Heart Diagram: Immediate Clamping Causes Holes in the Heart.

    The Heart Diagram, below,  is followed with comments as to a medically caused conditions.

    This Url for referral conveniences is:  www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-100.htm

     Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping Causes Holes in the Heart and is one of the major factors of the cause of "autism, attention deficit disorder, mental retardation, respiratory distress syndrome" and many latent, internal disorders, too, and according to Dr. George M. Morley, MB, ChB. . (See Latent Disorders  in red below.   (This article has been Revised June 26, 2004). by Donna Young, Natural Birth Education.  The author is a Mother and Grandmother.  This is a diagram on the adult circulation system. For a diagram on the Fetal Circulation see:   www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-435.htm   See Link to eroding protection of civil rights by organization of medical groups  denying medical services to lawyers and firms who deal with medical malpractice.

Other educational Links on the Heart follow the comments:

    Many of the one in four persons now having heart problems, and 1 in 16 persons having defects, as reported by biology textbooks (Inquiry Into Life), Sylvia Madder, may have been caused those problems by "preventable" birth trauma.  I personally spoke to a thirty year old female,  who thought she had a heart attack but found out that her symptoms were actually caused by an undetected hole in the heart. She had thought she had  been healthy all of her life. The hole in the heart, actually, had been there since birth. Youths dying of brain tumors at age 20, are hearing medical persons saying, too, "There since birth, most likely."

      What is causing this, is known, and written about in the 1960's, in research.  They are drugs in child birth and early umbilical cord clamping, called Active Management. This hasty clamping and the drugs causes brain lesions, and other internal problems.  Please read, pages 48-50, Chapter, Time Bomb, of   The Magical Child , written by an educator, Joseph Chilton Pearce.

    We can all recall reading in newspaper stories about the child, the athletic-willed child, pushing himself/herself and dropping dead, in sports. An autopsy revealed a hole in the heart. This is true of heart murmurs, evident in many children, and to discover them, may take special experience to detect, in some situations.  

    The cause of the hole in the heart is not always bad genes, as the docs want us to believe, but man-caused by low blood pressure and volume, caused by impatience and the medical person doing early umbilical cord clamping, at birth. They are not waiting for the natural completion of the child's birth, the placenta out, naturally, and all pulsation of the umbilical cord ceased, with no tying or clamping of it, at all.  Only if the cord tore, is there a evidence of fact need to clamp the cord.  We must be all told this fact, and this is no clamping procedure is  true for all placenta birthing mammals.

     It has been witnessed, the natural third stage of labor, if not intervened, can take between twenty and forty minutes for true completion of the child's birth. We have all heard of the unassisted birth, and the baby thrives, if all that was provided was warmth and clean towels and blankets.   All must be patient, in a child's birth, including the mother and the father, too.  

    The umbilical cord can be witnessed pulsating for up to twenty minutes.  Often that is for a child that had a compressed cord, and for a drugged child.  One cannot see a compressed cord in a vaginal birth, so policies directing any early cord clamping, in my opinion, such as the common new delayed of a mere  30-second clamping, must be questioned before a court of law for child abuse, in both criminal and the civil court for compensation.  All children, even c-section babies can remain unclamped and uncut from their placentas.  This is a fact of science and research of T. Peltonen, see Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com.

FACTS OF THE NEONATE'S CIRCULATION:

    The by-pass windows, of the heart, such as  the foramen ovale has a flap on it, according to S. Madder, Inquiry Into Life and she also said that the ductus arteriosus, another by-pass window of the fetus's circulation, will be sealed up by cell tissue. I believe that these openings will soon seal, after birth,  but only if the child is NOT caused to be low of nutrient, or low blood volumed and pressured caused by immediate cord clamping.

    Dr. George M. Morley, a retired obstetrician and gynecologists, shares most of these concerns, too.  Some biology textbooks indicated the sealing of these by-pass windows may take over a year to seal.  This I say, is only likely, if the child's blood volume cannot be increased. In some situations, after early clamping, and without informed knowledge, blood expanders given to keep the blood vessels from collapsing, are given an early clamped child.

    Only if the parents get all billings of the child's care, and code will they know the true extent of the care and treatment after a child's birth. Some babies had open heart surgery needlessly, and some did die, for holes in the heart, that may have been merely related to low blood volume and pressure, and preventable by delayed umbilical cord clamping, or none, at all.  In fact, my own cousin was the first baby to die, of an experimental open heart surgery done in the Vancouver General Hospitals, in the late 1950's.    

LOW RED CELL COUNT AND JAUNDICE:

     How many times have you heard doctors worry about high blood pressure, but not low pressure, eh?  Do they even test the child for blood pressure after birth, or a few days later for red blood cell count?  

    The jaundice of most actively managed babies is more likely to be caused by iron overload. This is by too many red cells dying, at one time, and insufficiency of red blood volume  to use up the iron, now in excess that the liver cannot store it or the spleen. The red cell takes 7 days to be mature to be released into the blood stream.

    The normal red cell will function for 120 days.  Millions of red cells are created and die daily, but the iron is reused.  And, n the event of blood loss, or deprivation by early cord clamping, the baby's immune system is low of all nutrients, enzymes, proteins, interferon, stem cells, platelets, for that strength, and the child may remain anemic for a very long time.

    These vulnerable children will certainly be more vulnerable to injections of any live viruses in vaccinations and to metals used as preservatives, such as mercury. These now weakened babies may fair better not being vaccinated, until they can make a legal decision, knowing of their vulnerability, at birth, and the possibility, they may be living with a brain lesion, that can be made worse by vaccinations and fevers, often associated with multiple injections.

      It is not wise to inject babies that were early cord clamped, or were born premature,and/or were under 5 pounds.  No child needs to have a needle inserted at birth, for the very spot of injection may have risked a slow or fast acting virus to enter the child's broken skin. This may be true, also, for a fine needle withdrawal of blood, that the parents do not have to give consent to do to such risk taking to any newborn child or a vulnerable child.

PRIVACY OF GENETIC INFORMATION BREACHED:

    This again, is a preventable condition if the cord is not clamped early. Other conditions of jaundice are associated with various drugs given during labor, such as morphine, Demerol.  Some drugs are unavoidable, only, in a c-section. Death to the red cells are caused by early cord clamping, oxygen debt, and the toxicity of the drugs.  

    It is testable, that all gases and drugs and injections cross the placenta.  The forensic testing of the placenta's cells and blood in it, are the means of such evidence, if an obstruction of justice, did not prevail in the destroying of such evidence, or failure to document the child's own medical charts of such facts.  

    That is why the parents have a legal right to keep the placenta in their own freezer, as would be the case, if they birthed unassisted in their own homes.  This is the protection their baby's placenta and genetic information is properly destroyed or NOT donated to science research or sold as to how the hospital wishes it discarded.

    The past information, reveals some hospitals did release the placentas to drug companies, cosmetic companies,  and/or to burn tissue banks, and to Federal, State, and Provincial grants in stem cell research projections and transplantations. The sending of the organs and tissue and blood, in most cases, were done without informed consent or knowledge of the parents, the legal guardians of the child, that DNA and genetics codes were made available in a breach of privacy to others, on these issues mentioned.

Low blood pressure and volume puts a heart to greater distress:

    In a child's birth, the medical persons do believe low blood volume is not a concern, this is after they have imposed, without informed consent, early umbilical cord clamping on most babies being actively managed, and the mother, too. The facts are a heart with less volume and pressure as was designed for its need, must work harder to send the blood to the brain and other organs, when it is working with less volume, and with less nutrients, as well. It may then have to draw oxygen and blood form muscles and other tissues, regarded as less important for the survival of main organs, lungs, heart, and brain and the central nervous system. This is logical. See a Medical Opinion of Dr. George M. Morley .

HARVESTING BABIES FOR PROFITS:

     Do doctors actually believe, just because they have a living child, they have done no harm, internally, to the child, by blood volume lowered?  And,  that they had a legal right to sell the deprived blood?  The reports on the internet, (Australia) are that as much $30,000 has been paid for a few ounces of stem cells. In transplantation, it was stated on a tv news release that a stem cell transplantation can cost, in the experimental stages, $125,000.  They stated the $25,000 went to the collector of the stem cells needed for that particular persons needs.

     It is the newborn baby, that is most likely to be exploited for profits, the policies of clinical studies to harvest any one child, being used as a bogus alibi, to show disrespect and duty to the child. Even the circumcision of children  has the removed skin tissue banked, and without informed consent.   The duty of donation of blood, is to the informed adult, over the age of 17, over 110 pounds, and known to be in good health. The health of a premature baby cannot be determined in 30-seconds, or for any child, or animal, that is placenta-born. Yet, premature babies were and are being harvested of their placenta blood by early umbilical cord clamping and they have not been protected from this violation of child abuse, in most Nations.  I believe this because the children are revived (1 in 16 in Canada) and show no outward physical evidence of their internal impairments, latent, in discoveries, in most instances.  

    The facts of the amount of blood taken, in news stories released to the public, at large, did not share the amount of blood actually taken from the child, and how early the cord was clamped to take that amount of blood, the average blood collection being up to 180 ml. The 9-pound  baby, full term, only creates 500 ml total blood volume,  or 10 ounces.   Nor, did they mention, if at a later date, the child, itself had to have blood expanders, or a blood transfusion, after the baby's blood was taken and given to another's cause, or financial enhancement, reward for the collected blood but wrongfully deprived the owner/infant of security of person.   

     In one case, a mother request her child be early clamped, and it was done, assuming that was the standard of care.  The mother stored the blood, thinking keeping the baby's blood was better then pouring it down the drain, a normal conception, that the early clamping is a necessary procedure, and the blood in the placenta wasted by all hospitals.  Not so.  Only diseased blood may actually be destroyed.

    I doubt wasting so precious a tissue, blood, ever was true, wasting of a product, blood, because of its known practical use by all medical fields.  One cannot come to the defence of any professional person when they have done things, not in the open, and with informed rights not to endangering the child of any unncessary procedures, or risk taking. ICC and ECC are not necessary to be done, ever, unless, again, the cord tore ( a dropped child birthed outside of a safe gravity birth position)  or for a c-section mistake, of a placenta previa, the knife cut into the cord or the placenta.  

    Nine months later, this baby boy was on the news, CBC, being sick, with a blood disorder, now only getting back stem cells, not his whole blood.  It was never told the public, how big the child was at birth, was he a premature baby, c-section or vaginal birthed baby, his size, and wieght, and how much blood was taken, from the placenta, and how soon the cord was clamped.  How can the public make an informed decision no harm is being risked to babies, our future, when the National News Services willfully withholds this information and supports stem cells collected form the unprotected newborn citizen?  This is a shame of any Nation withholding such information to make informed decisions and protecting the child by our implied duty, as adults.

    The follow up if these babies whether they are yet alive  or their present state of health, and if they were ever anemic, or jaundiced ought to be shared.    See CBC TV The  National,  Peter Mansbridge's story and  See CTV premature baby gives blood to mother, at
Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com.  

OTHER VALUED PROTEINS/HORMONES, OVER AND ABOVE STEM CELLS:

      Interferon, that destroys all virus, discovered in the 1950's, can be obtained from the blood stream, likely released by any person caused distress. Such would be the case a child, during active management, in an institutional birth or controlled homebirth by a license registered-nurse-midwife. This is because the position of flat on the back and semi-sitting positions are known to distress both the mother and the child by closing the birth canal up to 30 percent.  

    Birth positions that are known harmful is one way of distressing the child, along with induction of abortion drugs, like oxyotcin  and its effects tapered by morphine, Demerol, being mixed with the drugs offered to women, using institutional's policies of active management.

     In the taking of interferon,  the value stated in one case-law, was that the lab and the doctor, had received $3 Billion dollars within 3 months of the lab's development in a special MorLine cultivation of cells. Many of the current College and University biology textbooks, use this John Moore  example, which was settled out of court.  They share this case for teaching situational ethics and decisions of students and implied is for the next leaders, to choose, "Can a person have power of self-determination regarding what is or is not done with his DNA and organs removed from his body, as to be burned or used in a practical way, deemed the right of society to take, with or without informed consent?

     When you see the profits to be made from the collection of tissues, $3 billion dollars , and you are on the receiving end of threat for that kind of money, that the average lay person, has no idea just how great that amount is, would turn anyones ethics, upside down, eh! That is no informed consent, to the individual from whom DNA genetic information and tissues are being taken.

     It is like putting the sick down, if you are the beneficiary of the Will, and the choice in the allowing the person to live another 10 years, and you are patiently waiting to manage the Estate, eh!

     Today, we have family members, who have no respect for each other, so it is not surprising babies, today are being exploited, too.  I have witnessed the joining in, of siblings, with nurses, following a prescribed increased lethal drugging and to help hold their 47-year old brother down, his making known, he was being "screwed" as he was being injected, against his will, not willing and not seeing it his duty to die, just yet.  As was witnessed for him to die, by all in his family, with their limit to pay $100.00, a day, for his palliative care, eh. His disease, alleged to be fatal, was not released to be the cause of death, so I suspect enhancement of death (against his known will) to be euthanasia, alleged legal in British Columbia, Canada, by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), not trained, perhaps, adequately on the criminal codes or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, that covers all persons, regardless of mental or physical disadvantages.  This person was on a disability, so he was not respected for equal protection once he went inside a public medical service institution.  Immediate appeal to a Supreme Court Judge was blocked for Next Friend application for an emergency life over death situation.  Money was a factor blocked to his friends alleged to be $20,000 up front for a law firm to assist in the application this man's rights be respected and he be told others were there to take over his burden of care, if too great by his own family to bear.

    The injections contrary were contrary to his known care plan and control.  And, the injections were increased and imposed against this man's known will, and his death involved induced insulin shock, and then morphines were increased, in a caused dehydrated body (food supplements taken away), to enhance his death.  Again, in B.C., the powers that be, did all that they could to block the use of the Courts for Next Friend's appeal for life of the helpless. This being those who could not advocate for themselves.  Family, too, can have conflict of interest in going along with a fatal disease allegations and block all last hope of supplements and prayer, when the person was seen to get better, with informed consent to accept the help from his friends and food supplements and distilled water and bread he liked to eat.  

    Might he be alive today, had he had the advocacy in the Courts to hear quickly, this matter?  But, like the matter of harvesting of the babies, this issue, too, is being currently blocked financially. Again, in the case of the 47 year old man, there was a want of $20,000 to $40,000 for the law firm's fees requested, and in any case, there would have been no access to the court for a life and death situation, stating a Next Friend's application could not be heard, in British Columbia's Courts, stating a firm delay, of 3 months. And further blockage was to go to the medical society to have another doctor speak against another doctor's prescribed fatal diagnoses rather than the friend having the Judge hear, friends would look after their friend if they could at least get to see him, and when out of an induced insulin coma, but he was being blocked from the friends who did want to help, his doctors, in charge, not accessible, approachable, or even their names given.  

THE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY DISADVANTAGED NOT HAVING ADVOCATES as stated by the CONSTITUTION & CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, the medical persons not being educated on such rights, or the Criminal Codes of Canada, or perhaps, other nations, as well.

    Just like the babies, not having any representation to the organizations making such policies, and the parents not being able to be reached to be informed, the medical policies are bogus.  In this case, the man was alleged to have iron overload and congestion of the lungs, perhaps, TB, treatable by antibiotics, if true.

     At one time, Next Friends of those who cannot advocate for themselves, was permitted, by the  Supreme Court Judge, to hear if a man could have friends take over his care.  Today, that advocacy is not now to the individual, but being deceitfully assigned to private interest groups, like doctors, or government civil servants, like social workers and not any one member of the community, the public, at large.  That is frightening how the Charter and Constitution and the criminal codes are been not seen to be upheld.  This man's fate, as was the child who was born, alive, but under 5-pounds, sealed when their life was being deemed a burden to his own family.  The family and the medical nursing staff were blocking this man's choice to receive his friend's provided supplements which were donated, and which he voluntarily took.  

    The facts were seen,  the 47-year old man was getting better, and was struggling against injections against his will. I witnessed not even having yellowing of the skin, in the 2 1/2 days of the medically approved supplements added  to his diet.  This man, age 47, was dead within 3 weeks of some doctor alleging  the person had a fatal disease, eh.  His care was witnessed,  in my home town, a community, now apparently fearful of not having sufficient doctors in small communities.  We must wonder if we now are ratifying the philosophy of Hitler's, the strong pick on and eliminate the weak, who have no choice in the decisions, eh?

HOW TO GET FACTS IF YOUR CHILD HAS BEEN VICTIMIZED, OR ANOTHER PERSON:

     The records of incomes and expenses must be kept by all doctors, midwives, and institutions, and labs. Stem Cell blood banks must have a registration of who is qualified to collect blood for compensation, or assurance the blood collected is not contaminated by correct management. A court on an Official Inquiry for documents can require the records checked, and all billings.   

    Some medical persons (including midwives who may collect for private lab  institutions) will risk the child for endangering for a mere $150.00 per quality of blood samples sent to stem cell blood banks, or at the most $250.00, paid to the placenta blood collector. They are not getting the windfall. Stem cells called cord blood is simply placenta blood drained through the cord.  For their fees, it is hardly a fair trade for the exploited child, that others did not treat the child's rights with respect. This is true, if those getting the donated blood, may benefit at the higher windfall of a possible $30,000 for an adult's sized stem cell collection for either stem cells or the even more valued, interferon cells.  

     Such records are facts of records, and can be checked at the court's discretion, and who all has been harvesting the baby's deprived blood; and I say, stolen stem cells and interferon, and other nutrients worth billions on the open medical markets, of today, can be found in accounting records of all stem cell blood operations, around the world.   

    This may be true for organs from the dead, or taken from any operation.  It may be wise to have all medical procedures on video tape from now on, eh? Or, a birth witness or operation witness in the Operating Room, eh?

ATTITUDE - IF THE MEDICAL CONSUMER LIVES, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE OF THEIR MEDICAL CARE GIVEN:

    The pregnant mothers, being actively managed, cut, drugged, embarrassed for "medical Policies" imposed on them, making being pregnant a sickness, or a mental condition, those involved in the care, think that  because the mother lives, she will not have internal latent disorders of thyroid problems by the drugs used?  Particularly, to the commonly used oxytocin / pitocin with the preservative, Chlorobutanol, in it?

    The facts are, internal harm can be latent, by the drugs offered in pregnancy, and virus in slow developing for any cut in the body, surgically imposed during a child's birth.  Active  management is about no true informed consent. This is because there was no choice for safer natural birth. We must ask "Why is that, and the lack of provision for it, even in a rented hospital room?  

    The facts are, experts do know about the benefits of warm water births, undrugged births, uncut births (c-section or episiotomies), and gravity birth positions, and freedom to move around and have nourishment.  However, the allowance of the return to primal birth traditions, now called Lotus Birth, are not financially rewarding as is the present trend, of very controlled active management.  

    The latter is politically inspired. Active Management, world wide, is worth billions in the baby business.  This can include exploiting the child, for their stem cell blood trapped in the placenta, by early cord clamping policies. the policies can visually be seen to be bogus, as to true medical need.  Not everyone would approve the premature babies are to be put down, by a bogus policy of deprivation of the essentials for life which is the baby's legal right to full blood transfusion of their own blood from the placenta into their expanding lungs.

    According to Judith S. Mercer, who privately shared with me, that the premature babies have more stem cells to be collected, then do full term babies.  Following ICC at birth, many premature babies are then continued to be blood sampled, up to 10 to 15 percent total blood volume , every 2nd and 3rd a fact of Canadian research.  When the premature baby dies, it was thought too small to live, and the baby's organs, are then harvested, as the child died for want of volume of oxygenated blood and nutrients. The death is unnatural death by shock - low blood volume and pressure. But the prescribed death certificate, by the medical persons in attendance, is death by natural causes. The doctors are going with impunity, not to be questioned or checked by the Coroner's offices, locally, and governed by the State, Province, or Territory.  Our civil rights, one by one, are not being protected, as we are too busy to care for one another, or at least the sick and the vulnerable.

NATURAL BIRTH ALLOWANCES ARE KNOWN BY THE EXPERTS:

    The good of these medical directives, for choices for the pregnant and birthing mother were stated in Policy #71, December 1998,  by the Society of Obstetricians and Gyncologists of Canada (SOGC), gravity births, and warm water births.  The rest of their policies, particularly, Policy #89, May 2000 , directed immediate cord clamping on all babies, for a pH cord gas blood test. There are facts of safer methods to do pH tests, rather than to stop the baby's circulation system of oxygenated blood and volume and pressure of it.  A fine needle sample for example.

COLLECTIVELY AND SEVERALLY ACCOUNTABILITY TO MEMBERS OF MEDICAL SOCIETIES - IS IT POSSIBLE?:

    In my opinion, such medical directives, are worthy of being challenged in the courts, in both civil and criminal courts.  I would go as far to say, that there is likely vicarious liabilities to each member of these medical expert associations. That may include those who did not quickly step aside from visually seen bogus policies, in a letter form; and to those that permitted the training in such trends, as was the contract to protect the public, including babies as full citizens, of  the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons, for licensing, to be accountable collectively, as a group, as well as severally. Why might be the accountability be to the entire membership.  They directly or indirectly will benefit from an caused injured person, it is repeat business to the medical persons, treating the ill, and not preventing internal injuries, which are possible, during natural birth.

    And might the various medical associations that joined to protect the public, be considered added as third parties when the bogus policies were "followed?".  And, I say, the policies were being wrongfully used, and not reported as bogus, but being used as a defense. And that, in my opinion, is a bogus alibi used to escape accountability and responsibility, to any victimized child. Or, that the bogus policies were being used  to control the woman's body without her control or informed consent or choice for primal birth tradition, declining, active management, as her informed rights to have a natural birth education and practice. The mother's best of health being her choice of priority, not forced to have her body cut, when she believed she was not in danger, and wants her body to birth naturally, not cut, as her informed choice, or drugged, nor her baby's early cord clamped, if ever done, as to Primal Birth Traditions, now called Lotus Birth.

    Why do I think that?  Who gets to determine the pregnant women's care?  Herself?  Her doctor?  Or, the State?  All others using the medical services, get to make informed choices, except for the pregnant lady. This is a form of discrimination as to the womens' sexuality and can bear children.  When she is pregnant, other determine she is not mentally capable of making a decision, so they say. And the doctors also are making  a decision on the quality of the life of the child, by early umbilical cord clamping, not necessary to be done, at all.  How do you judge this, now, if you were a jury?  Let's say, the woman could have birthed her babies, naturally, no drugs, in a warm water birth; without a c-section. But only the fear of the doctors forced the c-section, by lying about the natural progression of the birth of the child.  And that they did lie about the clamping of the cord and the amount of blood taken from the placenta and how and why tested or used; Nor could prove the placenta discarded by burning, and its contents .

     All the medical associations are organized, and had licensing approved  for the protection of the public, not to their own financial or political self-interests. Nor, could their own policies, ever undermine a woman's right to informed consent and to say "NO, as to what is done or not done to her person, and no woman can be forced to have her body cut, to birth one baby, or more, ever.  And this is true to all persons and advocacy for the weak must not be appointed to any one society or group, but for the duty of any "one" concerned member of our society to speak for those who cannot.

FORCED C-SECTION NOT LEGAL IN THE UK:

    The ruling is availabe in the UK, British Medical Journal, when a Judge thought he could order a woman, deemed, not mentally fit to make a decision on her rejection of a c-section.  A c-section was imposed her.  She went to the highest court and she won that not even a judge could order a woman's body cut to deliver a child, ever.  

    The facts are, the C-sections, in the history of the Catholic Encyclopedia, reveal that c-sections were reserved only for the sparing of the child's life, if the woman, had died by some accident.  Forced c-sections, on women who believed their body was capable of birthing in a natural position, in my opinion, constitutes bodily offenses, and assault, and battery. Control over the woman's own body,. must be in her own domain, regardless the condition of her body, in birth decisions, her position of birth, and in injections, if any ; and where she will give birth to her best environment and her chosen aides, if any.

    Babies, just because they are in a breech position, or are one of multiple births, do not make them a need to be born by c-sections, nor early clamped, even  if they are born by c-section, being removed, as their protective right , taken as a sealed unit, attached to their cord and their placenta. (See T. Peltonen, www.lotusbirth.com)

     Natural births for multiple births,  has been known to be done, and was the right of choice of the mother of the children.  Natural births happened in the family home of the 1934, Quintuplets born in Callander, Ont., Canada, The Dionne Sisters.   

     It would appear that medical consumer's choice of what is best practice possible least risk of harm, on these raised concerns, will not be improved without the encouragement of the courts.  

    The internal debate of when to clamp the umbilical cord, as been debated, long enough, for the last two hundred years, and the visual evidence, is that the best to the newborn creature, animal or a human being, is to leave their umbilical cord alone, unclamped, or untied, please.  For a cord around the neck, the correct procedure is to put a finger between the neck and the cord, or a sponge, to prevent neck injury. But not cut the child off his/her lifeline of oxygenated blood and natural nutrients and immunities. If it is not broke, don't touch.  It may be as simple as that.

THE TWO HUNDRED YEAR DEBATE - leave the cord alone:

    See Dr. Erasmus Darwin's disclosure, at www.lotusbirth.com  or at www.lotusbirth.com  When good is not done from shared knowledge, ethics, the law, visual facts and along with common sense, one must look at one other motives, that may involve political interests, involving, "Survival of the Fittest, as E. Darwin was the grandfather of Charles Darwin.  The good of any statement, and its truth, can be used however the knowledge shared can be exploited.  

    Facts:  Early clamping does not result in the child's death, Erasmus Darwin , simply stated, the child will be "weakened" because more blood will be left in the placenta, that otherwise, ought to be inside the child. What is implied here, is "ownership of property" must be respected, the blood is the baby's and none others.  You don't take the baby's blood to make another more fit. The babies have no obligation or duty to share that blood nor can another imposed a duty to take it from a child's needs for their "own" optimal health. Babies have not caused another's sickness.

    E. Darwin knew natural law, his duty, and spoke the truth - do no harm, implied as to the Oath of the medical professionals.  How the visual facts of truth, may be exploited was to the conscience of the medical person who did the voluntary decision making when he/she saw the baby's size, sex, color, or possibly perceived mental and physical disadvantages, and would know the child's race and social status in the community.  All may be applied, in the split decision of the voluntary act in their choice of the  timing of the clamping of the lifeline and quality of life, that may be then lived.  The child may be discriminated to competition of careers and choices by any oxygen debt to the brain, or length of life to be lived, by injuries by dehydration of any cells, causing them to burn out sooner, or not function, at all.  Any one cell damaged may have been responsible to direct 10,000 other cells.

    Today, as was true in the past, that kind of medical information may have persuasive considerations in the timing of the clamping of the umbilical cord.  And, of course blood types and amount of stem cells that are likely to be extracted and other nutrients from the vulnerable child's private property, his/her placenta.

FIDUCIARY TRUST :

    In Canada, as well as in the United States, and in other Nations, the policies of active management are happening without true informed consent, a violation of fiduciary trust  to the uneducated mother and father. Neither can protect their child when the medical person or persons have the power of choice, only, perceived to their organization and crating policies the plan to impose on others.

    In reality, the doctors do NOT have that kind of power.  They don't have that choice by law.  But , the trusting and uneducated mothers, world wide, are vulnerable. In actuality, the medical persons involved in the participation of early umbilical cord clamping, are choosing how long and when to do hand-squeezing, of the cord, too.  Telling the mother they have no clamping tool in the room.  A man's hands can be the weapon.  

    When finger squeezing is used on the cord, it may be considered a release and let go method of interrupting the child's heart's flow of normal blood from the placenta.  The uninterrupted blood from the placenta, stops the natural role of the placenta acting as the constant pressure foot, and now a human hand is determining the volume and pressure, and the release of it, at their will, not nature's.

    This is a  guess, of another's choice of what is good for another's child, to be used in a lesson to students of what is good and evil. There must be a better way of logic and the use of pictures of the fetus circulation system, transferring to the neonate/adult circulation system, the placenta blood into the child's expanding lungs.  I  have provided such a diagram and it is not medically challenged for need of any corrections, at this time.

    Hands, or tools can be a weapon, and this depends how they are used by the skill and ethics of a medical person.  What is a concern is the mothers in birth are not seeing the care of their child's umbilical cord, nor the fathers, nor, do they in most instances, know anything to make an informed  choice to go with the natural birth traditions that were known and practiced by their grand grandmothers, or those pioneers that birthed unassisted, in their own homes prior to the 1920's. In those days, unassisted births assured each child to be born equal, for equal opportunities in normal development, in most instances.

     Many think that all our grandmothers had midwives. But, that is not true.  Many women just birthed with family members to assist, if needed. Many women birthed in warm water tubs, they had no drugs, other then herbs, and they did not remove or tie off or cut  the cord from the placenta.  That is  the truth.  I heard of this myself, when I was age 14. I did NOT understand the wisdom for the pioneer's logic. From my research, it is now logical to me. By not tying off the cord, or cutting the cord, the pioneer babies had no navel hernias ; no blood infections ; and the child was stronger because they got all their blood transfused from the placenta into the child's expanding lungs and with natural immunities. The means to do the transfusion was the infant's own heart. If the cord was pulsating, or would pulsate again, this trusted means of natural exchange of organs design would be to the child's benefit, if not, unfairly, interrupted.

    Such persons, today, are living into their 90's, and some older, and some lived to 101 like the Queen Mother, born in her  parent's home.  This is also true and the case of my own parents, who were unassisted births, now both age 90, my mother, to be 91 this June 25th, 2004, God willing.  

LATENT DISORDERS:

    Many internal conditions are latent in discovery or are thought normal, as they are happening so frequently because the medical persons are  following questionable active management, in most births, today.  These are the conditions associated with active management, in particular, immediate cord clamping, stated by Dr. George M. Morley,  MB ChB, retired in 1999.  This Declaration, sent to me,  is dated, August 29, 2001:

    "I am willing to testify and offer proof that immediate cord clamp; at birth causes attention deficit disorder, learning disabilities, behavioral disorders, mental retardation, respiratory distress, syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, and cerebral palsy.  Signature witnessed  by Martha L. Roberts, Notary Public, Leelanau County, Michigan.

    Dr Morley further sated, "That the interruption of the placenta supply of oxygen and blood by means of a cord clamp before the lungs are functioning and before the child has attained an optimal blood volume may cause permanent injury to the child.  That immediate after the birth of "all" children, the cord and placenta continue to supply the child with oxygen and blood.  "That after the lungs are supplying the child with oxygen and after the child has received enough blood from the placenta for optimal survival the cord vessels close naturally."

    Dr. Morley's statements are NOT opinion.   They are visual, facts of observation of any mammal's birth, human or animal .  Why then do we have bogus policies directed by drug companies influencing the training of most medical persons.  One can read the bogus statements by the Merck Manual, who may influence the  training of doctors, and that they have a conflict of interest, for they often sell the drugs used in child birth, and the tools, as well.   

    Another drug supplier of medical instruments is Dupont, also directed immediate cord clamping, using the quotations given them by the World Health Organization, to justify their clamping and cutting tool, called the Umbicut, built with a shield to protect the clamping person, for the threat of alleged blood-borne disease, if the cut, a red, firm, and pulsating  and functioning umbilical cord.  (See www.lotusbirth.com, Table of Contents.

     The Merck Manual , on line, is quoted to their teaching:    "One breath and clamp the cord."  

    That was for all children to be treated equally, a standard routine, one policy fits all.  They made no allowance if the child may have had a compressed cord eh, during birth.  Or,  if the child had a drugged and slowed heart beat.

      And medical persons actually took them "seriously." These illogical directives not getting informed consent or warnings the clamping needs not be done, at all, ever, but is a cosmetic removal. Nor, when they instructed did they direct to have informed consent on the organs and blood may be discarded, burning, or saving in the child's own blood bank reserve.  

    By failing to deal with such issues, I wonder if the hospitals and doctors involved, believed that the removed or amputated organ, the placenta and contents, became State property?  The common rights of the parents would be that the placenta and contents are under their approval and informed consent, for their legal guardianship of that child or babies.  

    Only a court, before the fact, could rule the baby's placenta and contents to be the State's Property and not the legal owner/infant, in the care of the legal guardian, the parent or parents. Early cord clamping and taking of the placenta blood have not had that State law, or Provincial or Federal, or Territory, to be so imposed, that I am aware of, in any  Democratic society.  Such would be the Nations of Canada and the USA, and Britain, and other Nations, that declared  the Human Rights for all and due process of law, to avoided rebellion amongst the common folk, if they are NOT deprived of self-determination. And, that the individual and the child is protected to have the family, not the State, ensure health choices as natural common rights.  This means, the good of science research or the good of using blood and tissue, cannot be done without that informed consent.

    The duty to protect the vulnerable of those who cannot advocate for themselves, the child, the mentally and physically, disadvantaged. A woman in childbirth, is not considered mentally unsound to make choices for natural birth education and practice, and/or to decline active management, even to say no, to a c-section or an episiotomy.  ONLY the mother can volunteer to have her body cut, with informed consent, of the need, to birth her baby or babies.  If false or misleading information was given, the mother, in order to get implied consent, how that consent was obtained, if false pretenses,  may be considered a civil, or even a criminal violation, because no true informed consent was actually given.  

    On example, of no true informed consent given, was a case where a woman had an abortion, she later sued because she could not make an true informed decision, as to what was left out, that she could be vulnerable to depression following the abortion.  This happened, and the UK ruled damages, as the duty was to give that information in an appropriate time to make true informed decisions. See British Medical Journal and for the woman who sued for a c-section imposed without her consent, References, legal case-laws:

www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm  

PARENTS-TO-BE ARE NOT BEING  APPROPRIATELY INFORMED OR TRUTHFULLY EDUCATED :

     Lack of education on this issue, to the natural parents, puts them in a situation of being very vulnerable that their baby or babies are going to be exploited if they use the licensed medical person, who are now in a trend of harvesting babies placentas, at this time, as I see this situation, getting out of hand.  We have no babies to spare of any one drop of blood , taken without true parental consent, and without undue pressure to obtain that consent, freely given by all information to make an informed decision.

     And Colleges and Physicians and Surgeons, apparently have been allowing bogus information in policies by ACOG and SOGC, and in some published medical emergency manuals. And, that 9-1-1 counsellors too, were stating to tie off the cord with any dirty shoe lace, as an imperative medical need.  The emergency person, doing this and cutting the cord, would have no means to revive the child with his/her blood, if they went limp and gasped with their circulation and oxygen cut off before their lungs were functioning, at all.  They would have been directly or indirectly exposed the child to a germ or bacteria, or a virus (fast or slow acting) by the directions to use anything unsterilized, such as dirty shoe lace to tie off a cord, that needed not to be tied, if the cord had not become torn.

    Such directions from alleged qualified persons, trained, to me are not logical, if the matter were taken to a reasonable Judge and Jury. (See the Chow-case-law, Ontario, Canada, handled by Sommers and Roth). Did the child live? Yes, but the child lives as blind, mute (deaf) paralyzed, if you can call that a life.  All children can be revived, after a medical mistake, and their mothers, too. This child lives with $8 million dollars, but I am sure he would trade $8 million dollars to have a normal life, and his fullest potential returned.  This would be true for the Ing-case-Law, ibid.

    The public at large has also been deceived by movies, showing tying of the umbilical cord while the child is not yet breathing on his own.  These were the Oliver Twist show and the Road to Avonlea, both aired by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation  CBC. These are some of the bogus Hollywood information on management of the human child's lifeline that would bring charges of cruelty to animals if seen done on any other dumb animal severed of its means of blood and oxygen.  

     Why should the endangering of any one child be allowed to happen in our own communities, just because children live from endangering by unnecessary medical procedures?  The medical policies are bogus and they do allow for the opportunity to deprive the baby up to 50 percent total blood volume.  This is a fact of visual evidence, if the cord is clamped early and the placenta drained on video camera.  

    The facts are already present in the cord blood banks where the baby's blood is kept, either donated or paid to be stored for a future date.  The take of the average child, is stated to be up to 180 ml by the Cells for Life,  who are located in Markham Ontario.  They state, like other cord blood banks, that there is no risk of harm done to the mother or the child, failing to address the legal security of person, a duty to the child to have not one drop taken from the placenta, until all natural birth has been completed, and all pulsation ceased, meaning, hardly a drop of blood will actually be left in the placenta, and certainly not in the cord.  The cord, when proper birth processes are followed is white, limp, and not pulsating.  Early clamping is done on a firm, red, and pulsating and on a previously functioning organ. I call that child abuse, don't you?  I say many medical professionals are being willfully blind to the visual facts. What do you think?  

CONCEALED MOTIVES:   

      When something is not logical, you look at motives. The medical persons, by information available in current biology textbooks, from the 1980's, to the present time, indicate the medical persons and the medical institutions, have been selling the placenta and the placenta blood, and have done so  without informed consent.  The seriousness of taking 20 to 50 percent or more blood, is revealed in the fact how much blood does a baby create from conception to birth.  Apparently, it is about one ounce more then the total weight of the child.  In pounds, an infant of 9 months gestation, full term, creates at total of 10 ounces of blood, 300 ml.  The Cells for Life  blood bank, in Markham, Ontario, Canada, on the Internet services of their own web site, have staged that their average take of a child's placenta blood was up to 180 ml.  That is visually known to be over 50 percent of the baby's total blood created, from conception, if the baby was 9 pounds and on the larger size of infants.  

    I ask, what parent, informed of such facts, would then risk any chance of weakening their baby, even though they live or would be revived, in a proper hospital environment, supplying oxygen and blood expanders and blood transfusion?  Would a loving parent allow the harvesting of their own baby, and to risk that their child will live, as an child impaired and compromised person, the rest of their life?   And more so, if the child is injected with diseases, with heavy metals, soon after birth, and every two months, thereafter, in a testable, weakened anemic condition, and with perhaps, known predisposition to be pushed over the edge, to then develop latent internal disorders, such as diabetic or autistic condition.

     All this adds to the epidemic of autism in all Nations, who have knowingly or not, been exploiting the newborn citizens.   For the parents, who have not had legal compensation, there is allowing for the adoption of their now impaired child, or to turn the child over to the State the only present solution, when civil actions are not settled.  This is if the impaired child is too much to handle or above the expenses of the parents, to manage, a severely damaged child.

    The reckless following of bogus medical policies, as I see this situation, is a breach of duty and trust.  It IS child abuse requires such a decision of that fact, to be made by a competent and informed court of justice.  We must ask why the elected officials have breached their duty of  Oaths to protect the child in their nations, not exploit them? It makes a mockery of the deaths of the those who went to two Wars, and died that our Nations were not corrupted by those who would undermine the intent of individual's protection as to any Nation's Constitution, or where applicable, contained or implied in any  Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  The latter being a pledge of duty and honour to the State, Province, Territory to any one citizen.  The child, is the newest citizen and the future of that Nation. The child abuse and the deception to the public, at large, on this issue, must stop. It may be as simple as that.

POLITICS AND PROFITS:

        The medical persons, midwives, included, have no good excuse to sway from natural birth education and practice.  But, the medical system is political.  This means it is based on profits, not on good health outcomes, or prevention.  There is no profits in natural birth.  It is simply hands off, the mother is in control, and she goes home with her baby, as what I call a biological, reciprocal, sealed-unit. Nothing is to be removed from her baby, or injected into her baby, ever.  

     The politicians favor the corporation power, because politics is profits. The more the medical services inject and syringe, and scan, the higher the services are, reaching over $20 billion dollars for 4 million births in the USA, as one example of spin-offs, and I say, exploitation, too. But let us keep this budget, so well established, and use 75 percent of it to compensate the past and present victims of the clamp, eh.

     The theory is with the privatation of the medical services the more the corporation make such as the drug companies, higher salaries, more health problems, the greater the return in spin-offs.  We all think economically.   The governments win too. The parents get a living baby.  The State gets it s blood.  The doctors get repeat business and wonder why the baby has a hole in the heart, or has autism, or CP, or MS, or whatever , and they say, it is all bad genes, an epidemic bad genes, everywhere.  That's what they say.

    But when our children are being endangered and exploited for their placenta blood, and weakened, where does the politics stop. And whose duty is it to stop it, if not the parents, the true legal guardians of the child?  Only when the parent or the parents come forward, can we stop this.

    I ask you, when the politicians ignore this issue, for so long, a breach of their Oath, and malfeasance of their duties,  might it be for the reasons they had "inside"  stake holding  shares with those who will get the contract business of public services, eh?  The compromised children are now casting $60,000, per child, per year, if they develop autism.  That is likely to amount to over $5 to 15 million over the impaired's life time. The victims  may never live to their fullest dreams.  Prevention is in education, and in ethics and the law, and in knowing one's duty.

DUTY OF THE COMMUNITY FOR PREVENTION OF HARM TO THE NEWBORN NEONATE:

    The victims suffering are the children. And, society loses by not having fullest abilities developed or their potential of genius allowed.  I see no good of bogus medical policies when so much is lost, for the all mighty buck.  I also see bogus medical policies followed and not reported as child abuse, in another violation of the professional's duty.  I do see this issue as criminal assault on the child.  It is an offense against the person. It causes internal bodily harm.  It is assault even if the child does not die.  It is battery to interrupt the child's circulation system.  And, when the child has died of shock, it is a wrongful death, that ought to have had the respect of a full Community Open Inquiry.  I see the duty in each community to stop this NOW.  See the Petition that can be printed out at: www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-669.htm

PREVENTION OF THE CAUSE OF INTERNAL DISORDERS IS POSSIBLE BY PROPER EDUCATION TO WOMEN AND MEN ABOUT NATURAL CHILD BIRTH:

     The facts of the last three and four generations of women, who had families was that they were not "truthfully"  educated on the actual birth of their child. They simply went to the hospital and signed a form for appropriate care, which was active management. That FORCED APPROPRIATE CARE FORM offers no  true legal defense to the hospital or staff, or doctor, as what does it mean, except a form was signed?  It does not offer informed consent and rejection or declining of endangering to the child for no good cause to interfere with the child's circulation system.

    Parents are not told, by their doctors or care giver, or by any current biology textbook, or their prenatal instructors, that ONLY IF THE CORD TORE OR FOR PLACENTA PREVIA, MIGHT IT BE NECESSARY TO CLAMP THE CORD AND THE CHILD QUICKLY REMEDIED "if" one of those rare incidents did actually happen.  The child will need revival of someone's whole blood and with oxygen, if not provided by the placenta.

ACTIVE MANAGEMENT VS NATURAL BIRTH EDUCATION OR LOTUS BIRTH:

    The trusting women and their spouses were not informed of the intent of the doctor to rush the birth, for whatever reason, to get it over with, and they would be using drugs and not share they intended by their policies or training to clamp the pulsating cord as quickly as was convenient to the doctor.      (See defense provided, world wide for most doctors, at MDConsult, by Dr. Gabbes).  Special paid membership is required at MDConsult and most Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons use this link as part of their reference aids to doctors.

    The CPS do not say this is their actual policy, if doctors use this defense, but knowing this doctor's opinion, telling the doctors to clamp, the cord at their convenience and stating the blood trapped in the placenta is not important, in most instances, is thought as a policy to impose on another's child, without investigation. It can be an issue in both civil and criminal laws, if the parents so defend their child so violated, and the parents not able to say, "No" to any endangering practice, not deemed an essential risk taking; nor a fact of need or benefit to their child, or to the mother's well being.  Fear are not facts of medical need or good policy outside of visual or facts of tests to make an informed decision before an decisive action was taken.

    I was told Dr. Gabbe's opinion, outside of visual evidence of the amount of blood deprived the child, a procedure known to cause the shrinkage of the heart, was the reason that the BC College of Physician and Surgeons (CPS), would not investigate a reported immediate cord clamping of a c-section birth, that a father was concerned, was imposed on his first born child.  (See T. Peltonen's research at Table of Contents, www.lotusbirth.com )

     Even though this full term little girl, did live, the father's own heart almost stopped as he was concerned if his daughter would breathe on her own, off the cord, so suddenly.  She is about 4 years old, today, and is very difficult to manage. The father believes her difficulties are related to being clamped, in the womb, then cut, then removed, while not breathing on her own.  He was not informed of the weight of the placenta or how much blood was drained from it, where it went, or if it was burned or sent to research, and if the tissues were sold by the hospital, or by the doctors, the nurses, or and the lab, involved.

    BC- CPS wrote in their letter to me, that they did not want to spend $15,000 a day, if a complaint was made, on policy training and choice of practice.  The doctors were being allowed choices of unnecessary procedures not consented to by the parents, trusting in no harm done.  That includes not being caused to have raise a highly hyperactive child, often the result of brain damage by oxygen debt, and what limitations that disorder may cause her, in later life.  Or, this child's now created predisposition of further compounded harm should she receive an immunities, particularly, when most vaccinations contain metals, like mercury.  

    I had questioned early umbilical cord clamping used by doctors and nurses of today's practices and policies imposed on the child, with no informed consent, like a prescribed approval of the law courts, or any legal Acts of Parliament to deny equal security to the child.

    I was alerted to the stem cell harvesting of the newborn infants.  It is an issue of private enterprise exploiting of babies, today.  This unethical motive of early clamping on all children is not challenged by any of our politicians. There was no investigation done  by the politicians that the persons informing them and advising them are those that work at the stem cell blood banks, as free enterprise, with shares offered on the stock market, that they have given a good-faith film of the early cord clamping and the condition of the child when deprived of 50 percent total blood volume is good for the child's well-being. And good cause this should be the standard of care for all children, as to SOGC's policy, too.

    They say the doctor does not have to change his method of care and treatment, because the experts, SOGC and formerly ACOG, have done the directing of early clamping on all babies by current policies and directions in emergency manuals used today, by 9-1-1 and other trained ambulance medics.

    The harm to the child being weakened is visual, not opinion. The evidence is in the placenta, too of the deprived nutrients of the blood. But the parents are not advised to not let it be removed from their child, or syringed out; or to take it home and bury it themselves.  The evidence of harm to the child is in the increased revived babies, today, or those left to struggle with low blood volume and pressure, and caused to be in an anemic state.  The child will soon be jaundice, iron overload, caused by both the drugs used and early cord clamping.  

    Because of the low blood volume, in early clamped babies, there will be an increase of holes in the heart, open heart surgery, heart murmurs, and other internal disorders.  (See Winnipeg, 12 children died of open heart surgery).  

     I perceive a breach of the communities involved with child delivery care services of the community's duty to uphold the Criminal codes of the Nation and to uphold the duty to equally protect the security of the child.  

    Children should not be exploited for their suspensions of their blood, deprived them wrongfully, at birth, and worth millions of dollars, to the medical private enterprises, that sell blood components. The amount of blood deprived a child, may be worth over $30,000 for a few ounces, if the blood type is advertised for. This is the amount Australia paid for stem cell transplantation, and now they harvest their own babies.  European blood and Asian blood are the most desired and mixed ethnic groups, as to statements said on the internet. Even parents may exploit their own love-child, if they are told no harm done, and the child lives, after early cord clamping. All records are destroyed or never created as to this assault on the child.  It is regarded as normal and allowed care, if directed by a medical organized group, like ACOG and SOGC.

    The police will not investigate as they have an undertaking not to investigate unless a doctor testifies the procedure is unsafe and child abuse, a criminal offense, the policies, in other words, bogus.  It is possible in today's technology, to exploit any organ or tissue desired, hormones, interferon, stem cells, to name a few marketed tissues, today, and without informed consent.  It is written in policies by ethics boards of most hospitals.  Check it out, and see what they allowed without informed consent in "your" hospital.  You will likely note a member of the legal society that did not uphold or speak to the individual's right of informed consent how organs are discarded, by burning and with the owner's own witness, or another's;  or donated or sold to tissue and blood banks.   

    The threat to each person who thinks this is not important, is that private agencies may have valuable information on your color or race's genetic DNA and RNA codes.  How will those agents use that information if in inappropriate hands?   Some scientists do believe in survival of the fittest and genetic code , and by sex,  can be in the hands of others, who that may be, eh, the privileged race.

    Any organ or tissue (blood  cells) can be safely handled and delivered within 36 hours of its removal from a person's body, dead or alive. It is treated with heparin (rat poison) to keep the blood from clotting.  The facts are, the premature baby is the most vulnerable, because they have more stem cells then do full term babies. The stem cells private industries  have billions of dollars set aside, by the governments, to allow  for experimental research and the baby has the least resistance of defence to have had its blood deprived at birth.  The premature is the most vulnerable to be harvested every 2nd and 3rd day for bogus sampling of blood. The nurses and labs make questionable excuses why they are taking 10 to 15 percent total blood volume, as was stated in a Canadian research paper.  Because the babies live, but with latent internal problems by being harvested, the deception continues the politicians not protect the child, and this is a breach of their duty and Oath to uphold the nation's laws - equal enforcement and security of person.  This is an offense against the person, a child.     See references , www.lotusbirth.com/doc/FEB2003Lotusbirth-110.htm    

    Today, unless a court action has begun, even Laying of Information for criminal hearing of the complaint, there is government and even major news media protection to the privacy on the management of private enterprise in medical services of no investigation and increase of internal disorders and learning and behavior of the youth today, particularly in areas where there are stem cell blood banks or university research.  In Canada, those areas showing increases are Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta. All have private stem cell blood banks.  Other provinces, like Quebec, also have experimental stem cell labs, and this may be so, at each University and medical training center across Canada.  

    For proof, just try to ask for primal birth traditions in the hospital, no clamping or cutting off the placenta from the child.  The doctors say it is dirty, it spreads disease, even if the mother is leaving immediately home, after the birth, in a private room, for a natural birth. Only in primal birth is the woman in control of her body and the baby's care.  However, in active management, the first choice of institutional birth, the hospital and the doctor and the nurses want control over the woman, and over the placenta rights.

    This valuable placenta, full of hormones and enzymes, is worth more than gold, and the blood trapped in it. Often the nurses, feeling threatened of their careers,  are being used as a trusted person, and she is being used to offer drugs without full information they all cross the placenta, and the gases used.  See Medication, Doris Haire's 1997 report, Birth Without Borders, www.lotusbirth.com.

    Nurses being the agents have been known to suggest and sometimes pressure the woman to accept drugs.  No drugs are offered to women unless directed by the doctor or the hospital, or the lab. The mother is not told the long-term side effects, thyroid problems within 10 years, (Chlorobutanol) to herself or the child, are some risks, as well as heart attack and stroke risks.  Nor, are the birthing mothers advised or that all gases and drugs cross the placenta and can cause internal damages to the child.

    If one tries to question who are the  private organ and blood banks taking the organs and tissue and blood from your hospital, and where the placentas, stored in the cooler, go, you will be met with silence of the maternity head nurse and Administration.  There is silence, secrecy, and outright lies.  The nurses, apparently, when asked, don't want to know. The nurses are being willfully blind, in most instances. They, nor the ethical doctors that don't do hasty clamping, are not seeking a political protection by seeking Whistle Blowing Status to bring unethical practices public and for criminal charges against those abetting in a crime on unnecessary medical risk taking and endangering the mother and the child on these issues shared.  

HOW IS THE MOTHER ENDANGERED BY EARLY UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING?:

    The mother is risked that the full placenta if birthed, will leak, and can mix two different types of blood, or different rH factors.  And, it  is not normal to birth a full placenta because the proper method of care is the placenta shrinks in size because the baby draws all the blood from it into his/her expanding lungs.  This may actually take 20 -minutes.  But this is not time efficient, so doctors use drugs requiring immediate cord clamping.

    The placenta, if it is expelled by no clamp;clamping of the cord, will be seen to be very small, a flat cake when expelled, and it need not be removed from the child, and this is the right of the mother not to do this cosmetic removal. This was the normal was the practice of our grandmothers, before the began to birth in hospitals after the 1920's, they really had no other choices, the midwives, that witness the births, could not attend the births, any longer.  Their training was not upgraded, as to clean cloths, clean hands, causing what doctors, caused, too, Puerperal Fever. (Read the history of See Dr. Ignaz Phillpp Semmelweis ).  All medical persons, male and females, doctor or midwife caused the death of 12 out over 100 women by dirty hands, and clothing.  Any operation was the same, unsafe, until cleanliness and drugs and antiseptics were used, which began after 1865.  

    By the 1900's, with the blood typing and the RH factors known by 1914, active management and higher medical fees, found the birth care to become an exclusive work of the dominate males in the medical professions.  They made the baby business what it has become, a $20 Billion business, in the USA, and what it may become with private medical care services in Canada, too.  But the active managed babies are no stronger for the cost.  these babies have had offenses done to their persons, no fault of the mothers, who are uneducated. The babies , some now adults, have many internal damages, related to active management policies.

     The organization of the powers-that-be, have prevented Natural Birth Education,  which promotes warm water births, rather than drugs ; freedom of movement and natural nourishments, for strength renewed for a woman in contraction discomfort.  The nourishment given by hospitals is by  IV hook ups, to allegedly prevent dehydration, but then they, without consent, switch to morphine and oxytocin, to bring the birth on for the convenience of control hours of labor, now deemed a risk if over 15 hours, or so.

    That is, in most situations, is  manipulation of time efficiency, I would say, as no child's birth can be so regulated to a standard of time, as is set to active management policies, made law to be imposed on all women, if they enter a hospital's domain without a signed birth contract.  

    It is not the mothers fault, if the child now shows holes in the heart, or other internal disorders.  We are the 3rd and 4th generation that the mothers are not educated to keep to primal birth care practices, even in institutional birth environments, as their legal right. Primal birth traditions or Natural Birth Education, is now called Lotus Birth (lotusbirth).

HOW TO PROTECT A VIOLATED CHILD:

     If you did not know to prevent latent injuries with a signed Birth Contract, and the child was early clamped or risked internal injuries by drug with Demerol (morphine) or Oxytocins, Pitocin, Syntocinon, Toesen, even cytotex, or misoprostol, then only a Writ of Summons can protect the child's legal rights for compensation filed before the child becomes an adult, likely about age 18, plus the time limit for filing an action. To wait that long may risk medical files going missing.  Why not file, immediately.  This allows the records and billings and all copies of health files placed in the child's Legal Complaint filed.  This provides for an APOLOGY and settlement with the right to go public.

    The costs awarded can help for the extra costs for the child's health, if compromised, and special education costs, if autism or attention deficient labels are given the child, or for if behavior problems become apparent, at a latent stage. Latent stages of birth trauma become often apparent about the ages 7 and 9, when the child fails to progress normally in the academics, in comparison to those children not having active management imposed, or as severely damaged.  Don't settlement without the apology and right to go public, or you do not stop the problem from repeating to another's child.  

    Suggestions in Filing:  File as a Next Friend,or Litigation Guardian.   By commencing the Complaint, allows the Litigator to obtain the information and records, and billings for breach of trust and endangering to the child, or even the mo, if allowed to be pursued as a Class action, two or more persons, with similar complaints, to be actively managed in most birth institutions.  

    When there was no factual evidence for the risk taking, the likely motives are in active policies, or now retired policies,  that gave opportunity for time efficiency in management of the third stage of labor, and for harvesting the newborn child's placenta blood.  All billings and tests and reports can then be obtained in a process of Discoveries, before the trial date is set. Interrogatories are another form of questioning a person's training and skills and policies of the hospital or medical institute in the training of the medical person(s) for licensing.  The questions are filed in the Court File, and the answers are subject to perjury.  

PLOYS OF THE DEFENCE, IF YOU MUST ACT ON YOUR OWN CHILD'S BEHALF WITHOUT A LAW FIRM TO ASSIST:

    If the defendants try to rush the trial before all billings, records, training, policies, "bogus" clinical studies,  are received, or Discoveries,  you must check out the procedure for a Continuance of the trail.  It is important to know the Rules of the Particular Court you have filed in, which should be for personal injury, in the Supreme Court.  If you use a law firm for a contingency fee, or a class action, have a list of steps they intend to inform you about, on a regular basis.

     I would suggest filing the Writ of summons in your own child's name, to get the record copies, quickly, for your own statement to be factual, of what was done or not done in your child's best interest, resulting in internal damages.

REPORTING CHILD ABUSE:

    The duty is of the professional by policy, is that the medical persons are so supposed to be thinking persons and to know bogus policies by evidence of visual information on the condition of the cord and the placenta.

     If parents, or any informed adult,  see the medical  policies questionable, it is their duty to report bogus policies and to the court of law, if the intent of any community is to impose them, in a militant stand of doctors following training and will impose on any child, or on multiple births.   

    The perceived legal duty, of any professional person, was to report anything, including bogus medical policies or clinical studies,  that would endanger any one  child  and would encourage other medical students or licensed medical persons to follow a bogus policy.

PROFESSIONAL OPINION AVAILABLE :

• Heart problems may originate by immediate umbilical cord clamping is the opinion of retired obstetricians   Dr. George M. Morley,  He never had a child born in his care, who had holes in the heart.  He was trained and did delayed umbilical cord clamping, waiting for all pulsation of the umbilical cord to cease, before clamping and cutting.

• Some holes in the heart are caused by no one's fault, here is the link to a happy-ending story of a series of heart operations.

There are success stories too:  

        Link:   Tetralogy of Fallot is a cyanotic heart defect. It is a combination of 4 ("tetra") abnormalities of the heart which were first described by a French physician, Dr. Etienne Fallot, in 1888. Link:    http://pages.ivillage.com/stephandjake/braveheart/id1.html

    A success story of a TOF operation on, William Jacob Brown, Braveheart.

http://pages.ivillage.com/stephandjake/braveheart/index.html

• Informed women, mostly on the internet, and in discussion chat lines, after studying the placenta and knowing its magical care of her child, are doing, at their informed will, no clamping of the cord, or cutting of the child's umbilical cord.  In some cases, , perhaps, never, or for many hours, they leave the cord, naturally, alone.  Their babies are blue-ribbon-babies, if, ALSO, the mother was undrugged during labor, AS TO HER CHOICE.

• It was stated in a Biology book, Inquiry Into Life, 9th Edition, Sylvia S. Mader, Author, that one in four persons have heart problems. Inquiry Into Life, also stated one in sixteen children are born with defects, subtle to serious.  

    Canadian Medical Association Journal 1992; 147(12); 1781-1786 Reference No. FN92-03 reported that revived infants, were having imposed on them 10 to 15 percent total blood volume taking from them, blood letting, every 2nd and 3rd day .  

• Most of those neonates were premature infants, already weakened by early cord clamping, less then a minute of blood transfusion. The trend on a premature baby is 30 to 45 seconds clamping by recent studies.  
• This is an improvement to previous care of immediate cord clamping, alleged to be a benefit to prevent blood-overflow or heart attacks, but the person teaching that myth or trend is not yet identified, or the study.  
• Immediate clamping and only 30 to 45 second clamping is still, in the view of many, far from natural occurrence if the child was born by unassisted birth.
•  No mother would interfere with a pulsating cord with the placenta yet inside her womb.  The internal compass of intuition and love for the child would mean the mother would do no risk-taking until the baby is free of her own body.  That is natural instinct.  
• Hasty umbilical cord clamping, is unnatural.  The facts when done, can be in the draining the placenta and the quality of stem cells in the placenta blood would likely reveal motive of clamping, quickly, a newborn's lifeline, and a premature child, known least able to survive blood land oxygen deprivation of 20 to 50 percent total blood volume.
• The duty would be to each community as to local policies not revealed to their society, what that particular hospital is doing, governed by any changes of the Hospital act of best practice possible, and not for human experiments wanting human placenta blood for stem cells and other components of blood, enzymes and hormones, white cells, and so forth.
• The Hospitals having possible income from shipping of placenta blood to drug companies and for research or doctors doing private billings are able to be investigated if the police wanted to do that for criminal violations of failing to give equal protection to the newborn child, the neonate. Various Criminal Codes require all persons, even doctors, to provide for this duty of care to another.
•  All income of doctors and hospitals accounting records of all income are to be kept in good order of the facts how income is being earned.  This is true even for non-profit hospitals governed by the Hospital Act and their Boards, even if volunteer.   
• The duty of volunteer boards is to be guided and governed by the Criminal acts, the Charter and all enactments governing the duty of care to all, for security of person and equal protection, regardless of age, color, race, sex, or mental and/or physical disabilities or disadvantages of groups.
• I would regard false information in textbooks and biology books making it a disadvantaged to women and discrimination to them by facts not stated in these books as to their reproduction system, and the proper care and duty to the new born human child, as is a duty to govern our care to any placenta birthing mammal.   Therefore, by lack of truth and facts in these textbooks, paid by the taxpayer in most instances, the woman who would become pregnant would not be able to protect herself or her newborn child.  
• This false teaching, or withholding information, is a from of discrimination to a woman's unique reproduction system and her natural abilities to protect her baby, when requested to trust in the care of trained and licensed medical persons.  
• These licensed persons by duty of those experienced are to be adequately trained, in ethics and best practice possible, and I am not perceiving this is being carried out, but wrongful policies directed for all babies to be immediately clamped and few doctors and nurses or midwives dissenting from false practices or going public they are "false."

Neonatal Resuscitation:   The NRP guidelines ,  Elliott Robert D,.MD, FRCPC, Department of Anaesthesia, Ottawa Hospital - General Site, University of Ottawa, Ottawa reported that one in sixteen infants must be revived after birth.  

• Other reports are that since before the Second World War, the caesarean sections have increased from 2 to 5 percent emergency sections, to a questionable 25 percent of all births, world wide.  The trend of those babies born in s-sections is not to take the baby out with the placenta and cord still attached for continued blood transfusion.  
• These babies, in most instances, to current trend of teaching, are having a clamped cord, then cut, then the baby taken out risking lung disorders frequently observed in this method of care to c-section babies.  (IRDS).  The doctor's excuse this by saying the child's lungs were not fully developed.  Yet, the placenta babies of no clamping never had IRDS.   
• The questionable practice are known to have babies who have both heart and lung problems (IRDS).  Many doctors then attribute health problems to infants of c-sections due to the need of a c-section, and not necessarily the timing of the clamping of the infant's lifeline.
• The babies so deprived of adequate blood volume transfused at birth have anemia, so mental deficiency disorders and poor growth are likely too.  These trends are not facts of science, but habits, trends, trends, traditions, fears, and myths. But one fact is generally accepted, the trapped blood in the placenta is used for another, rather then for the benefits of the owner/neonate, immediate to his / her birth rights and needs.  
• All hospitals without the parents awareness are involved in taking this trapped blood for research, before discarding the placenta, or they send the placenta with the blood in it, to research.  This violates the DNA privacy of both the mother and the father, or risks it.  
• The consequences of impaired and compromised children can be subtle internal defects in organs development, dehydrated by lack of oxygenated blood.   
• Scans used before birth, may be a factor that can interrupt likely the normal growth of even one cell that directs 10, 000 others.  The consequences of scans to the infant, at any time, are not fully known.  Nor are they monitored per child who was scanned, how many times, and when, to the result that the child was born with defects, even minor defects, physical or internal, then are apparent at birth, or latent later, as to internal damages.  Such matters are not not being sufficiently followed up, and recorded as to machinery and manufacture's  and recommendation of use when scanning are not being done for fairness of the infants with such defects.  
• All such information is important when such technology is taking chances with the human race.  And the fairness for compensation to the child's right when he / she fails to grow and mature as his / her peer developed, when not so subject to modern technology and methods.
• We must begin to consider if modern methods are best for babies, such as scans, and accepting drugs, during labor, with questionable preservatives in them, and trace elements, and lack of knowledge of the mother that all drugs cross the placenta.
• The harm is to injury to fully developed organs, if labor drugs are taken during labor and during the child's birth, or the mother is injected as the baby passes through the birth canal and the clamping on the cord is immediate.  
• The lack of good faith is the doctor and the nurse who did not discuses the intentions before they did them to the child, and failed to record them after the fact, as unimportant, to them, to do so.

Heart problems can originate by immediate umbilical cord clamping .

That is the opinion of Dr. G. M. Morley.  A layman's explanation on logic is as follows based in read research:

• The heart is caused to give up its blood, by immediate cord clamping, to actually shrink, the blood rushing to the lungs, that were wrongfully stopped of 4 to 6 ounces of blood coming from the placenta to change over the fetus from the mother's system of providing oxygen to now the born neonate's system of self-sufficiency.
•  Lungs, heart, brain, will all suffer for lack of adequate oxygenated blood's steady volume and pressure.  Man does not interrupt the circulation of animals, born in the wild, no one is there to clamp the cord, and they do not die, nor bleed to death.  Man is a mammal and he will NOT die, either in normal birth situation, if the placenta and cord are not detached.  And the benefits if the umbilical cord is not invasively managed after an infant's birth, by clamping a pulsating cord, or hand-squeezing are documented, since 1801.  
• The lungs deprived of transfusion and perfusion of the blood clamped off from the pulsating umbilical cord, would be logically impaired.  Logically, holes in the heart and heart murmurs and cause of disease can start in an heart vein or artery. Brain lesions in the brain can be caused of any cell, even for a second that do not have continuos oxygen and fluid around them.  
• Brain scans have shown drugs and hasty clamping, caused brain lesions..  This is reported on pages 48-50,The Magical Child JC. Pearce.  Such facts were known to the medical professionals since the early 1960's.  But women were not informed, adequately in health classes, prenatal classes, or in biology books to know how to birth a child without drugs, scans, and hasty clamping and proper gravity birth positions.  
• Prevention by following proper birth process and leaving the umbilical cord of a newborn baby alone is best.
• The Pioneers prior to 1923, when most babies were born on the farm, were not clamped, the mothers were not drugged, and the babies of that time are still living, while they have buried their children at young ages of many disorders.  It can be presumed wrongful medical practices during the child's delivery are a factor.   
• Changes in science were 1900, blood typing by Karl Landsteiner, an Austrian-American immunologist, ABO; 1914, the storage of blood became possible by using the addition of chemicals that prevented clots from forming; 1917 First World War brought experimentations on the battle fields of wounded soldiers; and various preserving solutions permit blood to be stored as long as three weeks; and with freeze-drying, perhaps, infinitely.  The separating of blood components allows the blood to to help a number of patients.  
• The Federal agency, the Food and Drug Administration regulates all blood banks.   The American National Red Cross operates many of them.  Blood banks in the nation collect more than 9 million pints of blood a year.  The blood is collected in plastic bags that contain a preservative in them. (heparin)
• Blood donors must meet certain requirements of age:  (17 years old), health (finished growing), and weight (110 pounds). Informed consent is generally an assumed Constitutional and Charter of Right and duty to any person or accountability to a legal guardian for the best interest of the person that blood or an organ is being taken from.  This is to assure security of person and equal protection to all regardless of age, sex, color, race, mental and/or physical disadvantages.
• Blood collection is not generally accepted from any individual more then every two months,  to protect their health.  The donations of blood are generally unpaid for.  That did not happen in the states until after 1970.  Up to that time the United States paid for blood. (World Book,  Vol B, page 327-330.  
• Associations in blood collection have been the Red Cross, founded in 1863, in Switzerland.  The beginnings where by Jean Henri Dunant,  a Swiss banker and philanthropists.  He formed a group of volunteers to help the wounded  in the field at Solfernio, on the day after 40,000 men had been killed or wounded in a battle.  He published a pamphlet called Un Souvenir de Solferino (Recollections of Solferino)  "Would it not be possible to found and organize in all civilized countries permanent societies of volunteers who in time of war would give help to the wounded without regard for their nationality?'   
• The States established a Red Cross by the efforts of Clare Barton, in 1881; and Canada began the in the Northwest Rebellion of 1885 started by  Major General G. S. Ryerson, and established the first overseas branch of the British Red Cross in 1896.   The Canadian Red Cross Society  developed from this small branch, and was incorporated in 1909.  The International Committee of the Red Cross recognized the Canadian Red Cross in 1927. (World Book Vol R, Red Cross pages 175-178)
• These iatrogenic disorders are preventable only by proper, adequate and ethical training of medical persons and surgeons. The rights and the legal duty of the mother and father is to make sure their medical person is an ethical and adequately trained person; and if they are unsure, to perhaps return to unassisted birth, in the home, as did the pioneers do and had healthy strong babies, if both mother and father had good health, free of addictions, at the time the child was conceived, and the mother had an environment conducive to a healthy normal development of the child, to birth and protective care, thereafter, to the child's best benefit.  
• I have read questionable heinous experiments on trusting women and their newborn child, called a neonate.  Surely these women did not know the experiments of immediate clamping, raising and lowering their child, then the need of the rival of the child, when no clamping or cutting is an no harm alterative choice and right of choice over the doctor's intentions to endanger, for whatever reasons, harvesting or time efficiency to get the third stage of labor over and done with.
• To know proper care of the infant, at conception to its birth, as much as it depends on us, we should also do our part to have a clean environment, clean air, water, and land if we want to have our blue-ribbon babies for humans and wild animals.  The strong help the weak and do not exploit them.

Rhythm Disorders
http://www.mission4health.com/services/centers_heart_rhythm.htm
    "A rhythm disorder, or dysrrhythmia , is an abnormality in the regular beat of the heart.  The heart may beat too fast (tachycardia), beat too slowly (bradycardia) or beat irregularly.

     Arrhythmias  occur when there is a disturbance in the way the heart transmits electrical impulses. Either the natural pacemaker develops an abnormal rate or rhythm; the normal pathway for a heartbeat is interrupted; or another part of the heart takes over as the pacemaker."

• copyright permission to use at dyoung@pris.ca   Home Page:   www.lotusbirth.com

Further information is found at www.cordclamping.com   and www.123-baby-birth.com .  clamping www.123-baby-birth.com/neonate

Comments to:   donna@123babybirth.com   alternative:   dyoung@pris.ca "Phases of the Cardiac Cycle:
The cardiac cycle is the cycle of events that occurs as the heart contracts. There are two phases of the cardiac cycle. In the diastole phase, the heart ventricles are relaxed and the heart fills with blood. In the systole phase, the ventricles contract and pump blood to the arteries."

http://biology.about.com/b/a/090126.htm (Regina Bailey) http://biology.about.com/od/anatomy/a/aa060404a.htm

For the Electrical Impulses of the Heart, check out this web site:

The Conduction System

http://www.tmc.edu/thi/conduct.html

To Quote:  "Electrical impulses from your heart muscle (the myocardium) cause your heart to beat (contract). This electrical signal begins in the sinoatrial (SA) node, located at the top of the right atrium. The SA node is sometimes called the heart's "natural pacemaker." When an electrical impulse is released from this natural pacemaker, it causes the atria to contract. The signal then passes through the atrioventricular (AV) node. The AV node checks the signal and sends it through the muscle fibers of the ventricles, causing them to contract. The SA node sends  electrical impulses at a certain rate, but your heart rate may still change depending on physical demands, stress, or hormonal factors."

The Heart Beat:

http://www.tmc.edu/thi/systole.html

To Quote:

A heartbeat is a two-part pumping action that takes about a second. As blood collects in the upper chambers (the right and left atria), the heart's natural pacemaker (the SA node) sends out an electrical signal that causes the atria to contract. This contraction pushes blood through the tricuspid and mitral valves into the resting lower chambers (the right and left ventricles). This part of the two-part pumping phase (the longer of the two) is called the diastole .

The second part of the pumping phase begins when the ventricles are full of blood. The electrical signals from the SA node travel along a pathway of cells to the ventricles, causing them to contract. This is called systole . As the tricuspid and mitral valves shut tight to prevent a back flow of blood, the pulmonary and aortic valves are pushed open. While blood is pushed from the right ventricle into the lungs to pick up oxygen, oxygen-rich blood flows from the left ventricle to the heart and other parts of the body.

After blood moves into the pulmonary artery and the aorta, the ventricles relax, and the pulmonary and aortic valves close. The lower pressure in the ventricles causes the tricuspid and mitral valves to open, and the cycle begins again. This series of contractions is repeated over and over again, increasing during times of exertion and decreasing while you are at rest.

Your heart does not work alone, though. Your brain tracks the conditions around you—climate, stress, and your level of physical activity—and adjusts your cardiovascular system to meet those needs.

The human heart is a muscle designed to remain strong and reliable for a hundred years or longer. "

___________________________________________________________________________________

Other links to the actual visual human heart and other mammal (animal) hearts photos:

http://faculty.washington.edu/kepeter/119/images/heart_sections.htm

_______________________________________

Moving animated flow of blood into the heart:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/eheart/human.html

______________________________________________