used
as they saw fit and to
take them and the DNA without knowledge or consent of the persons trusting no such breach of fiduciary
trust would be done to
them, or organs sent to others without their consent, or right to say no.
Consequently, during that time of correspondence, a child has died in Dawson
Creek, BC, as of October 8, 2000. We have no
babies to spare. NOT to be exploited for organs or their blood drained and used as tissue for
another. This baby, that died, did
not have a proper investigation by the Coroner's to the best of my knowledge.
How many other children were killed during birth by drugging of the mother,
followed by immediate cord clamping? We must
uphold Rule of Law, Supremacy of God, and the fact we have Criminal Codes to be upheld by all
persons, including medical
person, whose policies must first uphold the Charter and Constitution.
What does Rule of Law mean? Well, I think it should mean
the authors of false biology books and their publishers, and the
authors and publishers of false medical Policies should be investigated for public mischief and aiding
and abetting harm to
others, that they will not be responsible for those persons who cannot figure out some medical policies
are hoaxes, NOT intended
to be followed out by reasonably thinking and logical persons.
How did false medical policies keep processing. The only thing I
can find is that the internal debates were inside a closed
association and society and not discussed openly to the public as to reasons of trends not based in
facts of science, and that
closed associations kept wrongful policies in internal discussions, not public disclosures of harm caused
to babies born in
hospitals where nurses did not report their inner conscience some babies were needing oxygen and rival
of blood expanders,
and some babies who were not hastily clamped did not. But not always the same nurses were
seeing all the methods and
trends of the doctors, and they are trained not to question the practices of doctors, when they are
"mere" nurses.
The nurses not trained in the facts of the fetus circulation and the purpose of the placenta, and did not know there were different lengths of time, per size of the child, nor complications of drugs and compressed cords that all cords and their pulsation cannot be standardized, like 30-second clamping for all babies, premature, c-section, vaginal birth, and full term.
The baby, itself, determines when full volume and pressure are optimized. That
cannot be done by the person yielding a tool,
that will clamp off oxygenated blood to the owner/infant of the blood.
They then followed blindly instructions to put the placenta, when born and all
its contents of blood yet in it, and allowed it to go
uninvestigated what happened to the blood trapped in a early clamped placenta.
The doctor may have been willfully blind, too, as to details and both were negligent
that they failed to write the details of the
treatment to the cord, the timing of the cord, the condition of the cord when clamped on the child's
own medical charts. How
come? Why not?
While the medical person(s) may say, as a defense, it was NOT important to the
medical person, how much blood was
trapped in the placenta (MDConsult, Gabbes, used as a defense by the CPSBC or alleged may be used as
defense not to
investigate hasty clamping done on any child), it was important as to civil and Constitutional rights
of the child.
The destroying of evidence without recording on the child's medical charts treatment,
during and after the child's birth,
specifically the attention to the umbilical cord, may well be considered obstruction of justice by that
discarding without facts
written down. This is for the person's right for any cause for criminal prosecution of medical
malpractice, to have been denied
that information, to his/her specific birth details.
If a procedure was done by hasty clamping for a pH test, where is the evidence of facts of the test and the facts it could "only" be done if the cord was immediately clamped and before the child was breathing on his/her own, well, and the cord not pulsating? And, if the tests was not done, and the child made vulnerable to be a weaker child, and likely anemic deprived of nutrients and stem cells of the blood, why was the child endangered by immediate umbilical cord clamping?
__________________________________________________________
Note: PETITION www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814
Please ask this site to have a Medical Alert Petition Site: petitions@earth.case2.com
We need support, Internationally, to help Canada correct or investigate present training of all medical persons who will or intend to be at a mother's birth.
We need support for informed choices, of both parents, that our babies are not being harvested by methods of Active Management.
Search this www.lotusbirth.com web site for
: AAP policy, SOGC policy, ACOG policy; Placenta; Fetus to Neonate
Circulation; 30-second clamping; World Health Organization and Dupont ; Circumcision ; Dr. Sarah Buckley's
Declaration ;
Canadian Criminal Codes and when a baby is a person; and any other subject you may be interested in
child birth.
Search
Lotusbirth
(Reference from Protect Babies
http://www.123-baby-birth.com)
Search at Google this web site for the " No Policies " on equal
protection to babies at from the various government officials who appointed representatives to protect
the public on medical
policies and practices; also the "No policies" of the various medical associations, societies,
and colleges did not live up to no
form of discrimination to women or the child of any kind. It is believed they had a duty to have
a policy of equal protection and
security of person, regardless of: age, mental or physical disadvantages ; race, color, social
or marital status of the pregnant
lady ; or belief or faith of the family, or genetic type of blood sought for by medical researchers,
for stem cell matching, and use of
white cells, mature red cells, platelets, enzymes, hormones, and plasma.
contact:
Donna Young, Mother and Grandmother
Home: www.lotusbirth.com
References of research: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm
A medical web site to visit:
